Greetings. Welcome to SM Energy 's second quarter 2025 financial results and operating results conference Q&A session. At this time, all participants will be in listen-only mode. The question and answer session will follow the presentation. If anyone today should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. Please note that today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'll turn the conference over to Pat Lytle, Senior Vice President of Finance. Pat, you may begin. Thank you, Rob. Good morning, everyone. In today's call, we may reference the earnings release, IR presentation, or prepared remarks, all of which are posted to our website. Thank you for joining us to answer your questions today. On the call this morning, we have our President and CEO, Herb Vogel, COO, Beth McDonald, and CFO, Wade Pursell. Before we get started, I need to remind you that our discussion today may include forward-looking statements and discussion of non-GAAP measures. I direct you to the accompanying slide deck, earnings release, and risk factors section of our most recently filed 10-K, which describes risks associated with forward-looking statements that could cause actual results to differ. Also, please see the slide deck appendix and the earnings release for discussion of forward-looking statements and definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. Also, our second quarter 10-Q was filed this morning. With that, I will turn it over to Herb for brief opening comments. Herb? Thanks, Pat. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Before we get started, I want to make sure that you all took a close look at slide six in the slide deck we posted yesterday afternoon and heard Beth's comments on the prerecorded call. Over the last five years, our growth has been intentional, strategic, and compelling. Slide six shows that since 2020, we have grown both net proved reserves and net production by over 60%, while increasing our oil percentage and production margins. Amazingly, we achieved this growth while share count remained flat, meaning no dilution, and we cut our leverage by more than a full turn from the end of 2020 to where it is today. In other words, we have delivered a step change in scale and de-risked the balance sheet, all while not diluting our shareholders, benefiting per-share metrics significantly. You can attribute this exceptional outcome to date to our team's extensive geoscience, engineering, and advanced analytics experience in unconventional resource development, all hyper-focused on adding shareholder value. We see a future where we can continue to access underappreciated assets, apply our deep technical skills, repeat this level of performance, and grow shareholder value meaningfully. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Rob to take your questions. Thank you. We'll begin conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star one from your telephone keypad, and a confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we pull for questions. Thank you. The first question today comes from the line of Zach Parham with JP Morgan. Please proceed with your questions. Hey, thanks for taking my questions. First, I just wanted to ask on cash taxes. You gave some specific guidance on cash taxes in 2025 post the passage of the tax bill, but how should we be thinking about your cash tax obligations as we go into 2026 and into future years? Morning, Zach. Yes, this is Wade. Good question. At this point, for the foreseeable future, I would assume something similar. If you're looking into 2026, under the new plan and the increased level of deductions that we will be able to achieve, I think our base plan right now looks very similar, depending on commodity prices, of course. If you're asking about years beyond that, assuming those laws stay into effect and assume our spending stays at similar levels, it's going to be a pretty similar result for quite a while. Thanks. My follow-up's on the Uinta. You grew the Uinta pretty significantly quarter- over- quarter in 2Q compared to 1Q. How do you think about Uinta production from here? What's the capacity of that asset over the back half of the year and as we go into 2026? Yeah. Hey, Zach, it's Beth. You know, when you look at our turn-in lines for Uinta, we had a majority of those coming on in the first half of the year, so we came out of the gate really strong. We also had the outperformance of our wells in the quarter that led to the high production. You know, we'll have more of South Texas and Permian coming online in the second half, but Uinta continues to stay strong. We were really excited about what we saw in Q2 and look forward to seeing continued performance and repeatability in that asset going forward. Thanks, Beth. The next question is from the line of Leo Mariani with ROTH MKM. Please proceed with your questions. Yeah, thanks. I wanted to just focus a little bit on some of the additional activity. I think if I read this right, it sounds like you guys are adding an additional 10 net wells to the drilling program for roughly $75 million. Was that the total that got the $75 million? Seems maybe a little high if you're just drilling wells. Seems like you're not completing them, but maybe these are just drills. It sounds like they're also all non-op. Have some of those kind of already happened? Are they hitting in third quarter? Do you expect to see CapEx come down in 4Q? Yeah. Hey, Leo. It's Beth. When you look at the timing of that, we had additional activity pull into Q2. We had the two additional net drill wells and six turn-in lines that came in in Q2. When you look at the overall capital raise that we had in new guidance for the year, it's primarily associated with non-op and better line of sight to those projects. Some of it is acceleration, and some of it is non-operated projects that we know now that we're participating in. High-return ones in the Midland Basin primarily associated with those. Yes, Leo, those don't add any production in 2025. That's all in 2026. Okay. Do you guys expect to see CapEx come down here in the fourth quarter then? I know, obviously, you dropped a lot of the operator rig activity. Yes, Leo, we expect fourth quarter capital to come down. Okay. That's helpful. On the Uinta, obviously, it sounds like well performance has been certainly quite a bit stronger this quarter. You had a lot of wells. It looked like the IP30s were up quite a bit despite shorter laterals. I was hoping you could provide a little bit more color on what drove the improved results. Can you also comment on how well costs are trending? Have you been able to bring the well cost down in addition to seeing better performance? Yes, on both. What I would say is that what we're seeing is our technical expertise combined with that of XCL's former operational execution, and we're seeing capital efficiency really drive costs down there. We showed that also on slide 11, especially as it relates to the conveyor system and where we are now. Costs are coming down there in the Uinta. Also, when you look back on slide 10 and you see the well performance, truly stellar well performance. Our subsurface team worked very well with our completion optimization, our design going forward, and I think you're seeing some of the benefits of that combination. Okay, appreciate it. Our next question is from the line of Oliver Huang with TPH. Please proceed with your questions. Good morning, Herb, Wade, and Beth, and thanks for taking the questions. I wanted to hit on the Uinta Basin first in a little bit more detail. I know we're still waiting for the first fully SM start-to-finish well design. Year to date, I think all these wells thus far were kind of part of the inherited duct backlog from the deal when thinking about what spacing or zones that might have been targeted. Just given how you all have had close to 50 of these wells online in the first half of the year, it's a decent sample size with a handful of months of public data, which all look to be performing better than what we saw from the program last year that your predecessor ran. Just trying to get a sense for when you all look at the data and changes within the program on a year-over-year basis, what are some of the main differences you all would pinpoint as specific drivers for that positive rate of change? Yeah. Thanks, Oliver, for the question. I think, you know, when you look at our top initiatives as we evaluate the Uinta, we're really looking at the entire development of the wine rack. We're looking at landing zone, our co-development strategy within the lower cube, as well as looking and evaluating the upper cube. We continue to extend laterals across the acreage position, and we really look at maximizing capital efficiency. I think when you combine all those things, you see that repeatability in the 22 wells that we put online. Okay. Makes sense. Maybe just a quick follow-up on the trajectory, just thinking through how the program was fairly front-end weighted with respect to CapEx and tills. Just doing some back-of-the-envelope math, it looks like 15% - 20% of your full-year CapEx remains for Q4, roughly 15% of tills. Most of the Uinta oilier wells were very front-end weighted. When we're kind of thinking about just Q4 and Q1, any sort of color that you all could provide on the magnitude of potential rolloffs on oil volumes or any sort of color on the expected shape as we kind of head into 2026? Yeah, Oliver, I think your back-of-the-envelope math is pretty accurate there for fourth quarter, especially on the till counts and what that implies. We're not really going to discuss our plans for 2026 until our normal timing, which is February. Last July, when we announced the Uinta transaction, we said we were going to reduce the rig count, and we're doing that. We're down to six already, and it would be pretty much safe to assume we stick with six rigs for next year, spread pretty evenly across all our assets between South Texas, the Midland Basin, and Uinta. We've kind of flagged that that would generate pretty much flattish BOE production on a little bit less CapEx year- over- year, even without assuming deflation. We're going to look at the plan later in the year, evaluate where we are on commodity prices, and then really work to maximize that free cash flow over two to three years as we usually do. With the commodity price experience that we've had this year, it's just really difficult to figure exactly where things are going to be, is there going to be a tailwind on gas or headwinds on gas, and then on oil, likewise. We'll do our normal program there, and as usual, it'll be focused on free cash flow generation. Okay. Fair enough. Thanks for the time. You bet. Next question is from the line of Scott Hanold with RBC. Please proceed with your question. Yeah, thanks. Certainly, I would focus on the Uinta, and you all had a nice step up in the returns and performance there. My question is, do you think there's some sustainability for that? I know there's going to be general ebbs and flows, but should we level-set things to this was sort of a peak quarter? Or do you expect things could be status quo or even better, moving ahead based on what you know today? Yeah, Scott, I'll start and then hand it over to Beth. You know, we went into the Uinta Basin because we saw all this potential, not just near-term and in the lower cube, but beyond that for massive inventory expansion. What we do see is quite sustainable on a drilling program and the ability to grow inventory. With that, I'll hand it over to Beth for the rest of that. Yeah, I agree. If you're looking specifically at the production this year, and what does that mean moving forward, it's really all timing of our turn-in lines. We have stellar performance. Most of that's weighted toward the front half of the year. As we continue to complete wells throughout the year, we'll still bring on great, just as Herb said, that repeatable performance that we have and sustain our cash flow coming out of the Uinta. Okay. Thanks. My follow-up, this one's probably for Wade. On shareholder returns, as you guys have now a line of sight on hitting your leverage target, would you anticipate being a little bit more, I guess, not cautious, but a little bit more conservative in terms of when you'd flex that, or would you be willing to step in if the opportunity is right sooner than later? What kind of scale would you feel comfortable doing that at? A lot of good questions there, Scott. Thank you. Yeah, we are line of sight. That is a good word. I mean, we're close getting there. We ended the quarter at 1.2 x, really more like 1.1 x if you look at it on a full-year basis for XCL. I think we mentioned in our comments that based on, you know, just using the current commodity prices, we see it happening by the end of the year. We're really bouncing along right there, close to one times the second half of the year. To answer your question, I could see us opportunistically stepping in at some point. As we see stability in the market, we're looking for that also. We've seen some stability in recent weeks. We'll continue to monitor that. I'm talking about oil prices primarily. You could see us stepping in. We have, just to remind everyone, authorization from the board, a $500 million share buyback program. You very well could see us step in there, especially if there's a period of weakness that we want to support. Okay, I appreciate that. Thank you. You bet. Our next question has come from the line of Michael Scialla with Stephens. Please proceed with your questions. Good morning, everybody. One desk on the Uinta. I think you said 90% of this year's program was focused on the lower cube. You've talked about the 17 prospective intervals there. I guess, could you provide an update on how many you've tested thus far? As you look into next year, with this year's program being so much focused on the lower cube, any more plans to delineate some of these other zones next year? Yeah. Thanks, Mike, for that question. When you look back at the historic landing zones that we've seen across, a majority of those have been in the lower cube. There are seven different landing zones within the lower cube itself, and we've had production out of all of those that we're evaluating and taking into account in our geologic model as we set the first SIM, the first well-designed and executed pad that we talked about on the call that will come online in 2026. We also have about 10% of our program associated with the upper cube, and we have several landing zones in there too that we're monitoring to make sure that we pull that in, design the right completion, and make it most capitally efficient and value-adding going forward. Appreciate that, Beth. You had a pretty large beat on production this quarter. You did raise your oil guidance for the year, but I guess a little surprised you didn't push the overall production guidance higher. Could you speak to that at all? What prevented you from taking the total BOE guidance for the year? I think the increase in volumes that we saw this quarter was really due to the mix that we had coming from the strong performance on our Uinta and all of the pops that you saw there. The production profile really has just shifted to earlier in the year. That's shifted forward, if you will. We still see Q3 slightly higher than Q2, and that's reflected in our guidance for Q3. That production has moved forward in time due to our efficiencies and putting more wells online, primarily associated with the outperformance that we've seen in all three of our assets. Sounds good. Thank you. Our next questions are from the line of Michael Furrow with Pickering Energy Partners. Please proceed with your questions. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking our questions. I've just got a follow-up to Zach's cash taxes question earlier. In the OBBA, the capitalization of R&D seems to include a multi-year catch-up and should benefit operators like SM that have, you know, historically had higher levels of R&D. I'm curious if you could add some color to that statement and if SM expects to see some benefits to longer-term cash taxes, particularly from the R&D contribution angle. Yeah, that's a good point. That is definitely part of our conclusions with respect to changing our guidance on cash taxes. We do accumulate a pretty significant amount of R&D every year. Now having the ability to deduct those quicker is definitely part of the impact. That'll be a recurring thing for us. We do incur R&D expenses every year, so that is a component for sure. Great. Appreciate the color. Just a follow-up for me on the Uinta. It looks like operations are humming along. Cadence seems ahead of schedule for the full year of guidance of 50 net completions, completing 41 year to date. Do we consider the 50 completion guidance as sort of a hard target for the year, or would the company consider continuing to run a steady program in the basin and potentially turning into sales a bit more wells than originally contemplated if the efficiencies allow for it? Yeah. Thanks, Michael. This is Beth. I just wanted to point out one thing that Herb mentioned on the call also as it relates to Uinta. We started the year with a double barrel, which is similar to what you might call simul frac in other basins. We started with a double barrel and are down to single barrel as our frac fleet runs very efficiently and catches up with our rigs. We're going to continue to run that frac fleet as efficiently as possible. If that moves more of those turn-in lines into the year, that's great. Right now, we're catching up to the rigs a little bit, and we're seeing those efficiencies. That's just a product of going from the double barrel to the single barrel in our frac. Understood. Thanks for the time. Thank you. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question today, you may press star one from your telephone keypad. The next question comes from the line of Tim Rezvan with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions. Good morning, folks, and thank you for taking my questions. I'm not sure if this is for Beth or Herb. The release and the prepared comments repeatedly sort of reiterated the importance of logistics and optimizing takeaway out of the Price River Terminal. I was curious if you could be a little more specific about what was done and if that, if you view that more a reliability issue, or could we see a potential uplift to realizations as you look to maybe get more Uinta barrels on rail? Thanks for any color on that. Thank you, Tim. That gets in the details of the rail transport. I'll hand that one over to Beth. There are a lot of great opportunities in front of us there, which is pretty exciting to see. We anticipated some, but it's probably even better than we thought. Yeah. What I would say is that our team had to respond to that increase in production growing faster. As a result, we sold, of course, we maximized, and we said this before, we maximized as many barrels as possible to the Salt Lake City refineries, and we were able to do that. We were able to work with our team at Price River Terminal, as well as our railroad logistics team, to move. We just moved more cars, and they did an amazing job moving the barrels in and out of that terminal, and we hit record volumes. It was a collective team effort across our infrastructure partners, as well as our operations team. Okay. We shouldn't think of this as a sort of marketing strategy change. This is just good execution? Yes, exactly. Okay. I appreciate that context. As my follow-up for Herb, you know, in the past, you've been pretty cautious on natural gas, and you've allocated capital, I guess the board has, accordingly. I know the last time I spoke to you in person about this, it was December. You were cautious on gas, and it feels like we've had several price cycles since last December. I'm curious, are you getting more constructive on gas as 2026 approaches, or sort of what's the kind of internal view, given the volatility and the export outlook? Yeah, Tim, it's a great question. Wade always reminds me, if you're going to forecast, forecast often. I would say that we're just cautious on gas because of the ability to develop supply fairly quickly. We've really been watching how does the market perform through the shoulder months? We're really looking for sustained price signals at a higher level. We even had a two-handle earlier in the year, so we're just cautious. We think there's going to be a day we're looking at the structural demand changes between LNG and the data centers. When we see those really come along, that the turbines are available for them to create that demand, then we would be a little bit less cautious on the gas side and maybe lean in a little bit more. Right now, it's pretty much coming out as we kind of expected, which is supply does respond to market signals. We feel like we've got a great plan. Oil has turned out a bit better than we expected from April and May, and it's actually right at our budget for the year. I don't know how that'll continue through the end of the year, but we didn't see a reason to change our plan to respond to the shorter-term gas price signal. Obviously, there's been a little bit of erosion, unfortunately, in that one. We are happy to hedge gas in the out years. Yeah. Okay. Thanks. Yeah, we share that caution. I appreciate the insights. The next questions are from the line of David Deckelbaum with TD Cowen. Please proceed with your questions. Thanks, everyone, for taking my questions this morning. I did want to follow up just on the marketing and the Uinta. Just given the wider basis this quarter, particularly with the higher production levels, what is the outlook for basis in the back half of the year and then heading into next year as you continue to ramp the asset? Yeah. David, asking about basis for Uinta is a bit challenging because the rail volumes are sold at the refinery locations, and those can vary, you know, from, call it, Houston being most of them, and the markers there versus in Salt Lake, where we sell at the more or less the wellhead or the tank. I'll let Beth answer, give it a little more granularity around that. It's not like a single basis market that you'd look at in the Permian or other markets. Yeah, I totally agree with you, Herb. You know, our marketing team just continues to work with different purchasers as we see that demand for our product continue to increase. We look for the highest realization that we can have across. Of course, the transportation cost to get us to Salt Lake City is lower than railing it to Houston and to the Gulf Coast. We continue to look at what's the best margin and best return. That's what our marketing team focuses on on a monthly basis. We'll continue to do that and optimize as best as possible. Appreciate it. I was asking for a little bit more color on the increase in non-operated budget this year. Is that mostly a function of catch-up in activity, just given commodity signals that are out there? Are these efficiency gains that you're seeing on the non-operated side as well in terms of just drilling and completion times? David, I'll start that and then turn it over to Beth. We are sort of unique this year. When we put the budget out there in February at $1.3 billion, we noted that we did not include non-op because it wasn't clear exactly what the non-op program would be from a couple of operators. That was exacerbated with the uncertainty in commodity prices, particularly after April. Given that, we didn't include it, but we said we'd tell you how much we were spending each quarter. Now it's a clear outlook. We also have the ability to potentially adjust that program with the different non-operators. We've dialed in what we think they're going to do and how they're going to execute, and we just brought that all in for the full year. Beth, you want to add anything on that one? No, nothing really to add. We just have better line of sight of what those projects are, and we participated in them because they have very strong returns. Appreciate it, guys. Thank you. At this time, we've reached the end of the question and answer session. I'll now turn the call over to Herb Vogel for closing remarks. Thanks, Rob. Thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to seeing a number of you at upcoming events. Have a great day. Ladies and gentlemen, this will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.