Welcome everyone to the first quarter 2023 Phillips 66 earnings conference call. My name is Sierra, and I will be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Jeff Dietert, Vice President of Investor Relations. Jeff, you may begin. Good morning, and welcome to Phillips 66 first quarter earnings conference call. Participants on today's call will include Mark Lashier, President, CEO, Kevin Mitchell, CFO, Brian Mandell, Marketing and Commercial, Tim Roberts, Midstream and Chemicals, and Rich Harbison, Refining. Today's presentation material can be found on the investor relations section of the Phillips 66 website, along with supplemental financial and operating information. Slide two contains our safe harbor statement. We will be making forward-looking statements during today's call. Actual results may differ materially from today's comments. Factors that could cause actual results to differ are included here, as well as in our SEC filings. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mark. Thanks, Jeff. Good morning. Thank you for joining us today. During the first quarter, we delivered strong financial and operating results. We had adjusted earnings of $2 billion or $4.21 per share, a record first quarter. In refining, we successfully executed major planned maintenance and ran above industry average rates. Currently, our refineries are running at high utilization to meet demand and capture market opportunities as we enter summer driving season. We returned $1.3 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. In February, we raised our dividend 8% to $1.05 per share, demonstrating our ongoing commitment to a secure, competitive, and growing dividend. Our integrated diversified portfolio provides us with the ability to generate strong cash flow, return substantial cash to shareholders, and invest in the most attractive projects. We remain committed to operating excellence and disciplined capital allocation as we execute our strategy. Recently, our midstream refining and chemicals business were recognized for their exemplary safety performance in 2022. For the third consecutive year, Midstream was awarded the American Petroleum Institute's Distinguished Pipeline Safety Award for large operators. This is the highest recognition by API for the midstream industry. The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers recognized five of our refineries for outstanding safety performance. Sweeny Refinery received the Distinguished Safety Award for the second year in a row. Bayway, Borger, Santa Maria, and Ponca City Refineries also earned safety awards. In chemicals, four CPChem facilities were recognized with AFPM Safety Awards. We're honored to receive these awards and would like to recognize our employees' commitment to operating excellence. Congratulations to all the people working at these facilities. Well done. We started the year off well and continued to advance strategic priorities from our Investor Day late last year. Slide four summarizes progress toward our targets to create value and increase shareholder distributions. Since July 2022, we've returned $3.7 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. We're on track to meet our target to return $10 billion-$12 billion over the 10-quarter period between July 2022 to year-end 2024. We had strong refining operational performance in the first quarter, and market capture increased to 93%. In Midstream, we're advancing our NGL well head to market strategy. We recently achieved an integration milestone with the transition of DCP Midstream employees to Phillips 66, enabling continued synergy capture. In anticipation of the DCP buy-in, we issued bonds and executed a delayed draw term loan. We expect to close on the transaction by the end of the second quarter. We're advancing our business transformation initiatives, and we're on track to deliver $1 billion of annual run rate savings by year-end. Next quarter, we'll provide a more detailed update on the cost savings achieved through the first half of the year. In refining, we're converting our San Francisco Refinery into one of the world's largest renewable fuels facilities. The conversion will substantially reduce emissions from the facility and produce lower carbon intensity transportation fuels. In February, we safely shut down the Santa Maria facility as we continued to advance the project. We expect to begin commercial operations in the first quarter of 2024. Upon completion, Rodeo will have over 50,000 barrels per day of renewable fuels production capacity. In chemicals, CPChem is pursuing a portfolio of high return projects, enhancing its asset base and optimizing its existing operations. This includes construction of a second world-scale 1-hexene unit in Old Ocean, Texas, and the expansion of propylene splitting capacity at its Cedar Bayou facility. Both projects are expected to start up in the second half of 2023. CPChem and QatarEnergy are jointly building world-scale petrochemical facilities on the U.S. Gulf Coast and in Ras Laffan, Qatar, with startup at each facility expected in 2026. We look forward to continuing to update you on our strategic priorities. Now, I'll turn the call over to Kevin to review the financial results. Thank you, Mark, and hello, everyone. Starting with an overview on slide five, we summarize our financial results for the first quarter Adjusted earnings were $2 billion or $4.21 per share. The $12 million decrease in the fair value of our investment in NOVONIX reduced earnings per share by $0.02. We generated operating cash flow of $1.2 billion, including a working capital use of $1.3 billion and cash distributions from equity affiliates of $369 million. Capital spending for the quarter was $378 million, including $228 million for growth projects. We returned $1.3 billion to shareholders through $486 million of dividends and $800 million of share repurchases. We ended the quarter with 459 million shares outstanding. Moving to slide 6. This slide highlights the change in adjusted results by segment from the fourth quarter to the first quarter. During the period, adjusted earnings increased $66 million, mostly due to higher results in chemicals and lower corporate costs, partially offset by a decrease in marketing and specialties. Slide seven shows our Midstream results. First quarter adjusted pre-tax income was $678 million, compared with $674 million in the previous quarter. Transportation contributed adjusted pre-tax income of $270 million, up $33 million from the prior quarter. The increase was primarily driven by seasonally lower operating costs. NGL and other adjusted pre-tax income was $420 million compared to $448 million in the fourth quarter. The decrease was mainly due to the impact of declining commodity prices in the gathering and processing business. The fractionators at the Sweeny Hub continued to run above nameplate capacity, averaging 554,000 barrels per day. The Freeport LPG export facility loaded a record 282,000 barrels per day in the first quarter. Turning to chemicals on slide eight. Chemicals had first quarter adjusted pre-tax income of $198 million compared with $52 million in the previous quarter. The increase was mainly due to improved margins from lower feedstock costs, higher sales volumes and decreased utility costs. The industry polyethylene chain margin increased by $0.10 -$0. 17 per pound during the quarter. Global O&P utilization was 94% for the quarter. Turning to refining on slide nine. Refining first quarter adjusted pre-tax income was $1.6 billion, down $18 million from the fourth quarter. The impact of lower volumes from turnaround activities was mostly offset by higher realized margins and lower utility costs. Our realized margins increased by 5% to $20.72 per barrel, while the composite 3-2-1 market crack decreased by 5%. In the first quarter, turnaround costs were $234 million, crude utilization was 90%, and clean product yield was 83%. Slide 10 covers market capture. The market crack for the first quarter was $22.39 per barrel, compared to $23.58 per barrel in the fourth quarter. Realized margin was $20.72 per barrel and resulted in an overall market capture of 93%, up from 84% in the previous quarter. Market capture is impacted by the configuration of our refineries. We have a higher distillate yield and a lower gasoline yield than the 3-2-1 market indicator. During the first quarter, the distillate crack decreased $19 per barrel and the gasoline crack increased $7 per barrel. Losses from secondary products of $2.56 per barrel were $1.03 per barrel lower than the previous quarter due to falling crude prices. Our feedstock advantage of $2.34 per barrel was $2.37 per barrel improved compared to the fourth quarter, primarily due to running more advantaged crudes. The other category improved realized margins by $2.19 per barrel. This category includes freight costs, clean product realizations and inventory impacts. First quarter was $1.73 per barrel higher than the previous quarter, primarily due to improved clean product realizations. Moving to slide 11. Marketing and specialties had a solid quarter reflecting stronger than typical first quarter margins. Adjusted first quarter pre-tax income was $426 million compared with $539 million in the prior quarter, mainly due to lower international marketing margins. On slide 12, the corporate and other segment had adjusted pre-tax costs of $248 million, $32 million lower than the prior quarter. The improvement was mainly due to higher interest income and recognition of a transfer tax on a foreign entity reorganization in the fourth quarter of 2022. Slide 13 shows the change in cash during the first quarter. We started the quarter with a $6.1 billion cash balance. Cash from operations was $2.5 billion, excluding working capital. There was a working capital use of $1.3 billion, mainly reflecting an increase in inventory, partially offset by a decrease in our net accounts receivable position. During the quarter, we issued $1.25 billion of senior unsecured notes in support of the pending buy-in of DCP Midstream's publicly held common units. We funded $378 million of capital spending and returned $1.3 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. Our ending cash balance was $7 billion. This concludes my review of the financial and operating results. Next, I'll cover a few outlook items for the second quarter. In chemicals, we expect the second quarter global O&P utilization rate to be in the mid-nineties. In refining, we expect the second quarter worldwide crude utilization rate to be in the mid-nineties and turnaround expenses to be between $100 million and $120 million. We anticipate second quarter corporate and other costs coming between $260 million and $290 million, reflecting higher interest costs. In March, we issued senior unsecured notes of $1.25 billion and entered into a delayed draw term loan of up to $1.5 billion in support of the DCP Midstream buy-in transaction, which is expected to close during the second quarter. We will open the line for questions. Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. As we open the call for questions, as a courtesy to all participants, please limit yourself to one question and a follow-up. If you have a question, please press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you wish to be removed from the queue, please press the pound key. If you're using a speakerphone, you may need to pick up your handset first before pressing the numbers. Once again, if you have a question, please press star then one on your touch-tone phone. Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs, your line is open. Please go ahead. Good morning, team. The first question is around refining utilization. It was better than expected in the quarter, and the guide for Q2 also looks a little bit better. Could you talk about what improvements that you're making on the ground? It's been a choppy 18 months in refining from a utilization standpoint. What conviction can you provide the market that we've turned the corner here? Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Neil. This is Rich. Good question. It's a number of things coming together here for us. You know, back in November, we outlined a number of opportunities to improve refining's performance. One of them was asset availability. Optimizing our turnaround durations, we've done a really good job executing those in a pretty heavy turnaround quarter for us. That's a big component of allowing us to operate at that 90% crude unit utilization. It's really executing those turnarounds in a very high-performing status. On the Gulf Coast, our assets performed very well. They increased their crude flexibility that also allowed us to open up the utilization window and also allowed us to capture additional market as well, which you saw as well, the refining market capture rate of 93% was very good for the quarter as well. The key assets there are, you know, running the assets, focusing on what we can control in our business, Neil, and that is executing our turnarounds well. We were able to do that coming in below guidance this year or this first quarter, continuing a trend that started last year with us coming in below guidance. Yeah. Neil, this is Mark. I just come over with a little bit, relating that back to the Investor Day commitments that we made those commitments based on the groundwork that had been underway for some time, the fairly small projects that we were going through, the blocking and tackling that we were taking on. We're really starting to see those come to fruition now. We're pleased with what we're seeing out there. Really, I think the biggest impact of business transformation has been the hearts and minds of our employees. They are all in. It wasn't that way a year ago when we first started the initiative, but now, they see the things that they're doing, the hard work that they're doing are starting to impact their results and turnarounds, starting to impact the operational effectiveness of the plants as well as they're seeing it in the costs. That's just been a very virtuous cycle for our employees. There's a, there's a stronger competitive edge out there, and they really wanna own their future now. Rich, you wanna talk about some of the projects that were completed last year? Yeah. I think that plays into the refining capture rate of 93% for the quarter for us. You know, last year, we actually implemented 12 projects focused on market capture. The result of the impact of those projects is a 1.2% improvement in market capture with mid-cycle pricing assumptions. We implemented $225 million worth of projects. The net return on those or the EBITDA generation for that investment was $158 million at mid-cycle pricing. 2023, we actually have an additional 18 projects identified that are in flight. The estimate is a 1.4% improvement in market capture. I think, Neil, what you're seeing here is the plan we laid out in November is starting to really come to the bottom line of the performance of the refining. Thanks. That's a lot of good color there. The second question is around the decline we've seen in crude prices. That should manifest itself in different parts across the business. I would love any perspective on how we can think about it from a modeling perspective, specifically around marketing, which tends to be a tailwind. Capture rates, declining crude prices tends to help secondary products, but also can be a headwind for working capital. If the crude price decline sustains, how should we think about that in terms of Q2 movements? Thank you. Well, let me start, Neil. This is Brian, talking about Marketing and Probably noticed we had very strong marketing earnings in Q1. Pretty happy about that. You know that we have a geographic, diverse portfolio with assets both here in the U.S. and Western Europe, which is great. We also market through a number of channels, wholesale, branded and retail. What we've been doing is trying to focus our sales on the higher margin parts of our business, particularly in retail. We purchased retail in the past few years. In fact, in mid-2019, we had 50 retail JV stores in the U.S., now we have 1,000 retail JV stores in the U.S. We also spent some time re-imaging all of our stores to get higher margins in business. I would also say that in the lubes business that it's also performing quite strongly in both base oils and finished products. As you mentioned, as spot prices come off, that generally benefits the marketing business because marketing margins generally or marketing prices generally fall slower. Yeah, on the refining side, as you framed up the question, Neil, it's the flat price drop in a crude does reduce, usually the secondary products losses. They tend to tighten up a little bit there, so that has a positive impact for us in refining. Really in refining, it's for us, it's the differential that we make our money off of on the light, heavy, sweet differential and, that's what we keep a close eye on. Kevin, any additional color to add there? Neil, just on the working capital impact, as you highlighted with the declining prices, we will have a working capital hurt because we're in a net payables position. You think about a system that's essentially 2 million barrels per day and a longer duration on the payables outstanding than on the receivables. The approximate rule of thumb is somewhere in the order of $40 million-$50 million of working capital hurt per $1 of price reduction. That assumes that the crude and the products move together and the crack stays at the same level. As you know also, there's a lot of other moving parts in working capital, what's happening to inventories and so on. As a rule of thumb, simple rule of thumb, you can use that $40 million-$50 million per $1 movement in price. Okay, that's really helpful. Thanks, everyone. Thanks, Neil. Doug Leggate with Bank of America. Your line is now open. You may proceed. Thanks everyone for getting me on. Guys, I wanna ask a follow-up to Neil's question on the capture rate. I mean, obviously reliability was a bit of a question mark over the past year. Should we now think about this level of capture rate? Should we anticipate that that's kind of a new normal? If I could risk just a bolt on to that, the same kind of seems to be true of the cost-cutting progress. It looks like you're a little bit ahead of schedule there. As we wrap it all together, the earnings power of the business overall, it looks like you're kind of past the hump and trending higher. I just wonder if you could kind of characterize whether we're thinking about that the right way. Great questions, Doug. I'll let Rich address the capture rate. I'll come back in on the cost-cutting progress. You know, capture rate has a lot of moving parts to it, so it's very difficult to predict that, you know, the configuration component of it, secondary products, feedstock costs, others. You know, back to focusing on what we control in our business, Doug, is, you know, we're seeing continued maturity in our reliability programs, and these saves are coming on a regular basis where we're catching issues early and preventing larger events from occurring. Also under asset availability, as I mentioned earlier, the turnaround execution is going very well for us. We've significantly improved our predictability on this. This takes a lot of legwork over time to improve those processes. Most importantly, even though, you know, we're hitting our turnaround execution goals, we are continuing to complete all the necessary work to operate the equipment safely and reliably over time. That program is, you know, continuing to mature. We'll continue to see that, and that will allow our utilization rates to be available to operate in the market if the market is there. Then, as you mentioned, the cost side of it is a big component of this as well. You know, we have a clear path that we've identified reducing our costs by $500 million by the end of this year on a run rate basis. Over half of the $400 million run rate cost savings that Kevin mentioned in his comments are coming out of refining. That's good news for us. Probably more importantly, as Mark has indicated, our entire organization is uncovering opportunities to lower costs. We're being much more efficient in how we work and accepting the challenge to improve the business, which all should directionally support improved market capture and utilization. Thanks, Rich. Doug, we've really come a long way on the business transformation effort. It was a heavy lift, a major focus really for the last 18 months or so, and we're seeing great progress. We beat our goal of $500 million by year-end of 2022, and we're accelerating right into 2023, hitting over more than $600 million in the first quarter. As I mentioned in our comments, we'll take you on a tour of those realized savings at the second quarter call. You know, We're excited. The organization's excited. We've made major changes in the structure of the organization that eliminates a lot of inefficiencies. We've got feedback loops that we've put in place to make sure that these savings are real and that they're sustainable. And we're seeing it, and people have bought in. We're using some really state-of-the-art tools to make sure that we're capturing what we think we're capturing and delivering those results to the bottom line. You know, it's just an incredible change in the organization that we've witnessed over the last six or eight months as things start to be realized. Yeah. A lot of progress in a short period of time, Mark. I guess my follow-up is fairly predictable, and I apologize for this. Demand, one of your large competitors talked about big increases in diesel demand year-over-year and a healthy outlook for gasoline, and market doesn't seem to believe that right now. I just wonder through your marketing channels if you could share what you're seeing on both of those trends. Yeah. Doug, this is Brian. Maybe I'll talk about kind of what we're seeing in the market and that it's kind of what we're seeing in our business as well, although our volumes are somewhat off because of California flooding and because of some maintenance. Generally for U.S. gasoline, we're seeing demand better than last year, and we're seeing global demand about 3% better than last year. We're now heading to gasoline driving season, as was mentioned, with kind of the lowest U.S. gasoline inventories in almost 10 years. We're also seeing very strong octane spreads. They're about a third larger than they were first quarter of last year, at $0.27. We would expect demand to hold better than last year, particularly given that we have lower retail prices versus last year as well. On the diesel side, the year did start off weaker early in the year with a warmer winter, but has begun to firm with Midcontinent planning season. Currently, we're seeing U.S. diesel demand about 3.5% under last year. That said, you know, global distillate demand is a bit stronger than last year, and some countries are seeing particularly strong diesel demand. In Latin America, we're seeing demand at 10% over last year, in China, 4% over last year. Finally, I'd say that, in the U.S. it's been bouncing back and forth between max diesel and max gasoline. PADDs have been in max gasoline since mid-February, pretty much. PADD 1 signaled max gasoline in mid-April. This bodes well for helping to firm up distillate throughout the summer. Interesting color. We'll watch with interest, guys. Thanks so much for your answers. Thanks, Doug. Ryan Todd from Piper Sandler, please go ahead. Your line is open. Great. Thanks. Maybe, maybe you basically said that you were not gonna talk about this until next quarter, but was wondering on the cost reduction side. I mean, you've made great progress there. I mean, can you talk a little bit about where, y ou know, you've been ahead of schedule, where you've had some success there and I mean, you've already hit the $200 million, you know, kind of sustaining capital reduction target. Is there further upside to that versus your prior target? As you continue to trend ahead of schedule, have your expectations changed at all in terms of the ultimate amount of cost savings that you might find available? I'll touch a couple of those things, Ryan, at a high level, and then Kevin can drill into how the savings are distributed. Really refining has performed very well with respect to business transformation. We're seeing that. On the sustaining capital, I just wanna make it clear that that's really not an outright reduction in sustaining capital opportunities. It's becoming more efficient and more productive in how we're spending that, and we're gonna continue to do that. You'll see really that impact in any of our capital projects that we look at going forward, and we're not really capturing that. It's gonna be a continuous process to look at how to get more and more efficient around sustaining capital. We're not gonna end this adventure when we get to the end of the defined program at the end of next year, that we have outlined goals. We expect to continue to generate more savings on into 2024 and beyond. There's some things that we aren't even talking about today that require modest capital that will further enhance cost savings. We've we're instilling this as part of our culture, Ryan, and this is just going to be an ongoing march of continuous improvement, greater competitive edge. We've got 14,000 employees that wanna win out there every day, and they're highly motivated. Kevin can give you a little insight to where you're gonna see these numbers. Yeah. Thanks, Mark. As we said, over $600 million run rate at the end of the quarter. When you adjust for the fact some of that's capital from an EBITDA standpoint, it's north of $400 million run rate. As we look at the detail in the quarter, we are seeing the proportionate share of that show up. It's not necessarily obvious from the externally reported data just because of the other things happening, like consolidation of DCP into our results and so on. Of that, $400+ million run rate, half of that or even a little bit more is showing up in refining, which is where you would expect it to be, given that that's the largest spend area in the company anyway. We're doing this through a combination of organization work. We completed that last year. We're seeing that benefit flow through this quarter between the sort of centralization of some of our activities across the organization. We've done a lot of work around our processes where we've been looking for ways to standardize Simplify the way we do work, and in some cases, just eliminate work. We've optimized the sort of overall business support model around all of those activities. We continue to work on our external spend, the third-party sourcing activities and leveraging leveraging the technologies that we really put the foundation in place with Advantage 66 in terms of the digital progress we have made in those areas. A lot of different elements to that, and we'll give more specifics this time next quarter as we have the half year results available. Great. Thanks. I mean, you mentioned the importance of crude differentials to refining profitability. Can you talk a little bit? I mean, we've seen some pretty big moves on crude differentials. You know, Maya widening and then coming in some Canadian heavy differentials narrowing. Can you talk about, you know, what you're seeing out there, what your outlook is for some of these crude differentials over the remainder of this year? Sure, Ryan. This is Brian. I think overall, as you pointed out, sours gained strength since the beginning of the year. This strength was a number of factors. You have new refinery capacity in China and in Kuwait. You have new U.S. refinery additions on the Gulf Coast at Port Arthur and Galveston Bay. We had an unexpected OPEC cut, you know, 1.1 million barrels. Don't know how much of that cut will actually happen, but that's a large cut. Chinese economy has been very strong, and you can see that economy coming back with more people driving, more people flying, and then lack of sour barrels on the market. Combination of things firmed it initially, and then the market started to weaken. I will point out that even though the market has come off since Q1, when you think about the sours, it's useful to remember that while they're weak, they're still weak, but relative to historical perspective. If you're looking at Latin American sours like Castilla or Maya, they're still about $4-$6 weaker than five-year averages. Those differentials are still weaker than historical, although they firmed up some since Q1. Great. Thank you. Thanks, Ryan. Manav Gupta with UBS. You may proceed. Your line is now open. Guys, I just wanted to first touch base a little bit on the chemicals earnings seeing a strong rebound. It really helps you out. I think you have a $0.10 improvement in your chain margin. Just trying to understand from you from the demand point on the chemical side, what are you seeing and should we expect a further recovery in chemical margins given the strong global demand? Manav, this is Tim Roberts. On the chemicals front, what you've got really are, yes, we did benefit. The benefit was really related to lower advantage feedstocks, ethane, propane, butane, namely here in the United States. You saw that advantage. As those prices dropped, they became advantaged in the crack, and subsequently, that showed up in the margin. The other side of that as well is lower natural gas prices, which of course is driving that whole structure, also helped with regard to utility cost. You had lower utility costs, the better feedstock advantage, so it really helped in the quarter. You still got a supply issue and you have a demand issue. On the supply side, fundamentally, you've got more capacity that's coming on board here in the United States, so you're gonna have to work through that new capacity. The demand side is coming around, but you're still trying to work off a lot of inventory that happened as you had the supply chain disruptions out there in the marketplace. You got to work through that inventory, and you also need to see China coming back stronger. As Brian mentioned, there is some strength there in travel, driving, so some good things there. Needs to also show up in consumption on that side as well as production to meet global demand for products made out of polymers. Fundamentally, I think it's still gonna take us a little bit of time to work through those two imbalances. We're not expecting anything to happen by the end of the year, that's gonna be a significant bump. I would throw one caveat is China is a significant impact in the market. If they're clicking on all cylinders, you can see things change rapidly. At this point in time, we got an inventory to work off, and we need to see some additional demand come back, especially from Asia. Yeah. The only thing I would add, Manav, is CPChem's operations have been very strong. I think their ability to outproduce their competitors is based on their strong operations and their solid cost position, and they're delivering. In a tough environment, they're delivering and outperforming. Yeah. I do think, Mark, exactly on that point, though, is that also their product slate is geared towards consumables. Mm-hmm. You're seeing it slow up a little bit on the durables front. They don't have as much exposure to that. Perfect, guys. My quick follow-up is if we can get some updates on the progress you are making on your renewable diesels project, and hope it starts up by year-end or early 2024. Yes. Manav, we're making good progress on the project out at Rodeo. You heard me mention we shut down the Santa Maria facility, which is basically a feed prep unit for the Rodeo facility. The project is moving along. There's been lots of weather challenges out there, but the team has fought through it and dealt with it. We're looking forward to having that on in the first quarter of next year. I'll remind you that we've had a unit there operating and producing renewable diesel, what we call Unit 250, since April 2021. I'll tell you what, it's exceeded both our operating expectations and our commercial expectations. frankly, we're ready for more. We've got a great strategy out there and we are implementing and executing, and I'll let Brian touch on more of those details. Hi, Manav. Just, to follow up on Mark's point, you know, the margins that we've seen at Unit 250 since we started the unit in Q1 of 2021 have been better than we premised every single quarter. If you remember, we premised Unit 251 running a soybean oil feedstock only, but we've also run distillers' corn oil, canola oil, and pretreated used cooking oil, and we're actively blending feedstocks at the plant now. In general, just a general comment, we're seeing 3 x the volumes of low CI imports into the U.S. now than last year, and we're also seeing more crushing capacity for vegetable oils. On the marketing side of the business, we're selling almost all of our production through our branded and retail outlets directly to the end consumer. We've also sold volumes to geographic locations that offer higher credit incentives than California for some of the feedstocks. Finally, on the credit side, the LCFS programs are currently available in California, Oregon, Washington, and Canada, as you know, but we're seeing other states proposing these programs. In fact, Minnesota and Pennsylvania are two states that recently proposed an LCFS program. That's the kind of commercial side. Mark mentioned the operating side too. On the operating side, we're seeing higher than premised yields of RD at greater than 95%. We're also making 30% more renewable diesel production at the plant than we originally thought. As Mark pointed out, we're looking forward to Rodeo Renewed, and Rodeo Renewed will also have the flexibility of producing up to 10,000 barrels of renewable jet fuel with very little capital. Those are all very encouraging updates. Thank you, guys. Thanks, Manav. John Royall of J.P. Morgan, please proceed. Your line is open. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. My first one's on OpEx. Can you talk about OpEx trends in refining into the second quarter? It's an item that you don't guide to, but 1Q ticks down, presumably on lower natural gas prices, and despite higher maintenance. In 2Q, you'll have an even lower price, presumably, and less maintenance, and of course, your efforts around cost. Any color on expectations on the refining OpEx side in 2Q and going forward? John, this is Kevin. I would just say, I mean, your points are valid. We'll benefit from lower maintenance turnaround costs, and the natural gas prices are settling in at a pretty low level. So you would expect to see a drop 1Q to 2Q. We're not giving specific guidance on the number. The other side of that is utilization will be higher, so some of the variable costs you'll see a small impact from. That's a, you know, good thing. Net-net, I think you should see a small, you know, a modest sequential decline. Great. Thanks, Kevin. Just on the share buyback, in 1Q, you paced a bit ahead of your quarterly pace that you need to hit your longer-term guidance. 2Q does have an outflow from the acquisition. Should we be expecting a slowing in 2Q, and then further if the environment were to continue to deteriorate from a cracks perspective, could that impact your pacing as well? Yeah. John, I wouldn't be too concerned about buyback pace being driven by the funding the buyback because as you know, we are at a $7 billion cash balance at the end of the first quarter. We had issued the $1 and a quarter billion of notes, but we have the term loan facility which has not been drawn yet. We will draw on that as we fund the buy-in. Even all other things unchanged, we'll still have a healthy cash balance at that point in time. We're still generating cash. I think that our buyback pace should still be at a very respectable level in the second quarter. The balance sheet's in a good position. The operating cash flow is still strong. We've seen some weakening in refining margins, relative to our mid-cycle assumptions, the business is still looking really good. I'm not too concerned about the buyback pace, being impacted by the DCP buy-in. Thank you. Matthew Blair with TPH, please proceed. Your line is open. Good morning. I was hoping you could expand a little bit on the dynamics in the Central Corridor in Q1 and then heading into Q2 as well. I think you ran at 89% utilization in Q1, were Wood River and Borger still impacted by some of the issues from Q4. Then it looks like your margin capture was actually pretty good in Q1, 116%. Was that a function of wider WCS diffs? Then I guess, you know, would we expect, you know, lower margin capture in the Central Corridor heading into Q2 with narrower WCS diffs? This is Rich. Central Corridor, I think the first thing to remember is the quarter-over-quarter analysis. Fourth quarter, we had some pretty heavy headwinds with the Keystone shutdown and the winter storm effects. That's kind of sets the baseline. In the first quarter, we did see improved feedstock advantage, running the heavy crudes. More importantly, we were able to actually increase our crude slate percentage of these crudes that we were able to run. That impacted our Market capture there as well. Some of that was offset by the unplanned downtime impacts that initiated fourth quarter, carried on into the 1st quarter. That unplanned downtime, primarily at Wood River is now repaired and that facility is back up and running. We did slide one turnaround from the 1st quarter to the 1st half of the 2nd quarter. That turnaround is now wrapping up this week here. We do expect the utilization rates to get back to higher levels for the WRB assets. you know, there was other some slight turnaround impacts as well to that 1st quarter results and a little bit lower market cracks also that played into that result. That's how we see this central corridor kind of moving forward. You know, we expect our utilization rates to turn back upwards. Great. Thanks. Thanks for the comprehensive RD update. I just had one follow-up there. Could you talk about how the process is going for getting LCFS pathways? You know, some of your peers have mentioned that CARB is pretty backed up, and it's taking longer than expected. You know, as you bring on the full site, in Q1 2024, would you expect to have all your LCFS pathways at that time? Or, you know, is that a risk to the earnings contribution? This is Rich again. We anticipated this flood of activity that would occur to get these LCFS pathways approved. We've been working diligently to get these approved even ahead of the startup of the project. Any pathway that was approved for the Unit 250 operation is also applicable to the Rodeo Renewed project as well. While we are concerned, I would say, that, you know, there is a flood of applications to pathways, we think we're in a good position. That should meter into our system consistent with the startup of the project. Great. Thanks so much. Paul Cheng with Scotiabank. Please proceed. Your line is open. Hey, guys. Good morning. Hey, Paul. Mark, just, two questions. First, with the new California windfall profit penalty that being passed, how does that change your view or does it change your view about your California asset both in the refining and marketing? Yeah, Paul, you know, that's been taking up a lot of intellectual capacity for I think the entire industry since that was rushed through. You know, before that, California was a tough place to manage refining business, and I think this just makes it even a little more difficult. We're, like everyone else, working hard to understand both the intended and unintended consequences of SBX1-2. It certainly at a fundamental level creates more uncertainty, and it's gonna make it more difficult for people to step up and invest in the supply chain that the consumers need. You know, even though you've got a lot of things coming over the hill to reduce demand today, demand is strong and you can see what happens when there's disruptions, and the supply chain can be pretty tight there. It's really tough for us to see how this new law is gonna benefit the consumers at the end of the day. Mark, do you think you or the industry is going to challenge them in court? I'm not sure how if the industry has not been proven to have done anything wrong, why that will be slapped with a penalty. I think that it is logical to assume that industry associations will defend and protect the interests of the industries and even individual companies may take action. That's certainly gonna be up to each company. From an industry perspective, I think that that's an angle that's obviously being looked at. Okay. The second question, I think this is for Kevin. Kevin, you mentioned about in the refining capture in your presentation, in the upper columns, there's a very big positive. I actually went back to the last, say, four or five quarters. I think nearly without exception, that column is always a negative. There's hurting your margin, instead of, say, benefiting like what we've seen in this quarter. I think you sort of talked a bit in your prepared remarks. Can you elaborate a little bit more than what that column really represent and why we have seen such an improvement and whether those is sustainable? Yeah, Paul, the big driver of the change this quarter, especially comparing to last quarter, is around the clean product realizations or clean product differentials. That was a particular negative item in the fourth quarter because the way we do our market, the market crack for Atlantic Basin, we use a New York Harbor-based crack. The distillate crack or the jet crack was particularly strong in New York Harbor. It was weaker in Europe. Our capacity is approximately 50/50 between New York, Northeast, and Europe. Our Europe distillate production is causing a negative relative to that market. That pulls down the overall capture, and that shows up in other, w e had a little bit of a similar phenomena going on on the West Coast as well, where we use an L.A. marker for the entire West Coast, which includes Northern California and the Pacific Northwest. When those markets are out of sync with each other, that can drive differentials in our actual product realizations, and that will show up in that other. That's the biggest single driver in their fault. It was really negative impacts from in the fourth quarter. The quarter, yeah. Jason Gabelman with Cowen, please proceed, your line is now open. Hey, thanks for taking my questions. The first I wanted to ask was on kind of global refining margin structure. There are stories out there that Asian plants are cutting runs while U.S. cracks are still really healthy, $20 a barrel. The question is that a leading indicator that some of that weakness will ultimately make its way over into the U.S. via lower margins? Or, or is it an indication that the global margin environment could be at a floor because we're cutting runs somewhere? Thanks. Hey, Jason, this is Brian. I'd say that, as you know, refineries in the U.S. are advantaged relative to European and Asian refineries. As margins in Asia and Europe have begun to fall, we, like you, like you said, we're beginning to see runs trim, particularly in Korea, Taiwan and Europe. Also, China is heading this month into a turnaround season, which should, along with the low U.S. inventories and the fact that we're stepping into summer driving season, begin to help strengthen, in our opinion, global margins. Okay, great. My follow-up is on DCP, and I understand the deal isn't closed yet, but just maybe wanted to get some early indications on progress. Specifically, I think part of the rationale for the deal was the combined midstream platform of Phillips and DCP would attract more acreage to fill midstream assets within that platform and support growth there. The question is, are there any early indications that upstream companies do view this combined platform as more favorable to partner with to support future midstream growth for Phillips? Thanks. Jason, this is Tim Roberts. Yeah, a couple of things. First thing on the second part of the deal, which is the buying in the public units. We're expecting to get that done here in Q2, probably the latter portion of the second quarter, to get that completed and get that behind us and increasing our economic interest up close to 87%. The next part, as far as rationale of the deal, what we found is that those that were integrated well ahead, especially in the NGL space, well ahead to the market, were more advantaged than those that maybe only participated in a portion of the value chain, i.e. G&P, or the transportation logistics, fractionation, exports. Being able to go into a major, and being able to sell the ability to get from the wellhead all the way to the market is tough to do if you don't participate all the way there. Bringing the G&P portion of DCP together with Phillips portion, which was the transportation all the way to the dock, we think that created that infrastructure now that can go out and compete. To your question, is that showing any interest or are we having any interest percolating out there from producers who like that? The answer is yes. You know, we've had a lot of activity, and a lot of engagement, as you would expect. People want options and want alternatives, and so we're bringing a viable option and alternative, as well as the ability to get barrels out of the Houston Ship Channel and get them down to a less congested area down in the Free port swing area. Yes, it's been, so far, so good. We just need to make sure we convert those into bottom line. Great. That's really helpful. Thank you for the color. Thank you, Jason. That concludes the question and answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Mark Lashier for closing remarks. Thank you, Sierra. I just wanna recap a few key things. We had a strong start to the year. We had a solid first quarter results, and we raised the dividend and increased our share purchases, which are on a pace to deliver our target return of $10 billion-$12 billion from July of 2022 through year-end 2024. We've made great progress in refining with strong turnaround execution, improved market capture and lower costs. In midstream, just as Tim mentioned, we advanced midstream integration and we remain confident in capturing $300 million of synergies. We expect to close on the buy-in this quarter. We're progressing our business transformation initiatives, and we're on track to achieve $1 billion of annual run rate savings by year-end. We remain committed to financial strength, disciplined capital allocation, and returning distributions to our shareholders. We look forward to updating you on our progress. Thank you for all your interest in Phillips 66.