Hello and welcome to the SolarEdge conference call for the Q1 ended March 31, 2024. This call is being webcast live on the company's website at www.solaredge.com in the Investors section on the Events Calendar page. This call is the sole property and copyright of SolarEdge, with all rights reserved, and any recording, reproduction, or transmission of this call without the expressed written consent of SolarEdge is prohibited. You may listen to a webcast replay of this call by visiting the Event Calendar page of the SolarEdge Investor website. I would now like to turn the call over to J.B. Lowe, Head of Investor Relations for SolarEdge. Please begin. Thank you, Chloe, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss SolarEdge's operating results for the Q1 ended March 31, 2024, as well as the company's outlook for the Q2 of 2024. With me today are Zvi Lando, Chief Executive Officer, and Ronen Faier, Chief Financial Officer. Zvi will begin with a brief review of the results for the Q1 ended March 31, 2024. Ronen will review the financial results for the Q1, followed by the company's outlook for the Q2 of 2024. We will then open the call for questions. Please note that this call will include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the safe harbor statements contained in our press release, the slides posted on our website ahead of this call today, and our filings with the SEC for a more complete description of such risks and uncertainties. Please note this presentation describes certain non-GAAP measures, including non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP net diluted earnings per share, which are not measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The non-GAAP measures are presented in this presentation because we believe that they provide Investors with a means of evaluating and understanding how the company's management evaluates the company's operating performance. Reconciliation of these measures can be found in our earnings release, presentation, and SEC filings. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation from, as substitutes for, or superior to financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Listeners who do not have a copy of the quarter-ended March 31, 2024, press release or the supplemental material may obtain a copy by visiting the Investor Relations section of the company's website. I will now turn the call over to Zvi. Thank you, J.B. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us on our conference call. Starting with highlights of our Q1 results, we concluded the quarter with approximately $204 million in revenue. Revenues from our solar business were approximately $190 million, while revenues from our non-solar businesses were approximately $14 million. This quarter, we shipped 1.1 million power optimizers, 69,000 inverters, and 128 megawatt-hours of batteries. As we have done on previous calls, I will start with the market dynamics we see in the various regions and end markets, our underlying demand in these markets, and the implications on sell-through and inventory cleanup. Starting with the U.S. residential segment. As we commented last quarter, we did not expect significant changes in this market as long as interest rates and electricity prices remain at recent levels. As a result, our Q1 results largely reflect traditional seasonality, with inverter and optimizer sell-through down 19% quarter over quarter. However, we have seen continued strength in the uptake of our single-phase battery product in the U.S. market, and sell-through of our battery product was up 26% quarter over quarter. This strength is coming from California, with the accelerating adoption of battery-tied NEM 3.0 systems, as well as Puerto Rico, where customers need full backup capability. Our DC-coupled solution is particularly well-suited for these applications, given the incremental energy that is generated when compared with many alternative products. Moving to U.S. commercial, sell-through was down 22% from a record Q4, largely due to seasonality. We are encouraged by the trajectory of this market, which is expected to grow this year due, among other reasons, to the continued demand from large enterprise customers who want to standardize their global portfolios on our product. On a year-over-year basis, sell-through of our commercial inverters was up 42% in the U.S. Moving to Europe. The market started the year slowly due to a slightly longer-than-usual winter and continued digestion of recent regulatory changes. In residential, sell-through in Europe was seasonally down 19% quarter-over-quarter, with inverters and optimizers down 20% and batteries down 13%. In commercial, sell-through was down 2%, reflecting the relative strength of this market and the good position we have based on the same dynamics that I mentioned when discussing the U.S. commercial market. Touching on some of our major markets in Europe. In Germany, the market started the year more slowly than anticipated as declining electricity prices have negatively impacted the economics of solar. There is, however, an expectation that market dynamics will improve given the passing of Solar Package One by the German Parliament two weeks ago, which will simplify regulatory requirements on new solar installations. Among other measures in the package are increased feed-in tariffs for commercial installations and incremental support for agri-photovoltaic projects, which we expect will increase demand for our products specifically given our strengths in these segments. In the Netherlands, consumer confidence is recovering slowly following the clarifications around net metering in the fourth quarter, while the market remains at relatively depressed levels compared to recent years. We expect the market to continue to recover slowly, and we are focusing on developing solutions, in particular on the software side, that will enable us to gain share in this market. I will expand on some of these initiatives in a moment. In the rest of the world, we have not seen significant changes in market dynamics outside of typical seasonality, and our revenues continue to be largely derived from Thailand, Taiwan, South Africa, Australia, and Israel. The aggregation of these trends and dynamics, in particular the slower pace of seasonal pickup in Germany, translated into Q1 sell-through of approximately $440 million, which was slightly below our expectations. The lower level of sell-through resulted in us undershipping demand by approximately $250 million at the lower end of the $250 million-$300 million range we anticipated and discussed in our call last quarter. Taking the Q1 into account and assuming the traditional seasonality patterns and market trends as we see them today would bring us at the end of the year to the lower end of the range of underlying business run-rate level that we estimated in our previous call for that period. Our expectation for the Q2 is that sell-through should be up 15%-20% versus the Q1, meaning we expect to undership demand in the second quarter by approximately $250 million-$300 million. Moving to products. Last month, we announced the acquisition of Wevo, which provides software solutions for C&I EV charging optimization, management for corporate employee charging, fleet charging, and charging in apartment buildings. The Wevo solution has already been deployed in Europe, Asia, and North America at approximately 1,000 sites, and more than 215,000 charging sessions have been conducted to date on the Wevo platform. Wevo, together with Hark, the energy optimization platform for integrated loads control and industrial IoT that we acquired in the Q2 of 2023, augment the SolarEdge C&I energy management platform and together form SolarEdge ONE for C&I. In all, SolarEdge ONE for C&I is an energy management platform that enables PV and asset owners to manage all on-site electrical power and optimizes PV production, storage, EV charging, and loads. This is achieved by consolidating internal and external data to make hundreds of intelligent energy decisions on a real-time basis. To help explain, I'd like to give a real-world example of how SolarEdge ONE for C&I is being deployed by one real estate company in a way that enables them to benefit from the SolarEdge offering. This real estate company has a portfolio of roughly 150 assets ranging from supermarkets to logistics centers, cold storage facilities, and office buildings. This customer wanted a complete hardware and software solution that will enable them to generate clean and cheap electricity where relevant and optimize energy management, including selling the generated power to tenants and assisting the tenants with their own energy optimization needs. Given the diversity of the asset portfolio, the combined hardware and software configuration will be optimized per site and application on the basis of the flexibility of our portfolio. In the coming months, we will be deploying PV to approximately 20% of the sites and One for C&I to all sites on the basis of a paid subscription. We believe that the rollout of SolarEdge ONE for C&I and the additional features that we will deliver in the coming quarters creates differentiation for our solution that will enable us to capture market share and improve profitability, including through the ability to sell software services that deliver recurring revenue. On our last earnings call, we also announced the first shipments of our commercial outdoor battery solution. This new commercial battery will be a key piece of the hardware solution that is managed and optimized by One for C&I, along with our C&I inverters, EV chargers, and energy meters. We recently began taking orders for our commercial battery in Italy and will be rolling the product out to additional markets across Europe and the rest of the world in the coming quarters. At Intersolar next month, we will be showing an additional commercial DC-coupled storage system optimized for indoor applications, which is a common application in some European markets, with shipments planned for Q1 next year. Continuing with C&I, an additional angle to broadening our addressable market in this space is pushing into the multi-dwelling unit, or MDU, market. The MDU space is a relatively untapped market that is gaining regulatory support in various countries and is taking the first steps on its decarbonization journey. This market will require comprehensive portfolio-level solutions that incorporate PV, batteries, EV chargers, heat pumps, and energy management capabilities. We aim to be a leading provider of hardware and software solutions that will bring the energy transition to these types of buildings where roughly 50% of people in the OECD live. To broaden our exposure to this space, we recently made investments and signed commercial partnerships with two software companies in the MDU space: Ivy Energy based in California and Ampeers based in Munich, Germany. Both Ivy and Ampeers provide software solutions to help large real estate owners design and implement plans to decarbonize their multi-dwelling portfolios and harvest the benefits of smart renewable energy solutions. Energy management is also an important enabler in the residential space, and we continue to roll out new features for SolarEdge One for residential. Last month, we added a dynamic rate optimization feature, and we have approximately 1,500 users enrolled across the Netherlands and the UK. We will be rolling out this new capability to additional countries, including Belgium, Sweden, Poland, and Germany, in the coming months. The dynamic rate capability joins the negative rate optimization tool we added to SolarEdge One for residential last year in the Netherlands. We have 10,000 sites enrolled in negative rate optimization as of today and have mitigated 162 negative rate events since launching the product in the Q4 of 2023. We will continue to roll out additional features in the coming months that will help us maintain our technological leadership and gain market share in the residential space. As the reliance on software increases and given that residential and commercial PV systems are connected directly to the utility grid, cybersecurity is of critical importance. Over the past few quarters, we have increased our investment and activity on cybersecurity capabilities and certifications, and we will continue to ensure that we are at the forefront of this topic in our industry, in particular as regulations are being drafted and implemented in multiple jurisdictions. Let's talk now about new residential products. At Intersolar in a few weeks, we will be displaying our next-generation large-capacity three-phase inverter for the European residential market that is expected to be released early next year. This new 20-kilowatt inverter is optimized for the larger rooftops and system sizes that we are increasingly seeing in the German-speaking countries, where the increased need for electricity and self-consumption is leading consumers to utilize all roof surfaces and increase system sizes. As historically, our products have been optimized for larger PV-plus storage residential systems. This solution will further enhance our differentiation in this segment. This new inverter is based on silicon carbide power switches to drive better efficiencies and will incorporate improved safety and installability features as well. To complement this next-generation inverter, we are also developing our next-generation residential battery. This battery will be based on a single platform that will unite our single-phase and three-phase platforms into one. We will elaborate more on this and other new products in the pipeline for the residential North American market on our next earnings call. These new products will help drive down cost per watt and deliver improved installability to our customers, saving them precious time on site. In parallel to the products above, which are to be released in the coming quarters, we continue to ramp and see growing demand for the products we released over the last few quarters. On our tracker product, there are approximately 100 megawatts that have been installed or are in the process of installation and confirm orders for approximately 60 additional megawatts that are scheduled to be installed this year. On our 330-kilowatt TerraMax inverter, we recently received an order and began installation of a 20-megawatt floating PV project. Moving to operations. In our Austin, Texas facility, we manufacture approximately 250 megawatts of single-phase inverters in the Q1 and are on target to meet a 500-megawatt manufacturing run rate in the Q2. Additionally, in the Q2, we will begin shipments of optimizers and commercial inverters from our second U.S. contract manufacturing facility located in Florida. Also, on the operational side, in the North American market, we plan to consolidate our product portfolio around an 11.4-kilowatt made-in-the-U.S. inverter and 650-watt optimizer platform. The initiative will reduce both the number of hardware platforms and the number of SKUs across our North American portfolio. This will result in a more streamlined manufacturing process and improve efficiencies across supply chain, logistics, inventory, management, and services. Following the consolidation to a single platform, all new inverters will come pre-equipped with PCS, which means customers can install much more PV while avoiding costly main panel upgrades. In closing, our Q1 results were aligned with our expectation of inventory clearing and typical seasonality. As we enter spring, when installations historically tend to rise, we expect channel inventory to continue to decline and revenues to improve. In parallel, we are focused on a suite of new products that we plan to release in the next several quarters to position ourselves for the next growth cycle in our industry. I will now hand it over to Ronen. Thank you, Zvi. Good afternoon, everyone. Total revenues for the Q1 were $204.4 million. Revenues from our solar segment, which includes the sales of PV-attached residential and commercial batteries, were $190.1 million. Total revenues from the United States this quarter were $65.3 million, representing 34% of our solar revenues. Solar revenues from Europe were $85.7 million, representing 45% of our solar revenues. Rest of the world solar revenues were $39.1 million, representing 21% of our total solar revenues. On a megawatt basis, we shipped 226 megawatts to the United States, 443 megawatts to Europe, and 276 megawatts to the rest of the world for just under 950 megawatts of total shipments. As in the Q4 of 2023, this quarter, the geographical mix of our revenues is mainly a result of the inventory situation in the channels and is not necessarily representing the installation rates, competitive environment, or long-term trends. 68% of the megawatt shipments this quarter were commercial products, and the remaining 32% were residential. In the Q1, we shipped 128 megawatt-hours of our residential batteries, with the majority shipped to the United States, where we see steady growth in installation rates. Similar to last quarter, there was a large portion of shipments of single-phase batteries that are manufactured using our inventory of higher-cost cells that carry significantly lower gross margins. In the Q1, due to the continued inventory imbalances in the distribution channels, we shipped a higher ratio of inverters to optimizers. As a result, average selling price per watt this quarter, excluding battery revenues, was $0.172, a 27% decrease from $0.236 last quarter. While the typical ratio of inverters to optimizers is one inverter to 24 optimizers, the ratio this quarter was one inverter to 16 optimizers. This quarter, we initiated some price decreases in targeted regions and products in order to help our distribution channel partners reach balanced levels of their inventory, which will be reflected in our financials starting next quarter. Our battery ASP per kilowatt-hour was $383 this quarter, down from $403 per kilowatt-hour in the previous quarter. The decrease is largely due to the previously announced price decreases on our residential batteries, offset by a mixed changes between our commercial and residential batteries. Revenues this quarter from our non-solar business, comprising our energy storage and all other segments, were $14.1 million. Following the discontinuation of our LCV business, this revenue is mostly attributed to our energy storage division and is following the seasonal pattern of this industry, which sees higher revenues in the back end of the year. Consolidated GAAP gross margins for the quarter were -12.8% compared to -17.9% in the prior quarter, as last quarter included higher charges from discontinued operations and restructuring activities. Non-GAAP consolidated gross margins this quarter were -6.5% compared to +3.3% in the prior quarter. This amount includes 450 basis points of net IRA benefit. Gross margin for the solar segment was -3.5% compared to +4% in the prior quarter. Similar to the last quarter, I would like to give some additional color on the movement of our gross margin given the continued environment of depressed revenues. As a reminder, the first layer of our gross margin, which we define as direct gross margin, is the difference between the price paid by our customers and our direct costs paid to our contract manufacturers. This margin layer is not dependent on revenue level but only on product and geographical mix. In the Q1, direct gross margin was relatively similar to what we saw in the Q4. We had initially anticipated a reversal of the negative impact of product mix of our Q4 2023 revenues. However, the continued adoption of our lower-margin single-phase battery in the United States significantly exceeded our expectations and continued to weigh on our direct gross margins in Q1, offsetting the margin benefits from less revenues derived from customers benefiting from volume pricing. As a reminder, the single-phase batteries sold mainly in the United States utilize battery cells we purchased at higher prices. Once those cells are consumed, our next battery generations will allow the return to our target margin on the residential battery product. The second layer of expenses that make up our gross margin, which we define as other costs of goods sold or OCOGs, are not directly related to product volumes sold and are largely but not entirely fixed costs. In the Q1, we lowered our non-GAAP other COGS by roughly 21% on an absolute dollar basis. But the relatively higher decline in revenues led to these economies of scale that had a negative impact of 750 basis points on our Q1 solar gross margins. On the positive side, in OCOGs, we continue to see a steady improvement in our warranty costs and reduced accrual rates in relation to the sale of new products. This is a result of our transition to use certain automotive-grade components as well as other activities that improve our install-based resilience. We've also seen, as a result of lower revenues, significantly lower shipment costs. This quarter, we also increased our accruals for obsolete inventory by approximately $9 million. Our obsolete inventory accrual policy, applied to our unnaturally high inventory level, requires us to continue and evaluate risks of inventory obsolescence and to take the needed actions. It is important to note that the accrual by itself doesn't mean that the inventory is obsolete but rather reflects a higher probability of such obsolescence. We are diligently working on reducing and utilizing our inventory levels of both finished goods and raw materials. Gross margins for our non-solar segments were negative 47.2%, down from negative 2.2% last quarter, a result of seasonally lower sales in our non-solar storage business and low utilization of Sella II factory. The Q1 typically marks the seasonally lowest quarter of our storage business, and we expect improved revenues and margins in the coming quarters. On a non-GAAP basis, operating expenses for the Q1 were $109.2 million compared to $118.3 million in the prior quarter. Our OPEX was lower than our guided range, largely due to one-time items. We continue to anticipate operating expenses to stabilize at a range of $112-$117 million, including the impact of our workforce reduction we implemented in the Q1. We will continue to push for our expenditures to go down while allowing significant resources for our technology and new product development. GAAP operating loss for the quarter was $173.7 million compared to an operating loss of $237.6 million in the previous quarter. Non-GAAP operating loss for the quarter was $122.5 million compared to an operating loss of $107.8 million in the previous quarter. Operating loss from the solar segment was $110.4 million this quarter compared to an operating loss of $93.9 million in the previous quarter. Operating loss from our non-solar segment was $12.1 million this quarter compared to an operating loss of $13.9 million in the previous quarter. Non-GAAP financial expense for the quarter was $4.8 million compared to a non-GAAP financial income of $29.8 million in the previous quarter. Our non-GAAP tax benefit was $18.7 million this quarter compared to a non-GAAP tax benefit of $25.5 million in the previous quarter. Our Non-GAAP tax rate for the quarter was 15%, and we expect it to climb back towards 20% as the business returns to profitability. GAAP net loss for the Q1 was $157.3 million compared to a GAAP net loss of $162.4 million in the previous quarter. Our Non-GAAP net loss was $108.6 million compared to a Non-GAAP net loss of $52.5 million in the previous quarter. GAAP net diluted loss per share was $2.75 for the first quarter compared to $2.85 in the previous quarter. Non-GAAP net diluted loss per share was $1.90 compared to $0.92 in the previous quarter. Turning now to the balance sheet. As of March 31st, 2024, cash, cash equivalents, bank deposit, restricted bank deposits, and investments were approximately $950 million, which we expect to be the lowest cash point for this year. Net of debt, this amount is approximately $316 million. This quarter, cash used in operation activities was $217 million. This cash utilization is a result of the inventory buildup and the associated vendor payments related to the inventory manufacturing. We believe that in the Q1, we completed the adjustments of our manufacturing commitments to the required level amid our current inventory position. As of March 31st, our inventory level, net of reserve, was at $1.55 billion compared to $1.44 billion in the prior quarter. Our average inventory days increased from 386 days in the Q4 to 619 days in the Q1. The cash flow used for manufacturing was partially offset by a significant reduction in accounts receivables as we continued to make collections from customers despite lengthened payment terms. Accounts receivable net decreased this quarter to $404.4 million compared to $622.4 million last quarter. As a result, we brought down DSO from 265 days in the Q4 to 220 days in the Q1. As part of our $300 million share repurchase program authorized by our board of directors in the Q4 of 2023, this quarter, we repurchased 506,000 shares of our common stock for an average gross purchase price of $65.67 per share for a total of approximately $33 million. Further shares purchases continued in April, and we will continue to responsibly implement the program based on our cash flow developments and expectations. Turning to guidance for the Q2 of 2024. We are guiding revenues to be within the range of $250-$280 million. We expect non-GAAP gross margins to be within the range of -4% to 0%, including approximately 350 basis points of net IRA benefit. We expect our non-GAAP operating expenses to be within the range of $116-$120 million. Revenues from the solar segment are expected to be within the range of $225-$255 million. Gross margins from our solar segment are expected to be within the range of negative 3% to positive 1%, including approximately 420 basis points of net IRA benefit. I will now turn the call to the operator to open it up for a question. Operator, please. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star and one on your telephone keypad. You may withdraw yourself from the queue at any time by pressing star two. And once more, that is star and one for your questions. We also ask that you limit yourself to one question with one follow-up to allow time for everyone to ask their question. And we'll move first to Andrew Percoco with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Great. Thanks so much for taking the question. I guess just to start out here on margin guidance, obviously, a lot to unpack. But if I just look at the Q1, your revenue actually was somewhat in line with your guidance, but margins missed. And my understanding is it was mostly related to mix shift, I guess, a lack of reversal in mix shift that you were expecting following the Q4. So can you just give us a sense for what you're expecting for the remainder of 2024 beyond just the Q2 and whether or not you're comfortable in your prior guidance in terms of your ability to get back to the 30% range by the end of the year? Thank you. Sure, Andrew, and thank you for the question. I'll start by saying that we're still playing the rule of small numbers relatively. Just to explain it a little bit, in general, the amount of batteries that we planned when we guided for our gross margin was a certain level that was exceeded by approximately $15 million of additional battery sales that we did not anticipate, just given the fact that the demand for single-phase batteries in the United States is better than we expected. The entire result is actually related to the difference of the margin of having more batteries at a very low margin compared to where we planned it. Had it been a regular quarter at a regular business level, this would be very minimal effects. At this revenue level, it's relatively large. Now, in essence, it's a little bit of a zero-sum game because all of these batteries are based on battery cells that we've already acquired, are already in our inventory. It's just a question of how quickly we consume it. By definition, if we sell a lot more of them right now, we will sell less of them next year when we're going to basically consume all of them. It's just a shift of the margin. In general, what we are doing - and this is already baked into the Q2 gross margin guidance - we are assuming slightly higher battery sales than we initially anticipated when we started the year. At the beginning, it's already there. The second thing is, of course, that given the very small revenues that we have and we assume that they will grow towards the end of the year, we assume that any impact in that size of difference in mix will be very, very minimal. So no change in our, I would call it, stabilized margin projection. Understood. Okay. That's helpful. But I guess as a follow-up to that, can you maybe bridge that to cash flow expectations for the year and maybe how you're thinking about liability management? I think you have a debt maturity next year to think about. So how are you thinking about that as it relates to cash flow expectations this year and liability management? Thank you. Sure. So of course, cash, especially in these times of very low revenues, is one of the major items that we're keeping our eyes on. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we expect this quarter to be actually the lowest cash point for the year. The main reason for the position that we're in right now is the fact that, while we did see the revenues declining already when we guided for Q4 and then for Q1, you still have commitments for inventory procurement and also for manufacturing towards your contract manufacturers. That means that during the Q1, we still manufactured more than we actually sold. This, of course, results in the fact that we had to pay for the inventory, and we had to pay our vendors. What happens in the Q2 that this phenomenon is actually reversing. We are going to start selling more than our actual manufacturing. And actually, we're going to utilize the inventory that is just $1.55 billion of cash sitting in the form of products. And once we're going to start reversing those, we expect the cash to start to be generated again. So we already expect to see cash generation in Q2. And we're going to see intensified generation into Q3 and Q4, where not just that we will have higher revenues, we will also have higher utilization of the inventory. Thanks so much. And one thing, by the way, just to complete on the convertible bond. Currently, of course, these amounts, we treat them as debt. They're out of the money. We treat them as debt. We work under the assumption that these are monies that will have to be refunded to the debt holders. And as such, we simply make sure that all of our cash positions are not taking them into account as something that we can use. And we'll take our next question from Brian Lee with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Hey, guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. I jumped on the call late, so I apologize if you already addressed this, Ronen. But can you update us on sort of what you're seeing in the pricing environment? Are you taking any new actions in the US? I know in the past, you've been saying the US pricing situation's pretty stable. And then in Europe, in the past, you've said mid to high single-digit price declines are what you're planning to implement. Have you implemented those already? Do you see any more actions potentially being needed in terms of pricing in Europe given the market dynamics out there? And then I had a follow-up. Sure, Brian. And thanks for the question. So actually, we have already started to implement price reductions in various forms this quarter. I would divide them to two. The first one are price reductions that we've implemented to our batteries. And this is something that is done across the board and across the products. And this simply means that you buy today batteries at a lower price than you used to. In other regions, what we're trying to do is actually to make our price reductions a little bit more effective in the way that they help our customers because we need to remember that some of our customers are sitting on large amounts of inventories. And sometimes, if you're reducing prices, those loyal customers of yours or channels that have a lot of inventory are in an inferior position to someone that's just entering the market or has less inventory and therefore being a little bit damaged by this. And this is something that, of course, we don't want to do. So what we are doing is that we're trying to match various price reductions or initiatives to help those. For example, in Europe today, we see that we have a lower ratio of optimizers in the channels compared to inverters. That means that our channels will have to buy more optimizers. What we basically did is that we have temporarily reduced the price of our optimizers in those regions in order to make sure that when our distributor is buying those optimizers, he basically gets them at the lower price. He can sell, by the way, the entire system at the lower price. And we are not just allowing them to get a better pricing. We also help them to get rid of some of the inventory that they have. And by this, we are accelerating the inventory clearing. So we definitely do this. We're very flexible in the way that we did. We do it. We put a lot of thought about how to not just have the reduction amount but how to use it properly. And yes, we're doing it in every region separately. In the U.S., I must say that we don't see a lot of this right now because, as we mentioned before, again, the environment is relatively stable. Okay. That's helpful. And then I know there's been a lot of focus on the gross margins here. I guess I'm a little surprised that with the revenue pickup in Q2, the gross margin guidance isn't improving a bit more. I know there's a lot of volume and fixed cost drivers or absorption drivers that ultimately are going to be a big part of the gross margin ramp back up. So I guess two questions here. What actions are you taking to kind of get back to that target of 25%-27% if that's still the appropriate target? And is there anything that maybe you've been surprised by or is more challenging than you thought and isn't getting you maybe a gross margin uplift on better volumes here in the very near term? Thank you. Sure. First of all, no surprises here from our side given the fact that we still expect to see gross margins where we said all along they will be towards the end of the year. We don't see change in the end target. The two main differences that you see right now compared to maybe a quarter ago is that, one, the rate of selling our residential batteries in the U.S. is a little bit quicker than we thought. And again, when you have relatively limited revenues, you just dilute the margins by very low-margin products, and that's the result. Here, by the way, again, it's a zero-sum game because the quicker we are consuming them, that means that margin will recover in 2025 when we completely get rid of those batteries. That's the easier part. The second part is actually related to regular seasonal effect that we see every year. Usually, in the second and Q3 because of summer, we see a little bit of a higher spending on actual warranty expenses. You see more, first of all, replacement of units. It's easier to go on the roof to replace units. And sometimes, you see a little bit of a higher failure rate during the summer. So here, really, it's a combination of faster battery sales and no surprises with the overall OCOGs. Again, our long-term target remains exactly the same. All right. Thanks so much. I'll pass it on. Thank you. And we'll move next to Philip Shen with Roth Capital Partners. Your line is open. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. The first one is a follow-up on pricing. Ronen, our checks suggest you guys may be launching or may have launched recently a new promotion in the European Resi segment, which is when you buy a kilowatt, you get an optimizer free. So wondering if you could comment on the specifics around that promotion? Our sense is it's across Europe. Our sense is it will last from May 1st to September 1st. And so just curious if you can talk about the dynamics there. And then from an inventory standpoint, it seems like there might be still a year left of inventory for the European Resi segment. This might slow things down from a channel clearing standpoint because the distributors will get a coupon to then have to buy more optimizers or at least more product. And so given that dynamic, when do you think the European channel can clear? And if you agree that it might be a little bit slower now. Thanks. So first of all, the initiative that you mentioned, Phil, is exactly to my last answer, is exactly one of the tools that we're taking. What we basically saw here is that we see a higher ratio of inverters to optimizers within our channels in Europe. A result of the fact that at the very beginning of 2023, we had problems to provide inverters. Everyone ordered so many. And then the slowdown in the market came in. And what we have identified is that whether they like it or not, a lot of the distributors will have to buy quite a lot of optimizers. This will be a necessity for them. Had we just decided to reduce prices across the board of all of our products, that means that they would not really benefit from this price decrease given the fact that what they need is optimizers. So the initiative around optimizers was very easy. Let's help our distributors exactly where they need it because they will have to buy. And by allowing them to buy cheaper optimizers because basically, giving one on every kilowatt under this initiative means that they need, I don't know, like four instead of five. But that basically means that now they can sell a full system with an inverter that they have a little bit quicker. So these kind of initiatives are simply helping to clear the inventory a little bit faster. As of the time and time to clear, this is very much different between various distributors. Actually, it's also very much different sometimes between various products with those distributors. I can tell you that some of the distributors, for example, that ordered a lot of commercial inverters, just given the fact that we didn't have enough in 2023, have maybe too many of them. And one other distributor that didn't order so much has a little bit of lack of those inverters. On average, what we do see, we see a much lower inventory levels that reflect one year. And we believe that as the year will continue, we will see gradual runoff of some of the products from the shelves and not just that one day across the board, all products will be finished. So we will continue to see gradual increase in revenues, gradual increase in shipment, and gradual clearing of the inventories. But again, we do not expect in most of the cases to see a year worth of inventory in total on the shelves in Europe. Okay. Thank you for all that color. Shifting over to a housekeeping question here on the Q2 guide. Can you talk to us about what you expect the ratio of inverters and optimizers to be in Q2? Thanks. So we do not give it yet simply because of the fact that, again, we haven't shifted in those numbers. Every small difference or shifting is making a big difference. In general, we do expect to see a higher ratio of optimizers to inverters this quarter and I would say even in the upcoming quarter. So I would say that we expect it to be higher than the normal 1 to 24. But again, it's a very volatile environment. So I mean, not be surprised that there is a little bit of diversion here. But directionally, more than 1 to 24 or 24 to 1. Thank you, Ronen. I'll pass it on. We'll move next to Mark Strouse with JP Morgan. Your line is open. Yes. Thank you very much for taking our questions. So outside of the pandemic years, just kind of looking back over your history, we've kind of thought about your ability to bring down your cost per watt kind of in the mid- to high single digits or so, looking forward to learning more about the new products you have coming out. But just kind of curious if you can talk generally, should we expect the efficiency improvements, the cost declines to kind of be in line with that versus kind of a step function change that you can talk about? Yeah. Mark, thanks for the question. And I think you gave the answer yourself. So typically, over the life of a product or a generation of a product, we are able to reduce costs roughly at the rate that average prices decline in the market, so kind of a 10% per year. And then we're able to take larger step cost reductions when we move to new generations, especially when we're moving to higher capacity generations because one of the advantages of our architecture is that on the module-level electronics, the cost per watt is kind of fixed. But on the inverter side, we're able to reduce the cost per watt with larger inverters. And when the market goes to larger systems, that enables cost reduction. So generally speaking, at a very high level, if you look at our next-generation three-phase inverter that I was discussing, that will enable a step function reduction of cost per watt compared to the current-generation inverter for that size of an installation in the range of 30%-50% in the shift between generations compared to the annual rate, if you will, of about 10%, if that's clear enough, Mark. Yeah. Yeah. That's very helpful. Look forward to seeing that. And then just a quick follow-up, Ronen. Just going back to the low-margin single-phase batteries, are you able to quantify what that inventory looks like? You said 2025 clearing a couple of times now. Just curious. I mean, with the crystal ball you have now, do you think that in 2025 or later in the years, any color you have there would be great? Thank you. Thanks, Mark. And first of all, by the way, looking at the industry performance in the last few quarters, crystal balls are not easy here. But in general, the way that we look at it is this is basically a product that is based on around 1 GW that we acquired from Samsung. And here, actually, we expected it always to be basically ending, if you remember in the history, around the end of this year. Now, of course, that all in all, the industry is a little bit slower than it used to be. We believe that we will enter this market with this inventory into 2025. And that will be the year that we believe that we'll see some replacement with our new products. Now, the question here is going to be a combination of two things. One is, again, to continue to see how the market adopts the product. And second will be, when do we expect the product to be ready? And maybe we'll talk about it in the next calls. But we will make sure that we're basically continuing with this product as much as needed in order to make sure that we have no product gap. The one thing I would say is that right now, it's not just the fact that we're selling these batteries a little bit faster than the others. It's also the fact that the three-phase batteries that are enjoying much better margins in Europe, right now, the sales for them are relatively low given the situation in Europe. So when we look at the improvement of gross margins related to batteries into the end of this year and beginning of next year, it's not just how quickly we're clearing this, which is, of course, an important factor. But it's also what portion of these batteries are within the overall residential batteries we sell. Right now, this portion is very high. So all in all, middle of 2025, we believe that we'll be gone with this inventory. Thank you. And we'll take our next question from Colin Rush from Oppenheimer. Your line is open. Thanks so much, guys. With the product redesigns and evolution, can you give us a sense of how much cost you feel like you could take out? And how important is that to the margin trajectory that you guys are talking about getting back to a normalized level? Yeah. Colin, thanks for the question. I think first, Ronen will correct me. The margin projections that Ronen was discussing before were not dependent on the new product that we will be releasing because the volumes when we're looking at the rest of this year, the volumes of the new products will not be impacting dramatically the financials. As I was alluding before, it varies from different products. You take a battery. A battery that costs is very strongly dominated by the cells. So when you move from a current generation to a next generation, you're dependent on cell prices. You can become more efficient on the mechanics and the power electronics. But your potential for cost reduction is, at the end of the day, limited. When you're talking about the next generation of inverter, new components and efficiencies, the potential for step function reduction in cost is much more significant. So as I was referring before to the new three-phase inverter, taking into account when looking at the installation size that we're targeting for that inverter, so the segment of a large residential installation, we will be able to serve with a solution that is probably in the range of about 50% lower cost per watt of the inverter compared to serving that application with current-generation inverters. That is not necessarily the cost reduction that will be achieved for every size of installation. But for the targets and that's how we do the design for a target size and application that we think is going to be the main driver in the market. And for that point, we optimize the costs. And like I say, on the power electronics, in a generational move, we can be in the range of reducing the costs per watt of 30%-50%. That's helpful, guys. And with the emergence of virtual power plants, both at the residential level but more importantly, at the commercial level and some of the software investments that you guys have made, can you talk a little bit about your ability to monetize that and how quickly the evolution of those offerings are what the cadence of that evolution is and your ability to really get it embedded in with some of your customers, particularly on the commercial level? So I would separate indeed between the VPP or virtual power plants is one application of grid services that is today more prevalent in residential than it is in commercial. And we are able to monetize a subscription as long as the VPP program is active. I don't remember off the top of my head the number of batteries or residential systems that we have today under some form of a VPP. It is not huge. Otherwise, we would have probably been able to report a much better margin because of a 100% margin flow of cash. But VPP is growing. The growth rate is not huge. And when it happens, we can generate revenue from it. The other software capabilities that we enable in residential, for the most part, are not generating any type of revenue. Commercial is a different story. What we are offering there is much, much broader than virtual power plant. It provides more value. And it's a wide range of capabilities from energy efficiency, load management, etc. And there, we expect to be able to have a higher ratio of or a relatively high ratio of software services and recurring revenue generation. But it will be a process. It's something that will be rolling out gradually. And it will grow gradually. So again, I don't see it having a big impact on our numbers in the next 24 months. But it is something that in the long run will be a source of high-margin revenue. Thanks so much. We'll move next to Austin Moeller with Canaccord. Your line is open. Hi. Good afternoon. Just my first question here. Do you see any potential changes to tariffs or legislation coming that could benefit U.S.-made inverters and batteries similar to the recent change for bifacial panels? Beyond the IRA, if you can help clarify the question? The recent change was with tariff rules. Yeah. We're not aware of anything. I think that said, the adoption of an increased use of bifacial panels is a good thing for module-level power electronics providers because the incremental added harvest by module-level power electronics from a bifacial panel is more significant than from a regular panel. But that's completely a side note related to that regulation. We're not aware of anything cooking of a similar nature in the space that we operate in. Okay. Just given the interest rates remain high, what trends have you started to see in core U.S. markets like California around leasing arrangements for rooftop solar? So I think the general expectation for increase of lease versus loan is evident in the market. Again, it is not a it's not black and white and a complete switch. But we see that dynamic ourselves as well, as well as the entrance of new lease providers because of that trend and because of the tendency or the benefits that the IRA creates for third-party ownership. So that is definitely evident. And it is more evident in the battery markets like California and Puerto Rico. Excellent. Thanks for the details. And we'll take our next question from Kashy Harrison with Piper Sandler. Your line is open. Good evening. And thanks for taking my question. And apologies if this was covered as I joined late. But I was wondering if you could just share your thoughts on the forward trajectory of the non-solar business. It looks like it lost roughly $12 million in Q1, I believe, or just under $50 million annualized. Cell manufacturing is becoming a little bit more competitive. So I'm just wondering how you think about the path to either getting towards break-even operating income or selling the business or shutting it down and just focusing on the core solar business. Sure, Kashy. Thanks for the question. So in general, I'll start by maybe a little bit of dynamics but then go into the heart of the question itself. From a dynamic point of view, usually, the storage market, and especially the market in which our storage division is active, is very much back-of-the-year loaded with revenues. And that means that usually, you see very low Q1 and relatively strong Q4. And in general, we do expect to see growth in the revenues and activity of this segment. So therefore, at least directionally, losses related to the storage division should go down as we move forward towards the second half of the year, not a lot in the first half but more in the second half. Now, directionally about the segment itself, I think that there are two areas of the segment that we need to look at. The first one is having a segment that is concentrated in making storage, whether connected to solar or not. And this is something that we see very great advantage of having this kind of capabilities. Even if we're selling batteries that are not connected to PV, the knowledge, the development, and the technology that we're developing there is helpful for us. And we will continue to see multiple applications where you see storage without solar. By the way, just as an anecdote, we sell today sometimes residential batteries without a PV just for backup. In general, having this kind of an asset is something that we see a great value in. Here, we invest. It's basically a segment that is developing product. Like every development product, it takes a while. The second part of the segment is actually owning the cell manufacturing that we have in seller one. As we mentioned, seller two, sorry. As we mentioned before, our next generation of residential batteries will not use NMC cells given the dynamics in the market to have LFP Chinese cells that are so cheap. We cannot compete with those. Therefore, we understand that these cells will not be used in our residential batteries. However, there are niche applications that are very much suitable for NMC. These niche applications are, first of all, large enough to cover much more than what we have today in solar too. They're actually very nicely profitable areas. So in general here, again, we are developing the right products. We are moving towards selling more and more products into these niches that are related to frequency regulations and spinning control. We will see over time the overall, I believe, profitability coming from this segment. It's just a matter of how quickly we're able to utilize solar too and, of course, how quickly we develop the product. So right now, we see value of having this segment. We see value in developing the technology. Of course, like everything that we do in our business, we have to evaluate it from time to time. We will continue to do this. I appreciate that, Ronen. Very helpful. Just a quick follow-up. I think you mentioned $950 million of cash is the low point for the year. Can you just walk us through some of the drivers to increasing that cash balance for the rest of the year given that operating income should be negative still? Of course. I think that the main reason for where we are today is the fact that it takes a while when you're a manufacturer at least large volumes, it takes a while to stop manufacturing and to adjust it to the levels of selling that you see, by the way, as it's painfully hard to grow the manufacturing capabilities into where you want them to be. That means that over the fourth and the Q1,Q4 of 2023 and Q1 of 2024, it took us a while to break this train of manufacturing and to basically adjust the manufacturing layers other than what happens in the US because in the US, we'll manufacture as much as we can to the level of inventory. This is something that already ended. We manufactured more than we sold. That means that we need to pay to our vendors for either components or for the manufacturing itself. This is something that continued into Q1 and will, by the way, continue slightly into Q2. What happens in the meantime? First of all, we are collecting on our customer balances. We did very good quarter when it comes to collection. We will continue to do this in Q2. And now, most of the new sales that we're doing outside of the United States are going to be revenues coming from inventories that we already have and already paid for. And this is the thing that will start to turn the cash flow to be positive. Since in Q2, we will still see some payments related to the manufacturing. In Q1, we will see cash generation that will be in Q2 lower than in Q3. And from Q3, Q4, we expect to be in relatively strong cash flow generation, both, by the way, on the operating but also much less spending on CapEx or anything else. I appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. And once more, for your questions, that is star and one. We'll move next to Jordan Levy with Truist. Your line is open. Hey, y'all. It's Henry Ahearn, Jordan here. Thanks for taking my question. Just to start, could you just dig a little bit deeper into some of the pacing we can expect to see around the inventory reduction kind of over the next few quarters? I didn't hear it well. Sorry? Yeah. Can you hear me? Yes. Now, I do. Yeah. Just to start, could you dig a little more into some of the pacing we can expect around the inventory reduction over the next few quarters? Sure. So in general, and I think it also relates to how we see the inventory clearing over time, it's actually not just spacing, but it's also the ratio of how much of the inventory we're using because right now, first of all, in the last two quarters, our sales into the United States were higher compared to the rates of sales into Europe over the last few quarters, again, because of the channel inventory there. That means that if we are manufacturing in the United States, almost everything that we sell in the United States, the pacing of the inventory clearing is a little bit slower. Once we will start to see Europe growing again and because of the fact that most of the European inventory is already manufactured, the pace is going to grow. When it comes to the pace itself of finishing this kind of inventory, I would assume that of the finished good inventory that we started the year with, approximately two-thirds will be cleared towards the end of the year. Of course, here, the pace is going to be dependent on how quickly the market recovers. Of what we had at the end of the year as finished goods, about two-thirds will be clearing this year. You can linearly take it from Q2 towards the end of the year in order to get there because this is the assumption that we take. Awesome. Thanks for that. Then just a quick follow-up for me. Outside of California and Puerto Rico, which you all had mentioned, were there any other main US regions that stood out to you all from a demand perspective on battery sales this quarter, or has demand been relatively steady state in the rest of the country? Thank you. Yeah. Other than Hawaii, but Hawaii is a different story, I can't think of a state that has as high an attach rate as the two states that you mentioned. But there is definitely an increase at some level of battery uptake also in Arizona and also to some extent in Texas, probably. And we'll take our next question from Vikram Bagri with Citi. Your line is open. Good evening, everyone. I just wanted to follow up on the sell-through guidance that you gave for Q2. I believe you said 15%-20% up into Q. We're in the middle of the quarter. I was wondering if you can highlight some markets where you're seeing the strength. I imagine some markets are growing faster than that rate, and some markets are sort of underperforming relative to that rate. If you can identify markets where you're seeing that level of strength and some markets where you're not seeing the impact of the promotions and price reductions that you've implemented. Yeah. Thanks for the question. First of all, it's very multidimensional because we're talking about the split between geographies as well as between segments. Now, added onto that, really, sell-through by our distributors is not online data. So the fact that we're into the quarter doesn't mean we have that much information in front of us. It gets accumulated a bit later. I can say that there are some countries in Europe that are showing faster growth rates right now: Italy, Switzerland. As I mentioned before, Germany was a bit slow. The expectation is that it will begin to pick up because this legislation went through just a week ago. And those were probably just from specific data that I've seen. I would say that Italy and Switzerland stand out a bit. And probably also, commercial is showing, in some cases, faster growth. And this data is a combination of how we track the installation rate and sell-through. So although we're a little bit more than one month into the quarter, I don't think there's a lot of definitive information that we can give on this topic. Probably other than what I mentioned that is more evident are the countries that I referred to. Great. And on a related note, so you mentioned gaining market share through more innovation and more features in SolarEdge One software, particularly in C&I side and also on residential side going forward. We only see that R&D line item, which is $300 million on an annual basis. Could you talk about how you plan on gaining market share going forward both in the U.S. and Europe? Is the strategy to be differentiated on the software side, or there are more innovations on the hardware side that are upcoming that we don't fully appreciate? Thank you. No. Thanks for the question. Hardware has been our bread and butter for years. Our expertise or the expertise of our R&D team in power electronics is a significant differentiator for the company. It's definitely a core priority for us. As I mentioned, I gave the example in my prepared remarks of the next-generation three-phase large inverter for the European market that is targeting a growing segment. There, we definitely plan and are en route to the differentiation on the basis of hardware with the traditional factors in mind of efficiency, cost, and all of the capabilities around the interaction between the battery and the inverter. So that and a lot of the things that I didn't refer to in this conversation around safety that is coming from the optimizers where we are constantly introducing more unique safety features and, again, completely on the basis of our hardware infrastructure and capability. That said, and when you refer to the R&D investments, definitely, the ratio of software-to-hardware investments today is different than it was four or five years ago. And software takes a bigger portion because it is much more important to the customers from a world that used to be based on feed-in tariff where it just mattered how much electricity you deliver into the grid to a world today that is much more complex and self-consumption-oriented, which creates, again, another opportunity for differentiation, which we are focused on. So we're definitely taking a balanced approach between the two. But in historical perspective, it means that we're doing more in software today than we did in the past because we were always very heavily invested on the hardware side. Thank you. We'll take our next question from Christine Cho with Barclays. Your line is open. Hi. Thank you for squeezing me in. I just had one question. Last quarter, with respect to gross margins, you mentioned the single-phase batteries were a reason for the drag on gross margins similar to this quarter. But you had also mentioned that you had a higher percentage of customers with discounts and that you expected for it to revert back. You didn't mention anything about customer mix this quarter. So just curious if you did see it revert back, or was it pretty consistent with what you saw in 1Q? Or I'm sorry, last quarter. No. So actually, Christine, thank you for your question. It's actually mentioned in my prepared remarks. We did see that we saw a lower ratio of customers that enjoyed the volume discounts. And this was actually offsetting this benefit was offsetting of the additional batteries that we shipped above what we actually planned. So definitely, yes, this was the case. The surprise here actually was not the change in mix that we did not anticipate. We anticipated this one. Surprise was actually simply selling more batteries, which I think was a little bit of a good thing, at least commercially. Do you expect continued improvement on the customer mix, or no, it's back to normal in one Q? I would say that it's relatively normal. The only thing I would say is, again, it's a very small numbers game. Everyone that will give us a surprisingly large customer that will come with a surprisingly large order simply because he needs something may change it a little bit in those numbers. But in general, we do expect that the ratio that we see right now is the more normal compared to what we saw before. It does appear that there are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn it back to Zvi for any closing remarks. Thank you, operator. And thank you, everyone, for joining us on our call today. Have a good evening. Thank you. This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time and have a wonderful evening.