Ladies and gentlemen, good morning, and welcome to SuperCom's first quarter 2024 financial results and corporate update conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Participants of this call are advised that the audio of this conference call is being broadcast live over the Internet and is also being recorded for playback purposes. Joining me from SuperCom's leadership team is Ordan Trabelsi, SuperCom's President and Chief Executive Officer. I'd like to remind you that during this call, SuperCom management may be making forward-looking statements, including statements that address SuperCom's expectations for future performance or operational results. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause SuperCom's actual results to differ materially from those statements. For more information about these risks, uncertainties, and factors, please refer to the risk factors described in SuperCom's most recently filed periodic reports on Form 20-F and Form 6-K, and SuperCom's press release that accompanies this call, particularly the cautionary statements in it. Today's conference call includes EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure that SuperCom believes can be useful in evaluating its performance. You should not consider this additional information in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net loss, a comparable GAAP financial measure, please see the reconciliation table located in SuperCom's earnings press release that accompanies this call. Reconciliations for other non-GAAP financial measures and comparable GAAP financial measures are available there as well. The content of this call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of today, May 15th, 2024. Except as required by law, SuperCom disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any information to reflect events or circumstances that occur after this call. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to SuperCom's President and CEO, Ordan Trabelsi. Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release with our financial results for the first quarter of 2024. You can find a copy of it in the investor relations section on our website at supercom.com. Today, I'll start my comments with a brief update on our recent business highlights, strategy, and Q1 results, followed by a Q&A session. SuperCom had a great start to the year with a strong first quarter. We achieved an 8-year record quarterly net income of $800,000, representing $2.3 million improvement year-over-year. We're thrilled with this outstanding performance and look forward to maintaining this momentum in the coming quarters. During the quarter, we executed an advance on various projects in our portfolio, such as a $33 million national EM project in Romania. We utilized operating leverage and prior investments in our proprietary technology to achieve a significant EBITDA increase of 400% year-over-year to a level of $2 million EBITDA this quarter. For those new to SuperCom, our mission is to revolutionize the public safety sector worldwide with our proprietary electronic monitoring technology, data intelligence, and suite of complementary services. With over 35 years of experience since our founding in 1988, we've been a trusted partner to dozens of national governments worldwide, providing cutting-edge electronic and digital security solutions. Our strategic blueprint is straightforward, yet powerful. Lead with innovative technology, develop superior solutions, expand our global presence, and deliver outstanding service. This strategy is backed by the following: Our proprietary electronic monitoring technology, which scores highly in competitive government tenders and supports various programs such as house arrest, GPS monitoring, rehabilitation services, domestic violence prevention, and more. Since 2018, SuperCom has secured over 50 new multiyear government projects. Our strong, growing reputation as a proven provider of electronic monitoring solutions and services enhances our market position with each new customer win. Our strategic focus on the IoT tracking business in developed markets, where the opportunity is greatest. With the electronic monitoring market projected to reach $2.3 billion by 2028, the U.S. and Europe constitute about 95% of these markets. Altogether, these successes and opportunities have resulted in a growing project pipeline and substantial recurring revenue. Last year, we continued to amplify our technological leadership, which is significant R&D investments, leading to the launch of advanced solutions like PureProtect and PureOne. These offerings are already making headway in various markets, including the U.S., and are pivotal in SuperCom's expansion. PureProtect is a life-saving domestic violence monitoring solution. This solution provides improved protection to families suffering from domestic violence. This innovative solution addresses domestic violence issues and further enhances the company's portfolio of products and services. PureOne is an all-in-one GPS tracking ankle bracelet monitoring solution that integrates comprehensive monitoring capabilities into a single device. Like many of our products, it offers top-notch features, placing it above competition in most metrics, such as battery life, weight, comfort, and more. So these two products, PureProtect and PureOne, have been significant innovations which have helped us redefine and upheaval competitors and segments in the industry. Our cloud-based software-enabled PureSecurity product line has been particularly effective monitoring domestic violence offenders and managing real-time information as well. The real-time advantage is a game changer to the industry because it empowers authorities with actionable insights and timely intervention to mitigate potential risks and enhance public safety. These products have also been well received and have significantly expanded the company's addressable market. We've been very pleased with the reception and traction of our newest solutions and expect them to help facilitate the accelerated expansion of SuperCom into the U.S. market and further European countries. We've fortified our operational infrastructure to support our growth and have revamped our sales strategy with a proactive outreach approach. Our sales team, with deep industry expertise, has been instrumental in achieving new wins and driving growth. Over the past months, we announced many new project wins in the U.S. and Europe. SuperCom has continued displacing incumbent vendors and achieved an over 65% win rate in Europe in competitive tenders over the recent years. Despite macroeconomic uncertainties and the ongoing Israel-Gaza war, SuperCom solutions are being increasingly relevant. Factors like high recidivism rates and the escalating cost of incarceration make our solutions not only cost-effective, but also essential for governments looking to enhance public safety and reduce costs. The company's PureSecurity technology solutions have been designed to address this trend, offering an effective way for institutions to enforce home confinement, ease prison overcrowding, and lower costs significantly. For example, the total daily cost for monitoring an offender on home confinement or GPS monitoring is approximately $10-$35, compared to the much higher cost of $100-$140 at a correctional facility. Most importantly, home confinement has been shown to reduce recidivism, highlighting its effectiveness in helping offenders improve their lives and communities. On top of these growth drivers, we have witnessed a surge in the adoption of victim protection solutions worldwide, which aligns perfectly with our strategic plan and the launch of our new product, PureProtect. In the European market, SuperCom expanded its business in over 10 countries and secured significant new contracts, which are typically awarded through a competitive tender process. Besides winning new projects, we continue to execute and receive ongoing orders from our partners. Just about three weeks ago, we announced receipt of new orders valued at over $5 million from European governments. Thanks to our optimized and efficient production processes, over 50% of these orders have already been delivered. Last year, we secured a new national program with the Finnish government to deploy our domestic violence monitoring solution. The deployment of our PureSecurity suite, consisting of PureProtect, PureTrack, PureTag, and PureMonitor, demonstrates the versatility and effectiveness of our solutions and underscores our leadership in the electronic monitoring space. Our collaboration with Finland is a prime example of the confidence that clients have in SuperCom, as those who experience our services often choose to broaden their engagement with our diverse array of solutions. Notably, at the end of 2022, the company won the largest industry award of the year for national electronic monitoring project in Romania, valued at $33 million, including up to 15,000 monitored offenders per month for up to six years. During 2023, we announced orders valued at over $10 million from Romania's Ministry of Interior, further expanding our engagement in the country's national EM project. This large-scale project reinforces the strength of our PureSecurity suite and cements our position as a trusted partner for governments worldwide. We also launched our domestic violence solutions in other European regions and recently launched them in the U.S. Although SuperCom already does business in multiple U.S. states, we are actively focused on further expanding our presence in the U.S. Our wholly owned subsidiary, LCA, located in California, is actively expanding the size and scope of existing programs, winning rebids with existing customers and winning new programs with new customers. The company strategically prioritizes PureOne's expansion into new markets and geographies. It has received high praise during its introduction into various regions of the U.S., where PureOne has been successfully deployed and is actively utilized to monitor live offenders. Moreover, sales activities for PureOne have commenced in promising new markets outside Europe and North America. Our new strategic sales team and new wins have been the first step in executing the company's U.S. market expansion strategy and have already driven increased activity within existing customers and multiple new demos, resulting in a significant increase in the company's pipeline. Launching our PureOne solution in late 2023 was a significant milestone in our U.S. expansion strategy. In 2024, we've already announced three new project wins in North America to provide the solution. The first, through LCA, we won a new project in California valued up to $2 million to provide comprehensive program focused on re-entry services for all adult inmates. The award was a result of winning a formal competitive bid process. Moreover, LCA secured a new electronic monitoring contract in California with an established California services provider in the judicial sector. This contract is particularly notable for SuperCom's successful displacement of a long-term incumbent vendor. Finally, SuperCom won a new project in Canada with a renowned Canadian industry partner in the tracking solution sector. This project expands the existing collaboration with this long-standing partner, transitioning from providing RF-based tracking technology to embracing new GPS technologies. As I mentioned earlier, introducing our PureOne solution was a game changer in securing these contracts. It underscores our competitive edge and commitment to delivering innovative and superior technology solutions. By securing these contracts, we further reinforce our position as a market leader. We view our recent wins as indicators of our growing influence and expansion potential in North America and worldwide. As we mentioned in previous calls, we believe there's also an opportunity to enhance our U.S. growth through strategic acquisitions of local electronic monitoring service providers with a strong reputation and customer base in their local markets. We constantly monitor the market for potential acquisitions that could generate significant value by immediately expanding market presence and providing vertical integration synergies. Our acquisition of LCA in 2016 for $3 million is a great example. The successful acquisition has provided us a great strategic value to the company, through which we won over $35 million in new project wins and is generated in California alone. I'll now turn to the financials. During our previous conference call, I mentioned that we anticipated contributing to our financial results in the subsequent quarters as our ongoing projects matured. I'm delighted to share we've substantially improved our financial and operating results. We've seen a gross profit margin increase by 123% to 55% from 25%. Moreover, we've sustained positive EBITDA in each of the last four years, 2020 to 2023, and seen remarkable operating improvements, as evidenced by a record net income of $800,000 this quarter, along with $400,000 EBITDA growth year- over- year to $2 million. This is driven by the significant growth in our company's revenue in the past few years, targeted spending and operating leverage. This quarter's profitability metrics demonstrate how we can seize the high margin potential of our project portfolio through successful execution and progression in different stages of these projects. The following is a comparison between the financial results of first quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2023. Gross profit increased by 139% to $3.8 million compared to $1.6 million. Was a direct outcome of the progress we've made across our projects, where margins typically enhance as projects mature. Typically, the initial project stages incur high expenses, while advanced stages yield higher gross margins, causing fluctuations in our gross profit depending on project composition and deployment stages. As the project pipeline matures, we expect an upward trend in gross margins based on the evolving project portfolio. As we deploy additional bracelets in regions where we run existing projects on our infrastructure, the contribution margins for each additional bracelet can be high, even as high as 70% or more. We decreased our R&D expenses by $90,000, while we continued to develop and launch new features and improve existing products, keeping us at the edge of innovation and technology leadership in our space. In addition, our sales and marketing expenses decreased by $50,000, while we increased our revenues year-over-year. Moreover, our general administrative expenses increased by $300,000 to accommodate our management team expansion, also in the U.S., which has already yielded results, such as evidence of three new contracts we have won in the past months. The company's operating income improved by $1.8 million, from $700,000 compared to an operating loss of $1.8 million before. So we improved by 1.8% to $700,000, compared to an operating loss of $1.1 million in the prior year, resulting from a significant increase in our gross profit. EPS improved to +$0.04, compared to negative EPS of $0.32 in the prior year period. The company's EBITDA improved by 400% to $2 million, compared to $400,000, reflecting benefits to operating leverage associated with higher revenues, deployed new IoT projects, and continued progress on the phases in our ongoing projects. This achievement underscores our focus on on sustained growth and profitability. Our net income improved by $2.3 million from a net loss of $1.5 million last quarter to net profit of $800,000 this quarter. Our non-GAAP net profit improved by $1.6 million to $1.35 million profit, compared to the $250,000 loss in the former year period. Positive non-GAAP EPS improved to positive $0.07, compared to negative non-GAAP EPS of $0.05. Our cash position is stable. We have a credit facility in place, and we focus on reducing our need for external cash as we continue to win and execute more new projects. Also, last month, we completed a successful close of $2.9 million public offering to support the company's continued innovation and growth initiatives, a testament to the investment community's trust in our vision and strategic trajectory. In addition, the company had one-time expense of $280,000, mainly pertaining to the legacy business and allowance of doubtful debt. We continue to invest in our sales and marketing, as well as R&D, to drive revenue growth and expand our global footprint and execute our business plan. In closing, I'd like to thank our global team for the hard, tireless work to achieve our company's record-setting performance this quarter. We have developed the right technology and products to help criminal justice systems, clients overcome challenges and make better use of the over $80 billion spent annually in the U.S. on operating rehabilitation centers and prisons. With research showing an approximate 75% recidivism rate in the U.S., there's significant room for improvement when effective programs and technology are deployed. We're excited about the growth we are experiencing and about the growing demand for our products. After several years through which we transitioned from our legacy business to the IoT tracking offender business, we're happy to show the shift to nice growth in revenue and profit. We believe that we're well positioned to continued growth and continued expansion by capitalizing on the many new opportunities before us. These are being driven by multiple factors, including our strong presence and reputation in the U.S. and European markets, the countercyclical nature of the electronic monitoring in this industry, the growing public policy shift to monitoring instead of incarceration, and the growing adoption of domestic violence prevention solutions. We anticipate sustained growth by further expanding our market share in the U.S. and Europe, are committed to preserving our technological advancement as a robust growth foundation remains steadfast, and we continue to invest in this area. With that, I'll turn the call over to operator for questions. Operator? Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you wish to ask a question on today's call, you will need to press star, then the number one on your telephone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before entering your request and speaking on the call. If your question has been answered and you wish to withdraw your question, you may do so by pressing star two. One moment, please, for the first question. Your first question for today is from Matthew Galinko with Maxim Group. Can you maybe start, I know you touched on it in the prepared remarks, but your gross margin was, you know, I think one of the stronger quarters in recent history. So can you touch a little bit more on why this quarter in particular was able to, you know, get to that mid-50% range, if my math is correct, and, you know, how sustainable is that, given where you are in your current, you know, I guess, growth cycle? Thanks. Great question. As you can see, there's a general trend of increasing our gross margins as we're reaching later stages in our current projects. There are some fluctuations because some of our projects, like the Romanian project, consists of a big part of our revenues, and you know, as the mix changes between the quarters of the various parts of the project, they drive within the gross margin, which is affiliated with it. Generally speaking, at the initial stages of a project, you have a lot of hardware installations and training, a lot of hours from our teams and hardware purchases, which are lower margin in nature. And later stages of the projects are just kind of manufacturing more bracelets and providing maintenance and support for our software. So the more we can be in the later stages of the project, the higher our margins will be. So as the new projects come upon, smaller projects won't make as much of an impact, but the larger ones will, and they will also drive margins through these later stages, where initially they're a little lower and later they're higher. Got it. Thank you. And it sounds like your focus is on the North American market today, maybe because you have those products now available. But can you talk a little bit about, you know, kind of North America versus Europe for, you know, 2024, I guess? Is there just more to be had in the U.S. market today? The U.S. market's roughly 3x-4x, based on market research, 3x-4x the size of the European market. We've been doing very well in Europe. We had over 65% win rate over recent years, and it's national projects, so we have to bid on one by one, and even without a large sales team, we're able to win consistently because of our high scoring technology. The U.S. market is a little more fragmented, requires a little more boots on the ground, and we're actually scaling up and growing our team accordingly to address that. We developed the Pure, the PureOne product, which is a one-piece solution, which meets, you know, a lot of the requirements and, you know, behaviors that are more accustomed to the U.S. market. But we developed in a way that has the most, let's say, optimized features in terms of battery life and lightweight and remote charging and others. That helps us, you know, come in with a splash when we compete against incumbent vendors. But the U.S. market, we think, for us, is a nice and interesting opportunity because we haven't taken advantage of it yet, and all the potential there. We're just in early stages. Our pipeline is growing. We're in the middle of active live demos right now, and we hope to continue growing that more and more. And at some point, that could be the size of Europe and even larger. Thanks. And one last question for me before I jump back in the queue. You seem to have, you know, I think you mentioned a greater than 65% win rate in Europe, and, you know, you're starting to gain some traction in the U.S., North America, with the new products. What is the competitive response to, you know, to your, your successes to date with this strategy? Is there, a re there any companies that are, you know, seeing an impetus to, to try to catch you on the product side? Or do you think that, you know, you're still kind of a uniquely focused, player in the market that you could stay and continue to have an edge? You say response on the product side. So a lot of the, a lot of our competitors, the market is roughly 10 international players, and it's a very highly barriered market, so Google or Apple are not going to be coming in any day, without an acquisition. You have to show that you've been doing this for five, 10 years to even compete. So we know the players. A lot of them haven't updated their technology so much over the last recent years. They use their relationships to try to hold on existing contracts. The market average growth rate is anywhere between, let's say, 7%-13%, every year, and we've been growing at, I think, a CAGR of 70%. So we're growing significantly faster than the average market and the average companies on the market. Some of them try to respond to improving technology, but we haven't seen any threats there with anyone that's competing with the level of progress and advancement that we're showing. We're not just showing technology which is more advanced and has more features, we're also expanding our technological capabilities and adding new features at a very high rate. So we continue to every project we do, and we're doing a whole lot of projects, we add more features and more capabilities that we develop for X customer. We bring it to customer Y, we bring it to customer Z. And then you saw, like in Finland, for example, we started with one type of program, then we added domestic violence, and we saw the same thing in Sweden. We started with one, and then we added other programs. We expect to do the same. What's great about this technology that a lot of it is software on the cloud, and you can apply it to the new bracelets we have as well, because these bracelets are leased, is that once we have a new capability, we can share it to customers existing and new alike. Got it. That makes sense. Thanks. I'll jump back in the queue. Thank you. Once again, if there are any questions, please press star one. Your next question for today is from Dan Schatz, a private investor. Hi, everyone. First of all, it was great to see a positive net income and the gross margin expansion was fantastic. My question really is concerning the repeated capital raises over the last couple of years that have diluted existing shareholders. I'm a longtime shareholder, been a big fan of the company, but I'm hopeful that we've turned the corner now with some net profitability. And I know we recently raised some money at a price that was higher than the stock was trading at. But I guess my question is, are you planning on any additional capital raises? And I'm hoping that we can leave that to a minimum if you are. Thank you for your continued support in SuperCom and great questions. We so I I've been, I was a CEO, and if you remember, I was a CEO in the U.S. for the years before, and in 2021, I moved to Israel for the global CEO role, and we changed some of our strategy, and a lot of that was focused on growth because we had declines in revenues for five years or so, and we shifted to growth. So from 2021, revenues went from $11.7 million to $12.5 million to $17+ million, and now last year we closed over $25 million. In order to achieve that growth, in a short period of time, we had to also expand our focus on growth, and that, that cost money and it brought us into, you know, needs of cash. But what's nice to see is, while we focused on growth and we did have needs cash, our cash usually had declined over the years. So from three years ago, it was roughly $9 million in operating cash, and then $4.5 million, and last year was just somewhere in the mid two, between $2 million and $3 million. As projects reach later stages, like the Romania project, then they become more cash flow positive, and then we could use that to stabilize our cash needs. And we did this capital raise just now to give us more support and to have a cushion for fluctuation. But currently, we're actually doing pretty good from an operating cash perspective. Sometimes we're even breakeven or cash flow positive, and sometimes we're a little bit cash flow negative when we need to manufacture things ahead of time. Like for some projects that are leased, we need to manufacture a lot of bracelets ahead of time, and you know that brings us into temporary cash flow negativity on that project and then afterwards. But these things balance out, and with the large amount of projects that we're doing, they start to kind of stabilize one another. And we hope that over the years, our cash needs will decline. That being said, when there are big projects out there that require, you know, massive expansion and units, we think it's okay to take on those projects because they grow the company significantly. Those will require some cash upfront sometimes. Then we would accordingly look for capital raises. We try to keep it to a minimum, and as you can see, our uses have been decreasing over time. Now the state we're at, after these three years of growth, we're happy to see that our cash use for operations have declined, and we're able to depend more on our operating cash production rather than external cash. So we're cognizant of that. We're trying to reduce the capital raises to a minimum, but also are aware that there's many opportunities out there, and if there's opportunities that could provide a great return to our investors, we will try to capitalize on them. Thank you. Appreciate that, that commentary and the feedback. I just caution you to keep in mind the existing shareholders when that capital raise happens, because we've suffered a significant amount of dilution over the last couple of years. Yeah. Thank you. Okay, good. Yeah, we're very aware, and hopefully over time, the valuation will justify all the activities that we've been doing to grow the company over the years. Yeah. Your next question for today is from Mike Walters, a private investor. Good morning, Mr. Trabelsi. Thanks for taking your time- Good morning. Good morning. Great quarterly. Thank you for taking your time to provide us with another one. I appreciate, always appreciate your quarterly earnings and conference calls. Congratulations to you guys on another quarter of growth, record growth. As a long-term investor, four years now, I've been pleased by your methodical progress over time. It's been, I appreciate the questions also that were also asked. It's been up and down, you know, with the growth thing, and I appreciate your answer. You also answered one of my questions, was that, whenever you have to dip into the capital, you're using it on possibly projects that could be positive to us as shareholders in the future, correct? Did you say? Can you repeat the last, the last sentence? You broke up for a second. Whenever your use of capital is directed towards possible shareholder value growing in the future. Yes, of course. And we're also- Yes. Me, myself, and other management, we also own shares, and we're very inclined and interested in to increase the value of the shares. Also, our main focus is just that sometimes short term, we need to raise capital to manifest our long-term goals. Our current stock price, we believe, does not represent the intrinsic value of the company at all. We're trading, you know, at fractions of multiples that we're seeing in the industry, and we're growing at 10x faster than the average industry, as I said earlier. So we think over time, the market value will align with intrinsic value, and then investors will be able to appreciate the valuations for the company. I appreciate that answer. It seems to me that you guys have a good and growing pulse on your fundamentals. Would you say, fundamentally speaking, that's probably correct? We have a growing pulse? Sorry. Pulse. Yeah, yeah, a good, a great pulse on your fundamentals, and that they are growing in the right direction. Yes. So we're, as you can see from some of the improvements in profitability, we try to focus on fundamentals and also the underlying technology and the health of our projects. We're able to rebid these projects, to win the rebids, as we said, because we have a great relationship with our customers and maintaining a great reputation that helps us to win more projects in other places around the world. That kind of leads into my next question, on June 29th of last year, you guys issued a press release that you incorporated advanced AI capabilities to enhance your monitoring solutions. Yes. Yes. And, integrated cutting-edge AI models to empower your EM offerings by unlocking new real-time data insights and enhanced decision-making processes. So I was wondering about that, because you guys are obviously bidding on, or you are, announcing contracts over the course of, last couple of years pretty frequently. So my question is, does the AI, does the advancement in your AI capabilities, get stronger every, every contract? Like, is it, does it make it more efficient, your next onboarding? Because I like. I noticed that you guys, like, part of your business model, is to onboard your customers, which I like. I like that a lot, that you onboard your customers before actually coming to terms on the contracts. I was wondering if the AI, the advance, the investment into the AI is paying off, possibly by maybe making each onboarding more efficient than the last. Yeah, so as you might be familiar with AI in general, the more data you have, the more helpful it is. For us, it's still we started designing the implementation for a lot of these constructs and modules, and we have a lot of data, not just new, but over the years, with onboarding of, you know, tens of thousands of customers, different regions around the world. That could be used to help the, at first, the officer, when they're tracking all these offenders, because one officer could be tracking 50-100 offenders at the same time. It's hard for them to keep track of everything. And when there's behaviors that create trends, it's easy for us to know that something's gonna happen before the officer even sees it. Those are the kind of, it's an example of a kind of AI insight- Oh. That we use the learning to improve. But these are still, these are still- Okay. Yeah, a lot of them are still in various design and implementation stages, and we think that there's a big opportunity there for more value creation for our customers as these start to roll out in a more efficient and, you know, comprehensive fashion. Also, a lot of the labor-intensive tasks of monitoring, you have to do a lot of clicks, a lot of shifts from one to one will help with that, and that will make the efficiency for the programs, which will save effectively more costs and also save more officer time. That's what I was thinking. Okay. That's about what I was thinking. Your employees, you guys employ over 100 people, and you said that, in the one answer, you said that you implemented a new, another, or an addition to a new sales team? What did you say about the employees? Sorry. Employees, I think you're over 100. Is that- Yeah. True? Yeah, we're over. Um- Globally, we're over 100, yes, 120. You're probably pretty proud of 120. Awesome. You're probably pretty proud of them, and the progress. Yeah, I'm mostly proud. We've had a great run in the last quarters. We're doing very well with the growth and profitability and winning new projects, and there's a lot of work for we're a relatively small team, a lot of work, and we're doing a lot of these things at the same time. So, yes, we're very happy with our teams. I'm happy with your progress as well. Yeah, I was a little bit surprised by the $5.7 million. I actually thought that that was, that might have been a challenge a little bit, as an estimate, because I know in the past, the estimates haven't, I felt like, reflected your actual progress, but this one I felt like challenged you a little bit with the $5.7 million revenue, and I was happy to see that it was $6.9 million. So I'm really proud of you guys' continued growth, and I look forward to continuing to invest with you guys long term. Good. Thank you for your support and for your questions. Yeah. With that, I'll let you go. Thanks. Thanks, we're done. Thank you. Your next question is a follow-up question from Matthew Galinko. Hey, hello again. Two quick follow-ups for you. First, kind of a balance sheet question. I noticed your receivables were up in the first quarter, you know, compared to the end of 2023. Just wanted to see, you know, guess, is there a meaningful difference in payment terms between U.S. and European EM clients? And, I guess, what moves the payment terms around? Just sometimes it's just how it falls at the end of the quarter, because you can receive an order, just like we receive $5 million orders. You can receive orders and you start to manufacture them and deliver them. You recognize revenues, but you haven't received the cash yet. On the other hand, you can receive the cash right before the end of the quarter, and then it brings down the AR nicely for the report, so to speak. But we're not, you know, some of these are paid by delivery, and some of these are consistently monthly payments based on lease. So we have a whole mix of projects. The more lease-like project, which is more what's happening in the U.S., it's more of a monthly basis, which is a little bit more consistent than the delivery, which is sometimes the national projects in Europe, which are more, you know, they buy the units and they manufacture them. Got it. Thanks. And then just given how strong Romania has been for you over the last few quarters, I guess I'm curious how you look at the kind of business excluding Romania. Obviously, you have a lot of, lot of wins, but, you know, how do you, how do you balance the, the risk a little bit? Or, like, how do you kind of fill in that, that, that bucket when, y ou know, if Romania slows down, you know, can you kind of fill in the gap with the rest of your pipeline? Is the question. So first of all, Romania is still running well, and they're ordering more and more, and we'll see if the customer continues to maintain its positivity and its satisfaction. As you've seen with other customers in the world, there's always opportunities for growth programs and additional programs. Meanwhile, we're not just relying on Romania, of course. We're bidding on other projects and in Europe and in the U.S., we have active demos, and a lot of those will come to add on to Romania and also add on to the base of other projects that we have there. Romania is certainly a nice win, and rather than just being a nice win, which gives us nice revenues and profitability, it's also a good reference. Because as you may remember in the past, that there's some projects we couldn't bid on because we didn't have references of a certain size. Here, you're looking at a 15,000 units, simultaneous, 15,000 simultaneous units product project with domestic violence. There aren't many of these in the world, and we have, and we've been implementing it successfully. And when there, when other projects of large size come out, we could bid and show that we've been doing this, very nicely, and so that puts us in a, in a, in a new area where we weren't, if you look three or four years ago. I guess as a follow-up to that, does your success in Romania scale in Europe help as a reference for, you know, doing state-level projects in the U.S. or North America? Yeah. Of course, you know, the closer you are, it's easier to, you know, to win Texas after you've done California. The closer you are, since this is in the same country, then there is more similarity there. But a $33 million project of 50,000 units is, you know, it's substantial anywhere in the world. And it's our biggest one, and we grew up a ladder. We started with projects in Lithuania of 100,000, 200,000, Lithuania, Latvia. We went off to Canada, $1.8 million, and we had Finland and Denmark, and some of these are $3 million-$4 million, and Sweden was $7 million, that was $33 million. So this certainly does help us. In the U.S., the more we win, we're still doing counties in the U.S., we're also looking at states, and we also considered maybe going federal level in the U.S. as well. It's all a matter of where do we have the highest return on investment on our dollar spent. So some of these projects could have a very nice return, but the expected return is low because we don't know the probabilities there, because these are large projects that we haven't yet worked on as much. Whereas in Europe, we can bid on with more confidence, as we know, we know pretty, pretty much how things are going to fall out and how the competitors align and score in these projects. We've done many of them. In the U.S., we're trying to develop that same capability and the same knowledge, and we're going to able to use that more effectively. So we're still in the early stages in the U.S., and that's what's exciting about this. There's a big opportunity there, and we're very well positioned for it. Great. I appreciate the call. As a reminder, if there are any questions, please press star one. Once again, if there are any questions or comments, please press star one on your phone at this time. Your next question is from Eric Hamilton, a private investor. I know you're concentrating on the prison market, but what about the migrant market? Is there any opportunities for you to solicit your products to countries that have migration problems? Can you repeat that? Migration problems with, over the borders? Yes. Yes. In the U.S., there's, s orry, go ahead. Are the countries that have these issues interested in getting the bracelets or monitors from you to monitor the migrants coming into their countries? Good question. It's something that we're looking into and considering further. We know that in the U.S., there's the ICE program, and they use similar technology to track people coming over the border. They call them detainees. They come over the border from Mexico, and they're being tracked for a period of time until they decide the status and if they're approved to enter fully. They have big programs with, I think, over 100,000 units. Other countries are considering and have considered, not just now, but also over the recent years, various programs like that, and we've been looking into it, but we have not yet made that our biggest focus. Our biggest focus has been on the programs in the country for the offender monitoring. That's where the complexity is the greatest. Since we have technological prowess and we're able to score higher, we can go straight to the, you know, to the largest projects with the, with the highest complexities. But these are other ones that are complementary and that could be added, and it's something that over time, we'll probably look into further, even though we've already started looking. Well, the technology you have that you've done for the prison systems, would the same technology be used for a migrant monitoring system? The technology, I mean, the government would use the technology in whichever way they would like, but the technology is the same. It's different policies. You have different rules and different procedures, but the technological capabilities are the same. You have a bracelet, you monitor someone's location. There's anti-tampering, and they can't take it off, they can't remove it. There's all these processes on the back end, the data intelligence aspect of what people are doing and how they're doing. And you know, we provide so much flexibility and so much customization to our customers. We have so many customers that they each want something a little bit different. This is, it's called a simple adjustment if someone were to change from this to that. The technology's there. Well, I know you have a limited staff and workforce, but I have to think that this is an area that you should be investing in and trying to get some of these substantial contracts if the technology is the same for a migrant as it would be for an inmate. It just makes sense that you would be taking some personnel and trying to get yourself involved in this migrant problem, because it's huge, and I think it would be a good way of the governments monitoring these people that come into the countries. So first of all, you're right. Certainly it's a good idea to look at complementary markets with similar technology, and that's what we've been doing consistently. That's how we entered domestic violence tracking and also the inmate tracking over the years. I appreciate the thought and the focusing on this. The question for us when it comes to new projects and new types of programs is how ready the customers are to actually deploy these programs. A lot of times, especially in other countries outside the U.S. and Europe, we see them trying to enter the normal electronic monitoring market, let's say in South America. They seem very excited, and you spend a lot of time and effort, and then at the end, you know, they're not ready for one reason or another to actually deploy something like this. So with, with migrant, like the other ones, we need to understand how, how likely the programs are to actually deployed before we invest significant amount of time and adjustments for them. But we do interact with local partners in any country where we work on these projects, and they give us continuous updates also for stuff like this. So it's not something that we're, that we're crossing off or not emphasizing, and it's something that we continuously look at, but we assess it versus the likelihood of other projects. Like in Romania, they did a new project for electronic monitoring, brand new project for them. They were very serious about it, and you see it also by how quickly they deployed it with us and also continued growth of the project. If we can find customers like that, that are willing to do this on the migrant issue, and they're able to adjust their laws and regulations accordingly, then that'd be great. In Israel, there was an issue with domestic violence, and they've been trying to pass a law for over 10 years, and just last year, they were able to pass it, and then that became a big focus now. And now they're having, you know, the RFP processes around it, which are guided by the government. So we're in touch with all the different players where needed, but the governments are the ones that have to push these laws and regulations for new projects to start. Okay, well, let's hope that you can develop more products so you can enhance the value of the company, because the issue of just diluting the value of the shareholders by writing more shares or doing more outstanding shares is not a winning formula. You need to Yes. Either bid higher on the projects to cover your overhead and to have money for R&D. You know, it's great to get projects, but if you are losing money on contracts, that's no win for anybody. Of course, and we're certainly not losing money on contracts. We're making money on these contracts, and we're actually winning with our technology, not with a low price approach, which some companies employ in some industries. The thing is, these projects are sometimes large, and they require capital, and sometimes we need to raise capital accordingly. And the stock price, you know, our stock price was much higher in the recent past, and the valuations are not always reflective of the intrinsic value of the company. As the intrinsic value is more apparent, it also makes it much easier to raise capital with minimal dilution. You know, we don't control the market, but the market has been sometimes challenging to deal with in terms of valuations over the past two or three years. But we continued to grow and to win projects and deploy in new products. And we're happy with the progress we've achieved, even though we're aware of the dilution, and we're trying to keep that to a minimum as much as possible. Can you get your clients that are interested in giving you an order to upfront you with some of the initial capital costs to process their order? Can they do some upfront loading of giving you some money when they give you a PO? That's a great question. The government's usually the ones that decide the structure of the payment term, these are competitive processes. So, there's five, six, seven players competing on it, and the government says, "these are the payment terms that I want." And, you know, it's hard to come and say, "no, with us, you're going to pay up front, and with everyone else, they're going to pay over time." So sometimes we have the ability to do that, especially when it's an existing customer that's been working with us for many years, because they already have our system and deployed. They already know us, then we have more flexibility. But also, sometimes we don't have that flexibility, and we have to conform to the structure that the customer demands. I understand that. We've been doing it for 35 years. Yeah, yeah. I understand all your responses. I understand that completely. It's just a way of having relationships with a client that makes them understand, "listen, we have the best technology, we have the best product, and you want to come on board with us. Well, we need you to help us and assure us that, or help us to get you the product, so we aren't going into hock to supply you with the product you need. Yeah, and we have those conversations when they allow us to, once a relationship has developed and evolved over the years. It's really an ongoing sensitivity and approach with these government customers that we've been, w e've been working with them for 35 years, because even before the offender monitoring, we've been doing passports and ID cards and driver's licenses, and it's always been that, you know, it's always escorted with the payment terms. It's a big one, part with these government contracts. At the beginning, you have less say, over time, you have more say. When you, when your technology becomes more unique and more prevalent as an industry leader, and that's what we're working on all the time, that's why you keep seeing continued investment in R&D. You have more abilities, and we, we expect and hope over time, as we become larger, our expansion potential is there, and once we manifest it, we'll also be able to improve our terms with, with payments from the customers. But our shift from South America and Africa to the U.S. and Europe has already done a huge amount of, benefit improvement for us in terms of collections, in terms of payment structures. So that's already been a big help for us over the past 5-7 years. And now, even with these, these regions, there is always room for improvement, as we discussed. Well, thank you very much for putting up with me and taking my questions, and I certainly- Good questions. Good Good questions. I have great potential. There seems to be some disconnect with the value of the shares and your potential, and now you have shown that you can do a net profit, which is the critical thing. If you can be consistent with net profits, it's got to improve the value of the shares. Yes. Over time- Thank you. That's what, that's what we hope to happen. And thank you very much for your questions and for your support in SuperCom. Thank you. Once again, if there are any remaining questions or comments, please press star one. At this time, I will pass the call back to Ordan for closing remarks. I want to thank all of you for participating in today's call and for your interest in SuperCom. Please contact us directly if you have any additional questions. We look forward to sharing our progress with you on the next conference calls, filings, and press releases. I thank you, and have a great day. This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.