Good morning. My name is Brica. I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Vertiv's Q4 and full year 2022 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. Please note that this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the program over to your host for today's conference call, Lynne Maxeiner, Vice President, Investor Relations. Great. Thank you, Brica. Good morning and welcome to Vertiv's Q4 and full year 2022 earnings conference call. Joining me today are Vertiv's Executive Chairman, Dave Cote, Chief Executive Officer, Giordano Albertazzi, and Chief Financial Officer, David Fallon. Before we begin, I would like to point out that during the course of this call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding future events, including the future financial and operating performance of Vertiv. These forward-looking statements are subject to material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We refer you to the cautionary language included in today's earnings release, and you can learn more about these risks in our annual and quarterly reports and other filings made with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements that we make today are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable as of this date. We undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. During this call, we will also present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Our GAAP results and GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations can be found in our earnings press release and in the investor slide deck found on our website at investors.vertiv.com. With that, I'll turn the call over to Executive Chairman, Dave Cote. Well, 2022 was quite a year of transformation at Vertiv. A year focused on driving price, America's improvement, and progress on a high-performing culture. After a very disappointing 2021, we developed an ambitious plan to turn around the performance of the business over the next four quarters. Q4 results demonstrated marked improvement consistent with the profit profile we shared last February. Our adjusted free cash flow performance, however, was not what it should have been, largely because of working capital. We have consistently said the Q4 2022 performance will position us well for 2023, and we believe that it has. We are increasing our view on 2023 adjusted operating profit guidance, primarily due to foreign exchange. That represents an over 75% increase year-over-year. Our adjusted free cash flow is anticipated to improve significantly because of higher income and less working capital usage. The demand environment continues to look good. We're entering 2023 with significant backlog. Gio's focus on improved execution on everything is already apparent. It's certainly demonstrated in the improved performance in the Americas. I'm very excited about where the company is headed with Gio's leadership. With that, I'll turn the call over to Gio. Thank you, Dave. Thank you very much. I can certainly confirm that already in my initial days as CEO, there has been a renewed focus on executional rigor and productivity, combined with the intensity that fosters a high-performance culture. We are on slide three. 2022 was certainly a story of two halves. The H1, painful, when we did a lot of the hard work needed for acceleration. The H2, strong, with indeed a very strong Q4, the strongest in our history. Q4 organic sales were up 22%, driven by very robust growth in Americas and EMEA. Asia and China, in particular, was hindered by the impact of COVID. We expect this impact to be short in nature. We ended the year again with a record backlog of $4.8 billion, which firmly supports our top line growth projections for 2023. Adjusted operating profit of $211 million was a little short of the guidance range. This is mainly due to the approximately $40 million less volume in China caused by the COVID wave there. E&I performance was also weaker than expected due to some project cost overruns. These headwinds were partially offset by foreign exchange. Although still negative, more favorable than assumed in our previous guidance provided in October. We are pleased by our pricing performance. We were on plan as we realized $135 million of price in the Q4, and we delivered $365 million for the full year. We executed on the commitment we made early last year. There may have been some skeptics who discounted our ability to get price, and that is understandable. I firmly believe that to deliver on commitments is the best way to respond to skepticism, and this is true in general. We demonstrated good sequential improvement in cash in the Q4, but adjusted free cash flow was below expectations. There are reasons for the shortfall, such as delayed collections in China, again, due to COVID. Higher inventory due to some continued supply chain constraints. Because adjusted free cash flow is crucial, we are instilling more rigor, accountability, and discipline in the whole process. David Fallon and I are keenly focused on this. Let's look at 2023. Our guidance has signaled a significant step forward, a significantly improved performance. Our organic sales are expected to increase 15% year-over-year at the midpoint of guidance. Mainly because of foreign exchange, we are raising our AOP guidance from the $730 million-$750 million we announced in October to $750 -$800 million. Over 75% increase year-over-year. We're guiding to $300 -$400 million in adjusted free cash flow, supported by our plan of increased profit and working capital optimization. We will provide additional details around these plans as we make our way through the slides. We execute the year a quarter at a time. It starts with a good execution in the Q1. We have details on our Q1 guidance later in the slide presentation. Let's now turn to slide four. Let's spend a few minutes on the market. Only one change from the October view. We moved cloud hyperscale down from green to yellow in EMEA. This was driven by seeing some market signals that demand may be stabilizing, albeit at pretty high levels. Worth noting in general, cloud and hyperscale providers may swing a bit between building capacity in-house or outsource to co-loc providers. Often the two categories should be looked at together. Our Asian market views remain consistent with last quarter's. We've operated in a quieter market environment in Asia for 2022. I've recently visited Asia, and I have to say I'm pretty encouraged by what I saw and heard on the ground. For example, India is really just at the beginning of what looks to be a meaningful investment cycle. Americas is also consistent with the last quarter market view. Even though cloud hyperscale may be coming off the heights of the last couple of years, they are still growing and investing at healthy pace, and one that supports our trajectory of business. We have discussed periods of digestion before. Certain customers are digesting their capacity. This is a normal part of the cycle, and they typically, quote, unquote, "digest" at different times, which smooths the overall impact in the market. Additionally, spending is being directed to higher density loads, such as artificial intelligence, which demand more compute power and the need for additional infrastructure. We also believe that there is a normalization of orders that is happening as supply chains improve and lead times reduce. As this continues, customers are likely going to return to more normal order behavior. That is good for the industry overall, but may make order comparatives look more negative than what is really happening in the market. We remain cautious on the enterprise. Not that what we're seeing a different dynamic unfolding since last quarter, but more so because we are mindful of the macro around us. We know this segment would typically be the first to reflect a possible recession in the U.S. or at least a period of economic slowdown. This happened in 2020 with economic slowdowns related to COVID-19, so we are staying vigilant. All in all, we remain cautiously optimistic on the market, driven by the continued need for data globally and favorable technology trends like artificial intelligence requiring higher density and more compute power. Now let's move to slide five. Customer demand still feels good. This is also confirmed by conversations with our customers around the world. Levels of investment and demand for our products and services continue to be healthy. We had signaled that Q4 year-on-year orders growth would be negative given a very strong comparison in the prior year. That is what happened. As an example, in full Q21, we experienced an order growth rate of more than 100% in Americas. We expect to see the same in 1Q 2023, with a tough comparison with the prior year, when orders were up 34%. Now an environment where customers return to a more normalized pattern of ordering. We expect Q1 orders to be down double digits. It is hard to provide precision on what double digits could look like, as normalization of order patterns is still unfolding. We continue to have record high backlog and ended the year at $4.8 billion, which is a 49% increase from the end of 2021. This is inclusive of absorbing some order cancellations from a large hyperscale provider. This backlog represents over 70% coverage of the 2023 sales guidance, which is a much higher coverage ratio than we have seen in the past. This is reflective of an industry characterized by a very tight supply chain and still dealing with disruptions. We do think a normalization of the backlog at Vertiv and in the industry in general is starting, and we expect this to continue as customers are seeing gradual improvement in supply chain and associated reduction in lead time. We believe this process of normalization of the backlog will really be quite healthy for the overall market. We delivered on our pricing expectation, as previously mentioned. We continue to exercise the pricing muscle I referred to already on the 26th of October to price for the value we provide to our customers. Inflation was still anticipated to be a headwind in 2023, but we expect to have a net favorable price versus overall inflation impact of approximately $100 million, thanks to the actions and executional rigor we are fostering. Supply chain continues to incrementally improve, but still not without its challenges, especially in the power electronics area. We are moving from a whack-a-mole environment to one where we are in better control. Thanks to the increased supply chain resiliency our alternative component and supplier efforts are enabling. In summary, while we see some mixed signals in the macro, the long-term demand continues to be healthy for our business. We have a bit of a wind at our back relative to price cost. Supply chain is trending a bit better, and we started the year in a very strong backlog position. Visibility is still not great in a dynamic global environment, but we are focused on what we can control. I like where we are starting the year. Our Q4 performance sets us up well for successful 2023, despite navigating what could be a more challenging macro environment. We are strengthening, and I like to repeat this, the operating models and executional rigor in general and certainly around everything cash flow. With that, over to David to walk us through the financials. David? Perfect. Thanks, Gio. First turning to slide six. This slide summarizes our Q4 financial results. Although Q4 results were lower than our expectations, looking at this slide holistically, you can appreciate the marked improvement from a year ago. As both Dave and Gio mentioned, there is still work to do, Q4 adjusted operating profit of $211 million was not only a record high, but a record high by about 40%. Going forward, it's our aim for every quarter to be a record quarter, we are certainly better positioned today to deliver those types of results, in large part due to what we have gone through over the last 18 months or so. With that said, let's look at the Q4 detail. Net sales increased 17% from last year's Q4, and were up 22% organically. This organic growth included 12% from volume and 10% from pricing. Still comfortably within our guidance range for sales, versus expectations, sales were negatively impacted by approximately $40 million from the COVID wave in China, which significantly limited our production in the final two months of the year. Lower sales in China were partially offset by a $30 million foreign exchange tailwind versus beginning of quarter expectations as the euro, RMB, and British pound all strengthened against the US dollar. Adjusted operating profit of $211 million was below our guidance range, and this was primarily due to lower than anticipated volume in China, which should just be timing, and weaker than expected results from E&I. Looking at the macro puts and takes, we realized a $135 million pricing benefit in the quarter, which was consistent with our beginning of quarter guidance, and pricing was partially offset by a $55 million headwind from material and freight inflation, once again, also consistent with our guidance. As a result, we were $80 million price cost positive in the Q4 and $60 million positive for the full year. $165 million higher sales volume contributed $50 million higher adjusted operating profit. Foreign exchange, although favorable versus expectation, was still a $15 million headwind versus prior year. Q4 E&I performance was below our expectations, and this was driven by cost overruns on several large projects and unfavorable mix. The project cost overruns were driven by execution challenges and a lack of visibility on costs. Largely focused within a single manufacturing plant. Both issues are very much fixable and are being addressed as we continue to integrate E&I in the Vertiv processes and systems. While certainly a challenging quarter, and quite frankly a challenging year for E&I, we are still extremely excited about this acquisition. There is likely more tactical work to be done than we originally anticipated. As we mentioned previously on the last call, the potential for sales synergies is much higher than we originally modeled, as evidenced by the near 150% E&I backlog growth during 2022. To support this higher volume, we are actively investing in capacity expansions at existing Vertiv facilities in Mexico and Slovakia as we continue to push E&I products through legacy Vertiv sales channels. Finally, on this slide, we generated $143 million of adjusted free cash flow in the Q4, and that was $135 million higher than last year's Q4. Although a strong year-over-year comparison, adjusted free cash flow was significantly below our guidance range, driven by several factors, including delayed collections in China from the impact of COVID, higher than expected inventory as we continue to manage supply chain constraints while managing a record high volume, and also delayed receipt of advanced payments for several large orders which were pushed into and likely spread throughout 2023. Although Q4 adjusted free cash flow was short of expectations, we continue to make progress in stemming the tide. We burned $380 million of adjusted free cash flow in the H1 of the year, while we generated $150 million in the H2. We certainly were not alone in managing the challenges of inventory in 2022. Unsurprisingly, we saw a similar pattern with inventory, which grew $180 million in the H1, but just $30 million in the H2. There is still much work to do. As Dave and Gio both mentioned, optimizing working capital will be a significant focus for 2023 for Gio, for myself, and quite frankly, the entire company. We believe we strengthened the P&L in 2022. Now we will work diligently to strengthen the balance sheet. Next, turning to slide seven. This slide summarizes our Q4 segment, Q4 segment results, with strong organic sales growth in each of the Americas and EMEA. APAC organic sales were relatively flat, primarily due to COVID. Otherwise, organic sales would have been up about 9%. America's 40% organic growth. I need to say that again. 40% organic growth was supported by 26% volume growth and 14% pricing. Each of these is an impressive number in and of its own. The volume growth was supported by launching additional thermal capacity in Monterrey, while also proactively addressing several supply chain issues, including the qualification of new suppliers. From an adjusted operating margin perspective, all regions were up significantly from last year's Q4, and for the first time, all regions were price cost positive. Americas improvement was the most pronounced, as they were the first region last year to be hit by inflation against an underpriced backlog. They were approximately $60 million price cost positive in the quarter, which demonstrates the significance of the aggressive pricing program put in place at the start of the year. Both the Americas and EMEA adjusted operating margin were above 20% for the quarter, but APAC was not that far behind. Next, turning to slide eight. We added this slide to highlight the turnaround, specifically in the Americas region in 2022. Under Gio's leadership, we saw significant sequential quarterly improvement as that business focused on getting the fundamentals right, improving processes while also holding people accountable by emphasizing a high-performance culture. It's still early innings and still work to do, but we are pleased, yet not satisfied, with the progress to date. Gio borrowed best practices from EMEA and institutionalized those in the Americas. As this slide demonstrates, we are certainly seeing the results. Of course, as a reminder, the Americas region adjusted operating margin just a couple years ago was in the mid-20s. There is still certainly room for significant upside in the Americas, and quite frankly, in all regions, in 2023 and beyond. Next, turning to slide nine. This slide summarizes our full year results. We developed an aggressive framework to transform the business at the beginning of the year, and we made significant progress. We'll touch upon that in the next slide. It really was a story of two halves with each financial metric. Sales were up organically 4% in the H1, but over 20% in the H2. Adjusted operating profit was up $95 million or was $95 million in the H1, but $345 million in the H2. Adjusted operating margin was 3.7% H1, 11% H2. Adjusted free cash flow was a burn of $380 million in the H1, a generation of $120 million in the H2. Although full year results are critically important, the underlying dynamics of the cadence of our improvements through the year are likely more pertinent to understand the Vertiv turnaround story, which we capture on the next slide 10. This slide nicely captures the turnaround executed in 2022. While there were puts and takes along the way, we executed relatively consistent with the profile we presented in February and delivered sequentially improving performance each quarter, improving adjusted operating profit by almost $200 million from the Q1 to the Q4. Of course, our Q4 performance is not an end in and of itself, but it serves as a strong foundation for continued improving results in 2023 and well beyond. Serves as a good segue. Moving from the rearview mirror to the road ahead, let's turn to slide 12, which summarizes our full year 2023 guidance. We anticipate 2023 sales increasing 15% at the midpoint, with approximately 10% from volume and 5% from pricing, of which a significant portion is carryover or based upon enacted price increases. Markets currently remain healthy, and we have a record backlog of $4.8 billion coming into the year. Despite the recent strengthening of the Euro, RMB, and British pound against the US dollar, we do anticipate a full year foreign exchange headwind of approximately $40 million. That includes a $70 million headwind in the H1, partially offset by a $30 million tailwind in the back half. We have raised our 2023 adjusted operating profit guidance range to $750 -$800 million, and that's up from the $730 -$750 million range previously. This change is primarily due to the strengthening of foreign currency from the end of October when we provided that previous guidance. The midpoint of our revised guidance range represents an over 75% increase year-over-year, which is certainly significant. We include a bridge on slide 31 in the appendix that summarizes the drivers of this increase. Gio will touch upon some of the dynamics in a couple pages, but big picture is driven by higher sales, supported by our record backlog and additional pricing, much of which is carryover. These tailwinds are offset by an assumed $175 million of inflation, and this includes labor. About $75 million of labor inflation is included in that $175. Also, a $40 million combined investment in R&D and additional capacity to support higher expected sales in 2023 and beyond. Adjusted EPS of $1.22 represents a 2x increase from 2022. That's mainly driven by the improved adjusted operating profit. Adjusted free cash flow guidance of $300 -$400 million is primarily driven by higher adjusted operating profit and the optimized working capital, which as we mentioned, will be a significant focus going forward. Gio will provide some of the additional color on working capital initiatives in a couple slides, please refer to slides 31 and 33 in the appendix for additional detail on core assumptions supporting our 2023 guidance. Next, slide 13. This includes a summary of our Q1 financial guidance. Our Q1 certainly shows significant year-over-year improvement across all financial measures. Although we realize it's against a relatively easy comparison to a weak prior year Q1. That said, our Q1 guidance continues the trajectory of improvement building off a strong Q4. As a reminder, seasonality in our business generally results in our Q1 being the lowest quarter and our Q4 being the highest. In general, like 2022, sequentially improving quarterly financial performance across each of these financial measures in 2023 is the expectation. Q1 net sales are expected to be up 21%, 25% organically, driven by higher volume and pricing benefits, partially offset by a foreign exchange headwind. Adjusted operating profit is expected to be $125 million at the midpoint, with pricing, volume, and productivity offset by inflation and growth investments. Adjusted EPS improvement is coming primarily from higher adjusted operating profit. Adjusted free cash flows is anticipated to be a use of cash of between $50 -$100 million. Approximately $75 million better than last year's Q1 despite year-over-year headwinds of $20 million from cash interest due to higher interest rates and $20 million simply from the timing of payroll. Like many industrials, our Q1 typically drives a use of cash, and we anticipate generating adjusted free cash flow for each of the remaining quarters in 2023. With that said, I turn it back over to Gio. Well, thank you, David. Thank you very much. We turn to slide 14. We know that this guidance may look aggressive to some. It may as well look conservative to others. I want here to share some points that supports our assumptions, our guidance. Let's start with adjusted operating profit, and let's look at the volume assumptions. We are at the highest backlog coverage point in our history, over 70%. Additionally, there is always a lot more book and ship time and materials, services, spare parts, flow business, parts of the business that transact on a very short cycle and provide additional volume on the year. Our Q4 book-to-bill ratio was 115%, high levels that have characterized the entire 2022. Obviously, some moderation in our book-to-bill ratio is expected going into 2023 as customers return to a more normalized, as we said, order pattern. This supply environment has been improving, and this should lead to a decrease in our need to do spot buys. We believe we have conservative estimates for inflation. We have a pricing plan that is largely already in backlog or based on actions that have already been taken, and we have demonstrated our ability to get price. Let's look at cash flow now. You have heard all of us speak directly about adjusted free cash flow. We know we did not execute well in this metric in 2022. Certainly, the improved adjusted operating profit starts us off at a very different point for 2023. We have reasonable assumptions for elements that typically do not vary too much, like interest, tax, CapEx, and we have strong working capital initiatives. This is a top priority for the organization, and we are managing this very closely. I would reference how we approached price last year. It was all hands on deck, rigor around the process, accountability, and focus on execution. We executed well. The same rigor is around executing the working capital initiatives and the adjusted free cash flow generation. Let's now turn to slide 15. Our focus areas for 2023 are clear. Clear reflection of our priorities. We want the entire team pulling in the same direction. We are working on the culture, fostering a high-performance culture where we do what we say, where ownership is clear, where we hold ourselves accountable for delivering the results, and we reward performance. Culture doesn't change overnight. It is a process. As we strengthen our focus, we have seen signs that a high-performance culture is starting to take hold, and we see that through improved financial results. I've been visiting many parts of the organization lately, including China, India, Mexico, Slovakia, Ireland, the Middle East. I've met many people at all levels, I'm very encouraged by what I see. People who love and care for what they do and care for the company. We have a lot to do, I feel the energy of the organization. Again, pricing, supply chain resiliency, and trade working capital optimization are primary focus areas, and we'll continue to build those muscles, continue to institutionalize this in the organization. This is what high-performing companies do. We still have great potential to operate in a more efficient and effective way across the company. There is no magic wand. It's constant focus on the things that matter and strong operational execution. Rigorous, relentless, pragmatic execution at all levels and starting from the top. I am encouraged by our finish to 2022. The year was certainly not perfect, but there are signs of real progress permeating throughout the organization and, most importantly, showing up in our financial results. Dave Cote started off the call today by indicating 2022 was a year of transformation at Vertiv. I wholeheartedly agree. It is just the beginning. With that said, we will now turn the call over to the operator, who will open the line for questions. Thank you. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. In order to ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for a moment to compile the Q&A. The first question we have from the phone line comes from Scott Davis of Melius Research. Your line is open. Hi. Good morning, everybody. Good morning, Scott. Hey, Scott. I really just have one main question, and it's just related to the order cancellation of the hyperscale customer. Could you give us a little bit more color around that? Is it your experience that these things tend to be one-offs? I mean, I would think that if one customer is canceling, it could be kind of a, you know, a start of a trend, if you will. I'm not trying to be paranoid here, just a little bit color there I think would be helpful. Thanks. Well, Scott, we know that paranoia is always very healthy. We try to exercise paranoia in everything, in everything we do when it comes to running the business almost religiously. This is Giocos. But obviously we're not able to share customer-specific informations. I, I would say it's, you know, it is not unusual sometimes that there are some reconfigurations in terms of what customers decide to do with their, with their, with their in-infrastructure. Having said that, of course, being paranoid, we keep an extremely sharp eye on our orders dynamics. Other than that, what we have signals or signaled, we have not noticed anything extraordinary, let's say, in the dynamics. We will continue to exercise extreme focus there. You know, nothing extraordinary. Okay. Just as a natural follow-up, I mean, you've had a quarter now of kind of order normalization. Historically, is that typically last two to three quarters, or is it something that is a little quicker than that? You know, it's hard to refer to history here because I do not think, and I've been in the industry, as you know, for quite some time. I have never seen anything like what has happened in the industry in the last 1.5-2 years. The magnitude of the combination of lengthening lead times and demand growth has driven a, let's say, a desire to cover longer and longer demand periods of our customers that is absolutely unprecedented. In general, not just Vertiv's customers, in the industry in general. Being able to say how that will undo or normalize, it's very, very hard. Our expectation is that it will probably take 6 months. Hey, this is a guess. We'll keep our eyes open and try to understand how it exactly unfolds. I'll probably be able to tell better in a... That's very helpful. Okay. Best of luck this year, guys. I'll pass it on. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you. Your next question comes from Nigel Coe of Wolfe Research. Thanks. Good morning, and thanks for all the details again. David, going back to the raised guide for 2023, you mentioned FX, which makes total sense, of course, with the US dollar movements. You mentioned E&I, you know, as a timing issue, the larger timing issue. Are you assuming that sort of the lost EBIT at E&I comes through into 2023? Any help in terms of the path of recovery there would be helpful. I wouldn't necessarily call the E&I issue from the Q4 a timing issue. We were referring more to the sales timing for China related to COVID. All those sales were based on orders we have in hand and no guarantee we'll make that up in Q1, but that's certainly just a timing. As it relates to E&I, you know, we certainly expect improvement in 2023 versus what we saw in 2022. I think full year adjusted operating profit for E&I was between 50 and 55. We anticipated 80 at the beginning of this year, and we certainly would anticipate something north of 80 for full year 2023. Okay. That's great. I think if you look at your 1Q sales guide, I think 21%-22% of your midpoint sales coming through, you know, in 1Q is a portion of full year. That's actually the highest proportion we've seen, you know, since, you know, of Vertiv as a, as a public company, going back to 2018. Obviously, we like front-end loaded guidances, but does that indicate sort of inherent conservatism in the way you built up the plan? Or does it indicate some expectation of a slowing in the back half of the year relative to norms? Yeah. That's a good question. I would say, if you look at the risk from a sales perspective in our plan for 2023, and very consistent what we said at the end of the Q3, it's not gonna necessarily be backlog, but it will be related to the availability of supply. In particular, we have continuing challenges with power semiconductors and electronic components. You know, there may be a bit of a hedge in the back half of the year 'cause we don't have great visibility in that market similar to, you know, everybody who is trying to get their hands on those power semiconductors. In addition. You know, there is still a healthy amount of book and ship that is out there for the back half of the year, and we'll have better visibility into that, you know, at the end of the Q1 and probably much better at the end of the H1. Just to be clear, you still expect there to be supply constraints in the back half of the year? Specifically as it relates to electronic components. Gio can speak to the supply environment. One of our objectives on this call is to make it clear that we're not through the supply chain issues, right? I would say many components we purchase are much better than they were, you know, three months ago, six months ago. There are, you know, certainly still challenges on very critical components that we have to, you know, procure across our entire product line, whether that's AC power or thermal. One, you know, in particular is the power semiconductors, there's long lead times there and we don't have great visibility. We do anticipate that improving as we go through the year. you know, our visibility there probably is, in a matter of quarters, not a matter of, you know, looking out what a year is gonna potentially look like. Yeah, I can comment further. Thank you. Thank you, David, and Nigel. We have on the supply side of things two aspects at the same time in parallel. One is us getting, of course, stronger, more robust. As we explained, we have strengthened our side of processes. We have made our supply network and supply base more resilient with multi-source components and multi-source of supplies. But at the same time, the market, albeit improving, is certainly not normalizing that easy to say the same term on the supply side. Especially as David was saying, everything that has to do with the power semiconductors. Power semiconductors are, you know, present in a lot of things, a lot of the components we use. They're not just as such, but components in the components we purchase. We believe we are stronger. We believe we have figured a lot of things out during the course of 2022. By all means, the message is not everything is perfect out there. It's still a complicated market, but we're much better equipped to navigate in that market. Very clear. Thank you very much. Thank you. Your next question comes from Steve Tusa of JPMorgan. Hi, guys. How are you? Hello, Steve. Good. Very well. Can you talk about maybe some of the levers on cash into 2024 and kind of where normalized free cash would land for you guys in the next couple of years? Or maybe not normalized, but you know, where you think you can get to on that number beyond this year? Yeah. Yeah. This is David. If you look at our guide for 2023, and we break down the components, I think page 33 in the appendix. You can see how it's kind of built up. You know, the most important, certainly you got to start with adjusted EBITDA. You know, that's certainly, you know, there'd be an expectation for that to flow through if that's higher or lower than you know, what we're targeting. Putting working capital aside, you know, the other three components, as Gio mentioned, there's some probability of variability there, I wouldn't say significant. You know, certainly if we're more profitable, we'll pay more taxes. That's just kinda how it works. You know, fairly certain that we would... Our CapEx number will come in within a range of what's reasonable with what we guided. You know, interest, we're definitely subject to movement in interest rates. If we have significant upside or slight downside, it more than likely isn't gonna be related to those three components. It's gonna be the working capital component. If you look at the $75 million use for full year 2023, we certainly assume success in some of the working capital initiatives that Gio mentioned. You know, working capital in and of itself will be a headwind due to the 15% organic growth, right? That's just how it works. With that said, you know, it's not hundreds of millions of dollars. It's not a $300 million or $400 million headwind. We're expecting very significant, including our guidance, very significant working capital initiative benefits. That headwind could be $1 million or $200 million. You can do the math. That's based on, you know, what we think sales are gonna be in the Q4 of 2023 versus the Q4 of 2022. We have some provision in these numbers for success with optimizing working capital, but it could end up being a conservative assumption. There's still a lot of complications. You know, you know, the supply chain is not, you know, back to, you know, stable. There's a lot of challenges in front of us, but we're confident with this guidance we have provided. If you look at the $350, versus, you know, if you will, an adjusted net income for the full year, you know, it's probably 75%-80%. We would target in the long run, being in the 90%+ range. It's always hard for an industrial company to get to 100% of, you know, free cash flow conversion if the expectation is to grow 10%-15% a year. With that said, we believe this is a reasonable guide between $300 -$400 million, but there is definitely room for upside if we're able to execute some of our working capital initiatives quicker than what's assumed in the guidance. Right. The short answer to that is 90% is you view as being normalized, 90% of net income. That would be the long-term goal. Yep. 90% of adjusted net income. Can you get there in, do you think 2024? I believe we can. You know, if you look at our issues, they're all very fixable, right? You know, inventory increase this year, that was probably up $250 million. It was definitely somewhat of a chaotic environment. We have a game plan for this year and that also goes for many of the components of working capital. AR, we had some complex, you know, larger orders that we had to process in 2022 with multiple deliverables. Very tactical, you know, very tactical issues that you know, we can address. I feel fairly confident we can get to that 90%, you know, number in 2024 and go forward. Let's get through 2023 first and then we'll provide some insight on what we think, the timing would be for that number going forward. Great. Thanks a lot. Thank you. Your next question comes from Jeff Sprague of Vertical Research. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Hey, thanks. Good day, everyone. Good day. Two questions. One to just pick up where Steve left off. Just thinking about the actual process of deleveraging here, and if there's any leakage in the equation. I know there's always noise at year-end, but it looks to me like net debt only declined by about a third of what the free cash flow was in the quarter. There's kinda like other uses somewhere, which I haven't figured out. I haven't had time today to try to sort that out. Yeah. If you do $350 million of free cash flow in 2023, can we expect something in the neighborhood of deleveraging net cash, you know, net debt, you know, improvement kind of in that range? The significant use outside of free cash flow in the Q4, Jeff, was related to the tax receivable agreement. There was a $75 million payment in the Q4, which takes that off our books completely. If you look at the leverage, if you look at the math at year-end, and you look at a trailing 12-month EBITDA number, I think our net debt leverage is about 5.6, which certainly is much higher than we would like. If you look at that, you know, same ratio looking at a forward-looking EBITDA number, meaning the, you know, approximately $865 million of EBITDA anticipated for 2023, it's about 3.5 times levered. Then if you assume the $350 million of expected free cash flow is used to delever, whether sitting in cash on the balance sheet or to pay down debt, the net leverage gets down to three times. If we execute upon our plan in 2023, there's a relatively quick path to that deleveraging. Our long-term goal is to keep leverage between two and three times, but we're willing to go either below or above that range for specific reasons. You know, in general, if we execute what we have on paper here in 2023, we should be closer to three times levered as we exit 2023. Great. Thanks for that. Then just back to just kind of business conditions. Back on slide five, just the comment that the pricing environment remains favorable in many of our product segments sort of implies it's not favorable in others. Can you just maybe talk about the, you know, the tenor of price on new incoming orders and where there might be softness, if you're implying there is some softness in that statement? Well, there are two different dynamics at play. One, what I mentioned as our pricing muscle, so an ability to better price for the value that we deliver, we deliver to our customers. That's something that will always be there and something that we did not have, at least not with the efficacy that we have now in the past. That stays. I think that shouldn't read the phrase on the negative side. The message is despite in environment in which we see on the cost side in general, moderating inflation, but inflation nonetheless, we still see that in many parts of our business, we still can continue to work the price lever. That's what we're doing. When it comes to 2023 in particular, a big chunk of our price is already in our backlog. That price in our backlog, of course, is very important for us and to deliver on our guidance. Also the price that is not yet in the backlog is a price that we see being realized, with the orders that we are in taking. You know, expect over time, a normalization also in terms of price. When that happens, and it is not necessarily now in the market, because again, the inflationary trends are still there. When that happens, we are better equipped with an ability to price full value. Great. Thank you for the color. Thank you. The next question comes from Lance Vitanza of Cowen. Please go ahead. Hi, guys. Thanks, and congrats on the quarter. I had two questions, if I could. The first is actually back on slide four, the market environment. I was hoping you could drill down a little bit more on the EMEA, which cloud hyperscale, EMEA, which moved from green to yellow. Gio, could you talk a little bit more about what's driving that change? Is it linked to fears around an economic contraction, or has that market just become somewhat saturated? Then I guess, is the next move, do we think is it more likely to be a move from yellow to red, or do we think it's more likely to move back to green? Thanks. Well, as I was saying, you know, we keep a very sharp eye on all the signals. There's a moment in which the order dynamics are indeed very dynamic as we explained during the, as we were going through the deck. We have no signals in this moment that would tell us, in this moment, that would tell us that there is a red looming behind the colors that you see here. Again, well, we keep our eyes wide open in case something changes. When it comes to the EMEA, we see it more of a change of a mix between cloud, hyperscaler, and colocation, as I mentioned in my comments earlier. Again, simply a change of mix between what the hyperscalers and cloud providers build for their own direct infrastructure vis-a-vis what they leave, and the colocation may flip. I would not read dramatically into that. Just saying, hey, EMEA is going through the same type of order normalization that I've signaled and mentioned already. You know, we'll see how that plays out. Okay. Then just lastly for me, or actually, I think it was David who mentioned that with E&I, that there might be a need for some more tactical work there. I was wondering if you could flesh that out a bit. Then with respect to the backlog, I think you said the backlog was up like 100 plus%. Wondering if you could break that out a bit in terms of US versus EMEA versus Asia-Pacific. Thanks, guys. We may not have time to go into the details by region here, when it comes to the backlog. I must say that we are very, very happy about the sales leverage that we are obtaining, expanding, adding the E&I portfolio to the broader Vertiv go-to-market. Indeed, if you will, we've been also quite surprised by how strong the market reaction has been. With that, you know, as David was mentioning, we are expanding capacity. We are expanding capacity quite vigorously, specifically for E&I. The rest is about accelerating the integration and making sure that the same rigorous, executional, approach that we are instigating for Vertiv as a whole is applicable to E&I and continue to drive price. Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Giordano Albertazzi for any closing remarks. Well, thank you. Thanks to all of you for joining our call today. Really appreciate the support, you know, and very much looking forward to reporting out on our Q1 2023 progress. Stay tuned, and again, big thank you. Thank you. The conference is now concluded. Thank you all for attending this presentation.