Welcome to Teledyne's first quarter Earnings Release Conference call. Here is our first speaker, Mr. Jason VanWees. Good morning and thanks everyone for joining us. This is Jason VanWees, Vice Chairman and we're about to begin our first quarter 2025 earnings release conference call. We released our earnings earlier this morning before the market opened. Joining me today are Teledyne's Executive Chairman Robert Mehrabian, CEO Edwin Roks, President and COO George Bobb and EVP, CFO Steve Blackwood, and finally Melanie Cibik, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary. After remarks by Robert, Edwin, George and Steve, we will ask for your questions. Of course, before we get started, attorneys have reminded me to tell you that all forward looking statements made this morning are subject to various assumptions, risks and caveats as noted in the earnings release and our SEC filings. Of course actual results may differ materially in order to avoid potential selective disclosures. This call is simultaneously being webcast and a replay via webcast and dial in will be available for approximately one month. Here is Robert. Thank you, Jason, and good morning everyone, and thank you for joining our earnings call. In the first quarter, we achieved many records, including first quarter total sales, which increased 7.4%, accelerating for two quarters in a row and growing at the greatest rate in years. Sales also increased organically in every segment. Furthermore, non-GAAP earnings per share and GAAP earnings per share and operating non-GAAP operating margin were also records for any first quarter. We are pleased to close the Qioptiq carve-out acquisition in the first quarter, but I should note also that a few months before closing, Qioptiq was awarded major new contracts with both the U.K. and German Ministry of Defense, resulting in multi-year acquired backlog. In any event, even excluding this acquired backlog, orders for Teledyne as a whole exceeded sales for the sixth consecutive quarter. We continue to execute our strategy which has delivered long- term results regardless of economic and political uncertainty, that is, maintained a balanced and resilient mix of commercial and government businesses across a broad range of geographies and markets, and we continue to improve margins in existing businesses and acquire and integrate complementary companies. Before further commenting on the quarter, I wanted to offer some perspective given the current unpredictable operating environment. While we're going to focus on what we can control, it's worth noting the following. Teledyne has never believed that offshoring U.S. Manufacturing and Technology was a wise action. As a result, we have little low cost country manufacturing, we are a net exporter, and most of our external sales are produced and sold within regions. To be specific, approximately 80% of our sales are from U.S. based on locations to U.S. based customers or our international locations to international customers. Of the remaining 20% of total sales, approximately 80%, or roughly 16% of the total, are U.S. export sales to international locations, but only 2% of total sales are U.S. export sales to China. Finally, just 4% of external sales are from Teledyne international locations to U.S. based customers where new tariffs may apply for our customers. Now regarding our own supply chain, we import relatively little from China and Mexico with the 2024 annual value of each less than $25 million. Our largest import from Canada is internal sales of unmanned air systems for the U.S. military, a large portion of which we believe would be subject to U.S. DoD duty free exemption. While we're not immune to the current 10+% of tariff rates or certainly the pre-pause Inauguration Day proposed tariff rates, we are certainly planning actions to protect margins as the landscape evolves. That includes seeking further exemptions under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and from the United States Department of Defense, as well as taking advantage of recent exemptions for import of certain electronic components and then finally of course, pricing actions where we find necessary. Turning to our full year sales and earnings outlook, we must assume that the market uncertainty will have some impact. While this is nearly impossible to quantify, we've assumed a negative sales impact of perhaps about 1% of annual sales offset by the Qioptiq acquisition resulting in 2025 estimated sales of approximately $6 billion. Also, while we exceeded our first quarter midpoint guidance of $4.85, $4.85, and we expect a contribution from Qioptiq, which is now included in our outlook, we think it's wise to maintain our full year earnings outlook. Edwin and George will now briefly comment on the performance of our four business segments. Thank you Robert. This is Edwin and I will report on the Digital Imaging Segment which represents approximately 52% of Teledyne's portfolio. First quarter 2025 sales increased 2.2% compared with last year. The performance last year reflected an increase in sales for both Teledyne and FLIR's defense and industrial business and relatively flat sales across the balance of our portfolio where increased sales of space based infrared detectors and semiconductors were largely offset by ongoing weakness in certain markets such as X-ray detectors for consumer discretionary sensitive dental markets. Non-GAAP operating margin improved 31 basis points primarily due to the contribution of FLIR as well as space- based sensor business. George will now report on the other three segments which represent the balance of Te levac Thanks Edwin. In the Instrumentation segment, which consists of our marine, environmental, and test and measurement businesses, first quarter total sales increased 3.9% versus last year with organic growth of 2.6%. Overall sales of marine instruments increased 9.5%, 6.5% of which was organic, due to both strong offshore energy and subsea defense sales. Sales of environmental instruments decreased 2% primarily due to lower sales of laboratory Instrumentation and emissions monitoring instruments. However, orders were strong for the first quarter, with a book-to-bill of 1.11 times. Sales of electronic test and measurement systems, which include oscilloscopes, protocol analyzers, and Ethernet traffic generators, increased 1.5% year- over- year. Instrumentation operating margin in the first quarter increased 97 basis points to 27% and 88 basis points on a non-GAAP basis to 27.9%. In the Aerospace and Defense Electronics segment, first quarter organic sales increased 7.8% driven by growth of defense electronics products. Including the two recent acquisitions, sales increased 30.6% overall. Segment operating profit increased year- over- year, but GAAP and non-GAAP segment margin decreased as expected due to transaction and integration costs as well as comparatively lower current margins in the new acquisitions. For the Engineered Systems segment, first quarter revenue increased 14.9% and segment operating profit increased 719 basis points due in part to an easy comparison with last year which included higher cost to complete estimates on certain programs that did not recur in Q1 2025. I will now pass the call back to Robert. Thank you, George. In conclusion, despite recent volatility in capital markets as well as economic uncertainty, our performance to date has been resilient and strong. Each of our total orders, sales, margins, and earnings increased in the first quarter while organic sales increased in each segment. We also completed two acquisitions and ended the quarter with a leverage ratio of just 1.8. While we cannot predict the future, I continue to believe our balanced mix of businesses, strong cash flow, healthy balance sheet, and acquisition pipeline creates more long term opportunities than risks for Teledyne if the current economic stress continues. I will now turn the call over to Steve. Thank you, Robert, and good morning. I will first discuss some additional financials for the quarter not covered by Robert and then I will discuss our second quarter and full year 2025 outlook. In the first quarter, cash flow from operating activities was $242.6 million compared with $291 million in 2024. Free cash flow, that is cash flow from operating activities, less capital expenditures, was $224.6 million in the first quarter of 2025 compared with $275.1 million in 2024. Cash flow decreased year- over- year in the first quarter due in part to lower customer cash advances received in the first quarter of 2025 compared with 2024. Capital expenditures were $18 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared with $15.9 million in 2024. Depreciation and amortization expense was $80.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared with $78 million. We ended the quarter with $2.5 billion in net debt. That is approximately $2.96 billion of debt less cash of $461.5 million. Now turning to our outlook, which includes the acquisitions of Micropac and Qioptiq. Management currently believes that GAAP earnings per share in the second quarter of 2025 will be in the range of $4-$4.15 per share, with non-GAAP earnings per share in the range of $4.95-$5.05. For the full year 2025, we believe that GAAP earnings per share will be in the range of $17.35-$17.83, and we are maintaining our prior non-GAAP outlook of $21.10-$21.50 per share. I will now pass the call back to Robert. Thank you, Steve. We would now like to take your questions. Operator, if you're ready to proceed with the questions and answers, please go ahead. Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your lineup. In the question queue. You may press star 2 if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment please, while we poll for questions. Thank you. Our first question is from Greg Konrad with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question. Good morning. Morning, Greg. Appreciate All the detail, but maybe just. To start with the tariffs. It seems like you took about one point out of revenues, including the M& A contribution. Can you maybe just level set us where you see the biggest potential impact and maybe how does that correlate it with expected organic growth for the year and also any change to expected FX headwinds? Yeah, actually the 1% that I took out for revenue was from the total that included acquisitions. So the total had increased because of the Qioptiq acquisition by $180 million. We took down about $100 million from this. Now the reality of the outlook is that the impact of—you're asking about tariffs first, Greg, I just want to make sure I have this right. I'm assuming it's all somewhat related. I guess just the thought process behind the, you know, one point of revenue that came out of the outlook and maybe where you expect that to impact the business the most. Yeah, I think most of that is really we're just looking at the GDP and assuming it's going to get a hit of 1%. Let's, it's a kind of a bigger picture. It's not going to affect a couple of our segments at all. It's going to probably affect a little bit of Digital Imaging and a little bit of instruments. I'm going to say in Digital Imaging maybe $20 million from before and in instruments maybe another 20, so you're looking at maybe 16 Digital Imaging, maybe 20 in instruments. I don't think it's going to affect our Aerospace and Defense or Engineering Systems. It's just a rounding up of what I think or what people think and I believe it that if things continue there's going to be about a 1% hit to the overall growth in our GDP. We're just taking it as a ballpark. I guess just, I guess more on the tariff side. You mentioned all of the moving pieces. I mean how do you think about the net impact? Just thinking about margins, given you mentioned some of the pricing and localized production, how do you think about the margin impact from those or potential margin impact? Yeah. Let me start, Greg, if I may. There are two components of the tariffs, as you well know. The first component is what happens to our supply chain and the increase in the cost of the supplies that we estimate that could be. We know that in 2024 about $700 million of our products, the supplies that we imported both internally and externally, are going to be affected. We assumed that if it goes from 1% to 15% the tariffs, you are going to have a 14% increase, which is about $100 million in cost, that we can mitigate some of that and reduce it to less than $70 million, which would probably drop to maybe $18 million a quarter. The second part of the tariffs is on the revenue side. That is how much is it going to affect our revenue? As I mentioned before, we think that that's going to have some effect only where we sell from U.S.-based locations to international customers and I said before less than 2% to China. 80% of what we make and sell is either made in the U.S. sold in the U.S. made internationally, sold internationally. Only 17% is based in locations selling to international customers from the U.S. and then only 4% from Teledyne international location back to the U.S. I think it's important to put those two in perspective because they're a little different. I look at the supply chain issue, which I just said could be as much as $18 million a quarter, in two ways. First, there's a similarity to what we experienced in 2021 and 2022 where we had to cough up a lot of money to brokers because of scarcity of materials, especially electronic components. Second, supplies that are coming in at a higher cost really impact the P& L immediately. They go initially in our inventory so they affect the balance sheet. We have inventory on hand. If you look at three to four turns a year, it does not really affect the immediate quarter. It is going to probably start rolling in in the Q3, Q4 and that is where we will see an increased cost of goods sold. This is all before we do our pricing actions. Yes, I am giving you a very long answer because I think I am going to get the same question multiple times. Yes, the tariffs are going to affect us. Overall GDP may go down 1%, we may go down 1%, but our revenue is still going to increase year- over- year. We are assuming with acquisitions our average revenue for the year would go up about 6%. I feel pretty good about all of the above. Maybe just sneaking in one last one. You said U.S. to international. Less than 2% of that's China. I believe China's maybe 5% of your total sales. Can you maybe just talk about what you're seeing into that region given I'm assuming that was probably already volatile before all of this. Just broader trends within China. Yeah, going back to the overall, overall is maybe 4%, not quite 5, 2 of it coming from us. So what do we sell there? One of the things that we sell there are avionic computers that go on board commercial airlines that have to be certified. We also sell oscilloscopes and protocol analyzers. Some of the avionics actually are going to go there regardless of tariffs because they're needed. If you're going to fly commercial airlines and have a certified system of that, then you go back and look at oscilloscopes that comes from us, high end oscilloscopes and that might affect us somewhat. And some of the machine vision stuff that might be affected, they're not US based really, they're foreign based products that we make. We make most of our machine vision products in Canada and in Europe. So they may be affected indirectly. Yeah, it's going to cause a little pain, but again, we'll make it up somewhere else. Appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you, Greg. Our next question is from Andrew Buscaglia with BNP Paribas. Hey, good morning everyone. Morning, Andrew. Hey Robert, on that comment of 1% coming out, can you comment about risk related to any government spending cuts that you're seeing? Is any of that contemplated in that? How do you see Teledyne managing through that? To be very honest, I don't think that's going to affect us. The kinds of cuts they're talking about with DoD. Yes, we do have things that may be at risk if they go to NASA. We have some NASA programs and others. In the bigger picture it might even be good for us in some ways because we participate in space programs in a very healthy way and that's one of the domains that we're actually increasing our revenue. We participate in space programs, both science space, which is pretty big for us, and we also participate in defense space. In the defense space, which is about 60% of our overall space programs, we think there's going to be growth from all of these activities going reduction and then increases in other domains. The answer to your question, the short and long answer to your question is that overall we believe that the effect to us is going to not be significant and if there is one, it will improve our defense programs in missile warning and tracking and intelligence surveillance, etc. etc. We have about 20 defense programs related to space at the current time. Okay, got it. I think it's a logical assumption in terms of how you're thinking about the top line. What are you seeing in terms of your short cycle sales more recently? Are you seeing that play out, some of the businesses getting worse? Specifically, can you comment on test. Measurement and machine vision, which have. Been struggling as of late? Y eah, I think the effects are going to be somewhat minimal. I think test and measurement may get affected a little bit. Overall, we think for the year test and measurement is going to be fairly flat. That I think is an effect. Instruments as a whole, which includes environmental, marine and test and measurement, I think is going to be okay. It's going to grow maybe 2.5-3%. Going back to machine vision, there are two parts to it, as you know, there's the FLIR part and that. Is. Doing actually pretty well, especially FLIR defense. There is some effect on the industrial cameras, especially infrared, handheld and stationary cameras, but that's going to be fairly flat year- over- year. We think what will happen in the FLIR side is the defense is doing so well that that will offset any negativity there. The only area of digital imaging that we believe it could affect is the continuing weakness in our sensor sales. Our cameras are coming back. This is legacy digital imaging. Our cameras are coming back a little slower than we hoped. Sensors are lagging even more because people who buy our sensors have to develop new cameras and the market incentives aren't really there. If you come back and look at it as a whole big picture, our book-to-bill across the company is 1.05. Our instruments book-to-bill is 1.04. Overall digital imaging book-to-bill is 1.11. Aerospace and Defense is slightly under 1 and Engineered Systems, which is very lumpy business, is under 1. We are not worried about that because we had revenue increases there. Overall I would say yeah, we will see some short-term effects in some of our short-cycle businesses, but overall we should be fine. Okay, very clear. Thank you. Our next question is from Jim Ricchiuti with Needham & Company. Hi, thanks. Good morning. Question about. Steps actions you may take in terms of offsetting some of the pressure that you might see on margins. Robert, I'm wondering how you're thinking about. Driving margin improvement in some of the newly acquired businesses over the next several quarters. Jim, that's a really grand question. First, if I look at the overall margin for the year across all of our businesses, we are projecting margin improvement of about 60 basis points for the year. Now in Q1, we had margin improvement of about 80 basis points year- over- year. One of the reasons that we think the margins are improvements are going to be slightly less is because of the acquisitions. If you take an acquisition like Qioptiq, which moves our needle a little bit, in the first quarter, their margins were lower, as we always have when we acquire a business, they're going to hit our Aerospace and Defense overall by 200 basis points. The way we look at it, every quarter going forward, their margins are going to improve as we have done with every acquisition in our portfolio, and eventually they'll have the same margins as everything else. In a way I look at it, I say, okay, what is the effect right now in Q1? We only had them for two months. For the year we're going to have them for 11 months. It's going to hit Aerospace and Defense margins somewhat, but I mean it's going to decrease it maybe 180 basis points. Our defense margins before that were 28%. Aerospace and Defense were 28.6%. They are going to improve every quarter. By next year it's all going to be fine. Every acquisition we've made does the same thing, lowers the margin, but actually contributes to the bottom line. As we said, we expect Qioptiq to add another $0.15 to our overall earnings. Got it. That's helpful, Robert. The follow up question I had is historically in periods like this, Teledyne has taken advantage of opportunities. I'm just wondering, are you seeing more, potentially more acquisition opportunities in the current environment or is it too early? It's a little early, but historically, as you said, Jim, every time there's been stress, economic stress, we've taken a little hit just like everybody else. They have done two things. The three times that I remember there were similar economic stresses. We increased our cash free cash flow. We had record cash flow. Last year we had a record cash flow of over $1 billion. I expect to have something close to that this year. As we come out of these things or even during these, we make acquisitions. In 2017, as example, we bought e2v following 2014-2016 depression. This year we bought Qioptiq and we also bought Micropac. Having said that, our pipeline is relatively healthy both in smaller and what we like to call mid sized acquisitions. We've already spent about $750 million in the first quarter buying two businesses. If we do not do anything else, our debt to EBITDA ratio, which is not 1.8, will go to 1.2 because of our cash generation. I am looking forward to making some acquisitions and it really depends on how competitive the environment is because there are some others doing the same thing as we are. There are some things available but we do not want to overpay them because if you overpay, then you pay for it later rather than sooner. Thanks very much. For sure. Our next question is from Jordan Iannone with Bank of America. Hey, good morning. Morning, Jordan. Could you guys talk a little bit about what you're expecting in? Your aerospace. Defense segment or FLIR? With the U.S. FY2026 budget moving to a trillion dollars and also European rearmament, where should we be looking to see Teledyne? Yeah, let me just first say let's just stay with defense for a second, two parts. Obviously, if U.S. defense increases, we're going to have increased sales. In Q1, our defense sales year- over- year increased about 18.7%. Now there are two parts. Obviously, U.S. defense is going to increase because we have some healthy products ranging from unmanned vehicles. Probably one of the only companies that I can name that have unmanned vehicles in the air, on the ground, and underwater vehicles. Second, the defense. We also of course make all kinds of components that go into the defense domain. FLIR makes some very unique products for our defense. Let me move to Europe because that's just as important. Currently, we sell in 2024, let's say we sell $447 million of product into European defense across many countries. If the defense budget, and that includes, by the way, I'm kind of taking Qioptiq that we just bought and going backwards and saying, well, how much did they sell last year? And so I'm putting that in that 447 and the small Micropac acquisition. If you look at our defense budget, it's about 3.3% of our GDP. European defense budgets at about $500 billion have been about 2% of the GDP. Everything we hear says they're planning to increase that to $800 billion-$900 billion over the next five years. As a minimum, we expect to maintain our share with what we have, which is the 447 growing proportionate to what they increase their budgets with ads. Furthermore, within considering the kinds of products that we make, we're going to enjoy getting more of the share of those, primarily due to the fact that we have unique products that they need like our, I just mentioned, our unmanned systems. Also, we have a good manufacturing footprint of our defense products in Europe. We have it in the U.K., we have it in Sweden, we have it in other locations. We make our unmanned vehicles, some of them in Iceland, we have them in Denmark, etc. There are two folds to it. One, we already enjoy it. Second, it's growing, we're going to grow with it. Third, there's going to be domestic manufacturing requirements that are going to go into all of the new programs which we enjoy our footprint in Europe. I said we don't have a manufacturing footprint in Southeast Asia. We've avoided it, but not in Europe because we bought a lot of businesses there and we've invested European defense. Got it. That's helpful. Thank you so much. Thanks. Our next question is from Damian Karas with UBS. Hey, good morning everyone. Good morning, Damian. Good morning. I was wondering if you might be able to clarify your prior comments about 1% lower GDP and factoring that into the full year guidance. Have you actually started seeing any slowdown in Digital Imaging and Instrumentation over say the last month since all this tariff news and the tit for tat started? Or are you just kind of de-risking because of this cloud of uncertainty, if you will? Because I guess if, you know, if I think about all those book-to-bill numbers that you cited, they were all pretty positive. I think you're twofold. First, we do see some weaknesses in certain areas, but there's nothing new about that test and measurement oscilloscopes. Some of the stuff we sell overseas, like to China, yeah, that's affected. I think you're right. It's my guess. It's a guess. Now somebody might say 1% is too much, somebody might say 1% is too little. That's my guess. If it turns out not to be there, I'd be very happy. I think we all will be. Thank you for that. Not to beat a dead horse here on tariffs, but you mentioned that some of the higher costs, you know, you won't see that in the P& L immediately as it sits in inventory. I'm just curious, have you taken any price action so far or made any adjustments in your supply chain to offset some of this cost inflation that you expect to creep in? Yeah, first, obviously just like 2020, 2021, 2022. Damian, we jumped on that very fast. First you got to do a good analysis of what's happening and how it's going to affect you. We start there. There are exemptions to those, as I mentioned. For example, we make a lot of unmanned vehicles in Canada and we import them to the U.S. We are studying very carefully to make sure that we enjoy the DoD exemptions in that domain. Sometimes you can also assemble some internal products in a different location where you manufacture the components and assemble them somewhere else. We are looking at that. Finally, we have to take price action where we're getting hurt and we will do that and we will pass some of that on. In totality there are a whole bunch of things. The most important one is the longer it takes for things to affect us, the better it is for us in terms of going from inventory to cost of goods sold and having time to take actions to offset what's coming our way. Pricing opportunities. We're going to use them wherever we can. In the first quarter we actually had a volume increase of 2.3% or so in our products, even with some pricing actions that we took. It worries me, but not a lot. Look, we've been through this before. Number of times and what you got to do is hunker down and do what you do best. Be very disciplined, do small things very well and do not expect miracles to happen. Makes total sense. Thanks a lot, Robert. Good luck out there. Thank you. Our next question is from Joe Giordano with TD Cowen. Hey guys, how are you? Morning Joe. Can you kind of go through the backlog with us? I know you mentioned it's at all time highs, but there was also some acquired backlog of some major multi year stuff you got from Qioptiq. Like how did that look, excluding that? The Qioptiq backlog that we required increased about $60 million because of the two new firms programs. Overall backlog I think year- over- year is at the highest we've had. Including Qioptiq, it's about, I'm going to say about $4 billion, which for us is pretty healthy. Of that about $450 million is Qioptic. So 10% Qioptic, the rest legacy Teledyne. You know, some of that is obviously multi year. The way we look at it always is what is your book-to-bill in each quarter annualized and how are you doing in the short cycle? Businesses that you don't have much backlog, that's the one area that we're always very concerned and always very attentive to because some products we book and ship in two, three weeks. Some of our products, environmental products, maybe a month. Some of our cameras, whether infrared or visible, could be two weeks to four weeks. That is the area that we kind of keep an eye on very carefully. The longer term backlog, I do not worry too much about that. Yeah, what about on the, you know, some of the stuff that if we talk about DOGE and some of the, you know, NASA stuff that you have that's more personnel at flight control kind of things. What, like, can you talk about the margin profile of the things that are at risk versus the margin profile of the things that you think are still growing? On the margin profile of things like space, like the space station where we do a lot of work in, you know, designing experiments, training astronauts, coordinating space flights, whatever, that's our lowest margin business. It's in the 6-7%. The overall margins in our engineered systems business, which includes both fixed cost and cost plus half and half, are the lowest margins in the company, around 10%. Having said that, some of the space stuff that's coming out, whether it's the Golden Dome, whether it's putting satellites in space to be able to do look down at what missile warning and tracking, some of the ground based simulation stuff, those are our higher margin businesses and of course our unmanned systems. If you add them all up, if we, let's say something happens to the NASA budget, yeah, we'll take a hit in revenue, but it's not going to affect us too much in our bottom line because that's our lowest margin business. On the flip side, if that money is not reprogrammed into other space programs, we're going to enjoy those because we have very healthy margins and we have tremendous heritage in space. Just to give you an example in the science space, which in a way translates to our military and defense space, we've participated in 162 missions, science missions. We have spent 1.8 mission years in space. We have a lot of detectors, almost 1,000 detectors out there with zero device failures. When the government starts investing in this space, they're going to look for companies like ours that can actually make those very sophisticated stuff that they have made before and have a track record. I think if those things flips the way it looks like that is some low margin businesses may go away, higher margin businesses, more difficult things to make come back. I think it'd be to our advantage. Yeah, I think that's an important point. If I could just sneak in one last thing. The stuff that you're selling to China outside of the, like the commercial air avionics stuff that you said is, you know, it has to go regardless. Is the rest of that stuff, you know, I'm thinking oscilloscopes and environmental kind of environmental equipment, is that basically at zero now? Like with tariffs at 140, is that like effectively an embargo? When tariffs are that high. You can say that it's not zero, but it's going down. Yeah, you know, everybody's waiting to see what happens. Some of our distributors are putting a hold on things. Some of them are taking the higher cost materials because they have no choice. We'll deal with that. You know, when you look at export to China at 2%, half of it is really not going to be affected. Yeah, I worry about that, but I don't worry too much about it. You know, we don't make stuff in China that we bring to the U.S., that's for sure. Some of our cameras go to China. Some of our stuff like X-ray detectors for dental systems. We've already suffered the consequences of China, like everybody else does when they sell product there, we sell product there. Pretty soon the product is imitated, produced and sold at a lower cost. What you got to do is move up market and make more sophisticated products continuously. It worries me, but not a whole lot. Thanks, guys. Our next question is from Guy Hardwick with Freedom Capital Markets. Hi, good morning. Morning guys. I know you touched on it earlier, but could you mind just maybe explaining a little bit more about the Canadian business? I mean your filings reveal it's a substantial business. Could you how much of obviously DALSA based there, how much of the business is commercial versus government because as you said that the government business may be exempt from tariffs and there's also those content rules. I understand that if a product is as much as 20% U.S. content, it could be exempt as well. That's my first question. Just second question on those $700 million of COGS, I presume that is components for imported into the U.S. Yeah, let me answer the second question first because I have it in my head right away. I got to kind of dig the rest up on the $700 million. It's composed of two parts, things that we make and bring in the U.S., and then supplies, like material supplies that we buy, including electronics that go into products that we make in the U.S. If you go to just the stuff that we make and bring into the U.S., those would be both commercial and defense. Some of the defense stuff, like I mentioned, unmanned air vehicles, obviously the U.S. DoD is buying them because they need them and use them. Some of the commercial stuff, like cameras, they might be subject to, within that $700 million, they might be subject to the 10% or so tariff. We'll work with that. It's not, as I said before, multiple times, forgive me if I repeat myself, it won't affect us immediately because that stuff goes into inventory. We already have inventory that's going to be used to make products. Let's say for Q2 and the inventory rolls three to four times a year. We've seen some of it in Q3, then a full growing Q4 maybe. In the meantime there's a lot of things that can happen, including actions that we take. Now, going back to how much we make in Canada, I have to say that there's two sides to that. We make, as I said, drones and military products. We have about 2,000 in Europe. In Canada, we have, I'm going to say maybe 2,000 employees. If you take the average revenue per employee in Canada, I don't know, it'd be maybe $250,000 per employee. You can multiply that out. I'm talking about, what, $500 million, you know, made in Canada. The beauty of Teledyne is we don't make everything anywhere else except the U.S. We make pieces of things here in Canada, pieces of it in England, pieces of it in Iceland, pieces of it in Netherlands, which spread across western countries. That's good for us because where we make stuff in Europe, that's not going to be subject to European tariffs. Obviously, yes, we're going to have to take some hits if this environment continues. I worry about it, but it doesn't keep me up at night. Just to be clear. I mean, you're saying it's a fairly balanced business between commercial and government, or is it more weighted towards government in Canada? I would think most of it more commercial than government because our defense business coming from Canada is not that large. I would say 70-30, 80-20 of that. I do not have the numbers in front of me, and I do not want to take guesses, but I can get you those numbers and have Jason supply to you. Thank you. For sure. Our next question is from Rob Jamieson with Vertical Research Partners. Hey, good morning. Just a couple quick ones. Just one clarification on tariffs. Sorry I joined late, but the underlying. Tariff rates that you're assuming on the. Impacts and everything that you laid out, which is very clear, is that like China at 145% and then just what's been presented by the administration so far? Yeah, I guess you can say China of that order, if maybe a little higher, maybe 150-160%. Canada, 25%. United Kingdom, 11%. France, 10%, Denmark, 10%. And then when you roll it all up, it's about 15% across our portfolio. Perfect, thank you. Just on capital allocation, I appreciate the color you gave on acquisitions. How to that looks, but how. Should we think about prioritization between deleveraging? Buybacks over the next couple quarters? Let me go to the buybacks. We bought our stock back only two times, and we bought them back when our stock price went below what we thought was prudent. We bought stock back in 2015 to 2016, about $100 a share. We bought, let's say, about $325 million of our stock. Last year our stock dropped to $353, $355 or so and we bought it, but then we stopped when it hit $400. It is very important to look at the window of when we buy the stock. We can always buy the stock, but it is prudent. We can get much better returns in buying companies, improving them and having both revenue and EPS attrition like we are talking about Qioptiq as a recent example or FLIR three years ago. The buyback would be exceptions. When our stock is low and there's nothing really available that we can look at, our preference is always to buy companies. So we'll buy back opportunistically when we have to or we have nothing else to do. In terms of capital. Right now we're sitting at 1.8, by the way, we have long term debt that Steve mentioned and we have cash. If you look at our long term debt, it's all fixed and it's fixed at average of about 2.4% and it spreads from two years hence up to 2029, 2030. Frankly we can pay that down, but it would be stupid because we can get better interest rates in the immediate market than what we're paying. We're generating cash, we're sitting at 1.8. If we don't do anything, our debt to EBITDA ratio will go down to one point by year end. If we do not do anything another year, we will go down to 0.5. We have a lot of muscle to buy things, and we will if the price is right and if it strategically fits with what we are doing. We are not going to just go out and buy stuff because it is available, we are going to buy stuff that we can run. It fits with our portfolio and our strategy. We generate about $1 billion of cash a year, so we are going to be fine. That is great, very clear, thank you. One last one on Test and Measurement notes. A small business for you guys. Looks broadly in line with expectations. Any puts and takes you can give us just on the end markets that? You served there and how trading developed through the quarter. Yeah, we sell primarily two products and one smaller product. The primary product that we sell are oscilloscopes and primarily high end oscilloscopes. High bandwidth, high frequency. The second thing we sell are protocols. Protocols are basically the rules with which devices communicate with one another or devices communicate with the cloud. We also have a very small piece of Ethernet generators that we bought which is growing fast, but it's small. It used to be $15 million, it's going to be $30 million. The primary products we make are oscilloscopes and protocols and they can be somewhat affected by economic circumstances because there's capital equipment, especially oscilloscopes in Q1. Protocols went up, the revenue oscilloscopes went down, Ethernet generators went up. There is one thing that we do that is very unique in that we also use our oscilloscopes in our protocol analyzers. That is a unique offering that we are able to make since we have such a strong position in protocols, so we can sell things, protocol analyzers that utilize our oscilloscopes. All in all, it is a nice, beautiful business with very high margins, but it is subject to economic downturns. Great. Thank you. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'd like to hand the floor back over to management for any closing comments. Thank you, Paul. I'll ask Jason to conclude our conference call. Thanks, Robert. Thanks everyone for joining us this morning. If you have follow up questions, certainly feel free to call me or send me a note. My number is on the earnings release. Thank you everyone and talk to you later. Bye. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.