Good morning. Welcome to Sage Therapeutics' third quarter 2021 financial results conference call. Currently, all participants are in a listen-only mode. This call is being webcast live on the Investors and Media section of Sage's website at sagerx.com. This call is the property of Sage Therapeutics, and recording, reproduction or transmission of this call without the express written consent of Sage Therapeutics is strictly prohibited. Please note that this call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce Helen Rubinstein, Investor Relations at Sage. Good morning, and thank you for joining Sage Therapeutics' third quarter 2021 financial results conference call. Before we begin, I encourage everyone to go to the Investors and Media section of our website at sagerx.com, where you can find the press release related to today's call, as well as the slides that contain supplemental details. I'd like to point out that we will be making forward-looking statements, which are based on our current expectations and beliefs. These statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, and our actual results may differ materially. Please consult the risk factors discussed in today's press release and in our SEC filings for additional details. We will begin the call with prepared remarks by Barry Greene, our Chief Executive Officer, who will provide an overview of accomplishments during the quarter and some general context. We will also be joined by Jim Doherty, our Chief Development Officer, who will review recent development progress across our programs, and Kimi Iguchi, our Chief Financial Officer, who will review financial results from the quarter. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Barry. Thanks, Helen, and thank you everyone for joining us this morning. I'll begin the call by reviewing our recent corporate and clinical progress before turning the call to Jim to provide commentary on our clinical expectations for the remainder of 2021. Then Kimi will provide an update on our financials. This year and quarter have been marked by significant progress for Sage. We recently announced that following a pre-NDA meeting with the FDA, we and Biogen plan to submit an NDA for zuranolone in MDD in the second half of 2022, with an additional associated submission in PPD in the first half of 2023. We're pleased that we've reached alignment with the agency and believe we have a clear path for this submission. This brings us one step closer toward our goal of helping patients suffering from MDD and PPD. Now let me take a step back to reflect on how we got here. We met with the agency in early 2020 and designed three distinct phase III studies, two in MDD and one in PPD. The plan set in motion was for a positive study from any one of the three paths to support an NDA filing and subsequent approval since it would provide the third positive pivotal study. Based on the positive results from the WATERFALL study, we believe that we have the necessary data to submit an NDA for zuranolone, and we're delighted that our recent pre-NDA meeting with the FDA reaffirmed that belief. Now in fact, we have four positive studies, MDD-201B, ROBIN, WATERFALL, and the Shionogi phase II study. The data we have generated in clinical development to date support our belief in the overall benefit risk of zuranolone. The planned NDA will include efficacy data from MDD-201B, WATERFALL, ROBIN, and the Japanese study, as well as retreatment data from SHORELINE, data from the ongoing pharmacology studies in CORAL, and safety from the entirety of the program. Importantly, the CORAL study is an adjunctive use study designed to demonstrate the benefits of zuranolone when co-initiated with a standard antidepressant treatment or ADT. Given the efficacy data we already have in hand to support the planned NDA filing and to align the CORAL study primary endpoint with the goal of the study, we announced today that the primary endpoint, HAM-D17 change from baseline, will be measured at day three. This change is designed to allow us to demonstrate the rapid reduction of depressive symptoms. We'll also assess the impact of zuranolone during the dosing period as well as its safety profile. We believe if successful, these data may be important to inform potential real-world use if zuranolone is approved. We do not believe CORAL efficacy data will be required for the MDD filing pathway. CORAL data will, however, contribute to the overall safety database regardless of the outcome of the primary endpoint. We've had a highly productive and transparent relationship with the agency and look forward to continuing to engage with them as we begin the rolling submission for zuranolone planned to commence in early 2022. We will work to ensure the totality of the LANDSCAPE and NEST programs are appropriately reflected in our planned NDA submission package and the product label, if approved. We recently also presented data from the LANDSCAPE and NEST programs at both the ECNP and annual Psych Congress that reinforce the differentiated profile of zuranolone we've seen to date in clinical development. Jim will walk you through the data we presented, but I want to take a moment to highlight that we've seen a consistent profile for zuranolone across the totality of data. I would also like to take a moment to congratulate our colleagues at Shionogi, who recently presented positive results from a phase II study of zuranolone conducted in Japan. These results further demonstrate the promise of zuranolone for people living with MDD, and we look forward to continuing our relationship with them. As you can see from the totality of data collected across the LANDSCAPE and NEST program to date, zuranolone has consistently demonstrated rapid and sustained reductions in depressive symptoms and a well-tolerated safety profile without the adverse events that are often associated with discontinuation of standard of care ADTs. We believe that we are well-positioned to be able to provide this important treatment to patients suffering from MDD and PPD, if approved. To this end, we are actively engaging in scientific exchange with KOLs and are pleased that many of them recognize both the value demonstrated across the zuranolone clinical data package, as well as the potential for use in specific patient types they see in clinical practice. As we look to the next year, we anticipate building on this work. By remaining steadfast in our commitment to put MDD and PPD patients first in our zuranolone development efforts, assembling the right team at the right time to execute on our planned NDA filing, and reinvesting our learnings from zuranolone across our pipeline, we believe we are poised to make a difference for people with depression and other brain health disorders. We look forward to continuing to provide updates on zuranolone as we pursue the initial NDA filing submission for MDD. Now turning to our neurology franchise led by SAGE-324, which is developed in-house and is part of our collaboration with Biogen. SAGE-324 is currently being evaluated as a potential treatment for patients suffering from essential tremor and other neurological disorders, including epileptiform disorders and Parkinson's disease. We believe that the pharmacologic characteristics of SAGE-324 are well-suited to address the significant unmet need in patients suffering from essential tremor and other neurological diseases. Following the positive results from the KINETIC study, we're preparing to initiate a phase II dose-ranging study expected to commence later this year. The goal will be to optimize the dose and frequency with a good tolerability profile and a dosing schedule to maintain plasma concentrations that translate into sustained tremor symptom control. We look forward to providing updates on this study as we are able. Turning to our neural franchise, where we are evaluating SAGE-718, our wholly owned first-in-class NMDA receptor PAM, as a potential oral therapy for cognitive disorders associated with NMDA receptor dysfunction. This quarter, SAGE-718 received Fast Track designation for development as a potential treatment for Huntington's disease from the FDA. As a reminder, we saw promising early data in a phase I study of SAGE-718 in people with early Huntington's disease last year. We're on track with our plan to initiate a randomized placebo-controlled phase II study with SAGE-718 in early to moderate Huntington's disease this year. This study, if positive, will bring us one step closer to pursuing an initial regulatory indication for SAGE-718. I'm also pleased to announce that we plan to initiate a second randomized placebo phase II study with SAGE-718 in 2022. This will be in patients with Parkinson's disease cognitive dysfunction. We believe this study will meaningfully contribute to our understanding of SAGE-718 as we seek to provide a safe and efficacious treatment for patients suffering from this disorder. Lastly, SAGE-718 is also being evaluated in an ongoing LUMINARY study as a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease cognitive dysfunction. Today, we announced the study is fully enrolled, and we are on track to announce top-line data from the study before the end of this year. As you can see, we've realized great progress across our brain health franchises so far this year. I'm also pleased to share progress on key corporate updates on today's call. This quarter, we are happy to welcome Chris Benecchi, Chief Commercial Officer to Sage, and announce that Vanessa Procter has been elevated to serve as Head of External Affairs and joined our executive leadership team. Additionally, Jim Doherty, on the call with me, has assumed the role of Chief Development Officer. We've also elevated Mike Quirk to Senior Vice President, Discovery and Research, where he will continue to build our research capabilities. As we expand and accelerate our efforts across our organization, and with so much to look forward to in the balance of 2021 and next year, I'm confident that their contributions across our organization will be instrumental to our collective progress toward becoming leaders in brain health. Today, we're also announcing the departure of Steve Kanes, Sage's Chief Medical Officer. It's been Steve's goal since I met him to seek a CEO role, and he's fulfilling that today and will become CEO at a private biotech company. I'm thrilled for Steve in his new role. Steve has made significant contributions to Sage over the past 8.5 years. We extend our thanks for his leadership in advancing our brain health programs and wish him success in his future endeavors. Steve has contributed to establishing Sage as a leader in brain health and progressing programs across our pipeline. We're highly confident in the strong team that we have to continue to execute on our priorities. I invite Steve to say a few words. Steve? Thanks, Barry. As I reflect on my time at Sage, I'm proud of all that we've accomplished. In my eight and a half years here, I've had the opportunity to develop and launch Zulresso, establish and grow our development organization, advance the pipeline, and bring zuranolone through a robust clinical development program. It's long been my aspiration to lead a company, and I made the decision that now is the right time to pursue a CEO role. I couldn't be leaving Sage in a better position. We've seen great data with zuranolone, believe we have a clear path to filing an NDA, and I'm very confident that in this team's ability to take this program forward. I appreciate the support and encouragement from Barry and the leadership team, and I look forward to watching Sage's continued success. I know that I leave Sage in great hands and in extraordinary shape with a clear path towards Sage's second drug to market. Thanks, Steve. In closing, I'm highly confident that our accomplishments across our brain health franchises in the third quarter will translate into continued success as we execute on our strategic goals. I believe we are primed to enter the next phase of Sage's journey to becoming the leader in brain health. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Jim to detail our clinical accomplishments and expectations for the balance of 2021. Jim? Thanks, Barry, and good morning, everyone. In 2021, we have made important advancements across our three brain health franchises, including our early-stage programs. I am pleased to highlight our next steps across each, starting with the three ongoing phase III studies in our zuranolone program, CORAL, SHORELINE, and SKYLARK. As a reminder, CORAL is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zuranolone 50 mg when co-initiated with newly open-label SSRIs in patients with MDD. We also announced today that the primary endpoint in the CORAL study, change from baseline on the HAM-D17, will be measured at day three. We believe this update is in line with the goal of the study to demonstrate the rapid onset of zuranolone, and we will also assess the benefits throughout the treatment period and expect to see a consistent, well-tolerated safety profile. Additionally, as we continue to increase our focus on the potential commercial launch of zuranolone, we believe that including a trial with a day three primary endpoint may be a useful complement to the broad clinical package for zuranolone. The study is now closed to screening, and top-line results are expected in early 2022. Of note, the enrollment for the CORAL study is anticipated to be within the expected range allowed by the study protocol. The target enrollment is 424, and we expect the study to enroll about that number of patients or perhaps slightly higher. The SHORELINE study is a naturalistic open label safety and tolerability study to investigate as needed repeat treatment with zuranolone over a one-year period in patients with MDD. We believe this study will provide physicians with important information on how zuranolone may be used to treat people with MDD if approved. We are on track with our plan to report a top-line data cut from the 50 mg one-year cohort in SHORELINE later this year. Moving forward, enrollment in the study will continue following our prior announcement that we expanded the target enrollment to 500 patients. We are offering patients from the CORAL study the ability to roll over into the SHORELINE study following their completion of the CORAL study. The other ongoing phase III study of zuranolone is the SKYLARK study in PPD, which we expect to read out in mid-2022. Our vision for the zuranolone program is to offer a new way of thinking about the treatment of depression, and we recognize that that means providing a robust data package to drive that change. This is a program with seven major clinical studies and more than 4,000 patients treated. MDD is a large market with an estimated 19 million sufferers every year. The size of both the MDD population and our program necessitate a significant filing package. As such, we're planning to assemble a package that meets the requirements of the FDA for a submission of this size and provides information on how zuranolone might be used in the real world if approved. Let me lay out the filing strategy. We plan to begin the rolling submission in early 2022 with the CMC and non-clinical modules submitted first. The clinical module will likely be the last module submitted for this filing, expected to occur in the second half of 2022. This timing reflects five-six months after the last component of the clinical module is anticipated to be complete, during which time the team will focus on integrating the data package across studies to tell the most complete clinical story for zuranolone. Additionally, in October, we presented data at the 34th European College of Neuropsychopharmacology or ECNP Congress that further supports the differentiated profile seen to date with zuranolone in clinical development, including a rapid and sustained reduction in depressive symptoms and a unique and well-tolerated safety profile. Further, in a pooled analysis from the LANDSCAPE and NEST programs, zuranolone treatment has led to rapid and sustained improvement in quality of life and overall health at day 15. This improvement continued to increase through day 42 as measured by the SF-36v2, a patient self-reported measure of general health. Dr. Anita Clayton, Chair of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences at the University of Virginia School of Medicine and Principal Investigator of the Waterfall study, recently presented these data in an encore presentation that is available via the investor section of our website. If you haven't seen her presentation yet, I recommend watching it. We also presented data at the 34th Psych Congress showing that zuranolone demonstrated rapid improvements across HAM-D17 subscales measuring the core symptoms of depression as well as symptoms of anxiety in the Waterfall study. These findings are consistent with the totality of data from the Landscape and Nest programs. We also presented analyses demonstrating that zuranolone treatment led to rapid improvements in functional impairment and improvements in depressive symptoms across patient populations such as age, gender, and body mass index at day 15, regardless of whether patients were receiving zuranolone as monotherapy or concomitantly with a standard of care antidepressant. We're proud of the progress we've made with zuranolone throughout 2021 and excited by the profile we've seen across the totality of the development program. We believe zuranolone has the potential to offer a different treatment approach that may enable patients to experience reduction in depressive symptoms quickly and maintain longer treatment-free intervals without burdensome side effects. Now I'd like to detail the advancements made in our neurology franchise led by SAGE-324, a next generation positive allosteric modulator of GABA A receptors which we believe holds significant potential in treatment of neurological conditions like essential tremor. As a reminder, we reported positive data from the KINETIC study earlier this year that showed improvements in upper limb tremor scores measured by the TETRAS performance subscale item 4 upper limb tremor score, and importantly, demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between TETRAS scores and activities of daily living observed at every time point. This is an important finding that demonstrates that the reductions in tremors seen with SAGE-324 in the study translated to meaningful effects for patients. Based in part on these results, we are on track to initiate a placebo-controlled phase II dose ranging study in SAGE-324 for ET to optimize the dose and frequency planned to commence in late 2021. In collaboration with Biogen, we look forward to continuing the development of SAGE-324. We remain confident that our planned phase II study will generate a dose and frequency for further development to advance our goal of establishing an optimal benefit-risk profile. Moving to the development underway in our neurology franchise, we're excited about the future prospects of SAGE-689, a potent product candidate that has demonstrated rapid absorption, good bioavailability, and solid formulation flexibility with potential to treat therapeutic areas that suffer from a lack of treatment options, including acute agitation, mania, or even migraine. We announced last quarter that we dosed the first patient in the phase I program for SAGE-689 and remain on track to complete the phase I SAD study in late 2021. Additionally, I'm also pleased to share that IND-enabling preclinical work is continuing for SAGE-319, an oral extrasynaptic GABAA receptor preferring PAM. The advancements of the SAGE-689 and SAGE-319 programs represent continued data-driven expansion and growth of our Sage-developed, wholly owned neurology pipeline. Turning to our neuropsychiatric franchise, we are making important strides in developing SAGE-718, our NMDA receptor PAM that is a potential oral therapy for disorders where impairment of cognition is one of the main drivers of disability. The Fast Track designation recently granted to SAGE-718 as a potential treatment for Huntington's disease accelerates our developmental efforts to bring this therapy to patients. In a phase I study of patients with early HD, treatment with SAGE-718 was associated with robust improvements in tests of cognitive performance, such as the Stroop test that began on day eight and were maintained through day 14, the end of the treatment period. We are on track with our plan to initiate a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of SAGE-718 in Huntington's disease later this year. We also previously reported exciting data in the first part of our open-label phase IIa trial for SAGE-718, known as the PARADIGM study, evaluating patients with mild cognitive impairment due to Parkinson's disease. The data demonstrate that SAGE-718 had a positive impact on multiple domains of cognition, including executive function and learning and memory, while leaving domains altering simple attention or reaction time unaffected. SAGE-718 has been well-tolerated in studies to date. As Barry mentioned, we are excited to announce our plans to launch a phase II placebo-controlled study in Parkinson's disease cognitive impairment, which we expect to begin in 2022. Lastly, the LUMINARY study with SAGE-718 in patients with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and mild dementia is fully enrolled, and we look forward to reporting top-line data expected later this year. In further developing our neuropsychiatry franchise, we are making progress evaluating SAGE-904, an NMDA receptor PAM product candidate as a potential oral therapy for other disorders associated with NMDA hypofunction. We remain on track to complete the SAD study in late 2021, and the MAD study is ongoing. Additionally, our other earlier stage neuropsychiatry program, SAGE-421, an oral NMDA PAM being evaluated for potential use in neurodevelopmental disorders and cognitive recovery and rehabilitation, is making good progress, and we look forward to providing updates on this program when they become available. I'm excited about the future development opportunities for our earlier stage product candidates and the advancement of our later stage product candidates with the ultimate goal of regulatory approval and commercialization. We are continuing to expand and accelerate potential indications for our wholly owned programs, and I believe we have the potential to make a difference for people living with brain health disorders as well as their families, caregivers, and communities. Now, I'll turn the call over to Kimi for a review of our financials. Kimi? Thanks, Jim. The third quarter was a critical time for our company's growth and development. In reflecting on the tremendous progress made throughout 2021, I'm proud of the work our team has accomplished and believe we're well positioned to execute on our clinical and business priorities. Our strong balance sheet gives us the flexibility to continue to invest in our robust pipeline, and we are focusing on building the right team to support our expected growth now and into the future. I'd like to start by highlighting our third quarter financials and then provide some remarks on our financial guidance. We recorded $1.4 million in net revenue in the third quarter from the sale of Zulresso. That compares to $1.6 million of net revenue from the sales of Zulresso for the same period in 2020. We remain committed to moms, their families, and all those impacted by PPD. Our targeted commercial efforts, including an integrated approach to engaging key stakeholders, are aimed to help moms with PPD. Research and development expenses were $83.5 million in the third quarter. That was compared to $74.1 million for the same period of 2020. The increase in R&D expense reflects the planned acceleration expansion of our wholly owned pipeline, including advancement of SAGE-718, SAGE-689, and SAGE-904, as well as manufacturing-related activities for zuranolone. The increase also reflects the recognition of a one-time stock-based compensation milestone. These increases are partially offset by a reimbursement from our collaboration with Biogen for zuranolone and SAGE-324. Selling, general, and administration expenses were $48.7 million in the third quarter compared to $35.1 million for the same period of 2020. The increase in SG&A expense reflects an increase in hiring of personnel and activities related to launch readiness to support a potential product launch. Similar to R&D, the increase also reflects recognition of a one-time stock-based compensation milestone and is partially offset by a reimbursement from our collaboration with Biogen for zuranolone and SAGE-324. We reported a net loss of $130.2 million for the third quarter, which included $34 million of non-cash stock-based compensation. That was compared to a net loss of $105.7 million, including $20 million of non-cash stock-based compensation for the comparable period of 2020. Now, I'd like to move to our financial guidance. Based on our current financial outlook and projections, our financial guidance remains unchanged. We expect to have a cash balance of more than $1.7 billion at the end of 2021. As a reminder, we do not expect to receive any milestone payments from collaborations for the remainder of 2021. We continue to invest thoughtfully and are well positioned to achieve long-term success across our organization as we seek to develop meaningful treatments for the patients who inspire our work. I'll now turn it over to Helen to handle Q&A with the operator. Helen? Thanks, Kimi. Before I turn it over to the operator, I'll ask that you limit yourself to one question. If you have an additional question, feel free to return to the queue. Now, I'll turn it over to the operator to handle Q&A. Operator? As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one on your telephone. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Ritu Baral from Cowen. Your line is now open. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question. I did want to ask first about the CORAL primary endpoint change. I guess first, very quickly, was that FDA driven or Sage driven? How does it reflect on your anticipated active control change at day three that you're anticipating? Are you anticipating that sort of 6.7- 6.8 change that you saw in MOUNTAIN and WATERFALL since SSRIs really won't have kicked in? Thanks. Hey, Ritu. Thanks for the question. That's a great one. You know, as we shared, we had a very successful pre-NDA meeting that confirmed the NDA filing package with efficacy data from MDD-201B, WATERFALL, ROBIN, and the Japanese phase II study, as well as retreatment data from SHORELINE. We also anticipate the ongoing pharmacology studies and, as you mentioned, CORAL, as well as safety from the entire program. With that clarity in hand, we sought overall feedback on the CORAL study statistical analysis plan from the agency. After that feedback, we selected the phase III or the day three endpoint as the key primary endpoint, really to get back to the original idea of the CORAL study, which is to demonstrate kind of the rapid relief of depressive symptoms early in clinical trials. As you noted, current antidepressants don't kick in for 48 weeks, if ever. This represents sort of rapid relief for the patient. Since we already had the efficacy data in hand for filing, it allowed us now to move the primary endpoint to CORAL-2 to Day three. Just kind of the second part of your question, you're right. We don't expect any efficacy benefits from the active arm of antidepressants because we know through millions of patients dosed in literature over the last 30 years that they take a while to kick in. Great. Thanks for taking the question. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Cory Kasimov from JP Morgan. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning. This is Thomas on for Cory. Thanks for taking the question. I guess maybe just another one on the CORAL update here. I think the update makes sense, and obviously you guys have said that you have all the efficacy data you need to file. But just curious how important you think it will be for physicians to see a separation from placebo at later time points in this study, particularly as we think about the effects of SSRIs potentially kicking in over time? Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Thomas, and please send our best to Cory. You know, I think reflecting, you're right. We believe after the pre-NDA meeting that we have the package to file, so it was important for us to have Day Three reflect that rapid onset. The way I think physicians will think about zuranolone is in the totality of data. It's not any individual study, it's the 4,000 patients and the consistent profile, where, as you know, we've seen rapid relief of depressive symptoms, anxiety, no change to sleep patterns, in fact, potential benefit to sleep patterns. We really think about the totality of the data across the dosing period and extended period. You know, I'll highlight that we saw in the Japanese study, in fact, which followed patients out to Day 56, that patients continued to improve out to Day 56, and you saw sort of a kick up in the placebo patients, probably reflecting kind of return to baseline, which is what we'd expect in the real world. We need to reflect the SHORELINE data, which at 30 mg, as you remember, showed that 70% of patients only needed one or two two-week treatments in the course of a full year. When we think about how physicians will think about the data, it's the totality of data and not any individual study. Got it. Makes sense. Thanks. Thanks, Thomas. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Paul Matteis from Stifel. Your line is now open. Great. Thanks so much for taking my questions. I have one really quick one and then one that's a little bit more qualitative. Just on a quick one, can you confirm what the final sample size of CORAL ended up being and whether or not you over enrolled? Second, in your more recent FDA conversations, Barry, have you talked at all about how these durability time points will be interpreted from a regulatory perspective? I know there's the Zulresso AdCom precedent, but because, you know, postpartum depression is an acute indication and MDD has more chronicity to it, just kind of curious if you've got confirmation that statistical significance at these later time points isn't really a hurdle? Thanks so much. Hey, Paul. Thanks for the questions. Let me start and then turn it over to Jim. I'll start with the second part of your question, then Jim can talk more about that part as well as the CORAL numbers. I guess the quick answer is statistical significance at the later time point is not required. The agency and what physicians look for is consistent and durable impact without a rapid return to baseline. As we've already talked about across 4,000 patient subjects dosed, we've seen rapid benefit at Day three with continued benefit out to Day 42, and again, in SHORELINE, even longer term feedback. What you worry about, and we don't worry about this with zuranolone, but other kinds of medicines, is that someone gets better quickly, but after they stop the drug, they quickly return to baseline. We see nothing like that with the zuranolone across any of the trials. Jim, you wanna add more color and then talk about the CORAL numbers? Yeah, of course, Barry. I would say, as Barry mentioned earlier, it's really about the totality of the data, Paul. The CORAL study adds to that story that we're telling for zuranolone with 201B, ROBIN, WATERFALL, the Shionogi study, the SHORELINE study. I think that where the CORAL study adds is in explaining that element of, you know, the co-initiation of zuranolone with a standard antidepressant. Really, certainly from an efficacy point of view, but I think also perhaps as importantly from a tolerability point of view, to understand, you know, what do we see from a tolerability perspective with the combination. To your question around the size for CORAL, as I said earlier, the target for CORAL, as you know, is 424. I think that we are... The study is closed for screening. As I said, we expect to come in around that number with perhaps a little bit enrolled above it since the study ran a little bit longer than originally intended. We expect to be in the range of that 424. Great. Thank you. Thanks, Paul. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Yasmeen Rahimi from Piper Sandler. Your line is now open. Hi, team. Steve, you'll be greatly missed, and thank you for all your entire contribution. I have a quick question. I guess what I'm trying to make a sense of is, I mean, Day three placebo responses tend to be significantly lower than Day 15 in the HAM-D17 score. A high probability to hit stat sig and see a separation. Why not use this data and file from day three into your filing? I guess what I'm trying to figure out is, like, we knew all along that day three will show a statistical separation. Why not use this data for filing? Why do you guys keep saying that we shouldn't, we don't need it? B, why change it so close to rolling NDA? That would be helpful. Thank you for taking my questions. Yeah. Thanks for the question. Let me just sort of take a step back, and I commented this in my prepared remarks on the call. I'll remind you that in 2020, our team sat down with the agency following a number of phase III studies, one, recognizing that MDD was a major unmet need, and in fact, a growing unmet need. We and the agency and others appreciated that we needed something in addition to the currently approved antidepressants where we haven't seen a change in benefit-risk in a long time, and designed the LANDSCAPE and NEST programs, two MDD studies and one PPD study. We highlighted, and this is going back to consistent with our guidance in January, that we needed one more positive study to have the package to file. We've got that and more. We had the Japanese positive study as well. We sat down with the agency in our pre-NDA meeting and confirmed that that data package was sufficient for filing and that another phase III was not required. There was a dilemma in front of us, as we highlighted. We had two ongoing phase III studies. We had what I thought was a very good open strategic discussion with the agency, which said, "Look, CORAL's coming up. Let's file for MDD. We're going to include CORAL in the filing, but the efficacy data is not necessarily required to be positive to file." The change to day three will benefit us if in fact day three is positive and we see benefit over the treatment course. Those data will be incredibly important to guide our medical affairs force, our sales force in educating physicians about the appropriate use of zuranolone, including the totality of data. With another positive study, we will see benefit in terms of educating physicians. I think as you heard Anita Clayton say in her ENCORE presentation with ECNP, you know, who wouldn't want to get better faster? This will allow us to really lean in on those kind of data. Thanks, Barry. Thanks, Yas. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ami Fadia from Needham. Your line is now open. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Wanted to switch gears to 324. With the phase II study planned, are you in a position to talk about, you know, what type of doses or frequency you may be evaluating in that study, to, you know, find kind of a finer trade-off between efficacy and safety? Then, just a quick follow-up on the spending for the quarter. You know, is the R&D spending this quarter reflective of the run rate that we should expect going forward? Thanks. Amy, thanks for the question and for broadening the dialogue to the rest of our pipeline. I'm gonna ask Jim to comment on SAGE-324, and then Kimi to talk about our financials. Jim? Yeah. Thanks, Barry. The results from the KINETIC study, the phase IIa study we ran with 324, gave us clear evidence for activity of 324 in treating essential tremor, but along the way with some effects on somnolence. We knew at the time that 60 mg once daily dosing was at the top of the range that we wanted to test for essential tremor based on our earlier work, open-label and phase I, as well as the earlier work that we had done in essential tremor with both Zulresso and zuranolone. It really helps clarify the strategy for the IIb study. It will be a dose-ranging study looking at multiple doses with 60 mg being the top dose in that study. Really, the goal is to identify an appropriate balance between efficacy and tolerability, pretty much a standard activity for a phase IIb study. We've thought a lot about things like the PK profile of 324. As you know, the expressed intent for 324 was to produce a molecule with a relatively long half-life and therefore, a well-suited compound for chronic dosing. All of those considerations go into the study design for the phase IIb study, which again, we intend to initiate before the end of the year. Ami, the question on the R&D expenses for the quarter, you did see some increases in the quarter. A couple things that I would like to point out that we did have a one-time stock-based compensation cost that was reflected in the quarter, and that was about $13 million. Some of that was included in the R&D expenses. What I will say is that we've always talked about the acceleration and expansion of the pipeline. That's reflected in what you see in the quarter for our operating expenses. The other thing I'll remind you is, of course, we have the cost-sharing arrangement with Biogen, so they are reimbursing us for 50% of the cost for the development and commercialization for zuranolone and SAGE-324 in the U.S. We do expect to see some additional increases in the R&D expenses as we continue to accelerate and expand the pipeline. Got it. Can I just ask, was the full $13 million included in R&D, or what portion of it was in R&D? Thanks. Just a portion of that was in R&D, and I'm sorry the number's escaping me right now, but I think about it half and half maybe. Got it. Thank you. Thanks, Sami. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Salveen Richter from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open. Hey, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. This is Andrea on for Salveen. Sorry, Barry, to go back to zuranolone. Just curious how your KOL conversations have evolved over the development course. As you near potential launch, are you hearing any points of pushback or concern about how the drug would eventually be used in the treatment paradigm? Thanks, Andrea, and no problem going back to zuranolone. I know it's on everybody's mind. With the totality of data, particularly as presented at ECNP, and that really was the first congress where an integrated data set, including patient-reported outcomes at day 15 and 42 were presented. When treating physicians saw the totality of data and reflected that even at day 42, four weeks after patients had stopped dosing, that they continued to improve and across all eight domains were statistically significantly better than placebo, I think a lot of light bulbs went off. You know, this is a new way of treating. It's not an SSRI or SNRI. It's not a chronic treatment. It's a short-term treatment where patients get better faster, and as we've evidenced in Shoreline, stay better. It's a pretty new approach from, frankly, what many of them learned in medical school for the last 50 years, which is if you diagnose someone with depression, you treat them for six months. At the end of six months, if they're fine, slowly remove drug. If not, keep them drugged, frankly, for the rest of their lives. This is a very different approach. I think, again, light bulbs are going off. The other part that treating physicians or potential treating physicians are really starting to appreciate is the safety profile. One of the things, and I think many of you who listened to Anita heard this, and I'm not quoting her exactly, but she said something like the two things she's worries about most is sexual dysfunction and weight gain for her patients, and that's why they stop taking the drug. We don't see that. We see a little bit of somnolence, which in fact in these patients is helpful, but none of the side effects that hurt adherence. Of course, it's a two-week course of treatment. We're making a lot of traction. As we continue the scientific exchange, I believe you're gonna hear more positivity by potential treating physicians in the future. Thanks, Barry. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Laura Chico from Wedbush. Your line is now open. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just one on CORAL and I guess maybe the longer term outlook. Could you speak a little bit to kind of the linkage between the day three separation and what is the read-through to remission rates, if there is any? Then kind of unrelated to zuranolone, but beyond CORAL, what are going to be the key data events that we should have in mind for 2022? Thank you. Yeah, Laura, let me start and then I can turn it over to Jim for you know, kind of key data events. You know, again, the key here is that we have four positive studies in over 3,000 patients and subjects showing the rapid relief of depressive symptoms, anxiety as early as day three and as evidenced out to day 42. When you couple that with SHORELINE showing that most patients only need one or two, two-week dose in the course of a year, we have really impressive data, you know, for the filing. Now, what's key for CORAL on day three is we know that people suffering from depression on current standard of care, if at all, take weeks to get better. What's clinically meaningful, and I think Anita hit this on the call, is that you want people to get better quickly. Who wouldn't? Who wants to suffer for four-six weeks to see if I can work through my weight gain, work through my sexual dysfunction to see if my depression abates? Day three is incredibly clinically meaningful to patients and to physicians. This CORAL study, day three, allows us to measure that and potentially even educate on that if the study's positive in the future. We're thrilled with the change and, you know, looking forward to the CORAL results. Jim, you wanna talk about the rest of the year? Yeah. Absolutely. Thank you, Barry. For the rest of the year in 2021, as far as readouts go, we will be expecting the 50-milligram SHORELINE data for zuranolone showing up to one year of dosing. Also for the SAGE-718 program, we are expecting results from the open-label Alzheimer's disease patient population before the end of the year. Moving into 2022 for the zuranolone program, the CORAL study to read out early in 2022, the SKYLARK study to read out in mid-2022. Of course, we're expecting to submit our NDA in the second half of 2022. Great. Thank you. Man, you know, these aren't data readouts per se, Laura, but we think it's very important that we'll be initiating the Huntington's trial later this year and then soon thereafter the Parkinson's trial for SAGE-718 in cognitive dysfunction. Not a data readout, but clear progress on moving a program like SAGE-718 along. Of course, as Jim already highlighted, the start of the phase II along with Biogen for SAGE-324 in essential tremor. Looking at dose frequency, the number of doses as well as longer treatment duration will also be exciting to explain the phase II design in the future. Thanks, guys. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jay Olson from Oppenheimer. Your line is now open. Hey, guys. This is Matt on for Jay. Thanks for taking the questions. We were wondering for SAGE-324, what forms of epilepsy do you believe make the most sense to study? Separately for SAGE-718, what are you hoping to see in the LUMINARY open-label data expected soon? How could data from there inform a later stage trial in Alzheimer's? Appreciate it. Thank you. Thanks, Matt. Let me start with SAGE-718, and I'll ask Jim to comment on SAGE-324. What's really exciting about SAGE-718 that you know our first PAM in NMDA is the biologic hypothesis that started SAGE-718 has been consistent now through all preclinical, early clinical studies, as well as the early Huntington's and Parkinson's readout. While Alzheimer's is much more of a heterogeneous disease, we hope to see and expect to see the same kind of stabilization or even improvement in cognitive cognition. That means that in the test that we perform, we wanna see that patients aren't progressing and in fact stabilize or improve. We're really talking about really measuring executive function, learning and memory. The reason that's important is that in these neurodegenerative diseases, often the cognition issues they face lead to their lack of independence. The hope for SAGE-718 is that by stabilizing or in many cases improving executive function, people can carry on activities of daily living. That is, you know, make a shopping list, go to the store, buy the food I want, put it away and remember where I put it. You can imagine that being able to stay independent for years with these kind of neurodegenerative diseases is very beneficial to patients and their families. That's the kind of data that we're looking for. Jim, you wanna talk about SAGE-324? Yeah, absolutely. Matt, the question around epilepsy types for 324, I think it kinda goes back to the way we think about our programs overall and sort of trying to follow the science behind what we do. Really one of the things that is abundantly clear is that these compounds are quite good at lowering synchronized activity in the brain. What that means is it really gets right at the mechanism that triggers seizures of multiple types. There are a lot of different kinds of seizures. What we've found in all of our modeling is that irrespective of which type of seizures we're studying, the compounds have a pretty robust anti-epileptic effect. That gives us a lot of flexibility. What we'll be discussing with our collaboration partners is really which epileptic syndromes make the most sense for that very broad mechanistic ability to intervene. Okay, got it. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thanks, Matt. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Sumant Kulkarni from Canaccord. Your line is now open. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. What do you expect to see in terms of potential dose dependence for the 50 mg cohort versus 30 mgs in the upcoming Shoreline data? What would that mean for perhaps keeping things relatively simple in the real world for regulators, prescribers, and patients by filing only the 50 mg dose for your NDA? Thanks, Sumant. Thanks for the question. In terms of Shoreline, I'll remind you that in the 30 milligram readout and the preliminary 50 milligram readout, we saw what we believe were pretty impressive data. The 30 milligram, we saw 70% response rate, and then same number, 7% of patients required only one or two, two-week doses in the course of a year. The 50 milligram preliminary readout, we saw an 80% response rate, just slightly better. We're hoping that I believe at the end of the year, we'll see consistent data with that. If you step back and think about it, someone needing only one, two or even three two-week courses is certainly a major step up from a chronic therapy they have to take every day with the kind of side effects that we're talking about. In terms of filing, it's pretty common with many medicines, many antidepressants to have multiple doses in the filing. Of course, we've got to work through the agency, but it's our belief set that in addition to the 50 milligram, we perhaps will have the 30 milligram available as well for flexibility and optionality for those patients or physicians who believe their patients might- Got it. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Yatin Suneja from Guggenheim Partners. Your line is now open. Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my question. I mean, again, it's a question on CORAL, and we understand the change that you are making. We actually wrote about it in July. Trying to get a sense, you know, if you can talk about what differences do you see from commercial standpoint by getting this acute onset on the label. And, in terms of, you know, like what led you or just trying to get a sense of what led to the realization that the shorter endpoint is needed. Is it just The Waterfall study, or was there an active engagement from the regulator that led you to decide, okay, let's change it? Yeah, yeah. Team, thank you for the question. Let me again sort of remind you and everybody that when we set out the year, we set in motion the LANDSCAPE and NEST programs with two MDD and one PPD study. What we highlighted is that if one of these studies we needed to be positive for a filing package of the agency. At WATERFALL, you highlighted was in fact positive. We were thrilled with that. During our pre-meeting with the agency, we confirmed what the agency had guided before, which was that that was the study required for a filing package. With the filing package in hand, we and in consultation with the agency, we set forth to use CORAL for what it's intended to do, and it's asking a different question. The data we have to date shows the rapid and sustained effect of zuranolone as a monotherapy and on top of a stable antidepressant. What we're doing with CORAL is we're concomitantly giving zuranolone with an antidepressant for the first time. That's a different question that we're asking, and we believe that the rapid relief of zuranolone combined with an antidepressant, and that question, is very important. The rapid relief would be new. We know that current antidepressants takes four-eight weeks, if ever, to kick in. Getting somebody better fast, it's certainly very important for that patient and their treating physician. We know through the totality of data that when people respond quickly, that leads to a very beneficial and often sustained response. We think it's very important data in the totality of the data we already have. Got it. This is one clarification question. On the day three endpoint, how does it get reflected into the label at some point, right? Will it just be in the, you know, clinical study section? How you can market it? Will you be able to market it? Yeah, thank you for that. It's too early to talk about specifics of the label. Of course, you know, we'd like to see a positive study. I think what's important here is it gives us data to inform the marketplace about potential uses of zuranolone, and that's very important. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Akash Tewari from Jefferies. Your line is now open. Thanks so much. So you mentioned you're gonna include the Shionogi study in your package to the FDA. Is that mostly for safety and not efficacy, considering there was no meaningful separation between the 20 and 30 mg doses in that trial? And how do you think that impacts the agency's thinking on updosing to the 50 mg dose? Additionally, just looking at 217 for PPD, what do you think is kind of you know, the long-term opportunity for 217 in PPD? Could this be a billion-dollar indication over time? And do you feel like 217 could avoid a box warning around excessive sedation for that indication? Thank you. Yeah, Akash, I think many questions in there. Let me get to a couple of them. PPD. We think PPD could be a very meaningful indication. You know, one in eight moms suffer from depression. It's highly underdiagnosed. Having something that a mom takes for two weeks and gets better faster, I think would be very important. If you think about the number of births, one in eight moms certainly leads to a very large potential indication. Jim, you wanna take the next one? Yeah. Akash, your question about the Shionogi trial. We would anticipate using the Shionogi trial both for safety but also importantly for efficacy. What we see in that trial is a significant effect of the drug separating from placebo in both dosing arms. We also see a similar profile to what we've seen in all of our other studies, that rapid improvement in symptoms occurring as early as the first measured time point, as well as the sustained benefit that's lasting out through the end of the treatment period at day 57 in the case of the Shionogi study. Yeah. I would only add, Akash, that if you think about the study out of Japan, there was a very meaningful difference between both drug arms and placebo that was sustained out to the later time points, which is very impressive. This is the first study that we've seen that's a pure placebo study. All the other studies we've done have both monotherapy and background antidepressant therapy. This really represents a true benefit for zuranolone in a patient population. Very clean, very well-run study. We don't think the fact that the study showed benefit in 20 and 30 impacts the opportunity that we've seen in 50 at all. As Jim said, it will be very important from an efficacy and safety perspective. Just lastly, on excessive sedation, do you think you'd be able to avoid that box warning for 217? Thanks. Yeah. Again, it's too early to talk about the specifics of the label, but we don't see excessive sedation, so that's not a current issue. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Vikram Purohit from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open. Good morning, and thank you for taking my call. This is Gospel on for Vikram. My question is, what can we expect to learn from the LUMINARY readout later this year? What do you believe defines success for this readout? Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Gospel. Let me start and then ask Jim to talk more about Luminary. I will remind you that we designed SAGE-718 to be a positive modulator for NMDA. It was based on the hypothesis that 24S-hydroxycholesterol was seen at lower levels in cognitively impaired neurodegenerative patients, specifically discovered in Huntington's disease. We set out for the kind of most homogeneous population first, which is Huntington's, then Parkinson's. While Alzheimer's is much more heterogeneous, what we're hoping to see is the same kind of stabilization or improvement in executive function and memory that we saw in Huntington's and Parkinson's patients. Those are the data we're looking for later in the year. Jim, anything to add? Yeah. Barry, I'd add to that we believe that SAGE-718 offers a truly novel opportunity here using the mechanism that Barry described. This is a way of interacting with NMDA receptors, a very powerful system in the brain. We've designed what we call the Cognito program to really examine the ability of 718 to have effects on learning and memory, executive function, across a number of different patient populations with the idea of a truly new way of interacting with cognitive deficits in a number of these disorders. At this point, you know, we're trying to understand which patient populations show the most benefits. To date, we've talked about the results from the Huntington's and Parkinson's populations. Luminary represents a similar investigation of Alzheimer's patients. By intent, many of the endpoints and many of the trial design elements are similar across studies. We'll be looking to see what effects we're having in the AD population. You know, you can anticipate that many of the sort of trial design elements and endpoints are gonna be similar to what we've looked at with both the Huntington's and Parkinson's patient populations. All right. Thank you very much. Thanks, Gospel. Thank you. At this time, I would like to turn the call back over to Barry Greene for closing remarks. Thanks, operator. Thank you again to everyone for joining us this morning to review our third quarter progress. I'm grateful to the entire Sage team, our patients, clinical investigators, and all who've dedicated so much to advance our mission to become the leaders in brain health. I'm confident that the progress made this year and what we hope to achieve throughout the balance of the year next year will bring us closer to bringing new paradigm-shifting therapeutics to market. The Sage team will continue to work tirelessly to deliver on our vision of developing medicines that matter to patients so that they get better sooner. Thanks again, everyone, and have a great day. This concludes today's conference call. Thanks for participating. You may now disconnect.