Greetings. Welcome to Sunlight Financial's First Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Lucia Dempsey, Head of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin. Good afternoon, welcome to Sunlight Financial's First Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. After the close of the market today, we filed our first quarter 2023 Form 10-Q, announced first quarter 2023 financial results, and posted an earnings presentation to our investor relations website at ir.sunlightfinancial.com. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that this webcast may contain certain statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include remarks about future expectations, beliefs, estimates, plans, and prospects. Such statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, Sunlight Financial's expectation or prediction of financial and business performance and conditions, and competitive and industry outlooks. Forward-looking statements speak as of the date they are made, are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Sunlight Financial is under no obligation and expressly disclaims any obligation to update, alter or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. The company also refers participants on this call to the press release issued by the company and filed today with the SEC, the supplemental presentation posted to Sunlight Financial's website and Sunlight Financial's SEC filings for a discussion of the risks that can affect our business. Additionally, during today's call, we will discuss non-GAAP measures, which we believe can be useful in evaluating our performance. The presentation of this additional information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in both our press release and the supplemental presentation. Joining me today are Matt Potere, Sunlight Financial's Chief Executive Officer, and Rodney Yoder, Sunlight's Chief Financial Officer. Matt will start with an operational performance review of the first quarter of 2023. Rodney will then share additional detail on our financial results before Matt closes with an update on our key priorities for our ongoing success. We'll open up the call for questions. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Matt Potere. Thank you, Lucia, and thank you all for joining us. In the first quarter of 2023, Sunlight funded $627 million of solar and home improvement loans, reflecting a 6% increase relative to the first quarter of 2022, or a 12% increase when normalizing for the impact of the solar installer that filed bankruptcy in late 2022. Home improvement volume was particularly strong, with $92 million funded in the first quarter of 2023. That's a 20% increase relative to the same period last year. We also funded loans for nearly 16,000 borrowers in the first quarter, demonstrating the sustained demand for solar and home improvement financing overall. We also saw average loan balances continue to grow relative to the first quarter of 2022, with average solar loans up 6% to $47,000 and average home improvement balances up 13% to $19,000. Additionally, we continue to maintain strong relationships with our network of contractors and add new partners to our Orange origination platform, including 41 new solar installers and 32 new home improvement contractors that became active in the first quarter of this year, increasing our total contractor relationships to 2,070, a 30% increase relative to the first quarter of 2022. As previously disclosed, we believe that the new financing arrangements with Cross River Bank, as well as other actions we've taken, position Sunlight to address many of the key issues faced in 2022 by enhancing our indirect channel execution, bolstering our liquidity, addressing the maturity of our SVB revolving credit facility, ensuring profitable pricing, rightsizing our expense base, and reducing our Contractor Advance program. I also wanted to take this opportunity to provide an update on our credit performance, which demonstrates that we continue to be an industry leader in credit quality. While we don't hold loans on our own balance sheet, we track the performance of loans originated with our Orange platform, that we can ensure high-quality credit performance for our capital providers and indirect channel partners. For example, solar loans that Sunlight originated in 2022 had an average credit loss rate of only 77 basis points after 24 months, relative to 162 basis points for similar loans originated by our peers in 2022. This superior credit performance reinforces our dedication to high-quality assets and supports our value proposition for current and future capital providers, providing them the opportunity to earn an attractive risk-adjusted return, which in turn benefits Sunlight's margins. I'd like to now turn the call over to Rodney Yoder, Sunlight's CFO, to discuss the quarter's financial results. Thanks, Matt. Sunlight generated total revenue of $20.6 million in the first quarter of 2023, relative to $30.1 million in the prior year period. While total funded volume was up 6%, total platform fee loans or solar loans were down 59% and the proportion of direct to indirect channel loans also decreased. These factors led to a $5.7 million decrease in direct channel platform fees and a $4.9 million decrease in indirect channel platform fees, as we only sold a small portion of home improvement indirect channel loans in the first quarter of this year. In the first quarter of 2023, our direct channel platform fee margin was 7.1%, up 180 basis points from 5.3% in the first quarter of 2022, reflecting the impact of pricing actions we've implemented in the last year. Given the April indirect channel loan sale as well as upcoming back book loan sales, we expect negative indirect channel platform fee margins in the near term. However, thanks to pricing actions we've been implementing since mid-2022, we expect recently approved direct and indirect channel loans to be profitable and improve our platform fee margins later this year. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter was a loss of $12.4 million relative to a $7.8 million profit in the first quarter of 2022. Adjusted net income for the first quarter was a loss of $17.2 million, or a loss of $0.11 per diluted share, relative to $4.9 million profit, or $0.03 diluted share in the first quarter of 2022. In addition to decreased platform fees, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income for the first quarter of 2023 were impacted by higher unsold loan balances at CRB, which increased cost of revenue from higher origination fees, partially offset by increased interest income. We did not sell any solar indirect channel loans in the first quarter of 2023, we completed a $296 million sale of solar indirect channel loans on April 28, and the associated deferred payments were added to the new term loan as specified in the Cross River Bank agreements. We originated new indirect channel loans at CRB's balance sheet, we expect to maintain our unsold loan balances within compliance of the recently executed CRB finance agreement through additional loan sales in the coming months. I'll now turn the call back to Matt to highlight the significant progress we've made to address our key challenges from 2022. Thanks, Rodney. As just discussed, we're continuing to reduce the balance of unsold loans at Cross River Bank, including the $296 million of solar indirect channel loans that we sold last month. Losses on the sale of the back book loans are supported by the Cross River Bank financing agreements. We're encouraged by the strong demand we're seeing for our high-quality assets in the indirect channel. With increased funding capacity, lower fees, and an extended facility maturity, we are well-positioned to originate profitable indirect channel loans. We've also been taking action since the middle of last year to ensure profitable pricing, including the elimination of a number of unprofitable products and materially raising the interest rate of new loans that are being originated to ensure that they are profitable in both the direct and indirect channels. As a result, we believe the loans we are approving today are profitable. We've also discussed the actions we've taken to right-size our expense base to adjust for our full-year volume expectations. We believe these will lead to approximately $5 million in annual cost savings. As previously disclosed, we indefinitely suspended our Contractor Advance program in March 2023 to improve the company's risk profile and liquidity position. This enabled us to reduce the total outstanding advances from $86 million as of March 31st, 2022, to $18 million as of March 31st, 2023. I look forward to providing additional updates on our progress over the coming months as we continue to strengthen our operations and focus on delivering long-term value for our stakeholders. With that, I'd like to turn the call back to the operator for Q&A. Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing your star keys. Our first question is from Philip Shen with Roth MKM. Please proceed. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. First one is on the remaining amount of platform fee loans that you have on balance sheet. My guess is you guys have about $450 million left after the April sale of about $300 million. Can you talk through how much more could be sold in Q2 and then also in Q3? Do you expect that to taper to close to zero by the end of the year? Or do you expect to keep some kinda residual amount there? Thanks. Thanks, Phil. Appreciate the question. To your point, we did disclose as of March, the unsold loans at CRB were $764 million. In April, as we did complete that $296 million sale, reducing the balance at CRB, you know, the balance, at the end of the second quarter will reflect that sale and other potential sales that'll be completed, partially offset by, you know, further funding in that channel. You'll see on page 10, you know, we've kind of given more detail and a walk of that balance over time. While we haven't disclosed the specific, you know, size of the back book, you know, to your point, we have sold over $500 million in the last five months. you know, we believe the back book is pretty well contained, and we believe the arrangement with CRB provides us for the ability to execute on future sales. We do have, you know, very strong demand for these assets. We're very pleased with the pricing actions we've taken, and the subsequent profitability of the front book going forward. Okay. Thank you. You talked about the margin for the platform fee improving. Can you quantify it any way, how you see that improving over which quarters? Do you think by the end of year this year we could see a normalized level, or do you think it takes a little bit longer than that? Yeah. Phil, thanks for the question. We started taking pricing actions in the middle of last year, and we started to eliminate low coupon unprofitable products in the middle of last year as well. We've continued to take actions to improve the profitability. You know, as Rodney mentioned, we think we have the back book well contained, and we'll continue to sell off those loans. We think the front book is profitable. As the year goes on, you'll see the mix shift away from the back book and toward the front book. We do think, loans that we've been originating recently, because of the pricing actions we took, we do believe that they're profitable. Okay. All right. Thanks, Matt. I might ask one. You guys, this next one might be a little bit the right way of putting it. I'm just gonna ask it, you know. I don't mean this to be offensive in any way. You said in your script, you know, we believed the indirect channel loans that you're originating, you guys think they're profitable now. I'm guessing the loans that are not profitable now in the back book, when you originated them, you also probably thought they were profitable then. Or perhaps that's not true. If it were the case that you thought they were profitable then, but then they turned out to be not profitable, you know, the fact that you're saying that they're profitable today, what can you give the street confidence around in terms of how it might be different this time? Does that make sense? Thanks. Yeah. Understood. Yeah, certainly understand your question. Now, for the last year, interest rates have increased it, increased at, you know, nearly unprecedented levels. We've seen a very rapid rise in rates, and that's what made that back book unprofitable. That said, we made significant pricing actions. We've eliminated unprofitable products. We're having, you know, regular conversations with loan buyers that give us confidence that the loans that we're originating today, we believe are profitable. Got it. Then on a go-forward basis, you know, once you kinda clean up the back book, what do you expect the duration to be for the loans to be originated and kinda sitting there on your balance sheet as opposed to sold off to third parties? You know, would you expect a quarter longer? Would you expect it within the quarter? Thanks. Yeah. Thanks for the question, Phil. You know, we as we sell down the back book, you know, we are seeing similar, in some potential, you know, improvements in loans pulling through and getting to PTO. We don't expect any material change in timeframe, but we do expect it be on a regular cadence going forward. Okay. Great. One last question, I'll pass it on. Can you give an update on your strategic alternatives process? There were some headlines in Bloomberg earlier, getting bought, or, you know, management may be urging the board to then take some action. Just curious if you could share some detail on that topic. Thanks. Yeah, sure. Of course. You know, while I can't comment on any specific rumor or potential transaction, what I can say is, first, we were very pleased to close the agreement with Cross River Bank. We think it positions the company very well to address the challenges from last year. That agreement aligned to the objectives of the strategic alternatives process. All of that said, the board continues to consider additional actions that are in the best interest of the company and the best interest of the shareholders, as we go forward. Okay. Thank you both. I'll pass it on. Our next question is from Arren Cyganovich with Citi. Please proceed. Thanks. I was looking through your 10-K that you put out recently, and one of the items listed said that you only had one direct channel capital provider, at least at that time. But you did fund $240 million loans in the first quarter. Was that all with one single provider? What's your capacity to originate and fund direct channel loans on a go-forward basis? Yeah. Thanks for the question, Arren. You know, really appreciate the, you know, the question. As we've talked about in the past, you know, our depository partners continue to tell us that they appreciate the strong credit quality of the loans. Or the macroeconomic impact. Our call is the entire loan to deposit ratios. As previously mentioned, you know, we expect to have a higher reliance on the indirect channel. You know, Matt talked about the progress we've made, eliminating low coupon products and increasing our loans to generate attractive yields regardless of that channel. We believe, you know, the direct channel provides, you know, benefits. Over time, you know, as those balance sheets free up, they'll come back. At the same time, you know, we're, you know, asset credit performance. We like, you know, what we're seeing from a profitability perspective on a go-forward basis on the front book. I guess from, like, a forward perspective, though, is $240 million, is that possible in the second and third quarters, or do you expect that that's gonna come down to a much lower level? Yeah. Thanks, thanks, Aaron. You know, we're not providing guidance specifically. What I would say is that, you know, given the pricing changes that we made, you know, and the capability, you know, we signed this arrangement with CRB. We really like that arrangement, and it does provide us the flexibility to sell down, you know, our back book and originate, you know, profitable growth, you know, on the front book. That's, you know, that's where, you know, I would look. You know, certainly, you know, we'll have a much higher reliance on the indirect channel, you know, certainly in the near term. Okay. I guess with respect to the Cross River's arrangement, I guess on page 17 of your slide deck, you have the loan caps with various dates. Is that going to be, you know, kind of where the maximum is in terms of originations, on a quarterly basis as you try to sell down the back book? If your cap's at, say, $400 million at the end of this year, is that essentially kind of a limitation for how much you can produce on a quarterly basis? Yeah. Thanks again for the question. A couple things. We'll definitely will stay in compliance with these balance limits. Keep in mind, that is the balance, you know, after both originations and sales. As I mentioned earlier, we're putting on a cadence where as we originate, we'll be selling loans, you know, through that channel. I'd also note that the $400, you know, can be increased with a small, you know, collateral amount of 5%. I would expect us to be somewhere between that $400-$500 capacity perspective. Again, that would be the balance, you know, that would reflect both new originations as well as sales within the quarter. Got it. Do you have a hedging program in place yet for new or indirect channel originations? You know, you know, as we've talked about last year, you know, rates moved, you know, at an unprecedented speed and magnitude. You know, we've made significant improvement in our pricing, which does provide, you know, some protection against interest rates. You know, we'll continue to assess the hedging benefits and associated cost, and we'll evaluate opportunities to mitigate that risk, you know, going forward. Just lastly, you had mentioned some cost savings that you've implemented. What do you view as your kind of run rate, operating costs now on a go-forward basis after your cost savings? Yeah. Great, great question. We have taken steps, you know, as we've talked about before, to, you know, reduce our head count. You know, we've taken actions to address the cost base to align it with the, you know, align the size of the organization with our expected volumes, and we expect about $5 million of annual savings there. With that, you know, we've addressed our advanced program, you know, there. We've taken pricing actions and with the CRB arrangement, we've had, you know, enabled liquidity features for profitable loans. Okay. Thank you. As a reminder to star one on your telephone keypad if you would like to ask a question. Our next question is from Jeff Osborne with TD Cowen. Please proceed. Great. Good evening. Just a couple questions on my side. Maybe just picking up on the expense items. I think a couple quarters ago you had talked about the public company costs of the company being roughly $4 million a quarter. Is that still a good number to use? Yeah, that's. You know, we have, continued to, you know, look for ways of reducing reliance, you know, on third parties. The accounting compliance, you know, numbers, you know, are driving, you know, quite a bit of that public company expense. I think for now, that's probably an okay number to use. Got it. Is there a way to think about what the indirect platform fee would be, you know, on a pro forma basis? Is that with a four-handle, five-handle? I'm just trying to think as that becomes the majority of the mix, how we should think about the profitability of the loans that you're underwriting today. Yeah. That's gonna be, you know, that's gonna be a function of, you know, the timing of sales and the mix of the back-front book. We're not disclosing and providing guidance. You know, you can look at the December sale that we had of $328 million. We took a loss of $22.3 million. You know, that said, you know, we sold loans in April, and we'll report the impact that had on our income statement, you know, when we release 2Q earnings. As Matt mentioned, you know, we've made significant pricing actions. As that front book pulls through, we do expect to see, you know, strong profitability in that channel. I guess I was just trying to get at the front book, excluding any sales of the back book that you're underwater on. Is there a way to think about what the benchmark target is that management's pursuing for new underwritten loans? Yeah. I think, you know, again, while we're not providing any guidance in particular, you know, we have targeted pricing actions that address, you know, the fact that we will be largely relying on the indirect channel to deliver, you know, the profitable loans that you would normally see from Sunlight. Got it. Then I was just curious maybe for Matt, what the uptake of the no-dealer-fee loans are. I think you've got a, what, 9.5% loan out there with zero dealer fee. Is that something that you're seeing demand for or no? You know, we do have a number of products in both solar and home improvement, that do have a no deal, no-dealer fee associated with them. We do certainly see some interest from our contractors. I would say generally, we still see originations skew towards some lower APR products or lower than the no-dealer fee product. We've taken pretty significant actions, as Rodney mentioned earlier, to eliminate those, the lowest APR products. Got it. Last one I had is just on the $18 million of advances. It's great to see that come down. I think in the Q you disclosed that $6 million of it is delinquent by 90 days or more. Is that all with one customer? You also in a separate table break out the concentration. It looks like there's three or four that are chunkier in size relative to the rest. Is the $6 million in particular that's 90 days delinquent, is that, you know, a handful of folks, or is that one or two installers? Yeah, that's gonna be, you know, a combination, you know, of, you know, installers. We can certainly provide, you know, more detail, you know, if, if required. Okay. Thank you. We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Matt for closing comments. Great. Thank you for all your questions, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. We're really pleased with the progress that we've made to address the key challenges from 2022. We're looking forward to generating long-term value for our partners in what we think is a very attractive industry. Thank you all, and have a good evening. Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation.