Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, welcome to the Public Storage fourth quarter and full year 2022 earnings call. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode, and the floor will be open for your questions following the presentation. If you have a question at that time, please press star one on your telephone keypad. If you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press star two. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Ryan Burke, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin. Thank you, Chelsea. Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us for our fourth quarter 2022 earnings call. I'm here with Joe Russell and Tom Boyle. Before we begin, we want to remind you that certain matters discussed during this call may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain economic risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements speak only as of today, February 22nd, 2022, and we assume no obligation to update, revise, or supplement statements that may become untrue because of subsequent events. A reconciliation to GAAP of the non-GAAP financial measures we provide on this call is included in our earnings release. You can find our press release, supplement reports, SEC reports, and an audio replay of this conference call on our website, publicstorage.com. We do ask that you initially limit yours elf to two questions. Of course, after that, feel free to jump back in queue with additional questions. With that, I'll turn the call over to Joe. Thank you, Ryan, and thank you for joining us. I'm going to begin by providing color on two recent announcements. We'll then move to on to our performance in 2022 and outlook for 2023. First, on February 5th, we announced a 50% increase to our quarterly common dividend, a raise from $8 to $12 per share on an annualized basis. It is a result of a great effort by the team that has produced record performance over the last few years and a validation of our ongoing confidence in the strength of our platform. Second, as announced separately, we made a proposal to acquire Life Storage at a substantial premium after several attempts to engage in negotiations privately. I'd like to highlight a few important reasons why we think this combination is poised to unlock superior growth and value creation for shareholders. First, there is significant opportunity to accelerate growth and profitability as Life Storage's portfolio benefits from Public Storage's industry-leading brand. Our platform achieves approximately 80% same-store operating margins compared to Life Storage's margins at approximately 73%, we see an opportunity to narrow that gap with their real estate assets as part of our industry-leading platform. Second, we believe there is significant upside to grow revenues and earnings in our respective ancillary business lines, including storage insurance, third-party property management, business customer offerings, and lending. Third, we see expanded portfolio growth opportunities as we leverage Public Storage's fully integrated in-house development team, the only one of its kind in the industry, to capitalize on additional development and redevelopment opportunities to enhance Life Storage's existing portfolio. Finally, all of this will be supported by an industry-leading balance sheet with low pro forma leverage and advantage cost to capital and significant capacity to fund future growth in conjunction with retained cash flow. Since announcing the proposal, we have received overwhelmingly positive feedback from both companies' shareholders who clearly recognize the significant benefits uniquely achievable through a combination with Public Storage. As you likely saw on February 16th, Life Storage issued its own press release rejecting our proposal. Nothing in that response changed our thinking. We have a high level of conviction in the strategic and financial merits, and we are committed to pursuing a potential combination. We are encouraged in that February 16th release, Life Storage indicated openness to opportunities to enhance shareholder value. We look forward to engaging in good faith discussions regarding a mutually agreeable combination. While we appreciate that analysts and shareholders have ongoing questions with respect to our proposal, the purposes of today's call is to discuss our fourth quarter earnings and our outlook for 2023. As such, we will not be addressing questions related to the proposal at this time. Now turning to our performance and outlook. 2022 was a year of milestones for Public Storage, including celebrating our 50th anniversary. The team and platform achieved record results in our same-store and non-same-store portfolios, elevating the customer experience through technology and operating model transformation, enhancing our properties through the Property of Tomorrow program, and growing the portfolio through acquisitions, development, and redevelopment, and third-party management. We did all of this while maintaining the industry's best balance sheet, which is poised to fund growth moving forward in conjunction with significant retained cash flow. To name just a few of our collective accomplishments, we achieved an 80% stabilized direct NOI margin through the combination of revenue generation and expense efficiency that only Public Storage is capable of. We grew beyond 200 million owned sq ft and $4 billion in total revenues. We built our property development pipeline to approximately $1 billion. We received the prestigious Great Place to Work award based on feedback provided directly by our employees. We achieved top-scoring U.S. self-storage REITs across the leading sustainability benchmarks. We are firing on all cylinders while strengthening the already formidable competitive advantages we have across our business. Those competitive advantages are heightened in the type of macro environment we are in today. On top of two consecutive years of record, 20% + Core FFO growth. Simply put, we have the people, technologies, platforms, and brand which lead us to a position of strength in 2023. Demand for self-storage remains strong, as you see with our move-in volume up more than 11% during the quarter. The aspects of the business that have historically made it resilient are on display. This is a needs-based business with demand drivers that are multidimensional and fluid throughout economic cycles. We also continue to benefit from a newer driver in the form of people spending more time at home, which has increasing permanence with remote and hybrid work here to stay. Our customer lengths of stay are at record levels, a positive trend given rent increases to existing customers are a key driver to our revenue growth. The outlook for new competitive supply is also in our favor. We are seeing less new property development nationally due to higher interest rates, cost pressures, difficult municipal processes, and concern over the macro landscape. With continuing strong demand, less pressure from new supply, and our numerous competitive advantages, we are very well positioned in 2023. Now I'll turn the call over to Tom. Thanks, Joe. I'll start with a review of capital allocation for the year. We invested $1 billion between acquisitions and developments in 2022, including the $190 million Neighborhood Florida portfolio in the fourth quarter. That portfolio added to our over 400 properties that we're operating with our remote property management platforms. The 2022 acquisition environment was impacted by a shift of cost of capital, with transaction volumes down and driven by smaller deals compared to 2021. We expect that trend to continue this year with our forecast for $750 million of transaction volume for Public Storage consistent with last year. We are well-positioned as an acquirer today, given our industry-leading balance sheet and cost of capital. In adding to acquisitions, our development pipeline stands at approximately $1 billion as we seek to expand the portfolio with our in-house team. The development environment is challenging today across the industry, as Joe highlighted. Against that backdrop, Public Storage is planning on delivering $375 million of new Generation 5 properties in 2023 and more in 2024 as we lean on our development competitive advantages. We look forward to putting these new properties on our national platform to drive outperformance. Now on to financial performance. We finished the year strong, reporting Core FFO of $4.16 for the quarter and $15.92 for the year, ahead of the upper end of our guidance range and representing 22.4% growth over the fourth quarter of 2021, excluding the contribution of PS Business Parks. Let's look at the contributors for the quarter. In the same-store, our revenue increased 13% compared to the fourth quarter of 2021. That performance represents a moderation from last quarter's 14.7% growth and a return to seasonality and tough comps comparing to 2021. On expenses, same-store direct cost of operations were up 5.3%. In total, net operating income for the same-store pool of stabilized properties was up 15.8% in the quarter. In addition to the same-store, the lease-up and performance of recently acquired and developed facilities remained a standout, growing 51% compared to last year. I'll shift to the outlook. We introduced 2023 Core FFO guidance with a $16.45 midpoint, representing 5.5% growth from 2022, again, excluding the contribution of PS Business Parks. As we enter the year, there's no question there's a wide range of potential macroeconomic pathways that will influence customer demand and behavior. The consumer has held up well to this point in the year, but the Fed is certainly signaling they're not finished. If we look at the same-store revenue outlook, I'd characterize the low end of the range of the outlook as a recessionary pathway and the higher end as a softer landing for the economy. We anticipate occupancy will be lower throughout the year and follow a typical seasonal pattern. Rate will be the driver of revenue growth, with the moderation through the year based on lower move-in rents and tougher existing tenant rate increase comps. That moderation results in trending towards longer-term averages of growth. Our expectations are for 5.75% same-store expense growth, driven primarily by property tax and marketing expense. That leads to same-store NOI growth at the midpoint of 3.2%. Our non-same store acquisition and development properties are again poised to be a strong contributor, growing from $448 million of NOI contribution in 2022 to $520 million at the midpoint. Looking ahead to 2024 and beyond, the incremental non-same store NOI to stabilization from those properties acquired or completed at December 31st is an additional $80 million of NOI. This pool of lease-up assets will continue to be a powerful growth engine over the next several years. Last but not least, our capital and liquidity position remain rock solid. We have a well-laddered long-term debt profile with limited floating rate exposure and over $4 billion of preferred stock with perpetual fixed distributions. Our leverage of 3.4x net debt and preferred to EBITDA, combined with nearly $800 million of cash on hand at quarter- end, puts us in a very strong position heading into 2023. With that, I'd like to open the call up for questions. Thank you. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star and one key on your touch tone phone. If at any time you find your question has been addressed, you may remove yourself from the queue by pressing star two. Once again, that is star one to ask a question. Our first question will come from Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Thanks. Good morning out there. I guess maybe, Tom, for you, as you thought about setting guidance for this year, I can appreciate a number of the different components that you laid out, and there's kind of a wide range there. I guess which components do you feel like have the most potential upside and downside risk, I guess, both on the revenue side and on the expense side, where you could come back and be positively surprised or negatively surprised? Sure. That's a good question, Steve. I wanna make a couple comments here. One, I'd like to comment a little bit around how the year started, which is pretty consistent trends with what we saw through the fourth quarter. Move in, move out trends, pretty consistent. We've seen move-in volumes up circa 10%, move-in rates that have been down mid single digits, consistent with that, we call it 5% ± that we saw in the fourth quarter. We're seeing continued good demand for storage through the first part of the year. I do think in response to your question, I'd like to break the year of 2023 into two halves. The first half, as we think about it, you know, consistent trends as we've seen through the fourth quarter into the first, but facing really tough comps as we move through the first part of the year. That's gonna lead to some of the moderation I spoke to. The second but ultimately, with higher levels of absolute revenue growth, given we're starting the year from a position of strength. If you think about the second part of the year, there's a couple of things to highlight. One, the comps will be easier in the second half of the year, given we'll be comping against a more seasonal end of 2021, or 2022 rather. The flip side is the macro uncertainty is significantly higher. As you think about the pathways that I described for the outlook, at the lower end, a recessionary pathway that, you know, we highlighted in some of our disclosures, that recessionary pathway likely leads to negative year-over-year revenue growth, as you would be typical to see in a recession. Towards the higher end, certainly that would lead to positive growth and easier comps and could result in better revenue growth performance as we move through the second half. I'd say, as we think about the year, the second half has much more uncertainty towards it than the first half does. Okay. Then second question, I don't know if it's for you or for Joe, but just as you think about capital deployment, you know, you still have a billion dollars of development, but you mentioned that, you know, doing new deals is challenging. Just help us understand kinda where you think acquisition yields are in relation to new development yields. Kinda where does that spread stand today and, you know, how do you think that might trend over the next kinda one to two years? Yeah, Steve. There certainly is a continuing trend that played through in 2022 that we think still applies to 2023. First of all, on the acquisition side, likely to be, you know, lower volumes of transaction activity. You know, certainly we're seeing that by virtue of how the year started off. It's not untypical year in and year out where, you know, the first quarter or so might be on the light side. That's definitely the case as we speak. So we're, you know, looking for and evaluating, you know, the trends tied to impacts from higher cost of capital, limited availability of capital, again, how sellers are looking at this environment to transact assets. Typically, more stabilized assets are gonna command stronger cap rates. I tell you today, compared to maybe where we were a year ago, cap rates are still up, you know, into that 100-125 basis point range where stabilized assets might have a five handle on them, whether it's, you know, low, mid or high five cap rate, it's gonna depend on location, quality of the asset, et cetera. Depending on the stabilized level of the asset, there's gonna be more flexibility in the cap rate, and you're gonna see, you know, different pricing mechanisms tied to those types of assets. Our focus, as it has been, to actually look for those kinds of assets because that's where we see the higher value creation. That certainly played through the acquisition volume that we captured that Tom talked about in 2022. We're still out hunting for good quality assets. Our backlog right now between close and under contracts, approximately $70 million. Frankly, the market's a little slow right now, so we'll see. It's not unusual for, though, the market to start picking up, you know, toward the, you know, the summer months. We'll see again how that plays through on that, you know, set of opportunities. Now, on the flip side, from a development standpoint, as you mentioned, yes, our pipeline continues to be quite robust. It's more difficult to do development, not any different than what we've been talking about for the last year or two. Our team's working hard to extract, you know, prime land sites. We're actually finding some very good opportunities there. Frankly, we've got skills and abilities that our competitors in the private world particularly do not have. With that, we've been able to extract prime sites, good opportunities to actually get the types of returns that we've been speaking to for the last couple of years, where we're expecting ± 8% or north cash-on-cash yields on these investments. We're very encouraged by our own pipeline. We're encouraged, as Tom mentioned, relative to the lease up and the contribution those types of assets have, you know, to our overall revenue and NOI performance. Our non-same store portfolio continues to be very vibrant. We're very encouraged that we've got the right skills and the fortitude and the ability to look long-term through what could be still a very challenging development cycle, which frankly, is a good thing. It gives us more ability to actually go out and capture, as I mentioned, those great land sites, put our Gen 5 properties into a variety of different markets. Nationally, we've got good opportunities across the spectrum. We're gonna continue to focus on that as we speak. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question will come from Michael Goldsmith with UBS. Your line is open. Good afternoon. Thanks a lot for taking my question. On the guidance, you said the low end of the range is for a recession scenario, while the high end is a soft landing. Do you see a 50% probability of a soft landing, and you end up at the high end, and a 50% probability of a recession, you end up at the low end? Or is it more 75%, 25%, or another another combination? I'm trying to understand the likelihood of where you see yourself ending up within that range at this time. Sure. Good question, Michael. I think there's a couple things there. The first is we wanted to provide a range that encapsulated multiple pathways because we know everyone on this call probably has their own point of view as to what percentage probability a recessionary pathway is or a soft landing is. We thought it was appropriate to provide that wider range, and obviously investors can make their own perspective. As we look at it, you know, we look at the potential outcomes as relatively balanced within that range, but we don't obviously know what the Fed's going to do and how the consumer is gonna react. You know, three or four weeks ago, interest rates were lower. There was talk of a no landing. You know, over those three weeks, we've gone back to the fact that maybe that no landing is off the table. I think that's gonna ebb and flow as we go through the year. Our objective was to provide investors and analysts a framework to understand what could play out through the year according to those macro pathways. Got it. Then on ECRIs this year, pre-pandemic, you were sending increases of 8%-10%, let's say, every 12 months. Over the past year and a half, you've been sending maybe mid-teens, high teens increases every 9 months or so. For the upcoming year, you know, and including your guidance, like, can you help quantify the expected rate and frequency of ECRIs over the year? Obviously, it's gonna change depending on the different scenarios, but maybe, if you can talk about what the plan is and just kind of maybe how the top of funnel traffic looks right now because that's gonna play a role in your ability to pass along the ECRIs this year. Thank you. Sure. Thanks, Michael. To talk specifically about the existing tenant rate increase program, then I'll hit around the top of funnel demand as well. We've consistently spoken about our existing tenant rate increase program as really two components. The first is, how is the consumer reacting to increases? How are they performing and behaving? We've noted in the past, and I would reiterate today, that the consumer continues to perform at expectations, and the sensitivity is largely in line with expectations. There's no real change to the thought process around that program on that side. The second component is the cost to replace that tenant when they leave. There's no question that that's changed quite a bit over the last several years. You had markets like Miami, where rents were up 25%-30%, and there was no cost to replace. There was, in fact, a benefit to replace a potentially in-place tenant. That's started to shift as we move through 2022 and into 2023. That impact will result in lower magnitude and lower frequency increases, but still to optimize revenue from that pool of existing tenants and new tenants that come in. The second part of your question around how is top-of-funnel demand performing, I think is an important one because as Joe mentioned, move-in volumes through the fourth quarter were up nearly 12%. Move-in volumes through the first part of this year are up double digits as well. We're seeing good demand from new customers coming into the system. We're spending a little bit more on advertising, our rates are a little bit lower, there's a little bit more promotional discounts in order to achieve that. Ultimately the customers are very willing and looking forward to storage spaces to move into, and that's enabling us to capture those tenants, which I think is where you were going with the question. Those tenants will be good long-term tenants, or a portion of them will, as they move through 2023 as well. Thank you very much. Good luck in 2023. Thanks, Michael. Thank you. Our next question will come from Jeff Spector with Bank of America. Your line is open. Great. Thank you. Good afternoon. I'm gonna push a little bit on the guidance here. I totally understand, given the macro picture here and lack of clarity, first half, second half. Let's focus on, I guess, peak leasing season. You know, when does that really start? You know, if we're through, let's just say, June, July, like is that the bulk of it? Again, my understanding is that I think there's even a lag to any recession where it hits storage. I'm just trying to get a picture of like how this could shake out, play out through the most important months, your peak leasing season. You know, I think to answer the question directly, we typically see the peak leasing season really start in April, pick up in May in a really big way, and then into June and July. To your point, it's not very far away, and we're already seeing some of the seasonal patterns that you would anticipate in some of our markets, right? The more seasonal markets are already starting to see a pickup in occupancy as we sit here in February compared to the end of the year, for instance. That typical seasonal pattern is starting to play out, which is encouraging. I think where you may be going is, there's certainly a chance that if there is a recession that comes, it's later in the year and not earlier in the year. That certainly would impact the financial performance of the sector through the year. Obviously if it's a good busy season that has a very positive impact on the overall financial performance and operational performance of the business. Thanks, Tom. Does that, I mean, change or alter any strategy during the peak leasing months to grab more customers? Like how do you operate given this uncertainty? Again, things seem rock solid right now, preparing potentially for, let's say, a weaker fall or winter months or potentially into 2024. Yeah. I'd say we're constantly looking to dynamically manage the current environment. As we just noted, it's hard to know exactly where we'll be sitting next year at this time, but we'll be planning week by week and day by day through our operational team to react to what we're seeing and ultimately maximizing our own performance and serving our customers well through a busy time period in the summer when there's typically strong demand for our storage space. Great. Thank you. Thanks, Jeff. Thank you. Our next question will come from Juan Sanabria with BMO. Your line is open. Hi. Good morning. Just looking to further the discussions on the same-store revenue guidance. Wondering if you could talk a little bit about what you expect within the range the fourth quarter or exit run rate to be? If I think about last year, you guys really called it like you saw it. You were well ahead of the peers in the initial guidance set and relative to some of the maybe more tried and true kind of being a little bit more conservative and playing the beat and raise game. Are you guys changing it up, or are you really trying to call it like you see it this time with the full acknowledgement that the uncertainty is much greater this year? There's a whole host of questions in there, Juan. Let me try to take a few of them at a time here. I think the first part of the question is around the second half and talking a little bit more about the second half, and maybe even you're trying to tease out for me 2024 guidance. I do think the characterization- Just fourth quarter. Just fourth quarter, right. I'll go back to the first half, second half comment, which is the first half and the tougher comps that we're gonna experience is gonna lead to some moderation as we face those comps through the first half, which will lower the absolute level of growth as we go through the first half. The second half, to the points I made earlier, really will depend on the busy season performance, like Jeff was just speaking to, and the macroeconomic environment and how the consumer is impacted by what the Fed is likely to do and the excess savings that the consumers have for a period of time and how quickly they burn through that excess savings, et cetera. I think as we looked at that and modeled different consumer behavior through the year, there's a number of different moving pieces there, right. One is new storage demand, the other is existing tenant performance, rate sensitivity, delinquency, all of those things. If you look at a typical recessionary environment, what you'd find is weakness really across the board in those metrics, which is what's led to negative year-over-year revenue performance and recessions in the past. In that recessionary pathway we've spoken to, we would expect that there's negative year-over-year revenue declines like we've seen in prior recessions. You will have the benefit of easier comps in the second half, which, you know, will help offset some of that potential weakness. On the flip side, right, we're just talking about, well, is there a recession? When does it come? How deep is it? All those sorts of things, which, you know, we can sit here and prognosticate on, ultimately we're gonna find out over the next six to 12 months. If the consumer is stronger, if the labor market holds up more effectively, if the Fed doesn't push the labor market as tough, there could certainly be a situation where there's pretty healthy positive growth in the second half because of that strength of the U.S. consumer and the fact that we'll be having easier comps in the second half. I think that's our sense of the range of potential outcomes, and I hope that that's responsive to your question. As it relates to exactly how we'll exit, I think it'll depend on how that second half moves forward. I tried. Then just on expenses, curious if you could just give a little bit more color or numbers around the major food groups, property taxes, marketing, et cetera, that I know you called that a little bit in prepared remarks, but I'm hoping to flush that out a little bit more. Yeah, sure. Specifically within the same store operating expenses, our largest operating expense line item is property taxes. We ended the year of 2022 with property taxes with a 4% growth on them. We continue to expect that that's likely to be a higher growth rate as we move into the coming years, given the NOI growth that we've seen in the sector over the past several years. We're expecting something like 5%-6% growth there, and obviously we'll update as we move through the year. That's certainly the biggest driver of operating expense growth. The others are smaller. The second one I highlighted in my prepared remarks was marketing. You saw in the fourth quarter, we increased marketing expense. That was to drive further top-of-funnel demand into the system, and we saw very good returns associated with that, really comping against a period in 2021 when there was very little spending in most of our markets. The percentage growth looks elevated against really low comps. Marketing expense is likely to be another one, 'cause in the first part of this year, we're facing those similar really low comps. Some of the other line items that are facing inflationary pressures, again, the strength of the labor market today continues. There's wage pressure. You could see even in the fourth quarter, we were able to mitigate some of those wage pressures given the digital transformation and operating model transformation that we've been working through over the past several years, which has led to efficiencies in staffing. That will help mitigate. Utilities is another one that we've seen, utility rates move higher, but we're looking to combat that with our investments in energy efficiency, be it our solar programs, which we're seeking to add about 300 properties with solar by the end of the year to bring our aggregate total to about 500 properties, and with more room to go there in future years, as well as our LED conversion helping to mitigate that. That's a high-level landscape of a number of the line items. Happy to go into any further detail if helpful. Thank you, Tom. Thanks, Juan. Thank you. Our next question will come from Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open. Hi, thanks. Good afternoon. Tom, first question, I guess back to the guidance. You know, you mentioned that occupancy will likely be lower throughout the year. You know, was wondering if you can, you know, maybe provide a little bit more detail there around what you might expect at sort of the low and high end of the range relative to where you ended the year, so call it down, you know, 250 basis points. Do you see that year-over-year spread widening or narrowing as you move throughout the year? Well, let me talk about the first half first, and then, you know, we can talk about the second half, which obviously we've spoken about. There's macro uncertainty that will influence that. As you think about the first half, we're starting the year with occupancy down about 2.4%. We do think that the occupancy decline that we experienced in the back half of 2022 was a seasonal occupancy decline. In fact, the decline from June to December was a touch better than a typical seasonal decline. Inherent in that is that, what we're seeing today is a pickup in occupancy in some of our seasonal markets. Would anticipate there's certainly the opportunity for that spread to narrow as we get into the busy season, as we've spoken to. Would follow a typical seasonal pattern from there in the back half. Okay. When you talk about these, the seasonal markets where you're already starting to see some occupancy build, you know, which markets are those? Well, they typically tend to be colder weather markets. You know, your Miamis and your Los Angeles and San Diegos, you don't see that same seasonal pattern. If you look at a Minneapolis or a Chicago or the Northeast, you start to see that seasonal pattern be more pronounced. Okay, got it. Just, circling back to, you know, capital deployment and some of the comments that you made earlier, around investments. When making acquisitions and some larger deals like you did in 2021, you know, you've talked about upside to the initial yields through margin improvements, the company scale and so forth. You know, I think sort of an extreme example, maybe not extreme, but you know, I think one example during 2021 was the $1.5 billion All Storage deal, which I think was, you know, sort of a 2%, mid 2% cap rate going in with an expectation to substantially increase that at stabilization. I realize the environment's, you know, different today and all. You, you know, all deals have different characteristics, but as you look at the current landscape and think about acquisitions, would you still be willing to tolerate initial dilution relative to your cost of capital early on like you have in, you know, in 2021 or in prior cycles? Or does the greater uncertainty today give you a little bit of pause around how you think about future growth and the spread to your cost of capital that you would be willing to invest at? Yeah. Todd, you know, I mentioned, you know, what, we've been doing strategically now for, you know, the last three years or more is, you know, looking for opportunities with assets that do have that upside that you're speaking to. Whether it's through, you know, some of the larger portfolios, All Storage included, you know, we bought that portfolio at about 74% occupancy. Had a nice lift, you know, really in a very short period of time relative to continued lease up and stabilization of the revenue, metrics, et cetera. We've done the exact same thing with one-off deals as well. That's something we're not gonna be shy about doing, and it continues to be a very good playbook for us. When we've got deep-seated knowledge market to market, which we do on the vast majority of deals that we acquire, we have an elevated level of confidence that once we put these assets into our own platform, you can see that extracted opportunity literally right out of the gate. You see the benefits as we've been speaking to relative to our brand, our platform, our efficiencies that assist, you know, higher margin opportunities, et cetera. We're definitely looking for those kinds of assets and have not backed away from them at all. That has and will continue to be a very vibrant part of our capital allocation process. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks, Todd. Thank you. Our next question will come from Spenser Allaway with Green Street. Your line is open. Thank you. Can you provide an update on the rent freeze that was put in place related to the California storms early in the year? Has this been lifted, and if not, is there any type of NOI headwind contemplated in guidance? Sure. I think, Spenser, you're speaking to the storms that took place in early January out here in California. There was a state of emergency that was put in place that is expiring here in February. I think as anticipated, there's gonna continue to be kind of one-off events like storms and rain in California, believe it or not, that can lead to state of emergency and pricing restrictions. We'll navigate those. As it relates to, what's embedded into our guidance expectations, you know, there's things like that that come in and come out of different markets. We'll try to take a reasonable estimate as to what those could be through the year. We're not underwriting any significant rental rate restrictions as we move through the year embedded in our outlook. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Oh, go ahead. No, go ahead. I was gonna say, you guys have provided a lot of great commentary on guidance in general and specifically on move-in rates and volumes, and how those are trending thus far in 2023. Are you guys able to comment on the recent magnitude of ECRI activity? Without providing specific line item guidance, is there any color you can provide on what's being contemplated in terms of ECRIs at both the high and low end of guidance? Sure. I'd go back to my response around existing tenant rate increases earlier, which is that, you know, there's no question that in certain markets we have a moderation in the magnitude and frequency that we've sent them. I highlighted Miami as an example, where rents in Miami for new customers were up 25%, 30% each year for the past several years, and that's started to slow down as we anticipated. That market and others can't grow like that in perpetuity. Because of that, you know, the magnitudes and frequency of rental rate increases to existing customers is likely to moderate this year, and we've already seen that to start the year. In terms of a band, I'm not gonna get into specifics around numbers or averages or whatnot, but there's a wide range of increases that we send to the tenant based on what we understand their sensitivity and the value they place in the unit, as well as the cost to replace that tenant if they do choose to move out. As we move through the year, that cost to replace the tenant could take different pathways along with the rest of the outlook. In the stronger outlook, it's gonna result in a stronger existing tenant rate increase magnitude and frequency, and the weaker outlook for new tenants is going to have the opposite effect. Okay. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question will come from Ki Bin Kim with Truist. Your line is open. Thanks. A quick one first. Implicit in your 2023 guidance, what are you thinking for move-in rates? Good question, Ki Bin. Certainly we started the year, as I've highlighted, with move-in rents that are below prior year, and we finished the fourth quarter in a similar territory. We are anticipating that we see rents lift as we move through the busy season months, as you'd anticipate, as customer demand increases, inventory gets tighter as you get to that point in the year, and that will lead to higher absolute rents. As I noted earlier around the comments around the second half, there's a lot of variability on what could play out. Obviously, if we're in a recessionary environment, would anticipate that move-in rental rates are lower as we're looking to capture demand. In an environment where consumer demand remains strong, that's gonna result in higher rental rates as we move through the year. As I noted earlier, part of the story in the second half compared to the first is comps, right? The comps are definitely tougher in the first half than they are in the second. Maybe I should have rephrased it. Your move-in rents are down 5% as of Q4, on a year-over-year basis, that's the way I'm trying to understand the trend. That's where they are right now too, Ki Bin. That's what they are right now as well. Okay. On your CapEx of, on guidance of $450 million, obviously this line item has grown over the past three years, and you do a great job of breaking it out between maintenance CapEx, Property of Tomorrow, and the solar LED. I'm just curious, you know, if some components of this CapEx might have a return, you know, a return associated with it, and if you can provide some color around that. The energy efficiency investment definitely leads to good returns. You know, as Tom mentioned, you know, we're combing the portfolio as we speak for solar opportunities in particular. We've basically re-lit the entire portfolio to LED. We had good, again, returns from that investment. As, you know, the additional stimulus has come through with recent legislation, there's even more motivation on our part to continue to look at multiple markets. Likely, you know, we'll get into, you know, a very sizable percentage of the entire portfolio that will have solar, I think, over the next, say, three to five years. At the onset here, as Tom mentioned, we've got, you know, 300 to 400 properties that are near term, likely, you know, very good candidates for good, strong returns. Property of Tomorrow, we're lifting, you know, the aesthetics, and the curb appeal and some of the functionality of the properties. It's a little harder to measure specific returns on that type of investment. We do see, you know, higher elevated level of customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, et cetera. Clearly, the enhancement market to market we're seeing from just the brand awareness, now that we're at a point of over, you know, 55%-60% of the portfolio, has been rebranded to the Property of Tomorrow standard market by market, and we're seeing, you know, very good receptivity to that as well. A little harder to measure just on a pure economic basis, but continue to see good results from that investment as well. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question will come from Ron Kamdem with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Hey, just going back to the guidance, maybe any more color on sort of the bad debt assumptions for the same-store revenue at the middle and at the upper and lower end of the range? Thanks. Ron, you're coming through kind of quiet, but I think what I heard was bad debt expectations that are- Correct embedded in the guidance outlook. Is that? Okay, good. I'd characterize bad debt overall as being continued to be a good performance through the first part of this year and the back half of last year. We spoke a lot at the onset of the pandemic around how delinquency and bad debt really declined pretty dramatically. We're off those lows, but consumers continue to pay their bills, and our delinquency remains a good bit below pre-pandemic levels. To speak to specifically the question on guidance and the ranges, in the recessionary pathway that we've spent a good bit of time talking about this morning, we did increase the bad debt assumption associated with that, as we would anticipate that we're likely to see bad debt increase through that pathway, and the reversal towards the higher end. Right. My second one, you talked about sort of the macro assumptions of the guidance, which was super helpful. Just wondering, you know, you guys are operating the business, are there sort of any leading indicators that you would see in first maybe before sort of the macro turns, whether it's, you know, move-in volumes or whatever? Are there sort of leading indicators that you guys are tracking to sort of get a handle on this from the ground? Yeah. I mean, you know, obviously we're running a month-to-month lease business. We move in, you know, 80+ thousand customers on a monthly basis and, you know, we have a healthy amount of move-outs as well. With that continuous flow of activity, we're constantly monitoring, you know, things like payment patterns to the degree of, you know, either change or what might be happening market to market relative to other macro events, et cetera. You know, the, you know, one of the more obvious metrics that we look at relative to just the stress and maybe the evolving nature of the economy at large is payment patterns. As Tom just mentioned, those continue to be actually quite good. There's some elevated level of Stress, but it's on a relative basis still, you know, below what we saw pre-pandemic. We're keeping a very close eye on it. We've got, you know, new and different ways to actually track this, you know, now that so much of our business is tied to digital interaction with customers, et cetera. We've got good tools to stay ahead of that and to guide us relative to whatever stress points might be evolving. Thank you. Thank you. As a reminder, that is star one to ask a question. Our next question will come from Smedes Rose with Citi. Your line is open. Oh, hi. Thanks. I just wanted to ask you if you have, if you've seen any changes kind of in the supply outlook and if you maybe just have any insight into kind of developers', you know, ability to access capital these days? Yes, Smedes. You know, I mentioned that in my opening remarks. We've, you know, had the benefit, nationally, where deliveries have been, somewhat static, for the last two years. We're looking at 2023 in very similar fashion relative to likely, you know, not an elevated uptick in overall deliveries. It ties to the amount of complication from a cost standpoint. There's more risk with, you know, many of the unknowns coming into the economy and, you know, the complications tied to just getting approvals as you go through step-by-step development processes. The overall supply picture is actually very good, meaning, we're not seeing, you know, a rush to new development. Our lens through our third-party development platform, you know, gives us a little bit more validation of that as well, where the majority of those opportunities are tied to development, and we're keeping even a closer eye on that beyond what our day-to-day development team and our real estate team is seeing, you know, as we're out either acquiring or looking for development opportunities. Hopefully, fingers crossed, we're gonna continue to see that amount of deliveries through 2023 and going forward. You know, again, either in the same range, or it could actually be a slightly, you know, downtick, but we'll continue to track that. Okay, thanks. I'm just wondering sort of big picture, when you just look back over your long history at other periods of economic weakness and recessions, you know, and so maybe as we potentially head into one now, are there, like, kind of two or three things that you would, you know, you might do differently at this from a strategic perspective of what you've, you know, had done in prior recessions, like either on the occupancy or the pricing front, or are there maybe more people on auto pay now than there were then, which I would think kind of helps? You know, I'm just kind of interested in any kind of color you have given, you know, the company's been around, you know, 50 years now, I guess. Well, you know, again, cycle to cycle, we continue to take away best practices, different strategies, different ways to buffer and build upon not only our strengths, but it goes to the core of our platform and the resiliency that we see relative to, you know, those types of ebbs and flows of overall economic stress, et cetera. The, you know, the things that we're, you know, constantly doing is, you know, running the business on a very fluid basis. We've got more data now than clearly we've ever had. I mentioned our move-in and move-out volume, for instance, and then the amount of, again, testing that we do relative to pricing, whether it's marketing, whether it's promotions, all the tools that we have that are, you know, far more tied to analytical processes that can, again, guide us to optimization. We've got great tools, we've got great reconnaissance, and we think that we've got, you know, even deeper technologies that we continue to make, you know, very strong investments into that have served us well. We've actually, you know, in a whole variety of different ways, you know, been able to test those in and out of, again, economic cycles. We're gonna continue to do just that. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question will come from Keegan Carl with Wolfe Research. Your line is open. Yes. Maybe starting off with a bigger picture question here, but when we think back to your May 2021 investor deck, you guys forecasted a long-term growth range of 6.7%-9.2% on FFO. Just kind of curious, is that still in play going forward, or do you anticipate growth to continue to moderate? Looking back at that investor presentation, we broke out the different engines of growth, as I recall. There's a number of them that I'll talk through here, and I appreciate the question. I think the first one around longer-term storage growth rates and the building blocks, certainly we've had a couple of years of really incredible strong growth. We're talking about a year now where we're getting back towards trending towards those longer-term averages. One of the components of that engines of growth formula was the operational improvements and enhancements that we walked through. I spoke earlier around operating model transformation and the energy efficiency things that we're doing today that are benefiting our same store NOI growth. The, the investor community got to hear from our revenue management and data science team, which to Joe's point just a moment ago, we continue to test and implement new systems and new approaches. We have, you know, over one million move-ins and over one million rental rate increases a year. That is an ability to continue to fine-tune those processes. We think that's certainly intact. I think going through the other ones, the portfolio growth, there's no question that cost of capital has changed from the time when we walked through that deck. I think that there's certainly some components of that that are going to change from one year to another. Certainly, we've allocated a significant amount of capital over the last several years. Last year was more in line with our expectations that were set out at Investor Day. Complementary growth and leverage and other were the other components that led to that FFO growth outlook, and I think those are still absolutely intact as we continue to grow our tenant reinsurance platform, the third-party management business that Joe spoke to, our investment in InsureGuard, and the benefit that we receive from that on down the list. In summary, you know, many of those factors are very much still in play and continue to push on our competitive advantages to drive that growth. I think the portfolio growth is the one that's gonna ebb and flow more from one year to another. Got it. I'll throw another tough one out here. You know, if we just think through the pandemic and, you know, the subsequent demand tailwind, you know, how many first-time users do you think utilize self-storage, and how sticky do you guys expect these customers ultimately to be? You know, we're just trying to sit here and reconcile where demand could level out, given your prior commentary where you don't necessarily anticipate any meaningful occupancy gain. The first part of the question around new first-time users, no question, there was a significant influx of new storage users through the pandemic. We've spoken a lot around different use cases as well, right? The combination of a surge in home sale activity during a part of the last several years, now a decline in home sale activity, a change to hybrid work, and a big pickup in home improvement activity that drove new first-time users of storage, and frankly, the fact that people were spending a lot more time in their homes. We do think that's a tailwind as we move forward over time. As you think about the adoption of storage, it's continued to grow from a smaller base in the 1970s to where it is today. We're encouraged by those first-time users, the younger users that continue to seek storage as a good value, to store their goods and do think that that is a tailwind for the industry moving forward. Thanks, guys. Thank you. Our next question will come from Michael Mueller with JP Morgan. Your line is open. Yeah. Hi. I think you mentioned the record length of stay, and I was wondering first, can you just throw out the stats in terms of the percentage of customers there over a year and over two years? Sure. First, though, I'll mention the metric that we like to communicate, which is the average tenure of the in-place tenants, and that's sitting right around 37 months today. We've spoken in the past around how that's up from, call it, 32, 33 months up, going back several years. No question, a continued benefit of the longer length of stay as we sit here today. Joe highlighted that in his prepared remarks. Specifically to your question around, well, segmenting the different tenure bands, we still today have over 60%, I think it's 61%-62% of the customers have been with us for longer than a year. Longer than two years is a very healthy, call it 43%-44%, as we sit here today. Continue to see pretty healthy trends there from the sticky existing tenant customer base, and that's something we're obviously watching closely and continue to be encouraged by. Got it. Okay. I guess going to, not drilling down on the same-store guidance, but you talked about the recession scenario versus soft landing. If you do head down that recession scenario, would you envision taking the foot off of the gas on development starts at all, or probably not? Yeah. Mike, the, you know, the development cycle is long. You know, I mentioned you've got to have the fortitude, particularly in environments or macroeconomic cycles that would and are actually persuading others to not pursue development. We still think that that's a very good opportunity for us, as I mentioned, to go out and capture even better land sites in some cases or with our own view and financial capabilities and, you know, basically, you know, view of the, you know, the longer term value creation, we can see through cycles like this, and in many cases, it actually can lead us to opportunities we might not otherwise see. That's the benefit of, again, having our, you know, deep-seated knowledge, you know, our very entrenched, you know, development and real estate teams nationally out looking for sites and then, you know, getting into all of the complications of getting entitlements, approvals, et cetera, and then going through construction processes. There's been, and we don't see, you know, any immediate relief to the amount of inflationary pressures that have come through just component costs, whether it's steel or lumber or, you know, anything tied to oil, et cetera. You know, there's a lot of risk that continues to evolve into the development business. We think that we have uniquely the ability to see through cycles, and we look and make sure that we've got enough bandwidth, even in our own underwriting, to give us, you know, very good capability of not only hitting our expected returns, but hopefully exceeding them, particularly if market corrections happen through, again, these ebbs and flows and market cycles. We're always looking and trying to assess what the near and longer term market dynamics are, but we've got the fortitude to do that. Got it. Thanks. Thank you. Thank you. This concludes the question and answer portion of our call, and I would now like to turn the call back to Ryan Burke for any additional or closing remarks. Thank you, Chelsea, and thanks to all of you for joining us. Have a great day. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude the Public Storage fourth quarter and full year 2022 earnings call. We appreciate your participation, and you may disconnect at any time.