Good morning. My name is Glenn, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Timken's fourth quarter earnings release conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remark, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star, then the number two on your telephone keypad. Thank you. Mr. Frohnapple, you may begin your conference. Thanks, Glenn, and welcome everyone to our fourth quarter 2022 earnings conference call. This is Neil Frohnapple, Director of Investor Relations for The Timken Company. We appreciate you joining us today. Before we begin our remarks this morning, I wanna point out that we have posted presentation materials on the company's website that we will reference as part of today's review of the quarterly results. You can also access this material through the Download feature on the earnings call webcast link. With me today are The Timken Company's President and CEO, Rich Kyle, and Phil Fracassa, our Chief Financial Officer. We will have opening comments this morning from both Rich and Phil before we open up the call for your questions. During the Q&A, I would ask that you please limit your questions to one question and one follow-up at a time to allow everyone a chance to participate. During today's call, you may hear forward-looking statements related to our future financial results, plans, and business operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected or implied due to a variety of factors, which we describe in greater detail in today's press release and in our reports filed with the SEC, which are available on the timken.com website. We have included reconciliations between non-GAAP financial information and its GAAP equivalent in the press release and presentation materials. Today's call is copyrighted by The Timken Company, and without express written consent, we prohibit any use, recording, or transmission of any portion of the call. With that, I would like to thank you for your interest in The Timken Company. I will now turn the call over to Rich. Thanks, Neil. Good morning, thank you for joining our call. Timken delivered another excellent quarter, which concluded an outstanding year. Organic revenue in the fourth quarter was up 10%. Demand continued to be strong with North America and Asia both up double digits. Price contributed meaningfully to the fourth quarter revenue gain, and our outgrowth initiatives also added to the results. Fourth quarter EBITDA margins improved 380 basis points from prior year, with improved price-cost being the largest driver. Earnings per share of $1.22 was a record for the fourth quarter and was up 56% from prior year. We also closed on the GGB Bearings acquisition and the Aerospace Drive Systems divestiture and purchased 250,000 shares. Free cash flow in the quarter was very strong at $186 million. For the full year, we delivered 9% total growth and around 12% organic growth, which was the second consecutive year of double-digit organic growth. Organic growth was at least 10% all four quarters of the year, and we start 2023 with very good momentum. EBITDA margins of 19% were up 160 basis points from 2021 and were more consistent through the course of the year. Our price realization exceeded the 4% that we guided to at the beginning of the year, and price improved sequentially each quarter for the second straight year. The rate of cost increases leveled off around mid-year, but costs were up over prior year each quarter, and we remain in an inflationary environment. There have been a lot of moving pieces on costs. Steel and logistics were the early inflationary pressures. They have both eased off peak. Labor, energy, other material, and SG&A costs all increased. Internal inefficiencies from supply chain and labor challenges were better than 2021 and improved through the course of the year but remained elevated. Earnings per share of $6.02 was 28% over last year's record level. Free cash flow of $285 million was up from prior year. In addition to the M&A, we continued to invest about 4% of sales in CapEx for growth and cost initiatives. We advanced our products, advanced our footprint, improved our productivity, invested in our digital platform, and expanded our capacity through these investments. We also purchased about 4% of our outstanding shares during the year. We ended the year with a strong balance sheet. We were also named one of America's most responsible companies by Newsweek for the third year in a row. This recognition underscores our commitment to being an excellent corporate citizen. We are driving sustainability through the products we make, the industries we serve, and across our global operations. We also invest in the development of our people, the diversity of our workforce, and safety across the enterprise. In summary, 2022 was a very good year for industrial demand but also had a lot of unexpected challenges. We once again capitalized on the opportunities while navigating through and responding to the challenges to deliver outstanding results for both our customers and our shareholders. Before I turn to 2023, I wanna highlight slide 12 in our quarterly deck. This slide is from our recent Investor Day and is updated for our 2022 results and our new adjusted EPS definition. Through the five-year period, we delivered an 8% revenue CAGR, an 18% earnings per share CAGR, and an average EBITDA margin of 18.5%, with only 180 basis points of margin variation through the five years. When you reflect back on the macroeconomic volatility through that five-year period, from tariffs, pandemics, inflation, supply chain challenges, and more, these results demonstrate the resiliency of the demand for our products and technology, the diversity of our business, and our commitment and capability to drive value through economic cycles. While uncertainty remains elevated today, Timken is well positioned to continue to create value in years to come through industrial cycles and through evolving technologies. Timken enters 2023 a larger and better version of the company that we were in 2018. We are confident that we will be able to continue the trajectory of this performance in the years to come. We expect that 2023 will be a good start to the next five years. Turning to 2023, I will start with our recently announced acquisitions. First, American Roller Bearing, or ARB. ARB has been family owned and operated in the United States for three generations. They have a long-standing position in the U.S. Process Industries markets. They have a large installed base of products throughout the U.S. and sell primarily through bearing distributors to a fragmented base of OEMs and end users. These are markets and channels that Timken knows very well, and we are confident that we can create value for customers and shareholders through integrating ARB in Timken's engineered bearings portfolio. ARB enters the portfolio at modest EBITDA margins, but we expect over time to get it to Process Industries level margins. Nadella will add a combination of new products to our portfolio and also expand existing product lines and market positions. The largest product line is linear motion and actuators. The product complements and scales our linear motion platform, and we will deliver strong synergies with our Rollon business. Nadella also brings industrial needle roller bearings, ball screws, and rod ends to the portfolio. Timken entered the rod end market with the 2020 acquisition of Aurora, and adding Nadella will globalize our rod end market position. Nadella will further scale our position in several of our targeted markets as they serve a fragmented customer base across markets like automation, packaging, food and beverage, logistics, and medical. Nadella will join Timken with a margin profile slightly above the company average. With synergies, we will both expand margins and accelerate the global growth rate. We're excited to be adding both ARB and Nadella to our portfolio. Upon completion, we will remain comfortably within our targeted leverage ratios. With our 2023 cash flow, we can continue to be opportunistic with capital allocation opportunities through the year. Turning to our markets in slide seven in the deck, we are guiding to a 3% organic revenue increase in total. We expect price to be over 2% for the year. Price comprises over half of the organic revenue outlook. We are confident in achieving at least the 2% price. Starting on the right, we are expecting a strong full year in renewables driven by Asia wind, both from the market as well as from our outgrowth tactics. This is a market where we have good visibility into demand for several quarters out. The order book and backlog are strong. Customers are committed to a step-up in revenue for the full year. We're planning for the rest of our markets to range from flattish to up mid-single digits. I'll talk more about the first quarter in a moment. This guide assumes we will start the year well above the 3% level and then moderate in the second half of the year, partly from tougher comps, but primarily from taking a cautious view of the markets where we do not have extended visibility. We are also anticipating some channel inventory pullback in this outlook as supply chains improve and customers return to managing inventory with higher precision. If our outlook for the second half proves to be low, we will be in excellent position to capitalize on the situation. From a margin standpoint, we are guiding to roughly flat margins for the year. As I said in my 2022 comments, there have been a lot of moving pieces on the cost and margin front, and that continues into 2023. We are expecting price-cost to be modestly positive for the full year. We also expect margin help from better operational execution, supply chain improvements, our 2022 CapEx and footprint investments, and lower steel and logistics costs. However, we remain in an inflationary environment, and we do anticipate further cost increases in SG&A, labor, and other purchased materials. Currency and mix are also expected to be margin headwinds for the year. We have been dealing with a rising and volatile cost situation for a couple of years. I'm confident that we will successfully navigate through the price-cost dynamics again in 2023. Earnings per share would be up about 5% at the midpoint. We expect much stronger cash flow in 2023, primarily from higher earnings and lower working capital requirements due to both moderating growth rates as well as improved supply chain execution. While we are taking a cautious view on the second half, we are starting the year strong. We have good visibility for the first quarter and well into the second quarter. We expect organic revenue to be up high single digits in the first quarter. We have a healthy backlog, good order input, and the benefit of another sequential price improvement. We would also expect our normal sequential step-up in margins from the fourth quarter to the first. In summary, we delivered an excellent year in 2022, both strategically and financially. We are off to an excellent start to 2023. We're in a great position to extend our strong performance. We're excited about the opportunities in front of us. We feel confident in our ability to continue to create shareholder value for our long term as we continue to advance Timken as a diversified industrial leader. Okay, thanks, Rich. Good morning, everyone. For the financial review, I'm gonna start on slide 14 of the presentation materials with a summary of our strong fourth quarter results, which capped off a record year for Timken. We posted revenue of close to $1.1 billion in the quarter, up over 7% from last year. We delivered an adjusted EBITDA margin of 17.2% with strong year-over-year margin expansion. We achieved record fourth quarter adjusted earnings per share of $1.22, up 56% from last year and over 20% higher than our next best fourth quarter. Turning to slide 15, let's take a closer look at our sales performance. Organically, fourth quarter sales were up 10.2% from last year, driven by strong growth across most end markets and sectors and with healthy contributions from both volume and pricing. Looking at the rest of the revenue walk, foreign currency translation was a sizable headwind in the quarter, driven by a stronger US dollar against the euro and other key currencies. The impact of acquisitions net of divestitures contributed modestly to the top line. On the right-hand side of the slide, you can see organic growth by region, which excludes both currency and acquisitions. Let me touch briefly on each region. In Asia Pacific, we were up 19%, driven by strong growth across the region, with renewable energy and distribution posting the strongest sector gains. In North America, our largest region, we were up 13%, with most sectors up led by off-highway, distribution, and general and heavy industrial. In Latin America, we were up 5%, driven mainly by year-over-year growth in distribution. Finally, in EMEA, we were down slightly as lower renewable energy revenue and lost Russia sales were mostly offset by growth in other sectors. Notably, if you exclude Russia, we would've been up modestly in the region for the quarter. Turning to slide 16. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter was $186 million or 17.2% of sales, compared to $135 million or 13.4% of sales last year. Looking at the increase in Adjusted EBITDA dollars, we benefited from strong price mix and higher volume in the quarter, which more than offset the impact of unfavorable net manufacturing performance and higher SG&A other expense. As you can see on the walk, material and logistics costs were relatively flat year-on-year, a significant improvement from the sizable headwinds we've experienced over the past several quarters. Overall, we delivered an incremental EBITDA margin of 68% on the higher sales, driven by our positive price-cost performance, which enabled us to expand margins by 380 basis points versus the fourth quarter of last year. Let me comment a little further on a few of the key drivers in the quarter. With respect to price mix, pricing was meaningfully higher in both Mobile Industries and Process Industries, reflecting our significant pricing actions over the past year. Mix was also positive, driven by our strong growth in attractive sectors like industrial distribution. Moving to material and logistics. As I mentioned, the year-over-year impact in the quarter was largely neutral, as higher material costs from continued supplier price increases were mostly offset by lower logistics and transportation costs. I would also point out that material and logistics costs were down sequentially from the third quarter. On the manufacturing line, we were negatively impacted by continued cost inflation, including energy and labor, as well as lower production volume. We were also impacted by higher costs that had been capitalized to inventory in prior periods. This will continue to be a headwind in 2023. On the positive side, we're seeing improved execution from our teams around the world as supply chain and other constraints continue to ease. We should also benefit more in 2023 from our manufacturing footprint actions and other self-help initiatives. Finally, on the SG&A other line, costs were up in the fourth quarter, driven by higher compensation expense and other spending to support the increased sales levels. I would point out that SG&A expense was in line with our expectations and up only slightly organically from the third quarter run rate. On slide 17, you can see that we posted net income of $97 million or $1.32 per diluted share for the quarter on a GAAP basis, which includes $0.10 of net income from special items. On an adjusted basis, we earned $1.22 per share, up 56% from last year and a record for the fourth quarter. You'll note that we benefited from a lower share count in the quarter, reflecting the significant buyback activity we've completed over the past year. Lastly, the higher interest expense and 25 and a half% adjusted tax rate were in line with our expectations. Let's move to our business segment results, starting with Process Industries on slide 18. For the fourth quarter, Process Industries sales were $586 million, up 11.1% from last year. Organically, sales were up 13 and a half% driven by growth across all sectors with distribution, heavy industries, and general industrial posting the strongest gains in the quarter. Pricing was positive once again, and net acquisitions contributed nearly three percentage points of growth to the top line. Currency translation was a sizable headwind in the quarter, reducing growth by over 5%. Process Industries adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter was $143 million or 24.4% of sales, compared to $105 million or 20% of sales last year. The increase in process segment margins reflects the benefit of positive price-cost and higher volume, which more than offset the impact of higher manufacturing and SG&A costs in the quarter. Let's turn to Mobile Industries on slide 19. In the fourth quarter, Mobile Industries sales were $496 million, up 3.3% from last year. Organically, sales increased 6.4%, with the off-highway and rail sectors posting the largest revenue gains. We were also up in heavy truck, while aerospace and automotive were relatively flat. Pricing was positive once again, while net acquisitions contributed modestly. Currency translation was a headwind in the quarter, reducing growth by nearly 4%. Mobile Industries adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter was $56 million or 11.3% of sales, compared to $41 million or 8.6% of sales last year. The increase in Mobile segment margins was driven by the benefit of positive price-cost, which more than offset the impact of higher manufacturing and SG&A costs. Notably, Mobile margins were up sequentially from the third quarter, which is unusual given our seasonality and reflects a moderation of costs over the past few months. Turning to slide 20, you can see that we generated operating cash flow of $242 million in the quarter. After CapEx, free cash flow was $186 million or more than triple what we delivered last year. Looking at the full year, free cash flow was $285 million, up from $239 million in 2021. The higher free cash flow was driven mainly by earnings growth, which more than offset the impact of higher working capital to support the record sales levels, as well as higher CapEx to fund our growth and operational excellence initiatives. During the year, Timken paid $92 million in dividends or $1.31 per share, making 2022 the ninth consecutive year of higher annual dividends per share. In addition, we repurchased over three million shares of stock during the year or about 4% of total shares outstanding, and we have nearly six million shares remaining on our current authorization. We also completed the acquisitions of GGB and Spinea. With those acquisitions, 2022 marks the 13th straight year where Timken has made at least one acquisition. When you take into account our CapEx, dividends, net acquisitions, and share buybacks, Timken deployed just over $900 million of capital in 2022, and we did it while maintaining a strong balance sheet. Turning to the balance sheet, we ended the year with net debt to adjusted EBITDA at 1.9 times, well within our targeted range. In addition, we completed several debt financings during the year to provide us with additional financial flexibility, including a $350 million issuance of 10-year bonds back in March at an attractive fixed rate. We also refinanced and upsized both our revolver and U.S. term loan in December, extending their maturities to 2027. With our strong capital structure and cash flow, we remain in a great position to continue to drive shareholder value creation in 2023, we're off to a great start with ARB and Nadella. Let's turn to the outlook with a summary on slide 21. As Rich highlighted, we expect strong top and bottom line performance again in 2023, with a large step-up in free cash flow generation. Starting on the sales outlook, we're planning for another year of record revenue, with sales up 4%-8% in total or 6% at the midpoint versus 2022. Organically, we're planning for revenue to be up about 3% at the midpoint, driven by positive pricing and modest volume growth, with our volume assumptions reflecting some prudent cautiousness around the second half, given our limited visibility. We expect acquisitions net of divestitures to contribute around 3.5% to our revenue for the full year. This includes the recent ARB acquisition but does not include Nadella. We will include Nadella in our outlook after the deal closes, which will be around the end of the first quarter. Finally, we expect currency translation to be a 50 basis point headwind at the top line for the full year based on December 31st spot rates. On the bottom line, we expect record adjusted EPS in the range of $6.50-$7.10 per share, which represents around 5% growth at the midpoint versus last year on a comparable basis. Note that the guidance range reflects our new definition for adjusted EPS, which excludes acquisition intangible amortization expense of roughly $0.50 per share. I'll come back to this later in my remarks. The midpoint of our earnings outlook implies that our 2023 consolidated adjusted EBITDA margin will be roughly in line with 2022. Note that our margin assumption reflects a sizable headwind from currency off the positive impact we saw last year. Organically, we should see strong incrementals as favorable price-cost momentum and improved operational execution should more than offset headwinds from higher manufacturing and SG&A costs, lower production volume, and unfavorable mix. Moving to free cash flow. We expect to generate approximately $400 million for the full year 2023, or approximately 90% conversion on net income at the midpoint. This is over $100 million higher than 2022 and reflects the impact of improved earnings and working capital performance. We're estimating CapEx at around 4% of sales for the year, with the spend continuing to fuel our long-term growth and operational excellence initiatives. Finally, we anticipate higher interest expense, and we expect our adjusted tax rate to remain around 25.5%. Turning to slide 22, let me comment further on the revision to our adjusted EPS calculation. As I mentioned, our new definition for adjusted earnings excludes acquisition and tangible amortization expense, which has grown in recent years with the cumulative amount of acquisitions we've made. Overall, we believe this change will provide a better representation of our core operating earnings and improve comparability of our performance versus peers. To summarize, the company delivered strong results again in the fourth quarter to finish another record year. Our team continues to win in the marketplace and drive our profitable growth strategy. We're off to a strong start in 2023, and we're well positioned to continue to scale as a diversified industrial leader through any environment. This concludes our formal remarks, and we'll now open the line for questions. Operator? Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to ask a question, simply press star, then one on phone keypad. With our first question comes from Steve Barger from KeyBanc CM. Steve, your line is now open. Thanks. Good morning. Good morning. Good morning, Steve. Rich, you said price is 2% of the 3% organic growth. If I go back to slide seven, you have the worst case for the four sectors is flat, and most of the sectors are mid-single digit or better. Can you talk about which of the end markets, if any, you think are gonna have negative volume growth this year? Yeah, I mean, we don't specifically split out the volume versus the price. Certainly if, you know, those middle markets all have price realized over the last year on them. If they end up, at zero, their volume would be down a little bit. It sounds to me like you're taking a pretty conservative approach just based on what this slide looks like, since you do expect positive price-cost. I guess I'm trying to get to the idea of whether you really think volume is negative or positive in 2023 for most of your end markets? Well, it's certainly not negative to start the year. If you look at this slide seven, we have four markets on this slide that we have visibility well into the second half on: renewable energy, aerospace, heavy industries, and marine. The four markets where we have good visibility into the second half volume as well as price, we're all overall four of them projecting to be up mid-single digits or more for the full year. As I said, we're looking to be up high singles organically in the first quarter. Certainly to get to these numbers for the full year, you'd have a moderating, you know, from high single digits down to low single digits as the year advanced in total. As you look at your internal model, do you show positive growth in the back half or in 4Q specifically, or do you expect that that goes negative in the back half? With price, we'd be still modestly positive. Great. Thanks for the time. I'd also wanna emphasize again, as we, as you depart there, Steve, again, we don't have visibility into that and we're taking a, you know, cautious outlook into it. Again, we're starting the year up. We just finished the fourth quarter up 10 and starting the year up, high singles. Understood. Thanks. Thank you, Steve. Our next question comes from David Raso from Evercore ISI. David, your line is now open. Hi. Thank you. Been jumping between calls, so sorry if I missed this. Earlier you said mix would be part of why margins only flattish year-over-year. Did I miss some growth guide particular to Process versus Mobile, where Mobile's up more? I'm just trying to figure out why would the mix be down or was there something unique toward the end of 2022 that really skewed the mix? I mean, obviously Process in general, right, gives you the better margins. Did I miss something about the bigger mix comment or is there even something within Process? I don't think we made a comment. Within Process, as you look at slide seven, with renewable up high singles and distribution flattish, that's negative mix within Process. You know, we would actually It's a little destock at distribution. That's sort of the. Yeah. The play there a little bit. I'd say a little bit of destock and just moderating, you know, more of a sell-through. A couple of our U.S. distributors have made statements that they're looking to manage inventory a little tighter this year. But again, within that, we would expect within this guide for Mobile margins to be up a little bit, Process margins to be down a little bit. As Phil also said, you have the currency impact across both. Yeah, I was just gonna comment, David Raso. As Rich Kyle said, I mean, our mix is really driven by the, you know, obviously the mix of OEM, not just in Process, but across the company. The OEM growth versus the distribution or aftermarket growth. You know, we have both the distribution and services. Sectors, if you will, sort of neutral for the year, but we got renewables up, you know, high single digits +, as well as a lot of the other OEM markets up. That dynamic compared to 2022, where distribution was up significantly, is producing a little bit of a mix headwind, which would affect Process a little bit more than Mobile. Mobile, a lot of the self-help we've been talking about, over the course of the year around footprint and consolidations and the like, should help Mobile, as Rich said, improve margins year-over-year, with Process feeling a little bit of a headwind, net-net, roughly neutral, year-over-year, at least as we've assumed it in the guide. Okay. No, that adds a little more, you know, legitimacy to the guide. Just distribution is such a, you know, powerful force in that business. The destock, if you can give us a little bit of insight on those conversations you've had. I think distribution's what... I'm not including services, just truly distribution. Was it 40-45% of the division? Something like that, if I remember correctly. How long is the destock when you speak to them? Is it sort of a just a slow grind down over the course of the year? Or is it more of. I think-. You know- No, I think it's- They're ready to go? You know, I wouldn't overplay it. It's not a increase in inventory, which is what we've had the last two years, right? Again, as you look at the comps, they've been building inventory. Even a leveling off, and going to the self-through rate is a reduction. Mm-hmm ... or a tougher comp. I wouldn't say there's a big destocking, but lead times have improved. Transit times have come down. Over-ordering is over. We're just anticipating a little bit of a headwind from that. I think we already had a little bit of a headwind with that in the fourth quarter. Still grew 10% organically. We expect a little bit more in the next couple quarters. All right. That's helpful. Not as much absolute destock, just was a little more of a. Right ... benefit in 2022 that we can't... Exactly. Okay. That's helpful. Yeah. Thank you so much. The extended supply chains. I mean, the extended supply chains have had a lot of stranded inventory in the supply chain that I think is coming out. All right. Terrific. Thank you. Thank you, David. Thank you, David. With our next question comes from Rob Wertheimer from Melius Research. Rob, your line is now open. Thank you. Just to clarify, so I guess I went into the call assuming there'd be a channel inventory drawdown there, and the effect that you're calling out is more that prior years had an inflow from, you know, distributors and others taking more inventory. You're not anticipating a large drawdown in this guide? A large drawdown? No. I would not say there's a large drawdown. There's a drawdown, but not a large one. Okay. Just a quick question on pricing then. You've obviously captured a lot. Your margins have reflected that in the last couple quarters, especially. Are you back to kinda neutral-ish with the 2% outlook for next year? Is there still more catch-up to go and that's embedded in the two? Are you still working on getting catch-up pricing as contracts or other things roll through? Just in general, it's been a tumultuous couple of years for pricing. I wonder if you could step back and just comment on your overall structural initiatives, you know, COVID and inflation out of the picture for how you're capturing price. Thank you. I think if you added our two years of walks, maybe two years and a quarter, because it really started in nine-10 quarters ago with the inflation, we would be close to neutral, maybe slightly behind, with a little bit of offset into our volume. We're close to neutral. The 2%, more than 2% is expected to very modest, is expected to be slightly better than neutral. We're looking at roughly neutral. Then to your latter question, you know, we feel good about our ability to capture price. We feel good about our ability to respond to volatility in commodity prices and supply chain issues, et cetera. I think we've demonstrated that. We've got, as we talked before, we've got thousands of customers and a lot of complexity in our price, which tends to make it sticky and also tends to make it, you know, a little more complicated, when these things happen than just pushing a button and raising prices in a matter of a week or a month or a quarter. We're there now. We've got good systems and processes and feel good about being able to adjust to whatever comes our way in the course of 2023. Thank you. Thank you, Rob. Thanks, Rob. We have another question. This comes from Stephen Volkmann from Jefferies. Stephen, your line is now open. Great. good morning, guys. Thank you. Good morning. My question was around pricing as well. I guess I'm just surprised at your two points kind of a forecast for 2023, because obviously you're coming off a fourth quarter that's way bigger than that. I think your chief competitor sort of said mid-single digits. Why wouldn't we think about sort of follow on pricing, you know, for actions done during the year in 2022? Why wouldn't that kind of have a stronger effect in 2023? I think, Rich, you even said something about another recent price increase. Are you seeing declines, I guess, is the other way to ask this, in certain parts of your customer base already? Is that sort of the offset? Just help us think through why that wouldn't be higher. Yeah, on the chief competitor comment, you know, I'm not sure where they would stand on going back to pandemic to current if they would be behind that and they're looking to play catch up on that or not. As I said, as you go back and add ours up, we're pretty close to neutral and the more than 2% would build on that modestly. Again, we'll see how the cost dynamic goes through the year just to how much of a build that is. We would expect the greater than 2% under any normal moderating improving cost scenario. You know, if costs go up, we'll probably expect that to go up a little bit more. I think we've got good coverage there and, you know, we feel good about the 2%. Where we have indexed pricing to steel or currency, there could be some giveback there happening. In total, as we show on our walks, our costs have not gone down in total. We need the 2%, and we'll get the 2% net of the any index clauses is the expectation. Yeah. Just maybe a clarification, Steve, the fourth quarter walk would also include, mix was favorable in the fourth quarter, so there would be favorable mix in there as well. As Rich said, we're targeting the two, looking to beat the 2% for the year and feel really good about the outlook for both, for price-cost, heading into 2023. Okay. It feels like you're gonna start the year, like, first quarter is gonna be significantly higher, I would think, just based on what we've seen recently. I guess that implies that we exit the year kind of flat or negative on price. Is that the way to think about it? Well, no, I think price will still be up in the fourth quarter. Yeah. We have been improving price sequentially for nine or 10 quarters. Every quarter, the year-over-year comp gets harder. As you highlight that our fourth quarter number was pretty sizable, so that becomes a challenging comp for us in the fourth quarter. We'd still expect it to be positive. To your point, the first quarter would be pretty good 'cause it's on a, you know, lower comp than what the fourth quarter just was. We just rolled some more sequential pricing in. Yeah. As we've said, you know, we've taken a conservative view on the second half for purposes of setting the, setting the guide. So, I mean, if we are in a more robust environment, which translates to a more robust cost environment, we have the ability to continue to move price as needed as we've shown over the last couple of years. So I think we do have those levers, if we need to pull them. It'll all depend on kind of where we're at in time and space as we enter the back half of the year. All right. I appreciate it. Thanks. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you, Stephen. With our next question comes from Bryan Blair from Oppenheimer. Bryan, your line is now open. Thank you. Good morning, guys. Good morning. Good morning. It's encouraging to see renewable energy transitioning back to growth mode. That, you know, certainly aligns with the market projections we've seen on the wind energy side, and particularly for offshore. Just curious in terms of the high single-digit plus growth outlook for the sector, how's your team thinking about relative growth rates on the wind and solar side? I'm assuming that your projections are gonna be, you know, back half-weighted for the year, again, specific to that space. How should we think about that cadence? On the split between wind and solar, for us, wind stronger. We've had more, we have more outgrowth package there. We've had more capital going into that space. Both markets good. And then there's also, you know, within solar, there's probably a little more. Well, there is a little more split between if fixed technology wins out over rotating technology, and then which technology wins as well in the solar channel. We have a different mix there, and depending on which growth rate is. Whereas with wind, we participate across that, a little higher in gear drive and direct drive, but we have good content across all of it. We're, we're more neutral on the technology side, and we have more self-help. We'd expect the growth rate to be higher on wind for the full year. You wanna talk about the cadence through the year? Yeah. I was gonna say, Bryan, I think the... You know, we've seen momentum build in renewable and wind in particular the last couple of quarters. We would expect to be at or could even be slightly above that rate in the first quarter, just given the comp we'd be working off of, as well as the momentum you know, we've seen the last couple of quarters kind of building into the first. Okay. Appreciate the color there. Can you provide an update on Spinea and GGB integration and offer a little more detail on sources and potentially the magnitude of ARB synergies? Sounds like there could be a little bit of heavy lifting to do there. If we, you know, combine Spinea and GGB, carryover with ARB, contribution, how much deal accretion do you have baked into the guidance? Understanding that Nadella for the time being is not factored in. Maybe I'll take them in reverse order. ARB, certainly some heavy lifting, but also again, family-owned business for several generations. you know, when you look at our scale, our U.S. manufacturing presence, our purchasing power, et cetera, et cetera, I think we're gonna be able to bring pretty quick synergies to that. That being said, going from the modest EBITDA margins that joins us to Process Industries type margins will, you know, certainly probably be more a 25 before we get up to that level. I would expect improvement, significant improvement in the run rate by the second half of this year and then another step up in next year before we would get to that. you know, a lot of synergies within that business for us. GGB, similar, it's been integrated into our bearing business. The early priority was standing up some of the carve-out from Enpro, and that's largely done. So, you know, we're operating largely without them and weaning ourselves off the transition service agreements there. So, really focused now on integrating that and with a lot, probably more emphasis so far on sales synergies than the operational side. But I think everything looks good there. You know, we have a good plan in place for that this year. Then Spinea, you know, pretty light synergy case for Spinea. That was really about entering a new product technology in a growing market. Certainly there are some synergies in selling our existing harmonic product along with their cycloidal product, but they are largely different technical solutions for different applications, and not an enormous amount of operational synergies there. All three exciting, and particularly since we didn't have Nadella in the guide at all, I'll let Phil clarify the accretion comment. Yeah. Specifically with ARB would have been in the guide that we provided, so that would be very, very modestly accretive just given the size. Nadella will add both to the revenue as well as all the way down after it closes. From an accretion standpoint, under the new definition, it would be, you know, likely, depending on timing, likely, you know, north of $0.05, somewhere between sort of $0.05-$0.10, somewhere around there. Okay. Appreciate it. Thanks again, guys. Thanks. Thank you, Bryan. With our next question comes from Michael Feniger from Bank of America. Michael, your line is now open. Hey, guys. I recognize you're taking a conservative approach to the outlook with the lack of visibility. Just on the pricing front, how much pricing just rolls into 2023 alone when we think of that 2% increase? Can you just remind us, in a typical year, when do we normally see price increases? I know it's different between the OE and the distribution. Last year was an abnormal year. What do we look like in a normal year, when we think of when we see these price increases? On a normal year, we would see our biggest sequential step up from Q4 to Q1. We've seen that in the abnormal years, the last couple of years as well, the biggest sequential improvement from Q4 to Q1. We've had this steady sequential growth from there. You know, I would expect a modest step up from Q4 to Q1, and then further sequential pricing and gains through the year like we've done the last couple of years. I think the difference this year could be if, you know, steel prices moderate, then, you know, there would be a little more netting, which again, we factored into that more than 2% outlook for the year. I think to the earlier question, comp lower because of the sequential in the first quarter. We'd expect pretty good price realization in the first quarter. Thank you. There's a fairly big acquisition in the Industrial Motion space for, you know, 13, 14 times EBITDA multiple, way above where you're trading today. How big is Industrial Motion of your portfolio right now? I know you just announced a few acquisitions. Is there any view to slow that down, integrate, and maybe shift more to repurchasing, given that valuation discount of what we're seeing out there in the market to where your shares are trading at? Tom, I mean, we did purchase 4% of the outstanding shares last year. We've been pretty active in the buyback market for the last seven or eight years. You know, I don't think the acquisitions that we've done would preclude us from doing that. But I would also say we don't think it's a either/or answer. The answer is probably both. We've been doing both. Yeah, just to answer the question, Mike, Industrial Motion would be roughly $1.4 billion in revenue. You know, well over $1 billion now, and we've targeted getting that to $2 billion. As Rich said, I think with our. You know, we like what those businesses are doing for our portfolio. You know, Rich showed the slide of our five-year performance. You know, that part of our portfolio has contributed significantly to that performance. You know, while there, while there's a big acquisition that's pending, there are still, we believe, ample acquisition opportunities out there for us to continue to move the needle. You know, I think you'll see us continue to advance on the M&A front, you know, with a disproportionate view toward, you know, Industrial Motion to continue to build that out, but still have the ability to buy back stock. You know, we've systematically done that. As I mentioned, you know, we allocated $900 million of capital across the board in 2022 and across all fronts, buyback, M&A, dividends, and CapEx, and we're in a great position to continue doing that as we move forward with our balance sheet in such strong condition. Great. I'll just sneak in one last question. You might have addressed this already. I know there's a lack of visibility right now. Have you observed anything in January or early February that would provide cause of concern, or conversely, signs of encouragement given some of the macro high-level data points we've seen out there? Thank you. Yeah. I think I commented on this in my statement. I mean, we're starting the year very strong. I think in general, the environment that we're operating in here in the first week of February is a very positive one. Right. Thank you. Thanks, Mike. Thank you. With our next question comes from Dylan Cummings from Goldman Sachs. Dylan, your line is now open. Great. Good morning. Thanks for the question. Just wanted to ask quickly on the APAC revenue growth in the quarter, another sequential acceleration in the rate of growth, probably skews a bit, I think, but more, you know, positive versus some of the other industrial reads we've gotten from the channel around China over the last quarter or so. Can you just talk about how much of the growth there right now is being driven by renewables versus any other kind of growth you might be seeing across the rest of your end market mix? Yeah. Certainly our Asia business has become pretty significant mix to renewable energy. Our outlook there, you know, I think would continue to give us a more positive outlook as well as more positive results than peers with a more diversified market mix or a more industrial market mix. Yeah, I would say, Dylan, when you look at the quarter, I mean, it was. You know, we were up 19%. It was broad. I mean, you know, China was up high teens, India up high teens, the rest of Asia up in that, in that range. As Rich said, renewable was by far the largest growth sector, but distribution was right behind it, as we continue to see, you know, positive performance across distribution as well as other sectors. It's been broad growth, but there's no question, particularly China, it has been very renewables. You know, at least that's been the biggest driver the last few quarters. Okay. Yeah. That's great color. Thank you. I'd add the India results, and outlook. The outlook for India is pretty strong in 2023. Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. Maybe just one last one on the housekeeping side with regards to the currency impacts. You called that out as a headwind, I think, to your margin bridge for next year. I know it was still negative in the fourth quarter, but you did talk about, you know, some more challenging comps from that perspective as well. Can you just talk about how impactful currency might have been either as a tailwind or a headwind to margins in 2022, and then what you're kind of baking in as a headwind for 2023? Yeah. I would just say, Dylan, you know, in 2022 with the movements in the currencies, we and, you know, on the transaction side, we had some transaction favorability in 2022, which was actually, you know, was a margin tailwind, actually helped our margins in 2022. Really the non-recurrence of that, of those positive gains in 2022 kind of not repeating in 2023, coupled with the continued headwind on the top line is going to produce, you know, a year-over-year pretty significant headwind to margins just by the, you know, the flip of that, if you will, from one year to the next. That's sort of baked into the guide. Really just talking, taking a, maybe a bigger step back, you know, you know, the guide sort of implies, 20%-ish all in incrementals and that currency being a big headwind. As you know, M&A comes in at really an EBITDA margin. When you back it out, our organic incrementals with the pricing and the operational execution, cost moderating, I mean, the organic incremental implied in the guide would be much closer to 30% versus 20, and I think that speaks to a lot of the work we've been doing the last year plus, in getting the price-cost moving in our favor. Very helpful. Thank you, Phil. Thanks, Dylan. Thanks. Thank you, Dylan. With our next question comes from Joe Ritchie from Goldman Sachs. Joe, your line is now open. Thank you. Good morning, guys. Good morning. Hey, Joe. My first question, just a clarification question. You're starting off the year with high single digit growth, but then kind of the midpoint of your guidance is at 3%. I mean, it sounds like you're expecting the second half to turn negative. I just wanna be clear that that is kind of like the expectation into your guide for the second half of the year. Well, I'd say we're probably starting off the year closer to the, you know, the high single digits. We're probably starting off the year at the higher end of our guide. I'd start there. The, you know, the year's off to a strong start. Yeah, to go up high single digits, and you know, we're not expecting anything that would, that's coming off of 10. If you go from 10 to 7.5 would be the low end of high single digits or eight or nine. You know, to get down to the fourth quarter, you probably gotta be, you know, down to a zero to one sort of number to come to the midpoint of the guidance. I would say we're also, as I said, you know, starting the year pretty strong and probably starting more towards the higher end of the guidance. Yeah. Yeah. I would say, Joe, we like to think of it as saying the back half, The outlook sort of implies a flattening out in the back half of the year as opposed to a decline. As we said, we don't have great visibility beyond the second quarter. We have to see how things develop over the next couple of months, how the order book fills in, and then we'll be able to kind of assess how accurate that is as we move through the year. Yeah, that's helpful. I know you guys are, you know, a fairly short cycle business. But, you know, because of supply chain issues, some companies have had a little bit more visibility, I guess, at the start of the year than they normally would. I'd love to hear maybe some comments around whether your visibility is a little bit higher than normal today. Also, you know, Rich, if I just kinda ask you a broader question, like, what concerns you? What's your biggest concern around the year? I'd love to hear your thoughts on that as well. Yeah. Well, you know, where we have I would say we have significantly greater visibility than what we normally would. I think the supply chain issues have reduced significantly. They're still there. I mean, everybody had problems operating in China in the fourth quarter as an example, and there's other issues out there. Our backlog organically, if you adjust for the acquisitions and divestitures, is up modestly from where it was a year ago. And our run rate of shipping is up again, high single digits from where it was a year ago. Our backlog also peaked in around the middle of last year, so we have been liquidating backlog modestly. I would say, you know, we have very good visibility out for the next three or four months, and the demand picture looks quite good. In our geographic walk, we show that, you know, Europe was down modestly, as Phil mentioned. If you adjust for Russia, it was up a little bit, but that would include price. If you know, Europe from a volume basis in the fourth quarter was down, so that would be really the only geographic area that's soft. You know, to come back and answer your last question, we wanna feel really good about the position we're in. I think we're going to, you know, again, get off to a really good start. The midpoint of the guide is based again on, I think, a pretty cautious softening in the second half. Even that's a good result, and we're in an excellent position that if, you know, we're being too cautious on it, we'll capitalize on that. You know, predicting these industrial markets and inflections is not an easy task. You know, focus on where we have the visibility and then really focus on, you know, growing the earnings power and the revenue of the company through the cycle, and I feel great about that. I think we're in a really good position. Yeah. Maybe one other point, Joe. When you look at the backlog all in, I mean, we're actually higher. We ended the year higher than the end of 2021, so we're sitting here with a stronger backlog than we had a year ago. I think that bodes well at least for the near term visibility. Great. Thanks, guys. Thanks, Joe. Thank you, Joe. With our next question comes from Chris Dankert from Loop Capital. Chris, your line is now open. Hey. Morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. I guess first off, you know, Phil, you'd mentioned, we were talking about, you know, the margins in 23 calling for flattish now. I think on the last call, we were kinda hoping to be able to nudge that a bit higher in 23. The moving parts there, I mean, you called out, you know, higher labor, other materials, et cetera. Really, are there any investment costs to keep in mind in that margin guide that they're stepping up in the new year? Again, I assume for the most part, these labor rates and FX, if anything, have kind of improved versus fourth quarter, no? Yeah. I mean, it's a great question, Chris. I mean, as I think about, you know, we're always investing, but I would say, you know, year-over-year, there's probably not a sizable headwind there. As you think about some of the... You know, put the currency aside 'cause that will be a year-over-year negative. I mean, you'll see that in the walks as we move through the year. When we talk about SG&A, we're gonna have normal, you know, labor increases and, you know, spending to support the higher levels. We actually, for example, we're gonna have higher, you know, pension expense just with the change in the discount rate and the like. You know, things like that. Talked a little bit about the mix with the OEM versus distribution. On the manufacturing line, still seeing, you know, some inflation there, you know, whether it's labor. Should see better operational execution. The other dynamic that's happening there is around, you know, a lot of the inflation we got hit with in 2022 is working its way through the inventory. I think that'll be a cost that's gonna come through in 2023. Frankly, earlier in the year, we thought we might see some of it come through in 2022, but we're planning on it now to come through in 2023. That'll be a not a permanent headwind, but that'll certainly be at least a temporary headwind while it comes through. Those are, those are the main drivers kinda offsetting the, you know, the positive price we expect to get, the material and logistics being down, and then the other self-help and other initiatives, you know, in addition to the modest volume kinda propping us up. As I said, organically would expect strong incrementals, you know, closer to 30 than 20. It's just the combination of the, you know, the currency and the M&A that are just depressing it a little bit. Gotcha. That, that's super helpful. Then just kind of moving to Process. Again, everything kind of outside of alt energy flattish. I guess within that kind of other bucket, you know, automation has been kind of a standout for... Maybe any comments on automation, kind of how that fits into Process growth in the new year? Yeah. Automation, I mean, I think that's a market we still see good growth. Rich talked about Spinea and talked about some of the other initiatives, you know, going on there. I mean, that is a market that, you know, we would expect to grow. It's kind of inside the general industrial category that we have on the charts as well. There's a lot in general industrial, the, you know, the automation piece, particularly, you know, factory automation, you know, we expect to continue to see strong growth, strong trends, and that'll be both an organic and inorganic opportunity for us as we move forward. Gotcha. Well, thanks so much, and best of luck in the new year, guys. Thanks, Chris. Thank you, Chris. There are no remain question at this time. Do you have any final comments or remarks? Yeah. Thanks, Glenn, and thank you everyone for joining us today. If you have any further questions after today's call, please contact me. Thank you. This concludes our call. Thank you for participating in today's Timken's fourth quarter earnings release conference call. You may now disconnect.