Okay. And welcome to the Skyworks Investor Update conference call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, this call may be recorded. I will now turn the call over to Rajiv Gill, Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Strategy. Please go ahead. Thank you, Operator. Good morning, everyone. With us today are Phil Brace, Chief Executive Officer and President of Skyworks, and Bob Bruggeworth, Chief Executive Officer and President of Qorvo. This call is being broadcast live over the web and can be accessed from the Investor Relations section of Skyworks' website at skyworksinc.com and Qorvo's website at ir.qorvo.com. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that during the course of this conference call, management of Skyworks and Qorvo may discuss forward-looking statements reflecting their views with respect to the proposed transaction between Skyworks and Qorvo. Please note that today's discussion will include forward-looking statements and, as such, are subject to risk and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include those risk factors discussed in the most recent reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K filed by each company, as well as those discussed in the joint press release announcing the proposed transaction. These and other risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ from those contained in our forward-looking statements. Please review the disclaimers in today's press release, an investor presentation, and in the SEC filings, including the Form 8-K and Form 425 furnished today. Both companies have also posted a detailed investor presentation to their respective investor relations website. I encourage you to download the slide deck and follow along during today's call for additional context on the transaction. In a separate press release issued today, Skyworks announced preliminary financial results for its fourth quarter and full fiscal 2025, available on Skyworks' IR website. Also, in a separate press release issued today, Qorvo announced preliminary financial results for its fiscal 2026 second quarter, available on Qorvo's IR website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Phil Brace. Thank you, Rajiv. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today with special and short notice. Today, we announced a transformative milestone for our industry in both Skyworks and Qorvo. I'm glad to be joined by Bob to discuss this exciting transaction. It's great to be here with you, Phil. As Phil just noted, today marks a remarkable moment for both our companies and our customers. Phil and I will take you through the benefits of the combination on this call, and we'll both be available for questions at the end. Thanks, Bob. Skyworks and Qorvo are combining to create a U.S.-based global leader in high-performance radio frequency analog and mixed-signal semiconductors, with a combined enterprise value of approximately $22 billion. The transaction will bring together two of the most respected names in RF, combining complementary product and technology portfolios, enhancing R&D scale, and expanding customer reach. At closing, Skyworks and Qorvo shareholders will own approximately 63% and 37% of the combined company, respectively. Qorvo shareholders will receive 0.96 shares of Skyworks Common Stock for each share of Qorvo Common Stock, plus $32.50 per share in cash. The boards of both companies have unanimously approved the transaction. Before we get into the details, I want to take a moment to highlight the key takeaways from this compelling combination. Together, we will have enhanced scale with revenue of $7.7 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $2.1 billion, a $5.1 billion mobile business positioned to innovate to address rising RF complexity across a broad range of complementary technologies, a $2.6 billion diversified Broad Markets platform with a growing and profitable TAM, an advanced domestic manufacturing position, and improved factory utilization. Additionally, this transaction will be immediately and meaningfully accretive to non-GAAP EPS post-close, with $500 million or more of advanced annual cost synergies within 24- 36 months post-close. Now, let me walk you through some of the key points in further details. Scale. With revenue of approximately $7.7 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $2.1 billion, the combined company will have broader R&D resources and a stronger manufacturing platform to compete against larger global players. In addition, we will have a more balanced revenue base across markets, including mobile, defense, and aerospace, Edge IoT, AI data center, and automotive. The combination strengthens our customer set, improves efficiency, and enhances predictability through the cycles. Looking ahead, our healthy balance sheet and favorable capital structure will enable us to continue to invest in the business and drive shareholder value over the long term. In mobile, the combination will create a $5.1 billion business with complementary technologies, expanding our reach into areas such as antenna tuning, envelope tracking, and power management. This best-in-class RF portfolio will increase our SAM across platforms, driving greater revenue stability while strengthening our position as RF innovation accelerates into the future. In Broad Markets, the combination diversifies our revenue and customer base and increases our TAM by creating a $2.6 billion business across multiple end markets. In defense and aerospace, Qorvo brings long-standing relationships with Tier 1 defense primes and deep expertise in GaN and GaAs across mission-critical applications, including land, sea, air, and space radar systems, drones, electronic warfare, and satellite communications. In edge IoT, the combination allows us to deliver a complete portfolio of connectivity solutions for broadband infrastructure, industrial automation, and smart energy. In AI data centers, we see compelling opportunities with power management, along with precision timing solutions to enable customers to meet the escalating power and performance demands of accelerated AI workloads. In automotive, we'll have complementary product lines in connectivity, power, and digital radio that can unlock design wins for next-generation vehicles. Broad Markets will be a key platform for the company in the future. Financials. We expect the transaction to be immediately and meaningfully accretive to non-GAAP EPS post-close. We expect to achieve $500 million or more of annual cost synergies within 24-36 months post-close when the companies are fully integrated. The synergy opportunity is both meaningful and actionable. In manufacturing, we can drive fab optimization and higher utilization rates to support healthy gross margins through the peaks and the troughs of the business. In SG&A, we plan to simplify operations and eliminate unnecessary complexity and duplication. Lastly, the combined entity can improve R&D efficiency by focusing resources on strategic growth areas and accelerating new product development. Turning to regulatory approval, we've considered the landscape carefully and have major customer support. We're confident that the transaction enhances customer choice by delivering competitive solutions in applications where complexity is only increasing and the competitive landscape remains intense. We expect the transaction to close early in calendar year 2027, subject to the receipt of required regulatory approvals, approval of both companies' shareholders, and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. In closing, I'd like to acknowledge Bob for his leadership and role in building such an exceptional organization with a rich heritage of innovation. We look forward to Bob's continued guidance and engagement as a member of the board of directors. We're excited for the future together with Qorvo. Thanks, Phil. We are bringing together two organizations with a shared culture of innovation and commitment to technological excellence and industry leadership. Qorvo's technology has been at the heart of systems that connect, protect, and power the planet. We have a proven track record as innovators of new RF and power technologies and have made advancements in design, manufacturing, and communications. This combination creates a pivotal moment for our combined customer base and the shareholders of the future company. The RF semiconductor industry has changed significantly over the past decade, with customer consolidation and growing competition from international competitors. In this environment, scale matters. Through this transaction, our combined company will have the size, scope, and technological breadth needed to compete effectively around the world in mobile and Broad Markets. As one company, our world-class engineering talent will include approximately 8,000 engineers and technical experts and over 12,000 issued and pending patents. With our enhanced scale and combined product and technology portfolios, we can develop advanced system-level solutions even faster, expand customer reach, meet growing customer demand, and make an even bigger impact in both mobile and Broad Markets. Touching more on the mobile and Broad Markets businesses, we're excited for the combined company to build on Qorvo's unique mobile capabilities with expanded R&D scale to invest in next-generation technologies for our customers. We also expect the combined company's Broad Markets platform to benefit greatly from Qorvo's deep experience in defense and aerospace industry, with a significant product portfolio of space, military communications, electronic warfare, radar, and drone solutions. We've also received support for this transaction from Starboard Value, one of our largest shareholders. As we look ahead, we're confident this transaction is the best path forward for our stakeholders, and we're excited for what's in store. Thanks, Bob. We're excited to see all that we can accomplish as a combined company and look forward to sharing more in the future as we move towards closing. Operator, let's open the line for questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, to ask a question at this time, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, you may press star 11 again. As a reminder, given time constraints, please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question coming from the line of Chris Caso with Wolfe Research. Your line is now open. Yes, thank you. Good morning and congratulations on getting the deal done. I guess for the first question, you mentioned that you had support from customers in this deal. Can you elaborate that a little bit to what's been the feedback from customers so far? And obviously, it's probably somewhat limited in terms of what you can talk to them about, but just some more detail on that matter, please. Yeah, thanks for the question. You might imagine that we wouldn't kind of undertake a transaction of this magnitude without having first checked with some of our largest customers. And we might imagine that we've had some discussions in this area in that regard. And we certainly have their support in this area. So I think that's about all I can say on that topic. Got it. Okay. With regard to the synergies, could you go into a little more detail on the $500 million of synergies? Where's that coming from with regard to both OpEx and some manufacturing consolidation that might be achievable through this? Yeah, I think as we mentioned, we've got $500 million or more of annual cost synergies. Within 24-36 months of close, I would say more than half of them are likely OpEx synergies. The other half, or the other little less than half, will be COGS synergies. The timing of that synergy realization is really going to be dependent partly on when we close and then some of the decisions we need to make to kind of maintain customer continuity through that period. So I'd say it's slightly weighted towards OpEx, driven by duplication, really, in SG&A. And then on the COGS side, optimizing our combined manufacturing footprint, increasing utilization, and supply chain efficiencies. We have a high degree of confidence in these synergies and a high degree of confidence in our ability to deliver them. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Krish Sankar with TD Cowen. Your line is now open. Hi, thanks for taking my question. I have two of them. First one, Phil, Bob, kind of curious, what do you think on China's SAMR approval? Do you feel confident it's going to get through, and then I have a follow-up. Yeah, thank you. Yeah, I think, look, I think that we feel we're well advised on this process. We have strong customer support. The product lines are much more complementary than it might exist on this, might believe on the surface. We believe the competitive landscape is intense, and frankly, this combination gives us the scale to invest R&D to compete against much larger global players, so we believe ultimately this will get approved, but we've got a long process to get through all those hurdles. Got it. Bob, did you want to add anything to that? Nothing to add, Phil. You nailed it. I've got a quick follow-up, hello Bob. I mean, the product overlap, this is all makes a ton of sense. I'm just curious, I think in the past you've spoken about the non-Android Skyworks is roughly $20 a phone. You're probably at $8 a phone today. Is there a way to size it for the combined company, what it is, the TAM available, and where you are today? I think, look, the way to size it, I think the way that we're looking at it certainly increases our SAM. If you look at the combined company today, just compared to Skyworks standalone today, we don't do many of the things that Qorvo does in that environment, including envelope tracking, including antenna tuning, including some of the power management solutions, so from our perspective, the combination is incredibly complementary, opens up new SAM, decreases potential volatility with respect to single-socket opportunities, allows us to innovate at the system level, and so this really grows our SAM. We think the RF complexity is going to increase. We think that there's potential for refresh cycle upgrades across the board, and frankly, we've got good customer support on it, so we're excited about the opportunity at our largest customer and certainly at other customers also. Thank you. And our next question coming from the line of Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna. Your line is now open. Hey, guys. Thanks and congrats. I guess first is I feel like the direction of travel was really diversifying outside of handsets, so I guess first of all, are you guys still open, interested, and desiring to do that, and then secondly, would you guys consider additional RF opportunities, consolidation in this space from other names if you think that would pass regulatory muster as well? Yeah, look, I mean, the way that I look at this, this transaction's combination actually brings both scale and diversification. And frankly, I don't look at it as uniquely a handset opportunity. I look at it as a wireless opportunity in that space. I think I've said publicly, the vast majority of devices connected to the internet are connected wirelessly. That will be true for as far as the eye can see. And I think this combination on the RF side brings together two leaders in this space to make us more competitive. Specifically with respect to handsets, I think it opens up our SAM, decreases our volatility, increases our customer stickiness. So I kind of view that as the wireless space. And then in the non-wireless space, really expanding our TAM. We just mentioned one, an aerospace and defense, which is a huge one. And so we've got lots of other growth opportunities that I think could be additive that we haven't even talked about today. In terms of us doing more things in the future, frankly, the capital structure of the combined company is going to be really favorable to allow us to invest both organically, capital returns to shareholders, and frankly, incremental M&A should we see fit from a strategic point of view. So really, I think this is a scale-plus diversification, a very attractive way to structure it financially, synergies the shareholders, and puts us in a position to continue to grow from there. Thank you for that. And yeah, speaking of synergies, just from the manufacturing side of this, I think Qorvo had a bigger manufacturing footprint. And I think there were some utilization and capacity opportunities there filling those fabs. Can you talk about that and maybe what% of synergies might be coming from manufacturing? Well, look, I think both companies independently are working to kind of rationalize some of their capacity and do some things there. You've seen what Skyworks has announced on our own facility. I think that Bob can comment about what they're doing. I think both companies are operating independently. Both companies are going to try and continue to do that. The synergy I talked about there should be incremental to what both companies are doing together. I think long-term, it's probably too premature to really talk about how we're going to do that. A lot of work underway there. I think there was an earlier question whether we get the splits of synergies. More of the synergies have come out of OpEx than manufacturing side, so I think more of them will be we can implement more of them a little bit sooner than the manufacturing side from that side. I don't know, Bob, if you want to comment on your own manufacturing plans from your side. Yeah, thanks, Phil, and thanks for the question. I mean, clearly, we've been moving. We've talked about Costa Rica shutting that down and moving it to our supply base. We also have already moved our GaAs into Oregon to improve the utilization there, and then the last step we're doing in North Carolina is transferring our SAW filter technologies into Richardson, Texas, so we're working on that, but I believe, and just like what Phil said, bring the two companies together, we can certainly improve our manufacturing footprint and reduce our costs and create those synergies. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open. Yeah, hey, guys. Congratulations, Phil, Bob. Bob, you had created Qorvo in a very similar transaction more than a decade ago and created a lot of value for shareholders. I look forward to working with you both on this company, the new entity. So typically, Bob, the question here is typically deals like this, two plus two equals way more than four. When you just look at what you're talking about, $2.1 billion EBITDA plus $500 million, that gets you to about 34% or so implied EBITDA two years out when everything supposedly on paper is worked out. Let's say you and I are talking two years out and everything is working out, you're winning your business, etc. What can the optimized EBITDA profile or operating margin profile of this company look like? Yeah. Thanks for the question. And certainly appreciate the support and look forward to it. And as you noted, semi-industry has really been defined by growing scale and certainly bringing diversification. And that's really what this transaction does. On both of our companies' websites, we put kind of a long-term, at least a target model out there from what this could be. And the Adjusted EBITDA range could get up 35%-40% kind of in the outer range is kind of what we're looking at. Fair enough. And then my second question was competitively, the joint entity you'll have, Skyworks will have everything you need to be the best RF player. You have the high band, you have competency mid, you guys are already pretty strong in low band. Can you talk about the joint entities with the big scale, the ability to win new business and actually grow from where you will be entering this transaction at? Yes, that is exactly right. You nailed it because actually that was the thing for me as Bob and I started talking. I've known him for a long time, and these product lines are way more complementary than one would think about, and I think the combined opportunity gives us the opportunity to innovate across the signal chain, maybe in ways we haven't done before, and I think really when you look at the scale, it allows us to put more R&D in certain areas that can allow us to continue to extend our lead, so I think you're 100% right. I think this should enable us to open up new opportunities for us to continue to grow, not just in handsets, but in wireless overall, as well as some of the other exciting Broad Markets we talked about. And we haven't even talked about what we could do in aerospace and defense, in Wi-Fi, in IoT, in automotive, in all the other segments that this opens up to. I mean, I just go back to billions and billions of devices are connected wirelessly. And that will remain true for as far as the eye can see. So for me, it's incredibly exciting. I think this is not just about us in handsets. This is about wireless, expanding our scale, and diversifying our business. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Tom O'Malley with Barclays. Your line is now open. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the deal. I had two really quick. The first is that you seem pretty confident on customers supporting this and then getting through the regulatory approval process. If the approval process does require some divestiture of businesses, are you open to moving out of China? You both had kind of gone on for the last several quarters winding down the Android businesses. Is that still the intended target, or do you think that you will go back and reinvest in that market given the larger scale? Yeah, look, I think that I don't expect our collective focus on Android in China to change. I do expect the combined company will continue to decline over time. Simply just because of focus, we're kind of focused on the premium side of the market where both companies are playing. And I expect that focus to remain the same. With respect to the regulatory approvals, look, I mean, we feel well advised. As you know, it's a complex dynamic environment. We believe the deal is highly pro-competitive because it enables us to compete against the significantly larger players. And we believe that it brings us increased capacity, increased R&D scale, and a lot of things that I think customers really value. And that's why we have that confidence. Having said that, we're well advised. We've got to go through a lot of steps to go get that done. We'll be taking a methodical and thoughtful approach to getting whatever regulatory clearances we need. I'd like to add to that, if I could, just on the Android. I appreciate the question. Yes, we are both walking away from the lower margin mass tier things. When it comes to the premium and flagship phones, these guys still demand the best that's out there for RF. I really believe bringing these two companies together, we can actually accelerate that, improve the integration. If you look at how complementary a lot of our products are, the Android ecosystem is still going to be important to us. It's just that premium and flagship tier. I think this actually enables us to compete even more against some of the global players that are out there. Super helpful, guys. Just my follow-up. If you look at the slide deck, you look at the long-term model, 50%-55%, both of you kind of in the high 40s today. If you add in the $500 million of synergies, it doesn't fully get you there. So maybe talk about some of the other levers that are getting you to that better gross profit margin longer term. Obviously, you don't want to talk specifically on pricing, but that's obviously the first thing that pops into people's minds. Just maybe any help on how you get to that long-term target. Yeah, look, I think there's, as you might imagine, there's a lot of things that go into that. Factory utilization mix is another big one, right? If you look at in time, we expect a Broad Markets portfolio, which tends to have higher gross margin and higher growth, will continue to be a richer part of the mix as we go forward, so mix, utilization, factory, consolidations, ASPs, all those functions that go into it, and the range is really dependent on a lot of those factors, so that's how that's going to work. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Brett Simpson with Arete Research, your line is now open. Yeah, thanks very much. I had a similar question in the long-term model. I think you guys said for growth, mid- to high-single-digits. And I thought it might be a little bit higher than that for the combined business. But can you talk a bit about synergies and maybe split out long-term growth model for smartphones, what you think you can do in Broad Markets? And I guess just factoring in 6G is not a million miles away. You've got pricing dynamic probably gets better with consolidation in the industry. So a bit more commentary on the mid- to high-single-digits would be much appreciated. Thank you. Yeah, look, I think when we looked at the model, I just want to be clear. We kind of viewed when we look at pricing dynamics and things like that, we viewed that to be stable over the horizon. And obviously, you can make some other comments around whether that changed or not. But our view at this point is that it's stable. When we look at the mid to single digits, the way we look at it is the handset market will be kind of low single digits. That's where our assumptions are there, offset by some of the Android decline and the China decline, increased by refresh rate, complexity increases, and things like that. And then our Broad Markets business, we kind of think low double digits kind of growth rate, right? Think defense aerospace, IoT, automotive, those kinds of things. So we think the combination of the Broad Markets that kind of low double digits and then the handset in the mid single digits or mid to low single digits is kind of where you get that into. And you're right on 6G. Look, I mean, that's part of why I get excited. I mean, I think that long-term, we've got a lot of tailwinds that could come into play on that. But frankly, we should be able to do better should those things exist. But we're not baking those into the model, right? I think that we're taking an approach that we have a disciplined focus way to return value. And frankly, some of the things you talk about, there should be value-enhancing opportunities for us as we close. Okay, that's great. Thanks, Phil, and just to follow up, in terms of in the event the deal doesn't close for whatever reason, is there any penalties we need to be aware of in terms of how this deal gets wound down? Thank you. You might imagine we had a bank of advisors on both sides advising us on all those different things. There's a variety of different closing conditions and a variety of different fees that are associated with that. That will be disclosed in the 8-Ks or in the transaction. You can go check out that in terms of where they are. I would say nothing non-customary. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Peter Peng with JPMorgan, your line is now open. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Congratulations on the deal. From the cost synergies, you mentioned earlier that roughly half of that is OpEx and half of that is COGS. Should we kind of, in terms of linearity of realizing this $500 million, maybe that some of the half of that will be probably realized in the first year and then the remainder in the second year? Would you be maybe talk about how you think about the linearity of the synergies? To be clear, I think more than half of the synergies are likely to come from OpEx, as we said before, so more than half is OpEx, less than half is that. That would suggest that you could have a somewhat front-loaded ramp to the synergies, but what we're talking about now is $500 million or more within two-to-three years, and I think that's at this point. Some of the timing of the synergies, obviously, is going to depend on A, when we actually close, when within the year we close, where we are with certain customer ramps, profiles, and programs, so there's some variability there that we can't really get into at this point, but more than half the synergies are OpEx. That would suggest to result in an earlier ramp of the synergies, the timing of which is really going to depend on when we close and where we are in the customer ramp cycles. Perfect. And then maybe just on areas of potential revenue synergies. And is there any kind of thing that you're baking into that mid-to-high single digits on your longer-term model, areas of where you can see potential revenue synergies? In the long-term model, we talked about we have not yet gone through the opportunity to see where the synergies are. I think that is an area that, frankly, both companies and both teams are excited about. We both have complementary technology, I think, we can bring to both of the markets that we play in. So we have not yet gone through that. But I think that that's an exciting tailwind opportunity for us. I mean, when I look at the value creation opportunities beyond what we can deliver here, think about the ramp in wireless, think about the complexity of RF, think about the new things we can do when we combine these complementary portfolios. I think there's a lot of incremental upside here that we can drive in the long term. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Vijay Rakesh with Mizuho Group, your line is now open. Yeah, hi, guys. Good to see the consolidation here. Just wondering, in terms of the FAB consolidation, what you are expecting. And I saw the $300 million or so breakup fee. Just wondering what you are looking at in terms of the probability on the SAMR approval side as well in their follow-up. Yeah, one of the things that's exciting, and Bob, you can comment if you're on the manufacturing side, specifically on the Qorvo side if I follow things up. But look, one of the things I really got excited about, I mean, both companies have a very strong U.S. manufacturing footprint, and I think this really bolsters our manufacturing presence here in the United States. We've got some strong assembly test capability as well, so I think there's a lot of potential for us to do things not only from an efficiency utilization perspective, but frankly, even bring some potentially new capabilities on the manufacturing side that both companies haven't been able to before, so I'm excited about that. Too premature to really talk about which facilities and how that works out. We've got a detailed plan that we'll be working through. We're confident that we can get those synergies out, and we'll be working through that over the coming weeks and months. In terms of SAMR, what I said previously stands. We're very well advised on this topic. We think the deal is highly competitive. It brings together two complementary products. We've got customer support on it, and we'll just take that through. We'll just take that through the process and be deliberate and methodical about how we do it. Got it. And then in talking about diversification, I know you run it by your customers. But is there a risk that this creates significant concentration from their side as well in terms of the supply chain? And there are some diversification challenges that they have to go through as well? Well, I can't speak for them on that topic. I mean, if you look at some of the other players in this space, we are competing against behemoths. And so I think that part of the attraction from the customer point of view is the ability for us to become a very strong player to help balance some of the other players that exist in the market. Bill, I'd like to add to that if I could. I think when we talk to some of our bigger customers, what they're excited about is our ability to combine some of our engineering to actually produce even better products than we're able to do today. So I feel very confident that there's the support that Phil's already talked about because they see what we can do when we're together. They want to build better products. And we can help them do that. Thank you. Our next question coming from the line of Gary Mobley with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question and congrats on getting this deal done. I haven't had a chance to read through the entirety of the SEC filings, but can you speak to whether or not this was a competitive bidding process? Just wanted to verify that. What I can't say. Yeah, let me get Bob. Yeah, I mean, the board unanimously determined this transaction was in the best interest of our shareholders. They're confident the value that our shareholders represents an appropriate premium. As you can see, what's going on for this transaction of this kind, it reflects the value and exciting future that we believe we're going to have. Okay, thank you for that. In terms of regulatory approvals, in addition to U.S. HSR and China SAMR, what are some of the other regulatory hurdles that you feel you're going to have to cross? Look, I think that regulatory matters, I think that I'll just go back to, we will likely need to kind of focus on several other jurisdictions. We're working through that now with our advisor teams. We believe this is highly complementary, and we're confident where we are there, so I think that's really all I can say about that topic. Thank you, and our next question coming from the line of Cody Acree with The Benchmark Company. Your line is now open. Yeah, guys, thanks for taking my questions. And congrats on the transaction. While I appreciate the revenue synergies and the technology synergies, specifically in your smartphone space, are there areas that you've identified where either you have overlap today that may present some dollar content challenges in maybe next year's model or the year after's model, or areas of your R&D where you have had similar roadmap paths that would need to be redirected? And how quickly might you be able to redirect those efforts? Yeah, this goes back to the synergy comment again. I mean, we expect $500 million or more synergies, more of those will come out of OpEx. We would expect to be able to realize some of those soon or sooner on the front end of the ramp versus the tail end of the ramp. We're talking about 24-36 months. The timing of the implementation of that is related to what you described before and related to the timing of closure, right? I mean, if we close at a certain point in the year, that's going to be a different cycle in the design cycle and the customer ramps and things like that. So what surprised me the most is there's actually much more complementary capabilities than there are overlap capabilities. We talked about antenna tuning, envelope tracking, power management. And if you actually look at our business underneath it there, the amount of overlap in the specific wireless space is much smaller than you might admit. Having said that, or not admit, that we might recognize. Having said that, obviously, there are going to be some areas where we're going to look to prioritize the resources to, frankly, invest more in key areas that our customers are looking for. So I do think there's opportunity there. And we'll be working hard to extract those synergies. Great. And then lastly, just any thoughts on divisional leadership going forward? No, we made no changes or no comments about that going forward. I would expect to make some more announcements about that closer to close. And in reality, both companies need to operate independently. Until then, the close period, we've got quite a few months ahead of us on that. I think both companies need to remain focused on their core business and delighting the customers. And that's what we're going to be working on. Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's question and answer session. I'll now turn the call back over to Mr. Philip Brace for any closing comments. Great. Thank you very much for attending today on such short notice. This is a transformational opportunity and transformational transaction for both Skyworks, Qorvo, and the industry. It's a tremendous opportunity to both bring some scale and diversification. We're excited not only by the synergies, but the growth opportunities that this opportunity provides, and we'll look forward to giving you more information in the coming weeks, months, and quarters. Thanks for all your support. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation.