Greetings. Welcome to The Trade Desk second quarter 2023 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Chris Toth. Please proceed. Thank you, operator. Hello, and good afternoon to everyone. Welcome to The Trade Desk second quarter 2023 earnings conference call. On the call today are Founder and CEO, Jeff Green, and Chief Financial Officer, Laura Schenkein. A copy of our earnings press release can be found on our website at thetradedesk.com in the Investor Relations section. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that except for historical information, some of the discussion and our responses in Q&A may contain forward-looking statements, which are dependent upon certain risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements represent our belief and assumptions only as of the date such statements are made. Actual results may vary significantly, and we expressly assume no obligations to update any of our forward-looking statements. Should any of our beliefs or assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual financial results could differ materially from our projections or those implied by these forward-looking statements. I encourage you to refer to the risk factors referenced in our press release and included in our most recent SEC filings. In addition to reporting our GAAP financial results, we present supplemental non-GAAP financial data. A reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP measures can be found on our earnings press release. We believe that providing non-GAAP measures, combined with our GAAP results, provide a more meaningful representation of the company's operational performance. With that, I will now turn the call over to founder and CEO, Jeff Green. Jeff? Thanks, Chris, and thank you all for joining us today. As you've seen from our press release, we posted very strong growth in the second quarter. We reported revenue of $464 million, growing 23% compared with last year. This also represents an acceleration in our growth rate compared with the first quarter. Just like the last few quarters, we continue to significantly outperform the digital advertising industry. What's particularly notable about our performance is that most advertisers are still dealing with some degree of uncertainty in their business. Even though certain macro indicators are improving, there's still a sense from many advertisers that we are in an unpredictable environment. For them, it's hard to dismiss what we've been through over the last 2-3 years with a global pandemic, rampant inflation, supply chain crises, and banking system uncertainty, and of course, global rebalancing. None of these market dynamics have been very predictable the last few years. This year, like the last few, has similarly had lots of never-before macro events. While many indicators and advertiser sentiments are improving, there's also a sense that it's more difficult than ever to predict what's coming next. In this environment, marketers have learned that data-driven precision can bring a sense of certainty and reliability to their advertising efforts. Because of the innovations we've brought to market in areas such as retail media, CTV, identity, and data, advertisers have a clearer sense than ever of the performance and impact of their ad campaigns. With Kokai, we are delivering even more innovation, all in service of helping advertisers drive precision, relevance, and certainty in everything they do. As a result, we are winning more business with both new and existing customers. We are signing more multi-year Joint Business Plans, or JBPs, with leading agencies and brands representing spend projections in future years well into the billions of dollars. Our relative outperformance over the last few quarters means we have gained more market share than in any other period in our company's history. Advertisers have become more deliberate with their spend and have increasingly gravitated to our platform. As they understand more about the power of programmatic, they are choosing the objectivity and performance of our platform over the murkiness of walled gardens more than ever before. Even as we continue to grow and scale around the world, we see no deviation from our 95%+ retention rate. Our clients rely on us more and more. I was at the Cannes Advertising Festival a few weeks ago, and I could have filled my calendar several times over with brand CMOs, agency leaders, and CEOs of our key partners, all of whom want to understand how we can work more closely together. Every year, demand for the value that we deliver continues to grow. Perhaps what's most interesting right now is how marketers are seeking a sense of certainty in an uncertain environment. Much of the product rollouts and partnership growth we've seen this year is because we're giving our clients certainty and reliability that they can't get elsewhere. This shows up all over our client base and all over our platform, but I'd like to talk today about a few places where this certainty and reliability is really driving our relative outperformance, particularly in retail media, CTV, and identity. By discussing these three, I believe it will provide some insight as to why we continue to outperform the market, why I believe we'll continue to outperform the market, and why we continue to invest in our platform with all the innovations coming from Kokai. First, let me talk about retail media, which has become one of the fastest-growing areas of our business. Much like CTV, our rapid growth in retail media starts with our focus on objectivity. Retailers know we're only here to serve advertisers and to drive more precision and efficacy in ad campaigns. We don't compete with them, and like all of our partners, retailers know we are careful and objective stewards of their data. As you know, Walmart was one of the first early major retailers to understand the power of their data and to help advertisers understand and measure the connection between campaign spend and actual consumer purchases. For many advertisers, there's no clearer measurement of performance than that. You can look at all kinds of traditional marketing KPIs, but there's nothing more powerful than knowing that a consumer bought your product because of the ad you served, and then using that data to improve marketing spend in the future. One of the great recent examples of this is Fruit of the Loom. Working with their agency, GSD&M, Fruit of the Loom wanted to reach new and existing customers to increase sales with a back-to-school promotion. They were targeting a 200% return on ad spend or ROAS. Working with the Walmart DSP and The Trade Desk, they were able to predict audiences with much more precision and were able to understand in real time how ads in different channels were performing. They could shift campaign $ to those channels that were actually driving consumer purchases. This clear line of sight helped Fruit of the Loom vastly exceed their campaign goals, delivering a 1,200% return on ad spend among existing customers and more than 1,000% ROAS with new customers. Eric Mahoney is Fruit of the Loom's digital marketing manager. He said, and I quote, "Historically, we've done a really good job of reaching our brand purchasers, but working with the Walmart DSP allowed us to reach that new consumer through predictive audience segments. We could not have achieved these results without Walmart DSP and The Trade Desk." He also said that working with The Trade Desk is like putting on a fresh pair of underwear. Of all the accolades we've received over the years, that is definitely one of my favorites ever. The gravitational pull of retail media is not limited to the U.S. Retailers around the world are working with The Trade Desk in different ways to unleash the power of their data to help advertisers bring more value to their campaigns. In Singapore, we partner with FairPrice, the largest grocery chain there, with 570 stores serving 90% of the country's population. One of the first brands to leverage FairPrice shopper data on our platform was Coca-Cola, who wanted to reach customers during the festive Lunar New Year season. They also wanted to be able to measure the performance of low-funnel marketing outreach across multiple channels, including OTT, audio, digital out of home, and of course, open internet display. The campaign tapped into FairPrice's audience segments via our platform, targeting FairPrice customers who had purchased Coke or other Coke products over the past 1-3 months. They were able to target seasonal shoppers who purchased festive products and optimize in real time to the news and lifestyle channels that delivered the best results. With their agency, EssenceMediacom, Coke was able to drive 189% uplift in sales during the campaign. They were also able to measure consumer reaction in a range of new ways, including the time it takes for a consumer to buy a product following different kinds of ad exposures, audience engagement from different channels, and cart values of first-time and repeat buyers. The retail media opportunity is also growing exponentially for us in Europe. In recent quarters, we've talked about our partnerships with leading retailers such as Ocado and Tesco, and just a few weeks ago, we announced a partnership with Europe's largest retail group, Schwarz, which includes major brands such as Kaufland and Lidl. From an advertising perspective, retail media is something that's really taken off over the last two years. It's no coincidence that the growing interest in retail media coincides with growing advertiser focus on authenticated ad environments. With retail media, advertisers can start with precise, authenticated data, whether that data is based on purchase history or loyalty data. From there, the advertiser can target based on what they know and then do more accurate data-driven modeling to expand targeting segments with greater precision. Some of the same dynamics are behind the rapid growth of CTV advertising. As we have all seen in recent weeks, there is a ton of focus right now on the business model of TV. What is the future of the linear TV model, and how does the TV industry create sustainable, profitable business models for streaming TV as viewers shift there in mass? I believe the answer will come in fully exploring the authenticated viewer data that sits at the core of the CTV ecosystem, which is something that today's leading media companies are exploring. For the past couple of years, CTV has been one of our fastest-growing channels at scale. There are a range of reasons for that. Fundamentally, video remains the most effective way for brands to influence the hearts and minds of consumers. With CTV, brands can apply data to their TV campaigns and measure with much more precision the effectiveness of every ad dollar. Much like retail, advertisers value the authenticated audiences that come with CTV. Pretty much every streaming TV viewer is logged in with an email address. For advertisers, this means more certainty. It also creates a new starting point centered on data. These dual forces of retail and CTV are truly bringing the power of data-driven decisioning home for advertisers, and it is accelerating their shift to programmatic on our platform. Whereas in the early years of programmatic, we were looking to find ways to affix data to campaigns, today, we use data as a starting point for campaigns. Instead of hunting for ad opportunities with data, The Trade Desk and marketers are starting with data to know which media opportunities we should hunt for. It's a different dynamic, and it's one that's become more prominent as advertisers seek more certainty in an uncertain and unpredictable environment. As I said, media companies generally understand the value of authenticated user data, and this is a major reason why the top streaming companies in the U.S. have pretty much all integrated with UID 2.0 or are planning to. The latest was Warner Brothers Discovery, who announced at Cannes that they will integrate UID 2.0 across all of their streaming properties, including Max and Discovery+. The broad embrace of UID 2.0 across the CTV ecosystem has been driven in part by a key economic factor. Streaming leaders need to unleash the value of their authenticated data for advertisers in order to create as much precision and relevance as possible, thereby maximizing their CPMs. In order for the streaming business model to thrive and for media companies to keep pace in the content arms race, they need to maximize advertising revenue. As we have seen with every streaming platform launching an ad-supported service, a subscription-based approach is not enough, and the only way to maximize advertising revenue is to increase precision and relevance. With UID 2.0, the advertiser can start with authenticated data, enrich that with their own and third-party data, and then where they can find the right relevant audience, they will pay a meaningfully higher price. As Tim Sims outlined during our Investor Day, where advertisers are able to bid with certainty based on relevance and precision, the value of each impression increases significantly, generally exponentially. Ultimately, this is how we will answer some of the vexing questions that have been swirling around the TV industry recently. While we are still in the early days of the CTV advertising revolution, I'm confident that emerging innovations on our platform, such as a forward market for CTV advertising, will only accelerate advertisers' ability and appetite to fund this amazing new golden age of TV. It's also worth pointing out that this is an increasingly global trend. At Cannes this year, for example, we announced a new partnership with RTL, one of the largest Pan-European media companies. Through this partnership, our international advertisers will have exclusive programmatic access to RTL's addressable, linear, and connected TV inventory. We are starting with inventory across Germany, Spain, France, and Austria, with more European markets to follow soon. This represents our most significant step yet into the European CTV market. It's also indicative of how the major European media companies are keeping pace with changing viewer preferences and advertiser demand to meet viewers where they are and where they are most leaned in. As many of you have seen, we had a lot to say about retail and CTV during our recent Kokai launch. I'd just like to take a moment to put that in perspective. As advertisers increasingly prioritize CTV and retail, it's critical that we continue to innovate in our platform so that we surface value for our users as intuitively as possible. One way Kokai accomplishes this is with a series of new indexes or benchmarks that help advertisers understand and measure performance. In the retail arena, we launched the Retail Sales Index. The RSI helps advertisers understand the impact of their retail media spend across multiple retailers at once. In this way, we are massively reducing the complexity of measuring ad campaigns that run across multiple retail data sets. Now, advertisers can understand which retail environments perform better at different times, in which channels, for which kinds of creatives, all in one place. In doing so, we are providing a level of objectivity and measurement from the bottom of the funnel all the way to the top that is simply not possible within a walled garden. In addition to that, we also announced a few pioneering retailers who are making retail measurement available for free in our platform if the advertiser has activated their retail data for targeting. These retailers include Walgreens, Dollar General, and Albertsons. This is a major step forward in bringing the full value of retail media to bear in service of greater precision and certainty. In the CTV space, we launched the TV Quality Index, or TVQI. As the CTV advertising market has multiplied in terms of inventory, there are some who would have you believe that a piece of user-generated content has the same quality in the eyes of the viewer as professionally produced content or live sports. Yes, I know there are some UGC influencers who have millions of followers that some brands may target from time to time, but that's a very small slice of UGC. The vast bulk of it is very unattractive and sometimes even unsafe for brand advertisers. The TVQI helps advertisers understand the value of the impressions they are buying in the context of the quality of the content those impressions are served against. The index shows that for every 10-point improvement in quality, there is a 15-point improvement in conversion rates. Sometimes it's even higher than that, and for our own campaigns, for The Trade Desk, in the second quarter of this year, as we were beta testing TVQI, we found that a 19-point increase in the index score resulted in a 50-point improvement in our conversion rate. If you're a marketing leader, these are substantial performance improvements. I mentioned those two elements of Kokai because they're important to understand in the context of CTV and retailer. As more advertisers gravitate to CTV and retail because they offer more certainty in starting advertising campaigns based on authenticated audience data, these Kokai innovations provide more certainty through the course of the campaign in terms of measurement and performance optimization. Of course, there are many other aspects of Kokai that we unveiled on June 6, some of which are live and many of which we will be launching in the next few months. These indexes and other innovations, especially around the application of AI across our platform, are helping us surface value more intuitively to advertisers. We are revamping our UX so that the campaign setup and optimization experience is even more intuitive, with data next to decisions at every step. We're making it easier than ever for thousands of data, inventory, measurement, and media partners to integrate with us. In doing so, I believe that The Trade Desk will become an essential innovation hub of the open internet. I'd like to end on this point, because I think it's important to reiterate that there are many things we do at The Trade Desk that are not in our immediate business interest. UID 2.0, for example, is an innovation we devised about 3 years ago and promptly gave it away to the industry. We're seeing broad adoption across the data and inventory ecosystems of the open internet and accelerating use by advertisers. In many ways, the industry is looking at innovations like UID 2.0 as a core element of the flight to certainty that is driving a lot of advertiser action today. If an advertiser has certainty that they are reaching the right person across all channels, they will prioritize that ad buy. CTV and retail are major advancements in this regard, but UID 2.0 is a major building block of this new cross-channel identity fabric, too. This is particularly important as there has recently been a lot of speculation regarding the potential demise of third-party cookies in Chrome in early 2024. A lot of this speculation reminds me of the frenzy in 2017 when Safari deprecated cookies, or more recently in 2021, when Apple made its IDFA changes. Each time I have stated that none of this will have a significant material effect on our business, and that was true. I've said many times that I'm not sure that it's in Google's best interest to get rid of third-party cookies because of the harmful impact it will likely have on publishers that have not implemented a strong identity strategy. While it matters a lot to many browser-based publishers, in the long run, it really doesn't matter that much to us. Advertisers will increasingly select ad opportunities where they can act with certainty and leverage their own data. That's why I've spent so much time today talking about CTV, retail, and UID 2.0, as they have become essential building blocks of the open internet. On the supply side, we developed Open Path to provide our clients with a direct, transparent path to inventory. This is just the latest effort by The Trade Desk to improve supply-side transparency and objectivity. We now have thousands of destinations across the open internet integrating with Open Path. When advertisers see an Open Path channel to inventory, they are more likely to select it versus the 8-10 alternative paths to that same impression, because there's more certainty. Now, integrating with Unified ID 2.0, OpenPath or any number of other innovations or offerings on our platform is easier than ever with Kokai. We believe that to truly optimize the value of the open internet, there are many ways in which the industry needs to innovate together, so we can provide advertisers, as an ecosystem, with more certainty, transparency, and objectivity. In recent weeks, we've heard even more about the alleged dubious behavior of walled gardens, whether it's from the European Commission or independent research reports. Advertisers and media companies are increasingly aware that they need to work with technology partners who represent their interests, not conflicts of interest. As a result, advertising dollars are shifting to our platform. We will continue to invest in our platform and push the industry to create even more value for advertisers on the open internet. Our recent outperformance is not a temporary blip, I believe it is the start of a reassessment of the value of the internet, particularly from an advertiser's perspective, and I could not be more excited about the growth opportunity that is in front of us in the years ahead as a result. With that, I'll hand it over to Laura to cover our financials. Thank you, Jeff. Good afternoon, everyone. For nearly the past 10 years, I've experienced firsthand all of the incredible work from The Trade Desk teams around the world that produce our outstanding performance that have enabled us to manage the right balance between strong growth and significant profitability. I'm proud to present our results today and going forward. With that, onto the numbers. As you've seen in our results, Q2 was a strong quarter. Revenue was $464 million, representing growth of 23% year-over-year, accelerating from the prior quarter. Excluding U.S. political election spend, which represented a low single-digit percent of spend in Q2 2022, our revenue growth rate in Q2 of this year was about 24.5% on a year-over-year basis. Visibility and advertiser sentiment continued to improve throughout the quarter. We continued to gain share as marketers increasingly focus their investments on areas where data is deployed effectively, where AI and decisioning produce high ROI, and where results are measurable and transparent. Our growth continued to be driven by the shift of budgets to connected TV and increasing use of retail data. Because of our objectivity and our connectivity to nearly every major CTV content provider, our platform is the most eligible for the tidal wave of demand as it shifts away from linear and walled gardens. In retail media, many of the largest retailers around the world are now our partners. More and more brands and agencies are taking advantage of this powerful data in their campaigns. We also continue to benefit from the trust we've built with our clients, launching innovative products in the interest of the demand side, paving cleaner paths to supply, and cultivating industry-wide support for improved identity solutions like UID 2.0 and EUID. During the second quarter, growth was broad-based across channels, verticals, and regions. CTV led our growth from a scaled channel perspective once again. We saw strong momentum again in retail media as we launched integrations with more retailers and won incremental shopper marketing budgets. International spend growth accelerated off a strong Q1, with notably strong performance in CTV. With the launch of Kokai in early June, we are well positioned for the second half of the year and 2024 as visibility and advertiser sentiment improve. With the strong top-line performance in Q2, we generated approximately $180 million in adjusted EBITDA, or about 39% of revenue. When we outperform on the top line, we often see that outperformance throughout all our financial statements, as was the case again in Q2. This outperformance led to free cash flow of $119 million in Q2. Our unique ability to generate meaningfully positive EBITDA and cash flow continues to put us in a strong position as we look ahead and invest in the critical areas of the business that will drive our growth in the years to come. This is an area I'm intently focused on, making certain that our productivity and efficiency remains best-in-class as we scale, as we manage both industry-leading growth and significant profitability. I believe this is a critical factor to our success in the next phase of growth. From a scale channel perspective, CTV, by a wide margin, led our growth again during the quarter. In Q2, video, which includes CTV, represented a mid-40s percent share of our business and continues to grow as a percentage of our mix. Mobile represented a mid-30s percent share of spend during the quarter. Display continued to represent a low double-digit percent share of our business, and audio represented around 5%. Geographically, North America represented about 88% of our business in Q2, and international represented about 12%. We are pleased that international growth slightly outpaced North America for the second quarter in a row. Looking ahead, we see significant opportunities to capture share in international markets as operating conditions continue to improve. In terms of the verticals that represent at least 1% of our spend, travel more than doubled compared with a year ago as the sector continues to recover. Automotive was strong once again, with growth accelerating each month during the quarter due to share gains and recovery. We also saw strong performance in home and garden and food and beverage, while shopping and business were below the average. We continue to believe there is still opportunity for us to gain share in most of our verticals. Turning now to expenses. Excluding stock-based compensation, operating expenses in Q2 were $305 million, up 22% year-over-year. There are ample opportunities to achieve significantly more leverage within our operating expenses. Our primary objective remains on growing spend on our platform and grabbing land. During the second quarter, we continued to invest in our team, our platform, and our infrastructure to support sustained growth. The year-over-year increase in operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation, included realized costs from our 2022 hiring ramp, infrastructure investments, and return to office expenses. Because we have responsibly managed headcount and operating expenses over the last few years, we're in a strong position to continue innovating for clients, growing our teams, and widening the distance between us and our competitors. Income tax expense was $27 million for the second quarter, driven primarily by our pre-tax profitability and nondeductible stock-based compensation. Adjusted net income was $139 million, or $0.28 per fully diluted share. Net cash provided by operating activities was $128 million for Q2, and free cash flow was $119 million. DSOs exiting the quarter were 92 days, up about 1 day from a year ago. DPOs were 76 days, up about 3 days from a year ago. In Q2, via our share repurchase program, we repurchased and retired 595,000 shares for an aggregate repurchase amount of $44 million. We exited the quarter with a strong cash and liquidity position. Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments ended the quarter at $1.4 billion. We have no debt on the balance sheet. Turning to our outlook for the third quarter, while macro conditions remain uncertain, visibility has improved slightly since the beginning of the year. We estimate Q3 revenue to be at least $485 million, which would represent growth of 23% on a year-over-year basis. Excluding U.S. political election spend, which represented a low single-digit percent of spend in Q3 2022, our estimated revenue growth rate in Q3 of this year would be about 25% on a year-over-year basis. We estimate adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $185 million in Q3. In closing, we're extremely pleased with our strong performance in the first half of the year. I have always seen the immense opportunity this company has. Frankly, that opportunity has never been clearer than it is today. We have a large and growing addressable market in front of us. We have a business model that's proven to generate strong top-line growth, in addition to significant profitability and cash flow. With growth drivers, including CTV, retail media, our international business, a strong identity strategy, a 2024 U.S. election year cycle, and a significant product upgrade with Kokai, among others, we remain highly optimistic about our future as we move through the second half of 2023 and into 2024. That concludes our prepared remarks. With that, operator, let's open up the call for questions. Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star key. one moment, please, while we pull for questions. The first question comes from Shyam Patil from SIG. Please proceed. Hey, guys. Congrats on another, another strong performance. I had a two-part question. First, for Jeff, could you provide your thoughts on the macro and the current conditions, and also your initial thoughts on next year, on 2024? Then, Laura, can you talk about how you're thinking about investments and expenses in the back half of this year, but also next year as well? Thank you, guys. Thanks for the question, Shyam, and great to hear from you. I'll go first, and then I'll just hand it over to Laura to talk about investments and expenses. You know, it's not news to anybody to hear that the last two or three years have been a few years of uncertainty and unpredictability for most advertisers and most of the Fortune 500. As a result, I'm extremely excited by the change in sentiment that we've seen in Q2 and see already in Q3, where CMOs are doubling down on what's driving growth. There's an understanding, of course, that the markets have begun to recover, and there's more certainty than they've had in the past. They've also come to rely on data-driven advertising during that time of uncertainty as a place for certainty and for results. So we're seeing lots of shifts due to what they've experienced in the last few years in CTV, and then, of course, this massive secular tailwind that comes from retail data as well. As I've said before, I believe ultimately, the shape of the internet changes dramatically as a result of CTV and, and retail media. Then, of course, we've also seen some amazing results as a result of UID 2.0 adoption. You, you might have caught during the prepared remarks that Warner Brothers was kind of the last of the U.S. independent CTV players to adopt UID 2.0. Now, in a way, UID 2.0 has the full collection here in the U.S., and that has become the common currency to monetize CTV in the ad environments. We expect that trend to continue, and, and we're seeing more and more of that. For the second part of your question for me, 2024 is looking like the tidal wave of opportunity that is both daunting as well as just massive in terms of, of what an incredible chance this is for us to once again, grab land. Let me first just talk about some of the backdrop for 2024. You know, there's been a lot of pressure on Google over the last few years as it relates to antitrust, as well as privacy. Of course, there's a balance between those two, that a few years ago, there was a lot more pressure on the privacy side of that. Today, there's a lot more pressure on the antitrust side of that, which we think overall makes the market a bit more fair and makes it easier to predict Google's decisions. It also makes it so that they're undoubtedly going slower, and that creates opportunity for us to once again, grab land. I have said over and over again. That linear television is not going to be a steady decline. Excuse me. It ends with an explosion. It's gonna have a pretty steady then accelerating decay, and then there's a point where it stops being worth it for anybody to operate in the space. You kind of got a glimpse of this when Bob Iger was saying three weeks ago on CNBC that he's unsure about ABC's future and their linear business model being broken, of course, that streaming and the studios are very important to the future of the business. That, that business model is really talking about legacy, linear and broadcast television. That, of course, the future is streaming. That represents one of the many opportunities for us in 2024. Now is, is our opportunity to demonstrate the power of decisioning, which is really what our, our brand new product release, Kokai, is all about. We also have some major advances going into next year as it relates to the forward market. When you add CTV, retail media, Kokai, UID 2.0, OpenPath, international opportunities, political, the list goes on and on. Of course, Disney announced today that they'll roll out ad-supported models internationally for Disney+. We think that's one of many opportunities around the world for us as it relates to CTV. The secular tailwinds just keep piling up. Very excited about all that. I'll turn it over to Laura to talk about investments and expenses. Thanks, Jeff, and Shyam, thanks for the question. In terms of our investments for the second half of 2023 and going into 2024, I'll start off just the big picture and then get into the specifics of what we're seeing. Just always remind myself that we've got the great luxury of high growth, profitability, and cash flow, and we've been responsibly managing our headcount, OpEx growth, and investments for many years now. In the first half of 2023, we grew revenue in the 20% range, and we just guided to continued growth, acceleration, and revenue when you exclude U.S. election spend that we saw in the same period in 2022. From my perspective, we're in an enviable position, while many of our other peers have struggled. When I look out at the rest of 2023, I just look at how we're being very deliberate in our investments and in our hiring, and we still expect headcount to grow this year, but roughly at half the rate as last year, which implies around 20%. That sets us up very nicely for 2024, just as I remind everyone that our people are our largest area of investment. We're also investing heavily into our platform and our products, specifically in areas like CTV and our forward market product and in retail media. As we're doing this, we're focusing heavily on productivity and efficiency with all of our teams, from our engineering teams to our go-to-market business, sales, AM, and trading teams, to make sure that we believe that all of our teams are firing on all cylinders. For this year, we also expect CapEx to be lower than last year. Last year, we came in with around $80 million of investments, and I'd expect that to be around $60 million in 2023. Just a reminder, our CapEx levels include all of our AI investments, and we don't expect any significant step-up in investments that you may have seen in some other firms. Just to sum up, and as it relates to our modeling, as we've seen in the past, when we outperform on the top line, that usually drops down to the bottom line, as, as happened in Q1 and Q2 of this year. We're very comfortable with where things stand and cautiously optimistic about our business for the rest of the year. Great. Thank you, guys. The next question is from Shweta Khajuria with Evercore ISI. Please proceed. Okay, thank you for taking my question. Jeff, I have a question on cookie deprecation. You touched on this in your prepared remarks, and there's quite a bit of focus on it, given that we are coming close to 2024 here and Google's plan to deprecate cookies. Would love to hear your thoughts on how you think it. The magnitude of impact on The Trade Desk in particular, why you think it's not gonna be meaningful, and the overall industry, how you think about the impact. That's it for me. Thank you. You bet. Thanks, Shweta. I appreciate the question. First, let me just say, we've been down this path before. When Safari made cookies go away, there was anxiety. When GDPR first came out, there was anxiety, and IDFA removal happened, there was anxiety. In every one of those cases, our business continued to grow, and we saw very little impact, a speed bump at, at, at best. I, I see this as slightly, or not slightly, it's exactly the same as all of those other things. The reason for that is because of a phenomenon that is just different about our business than most other businesses that are in this space. We look at 12 million ad opportunities every second, and we choose from those, 1 or 2 million that we want to buy. If identity is removed from, from instead of it being on 6 million, it's now on 3 million, it just informs which ones we buy differently. We're still gonna buy the same amount, and we're still gonna be informed on the vast majority of those. And in part, because we've been so strong in growing CTV as well as leveraging UID 2.0, we have an alternative in the biggest driver of our business in CTV that is present on nearly 100% of impressions, which is way better than anything in the browsing internet world. Just to be clear, what this directly impacts is the browsing internet world of everything that runs on top of Chrome. Now let me talk for a second about the industry and be a bit more holistic, because hopefully, I've made my point that I don't believe this impacts us in any meaningful way. In fact, I think you can make the argument that it affects us in a positive way, just as much as it does a negative way, just because it would be negative to all the players that are dependent on cookies, and because so much of our business now is driven off of UID 2.0 and CTV. I think you can make the argument that we would benefit from sort of hurting lots of the independent competition. It is actually for that reason that I believe it is a strategic mistake for Google to get rid of cookies. As they're facing more antitrust scrutiny rather than any other regulatory scrutiny, I don't think it's in their best interest to do. I think because of the way that the case dates are stacking up, that they won't likely make any decisions until the end of Q1 next year. If they do make cookies go away, then I do think it will be very bad for some publishers, especially those touching journalism that were historically print journalists. I do believe that will really have a bad effect upon them, and it won't have a great effect on the open internet. I do think it will be good for us. I do think that many of the consumer data companies will actually be better off, 'cause nearly all of their data is anchored off of an email address, and the way that we leverage data is just much, much better in a world built around UID 2.0. I do think that it would accelerate the adoption of UID 2.0 into the browsing internet world, not just among CTV and audio, and that would ultimately be good for us, but I don't think there would be a quick recovery for many of the web-based publishers, especially those affecting journalism. It would be a net negative for the open internet, but probably a slight positive for us. Okay. Thank you, Jeff. Thanks. The next question is from Vasily Karasyov, from Cannonball Research. Please proceed. Thank you. Jeff, wanted to ask you about retail media. You spoke about the success you're having with Walmart. We, we know that last year there was a group of retailers that also came online. Question number 1, how is that coming along? Should we see contribution to revenue next year from those retailers? Given that, would you be willing to update your thoughts on your TAM in retail media that you gave us at your Investor Day last October? Thank you. You bet. Thank you. Let me first explain one of the reasons why I think it's so exciting what's happening in shopper marketing. Of course, many retailers have been sitting on amazing data where they know what's actually being purchased, especially for those products that you tend to buy at the store and not online. Many of the products in grocery stores and pharmacies are still primarily purchased in a store rather than online. Of course, many of them have amazing online presences as well, as of course, brick-and-mortar or offline. Many of them are bringing their data into the ecosystem, and they've recognized that the way that they've operated in the past creates a bit of a needle in a haystack problem, where you take a small amount of data and you go look in that massive ocean of 12 million ads available every single second, and you go look for the usually thousands or tens of thousands that have your data on it. So you start with the data, and you go hunting for it. Well, in this new world where things are leveraging UID from the very beginning, you get rid of the sort of 9 dominoes that need to fall in the supply chain so that you can then leverage the data. Instead, you start with the data, and you're actually just looking at the opportunities that match that instead of going out looking for opportunities in that way. By starting with the data, you make it so that you get rid of the matching problems of cookies, and you make it so that the flywheel spins faster for all of these businesses, so that they're not just making additional money on a small amount of data, but they're actually selling more products across their entire company. It's actually part of the reason why I believe that the moves that were made by three of the most forward-looking pioneers in the retail data space, which includes Dollar General, Albertsons, Walgreens, that were all looking for an opportunity to do something new in data. They, they made their data available for free, so long as people will pay to use it for targeting. Their data is available for measurement so that advertisers can, without any significant opt-in or any friction, find out where they're selling products. It's their belief, as well as ours, that that will make it so that people are automatically optimizing their advertising purchases to sell products in those 3 stores. If we're all proven right, we think this represents a massive change to the way people leverage data in brick-and-mortar stores and in retail, that just will continue to accelerate this flywheel that is spinning in shopper marketing. I just wanna remind everybody that, that shopper marketing is not just about shopper marketing itself. It is about improving the entire funnel. Every CPG has massive amounts of incremental data and insight to know where to spend their money in advertising so that they are being more effective. All of this has the sort of a flywheel effect of improving decisioning, moving more dollars to our platform, making efficacy go up across everything on our platform. Of course, there is an overlap between shopper marketing and CTV, where they both benefit from each other, especially because in most cases their data is anchored off of UID 2.0, which, of course, is email-based in both the shopper marketing world and in the CTV world. All of that together creates just yet another amazing secular tailwind for us in shopper marketing or retail. Thanks. Thanks, Vasily. Okay, the next question is from Matthew Cost with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed. Great. Hi, everybody. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe just on the CTV market, when we think about what you've learned through the upfront, you know, this year, how are you feeling about, you know, growth and trends in the market through the back half and into 2024? Then on a related note, if you could just give an update on the new forward market, you know, what is the, the level of interest, and how are those conversations trending for that new product? Thanks. Thank you. Let me just say that I, I have never been more bullish on CTV than we are right now, and that includes all of the major news and headlines that are contributing to the current environment. You're seeing everyone in CTV look to add and/or enhance their ad-funded options. Nearly all of them are doubling down on the ad-funded options. Where just a few years ago, there was religion around only having subscriptions and not having ads, that's gone across the board. Everybody's looking to add ads and make them more effective. The secular tailwind on our business is as great as it's ever been because of those things. Because there, of course, is a Writers and Actors Strike that makes it so it's much harder to sell at the upfront for all these content owners, which, of course, the upfront is predominantly built for broadcast and legacy television. In order to take advantage of the very best of digital, we need a more sophisticated forward market than just the upfront, which is effectively a party where transactions are done with handshakes and very high-level data, instead of the sort of precision that data-driven advertising can bring in an impression by impression and customize user by user that environment can bring. Our product that we have been working on literally for years, on the forward market, makes it possible for people to have a much more sophisticated upfront buy. The early phases have gone well. It is still very early phase, so I don't expect it, it, to see all of the, the fruit harvested in even in 2024. This is gonna be something that we build up over the years, but I see it in the long term being a very significant portion of our business. Thanks, Matt. Our next question is from Justin Patterson with KeyBanc. Please proceed. Great. Thank you very much, and good afternoon. Jeff, I was hoping you could talk about the Kokai launch. I know it's really early, but would love to hear feedback on just initial reaction, how it's compared to your expectations, and just perhaps even stepping back, some of, some of the behaviors you're observing from this versus what you've seen in prior launches like Solimar and Next Wave. As a quick follow-up for Laura, could you talk a little bit about just linearity in June and July? There's been a, a couple of prints so far this earnings season, talking about a little bit more macro softness in there. Curious about any trends you've seen there. Thanks so much. You bet. Thanks, Justin, for the question. I'll take the first part and then have Laura, you take the second. First, let me explain what Kokai is. Kokai is a Japanese word that means open for business or open waters. The reason why we chose that is because we believe this is a very important moment in the open Internet to make it possible for more and more companies to build to us in a variety of ways. One of them, being to sell their products, so we have value-added resellers that are selling on our product all the time, whether that's in data, whether that's in algos. There's a whole bunch of ways, with contextual data, so many ways. The other is them, is advertisers in particular, bringing their first-party data to the table. With, with those as the overarching mission, Kokai has really built, like, in five major sort of categories or pieces. The first is massive improvement to the use of data. You'll recall we launched Galileo earlier this year, and we also announced at Kokai, the creation of a partner portal where people can integrate to onboard their first-party data. The second is the use of AI across our platform. You'll recall that we launched AI in our platform in 2018, before it was trendy. We called it then Koa, and distributing that AI across the, the, the platform in a variety of different ways and different deep learning models, so that we're using that for very specific applications, rather than trying to create one algorithm to rule them all, if you will, which is something we actually very, in a very disciplined way, try to avoid, so that we can create checks and balances in the way that the tech works, and we can make certain that AI is always providing improvements by essentially having A/B testing and better auditability. The third thing is measurement. First, we improved data onboarding. Second, we improved AI distributed throughout the system. Third, we improved measurement so that we can measure the efficacy of ads, especially using retail data. We came up with a couple new ways of measuring, which is the Retail Sales Index, where we take a variety of different retailers and put all of their data together so that they're way better than the sum of the parts. TVQI, the TV Quality Index, where we're helping advertisers see the benefit of being on premium content versus cat videos or worse, that often comes from user-generated content. Fourth, in the second half of the year, there will be a new user experience. That's right around the corner, of course, because we're in the second half of the year. Very excited about what that means. I believe this is our biggest and most impressive UX upgrade ever, and it's going to create better behaviors among buyers. Because it comes with much better forecasting, they'll get to see the decisions they're making and the impact before they even run, which is new. That is something much better than what we've had over the last 14 years. I'm very excited about what that, that means. Then, last but not least, is integrations for better CTV measurement and performance across the board as well. Lots to be excited about, but Kokai is our biggest release. I expect it to be our most successful, but I will say that because this requires adoption, during the busiest time of the year, because this requires a change in behavior, I don't expect there to be lots of adoption during the busiest time of the year, and so most of the benefits will be reaped in 2024 and 2025. We're seeing a lot of the rollout of, especially the first couple that I mentioned, already, seeing some impact already, seeing some performance enhancements. As we go into 2024, we expect this to once again change the way that media buying is performed. Laura, do you mind taking the second half of the question? Yeah, absolutely. Thanks, Justin. On linearity in June and July, we've seen visibility improve as the year progressed, and we continued to see improving trends throughout Q2, where we saw our revenue growth accelerate to north of 23% year-over-year from around 21% in Q1. We exited June on a great trajectory, and that's continued so far in Q3. We expect a strong Q3 for the same reasons that we outperformed the rest of digital advertising over the last few quarters, which is that we're continuing to see strong growth in CTV, in retail media, and in international spend, all of which have been accretive to us this year. I believe we maintain-- we remain, excuse me, well-positioned for the second half of 2023 and even farther out as we move into 2024. Thank you both. The next question is from Brian Fitzgerald with Wells Fargo. Your line is live. Thanks, Jeff. We've seen some developments around quote-unquote, "premium marketplaces" in CTV built around SSPs. As you talk with marketers, do you get a sense that some may be willing to give up some of the precision or expressiveness with which they manage their programmatic CTV budgets in exchange for a lower tech tax, or are they really more focused on getting as precise as possible to maximize ROI? Thanks. Yeah, thanks for the question. So, let me first just describe a conversation that I had with the CEO of one of the publicly traded SSPs, where we were just talking about PG, or programmatic guarantees, and just talking about how he saw things. He and I agreed that, as people are moving budgets over from traditional television or linear, they are... Sorry. As they're moving over budgets from traditional TV or linear, they're often looking for programmatic guarantees as the place where they'll spend first. He and I both agreed, they always end with spending in decisions, because decisioning is much, much better. We've recently done some studies on decisioning across the platform and compared it to PG, and we found that the value of decisioning or the performance of the decisioning on a CPA basis is 5x better in general. Or if you were to say it in terms of savings, it's an 83% save in order to in CPA costs, in order to decision. Whatever incremental tax, as you put it, comes, which is usually, you know, in our case, the 20%-ish take rate, that take rate is more than justified by the power of decisioning that comes to the table. That's exactly why even the SSPs and their, their leadership are predicting that long-term things move towards decisioning. The PG is an on-ramp. We sometimes compare it to a freeway, where it's an on-ramp and you get on the freeway, but if you stay on the on-ramp, you're doing it wrong. That's what we see happening, that's what we think the SSP see happening, but there will be some moves in the very short term towards these premium PMPs that are centered around especially programmatic guarantees, that long term, we think, move towards decisioning and broader data usage. Got it. Thanks, Jeff. Thank you, Brian. The next question is from Dan Salmon with New Street Research. Please proceed. Okay, great. Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. I got a two-parter here. Jeff, maybe could you give us an update on any discussions you're having with industry bodies to act as a public administrator for UID 2.0 in various markets? Is that still an important goal? Are you happy with existing relationships? You know, obviously, you've got a lot of private integrations you've done as well. Then second, you mentioned how identity is increasingly anchored by an email address, yet it's pretty clear that Apple doesn't exactly love the use of emails for marketing purposes. Is that something that matters to you, or do you feel comfortable with the level of consent that UID 2.0 collects? Because Apple also seems fine when digital advertising uses consented first-party data. Any views on that would be great. Thanks. Yeah. Let me go in reverse order just 'cause I think the significance of your comments around Apple is important. Any of us that operate in the Apple ecosystem are putting in our Apple ID, which incidentally is an email address, over and over and over again. In fact, we're not even we don't even know why we're putting it in most of the time. You're asked to put it in, you say, "Why?" And then you put it in, and then you're asked again, and then you put it in, and you are asked again. Apple has used their email-based identifier to provide personalization. They have updated many of the things that they said they wouldn't do before, so that they, they can leverage that Apple ID to provide personalization. It is exactly that, that I think provides a validation that UID 2.0 is one of the most privacy-centric ways to provide personalization across the internet. It's used across many of the biggest platforms and with some of the biggest companies in the world, whether that's at Amazon, whether that's at Snowflake, whether that's at Disney. There's just hundreds of companies that are leveraging that, which, of course, is based on an email address, not dissimilar from the massive empires at Google and Apple, which are also built around email-based identifiers. I, I don't think the comparison that Apple is allergic to them is fair, 'cause their entire ecosystem is built on an email-based identifier. As it relates to the public administrator of UID 2.0, honestly, it's not that important. Most of our integrations are done privately. Of course, we're happy to hand it off and look for the right public administrator as it continues to scale and as it becomes a more pressing issue, but it hasn't been yet. We wanna make certain that somebody that is that public administrator, of course, shares the vision of protecting the open internet, and at times is willing to stand up and do the right thing, even if it's not popular. That can be very difficult to find, and so that's something that we'll, we'll be very deliberate about, but it has not slowed down anything in not having that, so we're not in any rush to change the status quo. Thanks, Dan. Thank you. The next question is from Mark Zgutowicz with Benchmark. Please proceed. Thank you. Good evening. Jeff, just regarding an earlier comment you made, just hoping to get clarification. I think you had said UID 2.0 benefits you more in a cookie-less world, and I'm just curious how that is? 'Cause it's, it's predominantly used as a matching mechanism between large pubs and advertisers, and, you know, that data signal isn't sort of privy to you. I'm trying to just understand that a bit more. Then secondly, regarding OpenPath, appears that there's a natural hesitancy that we're hearing among publishers, large pubs, to giving you more view into CTV inventory or, or autonomy per se. I'm just curious if you agree with that and, and how you overcome it? Thanks. Yeah, thanks for the question, Mark. The reason why we benefit for from cookies potentially going away in the form of UID 2.0, is that we've been saying to advertisers, every advertiser needs to have an identity strategy. We've been saying to publishers, every publisher needs to have an identity strategy and an authentication strategy. By, by authentication, we mean there needs to be some way that you're encouraging people to log in, and in the case that you have logins, finding some way to leverage them. Very few companies on the internet are leveraging their logins to provide personalization to the level that they could be. There certainly hasn't been much effort to leverage those outside of their own ecosystems, or to make it possible for those that are bringing advertising demand to leverage the authentication on those particular publishers. If cookies were to go away, the need for that goes up dramatically. For many of the publishers, and we saw this with GDPR, we saw this with the IDFA movement, there are many publishers that are saying, "Oh, we'll wait until I have to. I'll wait to make changes until I have to." When they have to, they will make changes quickly. We saw a fire drill around GDPR among publishers, where they were very quickly working to create the right personalization again. Again, I just want to remind everybody what's at stake here. If think of how many print journalism companies have struggled to stay in business due to the internet. If you take their CPMs, where they get a significant amount of revenue from $5 per ad to $2 per ad because relevance goes down, then they no longer can stay around. That's why I say that cookies going away poses a threat to journalism. That would make it so that they're very quickly leveraging those logins, and when you're saying, "Oh, I get to see 1 out of 3 articles before I have to pay," I think you'll see a lot more of authentication at the beginning of almost every website. Not dissimilar from if you go to a furniture or clothing website today, the very first thing you see is, oh, type in your email address, and you get 10% off. If you type in your email address, only then will you get access to content. That will create much more authentication across the browsing web, and that will make it so that UID can be end-to-end without the syncing problems that cookie has. And those syncing problems going away would create a much more personalized internet. Again, because we go from the 12 million ads available every second down to the 1 million that we buy, if there's identity on slightly fewer of those, or in some cases, slightly fewer, but the signal is much, much stronger and reliable, that can be an upgrade. There's a whole bunch of room for upgrades. As it relates to your OpenPath question, honestly, I'm not really seeing the same thing that you're describing in terms of the obstacles. There's lots of discussion around the ways that we integrate. There's lots of discussion around priority, because many of the companies that are in the ad-funded CTV space are trying to enhance their ad-funded options, and they're working very quickly to try to enhance those. The amount of pressure on streaming companies, I would say, is at an all-time high right now, to grow and to grow profitably and to fund the content. And so often they're looking at ways to create more efficiency, and an OpenPath creates a more efficient supply chain. Something where there's a more efficient supply chain so that they take home a greater percentage of an ad dollar is a very important next step in the evolution of CTV and streaming. Thanks, Mark. John, let's just take one more question, and then we can close out the call. Thank you. Absolutely. The next question is from Mark Kelley with Stifel. Please proceed. Great. Thank you very much, I will stick to one since we're over time here. Jeff, I wanted to ask you about if you're seeing any impact from the MediaMath bankruptcy, and any other, you know, thoughts on share gains, whether it's from competing DSPs or, you know, Laura mentioned some verticals that you think maybe you under index. Any color there would be great. Thank you. Yeah, we've definitely seen some impacts to our business. Let me first just say, MediaMath is essentially exponentially smaller than we are. It's not a huge lift, but there are definitely some benefits. One of the first places was with employees. We have a lot of respect for what they had built, they did a lot of things right. They also had some different perspectives on some things than we did. We're excited to have added a few people from the MediaMath team to our company. There's also been some cases where there's business up for grabs. In some cases, we won that business outright. What most advertisers do, especially those that were running anything sizable on MediaMath, is they run a process. They test a variety of platforms. They put together a crawl, walk, run plans with each of them. I think we're benefiting from that as much as anybody in the space or in the world. As a result of those sort of deliberate crawl, crawl, walk, run efforts, I anticipate that it'll be a sort of slow increase, where we'll once again see benefits come at all different paces. We expect to win more business as a result, especially in next year. Thanks, Mark. John, can you please close the call out? Absolutely. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.