Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Teledyne Technologies Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all parties are in a listen only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session. Instructions will be given at that time. If you should require assistance during the call, you can press star and then zero. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the call over to our host, Mr. Jason VanWees. Please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. This is Jason VanWees, Vice Chairman of Teledyne, and I'd like to welcome everyone to Teledyne's third quarter 2022 earnings release conference call. We released our earnings earlier this morning before the market opened. Joining me today are Teledyne's Chairman, President and CEO, Robert Mehrabian, Senior Vice President and CFO, Sue Main, SVP, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary, Melanie Cibik, and also Edwin Roks, Executive VP of Teledyne. After remarks by Robert and Sue, we will ask for your questions. Of course, though, before we get started, attorneys have reminded me to tell you that all forward-looking statements made this morning are subject to various assumptions, risks, and caveats, as noted in the earnings release and our periodic SEC filings. Of course, actual results may differ materially. In order to avoid potential selective disclosures, this call is simultaneously being webcast and a replay, both via webcast and dial-in, will be available for approximately one month. Here's Robert. Thank you, Jason. Good morning, and thank you for joining our earnings call. I'm very pleased with our performance this quarter, as well as Teledyne's long history of navigating challenging markets. Despite the strong dollar, supply chain constraints, and inflation, we achieved record third quarter sales, earnings, operating margin, and free cash flow. Excluding foreign currency headwind, which negatively impacted third quarter sales growth by approximately 3% or $39 million, core growth in local currency would have been 6.9%. In addition, year-over-year reported sales increased in all segments despite the FX headwind. Non-GAAP earnings of $4.54 was a third-quarter record and just shy of our all-time record. Our earnings quality was also very high, given our largest effective tax rate in several years. Overall, orders and demand remain strong, which is a testament to the strength of our balanced business portfolio. Total company book-to-bill was 1.06, and while orders remained reasonably healthy in our short cycle commercial businesses, they were particularly strong in our longer cycle government, marine, and aviation businesses. Quarter-end external backlog of approximately $3.2 billion was also a record. Record third quarter free cash flow of $252 million improved for the second consecutive quarter and was 116% of adjusted net income. Our acquisition pipeline is growing and we were pleased to announce the pending acquisition of ETM earlier this morning. Turning to our 2022 full-year outlook. With our strong operating performance in the third quarter, we're able to increase our full-year earnings outlook while de-risking the prior heavily weighted Q4 forecast. On revenue, given our current exchange rate and the U.S. government's continuing resolution, as well as the evolving semiconductor and technology export controls, we're a bit cautious at this time and now project full-year sales of roughly $5.45 billion. In the third quarter, we also took the opportunity to refocus Teledyne core by eliminating some smaller money-losing products to help improve our margins, and as a result, we had some cuts to our revenue. Finally, while supply chain constraints continue to limit shipments, we have seen a modest, very modest improvement in recent weeks, at least with regard to availability of certain printed circuit boards as well as electronic components. I will now further comment on the performance of our four segments. Starting with our Digital Imaging segment, third quarter sales increased 2.2% despite currency translation headwind of really nearly 4%. Sales growth was strongest for industrial and scientific vision sensors and systems, as well as for our low-dose, high-resolution digital X-ray detectors. Sales of commercial infrared imaging cameras and components also increased. GAAP segment operating margin was 17.2%, but adjusted for intangible asset amortization, segment margin was 22.9%, a 170 basis point improvement from the second quarter of this year. In our Instrumentation segment, overall third quarter sales increased 6.7% versus last year. Sales of electronic test and measurement systems, which include oscilloscopes, digitizers, and protocol analyzers, remained strong and increased 9.7% year-over-year, with growth in all major geographies and product categories. Sales of protocol analyzers across numerous industry standards, such as Peripheral Component Interconnect Express or PCI Express, Universal Serial Bus or USB, and High Definition Multimedia Interface, HDMI, remained strong, as well as sales of oscilloscopes and our unique CrossSync product, which combine oscilloscopes and protocol analyzers together. Sales of environmental instruments increased 6.3% compared with last year, with greater sales of both drug discovery and laboratory instruments, as well as air monitoring and process gas analyzers. Sales of marine instrumentation increased 5.1% in the quarter, primarily due to near record sales of autonomous underwater vehicles for both defense and commercial oceanography applications. Overall, Instrumentation segment profit increased 12.9% in the third quarter, with GAAP operating margin increasing 126 basis points to 23.2%, and 83 basis points on a non-GAAP basis excluding intangible asset amortization. The margins increased to 24.5%. In the Aerospace & Defense Electronics segment, third quarter sales increased 4.8%, primarily driven by a 20.7% increase in sales of commercial aerospace products. GAAP segment operating profit increased 23.4% with margin 349 basis points greater than last year. Finally, in our Engineered Systems segment, third quarter revenue increased 7.2%, and operating profit also increased slightly. Before turning the call over to Sue, I wanted to make a couple of concluding remarks. Over the last 18 months, we have endured the same challenges as most companies, that is, record inflation, supply chain constraints, and now strong U.S. dollar. At the same time, we completed the integration of Teledyne FLIR, our largest acquisition, and then we rapidly leveraged. While the operating environment remains challenging, we're glad to be back to doing what we do best, investing in our businesses to drive organic growth, being vigilant on costs, and simplifying our operations to increase margins, and finally, acquiring and integrating complementary businesses. Now I'll turn the call over to Sue. Thank you, Robert, and good morning, everyone. I will first discuss some additional financials for the quarter not covered by Robert, and then I will discuss our fourth quarter and full year 2022 outlook. In the third quarter, cash flow from operating activities was $268.9 million, compared with cash flow of $192.8 million for the same period of 2021. The third quarter of 2022 reflected stronger trade receivable collections compared with the third quarter of 2021. Free cash flow, that is cash from operating activities less capital expenditures, was $252.2 million in the third quarter of 2022, compared with $163.6 million in 2021, which included $2.1 million of after-tax cash payments related to the FLIR transaction. Capital expenditures were $16.7 million in the third quarter of 2022, compared with $29.2 million in 2021. Depreciation and amortization expense was $80.8 million for the third quarter of 2022, compared with $90.2 million. In addition, non-cash inventory step-up expense for the third quarter of 2021 was $35.2 million, with no comparable amount recorded in the third quarter of 2022. We ended the quarter with approximately $3.44 billion of net debt. That is approximately $3.9 billion of debt, less cash of $479.3 million. Stock option compensation expense was $3.7 million in the third quarter of 2022, compared with $5.8 million in 2021. Turning to our outlook. Management currently believes that GAAP earnings per share in the fourth quarter of 2022 will be in the range of $3.67-$3.80 per share, with non-GAAP earnings in the range of $4.46-$4.56. For the full year 2022, our GAAP earnings per share outlook is $15.46-$15.60, and on a Non-GAAP basis, $17.70-$17.80. The 2022 full year estimated tax rate, excluding discrete items, is expected to be 23.1%. I will now pass the call back to Robert. Thank you very much, Sue. We would now like to take your questions. Operator, if you're ready to proceed with the questions and answers, please go ahead. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you do wish to ask a question, please press one and then zero on your telephone keypad. If you could withdraw your question at any time by repeating the one-zero command. If using a speaker phone, please pick up the handset before pressing those numbers. Again, it's one-zero to ask a question. One moment. We'll go first to Greg Konrad with Jefferies. Please go ahead. Good morning. Good morning, Greg. Maybe just to start, Digital Imaging had a nice margin pickup and recovery from kind of H1. Can you maybe talk about the margin dynamics around price mix and how you think about the recovery there, or maybe expectations for the year? Well, let me start with the expectations for the year and then see if I can answer the rest. Actually, if you look at the year, we have net pricing improvement across all of our businesses of about 3.6% of sales, but that includes Digital Imaging. On the other hand, against that, we have inflation, Greg, and price increases in the products that we buy. The price increases in the products that we buy have been about 3.4%. We also have salary increases of about 4%. Our net pricing increases have kinda offset the headwind that we have from price increases to us, that is, inflation. The flip side of that is that we've had to pay a little extra for scarce products, like complex FPGAs and others that we could not build into our price, so that we've had a headwind there. I'm gonna say about 2%, about $50 million. Fundamentally, Digital Imaging has done well. They've improved their margins, but it's been a relatively tight year up to now. Can you maybe comment on just the defense business more broadly? I mean, it seems like you're getting quite a few of, you know, contracts, some at FLIR, some in the broader business. I mean, broader market commentary seems to think that demand outstrips supply right now. I mean, how do you think about the timing of some of these new defense opportunities and kind of the outlook there? I think in general, what we're finding is that in our defense businesses, our book-to-bill has improved significantly. Now, for the third quarter, actually, our government businesses were down slightly. The book-to-bill, which is the important part for us, has improved both in FLIR, it's close to 1, but in our aerospace and defense electronics, it's closer to 1.5, and in Engineered Systems to 1.35. What we're finding is that the demand for electronic components and systems, including parts that are going to Javelin and other weapons that are being depleted, those are coming back strong. We also have really good orders in systems that are being developed like a wide field of view tracking layer, which is for missile tracking, basically. We've had orders, good orders, and we will have programs of about $60 million over two years. That goes across a lot of our products. In general, you're right. We've seen strength in our defense businesses and some moderation in our commercial businesses as time has gone on. Just last one, kind of a clarification question. I mean, you called out the 3% headwind from FX. Just wanna clarify, is that only a translation headwind, or are you seeing any changes to competition just when you're competing with maybe a local currency competitor? No, it's really a headwind from FX. It's a translation only. It started the year at about 1%, went to 2% in Q2, 3% in Q3, and we're estimating about 2% in Q4, for a total, Greg, of a $110 million hit that we're taking to our revenue for the full year. If we didn't have this translation only, we would have revenues, another $110 million in revenues. Thank you. Thank you, Greg. Next we can go to Joe Giordano with Cowen. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Morning. Morning, Joe. Last quarter, very modest cut, I think took some people by surprise. Now a bit of a raise here. We're kind of in the same zone at the end of the day, despite all that. Kind of like, what are the big changes? Did some kind of key risks that you were thinking about last quarter, maybe not materialize to the same extent? 'Cause it was kind of like a lot of movement to get to the same place, I guess, at the end of the day. Yeah. Well, you know, when we started the last quarter, we weren't sure how much of our price increases would stick. Obviously, we were also concerned whether we could manage our margins to take costs out to improve our margins. All of those, coupled with the fact that our commercial orders held up pretty well, in the imaging businesses, helped us along the way. In a way, yes, we weren't in trouble in any way. We're just kind of very cautious because the headwinds were unpredictable. As we took some costs out and increased prices, and we had good cash flow, by the way, it's given us a lot more confidence, so we raised our outlook and de-risked Q4 at the same time. Yeah. No, that's fair. I think when we spoke last quarter, your view for Digital Imaging margins was something like 22%-ish for this quarter and then maybe 23% for next quarter. It looks like you're three months ahead of that, so you're at 23% now. Should we expect Digital Imaging margins to increase further in the fourth quarter? A little bit, yeah. I think overall in the fourth quarter. Well, let me go talk to the year, which is easier for me to do. For the year, we think we will be at 22.2%, which would be about 20 basis points better than last year. I think Q4 is gonna be better, about 22.7%-22.9% of that range. Again, I'm a little cautious here because you know, there's some softness in the commercial market. Again, our defense businesses are picking up. Yep, that makes sense. Just last for me. I mean, I know it's early, and we don't wanna talk about 2023, but I know that there was this bogey out there for a while now about the potential for you guys to do, give or take, around $1 billion of free cash flow in 2023. Is that still, in this world, like, a reasonable target to shoot for? Or is it that kind of not achievable given FX and all these other things we've talked about for the last six months? Let me say, I think $1 billion for 2023 is a little too high, because we have capitalized R&D that we have to worry about. Having said that, if you look at the big picture, which is the way I approach this, we started after the FLIR acquisition with a net debt to EBITDA of 3.7. We're down to about 2.5 now. By the end of the year, everything else going along, we'll be down to 2.4. If all goes well, by the end of next year, and then by the end of 2024, we'll be down to 0.9. That gives us a lot of cash to do acquisitions, and that includes making maybe $500 million of acquisitions in the interim. The way I look at cash flow is longer term view. We probably won't make the full $1 billion. We'll come close, but most importantly, we'll be levered and be able to make acquisitions at the same time and put us in a position where we can do something bigger if we want to later on. Thanks, guys. Next we'll go to Elizabeth Grenfell with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Could you give us a few details around the acquisition that you announced this morning? Yes, be happy to. It's really. While we didn't disclose the terms, it's got about 112 employees. It's in Northern California. What it does is really it gives us two very important components. It adds to our products that we don't have. First, in the microwave area, we make Traveling Wave Tubes, but in order to drive these tubes, you need a power supply. So far, we've had to go to other people to buy the power supplies for our tubes. We've been looking for that, and there's a scarcity of suppliers in that domain. With this acquisition, now we can essentially supply a system of both tubes and power supplies. For example, in a given application we were studying, we sell the tubes, and they add up to about $300,000 for that application. When we put the power supply with the tubes together, we can sell it over $2 million. That's in the defense area. The second area is in our medical field, where we supply products that go into cancer therapy, radiotherapy, X-ray systems to kill cancer. We basically have a product that makes microwave high-energy pulsed microwave that are used in that system. We've added to that. We used to sell that for about $10,000. We've added to that more components, and we've gotten to where we sell about $40,000-$50,000 of products in a system. Again, what we didn't have is the power supply cooling system, the whole system that you can use in developing the high-energy X-rays, and that, again, is something that ETM brings to us. What happens is a cost that used to be $10,000, we have grown it to maybe $40,000, now can grow over $100,000 per radiotherapy system. They have really good customer contacts, and they've been accepted by the customers, as have we with our own products. That's why we're making this acquisition. It's complementary to both our defense as well as our radiotherapy businesses. Okay, great. Thank you. The impact of the portfolio shaping you did within Teledyne FLIR this quarter, how much of an impact did that have on margins? It improved margins slightly, but more importantly, what we're doing is we took the costs out by reducing the workforce. It was a product line, for example, that they bought just before that acquisition in December 2020. You know, we bought them in May 2021. It was a product where they were trying to produce basically commercial industrial commercial UAVs. Unsuccessful. Difficult business to be in. We have in FLIR we have really good products in the defense domain that we sell substantial amounts of. But to compete in the industrial domain, that was a product that we had to kill. Okay. If I could speak one more in, please. How are you thinking about the supply chain headwinds now and when, if you think they'll abate, and then the sales that are being lost because of challenges, are those continuing to shift to the right, or are they starting to disappear? Any way to think about that? Elizabeth, let me answer the second part of the question first. What's happening to us is that we have about a $60 million shortfall in sales that rolls over quarter and over quarter. It's not cumulative. It's not like you have four quarters of $60 million loss in sales that adds to 240. It's just $60 million. What happens, it gets delayed, we get parts. The next quarter, we ship what we couldn't ship, then we get delayed again. We may start a quarter looking, saying, "It's gonna hurt us by a $100 million," but we recover from that. It's a $60 million problem for us right now. The flip side, the first part to your question, we're seeing some improvement, especially in the more simpler printed circuit board assemblies. For example, to sell our cameras from Teledyne DALSA and Teledyne e2v, we need about 1,000 circuit boards a day on occasion. That was drying up for various reasons. We've managed to address that problem, so that's good. We also have some improvement in components. Having said that, we still have really tight market for more complex systems like field-programmable gate arrays, which are FPGAs. There, what's happening is the supply shortages are such that people are allocating certain number to each company. We have a very effective effort underway to combine all of our needs across Teledyne, prioritize them, and give our priority numbers to our suppliers. Having said that is not improving. Some of our suppliers are asking for non-cancelable orders that go out a year from now. You have to make choices there, obviously, and we're also doing that. Part of it is relaxing, the PCBA, but part of it with the field programmable gate arrays, that's not. It's a mixture, but I'd say overall, there's improvement. Great. Thank you very much. For sure. Next, we can go to Jim Ricchiuti with Needham & Company. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning. Hey, Robert Hi. You alluded to the short cycle business holding up reasonably well, and I'm just wondering, as you think about that area of your business in a mild recessionary environment, which areas do you see the business beginning to soften first? And are you seeing any signs of that in your bookings in any of that short cycle business? Yeah. In some of the products that we make. I'll start with Digital Imaging. In some of the products that we make, for example, that go into warehouses, as the demand is softening in that domain, then obviously they don't need as much of our products for automation and improvement of delivery of their products. On the other hand, because we have such a broad portfolio of products that range from security to traffic to firefighting, not all of them are kind of getting impacted simultaneously. That's why we think it's the downward pressure is not as great for us because of the diversity of our products. Now, if you went outside digital imaging, for example, in our instruments domain, where we have environmental instruments, we have oscilloscopes, protocols, we have marine instruments, we have marine vehicles, those things are a lot better. We think it might soften, but it hasn't softened much yet. We are getting in the instruments, our book-to-bill is still 1.05. What happens is that's the thing that Jason and I always talk about, is the breadth of our products and both in terms of who we supply to and what people buy our products for, but also the diversity of our geographic diversity of our products, but that's protecting us. We might have softness in some areas, but overall, I think we're doing okay. Okay. Just on the comment that you made about M&A and certainly you could see the net leverage really coming down fairly meaningfully over the next one to two years. You alluded to 2024 potentially giving you the opportunity to do a big deal. Are you averse to doing a larger deal in 2023, or is it a case of, you know, there are smaller deals that you could do, and you'll just maybe gauge how the macro environment is and whether valuations potentially come down for certain larger assets? Good point. Right now, if you look at the market for public companies, as Jason often says, people always look in the rear-view mirror, right? Everybody's looking at, in the rear-view mirror, including us, and you're seeing 52-week highs, right? In the back. Might be nine months ago. Nevertheless, it's there. Expectations are what you see in your rear-view mirror. If we go forward and things persist the way they are and people see lower numbers looking backwards, then I think we'll have more opportunities. Right now, what our focus is to see if we can do more bolt-ons, as we've done historically. When we acquired e2v in 2017, our ratio, net debt to EBITDA ratio went up almost to 3. What we did, it came down by the end of 22 and a half years later or so, it came down to essentially zero, and we, in the interim, made another $500 million of acquisitions during that period. The number I quoted for 2024 end includes us being able to spend maybe $600 million of smaller acquisitions. As to the bigger acquisitions, I think we ought to wait a little. We obviously have some things in mind, but we ought to wait a little bit before you know, people are not so effervescent about their revaluations. Is your interest mainly in the commercial area, or has anything changed with respect to how the defense environment looks? Right now we still like our commercial businesses, but we're also seeing, as you saw, we also bought something, at least a bolt-on in the defense domain, partially bolt-on in the defense, partially defense in the bolt-on. We will do some bolt-ons in the defense, especially if they fit our portfolio. But on the larger stuff, it would be either commercial or a mixture of the two, like FLIR was. FLIR was, you know, 60% commercial, 40% defense. We will look at that, whether it's 70/30 or 60/40, we look at the combo. Got it. Thanks very much, and congratulations on the quarter. Thank you. Next, we'll go to Andrew Buscaglia with Berenberg. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, guys. Good morning, Andrew. You know, along the lines of the short cycle discussion, specifically, can you comment on FLIR? FLIR's more industrial assets, which can be pretty volatile, and can move pretty quickly, especially to the downside in a downturn. I guess, what are you seeing with, you know, pace of orders or anything, any indication how that's trending in that business? Then generally, how are FLIR margins settling in? I know they've been kind of volatile, you know, during this integration process. Can you update us on how you feel about that? Sure. Let me start with the product. Generally, I would say because of the breadth of this product, while there are some softness in some areas, just like our breadth of our digital imaging, FLIR's book-to-bill right now is close to 1.98, which is in some ways better than also e2v. Because of the, again, because of the breadth of the products that they have, from thermography instruments to infrared detectors, to maritime systems, security, traffic, I don't think we're gonna get hit on all of those, all at once, and we're not. The only problem that we have at FLIR, if I may call it that, is that historically, their revenues have been more skewed to the end of the quarters rather than evenly paced during the quarter like the rest of our Digital Imaging is. The only risk there is you get closer to the end of the quarter and something unforeseen happens, and then it can hurt you. We're working very hard to flatten that out. It'll take us. We had the same problem in every acquisition we've made, large acquisition, whether it was DALSA or e2v or others. We're working very hard to flatten that curve, the shipment curve. Having said that, coming back to margins, I think margins are settling in. From a Non-GAAP perspective, while there's been some volatility, as you appropriately noted, I think we'll settle by the end of the year. We'll settle to about overall in Digital Imaging to 22.2%. FLIR will be a little further down from that, but generally we should be okay. Last year was an odd year because, you know, we bought FLIR in the middle of the second quarter, and we essentially shipped 12 weeks of product with eight weeks of cost, again, because of that end of the quarter shipment that I mentioned. That skewed the numbers. Things have fairly well stabilized now. I think what we're looking for is make sure we get to our 22.2% by the end of the year for all of our Digital Imaging, and then hunker down and improve that next year. Okay. That's helpful. Then you gave some nice color on the ETM deal. I might have missed it, but how big is this company, and maybe any information you can provide on their margin profile, where you expect those to go? All right. I missed. Obviously, we've been hesitant to talk about it, but it's gonna be probably in our Q anyways. In a few days, maybe later on. It's got about 112 people. The reason I'm a little hesitant about the sales, which are about $50 million, is that they also buy products from us. So they buy our Traveling Wave Tubes, including with their power supplies, and they sell them. So the deal's gonna be accretive. How many cents depends on how you look at the cost of borrowing. Could be accretive $0.02, $0.03, $0.04 if we say the cost of borrowing is 4% or 5%. On the other hand, you know, our cost of borrowing is not 4% or 5% because our average cost of borrowing, with our fixed borrowing and cash is more like 2%. It's gonna be accretive revenue, a little shy around $50, with some pass-through of our own products. I don't know if that's helpful. Okay. Yeah, very, very helpful. Just trying to get an idea of the size. Okay, thank you, guys. Thanks, Robert. For sure. For sure. Next, we'll go to Kristine Liwag with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, everyone. Good morning. Robert, on the supply chain, it really sounds like it's starting to ease for you, and your mitigating actions have been paying off. Can you provide a quantitative update? Last quarter, you had mentioned that 800 of the 900 missing components were resolved. Where are we at this quarter and, how does that trend from here? It's getting better. You're correct, but we started the year, this year, Kristine, by having about 36% of our missing components. Of course, the components were lower number when we started the year. They were more like 500 components, and we're at 35% that we couldn't get at that time. We're now over 1,000 components, 1,100 components, but the missing percentage has gone down to about 6%-7%. You're absolutely right. There's the improvement. The flip side is that of the 1,100 components, where we're missing maybe 65 or, as I said, 60 open parts, the delay in those are kinda getting longer. The demand on us is, "Okay, we're gonna allocate so many to you, and you'll get it next April." The flip side is it's a non-cancellable order. I wish I had products like that. I would love to be in that business myself. It's getting better. Thank Still a challenge. I see. In terms of, maybe back to, Digital Imaging, you had mentioned, you know, a return to portfolio simplification activities. Now you've pruned a very small, loss-making product line. As you assess that portfolio having owned FLIR now for a few quarters, are you evaluating a potentially larger cost-cutting initiative or a divestiture, or is this kind of insulated and minimal? Yeah, I think it's the latter. No, we're in all of our products, in all of our businesses, we do 80/20, which means we take some products that are unique and they don't make money. We take the product lines out and then increase our products that are making us a lot of money. We're doing that at FLIR like we do at Teledyne. No, we're not gonna divest any large part of FLIR. We're happy with what we have, and we're actually probably gonna add some to certain areas. Very helpful color. If I could sneak in one more. You know, back to your comment on the supply chain, you mentioned that for some of the missing items, the lead times are getting longer. What's driving those incremental headwinds? I mean, I would think with some of the demand in other parts of semiconductors, for example, we're seeing roiling consumer demand. Shouldn't that free up capacity for your orders? I guess I'm just surprised that we're seeing some things continue to lengthen instead of you know, really get resolved sooner. Yeah. In some of the discrete components, like in the commercial domain, things are okay. They're improving. On the other hand, in some of the memory stuff, it's the length is getting longer, the lead times are longer. Depends on the complexity. Let me just kinda go through it. If you look at memory devices, lead times are getting lower. On the other hand, if you look at more complex devices, like microcontrollers, processors, the lead times are still 4-60 weeks. So it's kind of a mixture. That depends on what device we're looking for. For the simpler components and, as I said, printed circuit boards, we're making some real improvements there, and we feel very good about that. Some of those also require our people to go into the supplier's factory and schedule our products on a daily basis to get them out. It's a mixture. Great. Thank you very much. For sure. Next, we can go to Noah Poponak with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, everybody. Morning, Noah. Robert, just wanted to go back to your commentary around the bid-ask spread in the M&A process. You know, some other companies that have a similar strategy to yours have pointed to that, but it pretty recently suggesting that that hasn't really broken yet. You have a deal this morning. You're saying the pipeline looks good. You're, you know, quantifying what you could potentially spend in the immediate term. I guess maybe in some ways you've already answered this, but I'm just really curious to put a finer point. Like, now that, you know, public markets peaked, you know, almost a year ago, has that bid-ask spread challenge cracked and that spread has narrowed? Or are you just saying that it hasn't yet, but it eventually has to? I think in the private deals, it's probably cracked a little bit. The reason for that is private entrepreneurs are looking at things, they're looking at the world, Noah, the way it is evolving, right? The uncertainties in the future is becoming much more pronounced at this time. Entrepreneurs that have built a business like the one we just bought, those people have been in business since 1973, they're becoming more reasonable because they see things are not gonna get better in the short term. On the smaller deals like that, I think you're right. We're seeing somewhat better pricing. Having said that, on the bigger deals and public companies, they're still seeing 52-week highs in the background. Until we get beyond that, which is gonna be another six months, four months, where people are not looking at, "Look, my high was $500, and I'm now trading at $350." They look in the rearview mirror and say, "Well, my high was more like $400, and now we're at $350," then I think it's gonna be more actionable. Okay. It's helpful. You've referenced reducing cost and also price increases. Can you just provide a little bit more detail on where in the business you've done that and, you know, how sizable are we talking on each side? Yeah. It depends on the business. You know, some businesses, we have a hard time increasing prices because of the programs that we have, long-term programs. Let me just give you an example. In Digital Imaging DALSA e2v, for example, we've been able to increase prices about 4.7%. Mm-hmm. In marine, where we supply unmanned vehicle, but also a lot of connectivity products for oil and gas, we've also been able to increase prices about 4.7%. On the other hand, in some of our defense products, we have hardly raised price or gotten about 1% or 2%. Having said that, on the average across the company, our price increases have been about 3.6% year to date. Against that, we have wage increases that are 4%, and then products material that we buy that have been about 3.4%. That's excluding the extra 2% that we pay for scarce materials. Those, that's been a wash between the price increases and the inflation. Where we've hired is, of course, we're spending $50+ million extra on getting our scarce products. I think over time, that'll go away too. Okay. Lastly, which products or segments did you allow to roll off of FLIR? Just really, there was just an Altavian product that they bought in December 2020, about four or five months before we bought them. Actually, we were already in discussions with them, and they picked that up. It was basically an industrial commercial drone business and not in a very difficult market. There are 20 companies that's of that ilk that are competing with one another. Me, on that domain, I'd rather buy the truck and put in our very really advanced imaging systems on somebody else's truck. I don't wanna build those inexpensive trucks. That's the one. Okay. Thank you. For sure, Noah. Currently no further questions in queue. Thank you very much. We would, if you would be kind enough, operator, I'm gonna ask Jason to conclude our conference call, and then we'll stop. Thanks. Thanks, Robert. Again, thanks everyone for joining us this morning. Brad, if you could give the replay information at the end of the call, that would be great. If you have follow-up questions, certainly do feel free to call me as well. Bye-bye. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the call will be available for replay after 10 o'clock Pacific Time today and running through November 6 at midnight. You can access the AT&T replay system at any time by dialing