Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Stellar Bancorp first quarter 2023 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you'll need to press star 11 on your telephone. You'll then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your host today, Courtney Theriot, Chief Accounting Officer. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator, thank you to all who have joined our call today. Good morning. Our team would like to welcome you to our earnings call for the first quarter of 2023. This morning's earnings call will be led by Stellar's CEO, Bob Franklin, and CFO, Paul Egge. Also in attendance today are Steve Retzloff, Executive Chairman of the company, Ray Vitulli, President of the company and CEO of the bank, and Joe West, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the bank. Before we begin, I need to remind everyone that some of the remarks made today constitute forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 as amended. We intend all such statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the act. Note that if we give guidance about future results, that guidance is only a reflection of management's beliefs at the time the statement is made, such beliefs are subject to change. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements except as may be required by law. Please see the last page of the text in this morning's earnings release, which is available on our website at ir.stellarbancorpinc.com for additional information about the risk factors associated with forward-looking statements. At the conclusion of our remarks, we will open the line and allow time for questions. I will now turn the call over to our CEO, Bob Franklin. Thank you, Courtney, and good morning. Welcome to Stellar Bancorp's first quarter earnings call. I will begin by thanking the great team at Stellar Bank for their hard work and dedication in making Stellar truly stellar. During the long weekend provided in February, our team completed a successful system conversion of our merged banks, bringing all Stellar Bank customers onto one system. Our staff worked tirelessly to get this right, and I congratulate them on their success. The other major event during the quarter cannot go without mention, the failure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. These failures stunned and stressed our industry and the customers we serve. Despite the suddenness of the failures, Stellar Bank has strong relationships with its customers, developed over many years that form our customer base. Though we face some deposit runoff during the quarter, some seasonal, some due to rate, some frightened by media reports. The team will give some more granular information around deposits, but I would be remiss in not thanking our incredible customers who have supported our bank as the industry experiences stress. In the wake of these failures, we saw again that the closeness to the customer is what fuels confidence in local institutions. We have relied on those customers, and they have relied on us, and we believe that that will continue. Since the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates, we have concentrated our efforts on building capital, managing liquidity, and maintaining our credit quality. We believe that these efforts are paying dividends as we continue to work to maintain our strong core funded franchise. We continue to gain efficiencies as we learn to operate together as one organization. We have made a concentrated effort to maintain our margins in a difficult operating environment, with some in our markets paying much higher interest rates. We have strengthened our underwriting to help combat the effects of rapidly rising interest rate. Today, our customers remain strong, and our markets are good. As we move through the balance of the year, we will continue to be mindful of our core franchise and building capital, maintaining liquidity, and strengthening our credit underwriting. Our goal is to be well-positioned as the Federal Reserve finishes its work to take advantage of the opportunities that we believe will be available. I remind our shareholders that we reside in one of the most robust markets in the United States. The future of Stellar is bright. Now I'll turn this over to Paul Egge, our CFO. Thanks, Bob. Good morning, everybody. We are very pleased to report strong operating performance for what was a very challenging quarter for our industry due to the cumulative effects of quantitative tightening and the fallout from a couple of high-profile bank failures in March. Our net income in the first quarter was $37.1 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $0.70, an annualized ROA of 1.38% and a return on tangible common equity of 19.32%. All this was notwithstanding approximately $6.2 million in merger expenses and modest reserve build during the quarter. This is our second quarter together at Stellar and a quarter removed from what was a very noisy initial post-merger quarter. It is gratifying to see progress on nearly every earnings line item and metric on both a stated and adjusted basis. We experienced incremental gains in efficiency and our level Core pre-tax, pre-provision earnings power in the first quarter, reflected in our adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision ROAA of 1.99%. Our earnings power and bottom line results were driven by a strong net interest margin of 4.80% in the quarter versus 4.71% in the fourth quarter of 2022, which was thanks in part to $10 million of purchase accounting accretion, up from about $8.2 million in the fourth quarter. Excluding purchase accounting accretion, our adjusted NIM was strong and stable at 4.38%, equal to our adjusted net interest margin in the previous quarter. We're very pleased with our ability to maintain such strong NIM despite the culmination of industry pressures in the first quarter impacting our cost of funds. From a balance sheet perspective, we feel as though our focus as we entered to 2023 on maintaining flexibility on the liquidity front has proven strategic for us. During late January, we sold approximately $320 million in predominantly longer duration municipal securities at a slight gain to put us in a position to leverage relative deposit pricing discipline and to not have to chase more price sensitive deposits seeking effectively wholesale rates due to the cumulative effect of quantitative tightening. In the current backdrop, our primary goal is to keep our core funding core and to maintain strong margins in pre-tax, pre-provision earnings power. We're seeking to prudently manage the liability side of the balance sheet to maintain core funding with a willingness to shrink and/or backfill with wholesale funding sources as we allow our assets to reprice and the funding environment to stabilize. Deposits at March 31 were $8.7 billion, a decrease of $529 million or 5.8% from $9.3 billion at year-end. The majority of this decrease in deposits actually occurred before the failures of SVB and Signature in March, and approximately $186 million of our decrease in deposits during the quarter came from seasonality in our government banking group. Among the principal drivers, broadly speaking, were seasonality, industry-wide pressures, and our strategy of maintaining relative discipline in the face of an intensely competitive market for deposits. Through all this, we retained a favorable mix of non-interest-bearing deposits representing 44.4% of the total. Digging deeper into our deposit base, our average account balance was $81,000 after excluding government deposits. At the end of the quarter, our uninsured deposits, net of collateralized deposits, were about $4.1 billion or 46.4% of deposits. We believe our access to contingent sources of liquidity outlined in page seven of our accompanying investor presentation compares favorably to our uninsured deposits, net of collateralized deposits of approximately $4 billion. Immediate liquidity sources of $4.5 billion covers about 110% of these balances. When you add policy-driven capacity for broker deposits, total liquidity sources covers about 149% of uninsured deposits, net of collateral deposits. In summary, we feel good about our liquidity position and our ability to manage the liability side of the balance sheet, stay core funded, and maintain strong margins and earnings power. In the meantime, our ability to harvest strong earnings will help us build capital and grow our tangible book value at a nice clip. During the quarter, tangible book value per share increased 8.7% from $14.02 per share to $15.24 per share, and tangible equity to tangible assets increased to 8.15% from 7.24% in the fourth quarter. Contributing to our capital build in the near term will be the recognition of predominantly interest-based purchase accounting accretion from the merger more than offsetting the accelerated amortization of our core deposit and tangible assets from the merger. At the end of the quarter, we had $144 million in loan discount remaining and a core deposit and tangible asset of $136.7 million. Strong credit continues to be a strategic focus, and we are pleased with credit performance so far in 2023. Although non-performing assets have ticked down and net charge-offs have been minimal, we took a provision of $3.7 million relative to modest loan growth of just over $130 million, putting our allowance for credit losses to total loans at 1.22% at the end of the quarter. If the first quarter has taught us anything, it is to manage liquidity, capital and credit to be ready for a wide range of economic outcomes and even shocks to the system. We believe Stellar is well positioned to manage through a challenging operating environment and thrive. Our confidence is driven by the strategic and financial underpinnings of our merger to create Stellar, our franchise value and credit profile from operating in one of the best markets in the U.S., and perhaps most importantly, the Stellar team that's making it all happen. Thank you. I will now turn the call back over to Bob. Thank you, Paul. Operator, I think we'll open it for questions. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one one on your telephone. Our first question comes from Eric Spector with Raymond James. Hey, good morning, everybody. This is Eric on the line for David Feaster. Thanks for taking the questions. Just wanted to dig a little bit more into deposit trends in the quarter. As you could say, some of the attribution, just, if you could talk about how flows played out over the course of the quarter and what the drivers were. What cash deployments was for, whether it was clients migrating out of the bond market or paying down higher cost debt, and like how you can stabilize early here in two Q. Any color on that would be great. We see a lot of the flows driven by rate seeking, and that's really consistent with most of our outflows being before the stress as a byproduct of the rate changes. We really didn't see account closures, in, meaningfully higher than typical. We see an increased level of sweeping excess funds. Ray might be able to add a little bit of color. Yeah, Eric. The portion of the outflows, and that if you think about it in a waterfall, that's not the open and not the close. The majority came in what we call the carried, just the balance of the existing portfolio. When you look at that, do a little deeper dive into that, you just see basically some outflows, but not what I would say, you know, material bleeding down of the balances in those existing customers. It's just like Paul said, there was some sweeping out, probably a little bit rate seeking, but we feel good about the stability of that in that section of our, what we call our carried and the behavior in there. Also, as Paul mentioned, about a third of the outflows were in our government banking group, which is a scheduled and the normal behavior of that. The other thing I do wanna add is that, you know, during the quarter, Bob mentioned, we successfully had a conversion. You know, we're already close to our customers, but we're extremely close to the customers, kind of mid-quarter, right around this time, kind of giving white glove treatment to our power users, treasury customers to assist them through the conversion. Got it. That's helpful color. I was just curious if you could touch on just loan repricing dynamics and what you're seeing, just like how new loan yields are trending versus flow off rates, and any color around the repricing front would be helpful. Sure. We originated about $530 million of loans in the quarter, and that came on at a rate. Face amount of those loans is at 7.59%, up almost 100 basis points from the fourth quarter loan originations. Really pleased there. Not uncommon to renew about the same amount. The renewed loans came on at 7.63%, off of a rate that was 6.92%, the prior rate. Yeah, we have a repricing opportunity, and we're delivering on that. Now is probably a good time to stress the repricing opportunity that we had on October 1 of the entire acquired portfolio from Legacy CBTx. In what effectively was an interest rate mark of that portfolio, we repriced the entire loan portfolio right then and there. Really, the purchase accounting accretion that you see is a heck of a lot more recurring than a typical credit-driven purchase accounting discount in that when those loans, if rates stay the same and when those loans reprice, they're gonna be repricing back at today's market rates. We just got to pull that forward. We see that as meaningful recurring revenue if rates were to continue to stay higher for longer. Got it. That's helpful. Just kind of going off that, just curious where you're seeing good risk-adjusted returns at this point, if there's any segments you're kind of throttling back on, and just where you're cautious, where you see more opportunity? I think we're taking a very cautious approach to new credit, especially in the Commercial Real Estate part of the market. We're presented with opportunities all the time with loans that are maturing at other banks and coming our way. We're just taking really a pure go slow approach on that. We don't wanna add to that space unless there are strategic opportunities, and we wanna keep, you know, the dry powder available for our existing customers and be able to meet their needs. They're customers that are maintaining good deposit balances. We're being very, very cautious in that space, looking for, to make new credits, looking for, credit enhancements, however that may be, additional guarantors, collateral, the pledge of liquid assets to back it up. We're being very cautious in that space, knowing that there'll be some opportunities come to us now and then, but just it's a time to be pretty cautious about that and just emphasize, you know, the quality of the credit. Okay. Is there anywhere that you see attractive risk-adjusted returns? Obviously, you're cautious on CRE, but is there any areas that look a little bit more attractive, or you're getting rewarded for the risk that you take? Just looking at your pipeline early here in two Q and, whatnot. Just color there would be helpful. You know, in the quarter of the hundred and so billion that we did generate in loan growth, that came from, there was C&I component in there, which, you know, we do a good job underwriting those loans, and that was nice to see some C&I in there. It was also, kind of split, of the CREs split just like our portfolio of owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied. We had a piece of residential construction. You know, we still have extremely strong market in Houston, and we do a good job on the residential construction side, and that's reflected in the growth for the first quarter as well. Anyone that brings along nice deposits along with the loan. We don't look at loans in isolation, so we want both sides of the relationship. Folks that are just shopping loans, we don't have a lot of interest in at this point. Right. That seems like a good approach, obviously, at this point. Appreciate you guys taking the questions, and I'll step back. Thank you. Our next question comes from Matt Olney with Stephens. Hey, thanks. Good morning. Can you hear me? Yeah. Hey, Matt. Great. Paul, I think you mentioned in the prepared remarks that the bank sold some securities in the first quarter to help improve the liquidity profile of the bank. Would love to appreciate just kind of where the appetite is from here for additional sales. We continue to evaluate these dynamics. The opportunity to sell securities in January was kind of the rare no-brainer, where the tax equivalent yield was lower than what we could put the money at in the Fed, and we took a ton of duration and AOCI risk off the books. If the stars line up again and there's an opportunity like that, we kind of have our heads on a swivel. We don't feel like we have to seek that at this point, and we're gonna have a pretty decent amount of cash flow coming off the securities book here in the next, 12 months and 24 and 36 months. We feel good, we're gonna continue to be opportunistic as we were in January. Okay. Just following up on your points there, any update on kind of what the duration of the overall securities book is now versus 12/31 after that trade and then those securities cash flows, any kind of ballpark number you can give us as far as expectations over the next year? Sure. The next three years each expect around $200 million in cash flows coming off the securities portfolio. We're pretty pleased with our effective duration. Every month, we're walking down the yield curve. As of 3/31, effectively, we were at 4.29 years, and we feel good about kind of the overall stance of that portfolio. Okay. Thanks for that. Then on the expense side, I think when we adjust out those merger charges, I think the first quarter levels came in below expectations. Any color on just how much of the cost saves have been recognized so far, what's still remaining? Then just any update to that full year number of expenses that I think you pointed towards last time on the call? Sure. We feel like we're on plan. We feel good about the nature of our kind of merger-adjusted core expense base guidance that we gave earlier. Naturally, we're being very mindful of revenue dynamics and how we evaluate expense, but everything is moving according to plan. Just to follow up on that, Paul, as far as the cost savings, I think you mentioned the last quarter was $265 million for the full year. It seems like we're essentially at that run rate right now in the first quarter. Should we see any improvement, any declines in that first quarter? Or do you think we're at a run rate now where we'll see some kind of flatten out or even modest build? We've had a little bit of the first quarter featured certain seasonal noise as well as merger adjustments, and we had a big conversion this quarter. We kind of, as we go forward, we see it as establishing flatline status, obviously with that being highly dependent on how things, more variable expenses go, such as bonus accruals and really any audibles we make with respect to the plan. Okay. Good. I think you guys noted that the tangible book value per share improved nicely. I I think it was up 9% in the quarter. That AOCI position still, I think, negative $113 million. Any color as far as kind of recapturing that amount over the next few years? We'll certainly recapture it as we walk down the yield curve. We recaptured a good bit in that January securities trade, not because there was a meaningful gain, but it's really about the AOCI risk that we took off the table. We feel that as we walk down the yield curve, we're gonna see that shrink ratably. And ultimately, it's a function of how we decide to reinvest funds as well, but all that will be at market. We feel good about where we sit and especially the relative side to that AOCI position with respect to our capital. We are in a position that if push came to shove or we thought that it made sense to sell each and every security in our book, we don't put our capital status even close to at risk. We feel like that's a good position to be in. That's not our intention, but we feel like we have a good amount of flexibility, and I think it's symbolic of the way we're trying to run the bank with a focus on capital, credit and liquidity and maintaining a great measure of flexibility. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Okay. All right. Just lastly, I wanna give Joe some airtime here. Any more color on within the CRE bucket, the office exposure, in terms of kind of what that exposure is or any color you can give as far as puts and takes around the exposure there at the bank? Hey, Matt, let me jump on that and then turn it over to Joe. The, you know, we talked about before, the granularity in the office loan type, you know, our average loan size in that category is $773,000. You see right there kind of the granularity. Also if you take if you just look at the non-owner-occupied piece of that represents about 4.2% of our total loan portfolio. Extremely manageable and, again, with about 50% owner-occupied, the other non. I'll turn over to Joe for some more color. Yeah, Matt, the if you look at that portfolio and look at the individual properties within it, they typically, on the larger size of that's in our portfolio, there's suburban office buildings, three, four, five story type buildings. We basically stay in that range. They have good occupancy. Only one is in downtown Houston, and it's just, you know, under $5 million of a loan balance. It's not a big building. It's a smaller building downtown. Most of our exposure in this space is scattered in the suburban markets, primarily around Houston, a few in Beaumont, and that's that type of properties. One in Dallas. One in Dallas, yeah. Okay. Thanks, guys. Appreciate it. Thanks, Matt. Thank you, Matt. Our next question comes from Will Jones with KBW. Hey, great. Good morning, guys. Good morning. Good morning. I wanted to go back to the loan yield discussion for just a minute. Ray, that was helpful, the data point you gave us on where you're renewing loans and where you're originating loans today. It's obviously well above, you know, where the portfolio is yielding today. Could you just help us guide us and maybe walk us through where you see the loan yields trending as we continue throughout the year here? I don't know if you guys have, you know, a loan beta expectation, if you will. Just any kind of help on where you see loan yields going from here would be great. Thanks. Well, sure. Yeah, those, you know, at all there's a waterfall for all that. If you take those components that I mentioned earlier around new loan yields and then what's happening in the advances and payoffs, the kind of beginning to end of the waterfall went from, on the whole portfolio, weighted average went from 5.56%- 5.76%. All of that that happened in the quarter allowed us to pick up 20 basis points on the whole portfolio. You know, I guess the thought would be that if we continue to originate at these levels with similar, that we would pick up, continue to pick up, some increases on the whole portfolio. I don't know if, Paul, you have anything to add to that. No. Get really good quarter in that. It was, you know, we're seeing in committee and seeing that we're loans that are in the pipeline are coming in at that, and maybe even a little bit higher of what we, of what we reported for the coupon in the first quarter. Okay, great. That's helpful. Then, you know, as you think about the margin story as a whole, you have, you know, some more benefit coming from, you know, asset repricing, you know, but at the same time, deposit betas and deposit costs, you know, are kind of accelerating here. Do you feel like, you know, the margin has really kind of peaked and we may be, you know, on a decline here? Or how do you feel like the margin will trend as we continue throughout the year here? I feel extremely proud of the organization's ability to maintain such strong margins. I feel good about our ability to maintain such high absolute value margins. It's hard to be bullish with respect to it expanding from here. Everything that we're willing to do is in an effort to protect our high level of margins in the current environment. Last quarter, I didn't think that we'd do as great of a job maintaining our margin and we did, so I don't wanna sell it short. It's hard to imagine that we can do anything other than maintain. It'd be a great win to maintain. Market pressures on deposits continues and that's not gonna stop. We are able to put loans on at pretty good rates. Our expectation is to try to defend our margin a bit. That's what we're gonna attempt to do. Okay, great. Yeah. Maybe it's worth noting just how competitive the deposit market's been. There's a heck of a lot of moving parts there on margin, but we feel as well positioned as anyone to fight that battle. Awesome. That's great. I'd, yeah, I'd echo that. It's definitely a win to keep the margin stable in this environment. I would echo that sentiment there. Then, just lastly for me, guys, on loan growth, it feels like, you know, maybe you grew loans at a, you know, a little better pace than, you know, you were expecting to or at least relative to that low to mid single-digit guide you gave last quarter. Do you feel like this gives you any more confidence or maybe conviction is a better word, that you could grow loans at, you know, more the upper part of that guidance? Maybe we even see it drift to the high single digit range as we go through the year, or do you still stay conservative here and just kind of stay the course on loan growth? I think it's staying the course that what we've been talking about when you look at the results of the first quarter, that's, you know, of course that was. I think that's indicative of at least what, you know, at least what we're looking at for the next quarter. Not sure what'll happen in the back half of the year, but I think the answer is that mid-single digit is probably still where we're thinking. It's not any more. Okay, great. Thanks, guys. Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, that is star one one. Our next question comes from Brad Milsaps with Piper Sandler. Hey, good morning. Hey, Brad. Good morning. Thanks for, thanks for taking my questions. You guys have addressed a lot. Paul, I did wanna follow up on the margin. I think you guys have shown something like a 16% cumulative deposit beta, maybe a 31% interest-bearing, to date. Just wanted to get a sense of kind of where you think, you know, those are ultimately headed and where they could top out? Yeah. Our cumulative beta to date, you nailed it. That's. Comes right on top of my numbers. In the Q1, unfortunately for all deposits, it was about 43% and for interest-bearing it was unfortunately closer to 80%. There's definitely a measure of catch-up being played in what is an intensely competitive deposit market. We're pleased to be close to the end of the rate hike cycle, and we certainly hope that that's the case. That's why we are managing our balance sheet for maximum flexibility. Really what isn't shown here is probably your core customer data. What we're focused on is strong core customer relationships that support both sides of the balance sheet. When you peel out what we believe to be temporary wholesale funds as we seek out to kind of grow customers, that core beta is even lower. It's all about what we're trying to do. We feel like being close to the company, close to our customers is what's gonna drive our customer acquisition and ultimately customer retention. That's what makes us special. Ultimately we're gonna seek to drive value on the liability side of the balance sheet, and core funding is where it's at. I certainly appreciate all that, but I guess maybe. I appreciate your, you know, willingness to wanna try to stabilize the margin, but just trying to kind of drill down on the facts a little bit, maybe, you know, what betas would be sort of driving, you know, that forecast. If I look, I mean, your lowest cost category shifted into your, you know, higher cost, you know, CDs brokered, you know, FHLB advances. I mean, it would seem that the core NIM would, you know, just the math of it would have kind of a decent, you know, step down from kind of this, you know, 4.38% number in the first quarter. Just trying to get a sense of that magnitude. You know, I can't speak to the magnitude, but you're right to not be hugely bullish on NIM. We feel well positioned, but it's really harder to comment on the magnitude. The pressure is there. Okay. Got it. 100%. It's funding. Okay, got it. Just on the accretion, thanks for the update on what you guys have left. The pace I know is difficult to predict, but, you know, just kinda curious kinda what you might, you know, expect, you know, this year or next, just from a, you know, from a scheduled standpoint. You know, you're absolutely right. We did not expect to be banking $10 million of accretion income in the first quarter. The pace of our recognition was planned to be more like six and a half or $7 million a quarter. We benefited from what folks might call a measure of windfall accretion in excess. We just didn't expect the loans to pay down because ultimately that's what drives this. In the current rate environment you're gonna have people selling assets and ultimately, or for one reason or another, paying down loans early. We didn't expect to have as much. Our expectation now that we've seen the first quarter behavior, is probably gonna be a little bit north of what we initially had planned for the year. I don't want to well, I'm certainly not banking on another $10 million of accretion income. When you think about what's scheduled, think about more in the terms of $6.5 million or so. You know, there's probably some upside to that. Naturally, we can't predict the future and/or the behavior, when I think about that accretion income, there's maybe we'll provide better info on this in the future. There's the scheduled accretion income which is what I posit to be recurring revenue because those loans will either reprice or be replaced by new market-based loans. It's that excess that comes from, you know, excess or windfall that comes from accelerated pay downs that doesn't fall into that category. Got it. Maybe just final bigger picture question for you or Bob. you know, you guys are accreting capital at a relatively fast pace, and it seems like you'll continue to do so, particularly with the accretion coming back. any thoughts around a buyback or is the environment as such, you know, like most banks have said, it's too volatile right now, too much uncertainty to even, you know, think about that as you get later in the year as the capital ratios continue to climb higher? Well, I think, Brad, right now the, it's certainly in the back of our mind, but I'd say it's in the back of our mind as we accrete capital. We wanna get through this uncertainty of what's happening out there. I think as we get through that and understand better where we are and what our capital levels need to be and the growth that we wanna achieve, we'll look at buybacks, look at dividends, look at several things. We wanna be well-positioned as we get to the other side of this thing and the Fed stops doing what it's doing to really look at opportunities out there. We're trying to position ourselves to have all the options available to us. In that vein, we do have an active, authorization. Right. That's helpful. Paul, just kind of final two housekeeping. Still expect the tax rate just to touch under 20%. Is the Durbin impact still about, I don't know, half a million or $600,000 a quarter starting in the second half? Is that still the number to think about? Yes. No reason, no updates on that front. The tax rate has crept up a tad by virtue of having sold some of our muni book. The current quarter's a fine run rate here. Maybe a hair lower going forward. Perfect. Thank you, guys. I appreciate it. Thank you. Thanks. That concludes today's question and answer session. I'd like to turn the call back to Bob Franklin for closing remarks. Thank you. Thank you for everyone's interest today in Stellar Bancorp. With that, I think our call is done. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.