Welcome to the Second Quarter 2025 Phillips 66 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Emily, and I'll be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I'll now turn the call over to Jeff Dietert, Vice President, Investor Relations. Jeff, you may begin. Welcome to Phillips 66 Earnings Conference Call. Participants on today's call will include Mark Lashier, Chairman and CEO; Kevin Mitchell, CFO; Don Baldridge, Midstream and Chemicals; Rich Harbison, Refining; and Brian Mandell, Marketing and Commercial. Today's presentation can be found on the Investor Relations section of the Phillips 66 website, along with supplemental financial and operating information. Slide 2 contains our safe harbor statement. We will be making forward-looking statements during today's call. Actual results may differ materially from today's comments. Factors that could cause actual results to differ are included here, as well as in our SEC filings. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mark. Thanks, Jeff. Welcome, everyone, to our second quarter earnings call. We had strong financial and operating results this quarter. They're a reflection of our focused strategy, disciplined execution, and meaningful progress toward achieving our 2027 strategic priorities. Coming off our large spring turnaround program, we said we were positioned to capture a strengthening market, and we delivered. Our refining assets ran at 98% utilization, the highest since 2018. Clean product yield was over 86%. We captured 99% of our market indicator and achieved our lowest adjusted cost per barrel since 2021. Along with refining, the other parts of our integrated business delivered. Midstream generated adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1 billion. We're on track to achieve the $4.5 billion annual EBITDA target in Midstream by 2027. Marketing and Specialties reported its strongest quarter since 2022. The combination of stable contributions from Midstream and Marketing and Specialties provides a robust platform for our capital allocation framework. We returned over $900 million to shareholders this quarter. The resilience of our integrated business model drives results, delivering consistent returns to shareholders. Slide 4 shows the progress we've made in our refining business from targeted, low-capital, high-return investments and a dedication to operating excellence. Results are clear. Utilization is improving, and we're consistently above industry average. We've been setting new clean product yield records. Year- to- date, our yield is 2% higher than the previous record for the same period set in 2024. These factors have contributed to market capture improving to 99% of our published refining indicator this quarter. Year- to- date, market capture has increased 5% compared to the first half of last year. Our goal is to drive performance in any market environment while running our assets safely and reliably. The second quarter PSX market indicator was just over $11 a barrel. As a reminder, for every dollar per barrel that the indicator increases, EBITDA increases by roughly $170 million per quarter. In the second quarter, we achieved the lowest refining adjusted cost per barrel since 2021. The organization has done a fantastic job embracing a culture of continuous improvement, enabling us to more than offset inflation. By 2027, we expect to see the adjusted cost per barrel number below $5.50 per barrel on an annual basis. Midstream is a key growth driver for our company and creates ongoing value for our shareholders through reliable, long-term cash generation. Slide 5 shows the increase in quarterly average adjusted EBITDA from $500 million in 2021 to $1 billion this quarter. We reached significant milestones in the second quarter as we continue to enhance our integrated wellhead-to-market strategy. We acquired EPIC NGL, now renamed Coastal Bend, at the beginning of the quarter. We're also near completion on the capacity expansion pipeline project from 175,000 to 225,000 barrels per day. The Dos Picos II gas processing plant came online ahead of schedule and on budget at the end of the second quarter. This plant and the previously announced Iron Mesa plant are great examples of highly strategic and selective investments that enhance Midstream's return on capital employed. These projects contribute to our plan to organically grow Midstream EBITDA to $4.5 billion by 2027. Midstream is an important part of the Phillips 66 story. We're executing on our wellhead-to-market strategy, and the results are coming through. Over the past several months, we've had the opportunity to extensively engage with shareholders leading up to and following the annual shareholder meeting. These conversations provided valuable, constructive feedback on our strategic direction, along with the support of our priorities. We will remain focused on four key areas: enhancing our refining competitiveness, driving organic growth in Midstream, reducing debt, and returning over 50% of net operating cash flow to shareholders through share repurchases and a secure, competitive, and growing dividend. We've made substantial progress and remain committed to maintaining safe and reliable operations as we execute on achieving these initiatives by 2027. In the second quarter, we welcomed the addition of three new board members. As we do with all new directors, each new board member participated in a comprehensive multi-day onboarding process with a broad group of our senior leadership team, equipping them to contribute meaningfully and immediately. The extensive industry experience of our board members continues to promote thoughtful discussion and thorough evaluation of all opportunities for maximizing shareholder value. Now, I'll turn the call over to Kevin to cover the results for the quarter. Thank you, Mark. On slide 7, second quarter reported earnings were $877 million, or $2.15 per share. Adjusted earnings were $973 million, or $2.38 per share. Both the reported and adjusted earnings include the $239 million pre-tax impact of accelerated depreciation due to our plan to cease operations at the Los Angeles Refinery in the fourth quarter. We generated $845 million of operating cash flow. Operating cash flow, excluding working capital, was $1.9 billion. We returned $906 million to shareholders, including $419 million of share repurchases. Net debt to capital was 41% and reflects the impact of the acquisition of the Coastal Bend assets. We plan to reduce debt with operating cash flow and proceeds from the announced Germany and Austria retail marketing disposition, which we expect to close in the fourth quarter. I will now cover the segment results on slide 8. Total company adjusted earnings increased $1.3 billion to $973 million, compared with prior quarter's adjusted loss of $368 million. Midstream results increased mainly due to higher volumes, primarily due to the acquisition of the Coastal Bend assets. In chemicals, results decreased, mainly due to lower polyethylene margins driven by lower sales prices. Refining results increased, mainly due to higher realized margins. We came out of a high turnaround season in the first quarter, well-positioned to capture improved crack spreads. Market capture was 99%, and crude utilization was 98%. In addition, costs were lower, primarily due to the absence of first-quarter turnaround impacts. Marketing and Specialties results improved due to seasonally higher margins and volumes. In renewable fuels, results improved primarily due to higher realized margins, including inventory impacts. Slide 9 shows cash flow for the second quarter. Cash from operations, excluding working capital, was $1.9 billion. Working capital was a use of $1.1 billion, primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable from higher refined product sales in the quarter following the spring turnaround program. Debt increased primarily due to the acquisition of the Coastal Bend assets for $2.2 billion. We funded $587 million of capital spending and returned $906 million to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. Our ending cash balance was $1.1 billion. Looking ahead to the third quarter on slide 10. In chemicals, we expect the global O&P utilization rate to be in the mid-90s. In refining, we expect the worldwide crude utilization rate to be in the low to mid-90s and turnaround expense to be between $50 million-$60 million. We continue to optimize turnarounds and improve performance. We are reducing the full-year turnaround guidance by $100 million. The new guidance is $400 million-$450 million, compared to the previous guidance of $500 million-$550 million. We anticipate corporate and other costs to be between $350 million-$370 million. Now, we will move to slide 11 and open the line for questions, after which Mark will wrap up the call. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. As we open the call for questions, as a courtesy to all participants, please limit yourself to one question and a follow-up. If you have a question, please press Star, then one on your touch-tone phone. If you wish to be removed from the queue, please press Star, then two. If you are using a speakerphone, you may need to pick up the handset first before pressing the numbers. Once again, if you have a question, please press Star, then one on your touch-tone phone. Our first question today comes from Doug Leggate with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Your line is now open. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Mark, after all the drama of the last six months, quite a quarter you put up. Good to see that. I am curious, however, your last part of your prepared remarks, you said you referenced. I do not want to put words in your mouth here, but it was kind of engaging with shareholders and obviously reviewing or continuing to review the appropriate opportunities to maximize value. I guess it is a strategy question. After everything that has happened in the last six months, are you still comfortable with the forward strategy of the integrated company, or do you envisage any incremental changes in light of what you have been through the last three or four months? Yeah, Doug, it's a good, solid question. Thank you for asking that. We've been quite encouraged, frankly, by the constructive engagement we've had with all of our shareholders over the last several months. The results of the vote, we believe, reflect what's been a consistent theme in the conversations that we've had with shareholders. They understand the value inherent in the business. They recognize that our plans can provide upside as we continue to execute against them. We're fully aligned, and the shareholders agree that there's significant value in Phillips 66, and we've got to go out and capture that upside. As we always do, we continue to evaluate a wide range of strategic alternatives. Our board is very engaged in the process, constantly questioning us, is the strategy effective? Do we need to tweak it? Do we need to make major changes to it? We have a wealth of experience and talent on our Board. We've got retired chairmen, CEOs, CFOs, corporate executives that are well-established and Wall Street veterans. They constructively challenge our strategy every step of the way. As I mentioned, we've got the three new members that have been deeply immersed in an onboarding process that gives them access to all the data that they didn't have access to during the proxy season. They have a clear understanding of where we're headed, why we're headed that way, and how we can unlock value. As I've said before, there's no sacred cows. We're not ideological about anything. We are ideological about one thing, and that's shareholder value creation. Let me correct myself. At the right price and for the creation of long-term value, we'll consider any alternatives. We always, always, always are focused on the long-term value creation opportunities. I think our shareholders agree with us in that regard. I appreciate the very full answer, Mark. Thank you for that. My follow-up is, I guess I'm asking a lot of people about debt nowadays, but my follow-up is a little different, perhaps in the context of the macro. Strong quarter, $2.5 billion of EBITDA. Obviously, you're not where you want to be on Midstream, but if I annualize that at the margin environment we had, we're still obviously quite a bit shy of the $15 billion. My question is, if you had to try and normalize for today's environment, what would the $15 billion be? Meaning, rather than making an assumption on the mid-cycle, what would it be at today's environment? In other words, how far away from that are you? Assuming it is less than $15 billion, how does Kevin think about the right level of debt for the combined company as it stands today? Yeah, I think what we've said, and I would say the controversy is around putting a stake in the ground on what everybody believes that mid-cycle conditions are in refining. And so we said that based on our indicators, we see that as a $14 per barrel indicator. And so clearly, we're several dollars per barrel below away from that. That's the key driver between that and what chemicals does. We're in the bottom of the cycle for chemicals, so we've got a lot of upside in chemicals to add to that number. We've got a long way to go to get to those levels, although I would say this quarter, the gap to mid-cycle closed considerably for refining, but chemicals is still a couple of years out. Kevin, I'll turn it over to you for debt. Yeah, and just one additional point, Doug. So refining EBITDA was $867 million in the quarter. If you annualize that, you get a $3.5 billion number. That is an $11 market indicator. If you use the sensitivity to a $14 market indicator, it puts you just a little bit north of $5 billion. You can question whether you have your own view on whether $14 per barrel market indicator is the right mid-cycle, but that is what we have put out there. I would also caution, though, that this was a quarter with minimal turnaround activity. We ran extremely well. Typically, you are not going to have four quarters of that in a given calendar year, so we need to adjust for that. Fundamentally, we are in the ballpark of where we should be relative to our mid-cycle assumptions. On the debt question, I go back to what we have been saying. The $17 billion of debt on a consolidated basis, we feel, puts us in a very comfortable spot relative to not only our mid-cycle assumptions, but also in a less-than-mid-cycle environment like we are in today. Clearly, we are not at that debt level today, but we have that objective to get there over the next couple of years, and we expect to do that. We expect to accomplish that through a combination of cash generated from operations as well as proceeds from dispositions. Notwithstanding all of that, it does not compromise our ability to continue to return cash to shareholders. 50% of operating cash flow, 50% or more of operating cash flow through share repurchases and dividends. Appreciate the answers, guys. Thanks very much indeed. Thank you, Doug. Thank you. Our next question comes from Manav Gupta with UBS. Please go ahead. Good morning. I wanted to focus a little bit on the refining results. 99% capture, 98% crude utilization. I understand some of those things would be tough to replicate, but even quarter- over- quarter or year- over- year, these are remarkable achievements. Can you help us understand what helped you drive close to $1.3 billion in quarter- over- quarter improvement in refining? I know the cracks were higher, but help us walk through some of the stuff which you were able to achieve here. I think you probably are working on it for some time, but it all came together in the second quarter. Yeah, Manav, thank you. We appreciate that. As the data shows, and as we've said for the last several years in refining, we had full intention to improve refining performance, and we were with a focus on the things that we can control. That's most evident in things like the clean product yield, the utilization rate. Market capture is going to have more variability in it because of the movements in the market and crude dips and all those variables that we have less control over. We absolutely will continue to drive costs down in the areas that we can control. Things like natural gas costs may go up and down, but where we're looking at the things that we can control, we'll continue to drive those costs down where it's responsible to do so. We'll continue to fight that fight and position refining for whatever the market conditions are. We're going to be out there to capture the market that's available. I think that's what we saw in the second quarter. It's a combination of very disciplined focus over the last three years of preparing and implementing projects and executing to be able to capture that market when it's available to us. Rich can drive into more detail. Yeah, Manav, let me go a little bit, maybe a layer deeper here on this. Our mission in refining is to run the assets safely and reliably and then drive world-class performance. We do this, as Mark indicated, by managing the items we can control and then sustainably implementing change over time. Of course, the foundation for all of this is safe and reliable operations, and we are an industry leader in safety, and we have that culture in our organization that continually challenges ourselves to be the best we can be. We've also established a comprehensive reliability program that has been applied to each of our assets out there in the field, and we're measuring that success by mechanical availability. Ultimately, utilization of the assets will be the final measurement of that one. You asked a little bit about market capture. We had a fantastic quarter at 99% market capture. Even if you look at the data a little bit closer, year- over- year, year- to- date, we're showing a 5% improvement year- over- year. That sustainable improvement is what we're looking for over time. There are a couple of reasons we're able to achieve that. One is the reliability program and the impact it's having on our ability to utilize our assets. Crude utilization was at 98% for the quarter. That's actually nine out of the last 10 quarters we've been well above industry average on utilization, only interrupted by a set of turnarounds in the first quarter of this year. We've reached some record clean product yield as well at 87% for the assets. We're on pace this quarter also to meet that and potentially exceed it. This is a reflection of what I've been talking about over the last three years, which is the execution of these small capital, high-return projects. They've improved both our clean product yield as well as driven flexibility into the system. We've increased our ability to produce gasoline, diesel, and jet and swing between those three components. We've also improved our flexibility to process light and heavy crudes without losing capacity in the overall system. There's no better example of this than at our Sweeny Complex, where we recently completed the sour crude flex project, we call it. This project actually increased our ability to process light crude by three times the historic volume in the largest crude unit at the site. It's reduced our dependence on waterborne crudes, and it also takes advantage of the integration of the site with the midstream NGLs and CP Chem feedstock generation with increased light ends production. We see nice improvement with market capture with that project as well. We've also been driving the inefficiencies out of the business. I think this is also a big important part of refining performance, and we've been managing the fundamental difference here that we've been doing. As an organization is managing the assets as a fleet versus a set of independent operations. That has really opened up our ability to drive inefficiencies out of the business. We have removed well over a dollar per barrel out of the system. We saw a really good number of $5.46 in the second quarter. We are striving to be below $5.50 on an annualized basis as our goal. The key thing quarter- over- quarter was really higher utilization for the assets. We had a set of turnarounds in the first quarter. We had a 17% increase in volume in the second quarter. That improvement really drove the dollar per barrel cost down. If you look underneath that even a little bit more, the operating costs for the assets were flat quarter- over- quarter with the exception of the turnarounds. That base cost is still there. It is fixed. We are able to operate the assets well. It is a little bit subject, as Mark indicated, to the natural gas price that is moving around a little bit on us right now, which drives a dollar per barrel as well. We are making some portfolio management changes with the Los Angeles Refinery. Let me kind of wrap this up. We have made good progress. We are not done. We will continue to focus on and drive these strategies. I think, Manav, if you look at it over time, you see this trend. The steady drumbeat of improvement that has occurred in the refining system. That means our processes of changing are really sustainably implemented. Most importantly, the people, our organization, our people have proven that we are willing to take on the hard work of change and put it in place and capture the opportunities over time. Yeah, I just want to echo Rich's closing comments there, whether it is refining, marketing, commercial, midstream, or back office. Across the board, we have got a company full of people that are humble enough to know we can always do it better. We are driven to do it better. We have got the competitive mindset to do it better and to get up and do it better each and every day. That is what is going to make this sustainable, and that is going to continue to improve those metrics that you have seen across the board. Thanks for the question. Thank you, guys. I'll be a quick follow-up. Very strong results from M&S, better than our expectations, even if we deduct the $89 million one time. Help us understand some of the dynamics there. Now that you have sold these assets, what would be a good run rate of EBITDA normalized for this business? Yeah, Manav, it's Kevin. Yeah, very strong results in the quarter, $660 million, as you highlighted. We had about $100 million benefit in the quarter that was really timing with an offset in the first quarter. You'd call that a sort of one-time effect, if you like. As we look at the results, we had higher volumes as the refining system came out of turnarounds and the seasonal effect on demand, as well as stronger margins, which likewise, you have a seasonal driver there. Also, just the nature of the way the product prices moved over the course of the quarter, falling prices tended to help that on the margin front. As you look ahead to the third quarter, we would expect to be at a more sort of normal level for the business in the third quarter, which is somewhere in the order of $450 million-$500 million of earnings is where we'd expect that to be. Your other component to the question on the disposition, we haven't closed that disposition yet. We expect that to happen in the fourth quarter. That will reduce EBITDA by about $50 million per quarter with that disposition of the 65% interest in our Germany and Austria business. Thank you so much for the responses. It was great to see Mark on CNBC this morning. Thank you. Thanks, Manav. Thank you. Our next question comes from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Yeah, good morning, good afternoon. I've been spending some time chatting with Mr. Dietert about global refining balances. There's a healthy debate in the market over the next couple of years about how you guys are thinking about net capacity adds. Also, the swing factor of China, which obviously has excess export capacity, but it's been pretty disciplined about product quotas. We just love your bottoms-up view of how you think about those net adds over the next couple of years. Hey, Neil, this is Brian. I would say that net refinery additions are low for us as far out as we forecast, certainly through the end of the decade. That is before you even start thinking about unplanned shutdowns. We had Lindsey, U.K. Refinery, announce that they are shutting down or in the process of shutting down, last week or this week. We expect more of those coming in the system. Also, some of the refineries, as you pointed out, particularly in Asia, they are pet chem focused. When you are thinking about crude, you really have to think about clean product yields. Those are very low clean product yields, 30%-35% clean product yields. I would say bottom line is with the net additions below demand expectations, we see a very strong margin environment. Thanks, Brandon. Just follow up on the cash flow, Doug's question about just debt levels being about 10-11 points higher than where you want it to be. Can you just talk about two dynamics? Working capital, there was a $1.1 billion outflow, but I would think that swings back in the back half. If you could just talk about what drove that and how you think that evolves. And then the jet sale, because between those two nuts, I think you can close a lot of the gap that you need to get to the $17 billion level. Yeah, Neil, it's Kevin. You're right on both fronts. The working capital, $1.1 billion use of cash, as you highlighted, that was predominantly due to increased accounts receivables. As you think about the end of the first quarter where utilization was much lower, we're still just wrapping up the heavy turnaround activity versus the end of June where we're running full. Production and sales are significantly higher. That creates a build in accounts receivable. That's the biggest single component to the move in working capital. There's also some inventory impact on the NGLs as we build for the sort of seasonal trade on that. Over the course of the year, we would expect a benefit of working capital, probably more fourth-quarter item than a third-quarter item because the receivables component that I mentioned, you'd expect that to continue at the same sort of levels through the third quarter. Come fourth quarter, you'll see the normal inventory reductions that will take place and probably some modest benefit on the receivables payables front. Do expect that to come back, expect the cash proceeds in the fourth quarter, EUR 1.5 billion, $1.6 billion. You put that together and we'll make some significant inroads towards the debt target. Makes sense. Thanks, Kevin. Thank you. Our next question comes from Jason Gabelman with TD Cowen. Please go ahead, Jason. Yeah. Hey, thanks for taking my question. I wanted to go back to kind of how you're thinking about the business after the activism campaign that you endured. There was a lot of focus on that midstream part of the business. I'm wondering if the company is thinking about doing a deep dive on that segment and the structure that makes sense in any way that would be different than how you kind of evaluate that business in normal course through the year. Absolutely. We've done that in the past. We'll continue to do that. We will look to see if anything has changed. We will engage with industry experts to make sure that we're thinking about it the right way. Certainly, we'll lay it all out for our board to drive to the right conclusion. As I said earlier, nothing is off the table. It's got to create long-term value for our shareholders. Full stop. Great. Thanks. My follow-up is just on a couple of weaker segments, chems and renewable fuels. On chems, just want to know if your outlook for when we reach mid-cycle in that industry has changed at all. Then renewable fuels, given margins where they are, do you consider tapering back runs there? Just kind of outlook for margins in general would be great. Thanks. Yeah, I'll grab the chemicals question. Second quarter was particularly problematic when you think about the disruptions that tariffs caused. At one point, the Chinese had imposed punitive tariffs of 100% on polyethylene imports. And CP Chem has really minimized its exposure to China. All of that material that was flowing into China got pushed back into the world market. That was a big challenge this quarter. Our longer-term view is still consistent. You're seeing rationalization in Europe. You're seeing rationalization rumored in Asia. I think you're starting to see capitulation of those players that need to take assets off the table. That'll be constructive. We continue to see things firming up throughout 2026 into 2027 and beyond without a lot of new capacity coming on, other than what CP Chem and Qatar Energy are bringing to the table. Again, CP Chem fares relatively well versus their competitors because of the advantaged ethane position they have both on the Gulf Coast and in the Middle East. The high-density polyethylene volumes continue to be strong. They can run at high rates because demand for that product continues to grow. It's really a very resilient product. Their cost position allows them to continue to operate profitably. They've built out a strong competitive position that's passing the test of time as others are showing weakness. Hey, Jason, it's Brian. On the renewable front. Renewable margins are indeed weak, and they were weaker in the second quarter slightly than the first quarter. We are running at reduced rates. In the second quarter, we went at reduced rates, and we continue to run at reduced rates. Maybe I'll give you some color and tailwinds and headwinds in the regulatory and in the renewable segment in general. As you know, there's been a number of regulatory changes for 2026. And a number of those are headwinds for the plants, including limiting the eligible feed stocks for PTC credits to those from North America and also in reducing the premium for sustainable aviation fuel. While we also have RVO obligations that support what they have renewed, other policies included in the RVO, such as that reduced RIN generation for renewable fuels derived from imported feed stocks, will present a challenge. We're doing a lot of things in self-help, including talking to state and federal regulators to promote profitability for the plant. Additionally, we're working very hard on lowering the cost of operating the plant, just like Rich has done in the refining segment. We're focused on this plant as well. We're thinking about how to adjust operations to increase SAF production and also to provide additional optionality for feed stocks. I'd say also there are some tailwinds we see in the market, potentially stronger LCFS and RIN credits with the tighter regulations. European markets are driving greater incentives, including Germany. We've been exporting to Europe almost every month this year. There are stronger biofuels programs in Oregon and Washington and stronger Canadian markets as well. I would say just in summary, Rodeo Renewed, as you know, is one of the world's largest RD and SAF plants. We can also generate up to 15% of the country's D4 and D5 RINs. Ensuring profitability for the plant will be important for energy supply, for affordable energy across the country given the RIN generation, and for energy dominance in the United States. Yeah, I would just add to that. It's clear that the losses are unacceptable and unsustainable. This is, as Brian noted, a strategic asset, not just for us, but for the country and for the whole RIN program. It's important, as well as the volume of diesel that it produces and its capability to produce sustainable aviation fuel to meet a lot of the policies that are underway. We are fully engaged at the federal level and fully engaged at the state level in California to make sure that all the right choices are made to support this strategic asset. Great. Thanks for the answers. Thank you. Our next question comes from Jean Ann Salisbury with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Hi. I have a midstream question. Obviously, the top concern right now across Permian volume levered midstream is the falling rig count in the Permian and whether growth could materially slow there next year. Can you talk about PSX's exposure to potentially slowing growth in the Permian and how you might actually be less exposed than some peers in the medium term given your high share of contracted third-party volumes? Hi, Jean Ann. Yeah, this is Don. A couple of things around the Permian outlook. We do stay very close with our producer customers. Currently, we see not a significant change in their plans based on where we are from a pricing standpoint and what their drilling activity looks like. One of the things I think you have to realize, though, is the NGL content in the new production is higher than the old production. Even when you see some tampering or dampening of the volume growth in crude, you're still seeing good, robust growth on the gas and NGL side because of the higher GOR from the wells that are being drilled. That certainly creates some buffer when you see some rig count changes or see a change in producer plans. As you mentioned, our volume outlook is supported both by our G&P processing volumes as well as a robust third-party contract portfolio. Based on the conversations we were having across the board, we still have good confidence in the outlook of the volumes coming through our system, seeing our utilization rates continuing to stay high. We're turning on expansion at Coastal Bend, and volumes continue to grow and fill that capacity. I feel like we're in good shape there. Great, Don. Thanks for that color. As a broader follow-up, I think in the most recent PSX deck, there were a lot of examples of the $500 million of operating synergies from integration. Can you just kind of speak high-level, directionally, I guess, on what environments cause those operating synergies to be higher? For example, is it just when there's better refining and chems margins, do those numbers go up too, or perhaps in more volatile environments, the operating synergies go up? Is it just more of a steady state number as you guys look at it? Sure. I'll take this one. It is fairly steady. I mean, there's some seasonality when you think about butane blending with our refining kit and how that interacts with our NGL business. That has some seasonality. A lot of it is fairly steady when you think about a lot of this is throughput-driven. A lot of this is the operational synergies that we have across the portfolio. Those tend to get realized on a month-in and month-out basis. A lot of stability in that regard. I would echo what you heard certainly from Mark and Rich is that we still see a lot of opportunity to continually improve and even extract more value in the integrated model. Excited for the opportunities that we see the portfolio presenting us. Great. Thanks, Don. That's all for me. Thank you. Our next question comes from Ryan Todd with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Good. Thanks. Maybe first off, one back on refining. Distillate markets have been very tight with really supportive margins. Can you talk about what you see as the primary drivers in your view? How do you see the outlook over the remainder of the year? As you think about your operations, is there anything more that you can do to increase distillate yields, or are you maxed out given the current crude slate? Hey, Ryan. It's Brian. I'd say, although distillate's been favored over gasoline every month this year, May distillate remains very strong, as you pointed out, with the lowest U.S. inventories in decades and recent lower clean product yields versus Q2 of 2024. We would expect distillate margins to remain strong through the end of the year with planning season coming up, our hurricane season coming up, fall turnarounds, and then winter demand right after that. We would expect tight distillate margins to put also bullish pressure on gasoline margins as refineries move to making more and more distillate through the driving season. I'd say thinking about what would put some pressure on the distillate margins, it'll come from additional OPEC crude and the weakening of fuel oil values with heavy crude pressure. Additionally, we have Canadian producers ramping up production, putting more heavy crude on the market. We've seen back and forth, some jet moving into the diesel pool. I'd say that one of the things we're doing is watching the Mid East and India where the global net distillate length exists for potential imports into Europe. While we don't think China is going to add any more gasoline or diesel exports, this could also take some steam from distillate. Finally, as many people have talked about, we've seen lower biodiesel and our renewable diesel production. It's also bullish for distillate. We would think that distillate margins will remain strong through the year, eventually coming off some when you get these extra barrels, heavy crude barrels back onto the market. All right. Thank you. I know a big focus here, improvement in refining performance has also been an improvement on the commercial side of the business. Can you talk about how you view your progress in that regard, and particularly in a quarter like this one, what benefits you might be seeing in terms of your efforts on the commercial side? Yeah. We continue to drive our commercial business. We have done a lot of hiring. We have done a lot of upgrading in the business. We are focused on driving more value through the integrated system and moving barrels further along the value chain. As you know, we have offices in Houston, Canada, Calgary, the U.K., Singapore, and a small office in China as well. We are constantly looking to drive value by moving barrels to the highest net back markets. As an example, LPGs or naphthas may end up in Asia, and we have the customers in Asia. We have the employees in Asia to talk to those customers and figure out what they need. I think we have made a lot of progress. We have added a strong origination group. We have hired about two dozen originators around the world. These are people that speak multiple languages, understand multiple commodities, and can drive value with customers, thinking about what we might want to buy and sell with customers and how we might use our integrated system to drive more value. I am really excited about the progress we have made in commercial. I think, as Don and Mark have pointed out, there is still more opportunity. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Phillip Jungwirth with BMO. Please go ahead. Thanks. You guys have been pretty active in managing the midstream portfolio and are now shifting the focus more to organic growth. I am wondering if there's more to do on the divestiture side here. Where there's crude or refined product pipelines that maybe you do not necessarily operate. Are there arguably still integration synergies, or is maintaining ownership more about just enhancing the cost structure for refining, diversification, or just not the right environment to really realize full value? I'm sorry, Philip, we've got an active list that we look at. We've taken a deep dive and defined what our core assets are, what we believe our non-core assets are, and we're working that list. There are more potential sales of non-core assets, primarily in midstream non-operated kinds of assets. We're not ready to put a number out there or talk about specific assets, but we do have a considerable list of things that we could continue to monetize. Okay. Great. I do not think we have asked about the new M&S allocation slide that you have in the deck here just to be more apples to apples in terms of comparing refining performance. It was a nice quarter for refining. I mean, typically, PSX tends to really outperform in the central corridor. I assume with the M&S allocation, the outperformance is even greater there. Just in a quarter where WCS did not really give you much help, what do you guys look at as far as really attributing and driving that relative outperformance? In some of the other regions, maybe like the Gulf Coast, I know you mentioned the Sweeney Project. Are there other things you can do there, new projects or otherwise, to improve relative margin uplifts given that you are pretty vertically integrated in the Gulf Coast also? Hey, Phillip, it's Brian. Maybe I'll start on talking about the mid-con strength. Again, we talked about the commercial organization. I think they had a hand in the mid-con as well. We were able to increase value in mid-con by optimizing the system, essentially, on both gasoline and diesel. We anticipated strong mid-con prices in Q2 with heavy turnarounds and decreasing inventories, and we positioned our system appropriately. Also on the gasoline, prior to the emergency RVP waivers, our refineries were able to produce the lower RVP, which received a premium in the market given the limited production. Finally, I think, just in general, our refineries had minimal maintenance during a heavy mid-con turnaround season, so we benefited by running while others were down. Yeah. I guess I'll add on the refining side of the business. What we see an opportunity on in the Gulf Coast and even a bit in the Mid-Continent area is to continue to fill up the secondary units in our processes. That may not be native feedstocks, may not be generated from the front end of the facility. That is an opportunity that we've zeroed in on, and we think there's good potential there that we can increase the overall utilization of the assets and generate more clean products for the marketplace. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Joe Laetsch with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hey, team. Thanks for taking my questions. I wanted to start on the full-year turnaround expense guidance, which was reduced by $100 million. Was this due to outperformance, or was prior planned maintenance deferred? What I'm getting at and trying to figure out is if the $400 million-$500 million level is a fair run rate to use going forward. Thanks. Yeah. I'll take this one, Joe. This is Rich. The third-quarter guidance we gave you was $50 million-$60 million. If you look at the year-to-date spend, we've underspent based on our previous guidance there. We did feel it was important to adjust the overall guidance for the year, and that's attributed to really two primary things that we've got going on. One has been our continued focus on execution and planning, and that work has really allowed us to be very efficient on the execution and actually come under our historical productivity or above our productivity numbers, but under our historical spend to execute our work. The second key component of this is the maturity of our inspection programs, where we're moving from a time-based inspection process to a condition-based inspection process. That does two things. One, it allows us to really optimize the interval between turnarounds. As more data comes available, we have a technical basis to move a turnaround from, call it, 36 months to 48 months or whatever that interval is. The other benefit that this inspection process is driving is actually reduced scope of work inside the turnarounds, which is reducing the complexity of the turnarounds and then compounding the effectiveness on the execution and planning side of the business. Year-to-date, we performed quite well. We've spent around $320 million year-to-date. Looking at the numbers, we felt it was the right thing to do to adjust our full-year outlook down by $100 million. Thanks for that detail. Good to see the execution. My second question is on the midstream side. Now that Coastal Bend has been closed for a couple of months, can you talk to how the integration is going, synergy capture, and any surprises now that you've had some time with it in the portfolio? Thank you. Sure. This is Don. I'd say our Coastal Bend integration work is going quite well. As you heard on the call today, the first phase of our expansion is near complete. We are on schedule for completing the second expansion, which would take us up to 350,000 a day of volume capacity in 2026. We're well on our way capturing the cost synergies as well as the commercial opportunities that we saw that would be associated with bringing Coastal Bend into our broader wellhead-to-market system. That's all going quite well. I think you step back, it's a great addition that really supports our organic growth plans that you see us executing in the Permian with our gas gathering and processing plant expansions like Dos Picos II and the Iron Mesa gas plants. All of that is volume that's going to come out of those plants and feed into Coastal Bend and then hit that Gulf Coast market where Coastal Bend plus what we had really creates a great network of purity product lines that hits a lot of markets up and down the Gulf Coast and really see robust opportunity there. The customer feedback, customer engagement that we've had post-closing Coastal Bend has been robust and very positive. Really excited about what the acquisition has done for us and what the opportunity set looks like. Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you. Our next question comes from Paul Cheng with Scotiabank. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Good afternoon. I think it's still good morning for you guys. Brian, can I go back to the renewable diesel? You're saying that you are running at reduced rates. Just curious that if the margin is lower, does that mean that you're going to reduce further from the second-quarter level? In other words, how sensitive you are in your one-way versus the market condition? Also, whether you have fully booked the PTC in the second quarter or that there's some incremental benefit that we should assume and expect on that. That's the first question. The second question, I think, is for Mark. Upon the completion of the shutdown of L.A., you have no refinery in California, but you have wholesale and retail marketing operations there. Also, in Europe, given the market condition, it's never really that great for the oil and gas business. In those two sets of business, it means that in Europe, your refining and marketing business, and in California, your marketing business, in the long haul, how do you see them fitting into your portfolio? They should be part of your portfolio long haul. Thank you. Hey, Paul. It's Brian. I'll start. I'll tell you that we're likely to run Rodeo at reduced rates, even from Q2 in Q3. That'll be predicated on the market, and the market may be better or may not. As you know, there's a lot of aspects to the margins for renewable diesel and renewable jet, including all the credits, including the price of the renewable diesel relative to the CARB diesel, and also the price of the feedstock, and they all move in tandem. We're watching it all very closely. Depending on what the market gives us, that's what we'll run the plant at. Yeah. Paul, on your second question regarding L.A. shutdown, you're right. We'll have no traditional refining capacity in California. I would point you to what we did when we converted Rodeo to renewable feedstocks. In essence, we were neutral on diesel production. It just happened to be renewable diesel versus traditional diesel, but we had to backfill gasoline. We did that, and other market participants did that by importing. We also have the ability to import from our Ferndale Refinery in Washington, so it's a good position there. As we shut down L.A., again, it's primarily a gasoline import opportunity. The California authorities have been very proactive in helping us address the import opportunities from the water, whether it's international or other domestic sources. We've got a great plan that's been well received by California. I'd also add to Mark's comments. I think what's interesting is we believe that the volatility in California gasoline prices will actually be reduced with more gasoline imports. If you think about having mature supply chains, which are similar to other markets like PADD 1, which is also a gasoline import market, you're going to have barrels coming in large ships, 300,000 barrels to 700,000 barrels, and those barrels will come off the ship and be stored and ready for our market dislocations. You also have many more destinations that can produce now CARB gasoline than in the past. Also, as Mark pointed out, destinations that are very close to California, like our Ferndale Refinery. In fact, gasoline imports into California versus a five-year average are up 70,000 barrels a day already. We really don't see any constraints on getting the CARB gasoline. We see a lot more gasoline coming into the market. The steady stream will help put a lid on volatility to a certain degree. The only issue is infrastructure. That's a potential issue. What we've seen is the state is aware of this and seems poised to continue to help us on that infrastructure. We think California is in a very good position. Yeah. Regarding Europe, we've already exited co-op. We are exiting 65% of our jet position in Germany and Austria. Clearly, that's not strategic for us. We like the deal that we did for jet. It was a solid offer from a high-quality buyer. They wanted us to come along for some period of time as they adjust to that market. We still have exposure to the upside there with clear exit provisions. We're comfortable with where we are there in Europe. Around Humber and the integrated position in the U.K., Humber is really the leading refinery in the U.K., perhaps in all of Europe. It's a strong position there. It has good optionality. As you see others rationalize assets, it's only going to strengthen its position. Thank you. Our next question comes from Matthew Blair with Tudor Pickering Holt. Please go ahead, Matthew. Thank you. Good morning. I want to check in on the refining guide for Q3. I think it was for utilization in the low to mid-90% range versus the 98% in Q2. Your turnaround expense is flat quarter-over-quarter. The indicator in July, at least, should be higher than the Q2 average. I guess we're a little surprised that utilization might be coming down fairly significantly in Q3. Is there anything to read into that, or what's going on there? I'll take that one. There's a couple of things going on that you need to think about on this one, Matt. One is, and this is public information, Bayway, our Bayway facility, had an upset here, a power outage during the last set of storms that rolled through. That took the entire plant down. The plant's back up now and operating well, but that will have an impact on utilization. The second thing is around our Los Angeles refinery. We've indicated that we're going to cease operations in the fourth quarter. Actually, on the backside of the third quarter, you'll start seeing some winding down of the operation that will have also some impact to utilization. Thank you. That's helpful. Then on the renewables business, I'm wondering if it would make sense to seek out a partner here. There's a lot of other examples in the space where your competitors are working with partners to provide help on feedstocks. We saw a deal earlier this week where a partner came in and valued SAF capacity at about $4.50 a gallon, which seems like a pretty attractive number. Is that on the table for PSX bringing in a partner on the renewable diesel side? With assets like this, we always look at what the best options are to create value. I agree with you. That was a very attractive number. As I said earlier, everything's on the table. Great. Thank you. Thanks, Matt. Thank you. This concludes the question and answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Mark Lashier for closing comments. Thanks for all your questions. Before we wrap up, I want to emphasize three points from the call. The strong financial and operating results this quarter show that we're executing well on a proven strategy. Our integrated business model generates competitive returns through disciplined investments and synergy capture along our crude and NGL value chains. We're committed to returning over 50% of net operating cash flow to shareholders through share repurchases and a secure, competitive, and growing dividend. Thank you for your interest in Phillips 66. If you have questions or feedback after today's call, please contact Jeff or Owen. Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. This concludes our call, and you may now disconnect your line.