Good day, and welcome to the Wayfair Q1 2023 earnings release conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star one again. For operator assistance throughout the call, please press star zero. Finally, I would like to advise all participants that this call is being recorded. Thank you. I'd now like to welcome James Lamb to begin the conference. James, over to you. Good morning. Thank you for joining us. Today, we will review our first quarter 2023 results. With me are Niraj Shah, Co-founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Co-chairman, Steve Conine, Co-founder and Co-chairman, and Kate Gulliver, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. We will all be available for Q&A following today's prepared remarks. I would like to remind you that our call today will consist of forward-looking statements, including but not limited to those regarding our future prospects, business strategies, industry trends, and our financial performance, including guidance for the second quarter of 2023. All forward-looking statements made on today's call are based on information available to us as of today's date. We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statements will be accurate, although we believe that we have been reasonable in our expectations and assumptions. Our 10-K for 2022, our 10-Q for this quarter, and our subsequent SEC filings identify certain factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements made today. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any of these statements, whether as a result of any new information, future events, or otherwise. Also, please note that during this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures as we review the company's performance, including Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin, and free cash flow. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered replacements for and should be read together with GAAP results. Please refer to the Investor Relations section of our website to obtain a copy of our earnings release and investor presentation, which contain descriptions of our non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measures. This call is being recorded, and a webcast will be available for replay on our IR website. I would now like to turn the call over to Niraj. Thank you, James, and good morning, everyone. We're pleased to reconnect with you today to share the details of our first quarter results. Last August, we shared a roadmap laying out our path to profitability. The first step was getting back to Adjusted EBITDA breakeven. Through a focus on our three core initiatives of driving customer and supplier loyalty, nailing the basics, and cost efficiency, we've made significant strides in improving our offering and customer experience while simultaneously reducing our cost structure. Collectively, these efforts have resulted in increasing market share and a significant reduction in operating expenses versus last quarter, getting us to nearly Adjusted EBITDA breakeven in Q1. We're excited to share that we expect to have positive Adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter. We've always known, and now we are clearly demonstrating, that the Wayfair model is inherently profitable and that there is considerable opportunity in front of us to rapidly drive further margin expansion while investing for future growth. We've reached this profitability milestone in spite of the difficult macro environment our business has operated in for the better part of a year. Our category, in particular, has been impacted more than others, with sales first turning down in March of 2022 and now contracting approximately 20% year-over-year, according to many of the sources we follow. While traffic remains challenged, our conversion levels have held steady, and our work on nailing the basics and driving customer and supplier loyalty is leading to sustained market share growth. In the second quarter, we're seeing improving year-over-year order trends, and we're just coming off the back of our 7th Way Day event. At the beginning of the year, as we planned a denser promotional calendar for 2023, we decided to try a three-day format for Way Day. We are very pleased by the engagement from both our suppliers and our shoppers to the extra day. It's a testament to the hard work and the quality of execution of the team that our model of fast delivery, great availability, and sharp pricing is firing on all cylinders, even as we are making meaningful adjustments to our cost base. As we've done for several quarters, I want to update you on different parts of the business in the lens of our three key initiatives, starting with cost efficiency. As part of our $1.4 billion total annualized, $500 million coming from operational cost savings. These cost savings initiatives are multifold and manifest across all aspects of our value chain. As we're now starting to see These savings flow through in our gross margin. I wanted to take a few moments to share some further examples of these initiatives and provide you some more perspective on our progress. As we started down the road of driving cost efficiency, our overarching goal was to actually enhance the customer and supplier experience even as we looked for areas of savings. One of the ways we do that is by reducing damage rates, both on specific products as well as in the aggregate. In instances where we see rising incident rates, we take a proactive stance in working with our suppliers level, using information on damage rates to compose better search results for shoppers. This is one of many factors that has driven our overall incidence rate down by over 15% since last summer. By prioritizing items that we know consistently delight our shoppers, we create a better experience, save on after-order service expenses, and drive a much higher likelihood of generating a repeat order in the future. Lower cost of delivery directly translates to lower retail prices for consumers. Another area that we focused on recently is optimization of our last mile costs. Every product sold on Wayfair is classified as either a small or large parcel. Though to set expectations, our small parcels average 30 pounds and can actually go as high as 150 pounds in some cases. Our small parcel orders are shipped through carriers like FedEx, and as you would expect, are less expensive to deliver than large parcel items, most of which are fulfilled through our middle and last mile Wayfair delivery network, where all trucks are staffed with two-person teams rather than just a single driver due to the heavy and bulky nature of the products. Many items will straddle the line between small or large. We've sharpened our data analytics tools that decide whether a product is classified as a large parcel or not. For some items, large parcel clearly makes sense. The higher cost of delivery is more than offset by the reduced damage rates from the extra care. In other cases, we may see that shipping times and damage rates are indifferent, in which case classifying the item as a small parcel creates a more compelling retail price while preserving the customer experience. Our ability to optimize shipping costs has been further enhanced by our efforts to drive more suppliers through CastleGate with multiple benefits that accrue to the customer and to Wayfair. Improved forward positioning means fewer logistical touch points and therefore less fulfillment expense, while also resulting in a lower risk of damage and faster delivery times. In fact, the percentage of items on the site with speed badging hit a new record high in the first quarter of this year. These are just two examples across a multifaceted initiative with more than 70 distinct areas of savings, all of which it adds up to the more than $500 million I mentioned earlier. In a few minutes, Kate will talk more specifically about the financial flow through here, I want to acknowledge the speed and thoroughness with which our team has executed on these work streams. Since we started this process last summer, we've now achieved more than half of the targeted savings on an annualized basis and are making steady progress towards completing the remainder by year-end. These are durable, process-oriented savings that we expect will create improved economics and efficiency on every single order placed and which we believe will lead to higher savings when the volume growth returns. I mentioned it earlier, it bears repeating. We're extremely proud that even as we have driven these considerable changes across our business, we are still seeing strong market share expansion. Our second key initiative is driving customer and supplier loyalty every day. The best evidence of our progress here comes from the market share picture. We collect market share data from several sources, such as conversations with our suppliers, third-party research, and credit card data. The picture we are seeing across all sources has unified over the past several quarters a clear and resounding win in share for Wayfair. YipitData, one of the major credit card data providers, recently published their publicly available first quarter home goods market share index for the United States, which shows us in the number one position with ongoing share capture for several quarters. A similar story is playing out in our second largest market, Canada, where we have seen robust share capture since last summer as we made big unlocks to speak more specifically to our shoppers in the region. Across our efforts to drive customer loyalty, we recently launched filters to search for products fulfilled from Canada, which our customers in the region love, and are highlighting items that are positioned within the country. Our Canadian customers appreciate the added benefit of surfacing items with faster delivery speeds, competitive retail prices, and lower incidence rates. We've also launched a best-in-class French experience for our wayfair.ca shoppers and host Canada-specific promotional events like Victoria Day and Canada Day sales to speak more directly to our customers in the country. During these moments, we have partnered with Canadian influencers and celebrities to further connect with our shoppers and offer them items they will love. As with the U.S., our core recipe in Canada has never been in a better place. Strong availability, competitive pricing, and fast delivery have kept customers coming back. This ties nicely to the third of our key initiatives, nailing the basics. In that spirit, we recently enabled detailed end-to-end international tracking on Canadian orders that originate from the United States. While shoppers previously could only see the detailed location of their northbound order once it had crossed the border, our Canadian customers now have full visibility to where their items are at each stage of fulfillment, which reduces the volume of post-order service inquiries. On the theme of service, we've also strengthened our Canada-based customer service team. We find that having domestic agents who understand the unique needs of their local shopper reduces the number of follow-ups and immediately improves the customer experience. The true meaning of nailing the basics. I wrap up, I want to zoom back out for a moment. For several quarters now, we've laid out a roadmap for our return to profitability. Along the way, we told you that we intend to be both thoughtful and expeditious as we chart out this journey. While we still have more road ahead of us, we see our progress over the past nine months as a true proof point that the plan is working. We're as confident as we've ever been that Wayfair will emerge stronger for it on the other side. Now, with that, let me hand it over to Kate to walk through our financials for the quarter. Thanks, Niraj. Good morning, everyone. I want to echo Niraj's enthusiasm at the promising signs we are seeing for 2023. Our team has been working hard to execute the plan we outlined in 2022. We couldn't be more pleased to see the output now beginning to manifest in the results. Let's dive into the first quarter figures. Net revenue for the quarter came in at $2.8 billion, down 7.3% year-over-year. We are seeing a return to more traditional seasonality in our business and are encouraged by the improving trends we see in order growth. As we shared before, we expected order volume and active customer count to pick up as inflationary prices abated, and we are starting to see evidence of this dynamic playing out. The picture between our geographic segments remains largely unchanged, with net revenue in our U.S. segment down 5% year-over-year and our international segment down 14.4%, excluding the impact of FX. I'll now move further down the P&L. As I do, please note that the remaining financials include depreciation and amortization, but exclude equity-based compensation, related taxes, and other adjustments. I will use the same basis when discussing our outlook as well. Gross margin had another stellar quarter, coming in at 29.7%, even as we maintained a robust promotional calendar. Our team continues to make meaningful headway on our operational cost savings, as Niraj discussed, and you are beginning to see that flow through to this line. Niraj described these savings as process-oriented, meaning they will hold and in some cases improve as our volume increases. He noted that we've achieved over half of our targeted annualized savings. Some of which you're starting to see show up in gross margin, while the rest we have passed on to price. It's important to note that we see these savings as structural margin expansion on the roadmap to our longer term target gross margins in the mid-thirties range. Last quarter, I mentioned that as we see these savings begin to accrue, we may choose to reinvest some of them in the customer experience through sharper pricing. The mix will be dictated by the macro environment we see over the duration of the year. I think one important point to make here is that our operative goal is to maximize the gross profit dollars generated across a multi-quarter horizon. We can do this in two ways. The first is passing the savings directly on to incremental growth profit, driving a higher gross margin. The second is to sharpen our pricing, letting the operational savings offset the impact from a reduced take rate, effectively netting out to a gross margin that remains unchanged, but one that results in more orders and more repeat business. We will balance this dynamic to keep driving optimal outcomes over time. Our plans are to reinvest some portion of further savings and price in order to drive more volume and maintain and grow our share position while also balancing gross margin expansion. Moving on to customer service and merchant fees. We saw this line come in at 4.7% of net revenue in the first quarter. Advertising was 11.8% of net revenue, as we are driving even better efficiency out of our paid channels, while we continue to face the same headwinds on the volume of free and direct traffic that we've seen for several quarters now due to the macro environment. Finally, our Selling, Operations, Technology, General and Administrative expenses totaled $484 million. As a reminder, the majority of this expense line is related to our people, and the remainder covers software and other G&A. You are seeing the majority of the savings from the January reduction in force reflected in this figure, and you should expect to see this number show further moderation in Q2 as we fully run rate the cash compensation piece of the $750 million of annualized labor savings that we have now completed. We don't see this as the end of our cost savings journey on SOT G&A, and we plan to drive low single digit sequential compression each quarter through year end on top of what we've already accomplished. All combined, the outperformance on gross margin and advertising, as well as strength in the top line, contributed to a significant improvement in Adjusted EBITDA at -$14 million this quarter or nearly breakeven. A substantial improvement compared to the -$71 million in Q4 2022 and -$113 million in Q1 2022. Our U.S. business saw a second consecutive quarter of positive Adjusted EBITDA at $29 million, and we nearly halved the international Adjusted EBITDA losses compared to Q4. We are excited to see the tangible benefits of our cost savings work materialize, and we remain tightly unified around our future profitability goals. We ended the quarter with just over $1 billion of cash and highly liquid investments on our balance sheet and over $1.6 billion of total liquidity when including our revolving credit facility capacity. Net cash from operations was a negative $147 million, and capital expenditures were $87 million, resulting in free cash flow of negative $234 million. As a reminder, the first quarter is almost always a seasonal cash outflow quarter for our business, given the negative cash conversion cycle of our working capital following Q4 holiday peak. Let's turn to guidance for the second quarter. Quarter to date, gross revenue has been trending in the negative high single digits year-over-year, and we expect improvement due to the easier compares in May and June. We've also spoken recently to you about sequential trends and seasonality, and this trend would imply Q1 to Q2 sequential growth of just below positive 10% for net revenue. Despite the highly uncertain macro environment and the reduction in AOV due to deflation, we are excited by the ongoing improving trends in order volume and are seeing promising signs in the business. On gross margin, we would guide you to the 29%-30% range that I framed earlier. We continue to expect customer service and merchant fees to be between 4%-5% of net revenue and advertising to be between 12% and 13% for Q2. We forecast SG&A or OpEx, excluding equity-based compensation and related taxes, to come in between $460 million and $470 million, showing some further improvement from Q one levels as we fully run rate the savings from earlier in the year. Finally, as we've said several times already, if you follow the guidance I've just outlined, you should see positive Adjusted EBITDA margins in the 0.5%-1.5% range for the second quarter. Based on that range on Adjusted EBITDA and the working capital dynamics as we move into the spring, you should see a sizable sequential improvement in free cash flow for Q two relative to Q one. We are now reaching the first stage along our profitability path that we set out last August. I want to touch on how we are thinking about the next stage, reaching mid-single digit Adjusted EBITDA margins and positive free cash flow. Let me provide an illustrative model to frame the full pro forma impact of the cost savings that you're seeing starting to flow through. To be clear, this isn't meant to be official guidance, but a framework to think about our cost initiatives holistically. For simplicity, let's use our revenue level from 2022, roughly $12 and a quarter billion top line, and apply the pro forma annualized impact of our cost savings initiatives that are already well underway and will be fully enacted by the end of 2023. At that level, we would expect to see Adjusted EBITDA margins in the low to mid-single digit range as gross margins exceed 30% and SG&A reaches between 14%-15% of net revenue due to the ongoing savings work I mentioned above. At that point, we have a cost model that is geared for significant leverage when revenue grows in the future, and we expect that many of our operational efforts will enable the next set of improvements on our roadmap. As we've said several times in the past, once we hit a mid-single digit Adjusted EBITDA margin range, we intend to treat that as a philosophical floor on profitability for the business from which we will then balance any growth in investment spending with a desire to also continually increase profitability. Now let me translate that into cash flow. As many of you know, there are two major bridging items between Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow for our business, working capital and capital expenditures. Our business operates on a negative cash conversion cycle, working capital is a source of cash when revenue grows sequentially and vice versa. The impact of working capital will be entirely a function of your assumptions on revenue. If you assume capital expenditures at ±$90 million per quarter, then the $12 and a quarter billion dollar run rate would also translate to positive free cash flow as well, absent the working capital dynamics. Let me touch on a few housekeeping items for the second quarter. Please assume the following: equity-based compensation and related taxes of roughly $170 million-$200 million. This will be above trend in Q two as a function of the seasonality of our compensation cycle. As a reminder, equity-based compensation is expensed at the share price as of the day the grants are originally approved. As a result, a portion of this is related to historical grants that remain in the PNL at elevated share prices given the share price volatility we have experienced. The remainder will hit the PNL depending on the trajectory of the share price going forward on the dates new grants are approved. Depreciation and amortization of approximately $102 million-$107 million. Net interest expense of approximately $5 million-$6 million. Weighted average shares outstanding equal to approximately 112 million, and CapEx in a $90 million-$100 million range. Before I wrap up, I want to take this opportunity to commend our entire team. Over the last nine months, we've delivered tremendous cost efficiency while at the same time bringing our offering to the strongest place it has been in years. We are excited about the improvements we are seeing in profitability and optimistic that the success of our core recipe will continue to drive our share gains deeper into 2023. Thank you. With that, Niraj, Steve, and I will take your questions. At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, please press star, then the one on your telephone keypad. We request that you keep it to one question and one follow-up. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes line of Alexandra Steiger from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Thank you for taking my questions. I do want to double-click on the comments around your Q2 revenue growth. How do you think about the key drivers here? What create upside versus downside in the trajectory for Q2, including the contribution from an extra day for Way Day? Or put differently, could you maybe walk us through the assumption around customer growth, AOV growth, that went into your guide? Thank you so much. Hi, Alexandra. Thanks for your question. I guess the way to think about it is, in general, the first half of this year, the promotional calendar, we've picked a more dense one. We did that in the back half of last year. That's in response to kind of the consumer environment and sort of what consumers are reacting to. When we planned that out at the beginning of this year, one of the things we did is we tried different formats. Last year, we ran two Way Day events. Other times, we've run eight day, six day, five day, three day. We've run different sale lengths. This year we decided to try that sort of Way Day format of the two days and then the surprise extension. You know, we were happy with how that went. That's just one of kind of the many things we've done on the promotional calendar side in response to the macro. In terms of the Q2 revenue guide, I mean, we're guiding revenue based on what we're seeing happen, and a lot of that has to do with also underlying drivers in the business. You know, because it's, you have the revenue level, but you have kind of what's happening. You mentioned that kind of order count and customer count. What we've been seeing, and you kind of see in our active customer numbers, is sequentially we're seeing the sequential pattern hold, and sequentially we're seeing strength in the business in the core drivers. For example, if you look at order growth, you know, if you look at our largest brand, wayfair.com, it has positive quarter to date in Q2, year-over-year order growth. There's a lot of different metrics that sort of we're able to see that have led to the, you know, effects that the guides we've given. Very helpful. Thank you. Yep. Hey, Chris, thanks for your question. Let me throw out a couple thoughts, and maybe Kate can chime in with some more thoughts of her, hers as well. I think the biggest thing to keep in mind when you talk about returning seasonality to normal, kind of we didn't see revenue kind of normalize after sort of the wonky COVID years until the middle of last year. Once you get to the middle of this year, if you go through the second half of this year, you now, when you think about year-over-year revenue, you have a kind of a base from a year ago that's normal, and you have then what's happening now. As I mentioned, you know, quarter to date, for example, on wayfair.com, orders are up year-over-year. While that's not the entire enterprise, and that's just one metric, it sort of gives you a feel of what's happening as we're getting to more of those normalized comps. I think honestly, it's the key is that our recipe is working. You know, what is that? That's availability, speed of delivery, great value. We're continuing to make a lot of improvements in the customer experience. We're seeing good traction and customer reaction to that. We're then, I think, doing a good job from a kind of what are we offering a customer in terms of, I mentioned the promotional events, and how are we sort of responding to what the macro climate is and working with our suppliers to create that excitement. I think from a technical point, you need the normal year-ago period in order to have the revenue kind of play out, where the, you know, sort of if the business is growing, you see growth, and if it's not growing, you don't see growth. You kind of need last year to be normal too. Yeah. I guess, what I'd add to that. I think Niraj touched on some of the seasonality pieces. We're also obviously seeing, you know, ongoing sustained market share gains. I think that really speaks to the strength of the core offering. To your point, Chris, the, you know, macro environment remains somewhat uncertain. We feel very good about our ability to continue to capture share in that market. The strength of the core offering is evidenced by things like order volume and wayfair.com U.S., you know, turning positive quarter- to- date. Yep. On the pricing front, can you talk about how you think about your strategy overall now. Is it different from what it used to be, i.e., you have these, you know, very fulsome savings on the cost of goods line. I think you used to try to price to market and not necessarily lead the market on price. How are you thinking about your pricing strategy relative to the overall market level now? Yeah, Chris, I don't know that our pricing philosophy is super different than what it's been for a long time, but just to be clear on what it is. We measure effectively the customer's reaction to our price levels, so the price elasticity by different types of goods, different tranches of price. That is a factor in deciding what margin levels we use in different areas of the catalog. One of the inputs to that is understanding competitively where the field is in terms of competitors at price, because obviously that affects the price elasticity kind of dynamic as well. When goods get to be more heavily branded, the elasticity tends to, you know, reflect the need to be very tight to market on price. As goods get to be less branded and increasingly also exclusive, then there's a factor of kind of you need to offer the customer price value, but there's a wider band of how you can price. We try to do that quite scientifically. Then the underlying thing we've been doing, which you cited, is we've been focusing on taking out as much cost as possible so that we can have the margin we want at retail prices we like. That's what we've been doing. A lot of our ability, you know, you've seen the gross margin has held. The gross margin kind of, the way we've been able to improve the gross margin are all structural savings. So they're not things that are fleeting at all. We feel like we can continue to actually unlock value in terms of savings. We can choose, do we pass those to the customer and get sharper on price, or do we put some of it into our margin? There's a balance of what we'll do. Our philosophy hasn't changed, but we're in a much stronger position than we would've been, you know, when, you know, inventory availability was poor or frankly, even before we did some of the things that we've done that have advantaged us. I think the thing that I'd add to that, Chris, is, you know, as Niraj mentioned, we're really seeing nicely in Q1 the benefit of those operational cost savings that we laid out in January. That continues to be a lever for us that we can pull throughout the rest of the year as we balance both maintaining and ensuring, you know, ongoing price competitiveness in this market, also flowing some of that through to the gross margin line. As we said on the call, we're very focused on generating gross profit dollars over a multi-quarter period. I think you'll see, you know, some of that balance play out through the rest of the year. Got it. Thank you very much. Your next question comes to the line of Brian Nagel of Oppenheimer & Co. Your line is open. Hi, good morning. Congrats on the progress here. Nice work. Thanks, Brian. Thank you. A couple questions. First off, you know, Kate, you discussed in your comments just, you know, the nearer term, you know, kind of capital needs here. Recognizing you haven't necessarily given longer term guidance, but, you know, as we're looking at the business model and, you know, the business model continue to evolve here, I mean, how should we think about kind of that longer term, you know, capital needs of the business? Thanks, Brian, for the question. I want to frame up how we think about CapEx and the components of it. There's 3 key components to CapEx. One is that line item that you see, that site and software development cost. That's capitalized technology labor, so our tech team. You should see that line continue to moderate a bit based on the, you know, reduction in force that you've seen and the ongoing efficiency in our labor force. I think you saw that show up a bit this quarter. That's about 60% of the total CapEx expenditure in the quarter. The remainder, the PP&E is really related to two things. One, ongoing investments in our logistics infrastructure. That's really designed to provide increased efficiency out of that network. Two, the build-out of our physical retail network. In this year, that's a Wayfair store that will open in the spring of 2024, as well as two specialty retail brands that will open this year. The sort of mix of those is roughly equal for the remainder of the CapEx. You obviously saw that line moderate a bit in the first quarter, and we remain, you know, as we do with every line item here, we're very focused on driving efficiency there and, continuing to run that as tightly as possible. Okay. No, that's, that's very helpful. My second question, and unrelated, but, you know, you talked about, just the, you know, the, I would say improving consumer metrics here that we're seeing early in 2023. There's obviously a lot going on with Wayfair and a lot of initiatives. As you step back, I mean, how much of what you're seeing right now in terms of improved consumer interaction do you think is a function of specific efforts on the part of Wayfair versus maybe some easing on external pressures in this space? Well, you know, let me answer that a couple different ways. We're clearly taking market share, so I think the outcome is relative to competitors. We're clearly doing meaningfully better because, you know, that's kind of like, I guess, the definition of the market share. As to the why are we doing better than competitors, I think it's less about what the competitors are doing, and it's more about what we're doing. When we mention that recipe, again, you know, great availability, fast, coupling that with all the things we're known for around customer service and emotive shopping experience and product discovery and being tailored for home and, you know, kind of a proprietary delivery advantage on heavy, bulky items. Quickly it turned into a tough stretch when availability got tough. There's a lot of inflation, supply chain kind of short. Drove shortages of goods. Our platform model didn't have the advantage that it has in normal times where you could argue whether we're in a recession time now because there's an overstock of goods or whether we're in, you know, kind of more of a normal time because consumers do have money. You know, that could be semantics because clearly the goods, the home goods market is not kind of on fire, right? It's down year-over-year, and it's tough. We have a great value proposition. Then as the market gets healthier, we're set up for that to be a big tailwind because of kind of how we operate. I do think it's due to our actions. Yeah. I appreciate it. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Ygal Arounian from Citigroup. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. I want to dig into the gross margins a little bit. Nice to see the outperformance. I just wanna maybe get a better picture of just kind of organic improvements around pricing or normalization within that. If increased CastleGate adoption is driving some improvements there as well. Great. Well, you know, thanks for the question, Ygal. Let me start the answer, and then maybe Kate can also jump in on thoughts she wants to add. Let me start by describing sort of the gross margin evolution over time, because if you go back four or five years, we had a gross margin that was more like a 24% type number. Back then, what we were describing to folks is that we had. Originally we described three pillars, and then we updated to describe four pillars that was a runway of over 1,000 basis points. What those four pillars were, one was what we were doing in logistics, which was building out our own proprietary logistics, you know, which today comprises of both the inbound ocean freight, leg through CastleGate Forwarding, the CastleGate Fulfillment operations, which is our warehousing capability and fulfillment capability, and then what we're doing on last mile transportation, whether that be with partners through sortation and induction or whether that be ourselves on the heavy, bulky items. That could take out a lot of cost because excess miles both slows down deliveries, increases damage, but frankly drives up cost. It's a very item faster, but you take out cost. The second of the four pillars was what we were doing around our house brands, which were basically our private label brands. We were creating curation, creating better merchandising experiences, and also increasingly doing that with items that are exclusive or semi-exclusive to us. That allowed us back to the question about how do we price and price elasticity. That allows us to have a wider band in deciding how we price and drives up conversion as well. The third was just around how as we concentrate volume with suppliers, and as their volume goes up, they can actually lower the price of the goods they sell while driving up their profit dollars. It's a win-win for them and for us and for the customer because in that sense, we can basically choose to keep some gross margin or pass it on, and that creates a very good dynamic. The last, which is the pillar we added, was around supplier services. This was as we started to offer services to suppliers outside of just us, buying it wholesale and selling it retail and selling their item, and outside of what we're doing on CastleGate on the logistics offerings, the most notable one of which is, our advertising offering, where suppliers can advertise on our platforms, to kind of drive their outcomes. That's an ancillary high margin revenue stream for us, which is still, frankly, still in its early days. It's growing nicely, but it's still early. Those four topic areas, we each said had hundreds of basis points in them each, and over time, we were gonna unlock them and then choose what of that we put into our gross margin, what of that we passed on to the consumer, which would allow us, obviously, to drive long-term profits because the lower prices drives more conversion, drives future orders, repeats orders, dollars per customer per year, et cetera. What we've been doing is unlocking that roadmap. What I mentioned earlier is you have a couple year disruption in here in 2021, 2022 due to how COVID played out. The roadmap we have from before that is still the roadmap we have now. We're back along it and moving along it aggressively. That is creating a lot of benefit. Specifically now to zoom in, you know, on the kind of, you know, over $1.4 billion of cost actions or specifically over $500 million of operational cost savings, which is part of that roadmap and how that plays out. What that is that is a reflection of us both being aggressive on the long-term roadmap we've had, and specifically also addressing a lot of inefficiencies that had crept in, a lot of which during the COVID period, which again, had thrown us for a loop. We're sort of well past now in terms of executing tightly, and we're unlocking those savings, and you're seeing those manifest, you know, in the way that we describe, where we choose what we put into our margin versus what we do on the retail price. Again, unlocking them in a structural way so we can keep so they just build on each other versus kind of ebb and flow. That's kinda how we think about and kinda how it's playing out. Kate, do you wanna add anything to... Yeah. I think Niraj hit on it nicely, in terms of the broad picture and specific to the quarter, you know, to your question on CastleGate. What I would add there is that the cost savings that we're talking about in the operational network go across our entire logistics infrastructure. That would, of course, you know, include the CastleGate piece of that logistics infrastructure, and we're very pleased with how that's manifesting. The other point that I make on growth margin while we're talking about it is, and that I think is a little bit unique to Wayfair, is that we're able to improve this growth margin during what has been a highly promotional period for the customer. I think that shows the strength of our model and our ability to, you know, pass on that value to the customer, support, frankly, our suppliers who wanna pass on that value to the customer, but do that well, actually raising growth margin throughout 2022. Obviously, you know, significant growth margin improvement this quarter, and we expect that to sustain and grow from here. Great. This was really helpful answer. Then, I wanna follow up on the capital allocation question a little bit more, and maybe dial into, Kate, you mentioned the physical store opportunity investment there. Just trying to understand, you know, A, on that front, what the kind of ultimate goal is when... what level of physical infrastructure is the right level that, you know, helps kind of build off of the online business. Then maybe second on international, as margins there continue. Certainly an improvement quarter-over-quarter, nice improvement, but continuing to be well below the North American business. So just, you know, how you think about the international business and the investment needed there. Thank you so much. Sure, Ygal. Why don't I start on the CapEx question, then, you know, Niraj can certainly chime in. On the physical retail piece, just to level set on where we are today, we have two specialty retail or three specialty retail stores open. The first, those are small format, you know, sort of testing and helping us learn the model of physical retail. The first large format Wayfair stores we've mentioned will open in the spring of 2024, we're opening two additional specialty retail stores this year. As with all new initiatives, we are really in a test and iterate phase. We wanna be prudent and thoughtful about how we roll this out, learn from these first few stores, then, you know, determine further expansion based on that. I think what you're seeing now is really us, you know, testing the model and, you know, starting to put a, you know, a few players on the board there. I think Niraj probably can jump in on physical retail, then I'm happy to go back to your second question on the international margin trajectory. Kate, I think I was going to touch on it slightly differently, which is also just to kind of zoom in on the beginning of what you said, which are capital allocation questions. By that, one way I think to answer your question is to think about this. The $1.4 billion cost actions, that plan that we outlined, was a plan that we think gets us back to being very focused, prioritizing the right actions, being very aggressive with that, making sure the recipe is intact. What it didn't do was we didn't try to say, "Hey, how do you cut the cost structure to really optimize the business to maximize profitability today?" What we left in is a very significant amount of expense on things that do not drive productive economic return today, but we think could be meaningful in the future. You know, international, for example, is losing money as a segment, but we actually believe that we have real potential there. We have a household brand in two of the international markets we're in. We have, you know, input metrics we like in those markets. We have a more challenging macro in some of those. Physical retail, Kate mentioned super early. There's a lot of reason, a lot of external proof around how omni-channel drives value, but we're in the early days. We're gonna, you know, right now, for example, we have a lot of CapEx going to open the first Wayfair large format store. Obviously, that store today produces 0 revenue. It's not open yet, right? That's an expense that we have. There's areas of the business where we're aggressively investing for the future, and we think that that's wise, but we think we can actually be meaningfully profitable while doing that. That's kind of the way we balance. We're gonna be careful not to have too many places that we're investing, because each one needs appropriate amount of focus and prioritization in order to really have a shot at succeeding and breaking through. We're also, we also are keeping that board of strategic initiatives that could be meaningful, you know, kind of there and investing in them in a healthy way so that they're, they actually are set up to flourish. That's kind of the way I think about it. Yeah. The overall goal is invest and be profitable, right? We want to be driving profitable growth and, you know, you'll see that sort of first marker on that in the Adjusted EBITDA positive in Q2. On international margins specifically this quarter, obviously what you've seen there is significant reduction in the losses. You know, we just about half the losses there. As we said on the last call, the cost takeouts that we've done has been across the board. We are focused on driving the profitability everywhere that we operate. And as Niraj mentioned, you know, we're pleased with some of the efforts that we see there. We spoke about Canada on the call and the market share gains in Canada and our prominence there. The last thing that I would add on those margins, just to keep in mind, we've spoken about this before, but we do have overhead allocation that goes both to the U.S. and to our international business. As we reduce our overhead costs, which we've been obviously working very hard on, you'll see some of that benefit flow through the international EBITDA margins as well. Great. Thanks so much. Next question comes from the line of Oliver Wintermantel from Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Yeah, thanks. If I look at the orders delivered, they're back to pre-pandemic levels, you know, using 1Q 2020 as that. The, the order value is still bigger. There's probably some, still some inflation in there. If you look at that, orders delivered number, is that now a good way to look at the business that the, you know, back to pre-pandemic levels, and then on the order value, how much of that was inflation? Thank you. Yeah. Oli, I'm trying to think what would be helpful to you. I mean, I guess the way to think about it is on the inflation front, there's significant inflation. That inflation is well on its way of coming back out. One of the things we have mentioned is that starting a year ago, basically last summer is really when the recipe got back intact. It started with availability getting better in the spring of last year. As you went through the summer, speed got better, by late summer, price had gotten better. What was really happening there is a lot of that was suppliers recognizing that shipping costs had, in particular ocean freight, had abated and starting to price goods reflecting what their replacement cost of those items would be. That's gonna take a long, 'cause there's a lot of excess inventory they're working their way through, and they don't necessarily price it all to the future price right away. That deflation is coming through. There will be some deflation. The thing I will point out though is, this has been a question that we've gotten on prior calls as well, well, won't then the AOV decline be a drag on revenue? One of the things we've pointed out is that what we've seen historically is actually that that is an accelerant on conversion, effectively on order count and customer count. When you're creating the revenue outlook, you gotta take, you know, kind of customer/orders, multiply that by AOV, right, to get revenue. It's... While it's not, kind of the easiest math to kind of think through, there's a very direct correlation there, and that's what we're seeing play out. We mentioned, you know, orders, for example, on wayfair.com are, you know, up quarter- to- date. You know, I think some of what's made comps hard is that, you know, again, last year, first half had wonky comps as those ease, you know, which they're easing here. You get to the normal period back half of last year, you know, that plays through. I think these are the different moving parts. Yeah. I would just reiterate, you know, to your question, we should see order volume improvement, right? As the AOV, as you pointed out, which is still inflated, as that starts to moderate, we should see that order volume grow, and that then translates into customer growth. Those are the right underlying fundamentals, right? We'd rather have order volume and customer growth and AOV growth on at the same period as we can then remarket to those customers, and they become engaged in the platform. That is a trend that we are encouraged by. Got it. Maybe in that regard, on the gross margin side, have you seen any price elasticity there? Like, your gross margins are going up, which is great, but the revenues are still down. Is there a way for you to maybe reinvest more in price and get, you know, the revenues and orders up, or have you not seen the price elasticity when you reduce prices? Well, this is what I tried to address earlier when I was talking about gross margin. That opportunity is definitely there, but that's what we're doing. In other words, we're continuing to unlock cost savings. We're then deciding what we put into price, you know, lowering price, and what we put into our gross margin. There's kind of a pretty heady roadmap there. There's definitely opportunity for us to continue, and the plan is for us to continue to do that as we go through time. Oli, as you know, we have a very, you know, sophisticated pricing model mechanism. This is something that we, you know, constantly are pressure testing. We said we'd achieved about half of those operational cost savings. There's, you know, more to go there. We can make, you know, a real-time decision on how much of that flows through to price, to your point, and generate, you know, future orders and how much of that flows directly through to gross margin. That'll depend a little bit on the market and what we're seeing with our customer. Got it. Thanks very much and good luck. Thanks, Oli. Your next question comes the line of Anna Andreeva from Needham. Your line is open. Great. Thank you so much, and good morning, guys. Good morning. We had quick questions. Hi. One on active customers. You've seen some stability at the enterprise level in the last couple of quarters already. Just curious, what does that number look like for U.S. only? Just any color, what are you seeing in terms of gross adds and churn in the U.S. as some of the promo initiatives are clearly resonating with the consumer? Secondly, I wanted to follow up on advertising. Your sales came in on plan and advertising was below the range you had provided. Could you talk about what you're seeing there with the efficiencies and what is working specifically? You know, on the first question around active customers, I think we've tried to point out that sequentially you're seeing that numbers start to stabilize, we mentioned quarter- to- date, you know, on wayfair.com for example, order count is up quarter- to- date. In terms of the active customer count for the U.S., I'll let Kate comment on that. Yeah, you know. To give that out. We actually, you know, we don't disclose the breakout, but I think you're pointing to a trend that you can see in the revenue breakouts across the U.S. and the international business. And certainly we've already mentioned the order piece in the U.S. That would probably naturally equate to, you know, customer improvements in the U.S. business relative to the international business. I think your second question was on ACNR leverage and how we're looking at that, you know, for the quarter. Yeah. What, Kate, could I jump in on that and then you can maybe add thoughts to it? Yeah, so on advertising, you know, when again, that $1.4 billion, kind of over $1.4 billion set of cost actions that we outlined in January to help folks try to understand everything we've been talking about since last summer, put it into context. We cited advertising on there as one of the items. I think it was the third item on the list. It was in a group of similar things. On advertising, here's, I think it's important to understand how we think about the ad cost, because I think there's sometimes some misconception. I think the easiest way to think about it is think of it as having three buckets of ad cost. The first bucket, which is by far the largest bucket, think of that as kind of evergreen. By evergreen, what I mean is these are different advertising channels that are highly measurable, that are run to very tight paybacks, and that we're looking to increase our spend there, but within that payback constraint that's very tight and very measurable. How can we do that? We can do that with targeting. We can do that with different creative ad units. We can do that by upping the conversion on the traffic. So that we're continuing to maximize. There's a second bucket, which is generally top of funnel type advertising. Television would be kind of the poster child of this, but there's other things in this bucket. Those are channels that we can measure, but the error band around measurement there is larger. You can't measure them quite as precisely as you can measure that first bucket. The measurement methods there more triangulate in on what you believe the value's there. Inside that band, you could spend at the low end of the band or the high end of the band, and it would be within the band that you think is productive for the spend. Again, there's an error band there. There what we've done is we've biased towards being lower in the band rather than being higher in the band, and we're getting good results from that. Let's think of the third bucket as an R&D bucket. These are advertising channels that do not yet operate at the payback we want them to, but we believe they could. We're experimenting in these channels, figuring out what you know, trying to find breakthroughs of what works, what doesn't work. Once you get to a productive approach there, where you're getting the payback you want, you would then scale it, and these channels would then go into either bucket one or bucket two, depending on what kind of advertising channel it is. There what we've done is we've taken a top-down approach of saying, "Hey, what percent of our ad budget or how many dollars are we willing to put into R&D?" We take the... We're now taking that amount and deciding, well, so now which of these opportunities we see do we want to invest in to get breakthroughs? We're kind of doing that top down rather than bottoms up. Bottoms up, you could end up with many different opportunities, with many different ideas of what to test, and it could add up to being a higher percentage of your total ad spend than you would like. It will obviously de-lever your ACNR because it's running at a very high ACNR percentage. It's not at payback yet. By deciding top down, you know, again, there's some channels we're really excited about, what we did is that's still a nice, you know, good amount of money to spend, but it's defined to make sure it doesn't grow to be too high a percent, picked by doing it top down. That has also driven benefit on ACNR. ACNR, we've been able to make more efficient without hurting our ability to strategically use advertising to grow. Remember, this is all with the headwind of the free paid mix, which we talked about on prior calls. Easiest way to think about this is the category's currently out of favor, right? We've talked about the category being down 20% year-over-year. Well, the category, it's a discretionary category, and its interest will ebb and flow with the kind of broader economy. Frankly, it has a bigger ebb and flow when you think about the COVID sort of boom at the very beginning of COVID, and then the kind of boom that followed it and the thing that people had a bust in, which was travel, entertainment, restaurant spend. Both of these boom bust cycles will normalize out. They typically are more correlated to each other around the economy. As it does, that free paid mixture turned into being a tailwind because people are just naturally more interested in the category. The easiest illustrative example is if travel's in a boom cycle and home's not, if you get an email from Booking.com and an email from Wayfair, which one are you more likely to click on, simply put? That's kind of like that free paid mix. That's still a headwind. That's kind of... The ad cost got much more efficient due to what I described about the three buckets, and that's despite the headwind. Okay. Okay, that's really helpful. Appreciate it, guys, and best of luck. Thanks, Anna. Thank you. I think we just have time for one more question. Our last question comes from the line of Curtis Nagle from BofA. Your line is open. Great. Thanks so much. I guess 2 quick ones. Just 1, how to think about, I guess, the inventory flow in the industry, coming through the rest of the year. It seems like that's been a nice tailwind for you guys. Do you think that continues, you know, maybe as surpluses clean up a little bit? Just, you know, any commentary in terms of, I guess the latest thinking on addressing the '25 converts and kinda what's the strategy around that? Thanks. Yeah, great. Let me answer the first part about inventory flow, and then maybe I'll turn it over to Kate to answer the second question about the convert. On the inventory flow, since last spring, suppliers have had excess inventory. That depending on the supplier and how aggressive they were on it and where they started from, some have worked their way through it, some are still working their way through it. Some believe it'll take them into early next year to work their way through it. I'd be cautionary around thinking of that as a temporary sort of tailwind or temporary hope. The way to think about it is actually the way the business model works is it... Our model works very well, whether there's a kind of an appropriate amount of inventory or an excess amount of inventory. What it does is it basically allows the suppliers to lean in and compete against one another to put value in front of the customer. The excess inventory actually is a bit of a challenge right now because it came in at such a high cost basis. Suppliers are not in a great position to necessarily be as aggressive as they would like to be. As it normalizes, they then bring goods in that are at a more normal level. Actually, the wholesale cost, and therefore the retail cost, will continue to decline as it normalizes out, not increase. That's kind of a nuance based on the dynamic of what happened a year ago, but it's an important one to appreciate because as we get farther into this cycle, we believe that our competitive position actually gets advantaged more, not disadvantaged. Just to touch on your question around the capital structure. You know, you're referencing the 2025. To just remind everyone, that's a late 2025 maturity, and we believe we have multiple options at our disposal for how to manage this going forward, and we'll continue to be opportunistic there. I'd point you to our September transaction, which is a liability management transaction. We pushed out some of the 2024 and 2025 maturities as the kind of thing that we might do going forward, and I think that's a good example of how we look at it. Okay. Thank you. Great. With that, thank you everyone for joining. Thank you, everybody. Talk to you next quarter. That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now all disconnect.