Good morning. Thank you for attending today's UMB Financial Q2 2024 financial results call. My name is Jennifer, and I'll be your moderator today. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call, with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. If you would like to ask a question, press star one on your telephone keypad. I'd now like to turn the call over to Kay Gregory, UMB Investor Relations. Kay, please proceed. Good morning, and welcome to our Q2 2024 call. Mariner Kemper, President and CEO, and Ram Shankar, CFO, will share a few comments about our results. Then we'll open up the call for questions. Jim Rine, CEO of UMB Bank, and Tom Terry, Chief Credit Officer, will be available for the question and answer session. Before we begin, let me remind you that today's presentation contains forward-looking statements, including the discussion of future financial and operating results, benefits, synergies, gains, and costs that the company expects to realize from the pending acquisition, as well as other opportunities management foresees. Forward-looking statements and any pro forma metrics are subject to assumptions, risks, and uncertainties as outlined in our SEC filings and summarized on slides 48-51 of our presentation. Actual results may differ from those set forth in forward-looking statements, which speak only as of today. We undertake no obligation to update them except to the extent required by securities laws. Presentations and materials are available online at investorrelations.umb.com and include reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures. Now, I'll turn the call over to Mariner Kemper. Thank you, Kay, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us as we discuss our great Q2 results announced yesterday afternoon. Our strong Q1 performance continued into the Q2, with net interest income growth driven by a growing balance sheet and net interest margin expansion, along with solid credit metrics. We reported GAAP earnings of $101.3 million, or $2.07 per share, driven by continued momentum across our various lines of business. On an operating basis, we earned $105.9 million, or $2.16 per share. Balance sheet growth included a 7.7% linked quarter annualized increase in average loan balances, led by commercial real estate and construction draws on previously approved lines. Additionally, average card balances increased 26.1%, assisted by the full quarter impact of our co-brand card portfolio we acquired in March. Top line loan production was $926 million for the quarter. Payoffs and paydowns, which are difficult to predict, were 3.7% of balances. This is a slight increase from prior quarter, but in line with our historic averages. Credit quality in our loan portfolio remains excellent. Net charge-offs were again just 5 basis points of average loans for the quarter, and non-performing loans fell to a meager 6 basis points of total loans. Over the past 8 quarters, our non-performing ratio has averaged 8 basis points, compared to 39 basis points for our peer group and 35 basis points for the industry as a whole. Credit cards drove the small amount of charge-offs we saw in the quarter, while we had a net recovery in both C&I and specialty lending. In fact, C&I has posted net recoveries in four of the last five quarters. Asset quality has been very strong in our investment real estate portfolio. Since 2016, we charged off less than $1 million cumulatively, which can be attributed to just three loans. Provision of $14.1 million reflects the continued loan growth, along with the impact of a recalibration of our models. Our coverage ratio increased three basis points to 0.99% of total loans. Average total deposits grew $815 million, or 9.7% on a linked quarter annualized basis, including the intentional reduction of brokered CD balances and the expected seasonal decline in public funds. For comparison, peers have reported a median annualized increase of just 4.5% for the Q2. Deposit growth in the quarter highlights our strong, diversified funding profile, with growth coming from nearly all lines of business. On the consumer front, we've had good success from private banking and retail money market promotions, with targeted marketing investments made in the first half of the year. Excluding brokered CDs, average client deposits increased approximately $1.3 billion from the last quarter. In fact, since the turmoil of last spring, our deposits, excluding brokered CDs, have increased by $4.2 billion, or 14% over the Q2 of 2023. Ram will share a more detailed look at these and other quarterly drivers shortly. Finally, we remain excited about our pending acquisition of Heartland Financial and have shared a few updates in the deck. While it's early in the process, we've outlined milestones and progress in the integration planning. Our focus is to ensure a seamless transition without disrupting business as usual activities. The establishment of an integration team allows our customer-facing associates to remain focused on serving the customer and generating growth. Again, we believe this transaction will accelerate UMB's growth strategy, further diversifying and de-risking our business model. The addition of this high-quality franchise is a great fit from a strategic, financial, and cultural perspective.... and we look forward to capitalizing on the many opportunities we see as a combined company in 2025 and beyond. Now I'll turn it over to Ram. Thanks, Mariner. Net interest income of $245.1 million represented an increase of $5.7 million or 2.4%, reflecting continued loan growth and higher levels of liquidity. Net interest margin increased 3 basis points on a linked quarter basis to 2.51%, outpacing the expectations I shared previously, in large part due to stronger than expected DDA balances. The increase was driven by the positive impact of 7 basis points from loan repricing and mix, 2 basis points from the securities portfolio, 1 basis point from the level of free funds, and 2 basis points related to various smaller items. These were partially offset by a nine basis point reduction from higher deposit pricing, driven by mixed changes. Cycle to date betas on total deposits and on loan yields are 53% and 63% respectively, and continue to track closely to our expectations for terminal betas. Looking into the Q3, with the prospect of a Fed rate cut in September, we would expect our net interest margin to be relatively stable to Q2 levels. Approximately 31% of our total deposits are hard indexed to short-term interest rates. As the Fed funds rate changes, these deposits reprice down immediately. An additional 17% of our total deposits are what we call soft indexed, or balances negotiated at current prevailing market rates. On these soft indexed deposits, we would expect to move deposit rates down pretty quickly following any rate cuts. Overall, we expect our deposit betas on the way down to be immediate and steeper than peer banks, similar to our experience during this past tightening cycle. Coupled with favorable reinvestment of cash flows from the securities book and repricing of some loans at accretive yields, our interest rate simulation results, shown on page 33 of our deck, shows us as benefiting from interest rate cuts in year 1, with fairly neutral implications for year 2. As a reminder, this analysis does not include any interest income generated from new growth or the Heartland acquisition. At this preliminary stage, we estimate that our pro forma interest rate position will remain relatively neutral. Details and activity in our securities portfolio are shown on slides 30 and 31 in our deck. The combined AFS and HTM portfolios averaged $12.2 billion during the quarter, a decrease of 2.3%. We continued to purchase mortgage-backed securities and agencies, while as noted, security levels fluctuate based on our collateral needs for both public funds and trust deposits. The average purchase yield in our portfolio was 4.99% for the quarter, while securities rolling off had a yield of 2.67%. We expect $1.4 billion of securities with a yield of 2.54% to roll off over the next 12 months. Capital levels continued to build with our Common Equity Tier 1 capital increasing to 11.14% and continued growth in tangible book value, which increased by $1.57 from March 31st to $60.58. Tangible book value per share has grown 15.3% over the past year. As previously described in our forward purchase agreement, our regulatory capital ratios do not include the $230 million forward equity offering agreement that we announced in April. Turning back to the income statement, non-interest income was $144.9 million, a linked quarter reduction of 9%, largely due to a few non-recurring items in the prior quarter. These Q1 benefits included $8.6 million in net gains on equity position, a $4 million legal settlement, and a $1.8 million in gains on the sale of land. Momentum in our fee businesses continued, with Fund Services assets under administration growing to $460 billion, an increase of 20% from June 30, 2023. In Private Wealth, our teams have brought in $781 million in net new assets year to date, ahead of full year 2023 levels. Credit and debit card spending, including from our newly acquired retail co-brand portfolio, reached $4.7 billion in the Q2, up from $4 billion a year ago. Non-interest expense of $249.1 million for the quarter included pre-tax acquisition expenses of $9.6 million and a reduction of $3.8 million in previously approved FDIC special assessment charges. On an operating basis, non-interest expense increased $2 million linked quarter and included higher processing fees related to higher software subscription costs and various software projects, along with increased bank card expense. Within salaries and benefits expense, typical seasonal reductions in FICA and 401(k) costs, along with a decrease in deferred compensation expense, was partially offset by increased bonus and salary expense related to the timing of merit increases and higher bonus accruals for 2024 year-to-date performance. Excluding the one-time items and seasonal variances, our core expense run rate in the Q2 was approximately $240 million. Finally, our effective tax rate was 20.1% for the quarter, compared to 18.1% in the Q2 of 2023. ... The year-over-year increase was primarily related to lower income on tax-exempt securities and a decrease in tax benefits from stock compensation. For the full year 2024, we would expect a tax rate between 17% and 19%. Now, I'll turn it over to the operator for the Q&A portion of the call. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press Star, followed by one on your telephone keypad. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove your question, please press Star followed by two. Again, to ask a question, press star one. As a reminder, if you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before asking your question. We will pause here briefly as questions are registered. Our first question comes from the line of Jared Shaw with Barclays. Jared, your line is now open. Hey, good morning. Morning, Jared. Morning. Morning. So maybe just to start on the pending acquisition and, you know, any potential restructuring or changes we should expect heading into closing. I'm sort of thinking around, you know, level of brokered deposits, given your good loan to deposit ratio, any securities restructurings that you anticipate either UMBF or Heartland doing. You know, just as we go into closing, any change that we should be thinking about? I'll let Ram take that. I mean, obviously, we can't give you much in the way of guidance there, but Ram can give some color. Yeah. I'll, I'll point out to what we did in the most recent quarter on brokered, CDs and FHLB advances on one of our pages in our investor deck. We have the rolling maturities on page 34 of, remaining FHLBs brokered and, the BTFP program. So other than carefully evaluating them when they come up for renewal, our immediate bias, based on our loan to deposit ratio and our liquidity levels, is probably let them run off. So on, that's on our side. We don't expect any asset side restructuring on the investment portfolio on our book. So no, no, no specific guidance on what Heartland might do. But, for us, other than paying down this, excess liquidity that we have, there's nothing that we're contemplating, Jared. Okay. And then as we look at that, potential runoff there, should we just assume that, you know, what, the cash drifts lower, that securities, you know, maybe you just use the cash flow from that to reduce? Yeah, yeah, generally, we expect the portfolio, the bond portfolio to be relatively stable. But yeah, the excess cash might come down just because, again, you know, given our loan to deposit ratio in the mid-sixties, we can let it, let these deposits go. And obviously, as you see on page 34, these are some of our higher cost deposits or borrowings as well. Yep, yep. Okay. And then on the DDAs, you know, I know obviously each quarter you have some flex or some fluctuations with end of period balances. Any color you can give on sort of trajectory or expectation on DDA, whether it's end of period or average, as we go through the rest of the year? It's probably not much different than the comments we've made in the past, which is that we feel like we're at the bottom of the rotation cycle. You know, we can't predict that really more than give you a backward-looking feelings. And at the end of the day, the way that we come up with feeling that we're close to the bottom of that rotation is the fact that it's pretty clear that rates aren't going up from here. So, and we feel like with our book, most of the rotation took place and took place early in the cycle, as we talked about from the beginning of the cycle, that we would go through it first. On a relative basis, against our periods, we believe we're probably through with most of that rotation, as long as rates look to be going where we all believe them to be going. I would ignore the end of period, the DDA balances, like I always say, right? It's a lot of volatility at quarter end, month end, depending on client and their client activity, so I would not index yourself too much to end of period balances. Though it does help us make more money, right? Yeah. I mean, that's margin end of the quarter, we make money on that as it happens typically at the end of almost every month, it seems. Okay. But so, so you think we could be at a point where we start seeing growth in average, or so, you know, continue to see growth from this quarter in average DDAs? I mean, that's it's hard to predict. I would say that that's just hard to predict whether it's going to grow or not. That's based on sales activities and our ability to bring in new business, which we aren't, we don't forecast publicly. Okay. All right, thanks. And then just finally for me on asset quality, you know, asset quality is great. I was wondering what happened within criticized and classified in the quarter, and then you referenced a model change for CECL. Is that just using a different sort of Moody's baseline or what, I guess, what drove the model change there? Tom will take the first question, we'll turn the second part of that over to Ram. Yeah. Our criticized and classified loans are basically flat quarter-over-quarter. You always have a little bit of movement between, you know, our low pass watch, which actually was down, and that's a pass part of our watch list, but the criticized is flat. Yeah. On the second question about CECL, we did not change our baseline assumptions. We're still 100% indexed to, Moody's baseline. You know, from time to time, we look at our CECL models for performance, for effectiveness, and change and swap out macroeconomic variables, drivers, correlations. So as part of that, we tweaked a couple of our models just to, you know, get a higher provision, get to a 99 basis points coverage ratio. I mean, all in all, on that front, we just take a conservative approach. We feel like it's the right- it's the kind of organization we are, and we believe in a, you know, conservative, strong, healthy reserve. The important part of both your questions, underlying questions is that the excess provision was not because of underlying portfolio trends. It was all quantitatively driven based on changes to CECL models that we have. Yeah, and loan growth. I would just say, just to echo what Tom said related to those things, our, our books really never looked better. You know, we talked about criticized being flat, it's also meager, you know, six basis points. I mean, it, it hardly exists. And then, the charge-offs are what they are. You know, we're... We feel very good about how we manage the company. It's the same team doing the same thing for a long time. We take it very seriously, and we're real, we're real proud of it. Great. Thanks for all that color. Thanks, Jared. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chris McGratty with KBW. Chris, your line is now open. Good morning. Ram, maybe coming back to the margin. How are you? Just come back to the margin for a second. You guys are, you know, 2.5. Heartland's margin looks roughly as of last quarter, about 100 basis points higher. With the bond restructuring from, from them and, and the accretion, I mean, you should be-- I'm trying to get a sense of, like, pro forma margins. So any comment there would be helpful, given, you know, you've, you've talked about, you know, relative neutrality on, on, on the NIM. Yeah, that's a tough question for me to answer just sitting here. I mean, as you know, right, it really depends on what the portfolio marks on acquisition date, whenever that is, happens, right? So there's gonna be a lot of noise related to how that accretes into income. So, I mean, you can do a simple math based on taking their, whatever, 3.73 margin and our 2.52 margin on our earning assets and get to a number, but there's gonna be a lot more noise because of purchase accounting adjustments. So it's really hard for us to sit here. Obviously, you know, they're still running their book and, and, you know, it really depends on what happens to deposit betas and how we manage it after close. So I feel like it's too early to kind of give you a pro forma look at margin, other than the comments that I said, that relatively we should be neutral from an interest rate position on a pro forma basis. I mean, longer term, it's one of the reasons we're doing the transaction, right? I mean, they do have a, a better margin tied to having a smaller business book of loans, which carries a higher yield. They have a more granular deposit base. So, I mean, it's the combination of the way they run their business, longer term, taking the accounting noise of the marks and all that, is part of the reason we're doing the transaction. So longer term, we expect that. Yeah. Okay. In terms of just broader efficiency, I mean, the objective, and you've accomplished it over the years, is operating leverage. If I think about the bank, you know, you've been running kind of low 60s. It would feel, given that momentum, you know, mid-50s would seem, you know, once you get everything in, accreted and integrated, that would be reasonable. But is there anything we're missing in terms of investments now that you're through? In the last quarter, you talked about the investments you're making through to go through 50, but any other guidance, as we look out over the next couple of years? You know, I mean, I probably not going to give you what you're looking for here, but where we remain is focused on being efficient, as we have been. There's always more work to do. I think the combination of our two companies will make us that much stronger. I would say again, just, you know, overall, it is more operating leverage than efficiency. So I think the room for us, the opportunity for us, is to focus more on revenue than it is expense reduction. You know, we've done a lot of that efficiency work to make our systems modernized. We've said in comments before that, you know, we've pushed a big bowling ball through at the front end of the pandemic. We pushed a big bowling ball through the python, right, to get our systems up and ready and modernized. We are more focused today on spend that's focused on customer experience. So more than 50% of our spend is focused there. So, you know, that should benefit both revenue and retention of client and all of that. But in general, I would say, I think our opportunity is on the revenue front, and we're good at that. I think the exciting thing about the Heartland transaction is we'll be able to take their great small business platform and layer our institutional and our C&I on top of their branch network and their footprint. As you're aware, in the way we've modeled all that, there are no representative synergies in what we've produced publicly. So that's, you know, that's all upside and gravy and yet to be seen. So we're very excited about that. And again, I just echo that if you're thinking about operating leverage, our opportunity is more on the revenue side than it's expense. Great. And then if I could, just one more, Ram, on the deposit cost quarter-over-quarter change. Any particular... I heard your prepared remarks about the index deposits, but any particular product that drove the increase? I know there's been some questions from some of the larger banks about sweep deposits, but any impact from that, or any one category you'd call out on the driving the costs? No, the increase in cost on a quarter-over-quarter basis is the pipeline of institutional deposits that we've talked about for the last couple of quarters. So the timing of those coming on board was the driver of the deposit cost. And I'll let Jim answer on the sweep side, but yeah. Well, on the sweep side, I assume you're referring to the healthcare portion. For us, we don't anticipate that being an issue. We're not a fiduciary, as you know. Those deposit transaction accounts for healthcare-related expenses, we don't anticipate that being anything material for us going forward. Perfect. Thank you. And it wasn't a driver in the Q2 either, so no future impact, no current impact. Yep. Got it. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Nathan Race with Piper Sandler. Nathan, your line is now open. Yeah. Hi, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Morning, Nathan. Hey. Just curious just to get an update in terms of what you're seeing across the loan pipeline, and just an overall loan growth expectations over the next couple of quarters. Just curious, based on the pipeline mix, do you expect that to be largely driven by commercial real estate as we saw here in 2Q? I'll take that. Hey, thanks. Or if you look backward, the comments we made in the Q1 are the same we would make in the Q2. So where that CRE balances were coming from, largely they were from existing commitments that were being drawn on. We do continue to book business in CRE, multifamily and industrial, so there remain lots of opportunities there. So as we talked before, it's less, less than it was because we're more focused on great current relationships that we can broaden our relationships with, have deposits and other business with. That, that's the case kind of transitionally coming out of the pandemic, where there was all that excess liquidity in the system. But as far as the pipeline goes, we actually see a very strong Q3, and as you know, we usually only give a look into the next 90 days. As we do that, it's a very strong Q3, and it's coming from across the board, all of our segments. Okay, great. Very helpful. And then just going back to Ram's margin guidance, I think for the back half there, just kind of stable, even if we get a cut at the end of September. Just trying to understand maybe how conservative that guidance is, just given that you seem pretty well matched up in terms of your hard and soft indexed deposits relative to your true floating rate loans, in terms of those percentages. And just as you kind of continue to grow loans at pretty strong clips and use some of the excess liquidity coming off the bond portfolio to support that growth. Yeah, I mean, it's, it's a complicated question. A lot of moving parts, right? The first thing, obviously, is the level of DDAs, like we answered before. I mean, we've said, you know, it could be $10 billion, it could be $9.5 billion, or it could be $10.5 billion. So the overall mix of deposits and timing of some institutional deposits coming in can impact our deposit costs. But, you know, all said, as I said in my prepared comments, we have, you know, close to 48% of our books that are priced at market rates that will move immediately or pretty quickly after the Fed cuts rates, right? And we still have about $1 billion AIDA fixed rate loans that'll continue to reprice higher in the next 12 months because they're at, you know, call it 200 basis points below where current market rates are, so that's a positive as well. And then the third positive, obviously, is what's happening in our securities book with about $1.4 billion of cash flows coming due at 2.54, and getting priced 200-250 basis points higher. So a lot of positive momentum on one side, and then the other side is just, you know, we have 69% or 66% of our loans are variable in nature. 69% of them are tied to SOFR or prime rate. So when that happens, SOFR moves in advance of what the Fed might do, so that might impact loan yields on the other side. So a lot of moving parts, as I'm saying, and obviously, this is true for the next two or three quarters before we layer on the Heartland acquisition. So, I would say given—you know, I'd stick to my original comments that we expect it to be stable. Again, it'll be dictated by what happens to mix of deposits, including DDAs. Loan growth. Loan growth, yeah. Yeah, new, new loans will be accretive to your point here. Yeah. Okay, great. And then you just continue to see kind of good momentum on the institutional fee income. You know, just curious, can you give an update in terms of the opportunities you're seeing across those lines and just kind of any thoughts on just kind of activity levels, and if you can kind of continue to sustain the growth rate that we've seen over the last year or so across institutional? That's another one of my favorite questions. I love our credit quality questions, and I love our institutional growth questions. It's... I'll say a couple of things and let Jim add on if I missed anything since the business lines report to him. But we continue to be positioned very well across the board, but in particular, a couple of things. In AI, alternative investments, and within our Asset Servicing business is very, very strong. The profile is very strong. There's a lot of fund creation, a lot of fundraising going on, a lot of growth within some major clients that we have. We continue to see a really strong pipeline there and then a lot of growth within the customer base. So that is the profile. There continues to be very strong, and I think the disruption in the space with our competitors being bought and sold also has continued to be very helpful. So that's a really strong business with strong profile and a great tailwind. Corporate Trust continues to be fantastically strong, and I think the strength in travel and all that has really pushed a lot of activity in the airline business, which is coming on our CLO business and such that we are building in that space is again have real great tailwinds. We're having a really good time hiring people in the space. And again, just consolidation and hiring has been really great for us in that space. So we continue to feel good about that. The rest of them are all strong. Those, those are some with some real momentum and outsized profiles. Our wealth business, interestingly, also has a really, great profile right now. The sales activity and new generation of assets under management there have, been, been very strong. And, and so that's nicely up, quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year. Anything you might add, Jim? No, the only thing I would add is just as you know, the Corporate Trust business is also a great contributor to our deposit base, and we have the ability to move. If they balloon, we can move it off balance sheet. We have the ability to keep on balance sheet. Really built that out nicely, and we're continuing to invest. So, outlook for those businesses continues to remain very strong. Mm-hmm. And healthcare continues... Like I said, all the businesses are strong. Profiles for all of them are strong, but there's some real momentum in Corporate Trust and AI within this, the whole set. Okay, very helpful. Thank you for that. If I could just ask one more just in terms of thinking about expenses next year. You know, it looks like you guys aren't planning to convert the systems until the Q4 of next year. So just curious, you know, to what extent or what degree of cost saves you guys think you can realize, assuming you close the deal early next year, ahead of the cost save- I'm sorry, ahead of the conversion later in the year? Well, I mean, we'll, as they come in and we execute against them, we'll report on them. It's probably premature to tell you how, when, and it's too early, really, to report on that. But we intend, obviously, to segregate and report on those synergies and savings as they come through every quarter. Yeah. And nothing's changed from our announcement. If you go back, we expected, you know, based on Q1 close and a Q4 conversion, that we would get 40% of that 27.5% cost saves in the first, in the 2025 timeframe, and then everything else in 2026 and beyond. So no change from that perspective as of now, Nate. You'll see, as I said, that so the projections for it all hasn't changed, but you'll see it come through as it comes through. Okay, great. I appreciate the color. Thanks, guys. Thanks,Nat e. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Rodis with Janney. John, your line is now open. Good morning, everybody. Good morning. Just a follow-up, Ram, maybe on fees. I guess the brokerage line item. If we start to see some Fed cuts, can you hold that level, or does that start to decline a little bit? No, that's no, it takes a lot of Fed cuts for that to be impacted on the negative side. You know, it has to be 300 + 400 basis points of cuts before it impacts the 12b-1 money market revenue share. So there's no risk of that. To Jim's earlier point, we're still seeing opportunities to add off balance sheet and maybe even generate some, but I would not expect any near-term impacts because of revenue share going away until the Fed cuts fairly dramatically. And quite frankly, I think the way we see it is the more, if rates come down, activity will go up, so there'll be more activity. So on the margin anyway, as that would hit over time, we'd see more, we'd see more volume also. Okay. Okay, makes sense, Mariner. Thank you. And then just one other on fees, the bank card fees. You know, you're $21 million-$22 million now, and just talking your previous comments about strong trends and stuff. And so you, you feel, you know, that's up from, you know, $18 million-$19 million a quarter last year. So this sort of new level of $21 million-$22 million seems appropriate going forward? Yeah, one of the biggest drivers, so obviously, purchase volumes, even organically, have grown up nicely, right? We used to be at $3.5 billion of purchase volumes every quarter. A lot of it is driven by healthcare. Now, we have a lot of momentum, as you heard from, you know, our fee income lines on commercial, where purchase volume is growing strongly. And the biggest catalyst in the Q2, as $115 million of co-branded card balances that we acquired. So that new business generated about, you know, gross $70 million of purchase volumes, fees of net of interchange or net interchange fees of about $500,000. So that's part of the organic and inorganic growth drivers for us, but we feel pretty good at the higher level. It can go up and down from quarter to quarter based on timing of, you know, incentives from the network or other things, but generally, we feel like the momentum is positive. We also had a couple large new relationships on the institutional side that had card relationships that are really starting to drive some big volume there. So I would say it's up from here, not neutral. You know what I mean? The trends are upward sloping. Okay. Thanks, guys. Thanks, John. ... Thank you. Before our next question, reminder, if you would like to ask a question, press star one on your telephone keypad. Our next question comes from the line of Timur Braziler with Wells Fargo. Timur, your line is now open. Hey, Timur. Hi, good morning. Morning! I wanted to follow up just on the margin outlook for Q3 as it pertains to the bond book. It seems at least like much of the bond growth occurred later in the quarter, and the amount of repricing was elevated in Q2 compared to what's coming online over the next four quarters. I'm just wondering how much of that repricing took place in the back end of the quarter, and if that's not more of a tailwind as we go into Q3 for margin? No, the back end balance increase that you're seeing, as we footnoted in one of our pages, time to time, especially at month end, as we described earlier, there's a lot of collateral needs for trust deposits and institutional type deposits. So we end up buying those, so those may be inflating what you're looking at. But generally, across the three months and a quarter, we're always looking at every quarter to whether we want to reinvest based on our loan-to-deposit ratio, pipeline, and all that. So I would not expect a tailwind because of the late quarter purchases. I mean, again, this is just to satisfy collateral needs over the last two days of the quarter and the first two days of the following or last two days of the month and the following two days. There's no tailwind to be expected in the Q3 from that. Okay, great. And then maybe a follow-up on the Heartland deal. I'm just wondering, you know, the fact that you're essentially acquiring 10 smaller institutions versus one larger one, is that an opportunity, as those are kind of consolidated together and brought under one general operating model? Or is that a near-term risk as that consolidation kind of maybe offsets some of the planned benefits, at least in the near term of the deal closing? That's a great question, and one. It's really one of the exciting things about executing this transaction. Really one of the things that excited us is that they, you know, started a journey two years ago, basically to set themselves up to look like us over the next, you know, five and 10 years. And this acquisition just accelerates all that work. So they've, they've done—I said, I think early on in one of our calls, you know, they, they planted the seeds and, and, tilled the soil, and we get to harvest. So they've done all the hard work, they've consolidated the systems, and, you know, we, we get to come in and sort of layer in all the, all the things that we do. And so I guess I would say not a lot of risk to that, really more opportunity to leverage the work that they've already done. So we're pretty excited about it. We get to just kind of come in and, you know, like I said, leverage the work they've done. So don't see any risks there, really all opportunity. Great. Thanks for that call, Mariner. Thanks, Timur. Thank you. There are no questions registered at this time, so I will pass the call back over to the management team for any closing remarks. Thank you, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Again, you can always follow up with investor relations at 816-860-7106. Thanks for your interest in UMB, and have a great day. That concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.