Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. My name is Abby, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Root, Inc. second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. Today's conference is being recorded, and all lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press the Star key followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, just press Star one once again. Thank you, and I will now turn the conference over to Christine Patrick. You may begin. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. Root is hosting this call to discuss its second quarter 2022 earnings results. Participating on today's call are Alex Timm, Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, and Rob Bateman, Chief Financial Officer. During the question-and-answer portion of the call, our presenters will be joined by Dan Rosenthal, Chief Revenue and Operating Officer, Matt Bonakdarpour, Chief Technology Officer, and Frank Palmer, Chief Insurance Officer. Last evening, Root issued a shareholder letter announcing its financial results. While this call will reflect items discussed within that document, for more complete information about our financial performance, we also encourage you to read our second quarter 2022 Form 10-Q, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission last evening. Before we begin, I want to remind you that matters discussed on today's call will include forward-looking statements related to our operating performance, financial goals, and business outlook, which are based on management's current beliefs and assumptions. Please note that these forward-looking statements reflect our opinions as of the date of this call, and we undertake no obligation to revise this information as a result of new developments that may occur. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected and described today. In addition, we are subject to a number of risks that may significantly impact our business and financial results. For a more detailed description of our risk factors, please review our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31st, 2021, where you will see a discussion of factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from these statements, as well as our shareholder letter and second quarter 2022 Form 10-Q released last evening. A replay of this conference call will be available on our website under the Investor Relations section. I would also like to remind you that during the call, we will discuss some non-GAAP measures in talking about Root's performance. You can find the reconciliation of those historical measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measures in our shareholder letter released last evening and our Form 10-Q filing with the SEC, which are posted on our website at ir.joinroot.com. I would now like to turn the call over to Alex Timm, Root's Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer. Thank you, Christine. We continue to execute on our playbook of raising rates, tightening underwriting, and managing cash as we respond to prolonged difficulties with the supply chain and inflation. Despite this challenging environment, the proactive steps we are taking have resulted in further improvements to our financials. Through our tech stack and rating engine, year to date, we have been able to implement 35 rate filings with an average increase of 28% while filing revised insurance contracts in 23 states to tighten underwriting rules and reduce premium leakage. On a year-over-year basis, we have significantly reduced cash burn and improved our gross accident period loss ratio five points, adjusted EBITDA 59% and loss and LAE expenses by 57%. We focused on deepening our competitive advantage through continued investment in technology. We have shipped our fully integrated product, Carvana Insurance Built with Root, which is showing improved attach rates in its early days. We believe that being able to offer an instant quote at the point of vehicle sale creates a product that works better for consumers and is something that our technology platform can uniquely provide. Though the current focus of our embedded channel is on our exclusive partnership with Carvana, our technology and embedded capabilities have driven discussions with additional prospective partners. We have also recently launched our digital agency. This allows Root to service customers that are not best suited for our particular insurance offering. It is a capital-light revenue stream that allows our partners to access our technology and distribution capabilities. While still early in development, we are excited to expand this offering in the future. We are constantly refining our models and the process around their development. This quarter, we made enhancements to the post-deployment review of our countrywide pricing model. This enhancement identifies segments that would benefit from pricing adjustments earlier, informing necessary model improvements to be made even more quickly. We are also working on the next generation of our UBI pricing model, which leverages our growing data set. We believe this will lead to more accurate pricing, the ability to simplify and speed future model development, and reduce test drive days required for a UBI-based rate. Looking ahead, we're going to continue to execute on pricing and underwriting improvements through the back half of 2022. Along with our continued focus on expanding and deepening our embedded product experience, we expect to continue to drive improvements in our financial results while further building differentiated access to customers. I'll now turn the call over to Rob to discuss our operating results in more detail. Thanks, Alex. Results for the second quarter of 2022 reflected our continued focus on strengthening underwriting performance and developing our industry-leading embedded offering. Our full GAAP financial results are disclosed in the shareholder letter we published yesterday evening, but I want to focus on a few key highlights. On the top line, gross written premium declined 21% year-over-year to $140 million. Our gross earned premium decreased 6% year-over-year to $171 million. The top line's decline reflects higher rates and stricter underwriting in underperforming geographies and customer segments, along with substantially reduced marketing spend. These actions have caused new business writings to decrease, with renewals making up 75% of gross earned premium this quarter as we focus on profitability. Gross accident period loss ratio was 85% for the second quarter, a five point improvement versus the second quarter of 2021. Our early response to higher severity and the ability to implement rate changes quickly, along with a higher weight of renewal premium, have driven consistent year-over-year improvement. We expect to continue to raise rates and take underwriting actions to improve bottom-line results. We remain focused on lowering expenses across the company to further reduce operating losses. During the second quarter, operational changes resulted in a 57% reduction in non-loss and LAE expenses compared with the second quarter of 2021. Operating loss was $81 million, a 53% improvement over prior year. Adjusted EBITDA, a KPI we introduced last quarter to give a clearer view of the underlying performance of our business, excluding certain non-cash items, improved 59%. We are conserving capital as we drive toward profitable unit economics. We ended the second quarter with $696 million of unencumbered capital, compared with roughly $736 million at the end of the first quarter. Our operating cash consumption has dropped over 54% when compared with the first half of 2021. Turning to our outlook, we continue to expect our results to reflect the actions we are taking as we navigate through this challenging environment. We expect gross written premium to reflect significant year-over-year declines in the second half of 2022 and meaningful improvement in our operating losses. We expect the magnitude of both measures to accelerate when compared with the first half of 2022, as we remain focused on improving operating results through strong underwriting and rate actions, as well as prudent capital management. We are making progress against the goals we set out a year ago, and we are not finished. Our focus is clear, strengthening our underwriting foundation and conserve capital while utilizing our technology advantage to build out our embedded product. We appreciate your continued support. With that, we look forward to your questions. At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, press star then 1 on your telephone keypad, and we will pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. We will take our first question from Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Great. Thanks. Good morning. My first question was, you know, following up on just the outlook, right? You said significant decline in the back half. I know you compare that to the first half of the year, but what about if you compared it to the Q2? Are you expecting premium and policy decline in the back half to be in line, I guess, with, you know, the pretty sharp declines we saw in the second quarter? Hi, Elyse. This is Rob. Yes, that would be right. We'd say if you look at the back half of the year, I'd say it's gonna look more like Q2 than Q1. We do expect that if you look at it year-over-year from the second half of this year compared to the second half of last year, that we'll be well. It will be above that 25% decline in both gross written premium and operating loss that we had talked about earlier. What's your view here? Like, how are you thinking about severity and frequency, you know, over the balance of the year? Do you think trends, especially in severity, are you expecting them to continue to remain elevated? Yeah. Well, Elyse, I'll give you the actual that we had. Our severity was 6%, and our frequency is 1%. I'll turn it over to Frank to give you a sense of what we're looking at for the back half of the year and our loss ratio picks. Sure. Good morning. I'd say that we are expecting that expenses and costs for frequency and severity will remain elevated, but I think the trends will be probably slower through the second half of this year compared to last year. While we don't expect to see used car prices, for example, going down, we don't expect to see the same amount of acceleration that we saw last year. Okay. One last one with marketing spend. That, you know, obviously has continued to come down. Would your expectations be that, I guess, that would remain more muted at least through the rest of this year and perhaps into 2023 as well? Thanks for the question, Elyse. Right now, we are entirely still focused on protecting the business. For us, what that means is staying really laser focused on profitability. Getting our loss ratio to the point where we feel that growth is prudent, and we expect to stay in that position at least through the back half of this year. We also, though, in terms of growth and spend, we also believe, and we continue to see growth in Carvana through our new product, where we're even further integrated with the purchase flow. We do expect to see continued growth in that channel. Thank you. Thanks. We will take our next question from Michael Phillips with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Thanks. Good morning. First question is on the gross accident period loss ratio this quarter, 85%, down five points from a year ago. I guess a little surprised by that only because of the comments on your severity. Six percent seemed low to me. I was expecting something to be a little bit higher than that. Given it was 6% there, frequencies only up 1%, and you've taken a lot of rates, why not more improvement in that loss ratio? I think first what I'd say on that is, you know, we have taken a lot of rate, but a lot of that has not earned in yet. I believe that we have, you know, we acted very quickly, and we have taken a lot of that rate, and a lot of those actions are behind us. I think we're still in the early stages of seeing that rate earn through the book. I'll turn it over to Frank, who can talk a little bit about the numbers. Yeah. I'd say additionally, when you look at quarter two versus quarter two, and you think about last year, we saw, you know, exceeding trends both in quarter three and in quarter four. Last year, the loss ratio actually got worse quarter two to quarter three and quarter three to quarter four. When you look at that, the 89% versus the 85%, we actually were up higher than the 89% around, you know, 94% later in the year. I think we've actually come down a lot in being able to mitigate some of those trends the back half of last year. Just to put some numbers to it, Mike, just to give you a sense that you know, just keep in mind on that severity, that 6 points, that's all in severity, so that's BI and the material damages coverages. You're going to see it higher on the material damage coverages. But just to give you a sense on the rate, you know, we've taken 28 points year-to-date, but we've only had about 6 points of that earn in in the second quarter. So if you look at our rate filings, they were really concentrated in the back half of the second quarter. You know, we still have quite a bit of rate to earn in over the course of the year. Okay. Thank you. That makes sense. I guess I was a little surprised by your quoted new premium volume that came from Carvana was about a third. I'm surprised that I was expecting that to be a little bit more than a third, given the focus on that channel. I know you're slowing down things, but still thought that would be a higher proportion of new business. Any reason why that was so low, or should I have been surprised? Hey, Mike, it's Dan, and good morning. Thanks for the question. Good morning. Good morning. I think for us, we don't necessarily have a target for in terms of what Carvana's new business is going to be as a percentage of our overall new business. For us, what we're excited about is the fact that we launched the fully embedded product, bringing it down from 24 screens to 3 screens is monumental. I just want to take a moment to call that out. Tremendous effort by the Carvana and Root teams, nights, weekends, and the like, to move from a soft launch of a product last October to putting that fully embedded product in market in July is really, really monumental. Now we think from here we have the ability to ramp up Carvana and do it the right way. Alex used the word prudent earlier. I think for us it's really about excitement around the channel. This is a really good partner for us to launch the embedded channel with. We see the attach rate continuing to improve, and we see a good quality customer coming through this. 80% of our Carvana customers have prior insurance. It's a newer car, higher coverage levels because of the auto financing that's in place in many cases, and the early signs in retention are positive. For us, it really is, let's focus on growing that channel the right way. Let's focus on then scaling that embedded product to other partners, which we're in active discussions on. That's going to be our focus on embedded for the back half of the year. Okay. Thanks, Dan. One more for me if I could here. I got a tone, I guess, from the letter and from your opening comments of kind of thinking about or pursuing other revenue channels. And so you mentioned, even Dan just mentioned, you know, other prospective partners maybe besides Carvana. Excluding that and excluding the digital agency that you mentioned there, excluding those two things, are there other things you're thinking about that would be a different revenue source for you guys besides the traditional insurance with Carvana and other partnerships and besides this digital agency? Thanks, Mike. On the digital agency, you know, we just launched that capability. We're live in three states now, and we do expect to continue to expand that offering and to bring more partners on to that platform. We think it's a really unique offering because it allows us to basically leverage our technology, which is what we are good at, and pair that with lots of different insurance offerings. As we continue to scale that, we do expect that to be a more meaningful portion long term of our revenue. I'll turn it over to Dan, who can talk a bit about some of the additional partnerships we're considering. Yeah, Mike, first would be, we're focused on what we think we are good at, the experience that we built up, the data that we built up in personal auto, and we think we have a long way to go in terms of the opportunity. Certainly what we have accomplished with Carvana has been transformational for our business and people are taking notice. We do see the opportunity to build out the embedded vertical with other partners. For us, it's about two things. Number one, stay focused on Carvana. There is still tremendous opportunity in front of us in the roadmap to enhance the customer experience, enhance the attach rate, and drive the Carvana product forward. Then the good news is we believe we can scale that product and take many aspects of it, into other areas and approach customers at a more meaningful point for them, to buy insurance as opposed, to traditional marketing. That is something that for us, we think offers better customer acquisition profile, a better customer profile, and we want to continue. From there, I think it's fair to say that the industry has taken notice of the rate filings that we have put in place, the success that Rob talked about earlier, the quick and decisive actions. We have had different carriers reach out, interested in how we're accomplishing some of that. We don't have any news to report on that front, but just frankly, good recognition that what we're doing in personal auto is gaining attention. People are seeing our technology working faster, and we think that'll offer opportunities for us to solidify the foundation and grow the business in the future. Okay. Thank you guys. Appreciate it. We will take our next question from Matt Carletti with JMP Securities. Your line is open. Hey, thanks. Good morning. Morning. Dan, I had a couple follow-ups on some of the comments you had there on Carvana. You know, I guess first one is, you know, apologize for maybe getting ahead of myself here. But as you think about, you know, whether it's Carvana or any other, you know, potential partner, just how do you think about, you know, how much is too much? When we think about, you talked about that channel ramping, that partnership ramping, and it's a third of new business coming in. If we fast-forward down the road, do you guys have a mindset around, you know, just concentration with any individual partner and how you might wanna potentially manage that? Good morning, Matt, and thanks for the question. Yeah, this is clearly the embedded channel and the embedded opportunity, and it starts with Carvana, but it will not be exclusively Carvana, for us as we go forward. I think diversification is really important. That said, we are seeing a diverse group of customers come through the Carvana channel, and it's a really attractive group of customers thus far, so we are excited to continue. I think our future in the embedded front is going to go in two directions. One is there is a lot more opportunity with Carvana on the roadmap. Leveraging the reconditioning centers, the last mile delivery capabilities that Carvana has throughout the United States to just provide a highly differentiated consumer experience from Carvana Insurance Built with Root. We're excited to come back with Carvana in the quarters ahead and talk about some of that opportunity on the product roadmap. Real customer benefits and opportunities coming in the future with Carvana. Second, we've learned so much. I can't emphasize enough how open a partnership that this has been with Carvana. You're putting together two digitally native companies focused on the consumer experience and really changing the consumer experience in insurance. A lot of that learning, a lot of the sharing back and forth, can be leveraged with other partners. The ability to understand the consumer, understand what the consumer wants to see in the personal auto insurance buying experience, is information that we can leverage elsewhere. I think there is gonna be opportunity for us to extend the platform, and stay tuned on that front. We're excited to come back to the market as we have future announcements to make. Great. Just a Carvana follow-up. Just, Dan, you mentioned, kind of just really attractive kind of customer profiles, you know, coming in through that partnership and that channel. Are there anything you can see, I know it's early days, but anything you can see in loss ratios or just kind of whether it's frequencies or severities of accidents of similar cohorts that have come through other channels that kind of give you a little more color on that? I'm just curious 'cause if I, you know, if I recall correctly, the Carvana channel is largely kind of not employing telematics, correct? I'm just trying to get a feel for kind of the rest of the book that has your telematics technology in it versus Carvana, which I believe at this point largely doesn't. That's right. To date, we haven't yet leveraged telematics in the Carvana space. This is Matt Bonakdarpour, by the way. Dan mentioned some of the early indicators that we saw as it pertains to customer demographics. We are seeing a more preferred customer based on prior insurance history and the like, vehicle age, compared to the Root direct book. Even when controlling for those demographics, we also see better than expected early indicators of both retention and loss ratio. It's still early days, but when we control for the customer demographics in the Carvana channel and we compare across the Root direct channel versus Carvana, we're seeing better than expected retention and loss ratio. This is very encouraging. It's a leading indicator, but we're keeping a close eye on it. Great. Very helpful. Thank you. As a reminder, it is star one if you would like to ask a question. We will take our next question from Josh Shanker with Cantor. Your line is open. Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. Notably, the gap between loss ratios for new and renewal business in seasoned states narrowed this quarter. Is this a reflection of your improved pricing models and telematics in seasoned states? Hi, this is Alex. When we look at the new versus renew loss ratios, I think one of the things is you should expect to see a lot of the new pricing actually hit the new business earlier, where there are things like rate capping in place, for example, for renewals. You will tend to see that new business loss ratio be a bit more of a leading indicator. I'm gonna turn it over to Frank to talk a little bit more about the particulars. Yep. That's right, both on the earning end, but also on the underwriting. A lot of the underwriting actions that we take hit new business first, and won't pertain as much to the renewals. Great. Thank you. Then in your letter, you mentioned that the 2Q loss ratio sequential pickup was driven by a mix of seasonality and inflationary pressure. Can you help quantify how much of that was in each bucket? You're talking about the seasonality from Q1 to Q2? Yes. Correct. Yep. We saw that both in our results and in industry results. I think it's hard to kind of tease that apart, the seasonality apart with the amount of rate that's earning in. Okay. Thank you. We will take our next question from Francois Maisonrouge with Evercore. Your line is open. Good morning. This year cash flow used in operating activities has trended in the $50 million-$55 million per quarter. Is this a good run rate for us to think about going forward? Hi, this is Rob. You talk about the first part of the year. If I look at the second part of the year, I would expect that to improve as we are completely focused on protecting the business, you know, strengthening the foundation of the company. We're doing everything we need to do to preserve cash. If you look at last year, we shut down our marketing spend in the second quarter. We've been taking rate over the last part of last year and all of this year. We had a expense reduction action in the first part of this year. We do expect for the back half of the year, our operating losses to be substantially lower than they were in the second part of last year. We would expect in the back half of this year for that the cash burn to be about the same as the first two quarters of this year, but maybe on a little accelerated basis. Got it. Thank you. Could you just elaborate, you know, on the adverse half a million PYD you took during the quarter? Yeah. There was, I think, some small unfavorability, unfavorable development in the reserves. You know, what that was largely driven by was a bit of an uptick in the severity on our PD and collision. We did see some reserve deterioration, but it was not material. It's not something that we believe, you know, is signs of weaknesses in our reserves. We still feel very confident in our booking. Great. Thank you. As a reminder, it is star one if you would like to ask a question. We will take our next question from Tommy McJoynt with KBW. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Going back to your answer to Matt's question on the loss performance of Carvana relative to customers where you applied telematics as part of the underwriting process prior to quoting and buying, does that surprise you that the performance there has been better? I would've thought there would've been maybe a difference there where the telematics would've actually played a larger impact. I think telematics certainly has a large impact, and we know it's one of the most predictive variables in our rating system in our direct business. Time and time again, we have seen that technology is very differentiated and that our ability to segment risk using mobile sensor data, we do believe is world-class. However, on Carvana, the interesting point there is it's actually a little bit of a different phenomenon, we believe, where consumers are buying that insurance for ease, not necessarily for price. You're not getting the same shopping dynamics. Obviously, you get a lot of favorability on the loss ratio too in terms of things like fraud, where if I just purchased a vehicle, I know that there's no preexisting damage to that vehicle. We are seeing a lot of sort of favorable selection, where we're seeing reduced sort of moral hazards too in that channel. I think that that's what you see driving maybe the benefit there. You know, the other thing I'll say is, you know, we expect the loss ratios to continue to materially improve. You know, even through this quarter to date, we are continuing to see our loss ratio materially improve across both Carvana and our direct business. Yeah, those are a couple good points. Thanks for pointing that out. In the past, you've talked about a high percentage of the workflow for rating changes being somewhat automated. Could you give us a little more detail on which parts of the process are automated? Is that process kind of what you're thinking of monetizing, perhaps to other carriers throughout the industry that are inquiring as to how you're able to take all the rate that you have? Yeah, thanks. This is Matt. We have invested a considerable amount of effort in our pricing platform that allows us to do the end-to-end research process from identifying new rating variables all the way through creating rate filing exhibits for the regulators in an automated fashion with very little software engineering input required. That way we've developed it is from a platform perspective to allow the users of the platform, the customers, being the data scientists, the actuaries, the state managers, to basically create configurations or select from dropdown menus exactly how they want to test different pricing elements, get the exhibits, compare them to our incumbent models, and automatically generate rate filing exhibits to send over to the regulators. Each of those components have become automated over time. Really, the only time we need an engineer to support a new rate filing is if we have a completely new data source that we have never used before. We have to create a connection to the third-party vendor, ingest that data, and then from there, we use the platform like everywhere else. Dan alluded to this before, but that platform has allowed us to act more quickly, and it's caught the attention of those in the industry. We have had active conversations about that platform and others. We do believe that it's this investment in our technology that has allowed us to not only identify the trends but act more quickly on them. Yeah. I might just add there that as we think about the over 30 rate increases that we've taken this year, over two-thirds of them have been complete rate plan upgrades, not just base rate increases. There's a lot of companies that can just raise rates 5, 7, 8% fairly quickly. But it's much harder throughout the industry, and it takes much longer to be able to update all of your factors. We've been able to. That automation that Matt was describing is across the board, so we've been able to completely upgrade the rate plans in most of our states this year. That's a good explanation. Thanks, guys. Thanks. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.