Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Univest Financial Corporation Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. I would now like to turn the call over to Jeff Schweitzer, President and CEO of Univest Financial Corporation. Please go ahead. Thank you, Mandeep. Good morning, and thank you to all of our listeners for joining us. Joining me on the call this morning is Mike Keim, our Chief Operating Officer and President of Univest Bank and Trust, and Brian Richardson, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone of the forward-looking statements disclaimer. Please be advised that during the course of this conference call, management may make forward-looking statements that express management's intentions, beliefs, or expectations within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Univest's actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. I will refer you to the forward-looking cautionary statements in our earnings release and in our SEC filings. Hopefully, everyone had a chance to review our earnings release from yesterday. If not, it could be found on our website at univest.net under the Investor Relations tab. We reported net income of $16.8 million during the second quarter, or $0.57 per share. This was a 26.7% increase in earnings per share over the second quarter of 2022. Our results during the quarter included a $1.1 million after-tax restructuring charge related to the reduction of three financial centers, along with reduced headcount, primarily focused on our commercial real estate and residential mortgage lending teams. These cost reduction initiatives were in response to the macroeconomic headwinds we are observing relating to rising funding costs. We anticipate these expense reduction initiatives will result in $5.4 million of annualized savings. Like most in our industry, we continue to be impacted by the rising cost of funding, which negatively impacted our net interest margin, which contracted by 44 basis points during the quarter. Given the rising costs of funding, we continue to increase loan pricing and focus our lending on full relationship customers. While loan production was still strong during the second quarter, this is due to commitments we had already made to customers. We anticipate lending to slow in the second half of the year and full-year loan growth to approximate 9%. Before I pass it over to Brian, I would like to thank the entire Univest family for the great work they do every day. Our team continues to focus on making a positive impact on our communities by serving our customers, communities, and each other. I will now turn it over to Brian for further discussion on our results. Thank you, Jeff. I would also like to thank everyone for joining us today. I would like to start by touching on five items from the earnings release. First, as Jeff mentioned, we experienced continued pressure on funding costs during the quarter due to a mix shift of deposits as well as increased deposit betas and borrowing costs. Reported margin of 3.14% decreased 44 basis points compared to last quarter. Our NIM contraction did slow during the quarter. NIM for the month of March was 3.41%. This decreased by 14 and 19 basis points during April and May, respectively. NIM contraction for the month of June was only 1 basis point, resulting in a monthly NIM of 3.07%. Our cycle-to-date interest-bearing deposit beta was 46.6% for the quarter and 33.7% when including total deposits. Our cost of funds was 2.19%, up from 1.53% last quarter. Second, I would like to provide an update on our liquidity and funding position. During the quarter, deposits increased by $152.7 million. We experienced decreases of $46 million in personal accounts, $27.8 million in public funds, and $77.9 million in business accounts, which includes outflows for two customers, which totaled $157 million. Offsetting these decreases was a $304.4 million increase in broker deposits, which ended the quarter at $431.4 million, or 5.7% of total assets. Non-interest-bearing deposits decreased by $216 million during the quarter, of which $151.6 million occurred in April and $25.5 million occurred in June. As of June 30th, non-interest-bearing deposits represented 26.4% of total deposits, compared to 30.8% at March 31st. At June 30th, unprotected deposits, which excludes insured, internal, and collateralized, and trust, and public fund deposit accounts, totaled $1.4 billion and represented 23.3% of total deposits. The corporation and its subsidiaries had committed borrowing capacity of $3.2 billion at June 30th, of which $2 billion was available. We also maintained uncommitted funding sources from correspondent banks of $410 million at June 30th, of which $285 million was unused. Third, during the quarter, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $3.4 million. Our coverage ratio of 1.28% at June 30th was consistent with March 31st. Net charge-offs for the quarter totaled $512,000, or 3 basis points annualized. During the quarter, we saw continued stability in non-performing assets and a reduction in criticized and classified loans for the second consecutive quarter. Fourth, non-interest income increased $835,000, or 4.4% compared to the second quarter of 2022. The value of our diversified business model continues to serve us well during the current interest rate cycle and the resulting pressure on our spread business. Fifth, non-interest expense increased $2.4 million, or 5.1% compared to the second quarter of 2022. E xcluding the $1.3 million of restructuring charges incurred during the quarter, expenses increased $1.1 million or 2.3%. I believe the remainder of the earnings release was straightforward. I would now like to provide an update to our 2023 guidance. First, on last quarter's call, I had guided to loan growth of 5%-8% for 2023. As Jeff mentioned earlier, we anticipate lending to slow in the second half of the year, and while our year-to-date loan growth was $339 million or 11% annualized, we expect full year loan growth of approximately 9%. We expect net interest income to be flat to up 2% for the year based on current information. This reflects yesterday's 25 basis point rate increase and a cycle to date all-in deposit beta of approximately 40% by the end of the year. Deposit betas continue to be volatile in the current environment and could have a material impact on our actual net interest income. Second, our provision for credit loss guidance remains unchanged at $12 million-$16 million. However, the provision will continue to be event-driven, including loan growth, changes in economic-related assumptions, and the credit performance of the portfolio, including specific credits. Third, our non-interest income growth guidance for the year is being reduced from 4%-6% to 2%-4%. As a reminder, the 2%-4% is off the 2022 base of $76.9 million, which excludes $977,000 of BOLI death benefits. Fourth, our non-interest expense growth guidance is being reduced from 7%-9% to 6%-8%. This reflects the previously discussed cost saving initiatives as well as the one-time restructuring charges incurred during the quarter. Lastly, as it relates to income taxes, we expect our effective tax rate to be approximately 20% based on current statutory rates. That concludes my prepared remarks. We'll be happy to answer any questions. Mandeep, would you please begin the question-and-answer session? The floor is now open for your questions. To ask a questions this time, please press star one on your telephone keypad. At any point you'd like to withdraw from the queue, please press star one again. We'll now take a moment to compile our roster. Our first question comes from the line of Frank Schiraldi from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Good morning. Good morning, Frank. Morning, Frank. It sounds like, based on the guide or the outlook, that you got a little bit more to go on the deposit betas. You also talked about, kind of it sounds like seeing some NIM stabilization here, in the month of June. You know, just wondering if you talk about where new business is going on here, and if you do think that the NIM has stabilized at this point, at that, you know, sort of June level? It's the June level, Frank, this is Brian. Overall, I think there still will be a little bit of downward pressure on NIM, although it has slowed. One data point in the month of June is a little bit tough to reach a conclusion based on, we are seeing on the asset side, loans continue to kind of ratchet up, now coming on in, in the mid- 7% range. The wild card continues to be really on the deposit side and what occurs there. Of course, with the Fed pausing in the back half of the quarter helped, with yesterday's action, that will bring a little bit of an element of uncertainty here as we progress forward. Again, the one basis point of NIM contraction in the month of June was certainly a welcome data point. Okay. I guess same question on the just loan balance side. In terms of the growth, have you seen some stabilization and balances later in the quarter? Just given your commentary about. It sounded like this was stuff that was already sort of in the pipeline that led to the growth this quarter. You know, just follow up on that, when we think about this new update, the 9% expected growth, is the bias that, you know, given the expansion markets and such, that, you know, the bias is still to the upside there, or, or how should we think about that? Frank, it's Mike Keim. You know, loan growth was solid throughout the quarter. You know, as we look through and, and project through the rest of the year, we are very focused on bringing in that 9% level. We think that that's consistent with regard to where our deposit levels continue to grow to, and also to maintain, you know, the current capital ratios that we have in place. When you balance that out, plus what Brian indicated in terms of where we're pricing our loans at, all those give us an indication that we, you know, will be able to hit that 9%. We're not trying to go above that 9% at this point in time. I will tell you, demand would be there for us. We could do more than that. We just think it's a prudent target to hit at that point in time. The other thing that combines into this is that our mortgage production is starting to be swing towards much more oriented toward the agency side of the business. We expect less residential mortgage to go onto our balance sheet and stay on our balance sheet throughout the rest of the year. Okay, great. Thank you, guys. Thank you, Frank. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Perito from KBW. Please go ahead. Hi, everyone. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Morning, Michael. Morning. I wanted to maybe follow up on a couple of Frank's questions around growth and NIM. I mean, it's just as we think about, like, some of the ' expansion markets', that you guys are in, like Lancaster, maybe even the Jersey Shore, kind of outside your core market. I mean, can you give us a reminder or an update of, you know, how kind of self-funded those markets are? And when you think about loan growth and putting stuff on, I mean, is there a kind of a change in approach or kind of, do you have to sit down with the teams there and maybe, like, rejigger around, like, focuses in terms of making sure that there's as much focus on bringing in loans as deposits as, you know, maybe a year and a half ago, when there was just more funding available kind of across your franchise to you? Yeah. Mike, it's Mike Keim. I'll answer the last part of that question first. Yeah, when we were sitting on excess liquidity of $0.5 billion - $0.75 billion, obviously, we were more focused on the loan side of the equation, and using up that excess liquidity position. Given the current situation, we've actually further emphasized deposits as an equal weight relative to loans with our RM teams, and we're also looking at SBA volume, where we can do some things with regard to the gain on sale line items there. We have refocused the teams, but we're still gonna take good care of our customers. 9% loan growth is still very healthy. We do have an emphasis for our RM teams across our footprint, to continue to raise and increase the level of deposits that we hold. From the new markets perspective, the way to just look at this is we would have ramped up hiring faster if, you know, what happened in early March, did not happen. We're taking a more disciplined approach and a more patient approach with regard to the new markets. We're glad that we are in them. It gives us geographic distribution with regard to our loan portfolios, and we see that as a bright part of our future. Those teams are also focused on deposits just as much as they are on loans. You know, and like I said, we just have to be a little bit more patient in terms of the ramp-up period there. We understand that, we acknowledge that, and we think that's appropriate. Thanks, Mike. That's helpful color. Maybe a question for Brian, just, you know, the 100 basis points reduction in the range on the OpEx for this year. You know, just as we think to next year, I mean, is it fair, I understand you'll probably stop shy of giving us a number, but is it fair to think of that growth rate taking another step down next year, just with the full benefit of some of these cost actions coming in and just kind of the, the more controlled posture you guys are having on the OpEx line as we think about 2024? Clearly not going to be giving full year guidance for 2024, I think, the way you're thinking about it would be correct, where there continue to be controls on the expense side of the house. Got it. Thank you. Then just one last one for me, for Jeff. I'm trying to get everyone involved this morning. Just, I know historically, Jeff, you've maybe let's call it the last couple years, maybe a little longer, you've been pretty negative on bank M&A and been adamant that, you know, the organic growth opportunity was significant, and you guys clearly executed on that. As we think about the next phase of Univest's growth here, the next few years, you know, obviously right now, the bank M&A environment is really tough, but as we think about 2024 and 2025, and the current funding environment and rate environment, does bank M&A come back into the conversation more, you know, assuming some of the basics, like around your own currency recovery and things like that, or, do you not really foresee any change in your stance on that? Mike, I don't really see any change in our stance. You know, we've had a lot of success doing the lift-out approach. I'm excited about, you know, although Mike said, as he pointed out, we're going to be a little more patient. I'm excited about the teams that we are building in Pittsburgh and Baltimore and what we can do in those markets organically. You know, to go and do an M&A transaction on the bank side with what we've done on the digital front, with what we've done with nCino and a lot of the things that we've put in place, I'm not sure it would be as seamless a transition to acquire a smaller bank at this point as it might have been a few years ago. I think we will continue to focus on the organic strategy, lifting out, growing those markets, getting them up to, you know, a sizable amount, and then continue to look for new places to expand into, as opposed to necessarily, you know, doing an M&A transaction. Got it. Very good. Thank you guys for taking my questions and for the color this morning. I appreciate it. Thanks, Mike. Thanks, Mike. I would now like to turn the call over to Jeff Schweitzer for closing remarks. T hank you, Mandeep, and thank you, everybody, for listening in today. We appreciate your interest in our organization. You know, while it is continuing to be a challenging environment, we're very, very confident of our ability to manage through it and excited about the future of Univest and look forward to talking to everybody again next quarter. Have a great day. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.