Welcome to the Simmons First National Corporation Q2 2023 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on a touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ed Bilek. Please go ahead. Good morning, welcome to Simmons First National Corporation Q2 2023 earnings call. Joining me today are several members of our executive management team, including our Executive Chairman, George Makris, CEO, Bob Fehlman, and President and CFO, Jay Brogdon. Before we begin the Q&A, I would like to remind you that our Q2 earnings materials, including the release and presentation deck, are available on our website at simmonsbank.com, under the Investor Relations tab. During today's call, we will make forward-looking statements about our future plans, goals, expectations, estimates, projections, and outlook, including, among others, our outlook regarding future economic conditions, interest rates, lending and deposit activity, credit quality, liquidity, and net interest margin. These statements involve risk and uncertainties, and you should therefore not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Additional information concerning some of these factors is contained in our earnings release and investor presentation, furnished with our Form 8-K today, our most recent Form 10-Q, and our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31st, 2022, including the risk factors contained in that Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Simmons assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or other information. Finally, in this presentation, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial metrics we believe provide useful information to investors. Additional disclosures regarding non-GAAP metrics, including the reconciliations of these non-GAAP metrics to GAAP, are contained in our earnings release and investor presentation, which are included as exhibits to the Form 8-K we filed this morning with the SEC and are also available on the Investor Relations page of our website, simmonsbank.com. Operator, we are ready to begin the Q&A. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star, then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question comes from Brady Gailey with KBW. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks. Good morning, guys. Good morning. Good morning. I wanted to start with the net interest margin, you know, which took a step down here, which, you know, is kind of in line with what we're seeing from a lot of your peers. How do you think about the net interest margin as we look towards the back half of this year? Brady, this is Jay. I'll jump in on that with a few initial comments to your question. you know, the biggest driver to margin and kind of the trend there so far has really been more around, you know, migration within the deposit portfolio than it has been around, you know, rate, if you will. We've seen in June, in the back half of the quarter here, and really kind of holding our heads so far into July, sort of a slowing down of that migration. I think that sort of encourages me from, you know, as I think about NIM and inflection in NIM looking forward. You know, I'll tell you that the June NIM, the pace of the pressure on NIM was quite a bit slower in June than it has been really in any of the earlier months of the first half of the year this year. That too is kind of holding its head a bit here in July. I think there's still some near-term pressure in Q3. The significance of that pressure is not nearly as, you know, significant as it has been in the first half of the year. You know, that might mean an inflection in the back half of the year, more like in Q4. Keep in mind too, that in Q4, you also have the benefit of the swap that'll kick in late September. All that to say, Q3, likely a little bit of pressure from what we see in Q2. Q4, hopefully, we see that inflecting at some point, even in the underlying trends. Then you have the benefit of the swap as well on top of that. You know, Brady, I'd just add, too, is, you know, obviously, all banks have experienced a big increase in cost of deposits. One of the things we're not afraid of is to defend our market share in a lot of our markets, that we have a very good market presence. You know, we don't want to give up that market share in those deposits. We're willing to defend those, and pay up for some of those. We did that in this quarter in some select markets, that it was really critical. Right. You know, you guys have made some good progress in taking some expenses out of your infrastructure. I know you're targeting a reduction of $50 million by the end of the year, which I think you guys will hit. Once you get beyond that. Are you happy with the expense base, or do you think you'll continue to look for opportunities to, you know, become more efficient? Yeah, definitely, we'll continue to look for opportunities there, Brady. I think there are, in fact, I know there are more opportunities beyond that. The one thing, we'll be measured and deliberate, just like we were on this initial round of the Better Bank Initiative. We talked about it for a few quarters, really kind of wanted to make sure we had our pencils sharpened, around kind of a net cost save number. We'll do the same thing if there's another round of this. You know, as we look into next year, while I do think there are, you know, incremental opportunities on the expense side, I think there will also be some opportunities just sort of on the investment side, and we'll be opportunistic in making those investments where we need to and where we feel like there are opportunities. You know, more to come on that as we, you know, kind of round out the analysis to those opportunities and feel good about talking about net numbers. All right. Finally, for me, you know, you repurchased about 1% of the company in the Q2. Is there any reason to think that that would slow, or do you think that you'll continue to consider the buyback in the back half of the year? You know, Brady, I'd say first off, we really took advantage of our pricing for us and all bank stocks in the early part of the quarter, when most banks were trading near tangible book values, very accretive to buyback at that point. Bought back $20 million in this quarter. You know, we'll continue to look at it on a quarter-by-quarter basis, based on what the market condition is and what our capital needs are. The one constraint I would say in there is we would stay within if we did stock buyback, it would be within our earnings, less our cash dividends, would be the maximum amount. We think that's a very prudent way with where our balance sheet is, and growth is projected. Okay, great. Thanks, guys. Our next question comes from David Feaster with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, everybody. Good morning, David. Morning, David. Maybe just touching on the loan yield side, just the loan growth side. You know, look, it's nice to see the growth. Obviously, construction funding has been a key driver of it. You know, when we look at the pipeline, slowing as we'd expect, but, I mean, you're really doing a great job pushing new loan yields. I'm just curious, could you touch on, from your perspective, what are you hearing from your clients? How is demand trending across your footprint? Maybe just where are you still able to get good risk-adjusted returns at this point, and just what's your appetite for loan growth? Yeah. David, a lot of questions in there, kind of, you know, in a roundabout way. Let me try to tackle several different elements of that topic. I do think I've said this on past calls and in past meetings, I think it still continues to be true that, you know, the rate environment, just the overall environment right now, has caused a fair amount of demand destruction. We continue to see that. I think that, you know, anywhere where our pricing discipline is showing up, which I think that's pretty well across the board at this point and has been. Our underwriting continues to be, you know, very, sound as it has been all the way through the cycle. When we kind of couple our underwriting standards and our pricing standards together, you know, the volume that we are seeing come into the pipeline, we feel is, you know, very, very good, relationship-oriented business with very good borrowers, and very sound structure. That's kind of what our appetite is right now. I will tell you that, you know, really, in the Q2, the last month or two, one kind of positive sign, potentially, in terms of pipeline trends, because the pipeline trend's been down, and we've been forecasting that and can really continue to expect pipeline trends to kind of be in an area where they are right now. One kind of positive sign is we are seeing some borrowers, some, you know, some customers that we deal with, and have dealt with in the past, very strong relationships, who are, it seems, more willing to put, you know, a little more cash equity into deals and with more equity in the projects that they're looking at, you know, and with our underwriting and with strong pricing, I think that's an indicator of kind of the lack of, you know, financing opportunities that are out there. We'll continue to look at those, and be opportunistic where we can be, again, with very close relationships. I think that the trend you've seen in a little bit of slowing loan growth, but still good growth, is a trend overall that I continue to expect. Paydowns are going to be low, and I don't expect that to change. Unfunded commitments, we'll continue to see good fund ups on those over the next few quarters. Pipeline, probably going to level off here, you know, in the area that it's in, but hopefully, we can continue to see some good opportunities with good borrowers. Are there any markets or segments where maybe you're seeing more opportunity and that you think you can gain share just because you are open for business still? You know, there's nothing that really jumps out that I think is worth pointing to. You know, you saw growth for us this quarter that was pretty balanced and across the board. And I think that that's still worth, you know, that's still the right way to think about it for us going forward. One area I will call out that we continue to have a lot of momentum in and be excited about is just the agri area. We've seen some really good growth and opportunities. We've got some great talent in our bank in that area and a long history in it. That's not a huge portfolio for us. That's the one area I'd call out, but I think our focus continues to be diversified and really across the portfolio. Okay. You mentioned in the presentation that we're expecting fee revenue growth to slow. I know this has been a big push for y'all for some time, and it's great to see the growth you've generated, in part from this Better Bank Initiative. I'm just curious, maybe some of the trends you're seeing in the underlying fee businesses, where you see opportunity on the fee side going forward, cross-selling across, business lines, across the franchise, and just any other thoughts on the fee revenue side? Well, I will say in the lines of business that we think about out there, whether it's, you know, wealth, mortgage, et cetera, I think there's still a lot of opportunity for us. You know, was pleased to see an uptick this quarter on the revenue side from mortgage. You know, with recent rates, you know, that's probably gonna be a little more of a challenge in Q3, but I think we'll still continue to do well there. We've got a lot of opportunities to grow in both of those areas, in particular, just by continuing to better penetrate some of the markets that we've acquired into over the past several years. That's certainly a current and, you know, intermediate term objective and opportunity for us. I think where we continue to really evaluate the fee side is just overall kind of, you know, banking services, you know, deposit charges, et cetera, where the market environment continues to get increasingly competitive in a lot of different ways. That's something that we'll continue to evaluate and ensure, to Bob's earlier point, that we're gonna protect and defend in our markets, and especially in markets where we have great market share. That's, that's the work that we're doing now. All right. That's helpful. Thanks, everybody. Thanks, David. The next question comes from Matt Olney with Stephens. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks. Good morning, everybody. Good morning, Matt. I want to go back to the funding strategy that was discussed, and I appreciate Jay's commentary about deposit migration trends stabilizing in recent weeks. Any more color on just the funding strategy that you executed in the Q2? Looks like you leaned a little more heavily on the borrowings in the first part of the quarter. Would love to just appreciate the strategy as you move into the back half of the year and any kind of changes, second part of that is, with Bob's comments about defending market share in certain cases, should we read into that the deposit betas are gonna be moving higher in the Q3 as compared to Q2? Thanks. Thanks, Matt. Well, I'd say that, you know, first and foremost, just on the funding strategy side, really throughout the quarter, I think we were just opportunistic where we needed anything, whether it was, you know, anything in the wholesale markets. There were a lot of ebb and flows, especially coming out of, you know, timelines back in March and the things that happened there within our industry, where we were able to just be opportunistic. That meant, at times, leaning more into borrowings versus brokered CDs. I think we'll continue to just kind of, you know, evaluate those markets as we need to rely on them. Generally speaking, I think the strategy going forward, as we've talked about, is more along those lines of balance sheet optimization, and needing to rely less on that type of funding. That should bear out as growth slows here a little bit. Yet, you know, we went from double-digit loan growth the last several quarters to, you know, still good single-digit growth here. I think we're getting back to a place where sort of our inherent balance sheet cash flows can hopefully fund the majority of our loan growth and, therefore, lean less into any type of wholesale borrowing. That would be the bigger part of, I think, the strategy going forward. You know, the one maybe nuance or two in there this quarter, we. You know, coming out of March in the early quarter, we definitely, yet, you know, kept a little bit higher cash balances early in the quarter than what was necessary. You might even think back to sort of debt ceiling talks that were going on in the quarter. There were some things about the, you know, the macro environment in Q2, that, you know, we felt it was just prudent to take a pretty cautious tone around you know, liquidity and what we were keeping on the balance sheet. Those were maybe just some, again, some nuances for the quarter to think about. Just follow up on that, Jay, any comments or thoughts on betas in the Q3 as it relates to what we saw in Q2? Yeah, I think. Yeah, yeah, sorry, I missed that piece of the question. Yeah, on the deposit beta front, I think I don't think betas have sort of stopped here. There's still, you know, overall pressure, really from the competitive environment on deposits that I think will continue and will continue to drive some, you know, some movement in betas. Again, I think the larger part of the beta move has been volume, if you will, more than rate. It's been that migration in and out of lower-cost deposits. I'm hopeful, you know, several weeks is not enough to really call the full trend yet, but I am optimistic in what we're seeing there and what I'm hearing from others as well. If the volume piece or the migration piece does in fact slow, while there will be some continued pressure, I think, on both NIM and on deposit betas, that's a related pressure there, I do believe that the significance of that trend seems to be slowing down here. You know, Matt, just one other item to point out on NIM is we did have our sub-debt that repriced from fixed to floating in the quarter. That was a couple million dollar negative impact to our net interest income. That's a one-time reset there. It may go up a little bit with the next move, but not at the same level it did in this quarter. That's a good call out. Yep. Yeah, thanks for that, Bob. I if I remember correctly, I think Q2 got the full impact of that reset. Day one, April first. Yep, every bit of it. Okay, perfect. I guess switching over to the loan repricing opportunities, I think that your deck called out a little over $1 billion of principal maturities over the next year at a lower rate. Would love to know just general thoughts about the repricing opportunities within that and kind of what the directives are to your production staff about where you're targeting some of those repricing levels. Yeah, I think what you see in terms of trends in our pipeline would be a similar, you know, that kind of trajectory is where we would expect, you know, repricings to be happening on renewals there and even higher, because that pipeline, you know, is built up over time as rates continue to move. You know, current day, pricing in that pipeline is higher than sort of the, you know, full pipeline itself. I think our renewal opportunities are pretty significant here on that $1 billion or $1.1 billion that we call out in the deck. You know, Matt, the other thing I'd throw in there that we're really focused on is enhancing those relationships with those renewal opportunities. you know, Where we have renewals and opportunity to bring in an operating account, or additional deposits, or additional fee business, back to a question that was asked earlier in the call, we think these are really good opportunities. There's just not a lot of credit availability in the marketplace today for our customers. We're trying to take full advantage of that to really enhance and grow our relationship, even beyond just the pricing, the loan yield piece of that equation. We think there's a lot of other opportunity at every renewal date. Okay. I appreciate that. Then, I guess, just lastly from me, I think the construction loan balances continue to migrate higher. I think you disclosed you're at 99% on the C&D kind of threshold measurements. We'd love just to appreciate kind of thoughts around those levels, could that act as a governor on the buyback, or would you be willing to move over that 100% guideline for a quarter or two? Just any kind of thoughts on that level? Yeah, Matt, I'll jump in on that one, too. you know, it's certainly not our you know, strategy to operate at above 100 for sustained periods of time. At the same time, you know, we've got a lot of expertise in those areas of production and within our business. We're not afraid to go over 100 for a period of time, I don't think you'd see us just sort of sustained operating above those levels. it's really just going to be, a function of time, stabilization rates on those projects, et cetera. Okay. Thanks for taking my questions, guys. Thanks, Matt. Thank you, Matt. The next question comes from Gary Tenner with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning, guys. Good morning. A couple of follow-up questions. I guess on the deposit side, unless I missed it, in the deck. I apologize if I did. Could you give us the June 30th, 2023 interest-bearing spot rate, just as sort of a jumping off point into the Q3? I don't think we've got that in there. I don't have that right offhand here, Gary. I'll get back to you with that, Gary. All right, thank you. In terms of the commentary about the service charges, I don't recall, you know, y'all making announcements about reductions in service charges or anything along those lines. I know last quarter, you had guided to fee income in the $43-$45 range, which you're at the top end this quarter. Does that range still hold, even with some pressure on service charges, or is there a larger delta there potentially? Well, I'll just start off on the service charges, on all of our service charges, whether it's on deposits, whether it's in wealth or investments. You know, we continue to look at that every quarter to see where we are in the market and where we need to adjust for, you know, profitability. You know, we talked about our service charges in the Q4 last year and still have not made any changes. We still evaluate it on a month-by-month basis. Don't have any plans to announce today. On a go-forward basis, Jay, you may want to comment on the overall, because we did have a couple adjustments this quarter. Well, I think, you know, you're right. We've commented historically that low to mid-40s is kind of where we expect overall fees to be on a quarterly run rate. We've been at the top end of that range, really kind of exceeded that range, in my mind, for couple quarters in a row here. You know, that's consisted in the last couple quarters of, you know, some fair value adjustments and, you know, a legal reserve reversal last quarter, et cetera. I still think that low to mid-40s range is a good range for us here. Depending on actions that we, you know, might need to take from a competitive dynamic point of view, on the deposit service side, might put me more toward the bottom to middle of that range, whereas we've been hitting the top end of that range for a couple of quarters here. Okay, thanks. I just want to make sure I didn't miss any announcements about, you know, reductions in deposit service charge side, so I appreciate the caller. The discount accretion for the quarter, the purchase accounting adjustments for the quarter, could you give us what that number was? I think we have that in here. ... it's on page eight, 17.1. 17 remaining? That's what remains.[crosstalk] Yeah. It's about $300,000. $300,000. What's the number here? $3 million. About $3 million for the quarter, a little over $17 million left. Okay. Okay, yeah, I know you had flagged kind of the delta versus the Q1. I just wanna make sure I had the number accurately. Last, for me, in terms of those fair value hedges on the securities portfolio, you know, we got a, you know, hike this week, you know, then they're even more in the money. Just, you know, you've talked in the past about the potential to unwind part or all, and I think you kind of note that in the slide deck. Just overall thoughts on that. Is the working plan to keep them in place or, you know, how are you evaluating that? We continue to evaluate those hedges as well as any other opportunities, hedging rates, candidly, in either direction. That's just a continuous exercise for us. I don't think there's anything in sort of what I would call immediate plans to unwind that hedge right now. But it is absolutely something that we'll continue to monitor. To your point, we would expect those to be further in the money, even as soon as tomorrow. All right. Thanks, guys. Appreciate it. Thank you. This concludes... Actually, there's one more question here. Stephen Scouten, Piper Sandler, please go ahead. Hey, good morning. Appreciate it. guys, I, was just curious on the progress of the $15 million, how much of that in expense saves, annual expense saves was already in the run rate, or if that $15 million would kind of be incremental to levels today? No, Stephen, I still think that, you know, we made progress this quarter, very good progress, I feel like. I'm not sure that we had any of our initiatives fully achieved in the quarter from a, you know, full kind of 90-day period, if you will. We'll certainly have full benefit of some of those initiatives here in the Q3. There are other things underway that will have partial benefit here and full benefit in Q4. I think we'll continue to chip away at that. The guidance that we've given is to sort of be able to fully hit that number net, you know, in Q4 and have that kind of out of the run rate as we go into next year. Still feel very good about our ability to meet that. Hope to even exceed that number by a little bit as we kind of turn the year next year. As we mentioned earlier in the call, we hope there's more and expect there are more opportunities beyond that, but we also believe there will be some opportunities for us to make some investments, whether that's talent acquisition or otherwise, that will further enhance our business, enhance our growth profile, enhance our scalability. We'll be balanced as to how we think about that net cost save expectation moving beyond this first $15 million, and we'll continue to inform you all of our progress around that as we move forward. Okay, great. That's really good. Then, just last thing for me. I'm curious how you think about kind of average earning asset growth from here. Sounds like working down some of the borrowings and maybe, you know, loan growth in the low, low-mid single digits. If I heard your answer to Brady's question appropriately, maybe a couple more basis points in NIM compression in the Q3. Just how do you think about the direction of the balance sheet and average earning assets? And with that compression on the NIM, what do you think the path is for overall NII dollars for the rest of this year? Well, I think that speaking to the growth piece of it, Stephen, it, you know, as we've said now for several quarters, the strategy more than anything is balance sheet optimization. It's, it's remixing the earning assets kind of day in and day out, every month, every quarter that we move through. We're having success with that. I think we can continue to have success with that as we move forward. Certainly expect to be able to rely less kind of on wholesale funding as that continues as well, and that should be pretty attractive for us from a, from a NIM point of view, as we, as we kind of move out from there. You know, absolute dollars of NII, you know, I don't, I don't have a great guide for you there that I want to be that specific with. I, you know, I think that as we remix the balance sheet, you think about earning asset mix, kind of risk-weighted asset density, I think there's good opportunity for us to grow NII as we move forward. Got it. Thanks, Jay. Appreciate the time, guys. You bet. Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference over to George Makris for any closing remarks. Thank you very much, and I appreciate all of you joining us today. I think what you are seeing at Simmons is what you should have expected, based on the history of our company, and that is conservative, diverse markets, product, and risk profile, and that's playing out well in today's market. We're certainly committed to our community banking philosophy and relationship banking, and fortunately for us, in some of the markets that we entered through acquisition, that customer base is starting to really understand, who Simmons is and what our philosophy is and, the meaning of relationship banking. I think our pause in M&A in deference to our Better Bank Initiative is certainly timely and will be very beneficial in the long term. We appreciate you joining us today, and we look forward to doing this again three months from now. Have a great day. The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.