Good day, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Great Ajax Corp. Q1 2021 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. If you require any further assistance, please press star zero. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Lawrence Mendelsohn. Please go ahead. Thank you very much. Thank you everybody for joining us for our first quarter 2021 conference call. Before we get started, I'd like to just point out page two with the safe harbor disclosure for you all to read at your leisure. With that, we can jump to page three, the business overview. Q1 2021 was a very good quarter in many ways. Our overall corporate cost of funds further decreased by approximately 29 basis points, and our asset-based cost of funds decreased by even more. Our cost of funds has continued to decrease into the second quarter of 2021 as well. Our significant increase in loan performance and loan cash flow velocity continued from Q4 and has also continued into the second quarter of 2021. This increase in loan cash flow velocity led to an additional acceleration of purchase discount on loans that paid off during Q1 2021 of $5.5 million, as actual payoff proceeds exceeded expectations. We continue to be in an offensive position. At March 31, 2021, we had approximately $137 million of cash and a significant amount of unencumbered bonds, unencumbered beneficial interest, and unencumbered mortgage loans as well. As of April 30, 2021, we have approximately $144 million of cash and still have a significant amount of unencumbered bonds, beneficial interest, and mortgage loans. The significant cash balance does create earnings drag, and the significant cash flow velocity from our mortgage loans and mortgage loan JV structures reduces our loan and securities portfolio leverage. We are, however, very well equipped for volatility and the investment potential it creates, and we have good opportunities in our pipeline, as we'll talk about later in this call. Our manager's strength in analyzing loan characteristics and market metrics for reperformance probabilities and reperformance pathways, and our manager's ability to source these mortgage loans enables us to acquire loans that we believe have a material probability of long-term continuing reperformance and full payoff. We've acquired loans in 332 different transactions since 2014, six transactions in the first quarter of 2021. Remember, we own just under 20% of our manager. Additionally, our affiliated servicer provides a strategic advantage in non-performing and non-regular paying loan resolution processes and timelines, and a data feedback loop for our manager's analytics. In today's environment, having our portfolio teams and analytics group with the manager working closely with the servicer is quite essential to maximize reperformance probabilities loan by loan by loan. We have certainly seen the benefit of this in Q3 and Q4 of 2020 and in Q1 of 2021, and so far in Q2 of 2021, with a significant increase in loan cash flow velocity and credit performance. The analytics and sourcing of the manager and the effectiveness of our affiliated servicer also enables us to broaden our investment reach through joint ventures with third-party institutional investors. This gives us access to seeing more loans from more sources and more ways of financing it as well. We have a 20% economic interest in our servicer, similar to our manager. On March 31, 2021, our corporate leverage ratio was 2.3 x. Our Q1 2021 average asset-based leverage was 2.1 x, and our March 31, 2021, asset-based leverage was 2x. We also have an investment in Gaea Real Estate Corp., a REIT that invests in multifamily properties, multifamily repositioning mezzanine loans, and triple net lease veterinary clinic real estate. We expect Gaea to grow materially also in 2021. If we jump to page four, I'll walk you through some highlights of the first quarter. Net interest income from loans and securities, including a $5.5 million acceleration of loan purchase discount from payoffs in excess of our expectations. This is $4.3 million after deconsolidating approximately $1.2 million to non-controlling interests, was approximately $19.2 million in Q1 2021. In the first quarter, we had only a small increase in our average balance of mortgage loans, securities, and beneficial interests, primarily due to significant loan prepayment. Approximately $30 million investment in re-performing loans closed March 31 and was on the balance sheet for one day. As a result, we received no income benefit from that acquisition of $31 million on March 31. Our gross interest income, excluding the $5.5 million income from loan purchase discount acceleration, was slightly lower than Q4 2020, but net interest income was $300,000 higher due to reduced cost of funds, even though our average liability balance was $60 million higher for the quarter due to timing differences. Interest expense decreased by approximately $500,000, even though we had a 27-day timing difference between new securitization issuance and call dates on called securitizations. We paid an extra 27 days of interest on two securitizations, which increased interest expense by approximately $400,000, or nearly $0.02 per share. Otherwise, interest expense would have decreased by approximately $900,000 for the quarter versus Q4 2020. A GAAP item to keep in mind is that interest income from our portion of joint ventures shows up in income from securities, not interest income from loans. For these joint venture interests, servicing fees for securities are paid out of the securities waterfall. Our interest income from joint venture securities is net of servicing fees, unlike interest income from loans, which is gross of servicing fees. As a result, since our joint venture investments have been growing faster than our direct loan investments, GAAP interest income will grow more slowly than if we directly purchased loans by the amount of the servicing fees, and GAAP servicing fee expense will decrease by the corresponding offsetting amount. An important part of discussing interest income is the payment performance of our loan portfolio. At March 31, approximately 73.1% of our loan portfolio by UPB made at least 12 of the last 12 payments, as compared to only 13% at the time we purchased the loans. This is also up from 72% at December 31, 2020. In our first quarter of 2020 investor call, we mentioned that we expected the COVID-19 related economic environment would negatively impact the percentage of 12 of 12 borrowers in our portfolio. Thus far, the impact on payment performance has been far less than expected, and the percentage of our portfolio that is 12 of 12 has been quite stable and increasing since Q4 of 2020. Additionally, we have seen significant prepayment from a material subset of our COVID-impacted borrowers that had significant absolute dollars of equity and were in strong home price appreciation locations. The continuing strong regular payment pattern and the prepayment pattern of certain previously delinquent loans led to the $5.5 million acceleration of purchase discount from prepayment of loans in excess of expectations in the quarter. Approximately 20% of all of our loan payoffs in full in Q1 2021 were from non-performing loans. While regular paying loans produce higher total cash flows over the life of the loans on average, they can extend duration, and because we purchase loans at discounts, this can reduce percentage yield on the loan portfolio and interest income. However, regular paying loans generally increase our NAV, as we'll see later in this call, enable financing at a lower cost of funds, and provide regular cash flow. Loans that are not in regular monthly pay status tend to have a shorter duration. However, we have generally expected that this duration reduction would be less than typical due to the impact of COVID-19. As I mentioned earlier, most of our loans were purchased as non-regular paying loans and the borrowers, our servicer and portfolio team, and our manager have worked together over time to reestablish these loans as regularly paying. We also expect that given the low mortgage rate environment and the stability of housing prices so far, that higher prepayments will likely continue for both regular paying and non-regular paying loans. We have certainly seen this trend continue into Q2 of 2021. Our cost of funds in Q1 2021 was lower than Q4 2020 by 29 basis points. This was primarily due to spread reductions on repurchase facilities and the two securitizations we completed in late January and early February 2021, and two securitizations that we called in late February 2021. We expect our cost of funds to continue decreasing materially, especially since we called three of our older securitizations and re-securitized the underlying loans in Q2 of 2021, and will likely do so with a few others in the next few quarters. Net income attributable to common stockholders was $7 million or $0.30 per share after subtracting out $1.95 million of preferred dividends and $1.7 million of income attributable to non-controlling interests. A couple of other things to note. We recorded a $911,000 expense, or approximately $0.04 per share, from the acceleration of amortization of deferred issuance costs as a result of calling our 2017 B and 2018 C securitizations in the first quarter. This would otherwise have been amortized over the remaining life of the securitizations if we had not called them. Also, as previously mentioned, since the new securitizations closed on average 27 days prior to the call date of the old securitizations, we double paid interest for 27 days of approximately $400,000 or nearly $0.02 a share. The interest cost savings from calling and re-securitizing the two securitizations is far greater than this per year. We expensed approximately $1.9 million relating to the GAAP required accrual of the warrant put rights from our Q2 2020 issuance of preferred stock and warrants. Also, in the first quarter, we repurchased approximately $2.5 million of our convertible bonds for $2.4 million. Book value per share was $16.18 at March 31, 2021. Later in this call, we will compare March 31 book value and March 31 fair value estimates. A quick spoiler alert, March 31 fair value estimates continue to be materially higher than book value. Taxable income was $0.38 per share. Taxable income in Q4 was driven by several factors, including gains on some clean pay loans going to our January 2021 rated securitization, as well as a significant increase in prepayment, especially for delinquent loans. Delinquent loans usually generate tax gains at the time of foreclosure and the creation of related REO and then tax losses at sale of REO. Less REO creation typically leads to lower taxable income. We saw many delinquent loans prepay and generate tax gains. As our cost of funds decreases, we'll have further declines in interest expense, which increases taxable income. Cash collections. At March 31, we had approximately $137 million of cash, and for Q1 2021, we had average daily cash and cash equivalent balance of approximately $115 million. We had $70.2 million of cash collections in the first quarter, which annualized, is approximately 25% of the book value of the underlying assets. Our surplus cash tempers earnings, but this provides us with significant optionality, and the related earnings drag should decrease as we get the cash invested over time. As I mentioned earlier in this call, at March 31, 2020, in addition to $144 million of cash, we also had approximately $266 million face amount of unencumbered securities from our securitizations and joint ventures, and approximately $43 million of UPB of unencumbered mortgage loans. As April 30, we have $144 million cash on hand, plus all those unencumbered assets. Securitizations. In Q1, we completed two securitizations and called two securitizations. The first securitization was a tranched, rated structure where we issued AAA through BBB bonds at approximately 85% of the unpaid principal balance attachment with a weighted average bond yield of 1.31%. The expected weighted average life of these issued bonds is approximately seven years. The second securitization was an unrated tranche structure where we issued only Class A senior securities at 75% of UPB with a yield of 2.25%. The expected weighted average life of this issued bond is approximately three-plus years. The two securitizations combined will reduce funding costs by approximately 150-plus basis points per year for the approximate $490 million UPB of the re-securitized loans versus the securitizations we called beginning in March of 2021. As I mentioned earlier on this call, approximately 73.1% of our portfolio by UPB made at least 12 of their last 12 payments, compared to only 13% at the time of loan acquisition. This difference creates material embedded peded loan value versus loan purchase cost. I will discuss the importance of this in greater detail when we get to pages nine and 17 of this presentation. If we jump to page five, we continue to be primarily RPL-driven with purchased RPLs representing approximately 96% of our loan portfolio. We primarily purchase RPLs that have made less than seven consecutive payments and strive for positive payment migration of these purchased RPLs and the resulting increase in fair market value of the loans from this payment migration. On page six, we continue to buy and own lower loan-to-value loans. Our overall RPL purchase price is approximately 51% of property value and 85.65% of UPB. When you compare this to our securitization advance rates, the collateral really stands out. On page seven, purchased NPLs have declined over time relative to the total loan portfolio. For NPLs on our balance sheet, our overall purchase price is 77.8% of UPB and 48.6% of property value. As a result of the low loan-to-value and higher absolute dollars of equity on our average for our RPL and NPL portfolios, we've seen that rising home prices and relatively low mortgage rates have significantly accelerated prepayment on our loans as borrowers can capture significant equity. This leads to greater interest income by accelerating the receipt of our loan purchase discount. On page eight, California continues to represent the largest segment of our loan portfolio. Our California mortgage loans are primarily in Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties. We have seen consistent payment and performance patterns from loans in these markets. Performance in Southern California has far outperformed expectation during the COVID-19 pandemic period. We have also seen consistent prepayment patterns, even more so in recent quarters. Since May of 2020, California prepayments represent nearly 40% of all our prepayments. Until May of 2020, we had been seeing material negative effects from the tax law SALT provisions in New York City Metro, in suburban New Jersey, in Southern Connecticut home values, and in home sale liquidity. We've seen a quick positive turn in liquidity in these suburban locations as a result of COVID-19 as New York City apartment dwellers look for suburban residences. It's too early to tell whether this is a short-term phenomena or a longer-term change in lifestyle as a result of COVID-19. It is also likely to be affected by any potential new tax law changes become affected. Related to this, we have also seen demand and prices for homes and home rentals increase materially in several metro areas of Florida, as well as the Phoenix, Dallas, Charlotte, Atlanta, and a few other metro areas. We're seeing this strength primarily in single-family homes, less so for condominiums. We have seen a significant increase in prepayment, however, on homes with material equity in the New York City metro area. On page nine, at March 31, approximately 73.1% of our loan portfolio made at least 12 of last 12 payments, including 67% of our portfolio that made at least 24 of the last 24 payments, compared to 13% at the time of purchase. Non-paying loans, which usually have shorter durations than paying loans, get timelines extended as a result of COVID-19. This affects the yield on true non-performing loans. However, in the past three quarters, and continuing so far into Q2 of 2021, we've seen the opposite. Prepayment of non-performing loans has accelerated duration on average rather than extended duration. Since we purchased most of our loans when they were less for 12 for 12, our servicers worked with the borrowers. It's too soon to understand the full impacts of COVID-19 on home price and mortgage performance. So far, the impact has been significantly positive. We've seen demand for homes in our target markets increase generally. Cash flow velocity on the loans increase generally, and prepayment in full on impacted loans has increased. 12 for 12 loans in today's loan market trade at materially higher prices than our cost basis, well over par. As a result, our portfolio and related implied corporate NAV estimates are materially higher than GAAP book value, which presents our loans at the lower of market or amortized cost. Subsequent events. It's been really busy since April 1st as well. Subsequent to March 31, we've agreed to purchase approximately $800 million UPB of RPLs in eight transactions, subject to due diligence. The purchase price for the loans was approximately 97% of UPB and 54% on the value of the underlying properties. We continued to buy low LTV RPLs with material amounts of equity. We have another approximately $91 million UPB of NPLs under contract to purchase in three transactions, also subject to due diligence. Purchase price is approximately 100% of UPB and 67% of underlying property value. In April, we called three joint venture securitizations, our 2017-D, 2018-A, and 2018-B. We re-securitized the combined loans in Ajax Mortgage Loan Trust 2021-C. The 2017-D structure was previously consolidated on our balance sheet and income statements. We retained 5% of the Class A senior bond of 2021-C and approximately 32% of the mezzanine bond and equity trust certificate. The issued Class A senior bond has a par coupon of 2.115%. In April, we repurchased another $5 million principal amount of our convertible notes for a purchase price of $5 million. We declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per share to be paid on May 31 to holders of record on May 20, 2021. On page 11, there's a few metrics I'd like to mention. Average loan yields excluding reserve recapture remained fairly constant. Remember that yield on debt securities and beneficial interest is net of servicing fees, and yield on loans is gross of servicing fees. Debt securities and beneficial interest is how our interest in our JVs are presented under GAAP. As our JVs increase as they did in 2020 relative to loans, the GAAP reporting will show lower average yields by the amount of the servicing fees. Our leverage continues to be low, especially for companies in our sector. We ended Q1 with asset level debt of 2x and average asset level debt for the quarter was 2.1x. Our asset level debt cost of funds was lower in Q1 than Q4 by approximately 35 basis points, and the cost of our asset level debt has further declined in Q2. As we get our surplus cash invested, we should see material increases in interest income and net interest income as well. Also, as we repurchase our convertible notes in the open market, our cost of funds and interest expense further decreases. If we jump to page 13, our total repurchase agreement related debt at March 31 was approximately $305 million, of which $42 million was non-mark-to-market mortgage loan financing and $216 million was financing on Class A1 senior bonds in our joint ventures. As of April 30, total repurchase agreement funding is lower as a result of prepayment and securitization. At March 31, we had $173 million face of unencumbered bonds, as well as $96 million UPB of unencumbered trust certificates in our joint ventures, and $44 million UPB of unencumbered mortgage loans. Combined with $137 million of cash at March 31, and now $144 million of cash as of April 30, we have significant resources for being on offense and defense. If we jump to page 17, I can go through our fair value balance sheet. As I mentioned earlier on the call, I mean, we estimate that the fair value of our balance sheet equity is materially higher than our book value. The explanations and discussion of fair value are included in Table eight in the MD&A section of our 10-Q. We invest in mortgage loans at discounts to UPB based on our manager's analytics. Our servicer works with borrowers and helps get loans back on track. When they become regular paying loans, they become significantly more valuable. Our GAAP balance sheet shows our mortgage loans at the lower of amortized cost or market. Based on current performing loan market prices, we estimate that fair value is approximately $111 million higher than fully diluted book value. Our estimate of fair value, fully diluted book value per share at March 31 is over $20 per share for GAAP book value of $16.18. With that, I would like to open it up to any questions that anybody might have. Thank you. At this time, I would like to remind everyone, in order to ask a question, press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. Again, that is star then the number one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. We have our first question coming from the line of Kevin Barker with Piper Sandler. Your line is open. Good afternoon, Larry. How you doing? Hi, Kevin. How are you? Good. You took another sizable negative provision today, I mean, this quarter. It seems, obviously, with home prices rising, prepayments high, that provision might sustain itself, or at least you're in very strong credit. Could you just give us a little bit of additional color on the outlook for the provision expense and then your expectations, just in general, for credit within the book? Sure. Since we buy loans at discounts. Let's say we buy a loan at a $90 price. In that $90, we have an expectation for how much of $90 or higher we're going to collect. To the extent we think it's only going to be 95% collectible, we will effectively have a five-point discount and then a five-point allowance, except we didn't pay for the allowance. If the loan prepays, we pick up the five points we expected plus the five points we didn't expect. Plus any additional interest or fees or arrearage, things like that. Because we buy loans at discounts, HPA has made it so that what we've actually been receiving in payoffs is materially higher than what we would have expected and hadn't been part of our amortization of discount in prior quarters because we didn't expect to receive it. Home price appreciation has made considerably more of our loan total UPB and arrearage collectible than previously, we're taking it through income to the extent we've actually received it as opposed to we proposed to receive it. The $5.5 million in this quarter that we took through interest income and the $8 million last quarter, that's from money actually received that we did not expect to receive from the loans that made those payments. We would expect that to continue as we've seen so far in April and early May, and into Q2. The pace of that does to some extent depend on stability of home prices. Home prices have gone up so much that we don't expect it to decelerate in any material way until there's almost like a burnout effect of people. There's just no one who wants to sell their home anymore. We have seen certain triggers. We've spent a lot of time looking into the weeds analytics of which loans are prepaying and what are the characteristics of them. We have seen certain, what I'll call behavioral economics 101 turning points that we've noticed in the analytics that once loans hit certain amounts of absolute equity, when they're delinquent, they prepay on average. We've seen the similar in reperformance that once loans go from having little equity up to more equity over a certain threshold, they're much more likely to reperform as well, as a result of home price appreciation. To the extent that you think there's more HPA coming, these numbers will keep steady and perhaps increase. If you think home price appreciation just stays where it is, we would think that these numbers will be pretty level for a while. Okay. That was a very long answer. Sorry. That was very thorough. I appreciate it. On another topic, the RPL purchase that you announced, the nearly $800 million. It's a very large transaction for you guys. Yes. Could you just detail how much of the joint venture you're owning? Sure. And also- Sure. What's the impact going to look like here on the income statement and balance sheet, just given the joint ventures are a little bit different than how we look at the loans that are on balance sheet? Any color you can provide there would be really helpful. Sure. In that $800 million, there's a number of different purchases. The largest is about $770 million, which is a joint venture. We will be 12.6% of that joint venture, so just under $100 million, with two other parties. It's a single seller. The expectation is that will close in mid to late June. We won't receive material income from it this quarter, but certainly will beginning in Q3. The other purchases of RPLs are usually directly ours. We also have another $100 million of NPLs that we're purchasing with one of our institutional partners in a joint venture as well, and we'll be 20% of that joint venture. Okay. When we think about Those will show up. There are $100 million. Right. Coming on balance sheet. I'm sorry. Yeah. Correct. Those will show up in securities and beneficial interests, not in loans. Even though we effectively own loans, we will own them in a joint venture structure, so they'll show up in securities and beneficial interests. Okay. About $30 million or $40 million of it will show up in loans of that total $900 million, call, $800 + $100. Okay. What's your expected impact from net interest income from. We would expect net interest incomes to increase pretty dramatically since we have plenty of cash on hand that we can fund it without having any material interest expense. It will be a significant increase in revenue, interest revenue, without any material increase in interest expense. Given there's a limited discount to UPB, can you size up the weighted average loan? Yeah. These are classic loans that we buy where they're relatively sloppier-paying loans. If you look at the RPLs, the purchase price is 54% of property value. The average equity in the homes is about $140,000 per home. The average arrears is a little less than six months. As a result, including advances that we don't have to pay for and arrears that we don't have to pay for, the owing balance is actually approximately 103 or 103 and a quarter, not 100. We're paying 97 and a half of 100, but really only 95% of the owing amount. The coupon is above 4%, because of the amount of equity, we would expect that these loans to be shorter duration than they otherwise would have been, say, two years ago. Okay. All right. That's very helpful. Thank you. We have our next question coming from the line of Eric Hagen with BTIG. Your line is open. Hey, thanks. I've got a couple. Do you have an expectation or even just a ballpark of how much taxable income you might generate going forward as a result of the faster paydowns and lower interest expense you discussed? Do you see it creating a situation where you need to distribute a special dividend at the end of the year? The second question is, on the package of RPLs that you were just talking about, maybe I could ask it in a more kind of clear fashion. I mean, what's the return on equity that you expect from that transaction? Because of the amount of liquidity we have, we don't need to finance it in the beginning. The return on equity will be lower because it'll be delevered. Once we finance it, we would expect that return on equity to be somewhere low to mid-teens. Got it. Okay. From a taxable income perspective, you see our board increased our dividend from $0.17 - $0.19 a quarter. They did that because of their expectation that taxable income will continue to be relatively stable or rising. They tend to be relatively conservative with quarterly dividends so that like you have in March or April of 2020, where when strange things happen, they don't want to have to reduce dividends materially. They like to have kind of a consistent, predictable dividend. My gut feel is if they start to feel a need for the special dividend, they would raise the quarterly dividend to try to make a special dividend less of a percentage of the total. They would rather have a higher regularly quarterly dividend once they get comfortable that that's a completely stable, predictable number. This is kind of the first step towards that. From a conservative position, they didn't want to increase it too rapidly, but I think they all believe that the quarterly dividend over time will need to increase. Thank you. Sure. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. Turning the call back over to the presenters for additional comments. Thank you everybody for joining our first quarter conference call for Great Ajax Corp. Feel free to reach out if you have questions. Thanks again for attending and have a good Thursday night. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.