Good day, and welcome to the Root, Inc. Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Please note today's conference is being recorded. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star followed by the number one again. Thank you. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Jodi Baker, Vice President and Corporate Secretary. Ms. Baker, you may begin your conference. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. Root is hosting this call to discuss its third quarter 2022 earnings results. Participating on today's call are Alex Timm, Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, and Rob Bateman, Chief Financial Officer. During the question-and-answer portion of the call, our presenters will be joined by Dan Rosenthal, Chief Revenue and Operating Officer, Matt Bonakdarpour, Chief Technology Officer, and Frank Palmer, Chief Insurance Officer. Last evening, Root issued a shareholder letter announcing its financial results. While this call will reflect items discussed within that document, for more complete information about our financial performance, we also encourage you to read our third quarter 2022 Form 10-Q, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission last evening. Before we begin, I want to remind you that matters discussed on today's call will include forward-looking statements related to our operating performance, financial goals, and business outlook, which are based on management's current beliefs and assumptions. Please note that these forward-looking statements reflect our opinions as of the date of this call, and we undertake no obligation to revise this information as a result of new developments that may occur. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected and described today. In addition, we are subject to a number of risks that may significantly impact our business and financial results. For a more detailed description of our risk factors, please review our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, where you will see a discussion of factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from these statements, as well as our shareholder letter and third quarter 2022 Form 10-Q released last evening. A replay of this conference call will be available on our website under the Investor Relations section. I would also like to remind you that during the call, we will discuss some non-GAAP measures while talking about Root's performance. You can find reconciliations of those historical measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measures in our shareholder letter released last evening and our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC, which are posted on our website at ir.joinroot.com. I will now turn the call over to Alex Timm, Root's Co-founder and CEO. Thank you, Jodi. I want to take today's call and back up a minute to remind everyone of why we built Root. During the last year, we have continued to comment on how our technology has allowed us to recognize one of the worst inflationary environments to ever hit the auto insurance industry. We have continually communicated how that technology allows us to drive loss ratio improvement above and beyond anyone else in the industry. In Q3, this is exactly what you saw. We improved our loss ratio 14 points year-over-year, while most others in the industry had their loss ratio go in the other direction. This effectively tripled the margins of our business, and we are continuing to see loss ratio improvements. We have done this while improving our ability to segment risk, underwrite risk, and classify risk using what we believe is the very best technology in predictive analytics and software development. That improvement is the bedrock of our ability to profitably scale, but it is just step one. Step two is building differentiated access to customers. We have further invested in our product innovation through our embedded channel. Even during this runaway inflationary environment, we were able to further differentiate our product as demonstrated by 200% growth on our embedded platform year to date. What's more, we believe this channel offers extremely attractive conversion rates, acquisition costs, and underwriting ratios. We are progressing towards finalizing our second embedded partnership and look forward to providing further details in the months ahead. We believe we're at the very beginning of a massive shift in auto insurance distribution and that we are at the tip of the spear. In our direct channel, we are focusing on only writing clearly profitable business with an immediate return. This means utilizing our deep understanding of customer segmentation and geography to drive profitable new writings with very limited marketing spend. By leveraging our ability to quickly retrain our loss models, we can drive frequent increases to the sophistication and accuracy of our prices. We believe we are in a position to drive growth in the most profitable segments as we go forward. Over the last year, one thing has been made crystal clear. Root must control its own destiny. To do this, we are driving the company to profitability. Year-over-year, we have reduced our operating cash consumption by 55%. As part of this, we had to make the difficult decision to separate with 17% of our workforce yesterday. At the same time, we continue to right-size our non-headcount expenses. Together, these actions will lower our run rate expenses by roughly $50 million annually. I would like to thank the customers and shareholders that have been with us on this journey. I would also like to share my gratitude with all Root employees, current and past. I am grateful for their hard work and contributions to Root. I'll now turn the call over to Rob to discuss our operating results in more detail. Thanks, Alex. Our full GAAP financial results are disclosed in the shareholder letter we published yesterday evening, but I want to focus on a few key highlights. On the top line, gross written premium declined 26% year-over-year to $150 million. Our gross earned premium decreased 18% year-over-year to $155 million. The top line's decline reflects higher rates and stricter underwriting in underperforming geographies and customer segments, along with a 91% reduction in marketing spend compared with the third quarter of 2021. These actions have caused new business writings to decrease, with renewals making up 79% of gross earned premium this quarter as we focus on profitability. We are committed to lowering the loss ratio and expenses to further reduce operating losses. During the third quarter, the operating loss was $55 million, a 57% improvement over prior year. Adjusted EBITDA, a KPI we introduced this year to give a clearer view of the underlying performance of our business, excluding certain non-cash items, improved 62%. Gross accident period loss ratio was 79% for the third quarter, a 14-point improvement versus the third quarter of 2021. Our ability to recognize and respond to loss trend early, along with a higher weight of renewal premium, have driven consistent year-over-year improvement. Year to date, we have implemented 41 rate filings with an average increase of 35%, representing 97% of our total book. In addition, we have filed revised contracts in 25 states to tighten underwriting, refine our fee schedules, and reduce premium leakage. Going forward, we will continue to take rate in response to inflationary trends and in states where we are actively working to address profitability concerns. In combination with the markets where we believe we have adequate pricing, we forecast this approach will allow our loss ratio to continue to improve to our target levels and generate capital over the long term. As Alex discussed, we have taken further expense action to decrease cash burn. We are moving closer to our optimal cost structure by further reducing both headcount and non-headcount expenses. We expect these actions to collectively reduce run rate expenses by roughly $50 million annually. The fourth quarter will include a restructuring charge of approximately $10.5 million-$11.5 million, including fourth quarter cash expenditures of approximately $7 million-$7.5 million. We ended the third quarter with $629 million of unencumbered capital, compared with roughly $696 million at the end of the second quarter. Our operating cash consumption has dropped 55% year to date. We are continuing to enact measures to reduce cash burn as we are focused on strengthening the financial foundation of the company. Turning to our outlook, we expect our results to reflect the actions we are taking as we navigate through this challenging environment. We anticipate that the gross written premium decline will continue into next year as growth in our embedded channel is overshadowed by declines in our direct channel as we focus on accretive business. We expect continued year-over-year improvement in Adjusted EBITDA and operating loss in the fourth quarter, though to a lesser degree than the first nine months as our cost-cutting efforts begin to improve the bottom line in the fourth quarter of 2021. We are making progress against our strategic priorities, though recognize there is further work to be done. By focusing our efforts in capital deployment in areas we believe will produce immediate returns, we believe we are positioning Root to reach profitability and create long-term shareholder value. With that, we look forward to your questions. At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, press star, then one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Michael Phillips with Morgan Stanley. Good morning. Thank you, everybody. First question relates to kind of some of your wording in the letter. Profitable new writings in our direct channel with limited marketing. Kind of expand upon that, what you meant, and limited marketing up there. As you look out over whatever time period, three, five years, what's your mix that you're looking to do for embedded versus direct? Because you do say, you know, that it's going to be the primary focus of your new business. Yeah, thanks for the question. This is Daniel Rosenthal, and good morning. Look, we think embedded is a real—it's a really special opportunity as we go forward. We're seeing the product prove out with better unit economics, a better customer experience. The technology that only we have can really service those needs and drive a superior experience. So that is our focus. We don't put a percentage on it, but you can see in the letter a really nice trend line for the percentage of our new writings that are coming from Embedded, and we look forward to growing that in the quarters ahead. On the direct channel and really for much of 2022, you're seeing that continue. We have narrowed our focus to areas that are immediately profitable. We leverage our technology and our learnings to help us find the profitable segments in direct, and that's where our focus has been. Again, going forward, there will be a greater emphasis on embedded as we continue. I guess. Thank you, Dan. I guess, you know, as I think about without probably just spilling the beans on your upcoming announcement for the next partnership. But when I think about the universe of embedded for auto insurance, I think, okay, well, the OEMs, and I think most of the OEMs already have some kind of partnership with somebody. So can you maybe just, again, without getting specific with your upcoming announcement, but can you help me, give me an educational 101 on, like, what else should I be thinking about for where embedded can be in auto insurance? Yeah, absolutely. Look, it's starting with real success in the Carvana partnership. Growth of 200% year to date with a lot more on the product roadmap in the quarters ahead is exciting. As we mentioned in the shareholder letter, we're progressing towards finalizing our next embedded partner. We expect to have an announcement in the coming months, and we've got multiple additional prospects in various stages of discussion, with more than one of those advancing rapidly. As we enter 2023, we're gonna ramp up our business development and our product work, going forward on embedded. Our focus is meeting consumers at logical points as companies expand out their platforms, look to generate revenue across their existing customer bases. That it will include companies in the auto sector and the financial services sector. There's actually quite a wide breadth that are interested in learning more about our embedded product and our speed to produce the bindable quote within 45 seconds. Specifically with the auto OEMs, a lot of the partnerships that you sort of read about that are in place are not really truly embedded. They don't compare to the product that we have with Carvana. They are not driving a bindable quote within 45 seconds. They are not meeting consumers with a differentiated experience. We think that there will be opportunities in the quarters ahead, again, across a lot of different sectors to just meet consumers at logical places and build out the embedded channel. It starts with getting the product right. It starts with getting the technology right. Our learnings that we really have an industry-leading embedded technology that helps our partners quickly integrate a seamless bind experience. That quality, that differentiation is going to be appealing to a lot of folks. Okay. Thank you, Dan. Last one if I could. You had a bullet on your frequency severity. What's driving the declines, continued declines in frequency for you guys? What are you assuming going forward as you do your pricing? Sure. I'll start with as we going forward, assuming in our pricing, we've got higher net trends around 9%-10%. We are seeing kind of flat this year vehicle prices. When you look year-over-year, we're seeing higher severity trends than we see, like, in the most recent six months. On the frequency, we do have mixed shifts in our business. We've got some more towards more profitable or more tenured preferred segments. We also have the shift from new to renewal. All of those will kind of contribute to a lower frequency, higher severity. We are seeing some decrease in mileage in third quarter seasonality versus earlier in the year. Okay. Thank you, guys. Appreciate it. Your next question comes from the line of Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. Hi. Thanks. Good morning. My first question, you know, you guys provided, you know, information right around headcount reduction. You guys are also focusing, right, on bringing in new embedded relationship. 'Cause I know you said that, you know, gross premium should decline into next year. You know, do you guys have a sense of when, you know, you might start returning to growth or just or also a sense of just the level of declines we'll see the start of next year relative to what we've, you know, seen it, you know, in the third quarter and throughout 2022? Yeah. Good morning, Elyse. First, I would say we are in growth mode when you look at our embedded channel. We have grown those new writings 200%, year to date, and we expect to continue to grow that channel for us. We think that there is a huge amount of opportunity in that channel. We do believe that we are well positioned for growth in that highly differentiated channel, and that's based on our technology. In terms of when we expect premium declines in our guidance and go forward, I'll turn it over to Rob, who could talk a bit about our expectations. Yeah. I think our expectations, Elyse, as Rob mentioned, is that you know, premium will decline going into next year and possibly into 2024 as the direct book sort of runs down in states that we have accreted business, and we spend very little on direct marketing, and as we wrap up with additional partners in the embedded channel. Okay. You guys, right, have continued to take a good amount of price rate increases. I guess, where are you in terms of the rate increases? What do you expect, I guess, to the balance of this year and into 2023 from a rate increase perspective throughout your book of business? In quarter three, we took 13 rate increases. As mentioned earlier, we've taken 41 throughout this year. We've still got about 13, somewhere between 10% and 15% rate that's still earning in. We're monitoring, as I mentioned earlier, we've got trend selects, future trend selects of around 10%. We're kind of monitoring those trends and seeing how those pan out, but we are planning to continue aggressively taking rate as long as we are seeing those types of aggressive trends. Then last one, like you guys did point out, right, that the, you know, underlying loss ratio did, you know, get trend better in the quarter. Would you expect that to continue? Yeah, we do expect that to continue, and we've seen continued progression through October. We do with that rate earning in with an on-level loss ratio that is materially below our Q3 loss ratio. We expect continued improvements until we hit our targets. Thank you. Thanks. Your next question comes from the line of Yaron Kinar with Jefferies. Thank you. Good morning, everybody. First question, going back to the frequency improvement. So I think you call out mix change as part of the driver there. Can you maybe elaborate on that a little bit? Do you see that as a direct impact from the Carvana embedded growth, or is there something else? I guess the reason I'm asking this is just I am trying to figure out if there's a risk that maybe we see that loss ratio while still improving, maybe not improving as much if frequency trends stabilize. Yeah. I think. This is Frank. When I think of those loss trends, again, we're pricing to 10% future increased trends, so we're expecting losses to go up 10%. You know, frequency going down or severity going up, that mix, we're more concerned about the total. Now we know that new business has higher losses than renewals, so if we start to grow more, you're gonna see that frequency severity shift, you know, go up. If we're taking overall enough rate to maintain the loss ratio, even if you saw frequency go up, you'd still expect the loss ratio to go down if we're taking enough rate. That's the way we look at it. Some of those mix shifts to your question, yes, are into more profitable segments. Some of that is mix shifting into Carvana. Some of that is with our new segmentation models. We're seeing more preferred segments get lower rates, and so we're seeing a mix shift into those segments, as well as the new renewals mix shift that we're seeing. All of those kind of combine to that frequency decrease. It's again that's an observed frequency severity, you know, quarter three- over- quarter three, not necessarily what we expect going forward. Got it. Thank you. With the headcount actions that you took overnight, I think those come on top of actions earlier in the year. Can you maybe talk a little bit about where the reduction is coming from? Is it broad-based or is it concentrated in specific units? Maybe how do we as outsiders look at this and have confidence that you're not cutting to the bone? Yeah. Thanks for that question, Yaron. Where we are focused right now is on driving the company to profitability. We have been taking aggressive expense action throughout the year on both headcount and non-headcount. We have materially reduced our cash fixed expenses year to date. We think that that is appropriate given the increase in cost of capital, given the uncertain environment that we are in, and we believe that that's very necessary. Now, I will point out in terms of cutting to the bone, during that period where we were eliminating almost 50% of our cash fixed expenses, we were still able to ship what we believe is an incredibly innovative product with Carvana and actually grow that product 200% almost entirely through product improvements and innovation in the flows and the experience for customers. We do not believe that we are, you know, cutting to the bone. In addition, we were able to make meaningful segmentation improvements, and continue to make meaningful segmentation improvements in our models. We are still actually able to keep the momentum going forward. Rob, do you want to comment a bit on where exactly the expense savings are occurring? If you think about what we're talking about is more of a, you know, a pivot to embedded growth. If you were to look at our headcount reductions, they really were around marketing and other things. Marketing employees, personnel that support and other areas that support the direct channel. Just other areas that we just felt that we needed to, you know, we needed to take some headcount out as our premium comes down. Got it. Thanks so much for the answers, and good luck. Thanks, Yaron. Your next question comes from the line of Matt Carletti with JMP. Thanks. Good morning. I just have one question left that a lot of others have been answered. In your letter, you say that we believe we have the ability to reach breakeven in the coming years. My question is the caveat to that, you know, without raising additional capital, or do you see that happening, you know, with the need for additional capital down the road? Matt, this is Rob. I would say we believe we have enough capital to execute our strategy in the coming years. If you look at the combination of the reductions we're taking on the loss ratio, we're implementing policyholder fees, minimizing marketing expense, and, you know, reducing expenses. Even this year, we're gonna invest about $400 million of our cash to take advantage of the interest rates. We're doing everything we can to either reduce cash burn or generate cash. We look at the growth trajectory You know, over the next couple of years with embedded, we believe we have enough capital to execute that strategy. Yeah, what we really want to do is control our own destiny. That's all, you know, what we're talking about around here a lot, is what do we have to do to control our own destiny, through both, you know, like I said, expense reductions and through the underwriting and even in the investment stuff that we're doing. The other thing I'd say, you know, of course, that always just depends on what happens in the macro environment. You know, the way we look at it now with the actions we've taken and what we've done in the past and going forward, we think we can. We have the runway to execute our strategy. Great. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thanks, Matt. Your next question comes from the line of Tracy Benguigui with Barclays. Thank you. Good morning. I think I heard you comment that you expect to take some rate actions, and these rates you're still earning in. If I could get some clarity on a comment you made in your shareholder letter where you mentioned you believed you have achieved rate adequacy in a significant number of your markets. How much of that book does significant markets represent, and what gives you confidence that you've achieved rate adequacy? Sure. This is Frank. As we think about the, you know, the overall loss ratio, that certainly varies greatly by state. For example, California hasn't allowed rate increases for almost two years. In that, you know, we're not rate adequate there. We've pulled back, greatly shrank our writings there. We are rate adequate now, we think in between five and 10 states. We do have rates still rolling in in those states. Then there's other states that we expect to be rate adequate in the next year. We're starting to, as we talk about that focused marketing, we're doing limited amounts of focused marketing, targeting some of those states where we believe we are rate adequate, and then in particular segments where we think can be capital accretive in the short term. Yeah. I'd add, you know, when we look at the third quarter, you know, we have an on-level loss ratio, so accounting for all of the rates that we have already taken. This does not even account for the future rate we will take. We are seeing an on-level loss ratio in the low 60s. As we've publicly said, you know, our long-term target is 65%, so that gives us a lot of confidence when you look at the book of business that we have taken appropriate action to get to rate adequacy in many, many areas. What percentage of your book premium-wise do those five to 10 states represent? About 40%. Okay. Just going back to the frequency comments about the improvement, you said you're not expecting that to continue. When you come up with your loss picks, are you saying you're booking a number that reflects your prospective view and not what you're seeing now on the frequency side? Correct. We're pricing to expected future loss trends, which as I mentioned we're seeing between 9% and 10%, and not necessarily on the year-over-year. Right? So again, what we publish for frequency and severity are year-over-year or quarter three to quarter three. You know, last year you had dramatically increasing physical damage, but not as much on the liability or medical costs. This year we're seeing much flatter on the physical damage severity. Used car prices have been flat most of this year, but we're seeing some increase in litigation and medical costs. I wouldn't set the prices based on the frequency severity of quarter three over quarter three. We're setting our future rate need and future rate expectations based upon that, you know, in total about 10% going forward. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of David Motemaden with Evercore. Thanks. Good morning. In the press release you mentioned the goal of decreasing cash burn next year. Can you quantify that for us? How much less cash burn would you be expecting in 2023? Well, this is Rob. You know, like I said earlier in the call, we're doing everything we can to decrease cash burn and generate cash. We expect our cash burn to be substantially less next year than it was this year. We haven't published a number yet on that, but we do expect it to be significantly lower than this year. You can see year-over-year, if you look at our Adjusted EBITDA, you know, we improved 62% there year-over-year. We plan to, you know, with the rate actions we're taking, the loss ratio improvements, the things we're doing on fees, expense reductions we've taken, and as well as, you know, other things we're doing with the business, we do expect the cash burn to be significantly lower next year. Got it. Thanks. Just on the timing of the $50 million annual expense savings, when would you expect to reach that full $50 million? Well, the headcount reductions piece will reach for the full year of 2023. On the non-headcount reduction it will take for the full year to recognize the rest of that $50 million. Got it. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Mark Hughes with Truist. Yeah, thanks. Good morning. Can you talk about your posture towards reinsurance? What you see in terms of of pricing dynamics, how much you intend to perhaps rely on reinsurance on a go-forward basis? Hi, this is Rob again. On the reinsurance market, if you think about our program, we have a number of treaties in our program. We have a typical catastrophe treaty for auto. We also have a you know, single occurrence XOL. But our primary capital support is through quota share agreements. We have a total of three quota share agreements that we renew each year. Right now, what we're seeing in the market, we've been able to, for the most part, get the terms that we want to get. We haven't really seen a lot of pressure on the terms and pricing for us. We have taken our quota shares down by you know, pretty small amounts. For example, one of them, we went from the 35% quota share to a 30% quota share. We really haven't seen our terms tightening much. We do expect that as our loss ratio gets better, however, that we will pull back on the quota shares over time. Our quota shares include some loss corridors that are a bit punitive that we'd like to, as we move over time, remove those loss corridors from our agreements. I didn't get that number, but the unencumbered capital at the end of the quarter, what was that number? Yeah, Rob, this is. I think it was in there. Yeah, it's after. Yeah, after. Yeah, it's in the script. If it's not immediately available, I'll look at the transcript. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Brian Meredith with UBS. Hey, thanks. A couple of quick questions here for you. First, did you have any losses from Hurricane Ian? Was there any CAT losses in the quarter? Because I know there's some auto loss in that hurricane. Hi, Brian, this is just to go back on the last question. It was $629 on the unencumbered cash at the end of the quarter. On Ian, we had essentially nothing. We don't have a lot of exposure in Florida. If you think about it, we just started writing in Florida a couple of months ago. Our exposure, the number of claims we've gotten in are very minimal at this point. Great. That's helpful. My next question, I'm just curious. You know, there's been a lot of press on Carvana recently with respect to their financial situation. I guess my question is more, you know, is there much more to do with respect to rolling out that relationship as far as work or investment that Carvana needs to make? Have you seen any slowdown at all in that? Is there any financial ramifications back to you in the event something does happen with Carvana? Hi, Brian. This is Dan, and good morning. Thanks for the question. No question, economic conditions are impacting car sales on a macro level. We believe the Carvana team is focused in the right areas. Frankly, where economic conditions are is driving an even higher focus on gross profit per unit, and that means an even higher focus on the insurance product. The product roadmap that we are building is being proven out. We expect it to improve the attach rate next year, and there's focus from both companies on doing so, which is wonderful for our embedded product. As far as the second part of your question, no, I can't foresee any financial ramifications with the agreement that we have in place with Carvana. It's pretty straightforward that, as they continue to sell cars, we're focused on driving attach rate and ultimately leading to new writings. Again, we believe that the macroeconomic conditions around car sales are not gonna have a negative impact in our ability to drive new writings. Makes sense. Thank you. I just wanted to quickly slip in here. I'm noticing that the renters PIF has been declining, you know, sequentially for a little while. Can you just remind us what's going on with that business? Yeah. We have renters really as a cross-sell opportunity. It's a very low premium product, so we don't look to acquire monoline renters. It's just hard to ever recoup the customer acquisition cost. It is a cross-sell product that is primarily active in our direct channel. As we have deprioritized to some extent the direct channel in favor of growing the embedded channel, we have seen those the PIF and the policies enforced there decline. Yeah, Brian, I think. This is Dan. I think what you're seeing from us is just a laser focus on execution and prioritization. We've been running one play, this play for more than a year, and you heard from Alex and Frank, it's been paying off. We've turned the corner in terms of leveraging our technology and improving our pricing and underwriting foundation. Now we've just got to continue to chart the course for driving the embedded growth and driving that continued focus and prioritization. That's what we're focused on executing. Sure. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Josh Siegler with Cantor Fitzgerald. Hi, guys. This is Keelan on for Josh. Good morning. The growth in the Carvana product's been really impressive, and exciting to hear that you're close to closing a second embedded partnership. Will the lessons learned and work you did on Carvana make a second embedded product easier to bring to market and scale? And are you able to add any detail around what a second embedded rollout might look like? Yeah. Thanks for the question, Josh. This is Dan. We're really excited about the opportunities in the embedded product. That's what you're hearing from us. What we see as we build the channel is we're really going to have two types of products and two types of partners. One that's more customized, focused on the underlying customer, focused on the opportunities within that particular partner and within that particular channel. We are seeing opportunities there to leverage the learnings from Carvana, what has worked, what has not worked, into creating a more successful customized product for other partners. We're also finding that in order to drive new writings volume in a positive way, we can leverage those learnings to create more of an off-the-shelf product, so that we can drive that faster and more seamless integration with partners that don't require the significant level of customization. That's part of how we're going to be able to drive new writings with the team and the resources that we have in place. Understood. That's really helpful. Thank you. Thanks, Josh. Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Kligerman with Credit Suisse. Hey, good morning. First question, just need a little more clarification on how you're pricing to 10% increases in rates for future losses. Does that mean that your work is not done, that you really across the board have to take more rate this year? Yeah. Is it coming from, you know, I think you were saying it's coming from areas like litigation and, you know, social inflation. Maybe elaborate on why you need that. Absolutely. When we think about where we are today, again, when we look at the current loss levels and the current level of where we're seeing severities come in and frequencies come in, you know, we do believe, given our on-level loss ratio being in the low 60s%, that we are broadly rate adequate across many, many markets for where loss costs are today. That said, going forward, we do believe that as inflation continues, whether it's from social inflation, medical inflation, labor inflation, parts inflation, whatever it may be, we do believe that we need to continue to take rates as the entire industry will need to continue to take rates to keep up with an ever-rising cost inside of our claims costs. That's what we're talking about when we say a 10% forward trend, is that we wanna take at least 10% rate sort of going forward so that we can keep up with inflation. Got it. Hard to say exactly where, but you're feeling it and you expect that inflation to continue. Is that the right way to think about it? That's the right way to think about it. I will note we're seeing right now in our actual numbers something lower than what we are assuming going forward. We are in a very conservative stance, we believe, with a 10% forward trend. Got it. With your loss ratio having improved so much, when we think about Carvana, which is a lot newer than direct, how's the profitability there? Could you share anything around the loss ratios on your Carvana business to date? Absolutely. We're seeing materially better loss ratios on the Carvana and Embedded business. That's largely driven why we believe is because a lot of these customers are actually purchasing for ease, not necessarily price. When a customer purchases on Carvana, they actually are comparing us against fewer options than when they purchase on our direct channel. We also believe that we've eliminated some moral hazards, so there's less fraud in that channel. All of the leading indicators, although it is early, are looking very positive on the Carvana loss ratios. It is outperforming our direct business from when we look at just those first-term early indicators on loss ratio. Got it. Then just lastly, you know, congrats on the second embedded product. What are you seeing in terms of competition for that business? I'm sure a lot of the big auto players are taking notice of what you're doing. Are you seeing a lot of competition as you aim to write Embedded business? If you could elaborate on, you know, how that's playing out, that would be great. Yeah, this is Dan. Thanks for the question. We are seeing a lot of people talk about embedded. When you think about what Alex just said around ease and around the customer experience, we are not seeing competition in terms of the product that we offer. We are leveraging the technology that we have built to have our partners quickly integrate a seamless buying experience for their customers. We're doing so, I think, faster than others for two reasons. One, we've built the technology stack in the right way, and it allows us to access everything interconnected in a very, very fast manner. Number two, you're hearing from us that embedded is our priority. We are driving embedded auto insurance as our top priority for growth. As Alex said, we're already in growth mode. We are already leveraging the foundation that Frank and team and Matt and team have helped build around the pricing and underwriting side, to go forward with the embedded growth. Driving that prioritization is something that partners and prospective partners are really feeling from us. When they interact with us, and they ask questions, and they say, "Can you introduce this product?" Or, "Can you introduce this level of customization to address a specific customer need?" We are able to respond very, very fast. We have an embedded team that is second to none, that is deeply passionate about creating a differentiated customer experience that is going to have an impact on the way consumers buy their car insurance for many, many years to come, and that's what our prospective partners are feeling. They're feeling just a speed to market, and a level of customization that no one else has. Interesting. Actually, it gives me one last follow-on. You know, just given what you announced today with the second partner, and what you just said, does this give you a lot of optimism about 2023, and that we'll be hearing about more and more partners that you'll be binding? Yeah. Thanks for the question. So just to be clear, we're not announcing a second partner today. We're announcing multiple partners deep into the funnel, and frankly, just excitement around the product. Look, I don't wanna be over-exuberant on this. We think that we have built a product that is highly differentiated and showing very, very clear success with our launch partner, and as Alex said, we've scaled those new writings 200% year to date. Now we're gonna continue to do so, but we wanna make sure that we choose the right partners, that we build the right products, and then that we test those products in the right states with the right customer segments and then scale them. That's our focus. I am not promising significant embedded new writing growth next quarter, and I don't want you to think that. I want you to understand that embedded insurance is our top priority from a growth perspective. We are seeing it work, and we are going to continue to invest in scaling the channel from here. Awesome. Thanks a lot. Your final question comes from the line of Tommy McJoynt with KBW. Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just a quick follow-up or two actually on Mark's earlier question on reinsurance. Just confirming if I heard your comments correctly that you have not seen and are not expecting any changes in the ceding commission on those quota share contracts. Yeah. We've seen very minimal change on the ceding commission. What we've done is when we've gotten non-concurrent terms to the firm order terms we put out there, we've just backed off on our quota share percentage. You know, we're sticking to what our firm order terms are and just backing off if we see non-concurrent terms. Now that said, we do see some of the terms within the contracts actually improving a bit when it comes to the loss corridor as our loss ratio gets better, which is what you would expect. Got it. Just remind me, are your quota share agreements staggered or what's the setup of those? They're both. The way they work is they're multiyear agreements that are risk attaching. If we have a risk that we write this year, that quota share will stay with that risk for the period that it's on the books for up to about four, I think it's four years, depending on the contract, for the four years. Thanks. Just last one, is there a long-term sort of steady state level for the quota share percentage that you envision? There is, we just haven't gotten there yet. We haven't, we still have some analysis to do around it. Okay. No problem. Thanks.