Hello everyone, my name is Tamika, and welcome to Viavi Solutions Fiscal First Quarter 2025 earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. I will now turn the conference over to Vibhuti Nayar, Viavi Solutions Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, Tamika. Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Viavi Solutions Fiscal First Quarter 2025 earnings call. My name is Vibhuti Nayar, Head of Investor Relations for Viavi Solutions. With me on the call today is Oleg Khaykin, our President and CEO, and Ilan Daskal, our CFO. Please note this call will include forward-looking statements about the company's financial performance. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations and estimations. We encourage you to review our most recent annual report and SEC filings, particularly the risk factors described in those filings. The forward-looking statements, including guidance that we provide during this call, are valid only as of today. Viavi undertakes no obligations to update these statements. Please also note that unless we state otherwise, all results discussed on this call, except revenue, are non-GAAP. We reconcile these non-GAAP results to our preliminary GAAP financials and discuss their usefulness and limitations in today's earnings release. The release, as well as our supplemental earnings slides, which include historical financial tables, are available on Viavi's website at www.investor.viavisolutions.com. Finally, we are recording today's call and will make the recording available on our website by 4:30 P.M. Pacific Time this evening. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Ilan. Ilan. Thank you, Vibhuti. Good afternoon, everyone. Now, I would like to review the results of the first quarter of fiscal year 2025. Net revenue for the quarter was $238.2 million, which is slightly below the midpoint of our guidance range of $235 million-$245 million. Revenue was down 5.5% sequentially and, on a year-over-year basis, was down 3.9%. Operating margin for the first fiscal quarter was 10%, at the low end of our guidance range of 9.9%-11.7%. Operating margin decreased 90 basis points from the prior quarter and, on a year-over-year basis, was down 240 basis points. EPS at $0.06, at the midpoint of our guidance range of $0.05-$0.07, and was down $0.02 sequentially. On a year-over-year basis, EPS was down $0.03. Moving on to our Q1 results by business segment. NSE revenue for the first fiscal quarter came in at $159.4 million, which is around the low end of our guidance range of $160 million-$168 million. This was mainly driven by slower order pace from service providers for field instruments. On a year-over-year basis, NSE revenue was down 6.5%. NE revenue for the quarter was $141.6 million, which is a 5.6% year-over-year decline as a result of continued conservative spend by service providers and NEMs. SE revenue was $17.8 million and declined 12.7% from the same period last year, driven mainly by conservative spend by enterprise customers. NSE gross margin for the quarter was 60.9%, which is 270 basis points lower on a year-over-year basis. NE gross margin was 60.9%, which is a decrease of 220 basis points from the same period last year due to lower volume and product mix. SE gross margin was 60.7%, which is a decrease of 650 basis points from the same period last year as a result of lower revenue. NSE's operating margin for the quarter was negative 4.6%, which is a 550 basis points decline on a year-over-year basis. NSE operating margin was below our guidance range due to low revenue and gross margin fall-through. OSP revenue for the first fiscal quarter came in at $78.8 million, which was above the high end of our guidance range of $75 million-$77 million, primarily driven by anti-counterfeiting and 3D sensing. On a year-over-year basis, revenue was up 1.7%, driven by strength across all products. OSP gross margin was 55.3%, up 280 basis points from the same period last year, and was primarily driven by higher volume. OSP's operating margin was 39.6%, which is an increase of 180 basis points on a year-over-year basis as a result of a higher gross margin fall-through. OSP operating margin exceeded the high end of our guidance range of 33%-35%. Moving on to the balance sheet and cash flow. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of Q1 was $497.9 million compared to $496.2 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. Cash flow from operating activities for the quarter was $13.5 million versus $50.3 million in the same period last year. During the quarter, we purchased 2 million shares of our stock for about $16.4 million. The fully diluted share count for the quarter was 224 million shares, down from 224.2 million shares in the prior year versus 224.2 million shares in our guidance for the first fiscal quarter. CapEx for the quarter was $7.3 million versus $6.7 million in the same period last year. Moving on to our guidance. For NSE, we are seeing signs of recovery and normalization of seasonality trend and expect a stronger second fiscal quarter. For OSP, we expect a seasonally weaker second fiscal quarter, mainly driven by softer demand in anti-counterfeiting products. We expect the near-term demand for anti-counterfeiting products to be on the softer side as the end customers work down their inventories. For the second fiscal quarter of 2025, we expect revenue in the range of $255 million-$265 million. Operating margin is expected to be 12.4% ± 100 basis points, and EPS to be between $0.09 and $0.11. We expect NSE revenue to be approximately $188 million ± $4 million, with an operating margin of 4.8% ± 100 basis points. OSP revenue is expected to be approximately $72 million ± $1 million, with an operating margin of 32.3% ± 100 basis points. Our tax expenses for the second quarter are expected to be around $7 million ± $500,000 as a result of jurisdictional mix. We expect other income and expenses to reflect a net expense of approximately $3.5 million, and the share count is expected to be around 224 million shares. With that, I will turn the call over to Oleg. Oleg. Thank you. Thank you, Ilan. During the September quarter, our revenue came in at a lower end of our guidance range, with stronger OSP demand partially offsetting weaker NSE demand. The EPS was at the midpoint of our guidance range. On the positive side, we are seeing many of the NSE's traditional end markets showing signs of stabilization. We believe it marks the beginning of NSE recovery and expected will continue into the second half of fiscal 2025. Now, let's look in more detail at each of our businesses, starting with NSE. The NSE revenue in fiscal Q1 declined on a year-over-year basis, driven by softer demand for field instruments and wireless products. Lower September quarter demand notwithstanding, we are seeing positive signs around order stabilization, which imply the beginning of recovery in Q2 and continuing into the second half of fiscal 2025. A bit more color on individual product segments. A decline in field instruments was driven by lower demand from North American cable and service providers. At the same time, there are signs of stabilization and improved order momentum leading to demand recovery starting in the December quarter and continuing into the second half of fiscal 2025. In addition, we are also seeing stabilization in our wireless business and expected to start recovering in the second half of fiscal 2025, which is earlier than previously anticipated. Fiber Lab and production demand was slightly down. September quarter notwithstanding, we expect to see significant growth in this business for the remainder of fiscal 2025, driven by high demand for our 800 Gb and recently launched 1.6 Tb fiber and high-speed Ethernet products. Our Mil-Aero business continued its robust year-on-year growth, driven by growth in mission-critical products, including communication, avionics, and PNT. Lastly, SE was down year-on-year, primarily driven by lower enterprise customer spend. Looking ahead for NSE, we expect a seasonally stronger Q2 across all product segments, with continued gradual recovery momentum in the second half of fiscal 2025. Now, turning to OSP. During the fiscal first quarter, OSP grew on a year-over-year basis, driven by higher demand for anti-counterfeiting and 3D sensing products. Overall, OSP results exceeded the higher end of our guidance range. For OSP, we expect a seasonally weaker second fiscal quarter, mainly driven by softer demand for anti-counterfeiting products. We expect the near-term demand for anti-counterfeiting products to be on the softer side as the end customers work down their inventories. In summary, Q1 notwithstanding, we expect Q2 rebound to be the beginning of gradual recovery. Despite the challenging environment over the last two years, Viavi has continued to invest in advanced products and technologies to maintain our industry leadership. With that in mind, I would like to recognize the Viavi team for achieving two major milestones during the September quarter. The first milestone is the launch of the VALOR Lab in Chandler, Arizona, which will provide test-as-a-service for Open RAN ecosystem. The second milestone is the release of industry's first 1.6 Tb per second high-speed Ethernet testing for AI workloads. These two achievements position Viavi well for the leadership in wireless data center and high-performance computing market segments. Lastly, I would like to thank our customers and shareholders for their continued support. With that, I will now turn it back to the operator for the Q&A. Thank you. As a reminder to ask a question, press star one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask today that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Please stand by for your first question. Your first question is from the line of Ruben Roy with Stifel. Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions. Hi, Oleg and Ilan. Oleg, thanks for going through some detail on the segments and sort of the order momentum. Wondering if you could just drill into any a little bit further and talk about linearity through the quarter. Were the bookings fairly linear, or did that pick up towards the end of the quarter? And then I had two quick follow-ups. Thank you. Sure. Well, I mean, you know, as we start a quarter, we have a backlog, and then there are some expected orders that come in within the quarter. And I would say that largely linearity was pretty much as we expected. But we did have several major service providers indicate they would prefer to start taking product in the second fiscal quarter. Thus, some of the revenue in NSE got pushed out. But what also was very evident is a much bigger engagement and orders looking at Q2, Q3, and a little bit even further into Q4 from not only NEMs and semiconductor vendors, but also from service providers. And we've seen a number of very interesting dynamics emerge. You know, I was talking for the last, let's say, year and a half about this, what I would call a Mexican standoff between all the operators, where they are all signaling to each other that they're not really investing, they're not spending, and what we have seen change during this quarter is a number of big events. I mean, first of all, you saw AT&T became very vocal and very aggressive about their upcoming fiber deployment in calendar 2025, then we saw Verizon went out and actually re-entered the fiber market, buying Frontier, into which they dumped their fiber assets, what, about eight years ago or so, and of course, as the upper telecom players are becoming aggressive in fiber, it actually spurs a lot of the cable providers to accelerate their plans to upgrade or at least make their networks more competitive. With all of that, it's actually all of a sudden, everything went from talk and no action to a lot of action and a lot of discussion on orders placements and things like that, which, you know, truly marked a big pivot in the behavior among the operators. And what's also very interesting is the wireless operators all of a sudden came out of hibernation, I guess, when it rains, it pours, and also starting talking about accelerating 5G densification and deployment, and, you know, actually starting placing field equipment, field test equipment orders, which is usually a good indication of them deploying equipment and expanding the network. So in that respect, we believe we expect the follow-up from the wireless NEMs in the second half of the fiscal year probably to be stronger demand than we initially anticipated. If you may remember, last quarter, we kind of thought wireless would be middle of next calendar year for recovery. I think now we are a bit more positive on it and think it's going to be more of a fiscal second half, which is the first calendar half of next year. So hopefully that gives you a bit more perspective. And by the way, we are seeing the same thing now being mirrored in EMEA and other geographic markets. So I think maybe the interest rate cut in September was one of the critical catalysts that spurred a lot of the money being released into the network upgrades and maintenance. That's great. Thanks for all that detail, Oleg. And you hit on sort of my follow-up, but I guess, you know, just to make sure I understand on the wireless side and sort of the sooner than expected, you know, modest recovery. I was going to ask if that was, you know, sort of project-based. Obviously, we're hearing about AT&T and O-RAN, but it sounds like it's broader than that. And I guess if we're thinking, you know, through that, you know, earlier than expected recovery as we look ahead to the second half of your fiscal year, you know, would you say, and maybe Ilan, you could chime in, that we should think about seasonality any differently, you know, as we think about the second half? And that's all I have. Thank you. I mean, as you know, generally for us, first fiscal quarter and third are the weaker ones. Clearly, to the extent a lot of these indications materialized in the March quarter, NSE may be a little bit stronger seasonally than would be otherwise because we do see some of the orders. I mean, believe it or not, with this rapid order placement, as much as there is inventory in the channel, it's never the perfect inventory in a channel. And for some of the more specialized parts, we actually have lead times longer than eight to 10 weeks. So that kind of puts these orders more into the March quarter rather than being able to execute them in the December quarter. So I think it's a bit early to say, but there's definitely an opportunity for NSE to be stronger in the March quarter than normally would be. Ruben, I would add that we continue, obviously, to monitor the macro environment, I mean, post-election and the kind of interest rates kind of dynamics. I mean, Oleg mentioned earlier, you know, that the first kind of Fed move, I mean, probably was the inflection point, but we have to see kind of how it continues from here, and that will be another factor, so generally speaking, you know, we are thinking about, you know, momentum continuing, but, you know, we have to continue to monitor the macroeconomics. That's right. Understood. Thank you. Thank you. Your next question is from the line of Ryan Coontz with Needham. Hi, thanks for the question. Great to hear carriers are coming alive here with cable and fiber and as well as even wireless, which is a bit of a surprise. But maybe can you touch on your comments around Europe a little more? And it sounds like there's a little movement there. Number one, and the second question is about your 1.6 Tb opportunity with data centers and the AI builds. Can you maybe unpack those a little bit for us? Thank you. Sure. So we'll just take it as two questions, Ryan. So there's no freebies, but it's all right. You can always ask more. So EMEA, well, EMEA was never as bad as North America, but also we do see, I mean, the fiber never really went down because there's a lot of state-sponsored activity to keep rolling out fiber in Europe. But I would say the wireless was particularly hard hit in Europe. And we do see fiber continues to be doing fairly well in Europe and improvement in North. I mean, in many ways, it looks like European carriers kind of look at North America, what North America is doing, and then they kind of follow it. So in that respect, I'd say, you know, we've seen this copycat behavior, right? If U.S. goes down, Europe goes down. If U.S. goes up, Europe goes up. I think it's, in a way, it's kind of a bit of a herd mentality. On the 1.6 Tb, that is, of course, all driven by AI and data centers. An interesting thing, you know, up until 400 Gb per second, it was all driven by telecom operators. And generally, transition node to node was about, I'd say, four to six years, like, you know, from 100 Gb - 400 Gb and then, you know, so on and so forth. What we are seeing with the data centers, that transition period is more like, I would say, three to four years. And it's currently ramping very rapidly with 800 Gb and already a lot of design activity and a lot of pressure to start sampling the 1.6 Tb. And that is all being driven by data centers. So while the telecoms drove 400 Gb deployment and then, of course, data centers kind of joined in on it or piggybacked on it, the 800 Gb and 1.6 Tb, I would say, is 100% driven by chip vendors, by module vendors, and system vendors who are all being driven by the AI data center operators. So in that respect, I think we're already selling this quarter, you know, some of the 1.6 Tb systems mainly to the leading, I won't say which companies, but leading player equipment and semiconductor vendors. And I expect that will accelerate into the next year. But 800 Gb is now really entering the high-volume production. Are these at the 1.6 Tb, are these new customers to you or customers you've always had? They just are taking a bigger slice of the pie? It's a mix. So it's clearly on semiconductor and NEMs. These are the same customers. But what we are increasingly seeing is all these, you know, dozens of fiber optic module vendors in Asia. Is that just for production then, mostly for them, their module makers? Initially, the first 1.6 Tb is, of course, for development, and then we'll transition into the production. I'll say probably late next calendar year. I think most of these 25 will be driven by R&D CapEx for 1.6 Tb with maybe initial production orders for 1.6 Tb towards the end of the calendar year. Got it. Super helpful. Thanks, Oleg. And on the, you mentioned briefly the enterprise world. Sounds like that's still fairly soft. Is that more around Wi-Fi testing typically? And what's that environment been like? This is mainly our enterprise service assurance. It's a software. You know, in reality, most of our customers in that space are big financial services, healthcare institutions-type customers. We've just been seeing a much more conservative enterprise software spending environment, at least for our type of product. So it's, you know, you can have a million plus orders. All it takes is one or two of them push out, and it actually drives quite a bit of volatility. Got it. Great. That's really helpful. That's all I have for now. I'll get back in the queue if I need something or another question. Thank you. Sure. Thank you. Your next question is from the line of Michael Genovese for Rosenblatt. Great. Thanks. Oleg, can you talk at all about cable? How big is your exposure to cable now? And are you seeing a pickup in those orders for the next quarter and beyond? Hi, Mike. Sure. So, I mean, cable is proceeding with upgrades. I mean, clearly, they've had some delays due to some architectural and system level and software delays from their network vendors. But I think it's finally the train is starting to move in the second, like starting in the second quarter. We had some initial sales in the September quarter, I think more coming up now and later. And increasingly, I mean, cable is becoming a bit more muted for us because more and more of the cable orders are fiber orders. So they're all kind of becoming part of our fiber customer base. But I think there's probably one more cycle where you're going to see coax testers. And all our coax testers are now hybrid fiber and the copper. But my expectation is what I'm seeing from a lot of cable vendors. They're starting to look more and more as the service providers. They're investing a lot more into the assurance kind of to ensure higher performance of their networks. They're investing much more into fiber. And incredibly, they're actually even going further than many of the traditional fiber service providers by deploying things like optical monitoring systems to actually, which gives you a much higher level of availability and reliability of your fiber optic network. So we're seeing cable going from kind of moving on up in the world in terms of the high-performance networking. And I wouldn't be surprised if within a year we don't really start. We'll still call them cable because, you know, their origin, but they're really becoming very much in line with companies like Zayo, Frontier, and other fiber operators. Great. Very helpful. And I also want to echo that it's great to see service providers in the U.S., you know, certainly moving in the right direction here. That being said, 3D sensing these days gets very little attention and maybe because it's kind of boring. But let me just ask you for any update, anything we should be thinking about in 3D sensing, what's going on in the market there? Thanks a lot. I mean, it's still very much our anchor customer. I mean, they're doing pretty well. But you know, for us, it's a fairly saturated market. So I mean, we grow if they grow. But we're now seeing, and I mentioned it earlier in the year, we're seeing some early adoption by Android players in China in particular, not so much in Korea, but China of 3D sensing. And it's initially on the high-end models to the extent that it will move more into mid-range and down. And if that happens, it actually could become a quite exciting market for us. But at this point in time, it's too premature to talk about. Appreciate it. Thank you. Sure. As a reminder to ask a question, press star one on your telephone keypad. Your next question is from the line of Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley. Great. Thanks. Maybe a couple of questions. So first question, just on, is there any changes on how we should think about kind of the run rate of the OSP business? You know, any changes to kind of volumes or reprints or how we think about that business? And on the second question, just on SE, understand kind of the enterprise commentary, but just kind of what are some of the green shoots you're seeing on the SE side of the business? Thanks. Okay. Sure. So I would say in OSP, in terms of run rate, clearly, you know, the way we talk about it is the base business, which is anti-counterfeiting. I would say kind of industrial, Mil-Aero piece kind of base. And then we talk about 3D sensing. So I think I already provided color on 3D sensing. I think it's very much, you know, going with the dynamics of our lead customer for that business. And I don't see it really changing going forward. I think it's usually stronger in the first half of the fiscal year and it's a bit weaker in the second half, although it's no longer as asymmetric as it used to be. So it's more maybe like, I'd say, 55, 45, 60, 40 split between half and half. On the anti-counterfeiting, I think there is several things. I would say in the near term, there may be a bit of the lower demand, and it's coupled with some currency redesigns at major economies, and they want to consume all the inventory of the older products that they have before they place the new orders. Then there's also obviously some sanctions that have hit a number of markets that were, I'd say, we used to make maybe, say, probably around $7 million-$8 million a year. So that kind of goes away. So I'd say in the near term, we think the anti-counterfeiting to be more on the conservative side of the spend, probably at least for the first half of next calendar year. And then we do see a number of new designs and new products. Once the old inventory cycle through and the new node is going to production, we expect it to rebound more to its traditional run rate. And then on SE? On SE? So I'd say SE is a story of two cities. I mean, the enterprise, on one hand, it's a very margin-rich, good product, but we've seen, you know, we saw it initially in the March quarter. They said again in September, it's taking longer to get customer acceptances. The spend velocity is a lot slower. So it's a bit on the softer side. On the interesting side, on telecom side, the operators and what I would say more on the private networks, there we are seeing very strong momentum in the business development funnel and orders, which will start converting into revenue in the second half of our fiscal year and then beyond. And I would say AI Ops is really driving a lot of interest in our products. And we do think we will get next year into comfortably in the 20s in terms of quarterly run rate. And from there on, moving higher as the more and more customers start taking acceptance of the AI Ops products. And kind of basically you do the land and you expand and then you dip in. So the initial acceptances are starting to take place in calendar 2025. And from there on, there will be a geographic expansion and the breadth of products, domain products that we are selling expansion. Great. Thanks so much. Sure. Your next question is from the line of Tim Savageaux. Hey, good afternoon. Hopefully I don't get bounced off again here. Before I say congratulations on the outlook in particular, it took a while, but you do seem to be syncing up with this overall positive environment, especially around fiber spend, but more broadly as well. And as you look at that and what's, you know, setting up to be the strong finish to the year for most of the big carriers, you know, you might want to historically call that a budget flush, although you seem to be characterizing it as more sustained than that, you know, with visibility over multiple quarters. I wonder if you could provide some color on that in terms of what you're seeing in terms of the carriers, you know, finishing the year strong, but also extending that recovery and what kind of visibility you have there. So, you know, I mean, I think it's probably less of a budget flush. I would probably say it's pent-up demand because they really haven't done anything in two years. Well, you know, when they start spending, it feels like a budget flush because all of a sudden everybody says, "Look, I need it and I need it now." Well, three months ago, you said you didn't even want to talk, right? So there is some of that. But the reality is they're also quickly realizing, you know, that there are some lead times. I mean, I would not say that there's a shortage of components. It's just, you know, when you don't order anything for a long time to get every, well, you probably can get 95% of what you need. There's always something that probably has some lead time. So, I think there's, you know, to me, that is just fundamental base business, just getting back to what it should have been running as a maintenance, much to the extent they expand the networks and do more buildouts. It's actually all positive because what it does, it basically lifts the base business of Viavi because then it makes our, I would call them speedboats, our much faster growing segments really add to this whole acceleration. Things like our avionics and aerospace business, military business, the Fiber Lab production businesses, these are all becoming quite interesting. And, you know, we're now even starting to see customers approaching 6G topic, which is for advanced development is very positive. But also, you know, seeing the 5G densification finally starting, at least the talk around it is starting to pick up. That's all positive things. So in that respect, we feel pretty good about NSE finally turning the corner. Got it. Good to hear. And if I could follow up on lead times, I imagine, you know, they vary across your business. I would imagine the bigger machines and lab and production tests are a little longer. But if you could, you know, if you want to talk field versus lab or what have you, talk about kind of where your lead times are right now. I imagine they're historically pretty short on the fiber field side. Is that changing given your reference to lead times there, or is it really just a matter of logistics and getting the machine cranked back out? Well, actually, you know, so the more mainstream kind of field product is, the lead times are not extensive. I mean, there's a ton of inventory of semiconductor devices and connectors and all that stuff out there. Where we do feel lead time is a big deal is on the bleeding edge products like 1.6 Tb, 800 Gb. There you need to get things like SerDes, right? And as you can imagine, they're all in very high demand. And their lead times are, you know, you can tell anyone within three to six months, and we tell everybody the more of a bleeding edge product you want, place orders now or deal with, you know, lead times that may be not as comfortable for you. I'd say on the leading node products, like three nanometer, you know, and more aggressive than that, you probably have some, I'd say, three to six months lead time. On anything 400 Gb and below, you can get it turned around pretty quickly. Great. Thanks very much. Sure. At this time, there are no further questions. Presenters, I'll hand the call back over to you for any closing remarks. Thank you, Tamika. This concludes our earnings call for today. Thank you, everyone. Have a good afternoon. This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.