Greetings and welcome to Vitesse Energy's call to discuss the fourth quarter and full year 2024 earnings. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow a formal presentation. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to the Director of Investor Relations and Business Development at Vitesse, Ben Messier. Thank you. You may begin. Good morning and thank you for joining. Today we will be discussing our 2024 results and the expectations for 2025, including the impact of the acquisition of Lucero Energy Corp, which closed last Friday. Our 10-K in earnings were released yesterday after market close, and an updated investor presentation can be found on the Vitesse website. I'm joined here this morning by Bob Gerrity, Vitesse's Chairman and CEO, our President, Brian Cree, and our CFO, Jimmy Henderson. Before we begin, please be reminded that this call may contain estimates, projections, and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. Please review our earnings release and risk factors discussed in our filings with the SEC for additional information. In addition, today's discussion may reference non-GAAP financial measures. For reconciliation of historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, please reference our 10-K and earnings release. Now I'll turn the call over to Vitesse's Chairman and CEO, Bob Gerrity. Thanks, Ben. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for participating in today's earnings call. In 2024, we continued to deliver on our mandate to return capital to shareholders. It was a good year. We increased our dividend in June and have now paid $4.07 of dividends per share since our spin-off in January 2023, while converting our undeveloped asset base to producing wells and sourcing highly economic deals, at the same time maintaining a conservative balance sheet. Last week, we closed the acquisition of Lucero Energy Corp in a stock-for-stock transaction. We expect this transaction to be immediately accretive to key financial metrics, bolstering the dividend and further strengthening our balance sheet. With Lucero now closed, our board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.5625 per common share to be paid on March 31st. That's $2.25 per share on an annualized basis. This represents a 7% increase to the dividend sequentially. Our board of directors has increased to nine members, with Gary Reaves and Bruce Chernoff joining the Vitesse board from Lucero. Their deep knowledge and experience will complement our board nicely. I want to thank all the team members who have worked so diligently on this transaction, both from Lucero and Vitesse. The hard work on both sides was key to its success. For 2025, our strategy is consistent. We will continue to return capital to shareholders via the fixed dividend and allocate capital based on our returns-based hierarchy. We are well positioned to pursue additional acquisitions. I will now hand the call over to our President, Brian Cree, to discuss our operations. Good morning, everyone, and thanks, Bob. Production for the year was just over 13,000 bbl of oil equivalent per day. We expect production for the first quarter to be between 14,000 bbl and 15,000 bbl of oil equivalent per day, with a significant increase in the second quarter as Lucero was closed in March. As of December 31st, 2024, we had 17.7 net wells in our development pipeline, including 9.7 net wells that were either drilling or completing, and another eight net locations that had been permitted for development. The Lucero assets include 1.9 net wells that are waiting on completion and another 5.3 net locations that have been permitted for development. We currently plan to begin completion activities on the 1.9 net wells later this spring. At year-end, prior to incorporating Lucero, total proved reserves for Vitesse were 40.3 million barrels of oil equivalent. Proved developed reserves were 27.2 million BOE, while proved undeveloped reserves increased 8% to 13 million barrels of oil equivalent. Proved undeveloped reserves are limited to those locations that are reasonably certain to be developed over the next five years. However, we believe our acreage also includes extensive undeveloped drilling and completion locations not currently classified as proved. Vitesse's total proved reserves at year-end had a PV-10 value of $586.6 million, with 78% being proved developed. Year-end 2024 reserves were impacted by the reduction in the net realized oil and natural gas prices used in accordance with SEC rules. Net realized prices decreased by $4.09 a barrel for oil and $0.51 per MCF for natural gas between 2023 and 2024. Including our internal estimates of Lucero reserves using the same pricing, the pro forma PV-10 value would have been just over $800 million. To mitigate the impact of these commodity price changes, for 2025, we have approximately 53% of our oil production hedged at a weighted average price of $71.16 per barrel at the midpoint of our guidance. For the first time since going public, we added natural gas hedges to take advantage of the increase in natural gas prices and the call skew present in Henry Hub costless collars. We have 15% of our natural gas production now hedged at a weighted average floor of $3.73 and a weighted average ceiling of $4.88 per MMBtu, again, based on the midpoint of our guidance. For the same volumes, we swapped a basis differential to increase the effectiveness of our natural gas hedge. In addition to these volumes, we have over 2,500 barrels per day and 8,000 MMBtu per day of our 2026 oil and natural gas production hedge at roughly $67 per barrel and through a costless collar of $3.71 by $4.47 per MMBtu. Thanks for your time. Now I'll turn the call over to our CFO, Jimmy Henderson. Good morning, everyone. Thanks, Brian. I will provide a quick review of our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2024, as well as an update on our financial status. Please refer to our earnings release and 10-K, which we filed last night, for any further details. Our production for the quarter was just under 13,000 BOE per day with a 68% oil cut. This brought our total 2024 production to 13,003 BOE per day with a 69% oil cut. These amounts were just within guidance as some of our larger working interest wells were not brought online during the fourth quarter but shifted into early 2025. For the year, adjusted EBITDA was $156.8 million, and adjusted net income was $35.7 million. GAAP net income was $21.1 million, and you can see the reconciliation of that in our press release that we filed last night. Cash CapEx and acquisition costs combined for the year were at the midpoint of our revised guidance of $115.2 million. These costs were funded within operating cash flows as well as draws on our credit facility. At the end of 2024, we had total debt of $117 million, with net debt to adjusted full year EBITDA of just 0.7 x. In connection with the closing of Lucero, we increased our borrowing base to $315 million, with the aggregate elected commitments also increased to $250 million. Thanks, as always, to all of the banks in our syndicate for their continued support. The Lucero closing further strengthened our balance sheet as they had no borrowings and held a net cash position of approximately $50 million at the close. This transaction also had the benefits of increasing our public float while maintaining meaningful insider holdings. Vitesse insiders now own more than 25% of the company. We are also providing guidance for 2025. On a two-stream basis, we anticipate production in the range of 17,000-18,000 BOE per day for the full year, an increase of approximately 35% at the midpoint versus 2024 levels. We anticipate an oil cut of 66%-70%. With the Lucero transaction closed in March, production for the first quarter is expected to range from 14,000-15,000 BOE per day, and cash CapEx for the year is anticipated at $130 million-$150 million, weighted more towards the first half of the year as the larger working interest wells are brought online. This includes the completion of two drilled but uncompleted wells that Brian mentioned earlier and approximately $20 million of expected acquisitions during the year. Remember that production and CapEx can be lumpy during the year, and they were not held to a fixed capital budget, but will always allocate capital to the highest rate of return projects. We are very excited to have Lucero as part of the Vitesse team. The effort put into the closing of the transaction was readily apparent, and we look forward to seeing the value this hard work will produce as we move forward together. With that, let me turn the call over to the operator for Q&A. Thank you. At this time, we'll conduct our question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press Star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate that your line is in the question queue. You can press Star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the Star keys. Our first question comes from Jeff Grampp with Alliance Global Partners. Please state your question. Morning, guys. Was curious, Bob, to get your perspective on the acquisition side of the world or ground game. Obviously, you guys get a nice chunk of cash from Lucero and delever the balance sheet and free up some liquidity amidst some volatile oil markets that I imagine could be lucrative from an acquisition standpoint. Does this maybe lead you guys to perhaps be a bit more aggressive on the ground game or acquisition front given those dynamics, or how might you think about that strategy in the context of kind of the improvements on the balance sheet side? Yeah. Hi, Jeff, and thanks for the question. When we look at the screen every day of the oil price, when we see it starting with a 6, that is very advantageous for us in the acquisition front. Oil in the 60s allows our current asset to perform very well. I will tell you, we have not seen this much deal flow in something that's a little chunkier since we've been public. We will be very methodical. We waited a couple of years for Lucero, but I'm telling you, that's a great question. Oil in the 60s is a sweet spot for us, Jeff. Great. I appreciate those details. Maybe switching from offense to defense, curious to get updated on kind of the dividend philosophy. Obviously, we have the increase with the transaction here, and you guys have some nice hedges for the next couple of years. To the extent you use your balance sheet to maintain that dividend, is that something you guys are comfortable with in kind of the near medium term? Provided leverage is still low, what are the toggles or variables that you guys are kind of looking for that we should look for that might necessitate revisiting the dividend plan if at any point? Thanks. Yeah. No, thanks, Jeff. Look, our product is our dividend, and everything we do is focused on supporting that dividend and growing that dividend. We are risk managers. We do have hedges, but the biggest risk management is how economically we spend our capital. You need to remember, everyone needs to remember, when the price of oil goes down, our drilling and completion costs go down. It is a dynamic process. It is almost impossible to figure out what a "break-even" is. As the price of oil goes down, our CapEx will go down, and that is beneficial to our coverage ratio. In a band of $55-$85 oil, our dividend is solid. All right. That's really helpful. Thank you for the time. Thanks, Jeff. Your next question comes from Bobby Brooks with Northland Capital Markets. Please state your question. Hey, good morning, guys. Thank you for taking my question. I'll kind of piggyback on Jeff's point on the M&A outlook. You guys mentioned in the press release that you are positioned operationally and financially to pursue additional acquisitions, and then the CapEx guide bakes in $20 million of incremental acquisitions. I was curious on, one, what does that $20 million consist of? Second, as you think about your acquisition strategy going forward, is it kind of broadening in terms of the size and maybe region of what you were looking at in the past or since you came public? Yeah. The answer to that, the second question is absolutely. The ability to operate, Jimmy, Brian, and I were operators in the past. The ability to operate gives us acquisition power that we can look at, our lens is broader. We are looking for alpha where we can find it. Look, with the gas strip where it is today, we're looking at gas assets where we hadn't focused on that in the past. We are looking, we've always looked outside the basin. Obviously, the Bakken is our first love, and we still think there's acquisition running room in the Bakken. Brian, you want to comment more on that? Yeah. I'll just kind of touch on the fact that you guys have seen us do quite a few acquisitions over the past few years. We're constantly looking at that ground game. We're looking at opportunities. Bob talked about oil prices being in the 60s. We're seeing lots of deals. We'll continue to evaluate all of these deals. For us, there was a question earlier about whether or not we'd be more aggressive with the cash on our balance sheet. I don't think that we ever really get aggressive. We have a rate of return hierarchy that we talked about earlier. We're going to stick with that. As opportunities present themselves, we will definitely take advantage of those. Certainly, as we think about our guidance and our budgets for the year, we do build in those acquisitions, and they can take many different forms. I mean, we may find something that's more of a PDP-type acquisition. We may find near-term development. We're looking at a variety of things right now, and we're pretty highly confident that we'll get some of those closed during the course of the year. We do not have a CapEx budget. We guide simply because of what our expectations can be. With our capital structure, we will seek highly economic things when we can find them. Jimmy, do you want to add anything? Okay. You guys covered it. Got it. Good. Yeah. No, that was great color. I appreciate it. I just wanted to kind of circle back on the $20 million of that. I know you said you give the CapEx guide just for expectation purposes, but any color that you could give on what the expectation is of that $20 million, is that just more ground game, smaller acquisition stuff, or is it something a bit more, or is it something for maybe a bit more chunky, like you mentioned? Yeah, Bobby, I think that Brian covered it pretty well. That can take many different forms. I think given where we are now, that we want to put a number out there, what our expectations are, get a line of sight to things that are available, but it can take the form of several different styles of acquisitions. We look at everything from chunkier deals that could be the entire $20 million to several smaller deals that total up to that. I hate to put you off a little bit, but it's just a placeholder for things that we think that we can pull down during the year. No, fair enough. That makes sense. You guys are looking at things outside the Bakken, right? I wanted to kind of maybe tie it into Luminis. I'm going to say this wrong, your system, Luminis, and kind of how you can leverage because my understanding is it's really kind of focused on well data within the Bakken, or is it a bit more broad than that? The advantages that you get using that for deals within the Bakken, is that something that you can leverage as you look outside of it? Absolutely. Bobby, it's Luminis, and thanks for mentioning it. We take great pride in that, and it expands every day. We scrape unbelievable amounts of data. We have data for the Haynesville, for the Midcon, for the Permian, certainly for the DJ, and the Powder. It is a very powerful engine. We can analyze a deal that has thousands of wells literally within days. We lean on Luminis a lot, and it is very critical that that becomes a more powerful tool in the future. Fair enough. The last one for me is you guys make it very clear that you'll allocate capital to the highest return assets. Keeping that in mind, does the added Lucero operated acreage kind of bump down some of the non-op inventory? Just trying to get a sense of how the added Lucero acreage changes your perspective on how you want to work through your inventory over the next, call it, two, three years. Yeah. Brian? Yeah. I think that it just gives us an added flexibility, right? We now have an operated asset that competes against our non-op. We've said it many times, we don't have a budget. We'll continue to invest capital where we think it's best rewarded. Having that operated asset, they do have several very strong drilling locations that are now in our inventory that we can access. For 2025, our intention at this point is only to complete the two drilled but uncompleted wells at this point. We're going to continue to evaluate those drilling opportunities. Right now, they're kind of on our budget for 2026, but we'll continue to evaluate it as we get other non-operated opportunities in the door. Fair enough. Thank you guys for taking the questions and congrats on the great year. Thanks, Bobby. Your next question comes from John White with Roth Capital Partners. Please state your question. Good morning and congratulations on closing the deal and your strong 2024 results. Thank you, John. Yeah. Of the Lucero properties, what percentage are operated? Basically, 100% of the assets. They do have some very, very minor non-operated working interests, but the vast majority of their interests are all operated properties. Okay. Reading the operations update, it looks like the Lucero working interest is much higher than Legacy Vitesse acreage. It is, John. Remember that our average working interest in our 7,000 properties is roughly 3%. But when you bring in the 60-65 producing wells that Lucero has an interest in, their average working interest is going to be closer to 75%-80% in those properties. Okay. Did I read that right? You did. All right. Thanks for the answers, and I'll pass it back to the operator. Thank you, John. Thank you. Just a reminder to ask a question, press star one. Our next question comes from Noel Parks with Tuohy Brothers. Please state your question. Hi, good morning. Apologize if you already touched on this, but can you just sort of talk about the status of infrastructure in the basin, the utilization, thinking about gas and both gas and oil takeaway? I guess I do not think so much these days about footprint, but just about what is aging out there and might be in need of attention. Hey, Noel, this is Jimmy. Thanks for the question. Yeah. In general, I'd say the Bakken's in pretty good shape as more mature basin, if you will. I think from an oil takeaway situation, we're in really good shape. We are impacted from different markets or different sources of oil, like coming down from Canada. In general, for takeaway, we don't have issues moving out of the basin. On the gas side, we could always use more gas processing and particularly NGL takeaway capacity. It's a bit of a balancing act right now to recover just enough ethane to fill up the gas pipes and get the NGLs moved on the NGL pipelines. We could always use more on that side. Generally, I'd say we're in pretty good shape for the current level of activity and the rig count in the basin. Great. Thanks. This is just sort of a reality check question. As I was looking through the slides and I saw the pie chart that showed the range of operators, I actually was astonished that it still is not more concentrated as far as the operatorship than it is, that there's still as much fragmentation. Even the largest operators don't seem to have really a dominant share. I guess, is everyone, I think about the private guys, especially just so entrenched with getting the returns, running down their wells, etc., a little bit of drilling, that things are just probably as consolidated as you think they're going to get, or are there maybe some of those long-awaited exits on the horizon, would you say? I'll take the first crack at that. This is Brian and let Bob or Jimmy jump in. There's been quite a bit of consolidation, and we've seen originally the number of operators that we had interest with were ranging up toward 40, and we're down closer to 30 now. That consolidation has happened. Even from just the standpoint of I see the pie chart you're looking at, and that's on an acreage basis. If you look at it from a production basis, we've got about five operators now that make up roughly 75% of our total production. The consolidation has occurred, and it probably will continue to occur. I think there's some other companies out there that over the next few years, they'll find ways to consolidate. It's a smart thing and a good way to do business. Right. Was somebody else going to add something? I think Brian covered it pretty well. Okay. Great. Thanks a lot. Thanks, Noel. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'll hand the floor back to Bob Gerrity for closing remarks. I want to thank everyone for taking their time today, and we look forward to the next call that we have with you. In the interim, if you have any questions, please contact Ben directly. Thank you. Thank you. With that, we conclude today's call. All parties may disconnect. Have a good day.