Tutor Perini Corporation second quarter 2023 earnings conference call. My name is Doug, and I will be your coordinator for today. All participants are currently in a listen-only mode. Following management's prepared remarks, we will be opening the call for a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. Please press star zero on your telephone keypad. I will now turn the conference over to your host for today, Mr. Jorge Casado, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed. Hello, everyone, and thank you for your participation today. With us on the call are Ronald Tutor, Chairman and CEO, and Gary Smalley, Executive Vice President and CFO. Before we discuss our results, I will remind everyone that during this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are based on management's current assessment of existing trends and information. There is an inherent risk that our actual results could differ materially. You can find our disclosures about risk factors that could potentially contribute to such differences in our Form 10-Q, which we will be filing tomorrow, and in our most recent Form 10-K, which we filed on March 15th, 2023. The company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements, whether due to new information, future events, or otherwise, other than as required by law. Thank you, and I will now turn the call over to Ronald Tutor. Thanks, Jorge. Good day. Thank you all for joining us. Our secondly, year-over-year decline is attributable to COVID, and we believe our revenue has reached an inflection point now that our business is beginning to normalize, and we are beyond most major COVID impacts. As we have discussed in the past, COVID temporarily halted major bids and awards of backlog. Large civil projects were in the range of 2+ years and prevented the award of four large projects valued at almost $11 billion, which we had been the lower preferred bidder. Most of these projects that were not awarded us, if not all of them, are now expected to be rebid in 2024 and in the first half of 2025, so we will have another opportunity to capture the same contracts. We will, we believe we will continue to see modest revenue growth over the remainder of this year, with higher growth expected next year, and much stronger in 2025, as we should be entering the construction phase of multiple large projects beginning in mid-2024. Our second quarter operating cash flow was a solid $56 million, bringing our operating cash flow for the first six months of 2023 to $78 million, the second highest results for the 6 months of any year since the merger of Tutor-Saliba and Perini Corporation in 2008. We remain confident that our cash generation in the second half of this year will be even stronger, as we expect to resolve various long-standing disputes, be it either by negotiation or litigation. Of dispute resolutions this year, our cash generation could be much stronger. We plan to use this anticipated cash to reduce our debt and position ourselves favorably for a refinancing early next year. Our second quarter backlog increased to $10.9 billion, up 27%, compared to $8.5 billion for the same quarter last year. The strong backlog growth was driven by the large award of the $3 billion Brooklyn Jail design-build project, which includes more than expected to be performed by our specialty contractor segment. We also booked nearly $1 billion of other new awards and contract adjustments, including Tinian International Airport project in the Northern Mariana Islands, and $102 million of additional funding at a Rudolph and Sletten healthcare project in California. From an earnings perspective, we had a very strong performance and contributions in the second quarter from our civil segment, but experienced some continuous challenges, particularly in our specialty contractors group, which Gary will address further in a moment. Overall, we reported a consolidated pre-tax loss of seven testing for non-controlling interests. We continue to have a full bidding pipeline with numerous large project opportunities across various locations, including Guam and the Western Pacific. Some of our more significant opportunities include the estimated $3 billion Queens facility, on a decision of which will be made in January with all proposals in. The owner has indicated that as a timeline for award. In October, we will be busy bidding on numerous projects, including the 1+ billion dollar Frederick Tunnel, Frederick Douglass Tunnel in Maryland, as well as the $500 million Fulton Line Communications train control projects in New York and the $500 million Amtrak Connecticut River Bridge, Bridge Replacement. We also expect a decision in the fourth quarter on Frontier-Kemper's proposal for the $500 million Great Lakes Tunnel. Other larger near-term opportunities include the $1.5 billion Inglewood People Mover project in Southern California, and the $500 million Amtrak East River Tunnel rehab in New York. Both bidding later this year. Expected to bid in the first quarter of 2024, which I'd remind you all, we were low bidder two years ago on that project. We anticipate that once again, we will capture a significant share of these projects and continue to grow our backlog substantially over the next 12 to 18 months, providing that foundation for significant future revenue growth and improved profitability. Recent data supports our projections that the U.S. economy continues to be strong and resilient, despite the effects of inflation and higher interest rates, particularly in the area of public works, with diminishing concerns about the threats of a recession. Some of this strength can be attributed to funding toward investments in infrastructure by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Demand for our services remains extremely strong and is expected to increase as substantial funding flows to our public owners over the next period of years. I will reiterate that we are focused on successfully growing our civil business, which will continue to be the driver of our future growth and profitability. Based on our year-to-date financial results, combined with various uncertainties in the second half of the year, we have decided to not provide new guidance for 2023. Various risks exist, both with respect to dispute resolution negotiations and the result of major litigation decisions, which are in play to conclude in the fourth quarter. There is also a wide range of potential outcomes related to our effective income tax rate that give us cause to pause. There are several additional positive events that could transpire later this year, which could offset, to some degree, any negative that might occur. Needless to say, we don't feel it appropriate to make a statement for the balance of the year. Thank you, with that, I will turn the call over to Gary to review the financial results. Thank you, Ron, and good afternoon, everyone. I will start by discussing our results for the second quarter, including cash flow, followed by some comments on our balance sheet, as well as some modeling assumptions. As Ron mentioned, we generated a solid $56 million of operating cash in the second quarter of 2023, and $78 million in the first six months of 2023, which is the second-best result for the first six months of any year since the 2008 merger, and only behind last year's operating cash performance for the equivalent period. Our operating cash was again driven by strong collection activities, including collections associated with certain settlement negotiations that concluded in the past few quarters. We remain confident that we will deliver stronger operating cash flow for 2023 compared to 2022, due to projected cash collections, both from project execution activities and the resolution of various other outstanding disputes. Revenue for the second quarter of 2023 was just over $1 billion, up 19% compared to the same period in 2022, with the increase driven by contributions from certain civil segment mass transit projects in California. Civil segment revenue for the second quarter was $554 million, up a strong 37% compared to the second quarter of last year, due to the mass transit projects I just mentioned. Building segment revenue was $331 million, up 24%, and specialty contractor segment revenue was $136 million, down 28% year-over-year. The revenue increase for the building segment was primarily due to increased project execution activities on certain projects in California, the Northeast, Oklahoma, and Florida, partially offset by reduced project execution activities on certain other projects in Arkansas and California that are nearing completion. The decrease for the specialty contractor segment was principally due to reduced project execution activities on the electrical component of a transportation project in the Northeast that is nearing completion, as well as unfavorable non-cash adjustments due to changes in estimates on that same project associated with the change in the expected recovery on certain unapproved change requests, and an adverse legal ruling on an educational facilities project in New York, both of which were partially offset by positive contributions from a technology facility project in Arizona. Overall, we reported $2 million of income from construction operations for the second quarter of 2023, compared to a loss from construction operations of $91 million for the same quarter of last year. Our second quarter results for this year were dominated by very strong profit contributions from the Civil segment, which delivered $105 million of income from construction operations and a strong segment operating margin of 19%. This quarter's strong Civil segment performance was due to solid contributions from the previously mentioned mass transit projects in California, including favorable adjustments of $58 million on one of those projects based on improved performance. The Building segment, however, despite posting good revenue growth for the second quarter, posted a loss of $14 million for the quarter, primarily due to unfavorable adjustments on certain projects in the Northeast, California, and Florida that were immaterial individually, but totaled about $16 million in the aggregate. The Specialty Contractor segment posted a loss from construction operations of $70 million in the second quarter. That was largely attributable to unfavorable non-cash adjustments of $36 million due, as I just mentioned, to changes in estimates on the electrical and mechanical scope of the transportation project in the Northeast that were associated with the change in the expected recovery on certain unapproved change requests, as well as a non-cash charge of $25 million on the educational facilities project in New York that resulted from an adverse court ruling for a no-damages-for-delay clause. Corporate G&A expense for the second quarter of 2023 was $19 million, compared to $14 million for the same quarter of last year. Other income for the second quarter of 2023 was $3 million, compared to $1 million in the second quarter of 2022. Interest expense was $22 million, compared to $16 million for the same quarter of last year, with the increase driven by higher borrowing rates this year on our Term Loan B and Revolver. We had a slight income tax expense of $194,000 for the quarter, with an associated effective tax rate of a negative 1.2%, compared to an income tax benefit of $44 million in the second quarter of last year, and an effective tax rate of 41.3%, which resulted from our pre-tax loss of $106 million in the prior year period. Our effective tax rate for each quarter depends on the pre-tax results that are forecasted for the full year. When we forecast a pre-tax loss, tax benefits that would normally reduce the effective tax rate when we report profits, instead increase the rate. Also, the impact of tax benefits is magnified when the benefits are disproportionately large compared to the pre-tax income or loss for the year. In cases where forecasted pre-tax losses decrease as the year progresses, volatility occurs because we have to true up the tax expense or benefit for the year, or for the period that we're reporting, to align with the expected annual tax provision. As we continue through this year, you may see higher or lower rates than normal, increased volatility in the rates from quarter to quarter. Net loss attributable to Tutor Perini for the second quarter of 2023 was $38 million, or a loss of $0.72 per share, compared to a net loss attributable to Tutor Perini of $63 million, or a loss of $1.23 per share in the second quarter of 2022. The smaller loss was due to the various factors mentioned earlier that drove our income from construction operations in the current second quarter, again, primarily in the Civil group. As for our balance sheet, our net debt as of June 30th, 2023, was $663 million, down $36 million or 5% compared to our net debt as of December 31st, 2022. As of June 30th, 2023, we're in compliance with the covenants under our credit agreement. We expect to continue to be in compliance in the future. Our first lien net leverage ratio for the second quarter of 2023 was 2.23 to 1, well within the limit for the quarter of 3 to 1. As a reminder, the leverage ratio will step down to 2.5 to 1 for the third quarter of this year and 2.25 to 1 for each quarter thereafter. Debt reduction remains our primary near-term focus for the use of cash. We still expect even more significant cash collections in the second half of this year, much of it associated with anticipated resolutions of various disputes. The timing and magnitude of excess cash generation over the remainder of this year will determine when and by how much we will continue to re- reduce our debt. We continue to be very mindful of our debt maturities and the springing maturity provision of our Term Loan B and Revolver in January 2025. We remain confident that we will be able to refinance as needed by early next year. Finally, I will update you on some assumptions for modeling purposes. G&A expense for 2023 is now expected to be between $245 million-$255 million. Depreciation and amortization is still anticipated to be approximately $47 million in 2023, with the depreciation of $45 million and amortization of $2 million. Interest expense is now expected to be approximately $84 million, of which about $4 million will be non-cash. Our effective income tax rate for 2023 is now expected to be approximately 40%-50%, compared to the 50% I indicated last quarter. We now expect non-controlling interests to be between $45 million and $50 million, and we continue to forecast 52 million weighted average diluted shares outstanding for 2023. Lastly, capital expenditures are now expected to be approximately $45 million-$50 million, most of which is project-related. Thank you. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Ron. Thanks, Gary. To recap, we had strong revenue growth in the second quarter, driven by contributions from certain civil mass transit projects in California. As I previously stated, our backlog grew to $10.9 billion in the second quarter, up 27%. We once again generated solid cash of $56 million from operations and $78 million to date. I repeat, continue or anticipate much stronger at the balance of the year. As we resolve the disputed matters at hand and the litigation and process that will conclude this year. Our bidding pipeline, as we've said over and over, continues to grow with a significant amount of major work and very limited at best, competition. We anticipate delivering significantly improved earnings. Let me change that. I read... We anticipate delivering improved earnings over the second half of this year without question, and significantly improved financial results next year and beyond, as we conclude and resolve all these long duration disputes and litigations, and they're brought to an end, and we collect the capital we've been owed for so long. We expect strong, sustained profit contributions from the various large ongoing civil projects that continue to contribute to our earnings, and will continue over the next several years. I would also add that our civil segment delivered very strong profit in the second quarter. Unfortunately, it was largely offset by continuous losses in our specialty contractors segment and to a lesser extent, our building group. With that, I'll turn the call over to the operator for questions. Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we'll be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, you may press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star key. Our first question comes from the line of Alex Rygiel with B. Riley Securities. Please proceed with your question. Thank you. Good evening, gentlemen. A couple quick questions here. Were any of the recent awards funded by the IRA or other kind of recent federal funding initiatives? If not, do you see this money starting to work its way into the market yet? Well, this is Ron. No, the Brooklyn Prisons is funded in New York as a part of the federal judges dictating that Rikers be replaced, and that's all state and city funds. Frankly, we hear about the infrastructure bill. We're convinced they're funding. They've been more funding direct to owners on financing, drawing, and getting things out, but we don't think a significant commitment of funds has yet hit the market. We're in contact with three or four of our major billion-dollar+ civil jobs that appear to be getting funding and will hit the marketplace for us to propose on in first and second quarter next year. It's having an effect. It's just been very slow happening. That's helpful. Then, Ron, obviously, this has been a tough year as it relates to kind of reported earnings with a lot of the dispute settlements. You've mentioned that, you know, you're hopeful this concludes. Any way to kind of bracket your mind, sort of... Are you hoping that it concludes in 2024, or could it slip into 2025? No, I don't think there'll be any litigation or claims that go into 2025. If there are, they'll be small to a point that won't affect anything. 2023 and 2024, good or bad, is collecting money, settling these long-standing claims and disputes that stood still for three years during COVID. Every one of which has court dates, mediations, and we're trying cases and litigating them through verdicts. That's just what it's going to take place through the end of next year, where I expect that 90% of all of our CIE will be adjudicated one way or the other. I expect us to win and collect most of our money. Yeah, Ron, if I could add this. Thank you. Hi, Alex. Hey, just to want to remind everyone that, you know, our history isn't to always take write-downs when we litigate and arbitrate these things. We, we've got a history, and perhaps not in the recent months, not what we've reported, but we do have a history of prevailing quite favorably a lot of the time. We're looking forward to some of the positions that are coming up that are being litigated, arbitrated. We look forward to not just having negative results, but positive results. In fact, we've had that in the last- You're absolutely right, Gary. Several quarters. If I said something to the contrary, that isn't what I meant to infer. No. because we have still won many litigations in excess of what we booked. The only place we don't is when we elect to settle to get the cash and avoid the litigation. Other words, we're trying a number of cases, and our history has been successful. Yeah, Ron, it was nothing you said. I just want to make sure that it was understood based on the question, but. Got you. Yeah, and we've even had some positive outcomes in, in the last year or so, but they've just been masked by larger negative results. anyway. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steven Fisher with UBS. Please proceed with your question. Thanks. Good afternoon. Hey, Steve. Hi. Can you just give us a sense of how much is being adjudicated in the second half of the year? I guess maybe putting it in terms of what's the amount of the claims you have on the books that are to be adjudicated? I think, Ron, you just said 90% of CIE, you know, before this is all over, but how much in the second half of this year do you think you'll be adjudicating? Ron, probably better- Say 100. Yeah, probably better- Right ... talk in aggregate, right? Well, that's what I was gonna do. I'd say just quickly in my mind, adding up what should resolve, I'd say in the neighborhood of $200 million more. Okay, that's helpful. I, I think last quarter, you had expected to reinstate the guidance this quarter. I guess I'm just curious, kind of, what the uncertainties are for the rest of the year, but curious, just what kind of changed your mind, you know, versus three months ago? We have a lawsuit that tries for well over $100 million in a three-panel arbitration. Although I believe we will win, the swing could be such to try to predict that lawsuit, even as optimistic as I am, we've discussed and decided it would be inappropriate. The results will be in November. There's nothing else that compares to it going forward into the following year. Yeah, if I could- Okay. If I could add this, Steven, also, you know, in, in my remarks, I was talking about the, the tax rate, and that's a big part of. It, it's just so hard for us to, to know what that tax rate is going to be or what the impact will be, because, you know, with, with, with our tax rate based on what it is on a, on a forecast for the year, as we whittle down the, the loss that we have, you know, for the first half of the year, then the impact on the, on the tax rate is, is magnified because that loss shrinks. You know, if you follow, you know, it's, it's math. You know, so it just makes it more volatile, more difficult. we'd have a better chance of, of predicting, let's say, a consolidated pre-tax income, but to give an EPS range, there's so much volatility with the tax rate that besides what Ron mentioned, it just makes it almost impossible for us to really feel comfortable with an estimate. Okay. Thanks, Gary. Then, have you had discussions with lending groups to get a sense of how much cash you need to collect in order to put yourself in a position to be able to kind of reasonably refinance the debt over in the early part of next year? Yeah. Ron, okay, I'll take this one. Yeah. Yeah, so yeah. Steve, we've, we've talked to, to various groups and, you know, the short answer is the more, the better, but there's not really a minimum that we've heard. It's really a function of, you know, certainly we need to have improved performance. Cash flow generation is a positive. Also, what the pricing for our bonds, you know, what they're trading at. Right now, they're at 86. That's significantly improved from what they were a quarter ago. If we continue to see improvement there, then that certainly is a bright sign. Getting down our, our, you know, our leverage, was a big part. We made some progress in that. We, you know, we believe based on, you know, the advice that we're getting, if we continue to do what we're doing, maybe a little better on the earnings side, of course, you know, for the rest of the year, we think we're going to be well-positioned. Then certainly with the, with the outstanding litigation that, that Ron mentioned, litigation, arbitration, and also some of the other cash that we expect to, to come in, for, for settlement activity, that should give us, another bump that should be helpful. Okay. It sounds like, you know, the environment is such that there are going to be plenty of things to bid on, particularly in the, the civil construction area. I guess I'm just curious, can you talk about your surety capacity at this point? You know, what's, what's the status of that? Has that been affected at all by sort of leverage and, and cash collections and, you know, some of the, the, the legal settlements? What, what's your surety bond capacity, and, and where does that, that stand at the moment? We have a very significant capacity because unlike the public markets, the sureties look at our basic equity net worth, which exceeds $1.2 billion, our cash flows, which are positive and continuing to get better, and our performance in the major civil work, which is what we're pursuing. As disappointing as these collections have been in the disputes and the write-downs, and I might add predominantly in New York, which is a very, to be very kind, a very challenging place to work, the sureties are 100% in support. At least as we speak, they continue to be supportive as we pursue this major work, because irregardless of the write-downs and the lack of earnings, we have a very substantial net worth, which is what we all look to from a surety and a capacity standpoint. everything's fine, but it doesn't mean we have simply got to get out from under these CIEs and back to the norm, whatever it takes. Okay, and then just lastly, on the specialty business, obviously, lots of moving parts in there. I wonder if you could just give us a sense of what the underlying performance of that business is, and if you have any plans to, to do anything differently there? From, 'cause from the outside, it's hard to see that it's moving in the right direction, but maybe you can just help us with what's going into the backlog and how and when that might be, might flow through to give us a sense that, you know, this is a business that still makes sense to, to pursue. Let me, let me clarify the specialty business so you don't throw in the good with the bad. We have an operation called Fisk Electric, which operates in Fisk of Texas and Fisk of California, two separate entities in that specialty group, that year after year, make money and never lose. We have a mechanical company in South Florida called Nagelbush Mechanical that never loses. Our problem in the specialty group isn't the entire group. It's the mechanical and electrical operation in New York City, which has generated half of our CIE, and most of the big losses you see with respect to the reference to the specialty group, goes there. New York is an incredibly difficult place to work, with a legal system that essentially protects public agencies and is very difficult and challenging for contractors. However, our performance and those of most of our peers in New York have created a decision in that abysmal state. There's nobody left that can bid big work, and as a result, they don't. We've reached a point to where as one of only maybe two players in town that can do a major job, we're increasing our prices and demanding contract changes, which we have forced through. Our specialty group in New York, where all of these problems have emanated, have been reduced to a fraction of their size, and at least for the time being in the near future, are only bidding in support of our civil group and not allowed to do any business with any other contractors, developers, or agencies direct. Let's just say their revenue is probably 25% of what it was four years ago, and in the interim, they will continue to function only to support us under our control. To put it bluntly, they've been reduced dramatically, and we're in hopes of cleaning out all of the negative work, getting all these issues resolved, and then if they grow back up, it'll only be on the basis of their performance, which so far at best has been challenging. Thank you very much, Ron. There are no further questions in the queue. I'd like to hand the call back to Mr. Tutor for closing remarks. Thank you, everybody. bearing with us, we'll turn this miserable corner. I look forward to the next call. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.