Good afternoon, and welcome to SiTime's Q1 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. At the conclusion of today's conference call, instructions will be given for the questions and answer session. If anyone needs assistance at any time during the conference call, please press the star key followed by the zero on your touch-tone phone. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded today, Tuesday, May 4th, 2021. I would now like to turn the call over to Leanne Sievers of Shelton Group Investor Relations. Leanne, please go ahead. Good afternoon, and welcome to SiTime's Q1 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. On the call from SiTime are Rajesh Vashist, Chief Executive Officer, and Art Chadwick, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I'd like to point out that during the course of this call, the company may make forward-looking statements regarding expected future results, including financial position, strategy and plans, future operations, the timing market, and other areas of discussion. It is not possible for the company's management to predict all risks, nor can the company assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed during this call may not occur, and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied. Neither the company nor any person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this call to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in the company's expectations. For more detailed information on risks associated with our business, we refer you to the risk factors described in our 10-K filed on February 16th, 2021, as well as the company's subsequent filings with the SEC. Also, during this call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, which measure of company performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are provided in addition to and not as a substitute for or superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The only difference between GAAP and non-GAAP results is stock-based compensation expense. Please refer to the press release issued today for a detailed reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. Now, I'd like to turn the call over to Rajesh. Please go ahead. Thank you, Leanne. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining on today's call. I'm pleased to report that the Q1 was another solid quarter with revenues of $35.5 million, representing growth of more than 63% year-over-year and above the high end of our guidance. Coming off of a very strong Q4, we've continued to see increasing order rates for our timing solutions. There are several reasons for SiTime's tremendous year-over-year growth. First of all, we're the only semiconductor company that is solely focused on timing, as we have mentioned a few times. We're also the only company to offer all high-volume timing categories: oscillators, clocks, and resonators. Moreover, we're committed to developing the higher-value products that solve difficult timing problems. We use a systems-level approach that is supported by our deep expertise in MEMS, in analog packaging, and algorithms. As a result, products like Elite and Emerald perform up to 20 times better than our competitors. Customers recognize this focus and the value that we bring to them, and they place their trust in us. As an example of this trust, during Q1, we secured more than 40 design wins for Elite, Emerald, and the Endura product line, which is in comms or communications applications such as 5G, small cells, remote radio heads, and optical modules as well. In aerospace defense applications such as satellite communications, GNSS, and transponders. In each of these applications, the SiTime device was chosen because it solved a very specific problem, and we believe that this is only the start of our journey with these customers. As we have deep technical engagements with key customers, we understand the customer's roadmap, which enables us to develop better, major what we call platform products. As leaders, we also uncover specific opportunities that can be addressed by a rapid release strategy, which we call derivative products, which are simpler modifications of our existing platforms. Driven by more stringent future technical requirements and communications and cloud infrastructure, automotive, and mobile IoT, we plan to expand into higher-value oscillators and clocks over the next three to five years, and we expect to deliver over 100 platforms and derivatives in that timeframe. About a year ago, we reevaluated our pricing strategy and decided to change prices on our lower-margin business, primarily in the applications where we had offered shorter lead times. We've expanded that effort to more applications in 2021, where we'll see the full year benefit of that. As an example, on one of our popular product families, the ASP, or average selling price, increased by 20% from 2020 to 2021. All other gross margin improvement efforts, such as product mix changes, which are in favor of higher ASP products and lower product costs, continue strongly, of course, as well. In the current tight supply chain environment, SiTime's fabless model and product programmability continue to provide significant differentiations. As a reminder, SiTime's products are 100% programmable, and we can be more responsive than our competitors who are reliant on the quartz- based fixed-frequency solutions. Customers are also taking comfort in having a non-overlapping supply chain from SiTime, and many of them have approached us recently to help in their supply chain environments. We have selectively engaged with about 25 key customers where we believe we provide exceptional value and are developing multi-year commitments with them. Also, in anticipation of the rising demand, customers are also placing orders much earlier. In fact, more than half of our bookings in Q1 2021 were for deliveries which were 5 to 12 months out in the future, which gives us unprecedented visibility into 2021 revenue. We believe that as customers experience the benefits of using SiTime technology, they tend not to go back to their older quartz-based solutions, and this results in even more opportunities in the future. From a longer-term perspective and looking at the entire semiconductor industry, I believe that we are in a golden age, and we expect it to continue for the next few years. At SiTime, we believe that we also have a multi-year growth opportunity in timing specifically, as connected devices proliferate in all parts of our lives. In order to pack more features and functionality, these devices need timing chips with higher precision, smaller size, and higher resilience and other features. As the leading provider of high-value timing, SiTime can only stand to gain tremendously from this key trend. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Art to discuss the Q1 results in more detail and provide our outlook for the Q2 of 2021. Art. Great. Thanks, Rajesh. And good afternoon, everyone. So today, I'll discuss Q1 2021 financial results and provide some guidance for the Q2 of 2021. I'll focus my discussion on non-GAAP financial results and refer you to today's press release for a detailed description of our GAAP results, as well as a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results, which excludes stock-based compensation and related payroll tax expense. So, as Rajesh mentioned, the Q1 was another great quarter for us. We had strong year-over-year revenue growth, continued gross margin expansion, and strong year-over-year growth in non-GAAP net income. Revenue for the quarter was $35.5 million, up 63% over the same quarter a year ago, with revenue growth in each of our major market segments. Sales into our mobile, IoT, and consumer segment, which consists of sales into mobile phones, wearable devices, and consumer products, were $22.4 million, up 81% over the same quarter last year. Sales into our industrial, automotive, and aerospace segment, which includes sales into automotive, industrial, medical, aerospace, military, and broad-based sales, were $7.3 million, up 31% year-over-year. And sales into communications and enterprise, which consists of wireless infrastructure, including 5G, data center, and networking, were $5.8 million, up 33% year-over-year. Our largest customer accounted for 37% of sales this quarter. Gross margins continued to expand. Non-GAAP gross margins were 54.1%, up 60 basis points sequentially, and up more than 700 basis points over the same quarter last year. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $15.3 million, comprised of $8.2 million in R&D and $7.1 million in SG&A. This was up from $13.3 million in Q4, as we expanded our workforce by more than 10% this quarter, primarily in R&D, as we continue to invest in advancing our technology and expanding our product portfolio. Non-GAAP net income was $3.8 million, or $0.19 per share, compared to a $2.2 million loss in the same quarter last year. Stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes were $7.4 million, up from $6.2 million in the Q4 due to new employee stock grants and our performance stock-based bonus plan. Our big financial event this quarter was the follow-on stock offering. In February, we sold 1.5 million shares of stock at $127 per share, netting $181.6 million after fees and expenses. MegaChips also sold 1.5 million shares, which increased the public float and liquidity of our stock and reduced their ownership to just under 32%. Trade receivables were $22.2 million, with DSOs of 59 days. Inventory was $15.0 million, up from $12.4 million at the end of Q4, as we ramped production this quarter in anticipation of higher Q2 sales. In regards to cash flow, we generated $6.0 million in positive cash flow from operations. We invested $4.2 million in equipment and assets. We added $181.6 million from our stock offering. And as a result, we ended the quarter with just over $250 million in cash and no bank debt. I'd now like to provide some guidance for the Q2 of 2021. First of all, the trends that are driving the need for high-performance timing solutions continue to drive significant year-over-year revenue growth. Additionally, as Rajesh mentioned, many of our customers are now placing orders up to 5-12 months in advance, which is giving us the best visibility we have ever had. For the Q2, we expect sales to increase 10%-15% sequentially. At the midpoint, that would be about $40 million, or 85% higher than the same quarter last year. Sequential growth will come primarily from comms, enterprise, and industrial markets, while sales into mobile, IoT, and consumer will be essentially flat quarter to quarter from Q1 to Q2. We expect continued gross margin expansion of at least 50 basis points sequentially. Operating expenses will increase due to an expanding workforce. We expect Q2 non-GAAP operating expenses will increase about 10% sequentially to approximately $17 million. Though we have a significant cash balance now, interest rates are low, which means our interest income will be relatively nominal and is expected to be about $50,000 for the quarter. The basic share count in Q2 will be approximately 19.0 million shares, and the dilutive effect of employee RSUs will add approximately 2.0 million additional shares, taking the total expected diluted share count to approximately 21.0 million shares. Stock-based compensation expense is expected to be approximately $7.5 million, and based on this guidance just given, we expect Q2 non-GAAP EPS will be between $0.21 and $0.25 per share. On a slightly different topic, ESG, which stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance, is getting more investor attention these days, and I'd like to make a few comments. First of all, we believe the culture here at SiTime aligns very well with basic ESG principles. We promote an inclusive environment by valuing the contributions of all employees and work to ensure our employees feel seen, heard, valued, and respected. We believe diversity makes us stronger. A diverse workforce supports creativity, problem-solving, and better decision-making. We also believe it's important to minimize the environmental impact of our products and operations to ensure a sustainable future. We are working to enhance our sustainability practices by developing and implementing policies to reduce our carbon emissions and consumption of energy and water. We recently went live with our ESG and corporate governance website, and we encourage interested investors to visit. In summary, our workforce continues to perform extremely well while working from home. Our product portfolio continues to expand with differentiated products that address large and growing markets. We have an enviable list of tier-one customers and now an even stronger balance sheet. We believe 2021 will be a great year for us. And with that, I'd like to turn the call back to the operator for Q&A. At this time, in order to ask a question, press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Tore Svanberg with Stifel, and you're live, Mr. Svanberg. Your next question comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham. Hey, guys. This is Michelle on for Quinn. Congrats on the great results, and thanks for taking the questions. For my first question, I think it's been about a year since your first clock IC solution was launched, your Cascade product. I'm just wondering if you can give us an update on the progress you're making with that product family in terms of design wins or what customer reception has just been like relative to your expectations or whatnot. So just any color there would be helpful. Sure. Our Cascade product line is really intended for our communications product line and enterprise. And in that area, in particular, we have been doing great business with Cascade in the small cell, in the DU or distributed unit, in the edge server market, and also in the SmartNIC cards and fronthaul and midhaul switches. So the names of some of the customers that we have talked about in these areas are, of course, Nokia. We've been involved with Samsung Networks, Intel, Xilinx, Dell, HP Enterprise, Dasan, some of these other customers. So I think we have done really well with that product, and we fully expect to come out with more products in that space as we go forward. Because, as we have mentioned before, we use a companion approach where we get the Cascade product line and other future emerging product lines to join with our oscillator products and basically work as a mini subsystem for our customers, and that's of immense value to them. Great. Thanks. And maybe just one quick one for Art. I think last quarter, there was, we maybe mentioned that the first half of 2021 revenues were probably going to be higher than normal percentage of the annual revenues, that is. So I'm just wondering, as you look out to Q2, do you still or I'm sorry, not Q2, second half, do you still see the first half being a higher than normal percentage of annual revenues, or is there an update to that kind of outlook? And also, if you don't mind, just quickly on the gross margin guidance, did you say expansion sequentially 50 basis points? If you could just clarify that. Yeah. So great questions. I'll start with the latter. Yes, up at least 50 basis points from Q1 to Q2. And also, as I mentioned on the call, our gross margins have expanded really dramatically over the last year. Just to repeat, in Q1, our gross margins were up over 700 basis points over what they were just a year ago in Q1 of 2020. To answer your other question, yeah, we are expecting less seasonality this year than we've seen in past years, and I think that remains to be true. If you look at our sales growth in Q1, that was up 63% over the same quarter last year. And at the midpoint of my guidance, Q2 would be up 85% year-over-year. I expect very nice growth in Q3 and Q4, but the percentages year-over-year will not be as high as what we saw in the first half of the year, primarily because we're just seeing less seasonality. It's not going to be as back-end loaded this year as it was in past years. Got it. Okay. Thanks. That's all for me, and congrats again. Yep. Thanks. Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Alex Vecchi with William Blair. Hi everyone. This is Jay Kong for Alex Vecchi. Congrats on the great quarter. So you discussed 40 design wins, which is up from 30 last quarter. Can you walk us through what's key to help you increase these win rates versus the competition, and how are you expecting that to progress throughout the year? Yeah. I mean, at the highest level, it's the introduction of our new products. Typically, we've announced the Cascade product line, the automotive product line. Those have helped us, and we've maintained traction with Elite, Endura, as well as our Emerald product line. So new product introductions and traction with older products that have been in the market for a while. The second is, I think, an overall shortage situation in semiconductors in general and timing in specific has given us a boost as well. Because while, as I explained in past times, many of our design wins come as a result of higher performance, but I've also maintained that because of our advantages on the business side, which include supply chain benefits, quality, reliability, and a semiconductor supply chain, because of all of these, customers in this tight times have discovered the value proposition around that. And we're certainly expecting and getting customers who value these pieces of it. So I think all in all, it's a combination of our products and some very specific conditions that we bring to bear in the timing market. Thanks for the color. Congrats again on the great quarter. Thank you. Great. Thanks. Up next is Chris Caso with Raymond James. Yes, thank you. Good evening. I wonder if you could expand a little bit on the comments you made in the prepared remarks on pricing and the extent to which you were able to get some higher prices from your customers. Is this a function of new design wins, perhaps raising prices? Are you able to raise prices on existing customers given the environment? Yeah. So thanks. We did take a very close look at some of our lower margin revenue last year and this year, and we basically looked at that and decided that it was time we started to move some of that up into more close to our corporate levels. And so most of these products were in the consumer space, some of them in the mobile space, some of them were in the lower industrial kind of space. So we were able to, as we rolled out our pricing in a very coordinated way with our customers, I think we were able to retain most of them because they saw the value proposition that we had brought. As far as the new business goes, most of our newer products particularly tend to be in the networking, industrial, automotive, enterprise, data center space, and they tend to be higher pricing, as we have discussed anyway, because that's more of a premium part. This was bringing some of our legacy business up to our corporate levels as well. All right. Thank you. As a follow-up, obviously, there are a lot of supply constraints around that you do use foundry for the analog portion of your product, and it does sound like you're getting some good bookings farther out. To what extent are you also seeing supply constraints? Are there any constraints within your manufacturing network which would tend to put a cap on the revenue opportunity for you? Yeah. I think while we haven't had any specific timing constraints and we've been well served by our suppliers like Bosch and TSMC and our OSAT, it is fair to say that we do tend to juggle some of the new business coming in because there is the tightness that is impacting everybody. It has not curtailed any of our revenue or revenue growth, but it does put a little bit extra burden on the operations and sales operations teams in managing the business. I don't think it's anything which is particularly significant. It is onerous, but it doesn't curtail our business anyway. And at this point, we feel pretty good that because of our relationships with our suppliers and because of the fact that we are a net add to their TAM, that we continue to get all the wafers that we need. Got it. Very helpful. Thank you. Great. Thanks, Chris. Your next question comes from the line of Blaine Curtis with Barclays. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question and congrats on the great quarter. Maybe just from a very high level, can you just help us with the June guidance? If 60% of your business is flat, you're obviously then seeing some pretty sharp sequential growth. You mentioned COM, Enterprise, and Industrial. If you could maybe speak to the products or applications that are kind of driving that, it's because it's a very nice acceleration from what you've seen in those segments. Sure. So I'll make one comment on comms and Enterprise in Q1. As Rajesh mentioned, we have worked very diligently to make sure that we don't have any supply constraints on our ability to satisfy our customers. But some of our customers have been challenged to get sufficient parts for their products. We actually had one comms customer in Q1 that could not secure enough parts from one of their other vendors, and that reduced what we were able or what they needed from us in Q1. So our comms Enterprise revenue in Q1, even though it was up 33% year-over-year, it was down just slightly from Q4 because of that. It will come back very strong in the Q2. And it's kind of across the board for us. It's in data center. It's in 5G applications. Basically, all of those areas that drive our comms and Enterprise is kind of across the board. And we're expecting to see a pretty strong uptick from Q1 to Q2. Yeah. And then. Go ahead. Rajesh, I don't know if you'd like to add to that. Yeah. I was just going to say a little bit more color. The data center market, whether it's on the server side or on the switch side alone, is about a $100 million market for us, and we continue to find a lot of design wins in that space. We also find a lot of design wins in the optical module that have been growing. We've mentioned that before in previous earnings calls. And finally, the market for the switches, the fronthaul and backhaul switches, as well as the edge servers, continue to be a very good market for us so far. Great. Thanks. And I just want to ask, you mentioned 25 key customers. I guess are these existing customers? And I guess one. And then I was just kind of curious, in the nature of the multi-year agreements here, is it that they're worried about supply? Or kind of what's the catalyst, I guess, for switching to these multi-year agreements with these customers? Yeah. I think some of them are, in fact, new customers that came to us because they saw the tightness of supply. They had been talking to us or were looking at some products, and then they accelerated those when the tightness of supply started to happen, and in fact, we actually got a lot more than these 25 coming in through the pipeline, but we looked carefully at where we are clearly providing value and where it was not someone who was trying to buy from us on a panic basis and wouldn't be a long-term customer for us, so I think we were pretty diligent in doing that. The second part is that the belief that we have is that this is evenly divided between people who come to us for performance, as we have mentioned in the past, and now increasingly those who are seeing the benefits of diversifying their supply chain away from quartz, which is kind of monolithic and has some choke points which were not very evident before to them. And in recent months with recent events, have become much more evident to our customers that the MEMS or semiconductor-based supply chain is a lot more robust and resilient, not to mention, of course, the quality and reliability. So these are the factors. And as I've mentioned before, once they come to SiTime, they almost never leave SiTime. They almost never leave SiTime. So I think it's a great place to be. And then, maybe just finally for Art, I'm just curious on the OpEx. I guess you're bringing it up kind of commensurate with revenues. Are there particular areas that you're investing in, and that's why it's coming up, and kind of any way to think about the rest of the year? Yeah. So we have been stepping up our OpEx, but that's because revenue has been growing very substantially. We're still pretty much keeping to our model. My guide for Q2, for example, revenue would be up 85% year-over-year, and my OpEx guide would be up, I calculated, 28% year-over-year. So that's well less than half of my top-line growth. But with the higher top-line growth rate, we are hiring. We're hiring primarily in R&D, as I mentioned in my discussion. And that's kind of across the board in R&D. We've hired a number of folks into our MEMS group, a number of folks into our analog group, and a number of folks into our systems group. So we're investing much more heavily, and we think this will pay off going forward by improving our technology, continuing to improve our technology, and expanding our product portfolio. I don't know if Rajesh. Yeah. Specifically, yeah. And very specifically, I mentioned the 100 platforms and derivatives that we intend to offer. I think we have certainly given that a significant boost than in previous times because of the recent successes and growth and the opportunities that we see. Great. Thanks. Thanks, Blaine. Your next question comes from the line of Tore Svanberg with Stifel. Yes. Thank you, Rajesh and Art. Congrats on another great quarter. I apologize for my technical issues before. My first question is on your programmability. How is that helping you manage your own inventories and also help customers increase their resilience in their supply chains? Because obviously, they're probably dealing with very, very extended lead times right now from the discrete companies. So yeah, if you could talk a little bit about how the programmability factor is helping you get some more design wins right now. Yeah. So customers have a couple of things going on. One is that there's the tightness of supply, of course, and so they can't get as much. The second thing which comes together is that they have an unpredictability of supply. In other words, they may not have product, and then they may suddenly have product. So in these times, the programmability very specifically is of help to some of the customers because this is when they urgently tend to need our products, or they were expecting to use our product with X frequency, and they started to get more availability in another product, and so now they wanted our product to be of Y frequency as an example of programmability. So I think that's one way to do it. The second is that, in general, as lead times of other timing products, particularly in the area of quartz, tend to go out even longer than they normally have, customers still find that in spite of the fact that we have increased our lead times, we are still at a relatively reasonable level of lead time advantage. And so they tend to naturally gravitate to that because it's a much more reliable source of supply for them. So I think that our programmability stands us in good stead in these two ways. Great. And as my follow-up, could you just elaborate a little bit on the pricing increase for the one sort of legacy product family? Just trying to understand the rationale there. I mean, did you just see more use cases for it with more customers? So yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So basically, what happened is that, as you know, we've talked in the past about being a premium supply chain vendor and our products delivering exceptional value and therefore being priced at a premium level. We also happen to have other products from, as you said, the legacy, which are not necessarily significantly differentiated across performance. But what we did find is that at this time of tightness, it did make sense for us to have any revenue coming from lower gross margin than what we think it was that our products deserve. So we went out and started increasing prices last year as well as through this year at some of our customers where we think it warranted it. And actually, the response was pretty positive. By and large, most of our customers stayed with us. In fact, we discovered the ability to build longer-term relationships with them because they showed us their appreciation of the support we had given them in the past and the future support by signing long-term contracts with us. Great color. Thank you, and congrats again. Great. Thanks, Tore. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of John Pitzer with Credit Suisse. Yeah. Good afternoon, Rajesh. Art, thanks for letting me ask the questions. Congratulations on the solid results. Rajesh, I'd like to go back to your prepared comments around bookings. I think I heard you say that about half your bookings now are somewhere between five to 12 months in duration, implying pretty good visibility. I was hoping maybe you could put some context around what kind of a normal bookings pattern looks for you, and as you think about the improved visibility, how much of this is just a reflection of sort of the tight supply environment we find ourselves in? How much of it is kind of company-specific demand drivers that just look good as the year unfolds? Yeah. So welcome, John. So we find that in the past, there's two things going on. So the answer to what has been typical isn't as clear for two reasons. One is that our products in the last year and a half have tended to be much more higher-end, which for us means communications and enterprise. So there's that trend going on. Overlay that with the tightness in the supply overall, and then the particular tightness in timing supply. I would just say, though, I would guess to say that our deliveries were more like three to eight months out in the future, and now they're five to 12 months out in the future. I believe that this trend is going to continue for a while, again, because of a macro event, which is, I believe, this tightness will continue for a while, maybe a year and a half, maybe two years. I think that our products will continue to be those that tend to be longer-term and higher value, and I also believe, finally, that even those customers that come to us because of supply chain issues are unlikely to go away, so even though this remains to be seen, we don't have data on this, I would say that I would expect that we maintain this kind of visibility going forward into the future. That's helpful. And then maybe with my follow-up, Art, last quarter, and you're probably going to regret doing this, you were helpful enough to kind of give us a sense of what the largest customer might look like when you guided March, and you got pretty close to that number. Yeah. I know you guided mobile IoT consumers flat sequentially. Can you differentiate between largest customer and other? And the reason why I ask is you exclude the largest customer in March, and you saw really good sequential growth in that business. And I'd be curious, as you answer the question, what drove the strength ex the large customer in March? Yeah. So I can offer some color on that. I expect our largest customer in Q2 will be somewhere less than 25% of revenue. So that's down from 37% in Q1, which means that our consumer IoT, ex our largest customer should see some very nice growth from Q1 to Q2. And let me just add a comment to that. I don't want people thinking that our largest customer is going away by any means. We expect sales to that customer to increase very nicely in the back half of the year as it has in past years. Perfect. Thank you. Sure thing. Your next question comes from the line of Suji Desilva with Roth Capital. Hi, Rajesh. Hi, Art. Congratulations on the progress here. Just a follow-up on the lead time question. Can you guys talk if the extension of lead times and the significant lengthening applies across all the segments equally, or are there some that are particularly extended versus others and market segments? Yeah. I think that they're all pretty tight. They're just very different. I think the consumer segment is pretty tight. I think the IoT segment is pretty tight. The comms enterprise data center is pretty tight. Automotive is very tight. Automotive, as you know, has made all the headlines in the past few months. Probably the one that's not particularly tight, no surprise, is mil-aero, but it still continues so robustly, and it's such a sort of a cranking away kind of business that it's hard to tell. But I would say it's pretty across the board. Okay. And then you talked a lot about consumer and IoT, but the infrastructure side, the 5G buildouts globally, have you seen the pauses or push-outs there affecting you, or perhaps are you new in the builds and the product cycles so it's not as impactful to you? Any color there would be helpful. Thanks. Yeah. I think it's been steady. Remember that when we say comms, when we say 5G, we sometimes use that loosely because it's not really 5G. It's really more about communications, even though 5G is a big portion of it. So I would say that it's a pretty steady rollout. It isn't anything which is a particularly spiky rollout yet, but we do get everything else in the midhaul, in the core, and in the data center. So it's pretty evenly spread for all our products. Okay. That's very helpful. Thanks, Rajesh. Thanks, Art. Sure. Great. Thanks, Suji. There are no further questions, so I will now turn the call back over to Mr. Art Chadwick for any closing remarks. Great. Thank you. Well, that pretty much concludes our conference call today. I want to thank everybody for joining us on this call. We appreciate all of your support, and we hope you have a great day. Thanks again, everyone. Bye now. Thank you.