Welcome to the U.S. Bancorp First Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. Following a review of the results, there will be a formal question-and-answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press one then zero on your phone. If you'd like to withdraw, please press one then zero again. This call will be recorded and available for replay beginning today at approximately 11:00 A.M. Central Time. I will now turn the conference call over to George Andersen, Senior Vice President and Director of Investor Relations for U.S. Bancorp. Thank you, Brad, and good morning, everyone. With me today are Andy Cecere, our Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, and Terry Dolan, our Vice Chair and Chief Financial Officer. During the prepared remarks, Andy and Terry will be referencing a slide presentation. A copy of the presentation, as well as our earnings release and supplemental analyst schedules are available on our website at usbank.com. I would like to remind you that any forward-looking statements made during today's call are subject to risk and uncertainty. Factors that can materially change our current forward-looking assumptions are described on page two of today's presentation in our press release, our Form 10-K, and in subsequent reports on file with the SEC. Following their pre-prepared remarks, Andy and Terry will take any questions that you have. I will now turn the call over to Andy. Thanks, George. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our call. I'll begin on slide three. In the first quarter, we reported earnings per share of $1.04, which includes $0.12 per share of charges related to the MUFG Union Bank acquisition. Excluding those notable items, earnings per share was $1.16. We achieved record net revenue of $7.2 billion for the quarter. Following our successful close of Union Bank acquisition in December of 2022, first quarter results reflected a full year's benefit of the acquired franchise, continued growth in earning assets, net interest margin expansion, and higher non-interest income led by stronger commercial product and mortgage banking fee revenues. Slide four details are reported and adjusted income statement results, as well as the end of period and average balances and other performance metrics. On the right, you'll see the credit quality remains strong but is starting to normalize as expected. Our charge-off ratio of 30 basis points as adjusted is well below pre-COVID levels and reflective of our disciplined risk management culture. The CET1 ratio, our binding regulatory constraint, was 8.5% at the end of the quarter and is consistent with our target capital ratio. We expect to exceed 9.0% later this year as we accrete capital back quickly over the next few quarters and continue to focus on risk-weighted asset optimization initiatives. Slide five provides key performance metrics. Excluding notable items, our return on average asset was 1.15%, and our return on average common equity was 15.7%. Our return on tangible common equity was 24.3% on an adjusted basis. Slide six provides both a high-level timeline and general update on our planned conversion of Union Bank. Integration efforts have been progressing well, and we remain on track for a successful main systems conversion over the upcoming Memorial Day weekend. We anticipate a full transition of all accounts by the second half of the year. Turning to slide seven. The industry disruption early in March has reinforced the importance of maintaining a well-diversified business with an appropriate risk profile. We maintain a resilient and diversified deposit base. Over half of our deposits are insured, and 80% of the uninsured deposits are retail or operational in nature. Our diversified funding sources, ample liquidity levels, and strong credit quality supported by disciplined underwriting standards are all hallmarks of our approach to risk management. I'll now turn the call over to Terry who can provide more detail on the balance sheet strength and the first quarter earnings results. Thanks, Andy. Turning to slide eight. A key strength of the bank is our well-diversified deposit base, which remains a stable source of low-cost funding. As a reminder, following the completion of our acquisition of Union Bank last quarter, our end-of-period deposits totaled $525 billion, including approximately $80 billion of deposits from Union Bank. As we discussed last quarter, $9 billion of Union Bank acquired deposits were transitory in nature, with $4 billion returned to MUFG in the fourth quarter and an additional $4.7 billion that moved back to MUFG in the first quarter of this year. In addition, $1.1 billion of acquired deposits were included in the branch sale or related to PurePoint, a broker deposit gathering mechanism that we discontinued. Importantly, prior to the events of March 8th, we saw expected deposit outflow largely consistent with seasonal patterns reflective of our business mix, including our large trust business. From March 8th through the end of the quarter, deposit balances were relatively stable, down only 0.6% as inflows from new customers were slightly offset by the impact of clients diversifying their deposits and seeking yield in money market funds consistent with broader industry trends. During this period, we saw an increase in money market funds of approximately $10 billion within our wealth management and investment services businesses. We expect the competition for deposits to remain high for the industry in 2023. Our cumulative deposit beta through the first quarter was approximately 34%, and we expect that to increase to about 40% by the end of this rate cycle, generally in line with our previous expectations. Slide nine provides additional detail on the composition of our highly diversified deposit base. As the slide shows, our deposit balances are composed of a broad mix of consumer, corporate, and commercial customers that we support with an expansive broad branch distribution network and mobile capabilities across our national footprint. Our deposit base reflects the wide range of customers and industries that our companies serve. At March 31st, our percent of insured deposits to total deposits was 51%. Approximately 80% of our uninsured deposits are composed of operational wholesale trust and retail deposits that are stickier either because they are contractually bound or tied to treasury management services and trust activities provided to corporate and institutional clients. Combined with our consumer-based deposits, the stability of our funding source is sound. Moving to slide 10, U.S. Bank's total available liquidity as of March 31st was $315 billion, representing 126% of our uninsured deposits. As of December 31st, our liquidity coverage ratio was 122%. As mentioned, our strong debt ratings reflect our diversified business profile, well-collateralized credit exposure, healthy capital and liquidity profiles, and disciplined asset and liability management framework. These attributes work in concert with our strong balance sheet optimization and management practices to ensure strength and stability of our balance sheet. Slide 11 provides details on the composition of our investment securities portfolio. Over the last five quarters, and well ahead of the most recent banking disruption, we reduced the size of our investment securities portfolio from 30%- 25% of total assets while increasing cash levels. In preparation for and as part of the completion of our acquisition of Union Bank, we repositioned our balance sheet by selling fixed-rate loans and investment securities, paid off borrowings, and increased cash balances in response to economic uncertainty, industry dynamics, rising interest rates, and increased market volatility. At March 31st, approximately 90% of the securities in our investment portfolio are backed and/or sponsored by the U.S. federal government, with 55% of securities designated as Held to Maturity and 45% designated as Available for Sale. Available for sale unrealized losses as a percentage of our investment securities portfolio improved in the first quarter, and total AOCI improved by 11% on a linked quarter basis. To slide 12, as a reminder, following the completion of our acquisition of Union Bank, our CET1 capital ratio declined from 9.7% at the end of the third quarter of 2022 to 8.4% as of December 31st, which reflected the impacts of balance sheet optimization and purchase accounting adjustments that will accrete back into capital over the next few years. Strategically, we continue to be encouraged about the financial merits of this deal and the synergistic benefits we expect to realize as a combined institution. As Andy mentioned earlier, our CET1 capital ratio at March 31st was 8.5%. The 10 basis point increase from year-end reflected 20 basis points of capital accretion, offset by the transitional impact of CECL of 10 basis points. As of March 31st, we expect to accrete approximately 20-25 basis points of capital per quarter as we complete the Union Bank integration and realize cost synergies. Importantly, this does not include the impacts of planned RWA optimization initiatives mentioned earlier. Turning to slide 13, total end of period loans were $388 billion, which was flat on a linked-quarter basis and up 21.6% year-over-year. Commercial real estate loans represent approximately 14% of our total loan portfolio, with CRE office exposure representing approximately 2% of total loans and only 1% of total commitments. Leveraged lending balances are not a significant component of the loan portfolio. Slide 14 shows credit quality trends, which continue to be strong, but as expected, are starting to normalize across the portfolio. The ratio of non-performing assets to loans and other real estate was 0.3% at March 31st, compared with 0.26% at December 31st and 0.25% a year ago. Our first quarter net chargeoffs of 0.30%, as adjusted, increased seven basis points versus the fourth quarter level of 0.23%, as adjusted, and was higher when compared to the first quarter of 2022, which was a level of 0.21%. Our allowance for credit losses as of March 31st totaled $7.5 billion or 1.94% of period end loans. As the chart on the upper right side of this slide demonstrates, our credit performance through the cycle serves as a key differentiator for the bank. Slide 15 provides a detailed earnings summary for the quarter. In the first quarter, we earned $1.16 per diluted share, excluding $0.12 of notable items related to the recent acquisition of Union Bank. Slide 16 highlights revenue trends for the quarter. Net revenue totaled $7.2 billion in the first quarter, which included a full quarter of revenue contribution from Union Bank of $832 million, primarily representing net interest income. Net interest income grew 7.9% on a linked-quarter basis and 45.9% year-over-year, driven by earning asset growth and continued net interest margin expansion, which benefited from rising interest rates. Non-interest income as adjusted increased 2.7% compared to the fourth quarter, driven by higher commercial product revenue, mortgage banking revenue, and trust and investment management fees, partially offset by losses of $32 million from security sales. Turning to slide 17, adjusted non-interest expense for the company totaled $4.3 billion in the first quarter, including $546 million from Union Bank. Non-interest expense as adjusted increased 9.1% on a linked-quarter basis, largely driven by the impact of two additional months of Union Bank's operating expenses, core deposit intangible amortization, and higher compensation and other non-interest expenses. I will now provide second quarter and updated full year 2023 forward-looking guidance on slide 18. Starting with the second quarter of 2013 guidance. We expect average earning assets of between $600 billion and $605 billion in the second quarter and a net interest margin of approximately 3%. Total revenue as adjusted is estimated to be in the range of $7.1 billion-$7.3 billion, including approximately $85 million of purchase accounting accretion. Total non-interest expense as adjusted is expected to be in the range of $4.3 billion-$4.4 billion, inclusive of approximately $120 million of core deposit intangible amortization related to Union Bank. Our tax rate is expected to be approximately 23% on a taxable equivalent basis. To date, we have incurred $573 million in merger and integration costs and anticipate charges of between $250 million and $300 million for the second quarter. We continue to estimate total merger and integration costs of approximately $1.4 billion, consistent with earlier guidance. I will now provide updated guidance for the full year. For 2023, average earning assets are now expected to be in the range of $600 billion-$610 billion. We expect the net interest margin to be between 3.0%-3.05% for the full year. Total revenue as adjusted is now expected to be in the range of $28.5 billion-$30.5 billion, inclusive of approximately $350 million of full year purchase accounting accretion. Total non-interest expense as adjusted for the year is expected to be in the range of $17.0 billion-$17.5 billion, inclusive of approximately $500 million of core deposit intangible amortization related to Union Bank. Our estimated full year income tax rate on a taxable equivalent basis is now expected to be approximately 23.0%. We continue to expect to have $900 million-$1 billion of merger and integration charges in 2023. I will now hand it back to Andy for closing remarks. Thanks, Terry. Events of the past few weeks have certainly raised questions about the overall health of the banking industry and the economic outlook. The business of banking involves taking balanced risks, and these risks must be carefully managed, appropriately regulated, and prudently mitigated. At U.S. Bank, we are focused on the strength and stability of our balance sheet. Our investment in risk management practices is guided by our core principle that includes always doing the right thing for the many stakeholders, communities, and constituents we serve. A key strength of our institution is our high quality and diversified business mix and deposit base. The combination of a mix of consumer, corporate, and commercial customers with significant operational deposits, broad geographic reach, and a full breadth and depth of product and service offerings serves as a key differentiator for the bank. Our high debt ratings, resilient liquidity profile, available funding sources, and strong earnings capacity enable us to deliver industry-leading regulatory stress test results and contribute to our resiliency during times of uncertainty. As we continue to work to ensure a successful conversion of Union Bank next month, we are already seeing the benefits of increased scale and market share as we bring our enhanced digital capabilities and broad and diverse product set to the Union Bank customer base. Our reputation as a prudent risk manager has been earned through our performance over many cycles, and we have never been more focused on the strength and stability of our balance sheet. Let me close by thanking our employees for all that they do on a daily basis for our customers, communities, and shareholders. We have shown incredible strength and stability during these challenging times, and I am more confident than ever in our ability to continue to deliver exceptional client service, superior product offerings in a rapidly changing environment. We'll now open the call for Q&A. Thank you. We'll now begin the question and answer session. If you have a question, please press one then zero on your phone. If you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press one zero again. Once again, if you have a question, please press one then zero on your phone. One moment here. We'll go to Scott Siefers, Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Morning, everybody. Hey. lots of noise in the deposit flows in the first quarter. I guess, moving forward, what would your expectations be for total deposit flows or balances and then the mix of non-interest bearing to total, as we sort of get through this cycle? Yeah. You know, our expectation, you know, is that if you end up just looking at the industry, there's gonna be pressure on deposits and high competition. You know, we think we'll fare quite well with respect to that. You know, to the extent that we see changes in deposits, it'll be kind of based upon that competition. I would say relatively stable. Coming to your second question, you know, the mix of NIBs as an example in roughly fourth quarter was about 25%, 26% in that ballpark. It's 25%, and we think it's kinda hitting that kind of stable level, keeping in mind that, you know, we have a lot of operational deposits tied to both our corporate and our corporate trust businesses, and that kinda helps to sustain it. It's a combination of things, Scott. Okay. Perfect. Thank you. Was hoping we could talk for a second about just the categorization and when you guys would expect to be a Category II bank. I think there's a lot of chatter going around, especially in light of that report from a couple days ago. Maybe just in sort of clear terms, when would you expect to be a Category II bank? Will that be due to your asset size or thanks to the Fed's flexibility to designate you as one? How would you guys get there by that time? You know, our trajectory with respect to Category II is no earlier than the end of 2024. You know, that will be I think that'll be more driven by whether the Fed makes that decision or not, rather than asset size. You know, again, as we kind of manage the company, you know, we're gonna be continued to be very focused on profitable loan growth and things like that. We get there when we get there, but that our, you know, our expectation right now is no sooner than the end of 2024. Okay. Perfect. You, you guys feel like you're prepared to get there by that time, basically? Yeah. It'll be a combination of a couple of things we talked about, you know, just the capital generation from earnings, and of course, that is helped by the Union Bank transaction. Then, you know, we're very focused on capital management. We have to be, you know, just, because of the Category II and, you know, we'll be very focused on risk-weighted asset optimization and making sure that we're focused on profitable growth. Perfect. Okay. Thank you very much. Next, we'll go to Erika Najarian with UBS. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Morning, Erika. I guess the question for USB is, I don't think your investors doubt the through the cycle credit outperformance or even the PPNR strength. It's well noted that, you know, the adjustment to your revenue outlook was very minimal relative to peers. You know, I think the big question that investors have is, you know, you're starting from 8.5% CET1. You note, you know, earnings power and organic capital generation of 20- 25 basis points. As we anticipate Cat. II, and you're telling us that the Fed could decide and not your asset size necessarily could decide when that line is, what is the new endpoint of a CET1 in your view? As we think about going into that new category, I don't think investors think that 8.5%-9% is the right bogey. The sort of the sub question to that, Andy, is your priority getting to a higher capital level faster? If so, how are you thinking about dividend growth this year? Erika, good question. I'm just gonna go from the beginning. I think that would be helpful. As you know, we were well above 9% and came down to 8.4% as a result of the Union Bank transaction. The Union Bank transaction is a terrific transaction. We're exceeding our revenue expectations. We are coming under on our expense expectations. The accretion is greater than we expected. The value of the franchise is positive for sure. As we think about the Category II, I have, you know, three or four factors I think about. Number one is the earnings accretion that we talked about, which is strong and growing and will become even more accretive as we get through the cost takeout component of the Union Bank integration. Number two is we have a number of initiatives across the board for risk-weighted asset optimization. Those are things like credit transfers, risk transfers, a number of things to optimize the balance sheet that I think we ought to be focused on and are very focused on to your question. That I think with those two things, as I mentioned, we expect to exceed 9% by the end of this year. That coupled with our AOC burn down and additional accretion as we go into 2024, makes me comfortable that we are prepared with whatever event occurs as it relates to Category II in the timing, as Terry mentioned, no earlier than the end of 2024. Yeah. A couple of things that I would maybe add, 'cause that's right on. Coming back to AOCI, you know, that burn will be kind of a function of a lot of different things. you know, we have been very proactive in terms of repositioning the AFS portfolio, looking at assets, sales and securitization or asset sales, security sales, et cetera. To kind of give you some sense, you know, the duration of that investment portfolio, of the AFS portfolio has gone from a little over 4.5% in the fourth quarter to about 3.8% at the end of the first quarter. We're going to continue to shorten the duration, you know, and that's going to help us with respect to managing AOCI. In addition to that, you know, we have been essentially reducing the volatility of AOCI to up interest rate environments through hedging activities. It's a, it's a combination of a variety of things that we're gonna go through. Is 9.5%-10% an appropriate new bogey as we think about the shift change for next year on Cat. II? Erika, as you know, the regulators are going through an analysis and a process right now to think about how capital levels ought to be in the industry across the board with Basel IV Endgame and whatever changes to categorization that occur. We are waiting for that as you are to understand what the new environment will look like. The plan that we have in place is assuming what Terry just discussed. Just if I could sneak one last one in. You know, one of your peers closest to you in size said that TLAC was pretty much done and dusted. You know, I noticed that you mentioned your, you know, superior debt rating several times. You know, clearly the debt markets are still a little bit dislocated. How should we think about, you know, the wholesale funding stack from here? I noticed on a period end basis, short-term borrowings went up by $25 billion. You know, Terry, as you potentially anticipate, you know, a TLAC, you know, how should we think about your senior debt issuance, plans or really sort of hold that level of borrowings until there is a little bit more, less dislocation in the senior debt market? Yeah. Again, TLAC is one of those things that we're going to learn more as we kind of go over the course of the next 12 months. You know, I think the real question is not whether or not TLAC will exist because I do believe and we're expecting that it will be something that gets put into place. How does that get calibrated for, you know, the regional banks, reflecting the risk profile that we have relative to the G-SIBs? You know, there's a wide range of estimates that are out there. You know, when we end up looking at that, maybe one reasonable estimate would be based upon the foreign bank operators and kind of what levels of TLAC. You know, if that is the case for us, I think it would be very manageable. It would be within a range that we would be able to manage to. That just gives us flexibility with respect to how we utilize that within the bank. Thank you. Thanks, Erika. Next we can go to Mike Mayo with Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead. Morning, Mike. Hi. Mike. Well, your PE, if you believe consensus, is close to seven, and the market's around 20. Your, your relative PE is one of the lowest in history. I would posit that the market's concerned about something other than earnings. I guess the simple question for you, Andy, is will U.S. Bancorp need to issue capital, and how confident are you about that? On the other side, are buybacks potentially an option once you get to 9% CET1? The reason I bring that up is you've seen the front page articles and papers. If you're forced to recognize the unrealized securities losses, and you do a burn down, and then people come up with all sorts of numbers, you know, would you be forced to realize that? You heard Congress talk about these issues. Could you be forced to incorporate that as part of the current stress test? Could the Fed force your hand sooner? You know, any color you can give, what's your confidence that you might need to issue capital, over the next, you know, year or so? Thanks, Mike. As I said, I'm that is not part of our thinking as we sit today. I'm confident that our earnings accretion, our RWA optimization, our AOC burn down will all get us to a point that we will be at the appropriate capital levels. I can assure you that it's a high focus area for myself and the entire management team, including Terry. That is something we're very focused on. Now, as it relates to buybacks, I will tell you, as we all know, there's a lot of capital changes that are likely to occur from a regulatory standpoint. We're not going to do anything until we have more clarity around that, which we hope to have in the second half of the year. The focus on getting to the appropriate capital levels as quickly as possible, accreting capital and building that capital base is priority one. Yeah. Mike, the thing that I would add to that, you know, we're going to learn with respect to exactly how moving to Category II and, you know, the inclusion in unrealized losses gets incorporated into the CCAR process. You know, just as a reminder, we have a pretty significant amount of buffer that already exists just based upon our credit performance and our PPNR performance because of the earnings capacity. You know, we continue to reduce the volatility of AOCI to rising interest rates. We're doing that through, you know, pay fixed hedges and, you know, just shortening the duration and things that I talked about earlier. I think there's very likely that they will incorporate, you know, a higher rate environment into the CCAR process. I will tell you that we've done lots of scenarios that look at a stagflation sort of environment. You know, we actually perform better in that environment because the revenue streams tend to hold up, given our mix of business, et cetera. You know, we're taking a lot of that into consideration. Like Andy said, we feel pretty confident that we don't have to go through a capital raise. The as part of this year's stress test, would they include the unrealized securities losses since that would incorporate the nine-quarter time horizon or no? No, that is not required in this CCAR analysis as a condition of the way the deal was structured. Then last short one. Your non-interest-bearing deposits, I know you brought that up before. It certainly went down more than average this quarter. You're not guiding your margin down too much. You said 3%- 3.05% versus, I guess, 3.1% this quarter. Why wouldn't you be guiding that down even further given the decline in non-interest-bearing deposits quarter-over-quarter? Yeah, it's a couple of different things. One is, again, if you end up just looking at the mix of total deposits, we again think that total deposits will be relatively stable and that the mix of NIB will be relatively stable around that 25%, you know, up or down. Part of the decline this particular quarter ties back to some of the seasonal flows which, you know, are part of our trust business, but also the deposits that we knew were gonna go out the door to MUFG because of closing down the PurePoint, et cetera. You know, all of those things kind of tie into the reason why we saw the decline this quarter. All right. Thank you. Mm-hmm. Next we can go to John McDonald with Autonomous Research. Please go ahead. Hey, John. Morning, guys. Wanted to ask on the idea of getting above nine by the end of the year on CET1. Does that rely on the RWA mitigation opportunities, or is that just kind of the 20-25 basis points that Terry mentioned before the RWA benefit? Is that something that will help you next year? Can you talk a little bit about that? We think that the capital generation, the accretion that we'll see of the 2025 is core earnings capability. It does not rely on those RWAs. The RWA optimization that we will go through will be above and beyond that. It's a part of that overall capital strategy that Andy talked about earlier. The benefits of that should happen and help you towards the end of this year, maybe into next year as you work towards the end of 2024 capital target? Yeah. It'll help us both this year as well as into next year. Absolutely. Okay. As you know, John, we've been kind of preparing for Cat. II for, you know, well over one year. We put a lot of things in place in the third and fourth quarter. We took some actions in the fourth quarter, and we'll utilize a lot of those tools, if you will, as part of the RWA optimization process that we're gonna go through. Yes. Just to clarify, Terry, this hasn't happened prior to the end of 2024, even with the Fed, right? The Fed would tell you on January 2024 that it would take effect by the end of 2024, right? It's not like they're gonna tell you any earlier, is that correct? That is, that is correct. Okay. Any idea of the pace of AOCI burn down? Obviously, the AOCI came down 11% this quarter with the help of rates. In a world where rates aren't coming down, what's the natural kind of burn off pace that you might expect for that over a year or two? Any help on that and just kind of reminding us of the duration again. Yeah. Well, again, the duration of the AFS portfolio right now is about 3.8 years. You know, just, if you kind of take that into consideration, you know, the burn down will still be fairly reasonable, you know, even without interest rates. We've put some hedges into place in order to dampen the effect of rising interest rates with respect to AOCI. Okay, thanks. Thanks, John. Next we go to John Pancari with Evercore. Please go ahead. Morning. Hi, John. Hey, John. On the back to the RWA optimization, can you maybe give us a little more color on what you're looking at there? I know you mentioned credit transfers and risk transfers, but maybe if you can kind of flesh that out a little bit and maybe just an idea of the magnitude of the benefit that you see potentially materializing as a result of the RWA actions. Then lastly, is other business or portfolio sales or divestitures considered within that? Thanks. The second part of the question was? Are other business sales considered? Oh, business sales. Yeah. At least at this particular point in time, obviously we'll look at, we'll look at a lot of different things in terms of businesses that we, you know, may look at to sell. I mean, that portfolio optimization is something we're always doing, and we've done that a number of different times over the last several years. You know, that obviously will be something we'll look at. You know, we have a sizable mortgage servicing rights portfolio. We'll take a look at, you know, selling portions of that where that makes sense. We'll look at asset securitization like we did in the fourth quarter. You know, there are a whole variety of risk transfer sort of structures that, both we have put into place when we have on the shelf and we're ready to kind of start moving forward on, you know, when we can. I think it's a whole variety of different things that we will take a look at, as well as, you know, balancing the mix toward, growth in, what I would say less capital-intensive businesses as opposed to capital-intensive businesses. It'll be a whole combination of things, as we move forward, John. Do you have a way to help us estimate the magnitude in terms of how you're thinking about that targeted contribution from the RWA optimization strategies? The, you know, the strategies that we have in place are reflected in the guidance that we provided. That, that would not change that, and we'll continue to update that guidance given the economic conditions and, rates and the scenarios that we see. As Terry mentioned, this is a priority for us and, we have a number of initiatives underway, which is the appropriate thing to do, because I think capital for all banks is gonna be more precious, as we think about the forward regulatory environment. Got it. Just one more for me, I know you mentioned in terms of other regulatory changes potentially coming down the pike. You're already in the advanced phase of proposed rulemaking on the TLAC. Can you just talk about the other potential regulatory changes you see coming down the pike? I know you had mentioned the AOCI efforts, but can you talk about potentially around FDIC or stress capital buffer, liquidity rules, anything on that front worth commenting on? Yeah. I mean, it could be a number of different things. I mean, we talked about TLAC, I mean, just levels of capital. You know, you hear them talking about domestically systemically important banks. You know, so increasing the level of the stress capital buffer is another piece of it. I think another one will be around LCR. Then in the CCAR process, I think that they'll incorporate, you know, I would say multiple. They'll kind of go back to what they used to do. They'll have kind of multiple scenarios, but one will be kind of what I would say a traditional sort of stress test where, you know, unemployment goes up and rates come down. Another one will be more, I think, some form of a stagflation where rates stay relatively high, and, you know, you experience the credit loss stress. Again, we've run a variety of different scenarios, and I think we feel like we would be able to withstand either one of those just based upon our risk profile. Got it. Okay, thanks, Terry. Next, we can go to Gerard Cassidy with RBC. Please go ahead. Hey, Gerard. Good morning. Good morning, Gerard. Good morning, Terry. Good morning, Andy. I have a narrower question. I think it was on slide eight, you guys talked about the impacts of deposits following March 8th. The inflows that you referenced, did that come primarily in the Union Bank franchise? Because obviously it was physically located in California, and I know you guys have been in California as well. Then second, was it more commercial versus consumer or more interest-bearing versus non-interest-bearing? Yeah. Maybe in terms of the mix. You know, right after March 8th, we actually saw a lot of account customer opening, more so on the commercial corporate side. I would say probably 70% on that side as opposed to on the consumer side of the equation we saw inflows. Again, that ended up getting offset by kind of seasonal flows within corporate trust as the rest of the month kind of progressed. You know, the other thing that I would say is that, you know, when I look at deposit net new customer accounts in specifically in California on the consumer side, we actually saw, you know, a nice increase or pop in March relative to previous months. I think that we're actually probably seeing some benefits associated with that. Yeah, and I think that addresses the questions that you had. Thank you. Then, over the years, you guys have always done quite well in, you know, underwriting your loan portfolio. You show up well in the CCAR tests over the years on credit. So you don't have a very big exposure to commercial real estate. I always find it interesting to talk to banks that don't have big exposures to a potential credit area that could be a problem. What are you guys seeing in that commercial real estate area, particularly in the office portfolio? Any color would be helpful. Sure, Gerard. First of all, the rest of the portfolio is very stable. If you look at our charge-off rates on non-accruals, and so forth, and the numbers around credit metrics, the rest of the portfolio is stable and starting to normalize, but normalizing as we expected. I do think the area of focus for all of us is office within real estate. I do think there's some activity occurring there with tenants, behavior changes, sponsor behavior changes. That is gonna cause some pressure in the industry, because of maybe an acceleration of what we thought was gonna be a little longer process occurring more rapidly. You can imagine that we're very focused on it as well. We have not put on a lot of CRE office over the last many years. We've been very, very conservative around that. As you say, we don't have a large exposure, but I do think it's an area of a lot of emphasis and focus because I do think there are gonna be pressures occurring. Thank you. Next, we can go to Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Good morning, Ebrahim. Good morning. Good morning. I had a follow-up question. I think you briefly mentioned about AOCI hedges against if rates spike. I was wondering, Terry, if you can elaborate on that. We've seen the five-year come back again in the last few weeks. Just what's the downside risk to capital or just an increase in AOCI if rates spiked another 50 basis points? Just talk to us in terms of the extent to which you expect to hedge against that. Again, we've been taking a number of different actions in order to kind of dampen the effect. As I said, selling securities where appropriate, shortening the duration, which, you know, we did very nicely, I guess, in the first quarter. Putting in place, you know, pay fixed swaps against the long end of the curve. Dampening the effect of, you know, a move, I meant up, of rates in both of, you know, for example, in the five and 10-year sort of space. You know, we, if rates moved up 50 basis points, obviously AOCI would be impacted to some extent, but we've dampened that quite a bit over the course of the last couple of quarters. Understood. Just going back, to, deposit betas, I think, you talked about 40%, relative to 34 this quarter. I mean, I'm sure you all do a ton of analysis on where terminal betas might end up. What's the downside risk? I mean, we've obviously had a shock to the system, Fed funds being 5%+. What's the risk? How do you handicap the risk of that 40% beta actually turning out to be something much higher, maybe closer to 50%? Yeah. You know, we've done a lot of different analysis and, you know, I mean, you are right. You know, the competition for deposits is getting stronger. We've kind of taken that into consideration. You know, we're seeing over 5% in some markets. Generally, it is smaller banks where that is occurring, community markets, those sorts of things. That's because for those entities, that's their primary source of funding. You know, that's going to occur. You know, all of that has been kinda taken into consideration in terms of looking at that 40% deposit beta. You know, if you end up looking at our business, again, in terms of who we end up competing against, et cetera. You know, what we end up looking at and tracking is, especially on the institutional corporate side of the equation, is money market, rates and those sorts of things. You know, right now that's kind of in the high fours. Our, deposit pricing, is very competitive with that, which is why it gives us confidence with respect to both flows and the deposit betas that we've articulated. Got it. You don't see a major shift in consumer and retail deposit pricing today versus maybe at the start of the year? Yeah, it's gonna depend. I mean, obviously it depends upon the rate environment. I mean, if the Fed, for example, goes up another 50 or 100 basis points from here, you know, that would put more pressure on deposit betas. You know, if you end up looking at the market implied or even, you know, up a bit, you know, I still feel pretty comfortable with where we're at. Got it. Thank you. Mm-hmm. Next we go to Matt O'Connor with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Good morning, Matt. Good morning. It's Deutsche Bank. You got very strong reserves to loans on a stated basis. I guess first, can you remind us what the impact is if you adjusted for the Union Bank loans that were marked at fair value when you took them on? If you have that handy. Yeah. I missed the first part of the question. Andy, do you? I think, or Matt, you're trying to understand the, if Union Bank has an impact on our reserve to loans ratio and what it is. I don't think it has a major impact. Not a significant one. Okay. Then just broadly speaking, like, as you think about, the rest of the year, I mean, you're obviously taking your best guess on reserves at, the current period. Hey, Matt. What are your thoughts on... Sorry. Yeah. Sorry, it's hard to hear you. Sorry, can you hear me better now? That's better. Yes. Thank you, Matt. Okay. Sorry about that. I was just asking about the outlook for the loan loss reserves, from here, in your base case. Yeah. You know, our expectation is that, you know, again, Andy's talked about the fact that, you know, we're preparing for any economic sort of outcome that might exist. I think if you end up looking at the consensus in the marketplace, you know, some form of recession, probably a softer or moderate sort of recession late this year or early next year. If you look at the market implieds, that would kind of, you know, tie into that. When we go through our reserving process, you know, we look at multiple scenarios. You know, we weight, to the conservative side, you know. We look at five different scenarios. We make, assumptions with respect to that. You know, only 35% of it's, weighted toward what I would call the base case. The rest of it is downside. You know, we feel pretty good about where reserve levels are. You know, obviously, if we saw a economic shock, above and beyond kind of what is being expected, that might be a little bit different. We feel pretty good about, you know, how we're thinking about it. Okay, great. Then maybe, if I could just squeeze in on spending trends throughout 1Q. You guys, through your payments business, obviously see a lot. Just any observations on kind of trends throughout the quarter and maybe any comments so far, in April? Thank you. Yeah. In our payments business, you know, we continue to see pretty strong sales. 10%+, for example, in our payments merchant processing business. A very strong mid to high single digits with respect to our corporate payments business. If you end up comparing any of these things to pre-pandemic is, you know, through the roof. We continue to see a good spend in the business. I would say that after the market disruption, there was a bit more softness in retail sales, which we're gonna continue to watch. It's really too early to tell whether or not that's a trend or whether that was really, some of the concerns around the market disruption, but we'll continue to watch that. Andy, what would you add? Yeah. That, you know, is still growing, Matt, but it's just growing at a lower rate, particularly in retail. Airline spend continues to be very, very high, which is a little bit of the reason that we have a differential between sales growth and revenue growth because the airline spread is a little thinner. Travel continues to be strong. Retail came down a bit, but still growing. Great. Thank you. Sure. Next we can go to Chris Kotowski with Oppenheimer & Co. Please go ahead. Good morning, thanks. Good morning, Chris. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. You've given us a lot of good detail on the AFS side. I just wonder if you could discuss a little bit, you know, how you anticipate managing the held to maturity portfolio. Do you also plan to let that kind of burn down and shorten? I'm curious, just given that it's a lot of mortgage backs and that there are, you know, principal payments each month, how quickly does that portfolio burn down? Do you see the need to maintain a lot of duration there, just in case we get another decline in rates? Yeah. I mean, obviously we look at both sides of the equation. The burn down on the HTM side is simply because of the nature of it is really more tied to, you know, how quickly you see payoffs and what the duration of that ends up looking at. You know, I think as we look at the size of the investment portfolio, et cetera, we'll, you know, take into consideration what level of duration we want to have in that in the HTM portfolio. That's gonna be more a function of just pay downs and payoffs over time. Yeah, I mean, just I guess question directionally, the next couple of quarters there's? You'd probably let the duration shorten and the size of the portfolio burn down left to your. Yep. Own devices? Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Yep. Okay. All righty, that's it for me. Thank you. Thanks, Chris. Next, we have Ken Usdin with Jefferies. Please go ahead. Hey, guys, good morning. First question I just want to ask you on credit. On an adjusted basis, your charge offs were 30 basis points this quarter. Per the comments you made earlier about CRE and some of the data we see in the release about delinquencies and NPAs increasing, what's your outlook for charge offs as we go forward versus the 30 basis points that we saw in the first? Yeah, I mean, our expectation is that that 30 basis will continue to normalize throughout the year and into 2024, probably on a similar sort of pace. You know, I think it's 23 basis points in the fourth quarter. You know, I think that that will continue to kind of move up as the year progresses. Just part of normalization. Yep, understood on that. Okay. Just coming back to the full year guide, obviously you made a modest adjustment, which is well expected given the change in the rate outlook. We, we can back into that, I think it's mostly on the NII side, just given that that's where seemingly some of the changes were versus the prior outlook. Can you just kind of refresh us and just give us kind of just some underlying thoughts of NII growth versus fee growth and any changes you had on, if any, on the fee side versus your prior outlook? Thank you. To your point, most of the changes were in NII. It's a function of the rate curve, the rate environment, the expectation about rate increases, as well as the deposit pricing that Terry made reference to in the beta of approaching 40%. Most of the change was in NII. Okay. Just last follow-up. Embedded in your fee outlook for the year is pretty decent growth, it would seem then? Are you expecting that to still be mostly driven by the payments business, or are there other areas that you're expecting to see some good growth in? You know, we have a great diversity of revenue sources, and they're all doing well. Payments is up double, you know, approaching double digits, 9% on a year-over-year basis, as Terry talked about. Spend levels are good. We've had a bang of a quarter in our commercial products group across the categories, and that is doing just terrifically in this environment and just driving revenue growth as well. Trust is doing well, so is and mortgage. We, you know, that's the value of a diverse revenue stream. There are many different sources of revenue and fee income. Got it. Understood. Thanks, guys. Thank you. Next we go to Vivek Juneja with J.P. Morgan. Hi, Vivek. Hi, Andy. Hi, Terry. A couple of just clarifications. I think you all mentioned that accretion from the deal, Andy, is going better than you'd expected any, you know, I know you've talked a lot, just trying to pull this all together. Where are you seeing it better thus far? Yeah. We talked about this, Vivek, in the fourth quarter that, you know, the expectation of that 8% going through 11%, and the return's actually better. You know, if I look at it in the big picture, when we initially thought about the deal, Union Bank had a $2.9 billion or so revenue base and a $2.3 billion dollar expense base, so $600 PPNR. You look at the first quarter, it's double that. The revenues are stronger, principally because of the value deposits in this rate environment. The expenses are a little less, and our expectations on our efficiencies are continuing to be on plan. All that adds up to a higher accretion. That higher accretion is the net purchase accounting is actually negative given the. Right. Core deposit intangible. It's very strong. Right. That's before you even finish the integration that you. I mean, that's not till second quarter anyway. Yeah. That's right. That's correct. All right. Thank you. Mm-hmm. We can go to Erika Najarian with UBS. Yes, sorry to prolong the call. Just had one follow-up question. Andy, I asked the question in a compound way, so I apologize. You know, if you think about accreting to over 9% CET1 at by year end How would you stack rank dividend growth as a priority? Dividend growth continues to be a priority, Erika. Our expectation is we would have continued growth in the dividend. The dividend growth number is not hugely material to the capital accretion math. You know, if you, if you go through the numbers on that is a relatively small component of a negative downturn in capital. That expectation that I talked about includes the expectation of a strong dividend. Thank you. Sure. Next we'll go to Mike Mayo with Wells Fargo Securities. Hey, Mike. Hi. Hey, last quarter, you mentioned your reserves were for an environment with 6% unemployment. I was wondering if you had an update for that? Given CECL accounting, does that mean your reserving is done before the recession has even started? How do you think about that, and what about the release of reserves to the extent you stay down this, you know, low charge-off range, even with some of the normalization? Yeah. Well, I think, we'll wait and see what ends up happening given the uncertainty that's in the economy regarding the last bit of it. Yeah, no, we had said that it was the weighted average at the peak was, you know, peak quarter was about a little over 6%. It's about 5.9% today is kind of what our weighted average case kind of comes up to. Very similar to what we had before. Okay. Your outlook for the economy, soft recession, hard landing, kind of what you're thinking? Mike, we expect a soft recession, a moderate recession later half of this year. As Terry mentioned, our CECL accounting is assuming a sort of a two-thirds downturn, one-third base case. We are reserved to a little bit more downward scenario. Okay, thank you. You bet. We have no further questions at this time. I will now turn it back to George Andersen. Please continue. Thank you for listening to our call. Please contact the investor relations department if you have any follow-up questions. This concludes today's conference. Thanks for participating. You may now disconnect.