Good morning. Welcome to Webster Financial Corporation's fourth quarter 2025 earnings conference call. Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to introduce Webster's Director of Investor Relations, Emlen Harmon to introduce the call. Mr. Harmon, please go ahead. Good morning. Before we begin our remarks, I want to remind you that comments made by management may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are. Subject to the safe harbor rules. Please review the forward-looking disclaimer and safe harbor language in today's press release and presentation for more information about risks and uncertainties which may affect us. The presentation accompanying Management's remarks can be found on the Company's investor relations website at investors.websterbank.com. I'll now turn the call over to Webster Financial CEO John Ciulla. Thanks, Emlen. Good morning and welcome to Webster Financial Corporation's fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings call. We appreciate you joining us this morning. I'm going to start with a quick synopsis of the year. Our President and Chief Operating Officer Luis Massiani is going to provide an update on operating developments and our CFO Neal Holland will provide additional detail on financials before my closing remarks and Q&A. Webster continued to excel from a fundamental perspective in the fourth quarter and we entered 2026 on our front foot. Our strategic efforts in 2025 largely focused on execution and our performance was consistently strong over the course of this year despite an uncertain macro backdrop. At times we held our focus on delivering for our clients and enhancing the operating capabilities of the bank. On a full-year basis, Webster generated a 17% ROTCE and a 1.2% ROA. Our EPS was up 10% over the year prior while we grew loans 8% and deposits 6%. Our tangible book value per share increased 13% over the prior year while accelerating capital distributions to shareholders by repurchasing 10.9 million shares. We produced strong financial results while continuing to invest in our non-traditional banking verticals including HSA Bank, Ametros and InterSync. As we look to fortify and advance the strategic advantages these businesses provide, we also aggressively remediated the 2 isolated pockets of our loan portfolio with less favorable credit characteristics which optimizes our balance sheet and enhances forward profitability. One illustration of this initiative is the 5% decline in commercial classified loans relative to prior year end. The macroeconomic backdrop remains supportive of asset quality performance more generally as we continue to see solid asset quality trends from our portfolio at large. We enter 2026 with robust capital levels and a uniquely strong funding and liquidity profile, diverse asset origination capabilities, consistent credit performance, robust capital generation and a strong risk mitigation framework. These enable the sustainable and steady growth of the company. I'll now turn it over to Luis to review business developments. Thanks John. Our performance in the fourth quarter echoed the solid results that we delivered through the year. Our clients continue to navigate well through the macro environment and client activity remained robust in terms of both loan growth and lending related fee income. Limited payoff activity also contributed to better than expected loan growth in the fourth quarter. Growth was generated across a broad range of asset classes, highlighting the diversity of origination capabilities that is a key strength of our franchise. We saw significant progress on credit remediation as classified commercial loans were down 7% and nonperformers were down 8%. Net charge-offs were 35 basis points. The trajectory of problem assets should continue to decline with some quarters decreasing more than others as was the case in 2020 in 2025 in 2025, following the strong year of deposit growth in which our commercial, consumer, healthcare, financial services and InterSync businesses all contributed to our performance. We see continued opportunity to grow across our diverse funding platforms while still early stages Bronze Plan participants in Affordable Care Act healthcare plans have started opening HSA accounts. We enhanced our existing mobile and web enrollment systems to better serve ACA participants and we are seeing increased account openings in our direct to consumer channel which should accelerate through the rest of the year. Our expectation for deposit growth from HSA eligibility for Bronze and Catastrophic plan participants is unchanged. We believe newly HSA eligible plan participants will drive $1 billion-$2.5 billion in incremental deposit growth at HSA Bank over the next five years, including $50 million-$100 million of growth in 2026. The acceleration and growth will be gradual as newly eligible enrollees in the ACA plans first recognize and then adopt HSA accounts. We're also closely watching healthcare policy developments as there is growing appetite in Washington for a number of potential legislative actions that would enable HSA Bank to help a significantly greater portion of Americans manage their health care saving and spending needs. This includes the potential for unpassed provisions in last year's reconciliation bill to now be passed and proposed legislation that could direct some ACA subsidies directly into consumer HSA accounts. The outlook for deposit growth at Ametros also remains very strong. A greater portion of settlement recipients are recognizing the benefits of professional administration. We are adding sales capacity and leveraging Webster's scale and technology to further enhance the member experience. Turn it over to Neal. Thanks Luis and good morning everyone. I'll start on slide 5 with a review of our balance sheet. Balance sheet growth continued at a solid clip in the fourth quarter with growth in both loans and deposits. Assets were up $880 million or 1% in the fourth quarter. On a full year basis they were up just over $5 billion or 6.4%. We continue to operate from a strong capital position relative to internal and external thresholds. During the fourth quarter we repurchased 3.6 million shares. Loan trends are highlighted on slide 6. In total, loans were up $1.5 billion or 2.8% and on a full year basis were up 7.8%. Growth was diverse and predominantly driven by commercial loan categories including commercial real estate. We provide additional details on deposits on slide 7 where total deposits were up 0.9% over the prior quarter. While we did see a seasonal $1.2 billion decline in public funds, we also saw growth across each of our business lines and backfilled the seasonal public fund outflows with corporate deposits. Deposit costs were down 11 basis points relative to the prior quarter. While deposit pricing remains competitive, we should see some repricing accelerate in the first quarter driven by seasonal factors and recent repricing efforts. Income statement trends are on slide 8. There were a number of adjustments this quarter. The net effect was a loss of $8 million to pre-tax income and $6 million to after-tax income. Excluding these, adjusted PPNR was down $4.9 million relative to the prior quarter with slightly better revenue offset by expenses related to current and future growth. Adjusted net income was slightly higher than the prior quarter on a lower provision and tax rate. Adjusted earnings per share additionally benefited from a lower share count. The adjustments to GAAP earnings are highlighted on the following slide. On slide 10 is detail of net interest income. We saw a modest increase in NII as loan growth remained solid through the quarter and we saw more limited payoffs activity than anticipated into quarter end. Better than expected. Loan yields also helped support the net interest margin which was a couple basis points better than our most recent guidance. Our December and spot NIM were both 3.35 for the quarter and December as illustrated on slide 11. We remain effectively neutral to gradual changes in short term interest rates. On slide 12, linked quarter adjusted fees were up $2.7 million with contributions from increased client activity, direct investment gains and the credit valuation adjustment. Slide 13 reviews non interest expense trends. Increases in expenses quarter-over-quarter were largely related to growth and growth potential with higher incentive accruals. Investments in the expanded opportunity at HSA Bank and investments in technology. Slide 14 details components of our allowance for credit losses which decreased $9 million relative to the prior quarter. The decline was driven by charge-offs of loans previously reserved and improvements in underlying credit trends. Those improving trends are highlighted on the following slide, which shows that non-performing assets were down 8% and commercial classified loans were down 7%. Criticized loans were also down 6%. Charge-offs for the quarter were 35 basis points. Turning to Slide 16, our capital ratios remain above well capitalized levels and in excess of our publicly stated targets. Our tangible book value per share increased to $37.20 from $36.42 in the prior quarter with net income partially offset by shareholder capital return. I'll wrap up my comments on slide 17 with our outlook for full year 2026. We're anticipating loan growth of 5%-7% and deposit growth of 4%-6%. The midpoint of the guide has expected revenue of $3 billion for 2026. On a GAAP basis. We expect net interest income of $2.57 billion-$2.63 billion, which assumes 225 basis points Fed funds cuts in June and September. We expect fees to be $390 million-$410 million and expenses to be $1.46 billion-$1.48 billion, while noting that first quarter of 2026 expenses will likely be a few percentage points higher than adjusted expenses in the fourth quarter, primarily due to seasonal impacts of payroll taxes, annual merit and benefit costs. With that, I'll turn back to John for closing remarks. Thanks, Neal. Our outlook for this year anticipates that we continue to drive growth that enhances our financial performance as we also invest in and grow businesses that advance our strategic advantage in terms of attractive funding characteristics and asset origination capabilities. Further building on Webster's substantial franchise value. We're in a unique period for the. Banking industry with positive momentum coming from macroeconomic and regulatory tailwinds. While we anticipate we will be a beneficiary of these dynamics, we will also ensure we grow while maintaining the resiliency and adaptability of the company. In terms of Webster's Performance 2025, our 90th year. It was a record year for the bank in terms of milestones and financial achievements, and we're positioned to prosper into the future. The efforts of those in our organization the past several years has created a bank with a differentiated business model that organically and sustainably outgrows and out earns the banking industry at large, does so with a focus on risk appropriate returns, and at the same time is investing in the well being of its communities at large. Thank you to our colleagues and clients for their contributions to our success in the fourth quarter and for the full year and what it means for the future of the organization. Thank you for joining us on the call today. Operator. We'll take questions. Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. And if you would like to withdraw your question again, press star one. We also ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow up. For any additional questions, please re queue. And your first question comes from Jared Shaw with Barclays. Please go ahead. Hey everybody. Good morning. Good morning. You know, on the loan growth side or outlook, can you just give an update on how the partnership with Marathon is influencing that and you know, maybe where things stand there now that we've had a couple quarters? Sure. We're live and we're operational. I would say we've not yet seen a material impact on loan growth trajectory in the sponsor business. I think we are having more swings at the plate just given the bigger implied balance sheet. So we remain optimistic that it was a smart strategic move. Jared, you know, we promised people that this quarter we would give you a little indication of what it meant for financials. It's obviously baked in and it's not material. We expect $2 million in positive income resulting from the JV itself, meaning kind of returns. And everything we've quantified is in our loan growth forecast going forward. I think it could be, you know, an upside opportunity for us should we be able to get some more wins in the sponsor business. But we're kind of, I would say, relatively conservative in terms of our view of the impact on both loan growth and our financial performance in 2026. But live operational, we have originated loans for the JV and as I said, we've been more competitive in competitive situations with borrowers. We just haven't seen a real change in the dynamic in the sponsor book as of yet. Okay, thank you. And I guess as a follow up, just looking at the expense trends and some of the investments you called out in systems and taking advantage of the Bronze opportunity. Is most of that marketing and client outreach or is there any system change that you're contemplating to bring on more of those individuals? No, it's mostly marketing, Jared. It's, you know, as we've talked about the opportunity in the past, a large part of what we're doing is that we have to identify who those individuals are, which is very different to how our sales channels have worked historically because this is not an employer business, but direct to consumer business. And so the vast majority of the investment of the technology is done and we feel very good about the capabilities of what we have there. But you are going to continue to see us investing in identifying those individuals and then motivating and educating those individuals to become HSA holders. So that's where the larger investment dollars are going to go in the fourth quarter and continue to, you know, you'll continue to see in 2026. Great, thanks. Thank you. Jared, your next question comes from the line of Mark Fitzgibbon with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Thanks guys. Good morning. Mark, let's suppose, let's suppose the Category IV threshold is lifted meaningfully sometime soon. I know you'll be able to reduce sort of that annual cost number by pick a number, $20 million, $30 million. But I guess I'm curious strategically how that might change your plans for the company. Yeah, it's a great question, Mark, and I wish we could give more specific numbers. I mean, I think you see in our guide of expenses that we're not anticipating the additional incremental $20 million of expense this year because we're able to either potentially avoid some of those expenses or certainly have more time to spread out those expenses into the future. So, it's our anticipation of changes is already impacting our forward look at investment, and we've already pivoted in terms of, you know, not pedal to the metal in terms of getting ready for Category IV because we think it's highly likely that it'll be significantly modified in the future. So, I think that's important, and I think it gives us a lot of flexibility going forward. I think from an overall strategic perspective, it really doesn't change kind of the way we view life in terms of our growth trajectory, our organic path forward. So, I would say it doesn't have much of an impact on the way we strategically look at growing the bank. It's really giving us the opportunity to either increase profitability in the short term or reposition dollars that otherwise would have been invested for Category IV preparedness into revenue generating investments, which is obviously the goal. So I think that's the way I would characterize our view of Category IV. Okay, great. And then separately, Neal, I wonder if you could help us think through the NIM trajectory in the early part of 2026. Yeah. So we ended the quarter and December at a NIM of 335. We expect that exit rate to maintain throughout 2026, and so we should see kind of a 335 for the full year. Now, obviously there's variability there depending on what happens with the curve and other items, but we think 335 is a good midpoint guide for next year. There will be the normal seasonal factors. You know, we'll tick up a few basis points, likely in Q1, and then that will come down a little bit in Q2 and tick back up in Q3. But I would be thinking in that mid-330s range for our go forward NIM expectations for 2026. Thank you. Thank you, Mark. Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Breese with Stephens. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. Morning, John. At a recent event, you noted that you and the Webster team can be. A bit more aggressive on deposit pricing. Something you could provide just a bit more color there. How much more room do you see to lower deposit costs absent rate cuts this year? And if you have it, what was the period end cost of deposits? Yeah, I'll let Neal give you the numbers as usual. But I think we did. We were a little bit more aggressive in the fourth quarter. There is still significant competition, particularly in our geographic footprint. And so I think we're kind of taking a very kind of thoughtful and deliberate approach. And I'll let Neal kind of talk to you about what transpired in the quarter and how we're looking at pricing going forward. Yeah. For those of you who listened to our last public comments, we guided down NIM for the fourth quarter by a few basis points. And when we had the mid-December cut, we made more aggressive moves than some of our last cuts. And so we had nice pricing down and we ended December with an average cost of deposits at 1.91 versus 1.99 for the quarter. So a nice trajectory down there. As John said, competition remains strong, but we did have some positive movement, especially on that last cut in our continuing to look for ways to optimize our overall cost of deposits, carrying that into kind of beta assumptions. We're assuming for kind of this cycle through the end of next year, a 30% overall beta, which is a little bit higher than we are today, but that's how we're looking at deposit pricing within our guide. Great. And then just thinking about loan growth. As it relates to reserve. You know, maybe first, what... Are current spreads on Commercial Real Estate and C&I? Do you expect to grow in some of these lower risk sectors in 2026, resulting in further reductions in the reserve as a percentage of loans? Yeah, that's another interesting question. You know, credit spreads have tightened significantly. I was talking with our chief credit risk officer yesterday, and, you know, we've seen 30-50 basis points over the last 18 months or so, compression in spreads, particularly in kind of commercial real estate assets, you know, that have gone kind of stabilized down to 180 basis points to 200 basis points over reference rates. So, you know, I do think you're seeing in our portfolio and what you saw in our provisioning this quarter, Neal mentioned the fact that we resolved some problem assets and that sort of, you know, continues to release. But you're right in that what we've been adding in terms of stabilized commercial real estate, in terms of fund banking, in terms of some of the other asset categories, public sector finance, tend to make the weighted average risk rating of the overall portfolio better. And so I think you'll continue to see that, quite frankly, and we've mentioned it, you know, we'd like to see the sponsor business of some of our verticals that have higher risk return profiles and higher yields grow more. So it's not all by choice. It's also by what the market's giving us. But I think if you see continued benign credit environment and you continue to see trend lines in where we're growing assets, I think your supposition is correct that we would have less risk in the overall portfolio and we could still have room in that reserve as we move forward. Thank you. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Casey Haire with Autonomous Research. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. This is Jackson Singleton on for Casey Haire. Just starting out. I hear your thoughts on Marathon, but also wanted to follow up on loan growth. I mean, just given 11% annualized growth in 4Q and A, really just strong growth in all of 2026, it feels like the guide is still a little conservative. So just wondering if you can maybe provide some thoughts on kind of why the 5%-7%? Sure. You know, I do think that there was, and Neil mentioned the fact that there were lower payoffs than we had anticipated in the fourth quarter. So I think if you normalize that, we feel kind of our growth was a little bit kind of less than the headline number was. I think the other dynamic here is we've talked a lot about making sure we maintain our profitability and our returns as we move forward. So I think one of the things that Luis and Neil and I and the rest of the team have been doing is spending a lot of time thinking about, you know, sort of really deliberate capital allocations and looking at what businesses are going to continue to grow franchise value in the long term. We may be de-emphasizing some businesses and really looking at kind of core franchise building full relationships. So I think when you put everything together, as I said earlier, I think we do anticipate continued competition from private credit in the sponsor group. Although the moves we're making, hopefully we'll get a little bit more growth out of that business than is in our numbers. So that could help us surprise to the upside. But I think we think we can grow loans 5%-7% in a very profitable manner, continue to show at or better than market growth over time, and do it profitably. So we think that's the right number for growth. Could we outperform that if the economy continues to kind of hum along and we get a few breaks with respect to M&A activity and in the sponsor book? Yes. We think this is our best guess of optimal growth and profitability mix. Got it. Thanks for that. And then just my follow up is. On loan to deposit ratio. So the deposit guide, the midpoint of deposit guide's a little bit lower than the midpoint of the loan guide. So just wondering maybe is there any kind of ceiling for the loan to deposit ratio that you guys wouldn't want to go past and then maybe how. Should we think about the mix of deposit growth in 2026? Yeah, I'll start that one. We don't have a formal ceiling that we're looking at. You know, we are in the low 80% range. I personally believe sitting in the CFO seat that kind of in that low- to mid-85% range is the optimal place to be. So I would be surprised if we went over 85% and we plan to kind of stay more in that 80%-85% range. On the deposit growth side in the mix, the mix should be fairly similar to how we've grown loans this year. We are expecting a little bit more on the HSA side from the Bronze opportunity that we've talked about. We expect continued strong mid-20% growth from our Ametros business and then similar growth rates across the board in the other categories. Got it. Okay, perfect. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Chris McGratty with KBW. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. This is Chris O'Connell filling in for Chris. Hey, Chris. Hey. Just wanted to start off just quickly on the balance sheet. On the liability side, you know, on the end of period basis there seemed to be a bit of movement outsized here and there on the borrowing side. Anything driving that outside of seasonality and kind of the movement with the sub debt in the quarter? Nothing unusual, I guess I would say the one unusual factor relates to what you mentioned, the sub debt. So throughout the quarter we were a little bit elevated on the sub debt side with a long term debt just over, I think we're at $1.1 billion, slightly over $1.1 billion and we now sit at $650 million back where we wanted to be after we redeemed two outstanding notes. So we also have some seasonality in the quarter where I mentioned my prepared remarks, we had $1.2 billion of public funds leave. Those are already starting to flow back in for Q1 just so see seasonal trend. So you know, we offset some of that with broker deposits and FHLB advances. But during Q1 we'll see, as I mentioned, those public funds flow back in and the broker deposits reduce back down. Nothing unusual there, just some transactions that tie into seasonality and tie into our September sub debt issuance. Okay, great, thank you. Then you know, on the, on the fee guide, if I'm, you know, reading the, you know, numbers correct on a year-over-year basis, you know, it's a little bit of a wide. range, you know, 1% to nearly high single digits. Can you just, you know, maybe frame? Some of the drivers in growth for. Next year and kind of what would put you towards, you know, the lower. Or higher end of the upside? Yeah, we've talked about our fee earnings having kind of 4 major areas in the past. On our kind of healthcare services, our loan business and our deposit business, 3 of the main businesses, we kind of expect that steady, you know, 2%-4% growth from client activity. What really drives some variability in our fees are some of the unusual categories. When we look at BOLI, when we look at our CVA and when we look at some of our direct investments which have been very profitable for us, but do have some volatility leads us to leave a little bit wider range on our fee guide just because of that last 25% and some of the lumpiness of when those flows come in is how I would address that one. Yeah, I'd add one more thing. There is the, you know, a place where you see a little bit of seasonality and volatility but where we saw a lot of good performance in the third and fourth quarter in the back half of this year was in loan-related fees. So we actually did see with the, as has been pointed out in the call, with the higher origination activity that we saw and the growth that we saw in C&I and in CRE, we do get a fair amount of swaps, syndications and FX business as well. So what could potentially move it to the higher end of the range is if we continue to see good momentum in those, you know, kind of, we'll call it the larger commercial asset classes, then we feel very good that 2026 should be a good year for loan related fees and that could potentially move it a little bit higher towards that high end of the range as well. But tough to forecast those because it is very much driven by what overall origination activity is going to be. But it's a good opportunity. Great, thank you. Your next question comes from the line of David Chiaverini with Jefferies. Please go ahead. Hi, thanks for taking the questions. Wanted to start on HSA. How did the open enrollment season go? Because I know that normally leads to a nice bump in deposits in the first quarter. Yeah, David, so far so good is how we're characterizing it. So we're slightly ahead of where we were last year. We've opened up approximately about 15,000 more accounts than what we had at this point in 2025 and total account opening so far about, or just shy of 250,000. So we had, as we mentioned on prior calls, during the course of the year we've had a fair amount, we made a fair amount of investments on just broad-based client experience, new technology, new investment experience that led to some nice client wins. Obviously it's a competitive market so we had two client losses as well. But net, net the client wins have outweighed the client losses on the employer side. And so therefore we've seen some, you know, some nice momentum on, you know, account openings. And so we think that it should be. It sets up pretty well for having good performance, and we should be slightly ahead of where we were in 2025, you know, when you'll see, you know, for first quarter results. What we haven't seen yet and we're still waiting on is on the direct to consumer side. So the, you know, we had guided to the, you know, the new ACA opportunity to be a kind of slow moving target. I guess that's going to take some time for us to play out. We've seen account openings that are faster in our direct to consumer channel as of, you know, through this date, you know, last year. So we have seen growth, but we have not yet seen, you know, the type of growth that we think we're going to see over the balance of the year. We should see the direct to consumer channel, you know, kind of increase. The growth in account opening should accelerate over the course of the year and we should be able to continue to maintain the good and positive momentum that we have in the employer channel as well. We feel good about the business and where it is today. Great, thanks for that. Shifting over to capital management. Nice uptick in the buyback activity in the fourth quarter. Can you talk about, you know, the? Pace looking forward on the buybacks. And. I saw your CET1 11.2 with the near-term target 11% and long-term target 10.5. Can you talk about, you know, the timing of bringing that CET1 down? Sure. I think our kind of capital strategies from the top of the house remain the same. You know, we look to invest in organic growth and we're still looking at, for tuck-in acquisitions to enhance and supplement our healthcare verticals. If those aren't available to us, we obviously look to return capital to shareholders in the form of dividends or buybacks. I think we think that you could see another year like you saw in 2025 with respect to share repurchases as we move forward. As it relates to changing from our short term to our long term 10.5 target, I think you see that the industry en masse is kind of getting closer to pivoting. You've seen some people announce, we go through at the end of the first quarter and into the second quarter, our annual stress testing and capital management activities. And I think, you know, we're more likely than we were last year to feel comfortable to start to move that thing down after we go through that exercise. So I think we're a couple quarters away from giving you a little more specificity on moving that down, but we certainly feel more comfortable. The credit costs seem pretty clear and we've got some good economic momentum. So I think you'll continue to see us buy back shares absent other organic uses of capital. And I think we're getting more confident that we can start to breach that 11% CET1 ratio as we move through the year. Great, thank you. Thanks. David. Your next question comes from the line of Daniel Tamayo with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Good Morning. Maybe we can start on the credit. I know that's not as pressing that topic as it has been, but new year, maybe just kind of reset expectations and give your latest thoughts on the office book and what that could look like, any further sales, et cetera, for the coming year. Sure. You know, I feel really pretty good overall. I mean, I think we nailed it and I give credit to our chief credit officer in terms of, you know, calling the inflection point. We've had three good quarters of underlying risk rating migration trending. As you saw, we've materially reduced criticized, classified, and non-accrual loans. And so the overall credit profile I think continues to improve and be certainly well within our comfort levels. With respect to those two portfolios we've talked about over and over again, our office and our healthcare services, you know, they still represent a large portion of NPLs and classifieds, which you know, is sticky and frustrating but also really portends to the fact that the vast majority of the $55 billion loan book is performing really, really well. The way I would characterize office and this would also go to healthcare services is that I think we have it pretty much ring fenced. You know, we're about $720 million left in the office portfolio. There's a good amount that's performing, you know, as agreed. We've risk rated it appropriately, we've got the appropriate reserves and so, you know, we don't think it's going to be a big contributor as we move forward to kind of outsize non-accruals or losses. We could see obviously more as we try and resolve some of the sticky non-accruals we have now. You know, we'll make the right calls in terms of loan sales or charges, but we feel pretty good about the fact that we can operate within that 25-35 basis points annualized charge-off rate. Obviously when you're a commercial bank with big credits that can sort of bump around a little bit as you've seen in the last several quarters. But we feel pretty good that we've kind of, you know, have a good handle on everything in there and that we don't see any significant deterioration in that portfolio. And the same goes with the health care portfolio which is now down to like $400 million. So in aggregate those two portfolios are roughly $1 billion. We've identified the problems that are in them. We've adequately reserved and we're not, we're not as concerned to have contributions in big contributions in charges and NPLs going forward. Okay, great. Yep, that's great. Color. Thanks. And then, you know, we've talked a lot about the deposit portfolio today. You know, the non-interest-bearing side obviously tied to commercial loan growth, but it really has continued to trend down for reasons that you're growing in other areas. You had a lot of growth opportunities, understandably, but that has kind of continued to trend down over the last few years, even in quarters. Just curious if you. See a bottom. From a mix perspective with non-interest-bearing anytime soon. Thanks. Yeah. You know, I would answer that with two different directions. The first is saying that we are seeing a slowing pace in reductions in non-interest-bearing. For the full year we were down just over $200 million. So we believe that we're very close to an inflection point there. Looking at it a little differently as an organization, we really focus on non-interest-bearing including our healthcare services including priced at 15 basis points where we had $450 million in growth this year. So when we have a marginal dollar of marketing where we could put towards Ametros or towards the HSA versus going out and competing head to head for a new consumer client, we tend to go in the direction of our healthcare services book which is differentiated and we have strong opportunities there. Overall we kind of look at those combined and we do think for the pure non-interest bearing, excluding health care vertical we are close to an inflection point. I want to be clear that we still have a significant focus on driving core commercial and consumer relationships and non-interest-bearing accounts. We're investing in treasury management capabilities. We continue to push all of the line folks to make sure that they're deepening their share of wallet and that we're getting our share of operating business along with the loans we're making. I agree with Neal's comments, but I don't want that to be misconstrued that we're not still focused on making sure that we're growing kind of core traditional consumer and commercial deposits. Great, thanks for the color. Your next question comes from the line of David Smith with Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. Hey, David. You had mentioned that deposit. Competition was elevated in a lot of. Your geographic footprint right now. I'm wondering if you just help us. Frame within your broader footprint what areas are seeing more or less competition from a geography standpoint? Thank you. Yeah, I would put it across multiple categories. When we look at consumer CDs, we've seen some of the large banks in our market maintain very aggressive pricing. They were priced a little bit below some of those competitors at this point in time. The direct bank, we don't have a large portion of our portfolio there, you know, between $2 billion and $3 billion. But there's some offers still sitting out in the market well over 4% where we moved lower. The commercial side continues to be competitive as always, especially in our markets. So I would say it's generally across the board we're seeing a competitive landscape. As we talked about, we did move pricing down in the mid-December rate cut and we'll continue to be aggressive. But we do very much focus on that balance between liquidity and net interest margin. We feel like we're in a good spot. Competition does remain strong in the market. Thank you. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Manan Gosalia with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning all. Morning. You noted earlier on that loan yields were better this quarter than you previously anticipated. Can you talk about what's driving that? You also mentioned the credit spreads have tied in. So it seems like the loan growth is coming in higher yielding categories, I guess to our question, is that right? And if that is, then what is baked into the flattish NIM trajectory that you just spoke about? Yeah, I'll take the first one, the first question, and then Neal can answer on the NIM. So no, I don't think that we said that loan yields were better than expected in the fourth quarter. It was actually loan payoffs. And so part of the kind of better performance that we saw from a loan growth perspective and just the overall stability that we saw in the portfolio was driven by the fact that loan, you know, expectations regarding loan payoffs with rates and so forth did not turn out to be what we thought it was. So we actually better performances. So we were able to retain, you know, larger, larger percentage, particularly of the, of the commercial real estate book which, which was great on loan yields. It's competitive out there. And so we've seen similar to what we've been talking about a little bit on the deposit side. We've seen a bottoming out in an inflection point where spreads for the most part have contracted to where they're going to contract. And part of the spread contraction that we've seen in new originations for us is driven by the fact that we've been focusing on higher quality, just better, more middle of the fairway type of assets that are just by design going to have a tighter credit spread than, and things that are not middle of the fairway, not as bank eligible or as bank friendly from an asset class perspective. So, you know, we feel good about where the, you know, the origination and pipeline activity is for 2026. We think that spreads are going to help, you know, hold in relative to what we've seen for the back half of this year. And if anything, to the extent that there's a, you know, a better supply, demand imbalance with credit providers into the market relative to the loan demand, we think that there could be some, some potential for credit spreads to move slightly up over the course of the year. But that's not factored into our numbers today. And if anything, that would be, you know, that would be a positive. Yeah. Clearly, with market rates coming down, our overall loan yields for the quarter were down about 17 basis points. When we were sitting midway through the quarter and seeing the performance in the beginning of the quarter, we were expecting to see it come down a little bit more at the end of the quarter. We had a few positive movements and a little bit of change in mix that were better than we were anticipating. Overall from that middle of the quarter, clearly loan yields were down based on the overall market, but came in a little bit better than expected for the quarter. Got it perfect. And then just wanted to get your thoughts on the leveraged lending guidance being withdrawn? Does that help loan growth a little? But as you look out the next two or three years, and does that help you do more with clients that. You already have a deep relationship with? Yeah, it's a great question. I think the answer is it does not really change our financial outlook. I think it does give us a little more flexibility in terms of, you know, those kind of prescriptive guidance things. It's interesting the unintended consequences is you end up maybe doing transactions that are not as optimal and actually not as credit strong, but within a box of a prescriptive leverage covenant. This gives us a little more flexibility to do deals we know are good. You know, in the sponsor book, we've been in the business for 25 years and we're really good at it. So I would say, you know, during the course of the year, will it allow us to do, you know, 3-5 more transactions that we otherwise might have not done because of regulatory scrutiny that we know are really, really good transactions? Yes. Does that really move the needle and change our kind of forward look on loan growth or profitability? Probably not. It's factored into what we're giving in guidance. So I would kind of say it's definitely, and I know this question's been asked across. It's definitely not as impactful as people say, but it's another good sign consistent with a more constructive and tailored regulatory environment that gives good bankers and good bank management teams the ability to serve their customers better. That's very helpful, thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Bernard von-Gizycki with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Hey guys, good morning. Just my first question, sorry I missed this but I think you acquired SecureSave in December which adds employer sponsored emergency savings accounts. Can you just talk more on the? Acquisition sizing of the deal, any economics or any color you can share on that? Yeah. On the size of the deal, Bernard. We're not, you know, we didn't put anything out when we, when we announced it in terms of. So it's, you could assume that it's relatively small and it's already factored into all of the quarter-end balance sheet numbers and capital metrics and so forth. So it's a SecureSave is a relatively small company still. We could characterize it as almost in still pseudo startup phase but it does have, it's a market leader in that growing business of ESAs of emergency savings accounts. It's clearly or the mission of the business is focused on helping you know, large employers that have, you know, large workforces, you know, help those, you know, employees through an incremental benefit to being able to save for you know, eventuality specific rainy day funds and so forth. And so it's largely viewed as a retention tool by employers. It's a big, you know, kind of focal point point of HR officers for large employers are trying to figure out other ways to help those you know, places that have large employee workforces to just kind of put more arms around them and bear hug their employees to you know, to stay, you know, stay on and kind of limit turnover. But again it's a small business. We think that it has a lot of good potential. It's a product that we had started to sell through our HSA Bank channel to our employer clients for some time and saw some good receptivity. So we've been very familiar with the product for about the last year, year and a half and we think that this could be. Again, it's going to be well received into our existing channels. But we're also expanding the universe of potential large employers that we can now target because this is something that we think is going to be well received by the large world of human resources in large corporate. But more to come on how that business will continue to evolve and you'll start seeing. We'll call out deposit balances and start highlighting those as those flow in over the course of this year. Okay, great. Just a follow up. What is your appetite on further deals and how actively are you looking at them and you know any color on like pricing and is it just harder to find these type of like bolt-ons to add to the HSA business? Yeah, it is. I mean I think you know it's always a good question and we answer every year. We're obviously very active in, in looking to enhance two things: our deposit gathering, low-cost, long-duration deposit gathering capabilities. We've got a first-mover advantage in healthcare through HSA and Ametros or potentially adding more fee income streams to our business. We continue to look at those tuck-ins where we can, where we have been very transparent in the past that most banks are also looking at those two categories to grow and when companies go to auction the metrics in terms of tangible book value dilution and others get very challenging. I'd say we're active. If you think about it, since the Sterling MOE, we've done Bend in HSA, we've done InterSync, we've done SecureSave, we've done Ametros. So we have a really good track record I think of acquiring businesses that enhance our existing business and let us leverage our core competencies without making it shareholder unfriendly. And so I think that's the key. We'll continue to look at it. We'd love to do that sort of on a serial basis but again we're going to be really disciplined in terms of how much we pay and what we are looking to acquire. Great, thanks for taking my questions. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Jon Arfstrom with RBC. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning guys. Good morning Jon. Neal, question for you. On expenses, it looks like the fourth quarter run rate. The core run rate puts you at the low end of the 2026 guide which is fine. What do you think the slope looks like for the year on expenses? I think you said what does the slope look like? You were a little hard to hear but okay. Perfect background I guess maybe. Yeah. Yes. As I mentioned in prepared remarks, we'll move up seasonally a little bit in Q1 due to those three factors that I mentioned. Outside of that, I think fairly stable expenses on the quarters after. We're going to continue to invest in our client-facing businesses, look for opportunities to grow at the same time we'll be continuing, as we always do, to look for ways to drive efficiencies into the organization. So I would say that we'll have a few percentage point increase in the Q1, as I mentioned before, and, and then probably neutral to slight increase each quarter going forward. So not a material upslope after the first quarter. Okay, good, that helps. And then back on growth. I heard your comments on less payoffs. Maybe caused an aberration in growth, but do you have any reason for the lower payoff activity? It also looks like the way I see it, originations and commercial and commercial real estate are up pretty nicely. Is that seasonal? Is there something else going on there? Thank you. Yeah, I think that it's a little bit of seasonality. So it's a little bit of all the above that you mentioned. If you go back to the performance of 2025, first part of the year, first and second quarter, we did not have as much commercial real estate growth as you saw on the back end. So a little bit of that was pipeline buildings over the course of the year. And you know, so we continue to feel good that, you know, pipelines are building up nicely for 2026 as well. But you're unlikely to see the same type of growth trajectory that we saw in the fourth quarter on those specific, you know, CRE and C&I asset classes as you saw in the back half of the year. But then you'll see potentially some seasonality in the back half of 2026 as well. That could get you to the higher end of the range that we put out there today. So there's, you know, there's a little bit of all the above. Why did the expected payoffs, you know, perform better? It happens at times, you know, so we again, we think that there's, you know, we go through the portfolio, we have, you know, pretty good, you know, visibility on to, you know, how things will perform. You know, rate moves being a little bit later in the quarter than what we had originally anticipated. Also, you know, drove some of that performance. But, you know, rates continue to go down. You see, you should see some, you know, accelerated payoffs, particularly on the street. But, you know, we'll, we'll see what happens over the course of the year. And if rate comes, rate cuts do come, well, that will have some sort of impact. So it's a little bit of a conservative guide from that perspective. But the overall theme is pipelines are good. We feel good about the origination activity for the year and we think that there's, you know, there could be good potential opportunities for us to hit the high end of the range. Okay. All right, thank you very much. Your next question comes from the line of Anthony Elian with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Hi everyone. On the loan growth and deposit growth. Outlook, are you anticipating the growth within? Those ranges spread evenly throughout this year. Or do you think the growth will be more first half or second half weighted? You know that's always tough to predict. There is a general seasonality. Last year actually was a little bit different given the pipeline building in CRE. We had a stronger third quarter than you'd normally see. You know, the fourth quarter is usually the strongest quarter for us. But I think for our modeling purposes, thinking about kind of an even growth trajectory is, you know, you can build it into your models first quarter is usually a little bit slower. But again it has a lot to do with payoffs which we can't predict. So very difficult to give you kind of the seasonal growth aspects. Okay. And then on HSA and the $1 billion-$2.5 billion incremental. Deposit growth you could see from the bill over the next five years. Is all the necessary infrastructure technology in place? To support that growth or is there? Any further buildout required? Thank you. No build out required. From a technology perspective. It's in place and we feel very good that we've made the investments that if there's a mad rush of potentially to say, clients trying to open up accounts through our direct to consumer channel, that we have all the capabilities and scalability to be able to take that on at no incremental cost to where we are today. So we feel very good about that tech investments that we've made there. Great, thank you. Thank you. That concludes our question-and-answer session. John, I'll turn it to you for closing remarks. Yes, just want to thank everyone for joining us today. Hope you can survive the storm this weekend no matter where you are and enjoy the day. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation and you may now disconnect.