It is now my pleasure to introduce Mark Pogharian, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin. Thank you, operator. Good morning. I am pleased to welcome you to The Simply Good Foods Company earnings call for the fourth quarter and full year ended August 28th, 2021. Joe Scalzo, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Todd Cunfer, Chief Financial Officer, will provide you with an overview of results, which will then be followed by a Q&A session. The company issued its earnings release this morning at approximately 7:00 A.M. Eastern Time. A copy of the release and the accompanying presentation are available under the Investors section of the company's website at www.thesimplygoodfoodscompany.com. This call is being webcast and an archive of today's remarks will also be available. During the course of today's call, management will make forward-looking statements that are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. The company undertakes no obligation to update these statements based on subsequent events. A detailed listing of such risks and uncertainties can be found in today's press release and in the company's SEC filings. Note that on today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe will provide useful information to investors. Due to the company's asset-light, strong cash flow business model, we evaluate our performance on an adjusted basis as it relates to EBITDA and diluted EPS. Additionally, adjusted results exclude the mark-to-market effect of the treatment of the company's private warrants. We have included a detailed reconciliation from GAAP to adjusted items in today's press release. We believe these adjusted measures are a key indicator of the underlying performance of the business. The presentation of this information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to today's press release for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Joe Scalzo, President and Chief Executive Officer. Thank you, Mark. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Today, I'll recap Simply Good Foods' fourth quarter results and provide you with some details on the performance of our brands. Todd will discuss our financial results in a bit more detail, and we'll wrap it up with a discussion of our outlook before opening it up to your questions. Despite the challenging environment throughout fiscal 2021, our business accelerated in the second half of the year, with both of our brands generating nice gains. We executed well and exceeded our plan as net sales surpassed $1 billion in fiscal 2021. The diversification of our business provides us with multiple ways to win in the marketplace. We're particularly pleased with our growth in 2021 across brands, key customers, and products. New product launches were successful, and our innovation pipeline is strong and focused on new formats that give us increasing access to new snacking occasions. Looking back on the year, our entire supply chain team performed well in a challenging external environment. We responded quickly to the changing environment to minimize the effect on our business, customers, and consumers. The collaborative work of our team with suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors enabled us to service our retail and e-commerce customers, as well as expand gross margin in an increasingly inflationary period that grew more challenging as the year progressed. As many of our U.S. food group peers have discussed, the cost and service challenges during the past 6-9 months related to such things as procurement, labor, and transportation will most likely continue throughout the coming year. Importantly, the price increase we announced in June that was effective September 12th provides us with a significant offset against these cost headwinds. Our asset-light, outsourced business model has proven to be a competitive advantage in these difficult times. Importantly, despite volatility in both demand and supply, our margins have been stable and our cash flow steady and sufficient to support future growth. Lastly, I want to recognize our employees and leadership team who have performed superbly while operating remotely. They executed well against our plans amid an uncertain operating environment that enabled us to make investments in our brands and our organization to position us to deliver sustainable sales and earnings growth as consumers and the economy continue to recover from the pandemic. We had a solid fourth quarter with net sales up 16.9%. As expected, workplace mobility was similar to last quarter, and growth was relatively in line with our expectations. Improvements in consumer mobility and shopper traffic versus last year's COVID restrictions resulted in favorable product and customer mix, and combined with favorable trade promotion more than offset supply chain cost inflation. As a result, fourth quarter gross margin increased 60 basis points versus the year ago period. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter increased 30.9% to $48.5 million, primarily due to the solid sales growth, favorable trade promotion, and G&A cost controls. This more than offset higher marketing investments and incentive compensation. Total Simply Good Foods Q4 retail takeaway increased 18.7% in the U.S. measured channels of IRI, MULO, and convenience stores. With no meaningful change in workplace mobility, retail sales were about the same as last quarter. Throughout the pandemic, we've executed well and remain committed to doing the right things over the long term for our business, our customers, and our consumers. In the first half of fiscal year 2021, the nutritional snacking category declined low single-digits due to COVID-19 driven movement restrictions. In the second half of the year, the category rebounded and increased about 24% as shopper traffic increased versus the year ago period. Simply Good Foods' performance outpaced the category in the first half of the fiscal year and was relatively in line with the category in the second half. Importantly, our brands gained share in their respective sub-segments of weight management and active nutrition across all time frames during the year. The active nutrition segment of the category, which includes Quest, increased 35% in the second half of the fiscal 2021. As it has done all year, Quest outperformed the segment and was up 44.5% over the same period. In the second half of the year, the weight management segment was up about 8%. Atkins outperformed the segment with retail takeaway up 12%. We're extremely pleased with our e-commerce performance in the fiscal year. Full year retail takeaway of 40% exceeded measured channel growth. As expected, with brick and mortar shopper traffic increasing in the second half of the year, e-commerce point of sale moderated and was similar to measured channel retail takeaway growth. Atkins Q4 U.S. retail takeaway in measured channels increased 8.7%. Growth in total buyers and increasing shopper trips, particularly in the mass channel, along with improved consumer mobility, resulted in growth across all forms and key retail channels. In the quarter, bars and shakes increased about 3% and 11% respectively. Confections Q4 retail takeaway increased 8.9%, benefiting from at-home snacking usage occasions and recent innovation. We're pleased with Atkins' e-commerce performance. Amazon, Atkins' second largest customer, Q4 retail takeaway increased low teens on a percentage basis versus the year ago period. Total Atkins e-commerce point of sale in the quarter was similar to measured channels. Atkins buyer growth remained strong, up double digits for the quarter and the year. Buy rate remained below historic levels by mid-single-digits due to the high correlation between consumption of Atkins bars and being at work. Therefore, the improvement in Atkins buy rate remains the single biggest opportunity for the brand. Let me now turn to Quest, where fourth quarter retail takeaway increased 34.9% in the measured IRI MULO C-store universe and outpaced the category. Growth was driven by the increase in household penetration, improving shopper traffic, a rebound in bars, and success of new product forms. Quest bars retail takeaway in the quarter increased 23.9%, more than 50% greater than the segment growth rate. Recall Quest bars are about 60% of total Quest retail sales. The snackier portion of Quest products continued to do well and increased 105% in the quarter, driven by continued strong performance of chips, cookies, and confections. We continue to see robust chips demand as we manage supply within our network. We have taken actions to ensure there are no disruptions at retail and have dialed back trade promotions and programming on these items. As we stated last quarter, we'll be increasing chip supply during this fiscal year. We had another good quarter of growth across all key channels. We were particularly pleased with the increased foot traffic of both mass and convenience stores. Combined, the mass channel and C-store universe represents about 40% of Quest sales. In Q4, POS growth in these important channels was up about 40% and 50%, respectively. Quest e-commerce business, nearly 25% of total Quest U.S. sales, continues to do well with Q4 retail takeaway up 30%. Our business at Amazon remains strong and growth was solid across all major forms. In this fiscal year, we anticipate that marketing will increase in line with sales growth. A new Atkins Rob Lowe advertising campaign is beginning to air. We'll be advertising across all forms with messaging focused on bars are back and taking a healthier approach to life. I'm very excited to announce that in the fiscal year, Quest, in addition to their digital marketing efforts, will be on air with television advertising for the first time in the brand's history. The fun campaign focused on four individuals, an unheralded NFL and WNBA rookie, as well as two working professionals who changed careers to pursue their passion. Common theme is that they're all fueled by athlete-worthy nutrition in pursuit of their own personal quests. Our marketing and advertising will also support our new product launches, some of which you see on this slide. We have a strong innovation pipeline, and in the fiscal year, have a good balance of new products across both brands and all forms. In summary, we're pleased with our fourth quarter results. As we look to fiscal 2022, we are positioned well to build on our momentum and deliver solid net sales and adjusted EBITDA growth, which isn't predicated on any meaningful change in workplace mobility. We expect that both brands will have a solid start to the fiscal year with a growth in the first half of the year, stronger than the second half as the latter period has more difficult year-ago comparisons. As I discussed earlier, we have a good balance of innovation and advertising in place that we believe should generate retail and consumer excitement. We continue to expect supply chain cost inflation will be a significant headwind in the year. Pricing and cost savings initiatives are in place to mitigate this impact. We're executing well against our plans and delivering on our financial objectives with flexibility to invest in the business as a path to increasing shareholder value. Now I'll turn the call over to Todd, who will provide you with some greater financial details. I'll then hand our prepared remarks with greater details and assumptions related to our outlook. Todd? Thank you, Joe, and good morning, everyone. I will begin with a review of our net sales. Total Simply Good Foods' fourth quarter net sales increased 16.9% to $260 million. The core North America business contributed 17.1 percentage points to total company growth, driven primarily by Atkins and Quest volume across major forms and channels. Net price realization in Q4 was a slight benefit, driven by lower trade promotion. Our core international business was a 2.1 percentage point benefit to sales growth, driven by strong gains in Australia for both Atkins and Quest. The SimplyProtein brand divestiture and the European business exit were a combined 2.3 percentage point headwind. Moving on to the other P&L items. Gross profit was $104.5 million, an increase of 18.6% versus last year. Gross margin of 40.2% increased 60 basis points versus the year ago period. As expected, supply chain inflation was a headwind this quarter. However, it was more than offset by the previously mentioned lower trade promotion, as well as favorable product and customer channel mix. As Joe discussed, we anticipate significant supply chain inflation in fiscal 2022 due to higher costs related to raw materials, packaging, and logistics. The price increase that went into effect last month, along with cost-saving initiatives, should largely offset these cost pressures, barring a significant step-up in cost inflation from current levels. Adjusted EBITDA increased 30.9% to $48.5 million due to the higher sales and cost control. Selling and marketing expense increased $6.3 million, driven by incremental brand building investments on both Atkins and Quest. G&A expense increased $1.2 million as higher incentive compensation was partially offset by lower corporate expense and Quest acquisition synergies. This excludes fourth quarter fiscal 2021 charges of $3.3 million related to Quest integration cost, restructuring expenses, stock-based compensation, and non-core legal expense. Moving to other items in the P&L, interest expense declined $1.7 million to $7.2 million due to the paydown of the term loan. In the fourth quarters of 2020 and 2021, the non-cash, non-tax deductible charge related to the remeasurement of our private warrant liabilities was $51.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively. The income tax rate was 32.7%. This includes a 5.5 percentage point impact related to the non-cash, non-deductible $5.5 million loss on the fair value change of private warrant liabilities. Net income in Q4 was $18.2 million versus a loss of $39.3 million in the year ago period. Full year results were as follows. Net sales increased 23.1% to $1.005 billion, driven by the acceleration of our business in the second half of the year. Gross profit was $409.8 million, an increase of 26.3%. Gross profit in the prior year was affected by a non-cash $7.5 million inventory purchase accounting step-up adjustment related to the Quest acquisition. Recall the non-cash inventory purchase accounting step-up impacted full year 2020 gross margin by 90 basis points. Excluding this amount, gross profit was $331.8 million last year, and gross margin was 40.6%. Full year fiscal 2021 gross margin of 40.7% increased 10 basis points versus the year ago period. Adjusted EBITDA increased 34.7% to $207.3 million, primarily due to the higher gross profit. Selling and marketing expenses increased 19.5% to $112.9 million. The increase was driven by higher brand building initiatives and the full year impact of Quest. G&A expenses increased about 11% or $9 million due to higher incentive compensation and the inclusion of Quest. This excludes charges of $15.5 million related to Quest integration cost, restructuring expenses, stock-based compensation, and non-core legal expense. Moving to other items in the P&L, combined interest income and interest expense was about $31.5 million, about the same as the year ago period. Note that the cash savings from debt paydown during the year was partially offset by non-cash amortization expense of deferred financing. The income tax rate was 49.4%. This includes a 22.3 percentage points impact related to the non-cash, non-deductible $66.2 million loss on the fair value change of private warrant liabilities. Barring an increase in the tax rate by federal or state authorities, we anticipate the full year fiscal 2022 tax rate to be similar to last year, around 27%. Net income for the full year was $40.9 million versus $65.6 million in the year ago period. The decline of $24.8 million is primarily due to the remeasurement of the private warrant liabilities. Turning to EPS, fourth quarter reported EPS was $0.19 per share diluted, compared with an EPS loss of $0.41 per share diluted for the comparable period of 2020. In fiscal Q4 2021, we recorded a non-operating non-cash charge of $5.5 million due to the change in fair value of the outstanding private warrants. This was about $46 million lower than last year. Depreciation and amortization expense was $4.7 million, similar to the year ago period, and costs associated with Quest integration and restructuring were $0.8 million, $4.6 million lower versus last year. Adjusted diluted EPS, which excludes these items, was $0.29, an increase of $0.09 versus the year ago period. Note that we calculate adjusted diluted EPS as adjusted EBITDA less interest income, interest expense, and income taxes. Full year reported EPS was $0.42, while full year adjusted diluted EPS was $1.26 versus $0.91 in the year ago period. Note that the calculation of adjusted diluted EPS in the Q4 and full year period assumes fully diluted shares outstanding of 102.4 million and 101.5 million shares respectively, versus 97.8 million and 97.4 million under GAAP. The difference versus GAAP is due to the exclusion of the private warrants in fully diluted shares outstanding under GAAP due to the private warrants being classified as a liability on our balance sheet. Please refer to today's press release for an explanation and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures. Moving to the balance sheet and cash flow. In fiscal 2021, the company paid down $150 million of its term loan, and at the end of the year, the outstanding principal balance was $456.5 million. In the fourth quarter, the company generated about $41 million of cash, resulting in full year cash flow from operations of $132 million. Note that this is impacted by higher levels of inventory as we're carrying a bit more given the growth of our business as well as the need for higher safety stocks. As of August 28, 2021, the company had cash of $75.3 million and the trailing 12-month net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio was 1.8x. Capital expenditures for the full year were $5.9 million, driven primarily by equipment for our new warehouse. Fiscal 2022 capital expenditures are expected to be similar to last year. Depreciation and amortization for the full year was $18.2 million. We anticipate GAAP interest expense to be about $25 million, including non-cash amortization expense related to the deferred financing fees. I would now like to turn the call back to Joe for closing remarks. Thanks, Todd. In fiscal 2022, we'll build on our momentum and expect to deliver solid net sales and adjusted EBITDA growth. We're confident in our business as both Atkins and Quest have strong advertising, marketing, and innovation plans in place to drive growth. Looking at the key metrics for the full fiscal 2022, assuming no meaningful change in workplace mobility, we expect net sales to increase 8%-10% versus last year. This includes a one percentage point headwind related to the European business exit. We expect supply chain cost inflation in the fiscal year and anticipate the gross margins will be modestly lower versus the year ago period. The price increase that went into effect last month and cost savings initiatives should largely offset these cost pressures, barring a significant step-up in cost inflation from current levels. Marketing expense is expected to increase in line with sales growth, and G&A leverage should result in an increase of adjusted EBITDA slightly greater than the net sales growth rate. The decline in interest expense should result in an increase of adjusted diluted EPS greater than the adjusted EBITDA growth rate. We anticipate that the first half of the year will be stronger than the second half of the year from a growth rate standpoint, as the year-over-year comparisons are more difficult as we proceed through the year. Turning to the first quarter, we expect net sales growth to be similar to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021. Supply chain cost inflation will be a headwind in the quarter. However, due to existing raw material coverage, as well as the price increase and cost savings initiatives, gross margins should be relatively flat versus prior year. Supply chain cost inflation is expected to be a greater headwind for the balance of the year. As we emerge from the challenges of COVID-19, our business is stronger and our organization is more capable. As such, we remain confident in our short and long-term growth prospects. We are executing against our strategies that position us to deliver on our financial objectives with the ability to invest in our business as a path to increasing shareholder value over the long term. We appreciate everyone's interest in our company, and we're now available to take your questions. Operator? Thank you. We will now be conducting a question- and- answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. The confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star key. One moment, please, while we poll for your questions. Our first questions come from the line of Jason English with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your questions. Hey, good morning, folks. Thanks for slotting me in and congrats on a great year. Two questions. First on service levels capacity, you referenced chips being a bit capacity constrained. Can you give us some quantification of how much that's holding you back and when you expect the capacity to be back online or, sorry, not back online, but expanded to be able to meet the demand? Also related, can you walk through the situation across some of your other categories? Obviously, there's a lot of service level disruptions in the industry. Give us a status of where you stand with available capacity and service levels in things like bars and shakes, et cetera. Yeah, I'll start off with chips. We did pull back on promotional activity on chips in the fourth quarter. That's part of the reason why we have favorable price realization. We were tight on chips and peanut butter cups in Q4. Going into this year, that has been resolved. We're actually in a much better position on both of those products. We feel really good about the ability to service our customers this year. Jason, answering your question regarding kind of other categories. There's no one single issue in our supply chain, beyond what Todd just covered. We're experiencing episodic kind of discontinuities in our supply chain that create a bullwhip effect from a service level. You kind of deal with those on a case-by-case basis. Nothing really different than I think everybody's experiencing right now in the sector where service levels are challenged as you deal with an ingredient not showing up or a co-man not being able to staff a shift. We're dealing with those things pretty much every day. Yeah. It makes sense. It sounds like nothing too serious. Second question, leverage now at below 2x Quest integration effectively complete. What is your acquisition appetite now in light of those conditions, and what are you seeing in the marketplace? Anything interesting at reasonable valuations? We're always hungry, and we obviously have the capacity now to look at assets. The market is busy, so we keep busy looking at those assets. As we've kind of explained externally to folks, we like things in our aisle, we like staying in our category because we understand the category. It fits our supply chain, it fits our selling capability. The first screen for us is always how strong is the brand? How well do we understand the consumer targets? Do we think there's opportunity to accelerate innovation and marketing communication to build the brand? We're staying pretty busy right now and we'll be patient to find the right thing as we always are. Yep, good to hear. Thanks a lot. I'll pass it on. Thank you, Jason. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Chris Growe with Stifel. Please proceed with your questions. Hi, good morning, and I'll add my congratulations as well. Nice quarter, nice outlook there. If I could ask first in relation to Quest and just the kind of how the demographic profile, if you will, that user, is that different from Atkins? Kind of then what you expect as mobility improves for active nutrition and for weight management as that hopefully happens throughout fiscal 2022. Yeah, the target audience. The interesting thing, Chris, I think you already know this. The interesting thing is the kind of the macronutrient, kind of the nutritional philosophy of. On Quest, it majors in protein because of its active consumer benefit, kind of minors in low carb and low sugar, where Atkins, with a weight management benefit, majors in low carbs and low sugar and kind of minors in protein. For the most part, the nutritional profiles are very similar. The consumer benefits and the consumer targets are very different. On Quest, it's about being active and fueling your ability to be active. It tends to be younger, tends to be fitter, tends to be more physically active. Think of the target audience, adults under 35. Atkins tends to be, got a little bit of weight to lose, tends to be a little bit older. Both groups demographically, financially a little bit better, a little bit better educated, but tends to have a little bit of weight to lose on Atkins and tends to be older, kind of over 35. Very little overlap between the brands. As you look through the year, Yeah, go ahead, sorry. Yeah. What was your second question? If we think mobility improves- Yes How will it affect our brands? Interestingly enough, we've seen Quest accelerate during the seconf half of the year. Even the Quest bar business has done extremely well. Part of that is channel development. C-store foot traffic is better. Amazon is the largest customer of Quest. The business has been channel benefited, but we're seeing even the bar business start to accelerate. Atkins, we're really encouraged by the growth. Second half growth was around 12% on an absolute level, kind of the third and fourth quarter consumption was about the same. The rate has a lot to do with what happened last year. The composition of Atkins is encouraging. Buyer growth for the year up double-digit, and what's been holding Atkins back has been the buy rate, which is kind of down mid-single-digits. Right? In doing our analysis on Atkins, we understand being at work is an important driver to snacking occasions and has been holding down buy rates. Yeah. We didn't build this into our assumptions on our business, but if mobility improved, we would expect to see upside on our business, and in particular on Atkins, and in particular on bars. Okay. That was very helpful, color. Thank you. All right. Just a quick follow-up and, or I guess I'll add a question around shelf resets and shelf space and I guess there have been some shelf resets. What you're seeing right now from a high level and as you look at the shelf set here for your brands? Yep. I'll talk a little history first. We saw good growth on both brands in the last fiscal year. Shelf sets are happening. The ones that happen in the fall are happening as we speak. We expect it to be pretty positive for us. As we've said pretty consistently, the new product pipeline on both brands is pretty good. We would expect pretty good performance there. I would also say retailers have relearned the importance of large brands to drive category consumers to the category and to the aisle. We see them kind of focusing, in general, focusing on larger, more important brands to keep their aisles healthy and keep their categories healthy. We're benefiting from those tailwinds. That seemed to work well this past year, yes. Thank you. Okay. That's great. I appreciate your time this morning. All right. Thanks, Chris. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Wendy Nicholson with Citi. Please proceed with your questions. Hi. Two questions. First, short term, do you think there's any need for more pricing? It's great that the pricing you took in June has gone through, but do you think that there's been sufficient either commodity or freight inflation that you need to take more? Second question, longer term, I know you talked about favorable operating leverage as enabling adjusted EBITDA to grow faster than gross profit, but you've been able to reduce SG&A now for, I think, three years in a row as a percentage of sales, and I'm wondering how much further you have to go. You're doing a great job advertising more, so how much more fat is there in G&A before you start to cut into muscle from a productivity perspective? Thanks. Yeah. I'll take the first one. From a pricing gross margin perspective, first I'll just start off and say we're super proud of our ability to expand gross margins by 60 basis points in Q4 and 10 basis points for the full year, just given this supply chain environment that's out there right now. Second, we saw the inflation coming. We priced very aggressively to manage that inflation and feel really good about the execution of that by our sales force. Commodities are not slowing down. To be frank, we thought when we took the price increase, we might see some leveling off, especially in our second half of the year. We're not seeing that yet. We're still hopeful we're going to see that, but some commodities are slowing down, some are still growing at accelerated rates. Right now, we feel good about the guidance we've given. We don't feel like we need to do any additional pricing. If we do see some modest increase in our cost assumptions, I think we can manage that through trade expense, pulling back there a little bit. If we see an acceleration beyond what our expectations are, all levers are in play. We will price if we have to. Regarding the SG&A leverage, I would say that there's two reasons why we're getting so much leverage right now. One is the Quest integration and the synergies we got from that. Obviously, we reduced some headcount with the combined companies. We've got some great synergies that we've executed almost fully at this point. That has helped. Second is just the growth in the business. When you're growing 10%, 15%, 20% top line, and G&A's only growing maybe 4% or 5%, you get some significant leverage. I don't see us pulling back on absolute dollars in G&A, but I think we'll continue to get leverage in our P&L as the business accelerates. Got it. That sounds great. Wendy, this is Joe. I just want to add a little bit of color to what Todd said. He's being modest. His team has done a phenomenal job of seeing cost inflation soon enough, and estimated it well enough that it put us in a position to take what was a pretty aggressive price increase in September. We don't see the need to price again. In a mid to upper single-digit pricing, we feel like we're in very good shape through the fiscal year. We would have to see a significant acceleration of commodity cost inflation relative to where it is right now in the second half of the year to even think about pulling that lever, we frankly think that's a relatively low probability. Really, congratulations to Todd's team. Part of our success has been seeing it early enough and not being too optimistic that it's not going to be too bad. We took a very aggressive cost inflation point of view that compelled us to take some aggressive pricing in the marketplace. That sounds fantastic and very rare among your peers, so definitely congratulations on that front. Just as a follow-up, you did talk about lower levels of promotion, and to the extent you see an increase in mobility, and you're eager to remind those people that they need to buy either Atkins or Quest as they go back to work, what type of step up in your promotional spending or promotional activity do you have embedded in your forecast for fiscal 2022? Or how much flexibility do you have to step up that promotional activity? We tend to always lean in in the first half of the year, believing that the sales will come and that we'll have backend room to spend. We're leaning into our marketing programming as we speak, and we'll continue to do that through January and February. Terrific. Thanks very much. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Steve Powers with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your questions. Hey, thanks guys. You mentioned earlier in the conversation with Chris some of the successes, particularly around Quest, that you've had winning occasions that may be less tied to mobility than maybe would've been the assumption in the past. I'm assuming particularly around things like chips and cookies. I was hoping you could just talk about how that experience may be influencing your decisions around R&D prioritization and whether you see more opportunity now to, in effect, cultivate more of those occasions that are independent of consumers being on the go or if that's not how you're thinking about it? Our focus on what Mark has coined as the snackier portion of our portfolio was underway before we acquired Quest and accelerated under the phenomenal R&D team led by Jeremy Ivie. We've had a focus on it, and the reason for it is its incremental use occasions and need states to bars and shakes. We knew that from Atkins because we had a really big and very strong confection business from the earliest days, and now we have a cookie business and a chip business and a growing confection business on Quest. So we kind of understood that those would be incremental consumption occasions. Along comes COVID and then we learned that, wow, a lot of bar consumption is, in particular on Atkins, is consumed at work and in transit. We were a little fortunate in that our diversification by form and the additional need states and use occasions became a nice offset to our bar business. By the way, we're not de-emphasizing our bar business. We're emphasizing the opportunity to grab new use occasions through other forms, and you should expect us to continue to do that. We'll continue to innovate in bars because it's a big and important portion of our business. Great. You mentioned leaning into advertising in the first half of the year, and you talked about the presentation about some of the initiatives both in Atkins and now Quest. Can you just maybe elaborate on what you're hoping to achieve, especially on the Quest side of that and if it ties into what we were just talking about in terms of the broadening of those occasions? This category is under-penetrated and the marketing challenge, pretty much regardless of the brand you're running, is to grow household penetration and bring more buyers in. I have 8 years of experience with Atkins. The single biggest correlation to growth has been our ability to grow buyers. We always are focused on how to do that. In the case of Atkins, it's a high brand awareness brand. Virtually everybody The challenge with Atkins was to change their point of view of what they do. The marketing efforts are all built around that, the repositioning of the brand away from a programmatic weight loss brand into a low-carb lifestyle weight management expert. I think we've done a pretty good job of doing that. We feel really good about the growth prospects. In the case of Quest, big brand, growing fast, still relatively modest brand awareness. Over the last few years, people have met the brand by showing up at the shelf and finding really great products that they've tried. Our opportunity on Quest is to drive brand awareness, shape people's point of view about what the brand is about, which our new campaign does, and in doing so, you create pressure at the top of the funnel. I create brand awareness, drives brand consideration, accelerates trial and repeat. The same strategy, you got to invest to drive buyer penetration, but two different marketing challenges. One is about changing people's points of view about what they thought about the brand. The other is introducing them to the brand. We've got marketing efforts and marketing investment designed to do those two things. Okay. That's awesome. Thanks, Joe. If I could just squeeze one more in, just going back, Jason asked about the initiatives to add progressive capacity in snacks. I guess just maybe you could just give us a little bit of a sense of the pacing of that through FY 2022, then, where you can kind of expect your theoretical capacity to sit starting in FY 2023 relative to where we've been at the FY 2021 run- rate. Thank you. Yeah. I'll kick it off and then I'll turn it over to Todd, who's been closer to it. The first thing I would say is our challenges on chips and peanut butter cups are because the consumer response far exceeded our expectations on both. We did not go into the marketplace believing we were going to have a supply challenge. This is not about a supplier falling short on what they said they were going to provide us. This is about us not seeing the consumer response to what would've been two really great products. On chips last year, as we moved through the year, every time we got more supply, we absorbed it with demand. We were not able to build inventory. We weren't able to keep up with service. Knowing that changes in capacity take some time, we slowed demand down to build inventory so we could service the business at what is an appropriate level. I'll turn it over to Todd. He can talk to you about the moves that we're making to add capacity on chips as we speak. Yeah. Again, both on chips and cups, as we talked about earlier, we were short or very tight on supplies as we got into Q4. That is largely behind us at this point. We've added capacity on both products in the last month or so. We're actually in pretty good shape right now for FY 2022. We actually have more capacity coming on at the end of this year and the beginning of FY 2023 on chips and cups and some other products. I think we're in pretty good shape for this year, and then as we get into FY 2023, we'll actually have expanded capacity to grow the business. Okay. Thanks to you both. Appreciate it. Sure. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Jon Andersen with William Blair. Please proceed with your questions. Good morning, everybody, and congratulations on a great year. I wanted to ask a little bit about household penetration or come back to that because, as you said, Joe, it's, I think, the highest correlation with the growth, particularly for the Atkins brand. Where do you sit today on household penetration for the two brands? Household penetration growth has been strong, to your point, up double digits this year. Are you seeing strong growth on both of the brands? Who are these new consumers that you're attracting? Is it the snackier consumer based on the kind of innovation and occasions that you're capturing? Any commentary around that, kind of the current state of household penetration, the growth and the complexion of that growth in household penetration. Thanks. All right. You're talking about the thing I don't sleep about all the time, right, which is where are they going to come from and who are we getting? Growing penetration on both brands. Atkins is we identified our positioning shift, which happened around the time we went public, was a move from focusing on what we called low-carb program dieters to, and at the time when we did the study, we thought there were somewhere around 8 million of those. We had done a nice job in the previous eight years targeting those and having successful growth. The research that we did said there were about 33 million more low-carb consumers, lifestyle consumers who had kind of weight management as one of their consumer benefits. It's not about weight loss, it's about living with my weight every day and how do I keep that under control. We've been targeting that consumer. It led to a shift in consumer communication around fast weight loss, lose 12 pounds in eight weeks. Pre and post pictures of people that are celebrities pre and post to Rob Lowe, skinny dudes, never had to lose weight because he knows how to eat, and he lives a Atkins lifestyle. We've been going after that consumer target. I haven't seen a study in the last year, but last time we looked at it, those self-directed low carbers were the source of growth, not a surprise. In the case of Quest, we're gathering our database on Quest from a consumer standpoint. Here's what I do know. The single biggest contributor to Quest's household penetration growth has been the growth of chips. The other forms have been more stable from a household penetration standpoint, but we brought in a significant number of new buyers on chips, and they were incremental to the brand. Which leads you to a series of marketing questions like, do they buy bars? How do we get them to buy more of those products? I've already asked all those questions, and the marketing team is working on those things. The other thing I want to know about Quest that we're still trying to learn is when I bring them in, do they stay? How much do they buy? How long do they stay, right? Some of the things that are fundamental to effective marketing. What's their lifetime value? We're in the middle of that work, and as soon as I know more, I'll share it with you all. That's helpful. You anticipated my next questions there, so I'll leave those for a future call. One other follow-up on that. As you extend the brands with other product forms to serve additional occasions, and I'm particularly thinking about Quest, which as you mentioned earlier, is about active nutrition, active lifestyles, fit individuals, and you're moving the brand from kind of a bar orientation into more indulgent occasions with frosted cookies this year, for instance. Do you worry that you maybe lose a part of that core active fit positioning? I might not have thought you about that the right way, that it's just open-ended, and you don't risk losing that or turning off that kind of core consumer that has brought you to where you are with it? Thanks. Yeah. Great question. It was core to the change in strategy and communication. If the campaign that was being run prior to the one that just went on air was around the snacks that you crave with the macros that you love. Right? No compromise. I can get a snack, those things that I would see on a Super Bowl table for a snack table. Those are the things I really crave, and I want to have those every day, but I don't want bad macros, right? I don't want them to be high in carbs and sugar and low in protein, right? That was the positioning before around cravability of snack. The positioning now, which is an evolution of where we were, is around athlete-worthy nutrition, even though you don't need to be an athlete. It's around fueling people's desire for whatever they're trying to achieve. It's to some degree about self-actualization without compromise. Great-tasting products that fuel my desire to achieve what I want to achieve. We moved away from cravability. Now the products themselves, there's elements of this that are highly indulgent, like you mentioned, our iced cookies. Frankly, it's still around Regardless of the snack form, it is completely about athlete-worthy nutrition, even though you don't need an athlete. We were very choiceful in the campaign. We picked aspiring professional athletes. We picked two, an NFL rookie and a WNBA rookie, because they're still on a quest to be successful in their professional careers, and our target audience finds them very aspirational. We picked two people kind of who changed their career midstream. A former professional football player who became a firefighter, a former office person who became a yoga instructor, right? Again, it's about fueling their aspirations and their quest in life. We think the positioning addresses that question, that exact question that you asked. Very helpful. Thanks so much. Okay. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Eric Larson with Seaport Research Partners. Please proceed with your questions. Thank you, everybody, and I'll extend my congratulations as well. I guess my question is probably more for Todd here, but I'm just trying to get a little bit clearer cadence on how your gross profit margins are going to work. You price in June, you announce in June, and you price September 12th. Q1's going to get all but maybe a few days of your pricing. Is what's holding up the margins is you're still seeing in the first half favorable channel and customer and product mix? In that you might be taking a more conservative stance on a comparison basis in the second half, so should we be conservative on our gross margins in 2H? Yeah. For the first quarter, as we said in our remarks, Q1, actually, gross margins should be relatively flat. We still have some coverage at very attractive prices through Q1. Despite what you correctly said, we're not going to see much of a pricing benefit in the quarter. We still had some very favorable coverage, and we do have the channel and product mix that you mentioned, which will allow us to, we believe, to keep gross margins relatively flat in Q1. That coverage largely goes away as we enter Q2. We do have coverage throughout the first half of the year, but once we get into Q2 and beyond, the pricing is not as attractive as we've had in the second half of this year and this first quarter. Margins will start to contract as we get into Q2 and beyond. You can expect gross margins to be relatively stable in the first quarter. Okay, thanks. Next question is for Joe. Joe, I think you've covered a whole bunch of these points already, but when you look back at your sort of initial guidance on Quest, I think you said, "Well, we're going to go at Quest quite slowly because we don't want to screw it up." I think that was your comment. You've precisely done that. As you look at Quest now, obviously household penetration is a big positive. Are you more optimistic on Quest today? Just kind of give us our thoughts because the growth there has been phenomenal. I guess the question is, how sustainable is that growth? I'm just curious on your perception of Quest now post-acquisition. Yeah, we had high aspirations and a strong belief in the brand. The performance of the brand has exceeded both of those. The business is performing singularly outstanding, and it's been kind of the recent innovation that has been a key driver of the brand. The R&D pipeline that we acquired with the brand has, for the most part, outperformed our expectations. Very high on chips, strong performance on cookies, strong performance on its entry into confections. RTDs, kind of a push, right? The other forms performed really, really well. We believed that there was opportunity to continue to sharpen the positioning of the brand because if you just talk qualitatively to people in focus groups who have purchased the brand, they really don't know, for the most part, what the brand stands for. Core user that bought the protein bar probably saw it in the gym or bought it online, but was part of that little ecosystem. That core user knows the brand, understands it, knows its history, believes in it. A lot of the recent growth in consumers, less clear about what the brand stood for. Our opportunity on the brand, and I think we're just in the early stages of that, is, you said it, we don't want to screw it up, so we were slow about the positioning of the brand. We feel like we've got a strategy, we've got communication execution that will grow brand awareness and create a positioning in people's mind around the brand that will enable it to continue to grow beyond just the product innovation. Okay. Just a quick follow-up on that. Obviously, part of your household penetration is potentially increased distribution, but you haven't mentioned distribution specifically. What might be the opportunities in that for Quest? Well, certainly on Quest it has been, because we grew distribution on chips. Chips outperformed all year as we grew distribution on it, and it grew household penetration. In the case of Quest, I can directly tie filling white space with a snack item that significantly grew household penetration. I think in that case, white space was really important to the brand. The only reason we tend to be conservative about talking forward on distribution is I've been in businesses where you build distribution and your velocity per item falls, and it's less incremental than you think. We just like to see it in the marketplace performing before we talk about its incremental value, either from a volume standpoint or a penetration standpoint. I like our pipeline. Our pipeline, I believe, will be incremental to our core consumption. Innovating beyond bars and shakes, I think will be a key strategy to our business going forward. We just like to wait and see how it performs before we talk to you about how we feel about it. I expect with our pipeline, we'll have nice growth in the breadth and the depth of penetration in the marketplace on both of our brands. We'll see how they perform from an incrementality standpoint and ability to drive new buyers to our brand. Our track record's pretty good on both of those, I might add, but let's wait and see how they perform. Okay. Thank you for your comments, Joe. You're welcome. Thank you. Our last question of the day comes from Kaumil Gajrawala of Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your questions. Hi. Thanks everybody for, I guess, squeezing me in and, I'll reiterate what everybody else has said about well done on those pricing maneuvers. I think you guys are more the exception than the rule. If I may ask you, a little more detail on the mix effect on margins and maybe the mix effect that you expect on margins, given there's an increase in mobility. There's mix effect as it relates to product mixes. Is there maybe a general idea you could give us on what the impact of mix will have on your margins? Yeah. There's really two big drivers. As we've left COVID, bars got hit very hard last year during the initial year of COVID. As that has come back, bars on both brands, it's the highest margin products we have. That's a huge plus. The second piece I would say is from a channel mix perspective. Brick and mortar obviously got impacted greatly during COVID, particularly on our business and the e-com world went crazy. E-com margins we have are very good, but they are a little bit below our brick and mortars. As brick and mortar and e-com now have got more in balance from a growth perspective, that has helped as well. I can't give you an exact number, but it's been positive. We're not talking a huge amount of delta here because our margins by customer and by form are not dramatically different. It's been a positive benefit, and I think we'll continue to see that in Q1 and Q2, and that will help us mitigate some of the inflation impact. Okay, great. If I can ask maybe about e-commerce and if the trends are any different in what you're seeing, maybe in your SPINS data or whatever it is from a market share perspective in your channels outside of the tracked channels. Yeah. We've done really well in e-com. We have gained share. Obviously, with the major e-com player out there, we feel great about our business there, particularly on the Quest side. The growth just continues to be incredible. Market share has been very positive for us for the last couple of years. Okay, great. Thank you. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to Joe Scalzo for any closing comments. Thanks for your participation on today's call. We hope you continue to remain safe, and we look forward to updating you on our first quarter results in January. Have a good day.