Good day, and welcome to Renasant Corporation's 2026 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. All participants will be in a listen-only mode for the duration of the call. Should you need any assistance today, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. If you'd like to withdraw a question, please press star, then two. Also, please be aware that today's call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Kelly Hutcheson, Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thank you for joining us for Renasant Corporation's quarterly webcast and conference call. Participating in the call today are members of Renasant's executive management team. Before we begin, please note that many of our comments during this call will be forward-looking statements which involve risk and uncertainty. There are many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the mix and cost of our funding sources, interest rate fluctuation, regulatory changes, portfolio performance, and other factors discussed in our recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our recently filed earnings release, which has been posted to our corporate site, www.renasant.com, at the Press Releases link under the News and Market Data tab. We undertake no obligation. We specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events, or changes to future operating results over time. In addition, some of the financial measures that we may discuss this morning are non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release. Now I will turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Kevin Chapman. Thank you, Kelly. Good morning. Our performance in the second quarter continued at the pace we set in the first quarter. Operating results across the company were strong as we continued to focus on organic growth, as well as disruption in many of our markets. Adjusted earnings per share in the second quarter were $0.94, up 36% from a year ago. Adjusted return on average assets was 1.3% compared to 1.01% in the same period last year. Similarly, adjusted return on average tangible common equity was 16.25% versus 13.5% in the second quarter of 2025. The efficiency ratio also improved from 67.6% a year ago to 57.9% this quarter. By focusing on increasing core banking relationships and adding talent throughout the company, Renasant is in a great position to capitalize on growth opportunities throughout the back half of the year. I will now turn the call over to Jim to provide more details on our financial results. Thank you, Kevin, and good morning. Looking at the balance sheet, loans are up $220.9 million on a linked quarter basis or 4.7% annualized. Deposits were down $398.4 million from the first quarter or 7.2% annualized, primarily due to seasonal outflows of public fund deposits. Reported net interest margin decreased 4 basis points to 3.83%, while adjusted margin remained flat at 3.61%. Our adjusted total cost of deposits increased by 2 basis points to 1.96%, while our adjusted loan yields decreased 1 basis point to 6.03%. From a capital standpoint, all regulatory capital ratios remain in excess of required minimums to be considered well capitalized. We recorded a credit loss provision on loans of $3.8 million, comprised of $1.2 million for funded loans and $2.6 million for unfunded commitments. The ACL as a percentage of total loans declined 2 basis points quarter-over-quarter to 1.54%. Turning to the income statement, our pre-provision net revenue was $112.4 million. Net interest income was $227.7 million, a decrease of $0.8 million quarter-over-quarter. Non-interest income was $51.2 million in the second quarter, a linked quarter increase of $0.9 million. Non-interest expense was $161.5 million for the second quarter, a linked quarter increase of $6.2 million, mostly driven by deferred compensation accruals tied to market valuations, higher health insurance claims, and annual merit increases. We look forward to the second half of 2026. I will now turn the call back over to Kevin. Thank you, Jim. We believe that Renasant is in a great position to continue to improve on its high levels of performance. We appreciate your interest in Renasant and look forward to discussing our results with you. I will now turn the call over to the operator for questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. Again, to ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw a question, you may press star then two. At this time, we will pause just momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question here will come from Michael Rose with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Wanted to start on loan growth. Obviously, really good production this quarter. Can you just talk about the expectations as we think about the back half of the year? It looks like if I either include or exclude Republic, you guys were a little short of my expectations and consensus, just want to get a sense for production levels from here, schedule payoffs, and what you would expect out of Republic business as we move forward. Thanks. Yeah. Hey, Michael, good morning. It's Kevin. You broke down several of the components of the growth. We were pleased with the uptick in production that we had in Q3. As you noted, that was offset by some headwinds and payoffs. Still think payoffs are going to continue to be something we have to overcome. As we look at our pipeline, as we look at our efforts, we look at our conversations with customers, production is ramping. It's ramping in the fact that our pipeline, if we look at our pipeline today it's up about 6%-10% from where it was at the beginning of Q2. What we're seeing where we've guided to that mid-single digit growth number, we're seeing that fully in scope and fully in range as we get into Q3 and into the back half of the year. Very helpful, Kevin. Maybe one for Jim on expenses. Expenses were maybe a little bit higher than I think what I was looking for. Any change to the trajectory that you guys had previously talked about? Maybe if you can just balance some of the investments that you guys are making in both people and technology, along with other cost-saving opportunities that you guys may have. Thanks. Sure. Good morning, Michael. Yes, we had a couple of one-time or non-recurring items in the expense bucket. When we look at our core expense run rate, we feel really good with where it is. These are obviously the results of the results. The underlying trends and expenses we feel is good. I would say our outlook from here is that what we saw in Q1 in terms of expenses probably will moderate downward a little bit in Q3 and be steady for the balance of the year. That does reflect as you talked about investments we're making in people, and we continue to make those investments in people, and the guidance that I'm sharing in terms of that trajectory allows for some of that. If we're more successful than we think in terms of some of those hires, that might change a little bit. I think the core NIE rate will again come down a little bit and then remain steady for the balance of the year. Very helpful. I'll step back. Thanks for taking my questions, guys. Hey, Michael, before you hop off, I may just add to that. Jim talked about the new hires. We've talked about our activity in new hires that we've had going back to Q3 of last year. Just to remind you, in Q1, we had 18 new revenue-producing new hires. In Q2, that number was 5. We added five. So far in Q3, we've added seven. We've talked about the opportunities that we've had in the markets to hire talent. We continue to execute on that. Will continue to look for opportunities to add and augment to our team. Those hires as well as the activity that we're having in our markets from our existing team is showing up in results. Michael, you talked about the loan growth. We talked about the headwinds from the payoffs. The production, the activity is offsetting the headwinds. I'll just give you a data point of what we're seeing so far in Q3. We've seen elevated payoffs in Q3, but production is outpacing that. Right now we're up net loans about $40 million, and that's on elevated payoffs. Our teams are continuing to focus on taking market share, serving customers, and that continues to show up in the numbers even as we get into Q3. Appreciate all that color, Kevin. Thanks again. I'll step back. Our next question will come from Catherine Mealor with KBW. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning. Morning, Catherine. Moving to the other side of the balance sheet, I know some of the outflows in deposits were seasonal this quarter with public funds. Can you give us any update on what you're seeing on your core underlying deposit trends and expectations for deposit growth in the second half of the year? Catherine, this is Jim. Maybe I'll start. Go ahead, Kevin. No, Jim, you go ahead. A couple things, and I know Kevin can add some really good color, Catherine, as it relates to some recent trends. But yes, as you noted, seasonal outflows and public funds were really the driver in terms of the change from Q1 to Q2. As you probably recall from prior quarters with us, we'll start to see those flows reverse here in the second half. As opposed to being a headwind, those inflows will be a tailwind. Then, I guess, most importantly, and really probably to the main point of your question, the underlying performance in core deposits we're very encouraged about. Not only do we expect to see the public fund trend shift, but I think the underlying trends in core deposits are really strong. Kevin, you may want to pick up on that. Catherine, I think if you go back to this call in Q2, back in April, we shared some of the numbers we'd seen at that time about new account openings. We're interested and excited to see how that would play out through the remainder of the quarter. Just to kind of refresh you on what we achieved as far as core deposit growth, kind of looking through that public fund noise. Just core deposit growth and new account openings that we had in Q2. New account openings, new customers to the bank, did not have an existing account with us, did not have existing dollars with us. We opened up over 10,000 new accounts in Q2, and that equates to roughly $380 million in new deposits. If you break that down, about half of it was CDs, which means the other half was checking accounts. We believe those checking accounts are sticky core deposits that we didn't go and get because of rate. We got to do the relationship. That's also commercial accounts as well as consumer accounts. As we look at that activity into Q3, that activity hasn't slowed down. Just through July, we've opened up over 2,000 net new accounts, and that represents $86 million in new fundings. Some of these accounts we don't think all the money has moved into yet. We think those accounts are still being funded. Activity and reassigning deposits or bill pay, all of that activity is still going on, and we expect to continue to see deposits build into some of these accounts as we get into Q3 and Q4. Great. How about the rate on new deposit growth? I'd assume because we saw a couple basis points increase in deposit costs this quarter, especially maybe the CD piece is coming on with a little bit of a higher rate. Curious maybe where that ended the quarter? Maybe the public funds might kind of mess that up if we're looking at an exit run rate. Curious what you're thinking about deposit cost increases in the next couple quarters. Yeah. Our deposits- Go ahead, Kevin. Yeah. Our deposits are coming in at market rates. We don't have a special out there. We're not paying above average to get them. I think the weighted average rate of those new accounts are going to be in the high 2s and low 3s. That's great. Great. Thank you. Our next question will come from Matt Olney with Stephens. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning. Appreciate you taking my question. Want to go back to the loan growth discussion, and the loan production sounds great. Any more color on loan pricing competition? I think when we talked in April, you highlighted just increasing pressure back then. Curious any update, since that April timeframe. Thanks. Jim, you want to talk about new and renewed? Sure. As you recall, and you were talking about April, I mean, the pressures that were present then are still there. It is very competitive on both sides. On the loan side, I think in terms of new and renewed, we're generally looking in the low 6s, Matt. There's certainly a lot of competitive pressures there, and it varies by region. We're seeing it in certain markets and maybe not so much in others. The same thing on the deposit side. You saw our cost inched up a bit on deposits, and we do have some tailwinds that will help us in terms of them. Yes, those pressures remain as they were back in April. Okay. Appreciate that, Jim. Then I guess as a follow-up, just thinking more about interest rate sensitivity. If the Fed funds were to move up this week or in September, would love to know kind of what your thoughts are as far as the balance sheet and overall impact to higher Fed funds. Thanks. I would say that, as it relates to the profitability side of that and margin, in our outlook, we're not budgeting or planning on any cut or increase as we sit here today. Generally, I would say that 25 basis points here, that's not going to make a big difference in our outlook in terms of the profitability impact. I would say that's generally be true on the balance sheet in terms of dollars. Absent a more meaningful change in rates, I don't see it having a major impact on the balance sheet or the income statement. Okay. Thanks, guys. Thank you, Matt. Our next question will come from Dave Bishop with Hovde Group. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, gentlemen. Good morning, Dave. Since Matt sort of opened the door in terms of the NIM discussion, just curious, is the bias for stability still here? Or maybe, I think you mentioned maybe some tailwinds on the deposit side. Do you see a little bit of bias? I'm just curious how you're thinking about the margin. Sure. As we sort of discussed in answer to Matt's question, our outlook is that generally it's going to be fairly stable for the second half. We've got certainly the deposit pricing pressures, but I'd say on the asset side, we've got a couple things working for us. As you probably noted, I mean, most of our loan growth in the quarter came at the very end of the quarter. There's a significant difference between average balances and period-end balances for us, and that'll be a nice tailwind going to Q3. The other thing is we've got roughly a $1.25 billion i n loans that mature over the next 12 months, and the rate on that's about 4.95%. That'll be another tailwind that will benefit and help offset deposit pricing pressures. Lastly, not as significant, but still meaningful, we've got $50 million- $60 million a month rolling off the securities book, and that's coming off at the low 3s, Dave, and coming back on the upper 4s or close to 5%. We feel good about the outlook of a stable margin, a core stable margin here in the back half. Great. Appreciate that color. Maybe Kevin or Jim, you talked about the pay downs and the payoff headwinds continuing. Just curious if you could sort of ring fence maybe what vintages those are coming from and from a snake-through-the-tunnel perspective, do you think you're in the seventh, eighth, ninth inning, or still sort of midway through? Just curious how you sort of view the pay down pipeline. Kevin? Yeah. Dave, just what we're seeing in scheduled pay downs or what's been communicated to us, it's largely coming in some commercial real estate, some asset classes. There's been above average payoff in some multi-family and some office space. It's also largely coming from the sell of the assets, or in some cases, the sell of the business. As we get into Q3, we've seen some early payoffs in our C&I book, and it's really sell of the underlying business. It's not as if we're losing any of these loans to competition. Our borrowers are making decisions to sell collateral, to liquidate collateral. As they look at redeploying that liquidity, we expect to get first shot at any future opportunity. Largely the payoffs are coming in commercial real estate. We somewhat anticipated this as rates kind of bottomed out in Q1 that we thought we'd see some elevated payoffs. As the 10-year has increased, we think some of those pressures on the payoffs of commercial real estate subside a little bit in the short run, or long run, depending on where the 10-year goes. We are expecting some easing on the payoffs. Again, it can be very lumpy at the same time as our customers make decisions about the underlying collateral. Throughout the book, outside of it being commercial real estate, we're not seeing it being concentrated in a certain market or it's not runoff from the first book. It's really just broad-based, and we're seeing it more mainly in the asset class of commercial real estate. Got it. One final question. Kevin, you noted the strong deposit account openings. Just curious if any of that you can sort of point to coming from some of the merger disruption that's been undergone within your footprint. Thanks. It's a handful of things, market disruption is one of those main underliers. I mean, Dave, we've had a focus on deposits going back to 2023 that we wanted to continue to maintain a moderate loan to deposit ratio in that mid-80% range. We've had a heightened focus on deposits, market disruption just allowed us to lean into that focus. I mean, look, our teams, just look at the numbers. Our teams responded to the opportunity in the market, we don't think that opportunity is abating at the moment. We still think there's a lot of disruption and a lot of opportunity. Again, we may have mentioned this in the past, but we think the fact that we're stable, we're not doing a major merger, we're not going through a transformational integration, we're not reorging the company. All of those play well to where we can just be stable and focus on client needs. Our teams know who their credit partner is. They know who to go to. They know they've got good support in the back office, and that they will show well in front of a customer that has uncertainty or may be unhappy where they currently are. Perfect. Appreciate the color. Thank you, Dave. Our next question will come from Janet Lee with TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Morning. Not to be too nitpicky on the public fund seasonal outflows. When we look at in the third quarter, should we expect any of those to come back to the bank in the third quarter or the fourth quarter? I get that you're getting a good traction on the core deposit growth side, but just wanted to see how your forecast pans out in the second half of 2026. Janet, this is Jim. Good morning. I think our sense is that if you look at deposit growth in the second half, on both sides, we sort of target, whether it's loans or deposits, that mid single digit growth rate number through the cycle, through the periods. That outlook really hasn't changed. Our expectation is that you're going to see good deposit growth in the second half and public funds will be relatively stable, if not some inflows there. Those public fund deposits, can you give us what the cost there is relative to your average cost of deposits at 1.96%? It would be somewhat higher, probably roughly 100 basis points higher, Janet. Oh, okay. Can you share with us the spot cost of deposits at the end of June? The- For total. Yeah, total cost of deposit at the end of June was 1.96%. Oh, so the same as the average for the quarter? That's correct. Lastly, could you give us a refresh on the Basel III proposal impact to your CET1? Has CET1 range or target beyond 2026? Our expectation is it'll reduce risk-weighted assets somewhere around $1 billion-$1.3 billion, and that's, call it, 55-65 basis points positive impact to CET1. I think one, we have it at this point budgeted that in or projected that in, even though that seems like that's where things are going. As to how we think about our capital position going forward with that, it doesn't change how we look at underlying capital goals. As you know, we like CET1 to be in the low 11s, and I don't think that will change. I don't think our outlook on that will change because of this change in the regs. What implications that's got for capital deployment? We'll see, but I don't think it's going to change the way we think about our capital base and where we want it to be relative to the balance sheet. Got it. That's it. Thank you. Again, if you have a question or a follow-up, you may press star then one to join the queue. Our next question here will come from Stephen Scouten with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning. Maybe one follow-up first on just the expense trajectory. I think, Jim, you said it could potentially go down a little bit into the third quarter. Is that some of the slight jump there in other non-interest earning expense driving some of that? What was embedded within that increased quarter-over-quarter there in that line item? Good morning, Stephen. There are a couple of things. Some merit, which certainly we contemplated was part of that increase. There was an increase associated with deferred comp expense, we don't expect that to be part of the second half, that'll be a benefit. Then health and life. We're self-insured, sometimes those claims will be higher than normal, and they were a little higher in Q2 than we anticipated. That's why our outlook for the second half is for moderately lower expenses. Still baking in, as Kevin's talked about, opportunistic hiring. Okay, great. Yeah, on that opportunistic hiring front, I think last quarter, Kevin, you had said, look, there's some markets maybe where we don't feel like we could even have enough people. Any updates on geographically where you would look to add people? Given all the dislocation in your markets and even around your markets, would you look at moving towards Texas at all for LPOs or otherwise to take advantage of that disruption there? Yeah, Stephen. Our primary focus is mainly building out in our existing footprint. As it relates to a new market, that's all going to be facts and circumstances. There are a couple of markets where we have a presence. We may have a single location, and it's a large market, and we need to build the infrastructure or continue our path or accelerate our path towards more relevance in some of those markets. I think that's going to be our focus primarily before we go open up a new market. Maybe specifically in the case like Texas. There's a lot that we would need to learn about Texas. Great market, great state. Economically, is outperforming any metric that you can throw at it. Also, I think, looking at what it would take to be relevant in some of the markets in Texas, we would have to have significant scale to be relevant in a place like a Dallas or a Houston or San Antonio. I think that as it relates to Texas being a primary focus, I would say that's not the case at the moment. We're going to focus more on our existing market and building out more scale, more infrastructure in our existing market. I'll also say, not apologizing for our markets as well. The Southeast and the markets that we operate in, those are very high-performing, high inbound migration, high median household income, high economic growth potential. We feel like we've got ample opportunity in our existing footprint before we go launch and try to go to another market. Again, I think in some of those cases, we'd have to go there in a substantial way to be able to be relevant in some of those markets. Yeah, that makes sense. Appreciate that color. Maybe just lastly from me, curious if you could touch on just kind of lending competition from the standpoint of what you're seeing in terms of aggressiveness from competitors around either rate, structure, or both kind of if there's a bigger tension point on one or the other, and if any of what you're seeing competitors do gives you maybe trepidation about the ability to hit the growth targets if things just get further down the risk curve than you'd want to be. Kevin, you or David? Good morning, Stephen. This is David. Hey, Stephen, this is David. We're seeing those pressures come across a variety of elements. We've talked about, Jim talked about this morning, the pricing pressures, and those continue quarter-over-quarter. We're seeing other elements of pressure within our structure from competition. It could be anything from level of guarantor support on a transaction, proceeds that we loan, covenants. It comes in various forms from a competitive sector, which is normal as we progress through a competitive environment. It's going to go rate, then it's going to go terms. We're starting to see that on terms. To your point about is that going to impact loan growth, we're going to continue to be disciplined, just like we always have on our opportunities. It's with its customers that we know, markets that we know well. We have good institutional knowledge, both on the front line with the lender as well as the credit side, the management side. We're going to lean into opportunities with well-known customers to protect those relationships, particularly where we've got deposits at risk and so forth. We're going to protect those relationships. If it's a new customer, something that we may not be as comfortable with, we may pull back and say, we're going to continue to remain disciplined in our terms. It all comes back to that disciplined underwriting that's going to continue to drive our positive credit metrics. It's a balance. We're seeing the competition, we're just going to choose when we lean in and when we don't lean in. Got it. Very helpful. Thank you so much for all the color today. Yes. Hey, Stephen, Kevin, I'll just add, I'll ask one last thing. To your point about the competition, do we think it causes us to relook at our guidance? Short answer is no. In fact, our guidance is based off the competition. We firmly believe that we are and should be a mid-single digit grower. That factors in what it takes to be competitive in our markets. There is competition all around us for good loan growth, and we can be competitive in that. At some point, though, when it comes to rate, there has to be a question, are we getting the proper returns off of the use of that capital? It may look good on the balance sheet that we're showing growth, but long term, it may take us off track from our profitability goals. As we look at the mid-single digit, we think that allows us to get the proper returns at the proper rate with the proper underwriting. It doesn't put pressure on our funding costs, allows us to keep margins stable. All of that is baked into the math and the calculus behind being a single-digit grower long term. If we press on that, it can cause we may have to change our outlook, maybe not on balance sheet growth, but on margin compression or on profitability, which at this time we don't feel any need to do that. We think we can grow single digit and hit all of our goals as it relates to increasing and improving profitability, maintaining a stable margin, not outgrowing our funding. All of that is why we come with the basis of the mid-single digit growth. Great. Thanks for that, Kevin. Appreciate it. Our next question is a follow-up from Matt Olney with Stephens. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks, guys. Just a few follow-ups here. On the fee side, I haven't heard you guys talk much about the fees this morning. Looked a little bit softer than expectations. I think we typically have a kind of a nice seasonal pull through in 2Q. Anything to call out there in 2Q or the outlook in the near term? Matt, this is Jim. I think a couple of things. If you break down the fee income, we had really good SBA numbers in the first half. I do think they were really strong numbers. They'll probably moderate some in the second half, so that'll be a headwind. Capital markets has been soft in the first half, and I think we talked about it in our Q1 call. They were on clip for a record quarter in Q1, and then things sort of dropped off the cliff with the hostilities in the Middle East. We feel really good about capital markets in the second half and are hopeful that'll sort of rebound to historic levels. Mortgage continues to be weak. We don't see anything improving there, and it could be a little bit weaker than what we saw in Q2. Wealth is very steady and growing. It's an area too that I would cite as a beneficiary of some of the dislocation that we're experiencing in our market. All in all, I would say that Q2 run rate is probably pretty close to what we'll do in the second half, plus or minus a little bit, that's probably a good jumping-off point for what we see in the second half. Okay. All right. Appreciate that, Jim. Then, I guess going back to the expense discussion, I hear your point around the 2Q levels being a little bit elevated due to some of those items that you called out were unusual or a little heavy than what we typically see. I just want to make sure I understand the expectations for the third quarter. I think I heard you say it was going to be lower than what we saw in 2Q. Is there any more you can give us beyond that? Is there a range? Asking just because it's a pretty big range from we saw in the first quarter versus what we saw in the second quarter. Thanks. Sure. It is. I would say this, Matt, I don't know. I do feel good about the, I think it was $160 million-$165 million coming down in Q3. I think the reason I would hedge a little bit on how far it comes down somewhat depends upon the success we have in this opportunistic hiring. We've got some of that baked in, then a couple of the items in Q2. Health and life is just a really difficult thing to project, but that was over $1 million in Q2, $1 million more than what it was in Q1. It's a little tough to project, but we're hopeful and optimistic that it will come down and then stabilize. What we see in Q3 will be a good indicator of what we should see for Q4. I know it's not probably giving you the specificity you want, but I think we were angling towards roughly a $160 million number internally for Q2 when we ended Q1, and I think absent some of these items we'd called out, we'd have been right on the mark there. Okay. Understood. Well, several moving parts there, definitely get the view there. Thank you, guys. Thank you, Matt. This concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Kevin Chapman for any closing remarks. Thank you, Joe, and thank you to all of those that have joined us this morning. We appreciate your interest in Renasant and look forward to meeting with you throughout the quarter. Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect your lines.