Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the UNFI first quarter fiscal 2026 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, again, press star one. Thank you. I'd now like to turn the call over to Steve Bloomquist, Vice President of Investor Relations. You may begin. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on UNFI's first quarter fiscal 2026 earnings conference call. By now, you should have received a copy of the earnings release from this morning. The press release and earnings presentation, which management will speak to, are available under the Investor section of the company's website at www.unfi.com. We have also included a supplemental disclosure file in Microsoft Excel with key financial information. Joining me for today's call are Sandy Douglas, our Chief Executive Officer, and Matteo Tarditi, our President and Chief Financial Officer. Sandy and Matteo will provide a business update, after which we will take your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that comments made by management during today's call may contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include plans, expectations, estimates, and projections that might involve significant risks and uncertainties. These risks are discussed in the company's earnings release and SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. I'd like to point out that during today's call, management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Definitions and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our press release and the end of our earnings presentation. I'd now ask you to turn to slide six of our presentation as I turn the call over to Sandy. Thanks, Steve, and thank you, everyone, for joining us this morning. In the first quarter of fiscal 2026, UNFI delivered solid results, including adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow meaningfully above prior year levels, while net leverage declined approximately one turn compared to the prior year quarter. Importantly, we delivered these results amidst an operating environment that remains highly dynamic. Our first quarter net sales performance was driven by sustained natural and organic product growth, new business projects, and strong retail execution across our customer base. Positive sales in our natural product segment largely offset declines in our conventional product segment, consistent with our expectations as part of our accelerated network optimization efforts, most notably at Allentown, which have proceeded ahead of schedule. As we improve our network, we're focused on continuing to improve service levels for our customers and suppliers in a growing $90 billion target market and on further increasing our long-term profitability. Our adjusted EBITDA growth in the first quarter continued to be driven by improving execution, effectiveness, and efficiency across the business. This reflects actions taken within our value delivery office to help support gross margins as well as continued progress managing shrink. Free cash flow results improved by over $100 million compared to last year's first quarter, even as we took necessary steps to stock up on the inventory our customers need in advance of the high-volume holiday selling season that is now well underway. This performance enabled us to both improve fill rates and reduce net leverage sequentially compared to the end of fiscal 2025 and from prior year levels. As a result of our solid Q1 performance, we're firmly on track to achieve our full-year outlook, and we remain focused on executing our strategy, adding value for our customers and suppliers while becoming a more effective and efficient company. During the first quarter, we continue to make progress in both areas. I'll start with how we're adding value for our customers and suppliers. At UNFI, we aim to do more than safely receive, store, and transport food. We're working to bring our customers the products, insights, programs, and services that will help them execute their strategies and successfully differentiate themselves in a highly competitive environment. We know this environment is increasingly challenging, especially for traditional grocers. This is why we aren't stopping with what we can do for our customers and suppliers today. We're focused on what we can do to help them succeed for years to come. Our commercial organization is working to revamp and strengthen our merchandising capabilities as a competitive advantage for our customers because we believe tailored merchandising and competitive pricing on key items is critical to helping retailers more effectively differentiate and compete. This focus also helps our suppliers successfully build their brands across the diversified 30,000+ retail locations that we serve. A critical part of our broader merchandising capability is supported by our private brands portfolio. During the quarter, we appointed a new leader for this business with deep knowledge of how private brands can help retailers differentiate and drive value for consumers. We also continue taking action to improve the experience for independent customers and emerging suppliers who are critical to the vitality of our industry. In fact, an early focus of our Lean Management Kaizen workshops has been to troubleshoot some of the areas that suppliers have told us are important to them, such as time to shelf. Following a recent Kaizen continuous improvement workshop, we took swift action to improve item setup forms and processes to streamline the new item setup process. This type of action not only directly helps our suppliers but also our customers by ensuring that they get access to innovative products that their shoppers want. Turning to our focus on improving effectiveness and efficiency, in the first quarter, we took additional steps on our operational roadmap to pair advanced supply chain technologies with processes and capabilities that empower UNFI associates to champion operational excellence. We recently deployed the supply chain technology RELEX across about half of our distribution network, with the second half expected to be completed by fiscal year end. This solution is helping us partner with our customers and suppliers to make smarter procurement decisions by using an AI-based platform to predict demand, avoid waste, and reduce out-of-stocks. It is helping to deliver improved fill rates and inventory effectiveness as we expected, and we anticipate further benefits as we complete the rollout this year. At the same time, we continue to scale Lean Daily Management across our distribution network, with 34 DCs now onboarded through first quarter's end. In these DCs, we continue to see encouraging improvements in our KPIs for safety, quality, delivery, and cost, all as a result of empowering our associates to see and solve problems faster and more effectively. Together, RELEX and Lean are driving effectiveness and efficiency across our network. Our customer fill rates have improved and are now trending above fiscal 2024 and 2025 levels on average. We still have work to do, but we see even more opportunities to improve as we continue to scale these initiatives in the months ahead. During the first quarter, we also continued to optimize our network following the actions we took last fiscal year to streamline parts of our footprint while also strategically investing to support future growth. These actions were completed at an accelerated pace relative to our initial expectations. Our optimization efforts are enabling us to serve customers and suppliers through strategically located facilities with broad assortments while removing redundant and wasteful costs. These actions have enabled us to continue to make network improvements and contributed meaningfully to our improved results. During the first quarter, we ramped operations at our new automated natural product distribution center in Sarasota, Florida, which is expected to help address strong demand in that area. By combining the power of an optimized portfolio with the right mix of technology, processes, and people, we are building a more responsive and resilient supply chain to support customer and supplier needs today and into the future. At next week's Investor Day, we'll provide a closer look at the key capabilities that we're building to add more value for customers and suppliers and continue to drive effectiveness and efficiency across our business. We also look forward to giving everyone a chance to hear directly from several of the talented UNFI leaders who are leading this important work. Together, all of us at UNFI remain focused on becoming the food retail industry's most valued partner. Our first quarter performance reinforces our confidence in our ability to continue to create sustainable long-term value for our customers, suppliers, associates, and shareholders. With that, let me turn it over to Matteo to provide more detail about our first quarter performance. Matteo? Thank you, Sandy, and good morning, everyone. Our first quarter results reflect our focus on building capabilities to better support our customers while simultaneously improving profitability and free cash flow, resulting in meaningful progress on our deleveraging efforts. We're also firming our annual outlook for all key financial metrics. Today, I will provide additional insight into our first quarter results, our financial position, and capital structure in our fiscal 2026 outlook. With that, let's review our Q1 results. Starting with slide eight, our first quarter sales came in at $7.8 billion, roughly flat to last year. This includes natural segment growth of 11%, reflecting strong unit growth, which outperformed the market. This growth, as Sandy mentioned, was driven by the performance of our customers, some new business projects for existing customers, as well as the continued secular strength in our natural, organic, and specialty products. In conventional, as we anticipated and previously discussed, sales declined about 12%, primarily driven by our accretive transition out of our Allentown distribution center, which was completed ahead of our expectations. While this move pressured the top line, it supports improved profitability and free cash flow. Overall, wholesale inflation was about 3%. Unit volumes declined about 5%, driven primarily by network optimization, and mix was positive during the quarter. In retail, total sales fell 5% in the quarter, partly due to store closures over the past 12 months, reflecting our strategic decision to strengthen the store network and improve future free cash flow. Same store sales declined 3%, but we are optimistic about the impact that David Best and his strengthened leadership team will have on this business. Moving to slide nine, let's review profitability drivers in the quarter. Our gross margin rate in the first quarter was 13.4%, up 20 basis points versus the prior year quarter. This rate represents continued progress and execution to optimize our portfolio, our event supplier programs, and higher levels of temporary procurement gains resulting from vendor price increases. Our operating expense rate was 12.7% of net sales compared to 12.9% last year. This improvement reflects the benefit of our effectiveness and efficiency initiatives driven by our value delivery office, network optimization, including continued strategic automation investments, and acceleration of Lean Daily Management across UNFI. In addition, throughput, a key indicator of supply chain productivity measured by cases moving through the DCs over an hour, increased by over 2% compared to last year's first quarter and by nearly 10% from Q1 2024. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter was $167 million, up nearly 25% year- over- year. On a rate basis, adjusted EBITDA was 2.1% of net sales, up 40 basis points year- over- year. All in, adjusted EPS for Q1 was $0.56 compared to $0.16 last year. This was driven by higher profitability, including the benefit of lower net interest and depreciation expense, partially offset by a higher tax rate. Turning to slide 10, free cash flow in Q1 was a use of $54 million, which was an improvement of about $105 million compared to last year's first quarter. This was the result of higher adjusted EBITDA, more efficient working capital investment, and lower levels of year-over-year capital spending. We continue to expect capital investments to accelerate as we move further into the year based on the expected project schedule. The free cash flow performance in Q1, coupled with the higher adjusted EBITDA, enabled us to lower our net leverage ratio sequentially to 3.2 times and by one full turn compared to this time last year. Historically, we have seen net leverage increase as we move from Q4 to Q1 and build inventory heading into the holiday season. However, our focus on customer service combined with improved procurement processes and early benefits of RELEX have led to higher average fee rates, while we have continued to reduce net leverage. With the strong first quarter performance, we remain confident that we will further reduce net leverage to our target of below 2.5 times by the end of the fiscal year as we enter the seasonally higher free cash flow generation quarters. Flipping to slide 11, we continue to deepen Lean practices to drive benefits across safety, quality, delivery, and cost. We have now implemented Lean Daily Management in 34 DCs as of the end of the first quarter, a sequential increase of six facilities in the quarter. We're actively working to eliminate waste and improve distribution center effectiveness and efficiency, all driven by our strategy of adding value to our customers and suppliers. As Sandy stated, we continue to focus on building enhanced capabilities, including customer stewardship, merchandising, supply chain, and technology. This builds on work done over the past few years to better understand the needs of all customers and suppliers and will be an important part of the content at next week's Investor Day. Looking at slide 12, our performance in Q1 keeps us solidly on track to deliver our full year outlook for fiscal 2026. To review, our guidance ranges and increases compared to fiscal 2025 include sales of $31.6 billion-$32 billion. This includes the year-over-year loss of sales from our transition out of Allentown, which will improve profitability and free cash flow but suppress the growth in consolidated net sales by about 3%. Adjusted EBITDA of $630 million-$700 million, representing a year-over-year increase of about 20% and an average annual growth rate of close to 15% at the midpoint relative to our reported fiscal 2024 results. This implies about 35 basis points of margin expansion at the midpoint of our outlook. Adjusted EPS range of $1.50-$2.30 per share, an increase of about $1.20 per share at the midpoint compared to last year. Our outlook for capital spending remains at $250 million, reflecting our focus on safety, modernization, and continued prioritization of investment for growth. Finally, our free cash flow expectations remain at approximately $300 million. We will continue to prioritize reducing net debt to improve our net leverage ratio to 2.5 times or less by year-end. While it's still early in the year, we remain confident in delivering our plan as we move through the balance of fiscal 2026. As highlighted on slide 13, the strength of our customers and a focus on continuing to improve execution across our operations, including the benefits from Lean in our network optimization efforts, have led to a solid start to fiscal 2026. We are encouraged by our sustained progress on improving free cash flow and deleveraging our balance sheet, with our net leverage ratio decreasing by one turn versus this time last year. We remain committed to our strategy of adding value to our customers and suppliers while making UNFI more effective and efficient as a business partner. As we suggested on our last call, our goal this fiscal year is to accelerate the momentum, and we are on a path of doing just that. We look forward to sharing more with you at next week's Investor Day. With that, Operator, please open the line for questions. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you'd like to withdraw your question, simply press star one again. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Your first question today comes from the line of John Heinbockel from Guggenheim. Your line is open. Hey, Sandy, two related questions on natural growth. Right? Growing 10%, market's growing, right, maybe mid-single digit. Can you talk to drop size, right, or new account distribution versus existing growth? Is that sort of a 50/50 split, right, drop size up mid-single digit as well? You also mentioned fill rates. I know the fill rates in natural are not where they need to be, some of that's structural, but how big of an opportunity is that? Yeah. I think, John, good morning. I would say the general trend in our drop sizes has been positive, largely because a lot of growth has happened with some of our larger customers who are at the same time, and this is the premise of your question, giving us more to do. I think as that dynamic happens, obviously, that makes us more efficient down through the line. At the heart of it, it's strong growth, and it drops to EBITDA. The fill rate issue? Yeah. Fill rate's been solid, and we're very heartened by it, actually. We've taken a number of steps to improve fill rate. It's obviously a key metric to our customers. Between the reintroduction of technology and the new implementation of RELEX on a bed of Lean Daily Management, and then driven by a more localized management structure that was put in place a couple of years ago, it's giving us sequential improvement in fill rates, 25% versus 24%, and then this year, 26% versus 25%. We continue to see opportunity to improve in that area, and it's an area that's very important to us and to our customers. My quick follow-up is, if I look at EBITDA margin in the conventional business, right, this quarter is up over 100 basis points, right, north of 2%. How do you look at the potential of that business, right? It may not grow, but how much more profitable can it be? Yeah, John, good morning. If you think about conventionally in Q1, the EBITDA reflected the benefit of the accretive network optimization, the supplier programs, and then a little bit of temporary procurement gains that, again, we continue to view as secondary and temporary to our strategy. The conventional outlook for adjusted EBITDA for the rest of the year largely reflects the network optimization, the growth of the supplier's funds, the continuous work that we do on shrink, and then the initiatives that we have deployed between Lean Daily Management and indirect cost management, all kind of helping on the operating expenses and the leverage. Q1 may be a little bit heightened by some temporary procurement gains, but in general, our strategy remains consistent of creating new capabilities to keep our customers competitive, merchandising, professional services brands, while working in the benefits of the network optimization and the Lean Daily Management and indirect cost actions. John, just one sort of strategic overlay there around EBITDA margin as we look ahead. Our view is that the opportunities, and in fact, the mandate to create value for customers in this environment, is a very long-term opportunity for us to continue to get better, whether that's execution, whether it's services, whether it's programs, whether it's merchandising. If you look at our cost base, we have a huge amount of cost related to what we do, and we see a very long runway of continuous improvement opportunity there. We would expect EBITDA margins to continue to edge up in the effectiveness and efficiency areas as well. Thank you. Your next question comes from a line of Ed Kelly from Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. This is John Parke on for Ed. Thanks for taking our question. I guess just kind of given the gross margin strength in the quarter, can you kind of talk about the sustainability of that and maybe parse out how big of a benefit the network optimization efforts were in Q1? Yeah. Good morning, John. The gross margin rate at the last point of quarter was 13.6% versus last year of 13.3%. We were up about 30 basis points. The key drivers within the gross profit growth, obviously, we had strong natural growth that brings gross profit and operating leverage based on their efficient business model. We had supplier's funds and shrink continuing to help and accrete within the gross profit. We had some level of procurement gains that, again, we continue to view as temporary and secondary, both in our financial construction and in the strategic partnership with our suppliers. The EBITDA of $167 million, if you consider the large driver of productivity, the growth in natural, is basically a fair representation of the quarter in our run rate. You can think about the $167 million as a normalized kind of EBITDA for the quarter. Even if we had temporary procurement gains in a $32 billion business in a given quarter, you have a number of puts and takes. That $167 million is a good kind of recurring run rate that we plan to sustain. Relative to incremental opportunities for gross profit, the capabilities that we're going to discuss next week at Investor Day between merchandising, professional digital services, brands, all help keeping our customers competitive, strengthening the relationship with our suppliers, but also helping on mix, which is an important component of our gross profit. Got it. Just kind of switching gears a little bit, can you talk about the competitive environment at retail for both conventional and natural? Are you seeing any changes out there more recently? At 200,000 ft, one of the fun things about being in our seat in the industry is we get to see a lot of retailers work their magic. This is no exception at this time. I mean, clearly, given the stress that a significant percentage of the consumer base is feeling right now, discount is very competitive and compelling. That has stimulated a lot of innovation in retail, and we see it across our customer base, whether it's in the pure play, natural, and the organic folks or customers who are beginning to rethink what they do to continue to bring different, better, and special offers in their market, community-based retailers, multicultural-focused retailers. If you took the part of the industry that's innovating and differentiating and winning, they're growing very strongly. It really is a market-by-market, customer-by-customer strategic and operational battle. There are lots of winners. There are people that are challenged as well. I think from our end, at least, we're busy trying to figure out how to help them win. It is very competitive out there, but that's creating a lot of innovation. We continue to view the broader industry as very healthy. Great. Best of luck, guys. Your next question comes from the line of Mark Carden from UBS. Your line is open. Good morning. Thanks so much for taking the question. You continue to generate quite strong growth in natural organic. How would conventional have shaken out the Allentown transition? It sounds like the impact there may have been more than expected, just given you concluded ahead of your expectations. What are you seeing with respect to the health of the consumer in both your natural organic segments of the business? Good morning, Mark. Yeah. What I would say is the lion's share of our weakness in conventional is because of network optimization. Obviously, the Allentown exit is the largest factor there, but there's been other tweaking across the country. Beyond that, in conventional, it's been a bumpy quarter for the consumer with the shutdown creating general sentiment challenges with SNAP delayed for a while, created some issues in those weeks. Now retailers are coming back as that all comes back online. Very competitive in conventional, and it sets up a mandate for us. It's the principal kind of North Star of our merchandising reboot is to figure out how to get our customers in a place where they can be competitive in any scenario. In the natural environment, obviously, been very strong growth in that segment across the different retailers, the largest of which all are our customers, and we're getting the opportunity to serve them. We continue to believe over the long term that the natural business, as an industry, is a mid-single digit grower, and we hope to be able to compete and support the retailers that are competing in that environment. That's great. As a follow-up, just at this stage, have you guys seen much incremental customer attrition following the cyber attack? You guys seem to be weathering it quite well last quarter. Just how was it compared to what you may have expected at the time of your last quarter call? Yeah. Mark, I do not think it is any different. My answer would be exactly the same as I answered it last quarter. We had one southern customer that joined us, and we had one upper Midwest customer leave us. I think the core answer is that we and our entire network, our sales, our merchandising, our supply chain teams are busy serving customers as well as they possibly can. We continue to manage through a couple of situations there. As far as customer retention, we have been extremely fortunate, and we are working very, very hard to earn that and hope to continue to be the best choice for customers going forward. Thanks so much. Good luck, guys. Thanks. Your next question comes from the line of Kelly Bania from BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open. Thanks for taking our questions. Matteo, just to follow up first on the procurement gains, I guess that helped Q1 a little bit. If I heard you right, there's nothing there in the plan going forward. I am wondering if you could just confirm I heard that right. Can you help us understand, did those procurement gains drive some upside to your internal plan for the quarter? Was that specific to any categories that you can help us just understand what was happening there? Yeah. Good morning, Kelly. Answering the first part of your question, we have not modeled any procurement gains in our 2026 or 2027 outlook. We continue to describe those as temporary and secondary. They happen in the first quarter. As I was saying before, in a given quarter, we have puts and takes. Some of the upside from the procurement gains were offset by other dynamics. Relative to kind of how we are thinking about the procurement gains, our strategy is always to work with the suppliers and build strong relationships with them, making sure that through that kind of strategic partnership, we keep our customers competitive, keep our prices low, stable, and predictable. We do not rely on procurement gains in order to achieve our financial targets. Again, we continue to view them as temporary. Relative to specific categories, it's been a little bit of a combination of many. As you can imagine, partly related to tariffs, partly related to kind of the general inflation, that is still in the 2.5%-3% range, so modestly up versus 2025. Okay. That's very helpful. I was also wondering if I could just ask a couple of questions about top line on the two sides of the wholesale business. First, on conventional, I guess excluding that optimization, it looks like sales were down in the mid-single digit range. You called out some of the factors, I guess, going on during the quarter. I guess, can you continue to hit your targets with that magnitude of kind of core sales pressure in conventional? Are you seeing or hearing suppliers in those categories becoming more promotional to help maybe drive some volume in those categories? Yeah. Kelly, this is Sandy. What I would say is the general environment in conventional, get out of our optimization, which is the large majority of our decline, by the way. More of the decline than I think your question framed. Be that as it may, there is pressure in conventional, and it is seen broadly. The major source of that pressure comes from the consumer situation, the bumpiness with SNAP, and then the efficacy of a discount positioning in that environment. Retailers are responding to that in obviously different ways. If you were to draw broad themes, it is to respond by getting more competitive on key value items to start, for sure. Secondly, it is to look at product assortments and seek to innovate in a way that fits the retailer's positioning and minimizes comparability. The third area is kind of the secret sauce of the retailer, whether it's food service or customer service or community or local sourcing or whatever it might be. You can see evidence of that formula working in conventional across the country. You can just think of the retailers that might fit that, many of whom are customers of ours in one way or another. We see a great opportunity to try to continue to help retailers break that code and manage through the kind of consumer stress, which, as it abates, will continue to favor them, particularly those who've executed that formula well in their businesses. Thank you, Sandy. Can I just also ask about the natural side? Obviously, very strong there. Just wondering if you could comment a little bit more about how widespread that growth is. You talked about getting kind of more business with large customers. Are you seeing kind of more broad-based adoption of natural and organic? There have been some signs of a slowdown. It seems like you have a different point of view there. Wondering if you could just elaborate. Sure. I think very much like the conventional business, it's a retailer-by-retailer story. Our business, as you know, is slightly different than just a pure mirror of retail. We also do project work. We do market entry services as an example of project work. Sometimes we have business in a particular channel or with a given customer that might be temporary as they make a strategic transition in their business. If you look at our report, you'll see strong growth. You'll see a number of customers performing very well. You see a component of it that is project-related, where we're helping customers execute against short-term initiatives. You will see the ongoing secular health of the natural, organic, and specialty categories. The way we think about it is that the category, based on the same information you all have, looks like it's a mid-single digit grower. We'd like to believe that we'll punch our weight strongly in that industry going forward. Certainly, our performance in the last quarter and over the last year and a half or so because of the project work we've been doing has been very strong. Kelly and Sandy, let me maybe after two or three questions on sales, helicopter up and say a couple of words on how we're thinking about the sales outlook. In Q1, sales were roughly flat compared to the prior year. The midpoint of our outlook, $31.6 billion-$32 billion, is also flat. Q1 has been consistent with the outlook. The outlook reflects the expectation that the underlying natural growth for the year will be similar to the long-term industry average, which is MSD. Now, when we think about the rest of the year, in Q2, in conventional, we'll have the full top line impact as well as the full adjusted EBITDA benefits of the Allentown, Fort Wayne, Billings, and Bismarck optimizations versus Q2 2025 when we were adjusting the early innings of the network optimization. When we think about the third quarter, we will be ramping down some of the critical customer project base that we started 12 months ago, but we know that also can ramp up very quickly and that is part of the solution that we offer to our customers and how we create value. In the fourth quarter, obviously, we have an easier comp as we will have the no-repeat tailwind for the $400 million of cyber-related losses. It is a full-year framework. We do not guide by quarter, but wanted to offer a little bit of a helicopter view on how we are thinking about the next nine months through that kind of framework of flat and midpoint. Very helpful. Thank you so much. Your next question comes from a line of Chuck Cerankosky from Northc oast Research. Your line is open. Good morning, everyone. Great quarter. As we look at the margin improvement going forward that we anticipate, what's realistically left in the shrink area and where might that come from? Is it lower inventories leaving less spoilage, less breakage? Can you talk about that in some detail, please? Hey, good morning, Chuck. On margins, the current outlook calls for 35 basis points of margin expansion in 2026. If you think about 2024 through 2027, it is about 60 basis points of margin expansion. That is really rooted into large productivity programs, the benefit of the network optimization, the supplier programs. There is still a contribution from shrink. As you think about 2025 to 2024, shrink was a very important contributor. In the end, our goal is to continue to improve and eliminate waste. I mean, it is a main principle of Lean that is now at 34 or 49 distribution centers. There will be a relentless effort on reducing shrink. We closed pretty well at the end of the first quarter. We are pleased with the progress. We will probably see less of a large dollar contribution compared to other productivity programs and some of the capabilities that will help on mix. Our focus on eliminating waste and inventory-related waste will continue for a very long time. All right. Thank you. Your next question comes from a line of Leah Jordan from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning. Sandy, you talked about new business projects in the prepared remarks. It sounds like you're doing more with your largest customer. Just seeing if we could get an update on your new business pipeline. What are the opportunities between new versus existing at this point? I think, ultimately, more importantly, how do you view the competitive environment for winning new business across wholesale? What are the differences really between conventional versus natural in the current landscape? Thank you. Sure. Let me comment on projects and then just to make sure that I'm being precise in the way I'm defining them and distinguishing them from general pipeline-type either expansion with an existing customer or a new customer. The way we talk about projects is imagine a retailer is moving into a new region and they're building a DC. They might hire us to be their distribution for a couple of years. That's a project. We know it's a beginning and we know it's an end. We're happy to facilitate their strategy and happy to earn that business, assuming it's profitable. We would call that a project. Whereas a customer might hire us to start to handle their culinary or a different category that we haven't carried before, that would be pipeline. Obviously, a new banner would be a pipeline expansion. Just getting the definitions right. From our perspective, the pipeline is strong on both natural and conventional. What I would say to you that's enhanced is we have a very disciplined review process where we assess all of those programs and deals for profitability, for sustainability, for operational sensitivity, and for value for the customer. We are very disciplined. We do not pursue business for business' sake. That is what our network optimization is unwinding right now. There is a highly disciplined underwriting process that our presidents and Matteo very carefully review. Pipelines are strong on both sides. Our basis of competition typically is when it is a product, a service, or a program that helps the customer differentiate as opposed to price for price's sake. We have to be very competitive, make no mistake. Our customers expect that. We try to bring a whole package and that allows for us to have a win-win. It fits the customer because some of the things that we can do, we do better. We are continuing to work, as we will explain next week at Investor Day. We see a significant opportunity to continue to improve the offer. We will be talking about that next week. That's very helpful. Thank you. One thing that stood out in the deck, you really were highlighting a refocused effort, it seemed, on private label. There seems to be new leadership there. Just seeing if you can provide more detail on your updated strategy. What are the opportunities in natural versus conventional for that category? What are the points of differentiation you're providing? I don't think we've had an update. Where are percent of sales on private label today as well? Thank you. Okay. Thanks, Leah. Yeah. I mean, broadly speaking, you all see it. Natural brands are strong and strengthening relative to the whole store for consumer value reasons. Increasingly, there's opportunities to build them across good, better, and best. All three tiers. We did strengthen our leadership there with a veteran of private brands from another wholesaler who, she's absolutely outstanding, and we're thrilled to have her join the team. We see a significant opportunity to increase penetration here. Our penetration of private brands is not at industry levels, and we see it as an opportunity for growth and an opportunity to create more value for customers. We're very focused on achieving it. It's a long-term opportunity. Again, I'll say this a few times today, but we'll talk more about it next week. That's the long and short of it. It's a great opportunity across good, better, and best, and we're working on all three. The other thing that I would say for a little more color is the portfolio of private brands is segmented. It's not the same portfolio going into a traditional grocery store as it is to a natural store. There's opportunities on both sides. Great. Thank you. Your next question comes from a line of Scott Mushkin from R5 Capital. Your line is open. Thanks, guys. Appreciate the time to ask some questions. I wanted to, we've been spending a lot of time on sales, and I think the reason is you guys, especially on the organic, natural organic side, surprised the heck out of a lot of people. It seems like the incremental growth is organic growth with what the industry is doing. I think we all have seen it slow across even your customers, more store openings, winning more business. I think you've talked about incremental projects. Taking the other side of the sales slowdown idea, if the industry were to. Sorry about that. If the. Accelerate again, could we expect your business to accelerate? Scott, I'm going to paraphrase the question because we lost you for a couple of seconds there. You were commenting that you'd seen the industry slow down, and you're wondering if our sales would accelerate if it accelerated. Do you want to rephrase that one more time? Yeah. I mean, I guess what I'd say is we've seen some of your customers slow down their organic growth, their comp. Your business moved, I think, high or surprised us, probably surprised the street. What I was wondering is taking the other side of it, could we actually see your sales accelerate in natural organic if the growth rate returns to some of these customers on a comp basis? Yeah. Let's try to look at the pieces. We don't give guidance by division. What we said earlier is that our external analysis points to kind of mid-single digit growth in the natural organic and specialty categories. How I might look at that if I was trying to think about UNFI's growth is how would UNFI's customers tend to perform against that average? How effective is UNFI at doing more to serve those customers or gaining more customers? From a print of + 10%, which has a significant amount of project work that will annualize in the next couple of months, you can develop your own forecast. What we would say about our business is we continue to expect to compete and perform strongly in those categories. All right. Perfect. The other question is turning now towards the conventional side. I think, Sandy, you mentioned that it's gotten tougher. We've seen that. Our research has seen that. That also is spurring more promos from manufacturers. Just walk us out like 6 to 12 months and say the industry continues, the conventional side continues to deteriorate from a competitive standpoint. How does that impact your business? I mean, obviously, it would slow the sales a little bit. Overall, how does that impact your business if we kind of take the line down, continue to take it down, and the competitive environment deteriorates further? Scott, first, let's talk about the pieces of the industry because I think this is really important. It is a well-documented, well-talked-about fact that the biggest four have been taking share for decades in the so-called conventional part of the industry. What doesn't get talked about, though, is there aren't only two piles of customers in that segment. There's many piles. If you take a third pile and say, "I'm going to put the innovative retailers who've been aggressive in keeping their center store costs down, that have been innovative relative to assortment and avoiding unnecessary comparability with the big four, and then have their own secret sauce, whether it's food service, prepared food, great customer service, local associates, whatever it might be," and you put that group in a pile, they're outperforming everybody. Our strategic work is first and foremost to try to be the partner choice for that pile. That is why we took our addressable market from $150 billion down to $90 billion, as we just said. We are probably not going to be good at folks that are just trying to find a drayage partner to try to duke it out on price alone. We have to be sharp on price, but we have to be good in helping customers implement a more, let's call it, differentiated strategy. I would encourage everybody to look at the industry in a more segmented way. The next comment I would make relative to promotions, and this is the commentary about merchandising. We are going to talk about this a little bit next week. We actually think that, as I mentioned when I went through that set of things that we're seeing the winners do, wholesale-supported retailers need more help and need to work together with their wholesaler to negotiate better costs relative to EDLP. It's not just promotional dollars. That game is not working very effectively for a lot of people. That's not to say it doesn't work for anybody. Our merchandising effort now is going to work backwards from the shelf and say, "What conditions have to be there so that our customers have a credible center of the store? And what programming is there that suppliers might want to invest in because they do with the big four? How can we get them to invest through to help and continue to build a robust supermarket channel?" Lots of work going on there. Our macro trends, but within them, there are winners, and it's a sizable chunk. That's a lot of what's on our work desk right now, some of which we'll be able to give updates on, work in progress updates next week in New York. Perfect. Just to clarify, it was a great answer. I guess your expectations if the industry continues to deteriorate, you guys should be okay. Is that a good summation of what you just said to me? I do not want to accept the premise. I believe that in tough times, people that partner with an industry have to step up. That is as far as I will go in my crystal ball. All right. See you guys next week. Look forward to it. Your final question today comes from a line of Peter Saleh from BTIG. Your line is open. Great. Thanks for taking all the questions. I just had one question on capital allocation. I know you're at 3.2 turns now on leverage, and that's down pretty substantially from last year. And well on your way to two and a half turns by the end of this year. How should we be thinking about or modeling out your capital allocation strategy, capital returns going forward? When you get to two and a half, will you continue to focus on deleveraging, or should we consider more capital returns to shareholders? How do we think about that going forward? Thanks. Hey, good morning, Peter. 2026, our goal is to deleverage to 2.5 times or lower. In the last earnings call, we also affirmed that in 2027, we want to deleverage to two times or less. Our capital allocation and our application of the free cash flow that we generate remains solely focused on deleveraging and reducing debt. If you think about the cash performance in the quarter, we improved by about $100 million year-over-year, combination of better EBITDA and better working capital management. For the rest of the year, we continue to see the EBITDA at the midpoint, obviously accreting more than $100 million for the full year. That implied math would be a 2.5 times, would be basically a free cash flow performance closer to $225 million-$250 million, and we have an outlook at $300 million. There is clearly multiple ways to achieve the 2.5 turns and less. The same carries over into 2027, where, again, we plan to print another $65 million of EBITDA at the current outlooks and generate another $300 million of free cash flow. The only comment that I wanted to make is that in the first quarter, CapEx was low by design. In the end, we focused on regular maintenance and some of the technology investments. We have a very tight monthly steering committee with the business presidents that review both the new projects but also the cadence of spending. Within that $250 million outlook, we still have all the projects and all the schedule lined up to consume that envelope in the usual three-partition of maintenance and modernization, safety, technology, and then automation and growth investments. Thank you very much. That concludes our question and answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Sandy Douglas for closing remarks. Thank you, Operator. We remain focused on executing our strategy to add value for our customers and suppliers while becoming a more effective and efficient company. As we continue to strengthen our operational execution, we're steadily improving our service levels, profitability, free cash flow, and capital structure. We have a long runway of opportunity to continue improving in these areas while building capabilities to help our customers and suppliers differentiate, compete, and grow profitably in a dynamic marketplace. We look forward to providing more details on our journey to create long-term shared value for all our stakeholders at our investor day next week. To our customers and suppliers, we thank you for your continued partnership, collaboration, and support. We look forward to serving you during this busy holiday season. To the UNFI associates listening today, our thanks for all that you continue to do for our customers, our suppliers, our communities, and each other. To our shareholders, we thank you for the trust you continue to place in us. Thanks again for joining us this morning. We look forward to updating everyone on our progress, and I hope you'll join us at our investor day next week. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.