Good afternoon, and welcome to the Seagate Technology fourth quarter and fiscal year 2024 conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Shayne Hudson, Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you. Hello, everyone, and welcome to today's call. Joining me are Dave Mosley, Seagate's Chief Executive Officer, and Gianluca Romano, our Chief Financial Officer. We posted our earnings press release and detailed supplemental information for our June quarter results on the investor section of our website. During today's call, we'll refer to GAAP and non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP figures are reconciled to GAAP figures in the earnings press release posted on our website and included in our Form 8-K. We've not reconciled certain non-GAAP outlook measures because material items that may impact these measures are out of our control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted. Therefore, reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measures is not available without unreasonable effort. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's call contains forward-looking statements that reflect management's current views and assumptions based on information available to us as of today and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent date. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by these forward-looking statements, as they're subject to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. To learn more about the risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may affect our future business results, please refer to the press release issued today and in our SEC filings, including our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly report on Form 10-Q, as well as the supplemental information, all of which may be found on the investors section of our website. Following our prepared remarks, we'll open the call for questions. In order to provide all analysts with the opportunity to participate, we thank you in advance for asking just one primary question and then re-entering the queue. I'll now hand the call over to you, Dave. Thank you, Shayne, and hello, everyone. Seagate ended fiscal 2024 on a high note, reflecting strong operational execution and more favorable supply-demand dynamics. Fourth quarter revenue increased 18% year-on-year, supported by strengthening global cloud demand. We achieved non-GAAP gross margin of nearly 31% at the company level, supported by HDD gross margins that were above that level and at the top end of our long-term target range. These results, along with ongoing expense discipline, led to non-GAAP EPS of $1.05, far exceeding the high end of our guidance range. At the start of the fiscal year, we highlighted three financial priorities, namely to increase profitability, drive cash generation, and strengthen our balance sheet. Reflecting on our full-year performance, we delivered on all three. Our results were due, in part, to the build-to-order, or BTO, strategy that we put in place to provide greater supply-demand predictability and optimize our cash resources. For fiscal 2024, we expanded non-GAAP operating profit by 64%, grew free cash flow sequentially every quarter of the fiscal year, and maintained healthy liquidity levels. As we enter the new fiscal year with operating and financial momentum in an improving demand environment, executing our mass capacity product roadmap is a top priority. In the September quarter, we expect to complete the HAMR-based Mozaic 3+ product qualification with our lead CSP partner. We've also started to ramp our 28-terabyte PMR SMR product platform, drives, in high volume. These two product advancements align well with the strengthening nearline demand environment. I'll share further details around our product execution momentarily, but first, I'll briefly review the current market trends. As I highlighted a moment ago, we are seeing strong nearline cloud demand growth from customers globally. Fourth quarter nearline cloud revenue more than doubled from the year-ago period, and we expect growth to continue in fiscal 2025. We attribute the underlying demand drivers to an increase from both traditional cloud computing workloads as well as new AI-related deployments. We believe this demand rebound follows a period of deferred HDD storage investments by cloud providers as they prioritize spending towards compute-intensive infrastructure. While cloud service providers are continuing to build out that infrastructure, they increasingly focus on developing, deploying, and monetizing AI applications. This involves both training of large language models and expanding the entire hardware stack to support future generative AI content-driven growth. While HDD demand pull-through related to AI is still relatively small, we believe HDDs will play a crucial role in enabling both of these phases of the AI adoption curve. By offering cost-efficient, scalable storage solutions, HDDs are ideal for maintaining the integrity of AI training datasets as well as preserving the valuable content that AI engines are projected to generate in the future. In the enterprise OEM markets, we observed a gradual improvement in demand for the second consecutive quarter and continue to project stronger growth in the second half of the calendar year, driven by both modest improvement in traditional server unit demand and increased exabyte content. We've also started to see incremental demand for higher-density storage-specific solutions, due in part to enterprises putting storage capacity in place either on-prem or in private clouds as they prepare for future AI applications. Finally, turning to the VIA markets, sales of our VIA products came in better than we expected in the June quarter, while customer inventory remains at healthy levels. We expect VIA sales will likely fluctuate a bit in the second half of the calendar year off of this higher base. Global demand indications for smart city projects remain strong, but near-term budget visibility for these projects is mixed in many markets amid the current global macro uncertainty. Overall, the end-market demand trends are solidly pointing to long-term growth opportunities for mass capacity storage. Demand recovery for our high-capacity nearline drives has been faster than anticipated, which has extended product lead times and led to tighter overall supply conditions. Based on our current outlook, our nearline exabyte supply is committed through the end of the calendar year. These trends underscore the relevance of our BTO strategy, which is intended to provide greater demand predictability for Seagate and supply assurance for our customers. In this environment, we are working with our customers to obtain better demand visibility and address their exabyte growth needs through product transitions while maintaining a strong focus on profitability and supply discipline. As noted last quarter, we are executing the qualification and ramp of 2 new high-capacity drives. Transitioning to these higher-capacity products enables Seagate to profitably expand exabyte shipment volume with our existing head-and-disk production capacity while also supporting our customers' growing data demand and TCO needs. Customer acceptance of our new PMR product continues to gain momentum. These drives, which offer capacities of up to 28 TB, have demonstrated solid yield, quality, and performance today. With numerous customers now qualified spanning the cloud, enterprise, and VIA markets, and several more planned to complete in the coming months, volume ramp is already underway. In the June quarter, we shipped a small volume of HAMR-based Mozaic drives for revenue to non-cloud customers. Consistent with our recent public commentary, our lead CSP customer is validating drives built with the improved process controls and new firmware optimized for their specific workloads. Testing on these drives is progressing to plan, and we expect to complete qualification and begin shipping them revenue units later in the September quarter. Based on our confidence in the technology and experience on this product platform, we are proceeding to launch new HAMR qualifications with the expectation to have multiple U.S. and China cloud customers' calls underway this quarter. We estimate these qualifications will take around three quarters on average to complete, which points to a broader volume ramp toward mid-calendar 2025. We are leveraging all of our learnings and pushing the pace of development on our next generation of HAMR drives, the Mozaic 4+. Mozaic 4+ offers 33% more capacity compared with the HAMR drives that we're shipping today, with minimal changes to the bill of materials. This illustrates the central value proposition of the Mozaic platform, namely the technology's ability to scale drive capacity through areal density gains rather than adding heads and disks. This capability is enabling Seagate to deliver significant cost benefits to our customers, as well as offer power and space advantages that are particularly valuable for data center operators as they expand cloud and AI infrastructure. For example, each data center slot loaded with one of our Mozaic 3+ drives offers three times the storage capacity relative to the average capacity of nearline drives in our installed base and consumes about 70% less power per terabyte. These represent tremendous savings opportunities for data centers at exabyte scale. We are hearing from customers directly, including CSPs, that HDDs already play a crucial role in extracting value from data in the early stages of AI application deployment. As GenAI engines mature, customers expect an acceleration in content creation that will lead to significant demand for mass capacity storage. We recognize that GenAI is still in its early stages of adoption. However, this customer feedback, combined with our early engagements with nearline cloud and OEM customers, reinforces our view that mass capacity storage will be a beneficiary in both the cloud and at the edge as the adoption of these new exciting applications takes hold. I'll stop there and pass the call over to Gianluca. Thank you, Dave. Seagate delivered a strong June quarter financial performance underscored by double-digit revenue growth on both a sequential and year-over-year basis, with profitability exceeding the high end of our guidance range. For the June quarter, revenue was $1.89 billion, up 14% quarter-over-quarter and 18% year-over-year. Non-GAAP operating income was up 79% sequentially to $327 million, leading to a non-GAAP operating margin of 17% of revenue, expanding 620 basis points quarter-over-quarter. Our non-GAAP EPS was $1.05, exceeding the high end of our guidance range, reflecting the improving exabyte demand trends, ongoing price adjustment, and continued cost discipline. Within our hard disk drive business, exabyte shipments grew 15% sequentially to 114 exabytes, while revenue increased 17% to $1.7 billion. Growing demand for our mass capacity products more than offset a sequential decline in the legacy and non- HDD businesses. Within the mass capacity market, revenue increased 22% sequentially to $1.4 billion, driven by strengthening global nearline cloud demand, along with an improvement in the VIA market. Mass capacity shipments totaled 104 exabytes, compared with 89 exabytes in the March quarter, up 17% sequentially. Mass capacity shipments now represent more than 90% of total HDD exabytes, reflecting the continued long-term secular growth for cost-efficient, scalable storage. Seagate's nearline product portfolio has us well-positioned to address this growing demand. In the June quarter, nearline shipments totaled 84 exabytes, up quarter-over-quarter from 72 exabytes. Expect demand will continue to improve from global CSPs as well as nearline enterprise customers into the back half of calendar 2024. As Dave mentioned, demand for our VIA product was better than we had forecasted in the June quarter, which is more a function of order timing as our VIA revenue outlook for the calendar year has not changed. Finally, legacy product revenue was $290 million, while revenue for our non-HDD business was $160 million, both down slightly on a sequential basis and lower than expected at the beginning of the quarter. Moving on to the rest of the income statement, non-GAAP gross profit increased sequentially by $151 million in the June quarter to $583 million, which represents a 45% increase in gross profit compared with similar revenue levels in the December 2022 quarter. Importantly, we achieved a non-GAAP gross margin of 30.9% at the company level, which is well inside our long-term margin range. Overall, non-GAAP gross margin expanded by 480 basis points quarter-over-quarter, which was faster than we had originally anticipated. As Dave noted, margins for hard disk drive business were notably higher than the corporate margin. Our outperformance is supported by continued price adjustment, favorable mix shift toward mass capacity products, and ongoing cost efficiencies. Underutilization cost decreased to roughly $20 million compared to $43 million in the previous quarter. We expect underutilization costs will be minimal going forward, reflecting the improving demand environment. Non-GAAP operating expenses totaled $256 million, up 3% quarter-over-quarter, roughly in line with our plans. Adjusted EBITDA continued to improve and was up 45% sequentially in the June quarter to $404 million. Non-GAAP net income strongly increased to $222 million, resulting in a non-GAAP EPS of $1.05 per share, based on a diluted share count of approximately 212 million shares. Moving on to cash flow and the balance sheet, in the June quarter, cash and cash equivalents totaled $1.4 billion, including $560 million, representing a majority of the proceeds from the sales of our SoC assets announced in April. From an accounting perspective, we recorded $226 million of the proceeds in operational cash flow, which are net of transaction costs and related to our long-term SoC purchase agreement. The remaining proceeds are reflected in invested cash inflow. Capital expenditures for the quarter were down 10% to $54 million. For fiscal 2024, capex spending was $254 million, which is just below the low end of our target 4%-6% of revenue. Looking out to fiscal 2025, we will maintain capital discipline and currently expect capex to be at the low end of the target range. cash flow generation was $380 million, including the $226 million noted earlier from the SoC divestiture. As a reminder, we plan to use a portion of these proceeds to support our supply chain. With this in mind, we expect free cash flow in the September quarter to be at or slightly above break-even. We returned $147 million to shareholders through the quarterly dividend, exiting the quarter with 210 million shares outstanding. We closed the June quarter with $2.9 billion in available liquidity, including our undrawn revolving credit facility. With cash and cash equivalents of $1.4 billion, net debt decreased 11% to $4.4 billion at the end of the June quarter. Other income and expenses were $81 million, down from $85 million in the prior quarter, and reflecting higher interest income from improved cash balance and relatively flat interest expenses. Turning now to our outlook, we expect mass capacity revenue to trend higher in the September quarter, and more than offset lower sales into the legacy markets. We continue to see demand growth from global cloud customers, as well as a modest improvement in the nearline enterprise market. We expect gross margin to benefit from a richer mix of mass capacity revenue and ongoing pricing actions. With that as context, September quarter revenue is expected to be in a range of $2.1 billion ± $150 million, an increase of 11% sequentially and 44% year-over-year at the midpoint. We are planning for non-GAAP operating expenses of approximately $270 million, which include costs associated with reinstating our variable compensation plan. As a midpoint of our revenue guidance, we expect non-GAAP operating margin to be in the 18% range. We expect our non-GAAP EPS to be $1.40, plus or minus $0.20, based on a diluted share count of approximately 213 million shares and a non-GAAP tax expense of $15 million-$20 million. Our results reflect our supply discipline and strong focus on profitability. I will now turn the call back to Dave for final comments. Thanks, Gianluca. I'm pleased with our strong performance exiting fiscal 2024, which reflects our team's unwavering focus on improving profitability and driving cash generation, two key financial imperatives. As we enter fiscal 2025, amid improving nearline cloud and enterprise demand, we will focus on supporting exabyte growth through product transitions. We are working closely with customers to address their data storage needs through two new high-capacity products, including the Mozaic 3+ HAMR drives. We remain confident in the HAMR technology, which provides our customers with cost-efficient, scalable storage that we believe will prove critical in an era where data holds unprecedented value. We want to thank our global teams for their creativity and perseverance over the last several quarters that have helped us achieve the results that we announced today. Our structural performance improvements, coupled with a favorable demand environment and differentiated technology roadmap, position us well for years to come. We also wish to thank our suppliers for your support and our customers and shareholders for placing your trust in Seagate. Gianluca and I are now ready to open up the call for questions. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. Our first question today is from Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Yes, thank you so much. Dave, you mentioned that nearline capacity is committed through end of calendar 2024. How should we think about the market coming more in supply-demand balance, and when do you think that would happen? Or maybe asking it another way, how long would it take for you to add incremental capacity, and how do we square that with the low end of CapEx for fiscal 2025? Comments from Gianluca. Thank you. Thanks, Wamsi. Yes, we are being very careful with adding more capacity. It's good news seeing the demand come back to the extent that it has, but it's still not back to the levels it was a couple of years ago. And if you'll recall, we took something like 25% of the capacity offline, and we let a bunch of people go. And so we've been hiring a lot of the people back, but we're still pretty far away from the supply capabilities that we had years ago. What we're doing right now is trying to get predictable, so making sure that with the supply that we do have, we're getting it booked, and that's why we had the confidence through the end of the calendar year. Then we're trying to drive product transitions, which helps us answer the call for exabyte demand with the new products and making sure we get that booked so that people are committed to the qualifications and then can have access to that technology as well, which obviously helps us rebuild the industry and the margins that we have. We can share that with suppliers as well. Just that predictability is our priority right now, not adding more capacity. Okay, thanks. If I could, really quick one for Gianluca. In your guide of the gross margin improvement, right, as you've gone through the last few quarters, you've been seeing material step function changes in your gross margin as some of these underutilization charges have gone away on these higher revenues. As you think about this quarter-on-quarter into September and beyond, it seems that the gross margin improvement is sort of asymptoting. And I'm wondering, is that more because of the ramp and qualification around HAMR and sort of where those volumes are this year, or should we think that we won't get as much leverage on gross margins over the next few quarters? How should we be thinking about that? Thank you so much. Thank you, Wamsi. Well, I would say, first of all, we are very satisfied with the trend in our gross margin. This quarter, I mean, the June quarter was even a bit higher than what we were expecting, so we went a little bit faster on both the pricing actions and the reduction in our internal cost. This is going on. We expect this to happen again in the September quarter. It's always difficult to perfectly estimate how much will be the impact for the full quarter. As you know, volume is going up, so the underutilization charges will decline even more in September, and we don't really expect this cost to be impacting the company through fiscal 2025. And then, of course, because of the supply-demand balance now is a bit different than what was in the past, we still expect some improvement on the pricing action. Everything is reflected in our guidance, and the trend is continuing and is going in the right direction. Okay, thank you so much. Thank you. The next question is from Asiya Merchant with Citigroup. Please go ahead. Great. Thank you for taking my question. The guide talks about improving enterprise storage demand from your enterprise OEM customers. How much visibility is there, and how do you feel about the sustainability of that demand as the quarters progress? Thank you. Thanks, Asiya. I would say that the visibility is not as good as what we have from the CSPs today, but it's been a fairly sharp downturn in on-prem enterprise as well over the last year. So talking to the customers, they see some of that coming back, maybe not as early, but probably into FY25 later in the year. So that's what we're targeting right now. And again, trying to get the new products qualified there so we can answer it with exabytes. We think that over time, on-prem is going to grow because a lot of the cool applications that people were talking about, real AI applications, will need on-prem storage as well for various reasons: snapshotting and checkpointing of the data and just making sure you feed all the AI engines with massive data at the edge. We think there's opportunity there, but it's definitely lagging with what we're seeing in CSPs right now. Thank you. The next question is from Erik Woodring with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Great, guys. Thanks so much for taking my question. Dave, I really hope you provided an update on HAMR timing tonight. Those comments are obviously helpful in understanding the ramp. I guess I want to provide some assurance for the market on timing, and that is just if I were to ask from 1 to 10, 10 being highest conviction, how much conviction do you have that HAMR will qualify for your first major cloud customer in the September quarter and why? Thanks so much. Well, yeah, we're pretty convicted from our comments in the prepared remarks, of course. In short, Erik, we're looking at the data, and we have thousands of drives running in our shop. We have at the customer sites as well. They're running under a variety of workloads, and we're mindful of the fact that we have to prove the long-term performance. We had some supplier issues during the course of this summer when we went to high volume, but we see the fixes, and we see how they're responding in the test beds that we've got. So we're very optimistic about getting through these things. Our industry is really up to its game as the drives have to last for five, six, seven years in the data center. It takes a little time to prove that kind of performance. We can't just fix that in a week. We have to actually prove it ourselves. So the bar is pretty high, but we'll get over the bar really soon, and that's why we're optimistic about it. Super. Thanks so much, Dave. The next question is from Krish Sankar with TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Yeah, hi. Thanks for the question. I had a two-part question, one for Gianluca on gross margins. It looks like September quarter gross margins are probably like 1,500 basis points. Is it a fair characterization? And do you have any update to your long-term gross margin targets since you're already there? And then, Dave, you kind of spoke about exabytes committed for this year. Any view on FY25 or calendar 25 exabytes for you or for the industry? Thank you. Yeah, in terms of gross margin, as I said before, we are going in the right direction. We have improved our gross margin by a lot in the last three or four quarters, so we're pleased with this trend. We see further improvements coming in the current quarter. Then, as we discussed also in the past, we see both revenue and profitability continue to improve through the calendar 2024. We are fairly optimistic, of course. We always need to check supply and demand balance, and we need to have enough volume to bring underutilization charges to zero. Right now, it is in our forecast. We're going in the right direction. No, we are not giving a new range for now, but as Dave said in his script, especially the hard disk part of the business is particularly strong and is already at the top of what we have in the current model range in terms of gross margin. Then, Krish, relative to your question, for me, there is some evidence that the cloud continues to strengthen going into calendar 2025. We don't want to talk about that too much just yet, but I think enterprise on-prem, this is to Asiya's question, will improve in exabyte demand as well in calendar 2025. Our exabytes are fairly committed through calendar 2024, so we have limited supply, and FY25 is starting to fill up. For customers needing more exabyte scale, that's why we're driving the mix via new product introduction so hard that we talked about. Thank you, gentlemen. Very helpful. Thank you. The next question is from Amit Daryanani with Evercore. Please go ahead. Yep. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question out of the queue as well, I guess. I guess just for some pricing, especially on the mass capacity side, it looks like your pricing is up mid-single, just maybe even slightly better than that. Can you just talk about how do you see the pricing trajectory on a year-over-year basis pan out through the end of this calendar year or through fiscal year? Would love to just get a sense on the pricing side. And then, Dave, when you talk about these HAMR volumes happening in mid-2025, so the push-out you've seen, there's always this fear that as people, as investors, as customers wait for HAMR, Western Digital will pick up more incremental share versus Seagate. Can you just talk about what are customers broadly doing as they're waiting for these HAMR qualifications to happen and what gives you comfort that perhaps the market share doesn't go away from you as these qualifications happen over the next few quarters? Thank you. Well, I think we have products all the way from 20-32 TB, and we're going to go to 40 TB, and we're just asking customers exactly what they want to fill their exabyte demand. So I think we have a lot of options, and we're making sure we're as predictable as we possibly can be. So market share is an outcome, and what we've said many, many times is we're going to go build to order. We're going to communicate with the customers exactly what's going on. So I'm not really worried about market share. It's more how do we predictably run our factories, the long lead times on the products, and the supply is fairly tight right now. Making sure we get the customers exactly what they need when they need it is really our priority. That does transition into the pricing discussion, which I'll let Gianluca answer for you here in a second. But what I would say is if you look back six months ago before we started to see some of this demand uptick, we said we're not taking some deals that we thought were deluded, increasingly deluded to our industry. And now, as we see better and better dynamics, tighter supply dynamics, and so on, we've taken the deals, obviously, the back half of this year. And where it goes from here really is dictated by the continued demand. So how big is the demand next year with all these new applications that people are talking about? Yeah, on the pricing, of course, we are coming out from a fairly long down cycle, and we have started to increase our pricing based on the increased demand a few quarters ago. Part of the pricing is already included in our build-to-order that they've already discussed. So there is part of the volume that already includes a certain pricing for the next several quarters. And there is another part that will be discussed during the quarter in terms of upside and in different segments. In some segments, the demand is strong, especially in the cloud. Enterprise OEM is also starting to improve. That is very good for us. Video and image application, I think through the end of the calendar year, we'll show some further improvement. Of course, there is also a part of the business more in the legacy side that is not currently growing. I would say the industry is becoming more healthy. The ecosystem is improving. So the pricing trend is going in the direction that we have discussed also in the last couple of quarters. Of course, it's part of the improvement that we can see in the gross margin. Perfect. Thank you very much. The next question is from Aaron Rakers with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Yeah, thanks for taking the question. Kind of digging a little bit into the gross margin drivers, one of your competitors talks a lot about SMR, and I know in your slide deck you highlighted the 28TB SMRs going through qualification. I'm just curious of how much of your nearline business today is on SMR, and if not a lot, how much does that ramp change the trajectory of gross margin? Just trying to isolate that SMR benefit that I think could play out from gross margin. And then I guess Gianluca on gross margin, I'm curious of excluding the underutilization charges, it to me looks like you're guiding gross margin more or less flat sequentially. Is there any drivers of why you wouldn't see the same kind of incremental margin flow-through in the model this quarter relative to what you've seen over the last two quarters or so? Yeah, I would say the June quarter came out better than what we were expecting. So we have anticipated a little bit of that gross margin improvement in the June quarter. Again, we are very positive for the current quarter. We have included in the guidance what we already have agreed with customers, and then we will see how the quarter will come out. It can come out also a little bit better than what we expect in terms of pricing, but of course, depends from what are the negotiations through the quarters. We are happy on the cost side. Cost is declining, so this is helping us, and it will be another step during the second part of the calendar year. So in terms of SMR, I don't know if Dave, you want to answer that question. Yeah, hi Erik. So on SMR, I would just say, look, we've qualified SMR at all customers that want it. And SMR is a percentage of the total. It's really a function of what customers are pulling in a given quarter. And so we work with the customers if they happen to want it; there's different flavors of SMR. There's some people who need variants of CMR, and there's a lot of different complexity in the customer base. We'll supply whatever the customer needs. Relative to margins, SMR—does it help margins or hurt margins? It's not very relevant. It helps capacity points in some cases, and that's important for individual customers. But we have options to go wherever we want to on the different flavors of SMR if we have to. Yep. Thank you. The next question is from Timothy Arcuri with UBS. Please go ahead. Hi, thanks. I think in the past, you said that your max exabyte shipment capacity is about 120 exabytes. You just shipped 114. You're going to ship more in September. So in the not-too-distant future, you're going to kind of bump up against max capacity. I know, Dave, you said that you're hiring folks back and stuff, but we're going to kind of get to a point where you've been raising prices. But how do you think about strategically? Do you sort of slow roll the capacity expansion so that you don't really grow that number very much and you instead take price, or do you just think about more of a modest price increase trajectory and you basically backsolve into what you have to expand in terms of capacity? How do you think about that balance? Yeah, thanks for the question, Tim. So we're going to be very cautious given what we've just been through. So it's not ancient history, and I guess the scars are fairly fresh on our back, not only us, but our entire industry, right? So the entire supply chain needs to recover. I think as we start to look out further and people are booking with more confidence things further along, we'll probably add back some people, use some of the existing capacity that we have, top out at that 125 number, or maybe slightly higher than that, which will work as tough as we can inside of operations to do that. We can grow more exabytes by getting through product transitions. And that's one of the reasons why we're trying so hard to get through the product transition. So we don't have to necessarily answer it with new CapEx. We have the CapEx that can actually go through the product transitions already. That's the way we're going to answer it first. Then we'll see how much demand continues above that. Historically, as you all know, demand has been significantly higher for HDDs before the pandemic, and even sometimes during the pandemic. We've been through a wild ride from a supply chain perspective, and if the demand, especially with some of these new applications that are coming online, continues to go north, we'll have to deal with that at the time. I think it's too early to do that yet. So is there some number that the customer is bearing to, I mean, willing to bear, Dave? Is it like do you think the customer can bear these sort of 5%-10% price increases? I mean, those are the kind of numbers we're hearing for the back half of the year. It seems very high and not a number that the customer probably can bear. Well, the way I would think about it instead is as we go to higher and higher capacity points, that value proposition into their data center, if they're going to be running those drives for 5-7 years, is huge, right? They get more power efficiency and everything else. And so, yeah, they see that TCO benefit as well driving through the product transition. Yeah. Tim, finally, supply-demand dynamics will determine the price. That's a reality at the end. So demand is fairly strong, at least in a part of the business right now, and hopefully this will continue for a certain number of quarters in the future. Okay. Thank you. The next question is from Karl Ackerman with BNP Paribas. Please go ahead. Yes, thank you. I'd like to follow up as well on Exabyte capacity. I just was hoping you could think about or help us think about, rather, the outlook for mass capacity demand from here. You indicated that Nearline enterprise and OEM should gradually improve with stronger growth projected in the second half of calendar 2025. However, with HAMR expected to ramp in mid-calendar 2025, are you anticipating or should we anticipate any moderation in cloud demand from now until then, given the fact that September quarter will be the fifth quarter of growth of exabytes, which is a bit longer than what a typical cycle is? Thank you. Yeah. Karl, as you know, the front end of the plunge was much more significant than anything we'd ever seen before. We didn't ever even see negative growth before the middle of this pandemic, right, on nearline exabyte demand. So we started from a very weak spot. I don't think we're back to normal demand by any stretch of the imagination, but we're going to have to, like I said, because of what we've been through, we're going to be very cautious. And did you want to say something else, Gianluca? I would say, of course, no. We have HAMR that is in qualification right now, and in the script, we said we will have a few other customers that will qualify in the next few quarters, and then we will ramp more volume. But we have, of course, many other products that we can use to answer the increase in demand between now and when we have a significant ramp in HAMR. Right, Karl. I mean, the BTO process gives us the visibility that we need. I don't think I would take away that the middle of next year or anything else. I mean, we're going to be very aggressive on all of the products moving forward to give exabytes that way. The high-volume issues, the process issues that we've seen are really valuable learning for us, and I'm happy that the industry is all aligned at 4 terabytes and 5 terabyte value propositions that are not too far away. So we're going to aggressively drive these introductions and be as aggressive as you can just to help reconstitute the margin in the industry. We've had a busy summer making it work, of course, but I wouldn't trade all those learnings in as far as future ramps and future qualifications. Let's go. The next question is from Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi. Just a quick question on when you look at your underutilization. Just want to begin with a question on what the utilization levels are now and how does it get to like 85%, 90% by the end of the year? I'm not sure I got the question, but if you're talking about the level of underutilization, it's not going to be any significant impact for the fiscal year 2025. So that will help our cost per terabyte, our cost in general, and is one factor on the increase of the gross margin that we expect. Right. If it helps, the utilization generally is high, but there are various factories in the industry and the supply chain that have been pulled offline. So the question is, do we bring those factories back online? Even though the utilization of the existing factories might be high, then bringing new factory or, sorry, some of the old factories back online is one of the questions we're dealing with. The next question is from C.J. Muse with Cantor Fitzgerald. Please go ahead. Yeah. Thank you for taking the question. You talked about nearline exabyte committed for all of calendar 2024. Curious how much of that have you locked in fixed pricing. And then I guess bigger picture question on gross margins. Now that underutilization is de minimis pushing into the second half of the calendar year, how should we be thinking about ASPs versus mix driving gross margins higher? And as part of that, as HAMR revenues start to trickle in in September and December at those lower volumes, do you expect that to be accretive or dilutive? And very helpful. Thanks. Hi, C.J. On the bookings, if you will, some of that stuff was booked, as I mentioned before, as much as a quarter ago as we started to see the demand go up. So we're fairly confident in the price and the volume that we can actually supply towards the back half of the year. Yeah. So I would say all what you said will be an add to our gross margin. Of course, the pricing in the BTO, the eventual pricing that we will negotiate through the rest of the quarter and the fiscal year, assuming demand is still growing as we expect. And of course, also HAMR. HAMR, hopefully, we will be able to ship a significant volume in the next few quarters, and that will help also our gross margin to grow. C.J., you also asked a question about whether it's accretive or dilutive to gross margins. That's not exactly the way we think about it. HAMR unlocks new capacity points, of course, very quickly, and so we will drive for that. It's a better TCO proposition, as I talked about before. There's not significant cost issues with the HAMR platforms. So I think what we can do over time is drive for more product efficiency, especially as we get higher and higher capacity drives. The lower capacity drives become much more component efficient, and that's exactly why we're driving the transition. The next question is from Mehdi Hosseini with SIG. Please go ahead. Yes. Thanks for taking my question, and I appreciate all the details. Dave, just want to go back to the long-term strategy. You guys have done a great job of resizing the company and adjusting to a tough market environment and now benefiting from pricing and very diligent with CapEx and everything else. HAMR is ramping middle of next year. When you think about the longer term, especially as we go through this upcycle, what are your thoughts about recapitalizing the balance sheet? What are your thoughts about longer-term earning power for the company? And is there anything that you see in the next year or so that you can do to better strengthen the balance sheet so that we could think of the longer-term growth drivers and earning power in an environment where you're not spending $80 million a quarter in interest expense? Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Mehdi. So these are questions that we're stewing on now since the last year has been so operationally focused to your earlier point, and thanks for all the accolades. I mean, it's a very, very tough year that we've been through, but we're going to have to start addressing these questions. A lot of it comes down to what ultimately the demand is, and is it demand persistent? What we don't want to do is drive our supply back up to some higher demand thing and then go through the same kind of cycle again. We just can't. We can't do that. I mean, on our financial footing. So we're going to have to address the debt. Depending on what the demand ultimately is, we're going to have to address the debt where it is. But if the demand is even higher, then we'll address that when it comes. And I think it's too early to speculate on what that is. We're still recovering from what we've just been through. Yeah. In terms of the balance sheet, we've already partially addressed the high level of debt. We entered into the down cycle with $6.2 billion of debt. We are now at $5.7 billion. Our liquidity is much better than what it was a few quarters ago. We were fairly open in the discussion, even in the prior quarters. We want to bring this debt down, possibly around the $5 billion. And then we see, based on where the business is, if we want to do even more or we stay at that level. The next question is from Steven Fox with Fox Advisors. Please go ahead. Hi. Good afternoon. I hope you don't mind if I go back over the capacity question again. I guess I understand what you're talking about as you go through these product transitions. You sort of are shipping more exabytes per head and platter, etc. But I guess, given this new technology, how do we think about this transition in terms of opening up capacity over the next 12 months versus prior no transitions? Anything you can do on that to help us in modeling out 3, 4 quarters? Because I think we're all struggling with the idea, do we assume that you're in an incredibly tight environment in 3 or 4 quarters where you're getting more price, or do we assume that you're matching demand and pricing is steady? It sounds like you're adding people back already, so I'm just trying to put all that together in some kind of quantifiable manner. Thanks. Thanks, Steve. It is difficult math because you have to understand exactly what the mix is of the demand that comes, right? So if it's all highest capacity drives, that's one question. If you get a lot of mid-range capacity, which is really the strength that we saw before the pandemic, was mid-range capacity. And if some of that starts coming back, there's various customers that may need that. We answer the call differently for a product today, or once we drive through these transitions, we're much more efficient, right? So a lot of it will depend upon the exact mix. I think where we are right now is our thinking is do not add any drive capacity at all. Just continue to be as utilized as we can and wait and see how that mix develops. The next question is from Ananda Baruah with Loop Capital. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Dave, just going back to GenAI, the paperwork you talked about, starting to see demand driven by GenAI, I guess, in what spirit is it starting to show up? Is it just kind of like dribs and drabs? Are you starting to see legitimate kind of chunky orders? And then do you have any visibility or any view on when on-premise starts for inferencing? And I guess just in that context also, are the tier twos yet kind of "legitimate customers" for you guys? Appreciate it. That's it for me. Tier two CSPs. That's a pretty rich question. Let me try this, Ananda. So I think, remember, a few years ago, we talked about the cloud being in the early innings. I think most of what we're seeing as far as demand right now is traditional cloud workloads continuing to migrate to the cloud. So it's maybe middle innings, maybe still early innings for that matter. As far as GenAI, I think we're in the very early innings. So we can all see the efficiency of some of these new applications that are coming, but I have yet to see the big data applications really taking off. And I think they will come with video creation, video storage, video consumption at the edge, exactly to your point. More importantly, I think a lot of AI applications will need snapshotting in order to trust them. I mean, if you make a decision with an AI engine, you're going to need to be able to prove that that decision was the right decision by having snapshots of the data. And I think that's the biggest opportunity that we see at the edge and in the cloud. And so we're quite excited about it, but it's still very early. We do have some purchase orders that are specifically targeted at AI, but we have not really seen how fast some of these are going to grow. And especially for the big data applications that we're really excited about, they're still in the very early innings. The next question is from Tristan Gerra with Baird. Please go ahead. Hi. Good afternoon. The focus on the HAMR has been on CSP customers, but I think you said you're now qualified with some Chinese cloud customers. How incremental is that, and how does it help moving to potentially the US hyperscaler market over time? Sorry, Tristan. Yes. We said non-cloud customers. We didn't say anything specifically about. We didn't know or we didn't even say Chinese. Yeah. I think the way I think about this is there's different kinds of customers that have different kinds of qualifications. And also, those customer architectures are more and less tolerant of certain kinds of faults and things like that. And we're very communicative with customers on this. So the volume ramp has begun. It's not as aggressive as we were six months ago because of some of these volume issues that we have. But we're going to continue to ship more and more units to other people. And learn from those shipments as well as we build volume in our factories, we'll learn about some of these supplier interactions that really slowed us down. The next question is from Thomas O’Malley with Barclays. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Sorry if I missed this. I was bouncing between calls. Could you just update us on the process with the firmware update that you chose to do? I think you had previously mentioned that you had a subcomponent with a single supplier that was causing an issue, but then you used that opportunity to update the firmware. Have you completed the firmware, I guess, requalification? Does that have anything to do with the push out into Q3? What incremental steps do you need to take to complete the qualification from this point? That'd be super helpful. Thank you. No, I think the test beds are up and running. We have high confidence in the firmware qualification, and we think we're over that. We're always doing firmware updates for new features for various customers, various market segments, and so on. I mean, we talked about this in the SMR details earlier. There's always architectural changes going on. So I think we're fairly confident about that. The next question is from Mark Miller with the Benchmark Company. Please go ahead. Just wondering what your thoughts are about in terms of the ramp of introduction of AI chips into PCs. Where do you see that, say, in the middle of next year as% of PCs with AI chips? This is a very interesting topic as well, Mark. From my perspective, it's time for the PC ecosystem to get some new applications. And so I'm very excited about it. I hope that some of those applications are what I'll call video editing applications. And so then the question is, where is the data? Is it on the PC forever? Is it right next to the PC? Is it in the closet in the small medium business? Is it up in the cloud? I mean, as long as those applications are creating data and you want to store that data for a long time, I'm happy with it. Some of the sharing may not be as rich, but I think people are going to be very creative with some of the applications that are coming. We've seen the applications in the AI PC space, but I think the adoption is still going to be slow, and I hope I'm wrong. I mean, I hope it's a little bit faster. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks. Thanks, Gary, and everyone on the call. We appreciate your participation and your questions today. Hopefully, you've seen our enthusiasm for how Seagate is positioned to address the improving demand environment across all of our end markets. By continuing to focus on the fundamentals, the strong financial and operational execution, and advancing our areal density growth roadmap, Seagate's well-positioned to deliver value both to our customers and our shareholders. We look forward to keeping you posted on our progress. The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.