Good morning. My name is Daisy, I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Vertiv's Q1 2023 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. Please note this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the program over to your host for today's conference call, Lynne Maxeiner, Vice President of Investor Relations, to begin. Lynn, please go ahead. Great. Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Vertiv's Q1 2023 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me today are Vertiv's Executive Chairman, Dave Cote, Chief Executive Officer, Giordano Albertazzi, and Chief Financial Officer, David Fallon. Before we begin, I'd like to point out that during the course of this call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding future events, including the future financial and operating performance of Vertiv. These forward-looking statements are subject to material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We refer you to the cautionary language included in today's earnings release, and you can learn more about these risks in our annual and quarterly reports and other filings made with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements that we make today are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable as of this date. We undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. During this call, we will also present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Our GAAP results and GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations can be found in our earnings press release and in the investor slide deck found on our website at investors.vertiv.com. With that, I'll turn the call over to Executive Chairman, Dave Cote. It's one hell of a debut for our new CEO's Q1, isn't it? I am very pleased with the results we've delivered in the Q1 and our ongoing progress. Gio's Q1 as CEO is under his belt, and his operational focus on delivering results and creating a high-performance culture is particularly noticeable, especially in the Americas. We over-delivered in the Q1 compared to guidance, and we increased the midpoint of our AOP guidance by $25 million, and cash flow was terrific. We entered the year with a very strong backlog. We were able to secure needed parts, and we had capacity in place to deliver a high Q1 sales level. Order rates will be another metric that looks different this year. Gio has some detail in his prepared remarks to explain that. We are constantly focused on the orders rate, and we are encouraged both by the pipeline activity and the pace of investment in our end markets. I've said this for a number of years. There is a true secular growth story at Vertiv, and the work we have done positioning the company for growth and being able to leverage that growth in a meaningful way by getting after margin opportunities while still protecting growth investment makes Vertiv uniquely positioned to create substantial value in the years ahead. It is what attracted me to this asset four years ago, and I'm even more excited today with the runway ahead. With that, I'll turn the call over to Gio. Thanks, Dave. Thank you very much. Good day, everyone. We delivered a very strong Q1 sales, up 35% organically, led by Americas, up over 60%, and EMEA, up 25%. We were able to ship more in Q1 than a typical Q1 as we strengthened our supply chain and increased capacity across the world. In particular, in our Monterrey thermal management facility. We had very high backlogs starting the year. We have the capacity to serve the growing demand of the industry. Orders, excluding FX, were down 23% from last year's Q1. This was in line with our expectations, driven by the comparison with an exceptionally high Q1 2022 and consistent with the orders normalization trend we referred to in February. Book-to-bill ratio was 1x. Backlog remained flat versus year-end 2022, our historical peak. I will further elaborate on this when we review slide six. Our adjusted operating profit was $176 million, which was $41 million higher than the top end of our guidance. The beat was largely driven by additional volume and higher than expected variable contribution margin coming from a combination of manufacturing efficiency and supply chain efficiency. We are raising our full year adjusted operating profit guidance by $25 million at the midpoint, given the strong Q1 results. Adjusted free cash flow was another good story with $25 million cash generation in the quarter, $100 million higher than our guidance. Although pleased with our Q1 performance, we know very well there is still work to do. We are holding the adjusted free cash flow guidance for the year at $350 million, i.e., the previous midpoint, but we understand there is ample opportunity for improvement, and certainly in inventory. We are continuing to strengthen our processes and operational rigor around trade working capital execution. Overall, a good start, and we are squarely focused on delivering the full year, and that is one quarter at a time. Let us turn to slide four. We have no changes to the view on the market from two months ago at the end of February. We are cognizant of the headlines around tech and the general uncertainty around macro environment. We continue to see encouraging pipeline activity. Some cloud hyperscale customers are digesting capacity. Others are using this as an opportunity to accelerate their build-outs. Some hyperscalers are moderating CapEx growth, but this moderate growth is still healthy growth, and we see investment continuing. Additionally, we see some market re-acceleration in the second half of the year, especially in China, which has been softer over the last several quarters. As Dave mentioned, there is significant secular growth story in our industry. This is further demonstrated by the acceleration of everything artificial intelligence in the tech space. We are distinctly seeing the first signs of the AI investment cycle in our pipelines and orders. Vertiv is uniquely positioned to win here, given our market leadership and deep domain expertise in areas like thermal management and controls, which are vital to support the complexity of future AI infrastructures. Let's move to slide five. First and most importantly, markets are in general healthy. Investment continues across markets, hyperscale, colos, enterprise. Our project pipeline remains strong. We review pipeline activity regularly and diligently. Pipeline activity remains encouraging. Q1 orders, including the impact of foreign exchange, declined 23%. There are order dynamics that are important to unfold. We have provided additional details in the next slide. More comments there. Let me go back to the investment in AI. You may have heard it, as generally characterized as the next infrastructure arms race. Vertiv benefits from this race and is an agnostic partner of choice to the race participants. The acceleration in investment in AI will turn into a net infrastructure capacity demand acceleration. This starts to be visible in our pipelines. AI applications demand a net capacity increase in the industry, higher power density, a gradual migration to an air and liquid hybrid cooling environment, and a transition to liquid-ready facility designs. I do not believe there is anyone else in the data center infrastructure space as well positioned as Vertiv, given our expertise, product technology portfolio, infrastructure system view, and advanced control systems. Already today, some AI infrastructure orders are in our backlog, and we are encouraged by the potential that AI represents for Vertiv. Stock supply chain. It is incrementally better. There are still pockets of tightness in electronics, but the relentless qualification of additional suppliers we have driven in the last 12 months is helping us a lot. Inflation. We anticipate metal costs at lower levels in 2023 versus 2022, although they are starting to trend upwards. A more favorable environment on freight, reduced spot buy activity. They're both trending back to historic levels and that are a good offset. I also like to remind that we have built up a robust pricing process that helps us in case of enduring inflation. Indeed, overall price cost is developing according to plan and consistent with expectations. Let's now move to slide six. Let me here elaborate on future Q1 orders, order normalization, and lead times. Indeed, last year's Q1 poses an exceptionally challenging comparison, with orders up 34% from the Q1 of 2021. We'll see some quarter-over-quarter variation due to timing of large projects, but last year's Q1 was exceptional in that sense. We believe order normalization is very real. We talked about this in February 2022. In February. In 2022, the large hyperscale and colocation customers were giving us orders that covered their requirements for extended period. As I mentioned, some going out 18-plus months due to the challenging supply chain and lead time situation in the industry. They wanted to secure the capacity they needed long term. That behavior was particularly pronounced in our thermal line of business. Our lead times are improving, not yet where we want them to be, but much better than last year, we anticipate they will continue to improve going forward. Our lead times are improving, I would say customers are more comfortable releasing orders at a much more normal cadence. This creates short-term air pocket, but does not impact the volume or timing of what we will ultimately ship to customers. Order patterns are just normalizing. This is healthy for our business and the industry. What does that leave us? We are encouraged that our book-to-bill ratio is at 1x, and our backlog remains at the same level we had at the end of 2022, even with an extremely strong shipment quarter in Q1, where organic sales were increased 35%. Worth signaling an approximately 12% three-year order CAGR that reflects good end market demand. We believe that Q1 2023 will remain the most unfavorable year-over-year quarterly comparison in 2023. We believe it improves from here. We still anticipate a reduction in Q2 2023 orders versus prior year, but improving relative to Q1. It is hard to have a crystal ball into second half of 2023, but with what I hear from customers, including what seems to be a forming into a substantial investment cycle for AI, I remain optimistic that year-over-year orders will turn positive when we get to later quarters. Having said that, I'll pass it over to David, who will walk us through the financials. Over to you, David. Perfect. Thanks, Gio. Turning to page seven, this slide summarizes our Q1 financial results. As you can see, we exceeded the high end of guidance for all metrics on this slide, starting with sales, which were up organically $405 million or 35% from last year's Q1. $105 million of this increase was from pricing and $300 million from volume, which was up approximately $100 million versus what we assumed in guidance. A vast majority of this volume increase was based in the Americas as we continue to see significant improvements in supply chain and manufacturing efficiency, and the two are related in that region. It all starts with, and it's supported by a sound SIOP process. Adjusted operating profit of $176 million was $163 million higher than last year's Q1, and $41 million higher than the top end of guidance. This was primarily due to volume leverage and a higher contribution margin percentage driven by the improved manufacturing efficiency in our North American plants as once again, supply chain issues continue to be addressed and process improvements take hold. Of note, at the very bottom of the second gray box at the bottom of this page, we recognized a $13 million charge for restructuring in the quarter, and you can see that on the face of our income statement. In the spirit of winning now and winning later, while we continuously invest in productivity and efficiency projects, we will overdrive these investments when opportunities present themselves. In the Q1, an $8 million one-time gain related to the reversal of an indemnification claim pursuant to the Emerson carve-out provided that opportunity. Instead of dropping this gain to the bottom line, we accelerated restructuring projects costing $13 million, which should drive $20 million of annualized savings, some of which should benefit the later part of 2023. Once again, winning now and winning later. Moving to the right on this slide, adjusted free cash flow of $25 million was $175 million higher than last year and $100 million better than the midpoint of guidance. Improvement versus both last year and guidance was driven by higher adjusted operating profit and significant progress in driving advanced payments from customers. As Gio mentioned, while there is still work to do across all trade working capital categories, we are pleased with the result for the Q1, and we anticipate continued improvement going forward. Finally, on this slide, if you look at the bottom right-hand corner of that last box, we exited the Q1 with a net debt leverage ratio of approximately 4.3x, and that was down from 5.5x at year-end. While net debt did not significantly change, our trailing 12-month adjusted operating profit increased approximately $163 million from year-end as the $13 million from the Q1 of last year was replaced by the $176 million this year. As we reminded folks in February, although mechanical leverage calculations might have rotely, and one could say maybe even lazily classified us as higher leverage, we do not believe that was consistent with the underlying reality, but more a product of timing in our challenged first half of 2022. Based upon our updated guidance, we expect to be between 3.5x and 4x after the Q2 and approximately 3x at year-end, which is at the top end of our 2x to 3x long-term target range. Next, turning to page eight. This slide summarizes our Q1 segment results. The Americas region had year-over-year organic sales growth of 61%, and that's not a typo, including volume of 48% and pricing of 13%. Americas entered the year with a very strong backlog and with improvements in the SIOP process and the supply chain, coupled with the continued capacity ramp-up in our new thermal facility in Monterrey, we were able to drive significant top-line volume growth. EMEA also benefiting from a strong backlog posted organic growth of 26%, including 17% from volume and 9% from pricing. APAC is somewhat an outlier compared to the other two regions for the Q1. While we had good growth in India and Southeast Asia, China continued to be impacted by the effects of the post-COVID recovery and related project pushouts to the Q2 and back half of the year. Based upon our visibility to an improving pipeline driven by the anticipated macroeconomic recovery and government-sponsored actions that should benefit data centers, we remain optimistic, anticipating mid to upper single-digit organic growth in APAC for 2023 and good momentum heading into 2024. At the bottom of the slide, Americas continued its momentum from the second half of 2022, with adjusted operating margin of 22.1%, 11.3 percentage points higher than last year's Q1, and 160 basis points better than the Q1. About half of the improvement was driven by higher variable contribution margin, including a significant price cost benefit, with the other half from fixed cost leverage as we continue to drive our fixed cost constant philosophy while investing in capacity and technology. EMEA adjusted operating margin also improved nicely from last year's first quarter by over 700 basis points, with about half of that improvement from fixed cost leverage. Finally, APAC, their adjusted operating margin, like its top line, remained relatively flat from last year. Turning to page nine. This slide summarizes our Q2 guidance. As we mentioned in our press release, due to our strong beginning of the year backlog and an improved supply chain, we anticipate quarterly seasonality to look a bit different in 2023 compared with historic patterns. As a result, we are not projecting as a significant incremental jump in top line from the Q1 to the Q2, like prior years, and we should see a more uniform quarterly sales pattern, albeit increasing as we sequentially move through 2023. For the Q2, we anticipate organic sales growth of 15%, with 9% from volume and 6% from pricing. We are projecting adjusted operating profit of $190 million at the midpoint, with pricing, volume, and productivity benefits partially offset by inflation and growth investments, with the resulting adjusted operating margin up 600 basis points from prior year. We have not provided adjusted free cash flow guidance for the Q2, but we expect positive cash flow in each of the remaining quarters with sequential increases, and we reiterate our full year guidance on the next slide. Which is a good segue moving to the next slide 10, where we summarize our full year guidance. We have raised our, as Gio mentioned, we have raised our 2023 adjusted operating profit guidance by $25 million at the midpoint, building on our strong Q1 performance. Although we experienced favorable supply chain dynamics in the Q1, there remains uncertainty in certain pockets of our procurement, including notably power semiconductors. We are approaching volume estimates for the rest of the year with caution. This may be perceived as conservatism, but we believe it is the prudent approach at this point based upon the supply chain volatility we have all seen in the last 18 months. We know, things can change quickly. We are guiding full year adjusted operating margin of 12.3% as we continue our progress towards an anticipated 16% in the intermediate term and 20% in the long term. As I mentioned, we are reiterating our adjusted free cash flow guidance for the full year, of $350 million at the midpoint. That said, I turn it back over to Gio. Well, thank you. Thank you, David. Let us, let us then turn to slide 11, let's summarize the key takeaways. Very good Q1. Momentum is continuing. Market remains healthy, and we benefit from having a large backlog and a better supply chain and more capacity. We are raising our AOP guidance, given a good Q1 performance. I am very pleased to announce Vertiv will be hosting its first investor conference on November 29th at the New York Stock Exchange. More details certainly to come, but already now hope you have penciled this down your calendars, and we hope you will be able to join us. As Dave Cote is known for saying, "The trick is in the doing," and we are getting after the doing. That means a strong execution supported by a high-performing team and culture. Make sure there are no shortcuts, no magic wands. The doing is clarity of vision, alignment, and relentless focus on improvement and execution. I am very proud of the step forward we continue to take as an organization. I want to thank the entire Vertiv team for the ever-increasing focus and passion on execution. We're still in the early stages of our acceleration. After my Q1 as a CEO, I'm more optimistic than ever about our path ahead. With that, we will now turn the call over to the operator, who will open the line for questions for us. Thank you very much. Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star followed by two. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure you are unmuted locally. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A. Our first question today is from Andy Kaplowitz from Citigroup. Andy, please go ahead. Your line is open. Good morning, everyone. Morning, Andy. Morning. Morning. Gio, could you give us a little more color into your end markets and elaborate on your comments that you think orders could turn positive later this year? I think, you know, some investors are probably surprised that cloud and colocation markets in the Americas have hung in as well as they have. Maybe more specific color on those markets. How much of the incremental orders or pipeline that you see are would you say more AI-focused? What gives you the confidence that China is going to come back in the second half of the year? Okay. Well, thank you for your question, Andy. I would say that the many elements for this confidence, one is what we see in the pipelines and pipelines are moving. We are definitely pleased by our book-to-bill ratio at one, as we were saying, especially given the overage in sales relative to Q1 guidance. As I said, you know, especially the hyperscalers are not stopping their investment. We also heard some prominent hyperscalers in the last few days sending messages about their infrastructure spend. There is, you know, positivity in the air. Again, that resounds with our, with what we see in the pipeline. We talked last time about normalization, and that's what we continue to see. Do not be surprised, when we will see still a Q2 that on a comparative basis, will be down year-on-year, but up in absolute terms versus Q1, as we were saying. Again, the there is movement out there. There is positivity. Not all the hyperscalers are exactly in the same place or all the colos are in the same place, but many of the large ones are continuing to plan capacity expansion. It is difficult to your point about AI. It's difficult to really draw a line between, you know, AI investment, enabling investment and other investments. I would say that the line is blurring. One would think that AI is a totally new thing. Certainly generative AI is accelerating very rapidly. You know, there are elements in AI in everything we do today already. If anything, we see an acceleration, not a sharp transition to something completely new. We see AI in terms of the type of conversations and specifications that we see coming our way. Again, as I was saying, when going through the slides, a lot about power density and a lot about bigger capacity investment, kind of bigger chunks, that's encouraging. Again, AI as a transition, and I invite everyone to think AI as more in terms of a transition towards a higher density compute and higher density power as a consequence. You were asking about China. We believe China will re-accelerate in the second half. The best indicator, two indicators. That's what we see, you know, other market, other industries and China in general as an economy saying and trending towards. Also we see it quite clearly in our pipeline. Our pipelines are strongly accelerating in China. Hope I answered the question. You did, and I asked in four parts. Gio, just a little more color on free cash flow. Obviously much better than your initial expectations for Q1. We know it's your, you know, one of your top focuses, if you're not your top focus this year. You didn't raise the guide, as you said. Is that just sort of prudent? What have you really changed so far this year about, you know, collecting cash? Yeah, multifaceted question. I'll ask also David to chip in at a certain stage. I would say that when we look at Q1 is really a combination of better AOP, better profit certainly help, and the other are kind of our payments, advanced payments that help. We know that we have work to do on the trade working capital and we are focusing on that. For us, that means, you know, concentrating especially on inventory and for us, inventory reduction and inventory optimization means working intensely on supplier retime, reduction, execution in everything that is a SIOP material planning, material management production planning, vendor management in general. We are activating a lot of vendor-managed inventory agreements, all things that will go in the direction of shortening the cycle. As the cycle shortens, our inventory go down. I was talking about supply chain resiliency, that's a big element. Supply performance is a big element because we can reduce our safety stock without impacting our service level, et cetera. It's a system. It's an array of actions, and I think that touched upon the most important. David, anything else to add? Of course, it's not just inventory, there are many facets. Yeah. I think the important thing Gio mentioned, the beat in the Q1 was driven by higher profitability and the advanced payments. The advanced payments were super focused on that, but that's a matter of timing. We have to prove that execution over and over as we get through the year, it will just be accelerating cash we would've received later into the year into the Q1. We'll have a better update in three months from now. At this point, we're still very comfortable with that $300 million-$400 million guide. Appreciate all the color, guys. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question is from Nicole DeBlase from Deutsche Bank. Nicole, please go ahead. Your line is open. Yeah, thanks. Good morning, everyone. Good morning, Nicole. Morning, Nicole. Maybe we could just start with the Americas, obviously, like, the biggest source of the beat and really impressive growth this quarter. Can you just talk maybe about how you see that phasing throughout the rest of the year? I suspect that 60%+ organic growth probably isn't sustainable. I would say that we have been able to overperform in the Americas. We were talking about, of course, the 60%. If you think about what the details Dave, David gave us with a 48% volume. Think about almost a 50%, 50% volume is certainly a reflection of a much more reliable supply chain. Absolutely not perfect yet, as I was saying. You know, a very, very importantly, an availability of capacity that we did not have before. We have more capacity now than we had in the past, and certainly a lot more capacity to serve an industry that needs capacity. We in the Americas have done, we have approached the improvements in the Americas many angles, alignment, talent, leadership, capacity, processes, fixed supply chain, a lot of price, price. We continue to have a strong backlog, also in the Americas. Comparatives will be a little bit more challenging, but we continue to see growth for the rest of the year. The strength of the Q1 was not a fluke. It was simply. Okay. Let's say simply a reflection of all the hard work and the investment and a transformation of a business and a culture towards a strength that we did not certainly have a year ago. Got it. Maybe it's fair to say that if you guys are, you know, making the claim that for the whole business, there's less seasonality this year, and revenue can be kind of stable throughout the year versus what you reported in Q1, that comment may also apply to the Americas. Is that a fair characterization? Very much so. Very much so. You know, our business, normal business, if there is such thing as kind of a pre-COVID normal, would have, would have shown always a kind of a very steep second half or towards last quarter type of seasonality. It will be much flatter here across the year and particularly for the Americas. I don't know, David, anything you wanna add? Yeah. Nicole, just to help with your modeling. You have all the components to look at first half, second half. We definitely, you know, we still see a $250 million-$300 million increase in sales in second half versus first half. We do anticipate more uniformity than in prior years. If you look at it from a regional perspective, most of the lift that you'll see in the second half will come from APAC. You know, the Americas and the EMEA would be relatively uniform. Okay, thank you. That's helpful. Just as a follow-up, with all of the news about, you know, potential credit crunch, can you guys just talk about how concerned you are about a tighter financing environment potentially impacting project activity in the data center space? Thank you. In this moment, again, the thing that we keep an eye on is really what our customers or our customers tell us, what we see in the pipeline. You know, it's hard for us to speculate on the consequences of the consequences. It's hard to tell. What we think is that the biggest portion of our market, so everything related to hyperscale, but not only colocation, seem not to be extremely bothered by this at this stage. Thanks. I'll pass it on. Thank you. Our next question is from Scott Davis from Melius Research. Scott, please go ahead. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, everybody, Gio and David and Lynn and Mr. Cote. Good to see you. Stock price up. Let's, if you don't mind, Gio, I'd love to go back to AI and because this is all so new to so many of us, and the materiality of the comments is always hard to really get our arms around. When you think about the faster the thermal management, the faster switch, you know, the faster speed switches and all the stuff that might be necessary, are your orders just for a different mix or a higher end mix of new, or are you talking about retrofit, and there's some demand there to go back into existing data centers and upgrade, perhaps at a faster clip than you'd anticipated prior? Hello, first of all, Scott, and thank you for the question. I'd say quite insightful question, in the sense that in this moment it's predominantly a new infrastructure conversation. I as a CEO, but Vertiv as a whole, we're extremely intrigued by the opportunities out there because there is a lot of large data center stock, of course. Thinking that it all the high density will be brand new into an existing data center infrastructure, which certainly happen, but it's solely happen in that dimension. No. We believe that the opportunity for retrofits will be there. A bit premature, I must say. One thing I'm sure, you know, we are extremely well positioned there. Because in the existing stock of data center globally, we have a big installed base, so no one better than, you know, current vendor can help you transition to the new technology. But also again, because it's if you think about our global presence or service domain knowledge. One thing is interesting, as I alluded to probably a little bit too rapidly in when we're going through the slides, is that when I talk to our customers, rarely do they think binary in terms, "Oh, it's all AI. Oh, it's all the new infrastructure is all very high density." They both think about an infrastructure that needs to be resilient over time and enable a transition of technology that will probably last 10 years. This mix and change of mix is very, is very intriguing, it's very interesting and very promising for us at that. Gio, just to be clear. Yeah. Oh, I'm sorry. Go right. Were you gonna jump in there, David, or? Oh, I'm sorry. No, go ahead. I must have bad connection. let me I just, you know, I hate to ask a question. I think I know the answer, and it may be stupid, but when you think, when you talk about an order that's coming in in a facility that needs to be, manage the power density of AI, are you talking about a larger bill of goods or with a higher margin mix or, you know, kind of help us understand. What magnitude is it? You know, is it, is it 10% more intensity of Vertiv products? Is it double? You know, is there, is there some sort of way to think about TAM as it relates to what may happen here and the changes necessary to accommodate AI? I would say the investment is not marginal in terms of portion of infrastructure. I would say that the total accessible market is not, certainly not shrinking. If anything, expanding. Again, you have to think system and not just a individual piece of technology, more in the future than today. We can think system. Okay. All right. I appreciate it. Thank you, guys. Best of luck to you. Sure. Thank you. Our next question is from Nigel Coe from Wolfe Research. Nigel, please go ahead. Your line is open. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. We've had a pretty decent conversation about AI, so I wanna switch to the more prosaic enterprise market now. I mean, you know, we've seen some negative data points on enterprise IT spending, so just curious, recognizing the fact that your outlook hasn't changed by end market, but on balance, have you seen a more cautious, you know, enterprise customer out there? Maybe just bring us up to speed in terms of where we are on that migration path from on-prem to cloud. Hello, good day, Nigel, first of all. The migration is continuing, but it's, again, it's not from a 100% on-prem, 100% cloud. I'd say that there are elements of stabilization. Clearly, migration continues. We see the enterprise business growing a single-digit in this moment. More or less, that's what we see also through our channel business, that by the way, is in a good health right now. Think about enterprise business also as not just data center, but we see also enterprise demand on the commercial and industrial part of the business as a consequence of trends like nearshoring. We see good level of activity there. Okay. It doesn't sound like you've seen any deterioration there. Okay. Maybe just to talk about the pipeline. You talk about a very encouraging pipeline, especially in China in the second half of the year. When you think about the visibility and your confidence in future backlog growth, would you say the Americas are still the place where you feel more confident in the outlook? More confident than other places, or, you're asking? Where the pipeline is stronger. Yeah. Where, which way do you see the most sort of vibrant pipeline? I would say that clearly the size of the pipeline is different in different regions, reflecting the markets that we serve. We see pipeline particularly effervescent, if you will, in China and in Asia. We see good level of pipeline supporting our plans in the other parts of this in Europe and in EMEA and in the Americas. I'd say that I am positively encouraged. I'm encouraged by the size of the pipeline and by the speed at which we are creating new pipeline. Great. Okay. Thanks. Thank you. That's great. Sure. Thank you. Before we take our next question, I'd just like to ask everyone to kindly ask one question, so we can allow everyone the chance to ask theirs. Our next question is from Mark Delaney from Goldman Sachs. Mark, please go ahead. Yes. Thanks for taking the question. Congratulations on the good results. Thank you, Mark. I had one on the pricing outlook for 2023. You're now expecting a bit higher pricing than you assumed as of last quarter, and you're doing it with less volume. Can you speak a little bit more on where the pricing's coming from and what's leading to the higher price for 2023? Thanks. Thanks, Mark. You're right. We took our full year pricing guide up from $275- $300. We hit the number in Q1, you know, there's always a little bit of art as it relates to defining what pricing is. When we look at our backlog and run the numbers versus last year, they're coming up higher. We continue to be successful with our new pricing. I think the incremental $25 came from, you know, a recalculation of the carryover, but the big thing with the pricing is it's not turning the other way. The pricing in the market, you know, certainly in the Americas and EMEA, it's sticking and, we're, you know, continue to be out there and we think we're kinda at the right price point, but we will continue to push it a little bit. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question is from Jeff Sprague from Vertical Research Partners. Jeff, please go ahead. Your line is open. Hello. Good day, everyone. Good day, Jeff. Hey. How you doing? If I'm gonna do one, maybe just go to free cash flows. You know, David, you pointed out maybe people were a little too nervous about your leverage. But I did wanna just get to the point of conversion. You know, your free cash flow, the EBITDA is about 40% or so. You know, a lot of companies in my group kind of operate in the 60% range or so. How do we, you know, kind of get that conversion relative to your EBITDA higher? Are there, you know, any things in particular that need to happen? I think working capital is probably a big chunk of it, but maybe you could bridge us to, you know, potential improvement in the outyears on that metric. Yeah. We talked about this a little bit on the Q1 call. Our long-term goal, of course, every industrialist get to 100%. That's very dependent upon growth because trade working capital is the biggest drag. I think if you look at the metric, you know, based on 2023, and you have to look at adjusted net income, it's probably 75%. The two biggest drags versus, you know, getting to 100% is working capital. Then also we're over-investing this year with CapEx. Our depreciation, if you include software amortization, is probably close to $90 million-$95 million, but we have $140 million of CapEx, a lot of that which is supporting, you know, additional capacity. In the long run, that has to stabilize just mathematically. That will, you know, probably close maybe a little less than half of that gap. In the long run, your point is absolutely right on. It has to be work with working capital. We made some progress here in the Q1, and we project that will continue to make progress over the rest of the year. In the long run, to hit that target, we're gonna have to continue to optimize inventory and balance out AR and AP. Great. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you. Our next question is from Amit Daryanani from Evercore. Amit, please go ahead. Your line is open. Yep. Thanks for taking my question. You know, I guess, my question is really on the backlog side, the $4.8 billion backlog. I'd love to understand how do you think that looks into year-end? I'm just trying to get a sense of how much of the growth do you think this year is gonna come from backlog conversion versus not? Anything you would call out in terms of cancellation, something would be really helpful. Separately, Gio, I'm hoping you could talk a little bit on this AI dynamic. you know, a lot of the hyperscale companies I think at this point are debating if they wanna do 100% immersion liquid cooling or hybrid cooling. Do you think your value proposition is as attractive in the immersion liquid cooling market as it's on the hybrid side? Thank you. Many questions in one. Thank you. Thank you, Amit. First of all, the backlog. Clearly $4.8 million is a good number, as we were saying at the beginning. Let's go back to February when we were saying we are entering 2023 with more than 70% backlog coverage, and that's not normal, quote-unquote. We still believe that is the case. I mean, if you go back to whatever the normal would be, we would be probably on a 50% or below 50% backlog coverage. I'd like to think in terms of percent, not necessarily absolute number. Probably when we go into 2024, we will be more on, most likely we will be in a lower coverage than the 70% we saw last year. Now it's a little bit premature really to say how everything will pan out, but think in terms of a lower backlog coverage going forward. Again, that's normal. We talked about lead times. We talked about the reduction of lead time. With the reduction of lead time and the levels of backlog coverage that we had at the beginning of 2023 are incompatible. Simply, the industry will adjust again. Clearly a lot of the revenue in 2023 comes from backlog conversion, but that's just in the math, in the numbers. You're talking about cancellations. We're nothing out of the ordinary. Let me talk about cooling technology. As I was saying earlier, it will be a hybrid world from a cooling technology standpoint, and the degree of the mix between traditional and liquid will probably change over time. Very, very small percent of liquid at the beginning and then increasing in the next years, I would say. Certainly not months, years. You were talking about immersion cooling. Immersion cooling is just one of the liquid cooling technologies. There are a lot of other technologies that in this moment are competing in a technology landscape that is not mature yet. We are working with some of the biggest hyperscalers and some of the biggest chip manufacturers to really make sure that we align our technology to their evolution, and then we make sure that we enable their scaling their solutions out in the market. Perfect. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question is from Lance Vitanza from TD Cowen. Lance, please go ahead. Your line is open. Thanks, guys. Nice job on the quarter. My question is with respect to E&I, as the supply chain has continued to improve, is E&I a drag still, or has it become a tailwind in the Q1 results, and how do you see that playing out? Related to that, strategically, are there any other potential acquisitions out there, perhaps tuck-ins, that would allow Vertiv to further improve the scope of its product offering and its competitive positioning versus some of the other larger players? We are happy with the progress on the E&I side of the business. I think it was February when I was talking about making sure that we accelerate integration. We have taken steps in that direction. In particular, we are embedding the American part of the E&I organization in the bigger Americas business also operationally. We're satisfied with the progress there. When it comes to portfolio management in general, it would be anyway premature. Be sure, rest assured that this is something we keep a keen eye on, and it's a part of our management cadence and processes. We certainly are constantly looking at opportunities out there. Sometimes they are mature, sometimes they are not mature, but that's part of what we do. Thank you. Sure. Thank you. Our next question is from Patrick Baumann from JPMorgan. Patrick, please go ahead. Your line is open. Hi. Thanks. David, maybe a quick one for you. The free cash flow in the quarter, I think you said there was an advanced payment benefit, maybe that's reflected as deferred revenue, I don't know, in the cash flow statement. It sounds like this could be timing related based on some of your comments, so it would be helpful to get a sense on. Yeah. Second quarter expectations for free cash flow. Not something that. Yeah. Gave on the slides, you typically give kind of the forward quarter outlook. First of all, advanced payment could be timing if we do not execute, and we have every intention and plan to execute. You're absolutely right. In the balance sheet, it hits deferred revenue. We have programs in place, notably in Americas, to continue that program with larger orders. It's something that we have embedded in the process. We're very optimistic that that will continue. To embed that into the guidance, we're gonna wait for three, you know, three months, another quarter to kinda reassess that. As it relates to, you know, individual quarterly guidance for free cash flow, I think historically we have not provided that. We did last year. We are not doing that just because of the lumpiness and some of the variability around free cash flow for individual quarters. As we mentioned in the past, we have $40 million-$50 million check runs that could go out one day versus the next and swing a quarter. I wouldn't read much into that. We're still very confident with the free cash flow program. We do anticipate it to sequentially increase as we move through the year, and we'll reassess that guidance as we get to the end of Q2. Okay, thank you. Yep. Thank you. This is all the questions we have time for today, so I'd like to hand back to Giordano Albertazzi for any closing remarks. Well, thank you very much, and thank you for your questions. We are starting off the year with a strong quarter. We certainly intend to continue to build on that momentum as we make our way through 2023. We definitely look forward to discussing our progress with you. Appreciate your support, and don't forget, looking forward to seeing you on 29 November 2023. With that, thank you very much. Thank you everyone for joining today's call. You may now disconnect your lines and have a lovely day.