Good morning, and welcome to the WesBanco third quarter 2021 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing Star, then zero on your telephone keypad. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press Star then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press Star then two. Please limit yourself to a couple of questions and you can re-enter the queue to allow others to ask. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to John Iannone, investor relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, Andrew. Good morning, and welcome to WesBanco, Inc.'s third quarter 2021 earnings conference call. Leading the call today are Todd Clossin, President and Chief Executive Officer, Bob Young, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Dan Weiss, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Today's call, an archive of which will be available on our website for one year, contains forward-looking information. Cautionary statements about this information and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are included in our earnings-related materials issued yesterday afternoon, as well as our other SEC filings and investor materials. These materials are available on the investor relations section of our website, wesbanco.com. All statements speak only as of October 27th, 2021, and WesBanco undertakes no obligation to update them. I would now like to turn the call over to Todd. Todd. Thank you, John, and good morning, everyone. On today's call, we'll review our results for the third quarter of 2021 and provide an update on our operations in 2021 outlook. Key takeaways from the call today are WesBanco remains a well-capitalized financial institution with solid liquidity, strong balance sheet, solid credit quality. We're committed to expense management while we continue to make the appropriate investments, including strategic hires across our organization and markets to enhance our ability to leverage our growth opportunities. We remain focused on ensuring a strong organization for our shareholders and will continue to appropriately return capital to them through both long-term sustainable earnings growth and effective capital management. We're pleased with our performance during the third quarter as we delivered solid pre-tax, pre-provision earnings and managed discretionary expenses. For the quarter ending September 30, 2021, we reported net income available to common shareholders of $45.4 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.70 when excluding merger and restructuring charges. On the same basis, pre-tax, pre-provision income was $57.8 million or $60.4 million when excluding settlement costs with respect to the pending resolution of a lawsuit of $2.6 million that we incurred during the quarter. We reported strong pre-tax, pre-provision return on assets and average tangible equity of 1.34% and 14.73% respectively. Reflecting our strong legacy of credit and risk management, our key credit quality ratios remained at low levels, and our regulatory capital ratios remained well above the applicable well-capitalized standards as well as remained favorable to peer bank averages. The significant amount of excess liquidity across our local economies, combined with the supply chain and labor constraints, continue to temporarily impact loan growth. So far this year, we have generated nearly $1.3 billion in new commercial loan production, with 35% of that occurring during the third quarter. Our commercial pipeline is building again and approaching $600 million, with more than a third of that pipeline coming from our more recently acquired higher growth markets in Maryland and Kentucky. Further, our residential mortgage pipeline remains strong, which bodes well for originations the next couple of quarters. While up slightly from last quarter, commercial line of credit utilization is still about 12 percentage points or so below the historical mid- to upper-40% range as companies have excess liquidity or delayed growth opportunities due to supply issues. We continue to experience high commercial real estate project payoffs via an aggressive secondary market that is flush with liquidity, searching for yield, and offering very generous rates and terms or purchasing projects outright due to a strong cap rate based valuations. Through the first nine months of this year, we've had more than $630 million of commercial real estate project payoffs, far outpacing the $450 million we experienced during 2020 and the $500 million we experienced during the full year of 2019. While we expect our commercial real estate projects to go to the secondary market for permanent financing, it's been happening at a much earlier point in their projected timelines, creating a short-term mismatch with our new production to offset the runoff. We anticipate commercial real estate payoffs to be slightly elevated during the fourth quarter before returning to much more historical numbers around $85 million a quarter range during next year. On the positive side, we generated more than $90 million of new construction loans during the third quarter, which will fund over the next 12 to 18 months. A key investment we are making is the investment in our employees as they are critical to our long-term growth and success. During the third quarter, we redeployed some of the savings from our optimization efforts to raise the hourly wage in order to retain and attract, which is having a positive impact. In addition, we continue to formulate plans to make strategic hires across our organization and markets to enhance our ability to leverage growth opportunities once they fully return. Throughout the year so far, we have made more than 35 revenue producing hires in key markets across our organization in order to strengthen our teams and enhance our ability to leverage future growth opportunities. These hires have been concentrated in our commercial lending, residential lending, and wealth management groups. Our new residential mortgage loan production office in Northern Virginia, which I mentioned in July, has hit the ground running, producing approximately 5% of our originations during the quarter. In addition to ongoing efforts to add wealth management personnel in our metro markets, we are implementing plans to hire an additional 20 commercial lenders, whether individuals or teams, over the next year or so. These hiring plans are focused on both our existing metro markets and potential new metro markets that would be adjacent to our existing franchise footprint. We believe that our diversified revenue engines and footprint, combined with our experienced teams and hiring plans, make us well-positioned to take advantage of future growth opportunities. Over the long term, we still anticipate mid- to upper-single-digit loan growth. I remain proud of our entire organization as it remained diligently focused on serving the financial needs of our customers and our communities throughout the pandemic, the reopening of our economies, and throughout the completion of our core banking software system conversion. For the second year in a row, we've been named to Newsweek Magazine's ranking of the best banks, which recognize those institutions that best serve their customers' needs. This great accolade follows one we received a few months ago, where we were named for the third consecutive time one of the world's best banks on customer satisfaction. These recognitions are a testament to the hard work and dedication of our employees, our focus on our better banking pledge to deliver superior customer service, and our efforts to provide our customers with high-quality products and services, and the ability to access them when it best meets their schedule, whether in person or through our full range digital platform. I would also like to congratulate our community development team, led by LaReta Lowther, for their receipt of the ABA Foundation Community Commitment Award for Community and Economic Development. This prestigious national award is for their strong performance and outreach with our New Markets Loan Program, as well as recognition of our strong community banking roots. Through our New Markets Loan Program and other innovative programs, our goal is to promote meaningful, community-driven investments and fund a wide variety of business providing critical and social commercial services to low-income communities. Lastly, on August second, we completed the conversion of our core banking software system to FIS's IBS platform. This was an important project that involved hundreds of employees across our organization to ensure its success. This dynamic platform provides improved operational efficiencies, capabilities for growth opportunities, including partnerships with Fintechs, and enhanced products and services for our customers. Just some of the digital enhancements include the national person-to-person payments network, Zelle, which we are now on, enhanced security measures, robust personal financial management tools to allow account aggregation, budgeting and spending targets, and the ability to stop or release payments online. As I said before, I firmly believe that during the last couple of years, with our investments in Kentucky and the Mid-Atlantic region and our new core operating system, we have solidified our evolution into a strong regional financial services company that is supported by several unique competitive advantages. I'd now like to turn the call over to Bob Young, our CFO, for an update on our third quarter financial results and the current outlook for the fourth quarter of 2021. Bob? Thank you, Todd. Good morning. I have a bit of a cold, so I'll try to stay focused here, but you might hear a bit of a raspy voice. During the third quarter, we experienced a continued low interest rate environment negatively impacting our margin, and we retained significant amounts of excess liquidity. That was somewhat mitigated by continued strong residential mortgage origination volumes and discretionary expense controls. We continued to make important growth-oriented investments and also experienced improvements in both the macroeconomic forecasts and qualitative factors utilized in our CECL accounting standard for the allowance for credit loss calculation. As noted in last night's earnings release, we reported improved GAAP net income available to common shareholders of $41.9 million, and earnings per diluted share of $0.64 for the three months ended September 30, 2021. Excluding restructuring and merger-related charges, results were $0.70 per share for the quarter as compared to $0.66 last year. For the nine months ended September 30, we reported GAAP net income available to common shareholders of $180.5 million, and earnings per diluted share of $2.71. Again, excluding restructuring and merger-related charges, results were $2.79 per share for the current year-to-date period as compared to $1.14 last year. Pre-tax, pre-provision income and related returns have been very strong on a year-to-date basis, although somewhat lower for the quarter due to our reduced net interest margin affecting net interest income and somewhat higher expenses. Total assets of $16.9 billion as of September 30, 2021, increased 2.1% year-over-year, due mainly to growth in the securities portfolio from excess liquidity related to higher cash balances from our customers' receipt of various stimulus program benefits, as well as higher personal savings. Total portfolio loans decreased 9.8% year-over-year to $9.9 billion, due primarily to forgiveness of $940 million of SBA Paycheck Protection Program loans, $278 million of which occurred during the third quarter, as well as a higher level of commercial real estate loan payoffs. Excluding PPP loans, total loans decreased 4.9% year-over-year and 1.8% sequentially, reflecting the previously noted commercial real estate payoffs, continued lower commercial line of credit utilization, and the impact of selling a higher percentage of one to four family residential mortgage originations into the secondary market. The unusually high CRE payoffs impacted total loan growth by approximately 2 percentage points, and the residual impact of the sale of a higher percentage of residential mortgages through the first few months of 2021 was almost another 2 percentage points. Strong deposit growth continues to be a key story as total deposits increased 10% year-over-year to $13.4 billion, due to the previously mentioned stimulus-related program funds received by our individuals and business customers and continued higher levels of personal savings. Total demand deposits were up 16.5% year-over-year. Furthermore, reflecting this strong growth and resulting available excess liquidity, we've continued to strengthen our balance sheet by reducing higher cost certificates of deposit, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, and short-term borrowings, which declined 20.7%, 73.7%, and 60.1% year-over-year respectively, for a total higher cost funding reduction of $1.2 billion. Key credit quality metrics such as non-performing assets, criticized and classified loans, and net loan charge-offs as percentages of total portfolio loans have remained at low levels and favorable to peer bank averages as measured with those with total assets between $10 billion and $25 billion in recent quarters. Further, we have experienced very low annualized net charge-offs to average loans of just one basis point on a year-to-date basis. The net interest margin of 3.08% for the third quarter of 2021 increased 23 basis points year-over-year, primarily due to the lower interest rate environment as well as the mix shift of securities to approximately 23% of total assets versus 17% last year. The investment securities portfolio increased $1.1 billion year-over-year as a result of the higher cash balances from our customers' higher personal savings, creating extra liquidity to invest. This additional cash liquidity negatively impacted the net interest margin by approximately 8 basis points for the quarter and a similar amount year to date. Reflecting the significantly lower interest rate environment, we have reduced all posted deposit rates, including certificates of deposit, throughout the past year, which helped to lower our deposit funding cost 12 basis points year-over-year to 14 basis points for the third quarter of 2021, or nine basis points when including non-interest bearing deposits. Across a number of fee income categories, we are seeing the benefit of organic growth and a return to a more normal operating environment. Non-interest income for the quarter ended September 30 was $32.8 million, a decrease of 5.4% year-over-year, primarily due to lower mortgage banking income, down some $3.9 million to $4.6 million from the record level recorded in the prior year period, which was primarily due to selling a lower percentage of loans to the secondary market this particular quarter, as well as lower gain on sales spreads. During the third quarter, we sold about 40% of loans into the secondary market versus 75% last year on total originations of $382 million, and about 60% of that was either purchase money or construction. We pivoted to holding more mortgage loan originations during the second quarter, and portfolio loans were up during the quarter as compared to the second quarter as a result. Reflecting new team hires and overall higher demand, we have now experienced the sixth consecutive quarter of above $300 million in mortgage loan production. We also continue to see nice organic growth across our wealth management businesses, including trust, up 13.4% for the quarter, securities brokerage, up 13.9% for the quarter, and private banking, all of which are benefiting from the current market environment as well as unrestricted access to our financial centers to hold one-on-one client meetings. Finally, BOLI was up 27.2% due to additional mortality benefits of about $700,000, as well as an additional tranche of purchased BOLI, which added an additional $200,000 for the quarter. Total operating expenses remain well controlled, as demonstrated by a year-to-date efficiency ratio of 57%. While we continue to focus appropriately on expenses, we have redeployed some of the savings from our various efficiency and optimization efforts to make the necessary investments in our technology and digital banking platforms, as well as our employees to support future growth opportunities. Excluding restructuring and merger-related expenses, non-interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2021 increased $3.9 million or 4.5% to $90.2 million compared to the prior year period, primarily due to $2.6 million of settlement costs with respect to the pending resolution of a lawsuit included within other operating expenses as well as higher salaries expense. When excluding the settlement costs, our operating expenses for the quarter were $87.6 million, which included an additional $1.4 million in healthcare costs as compared to the second quarter. Salaries and wages primarily increased year-over-year due to higher short-term incentive and stock related compensation expense, which somewhat offset lower salary expense from a lower base of full-time equivalent employees as branch closures and back office savings were realized. We have successfully balanced the management of full-time equivalent employee counts with necessary annual merit increases, as well as a recent increase in base hourly wages. As of September 30, 2021, we reported strong capital ratios of Tier 1 risk-based capital of 14.18%, Tier 1 leverage of 10.10%, CET1 of 12.91%, and total risk-based capital of 16.38%, as well as a tangible common to tangible assets ratio of 9.12%. During the third quarter, we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock on the open market for a total cost of $71.3 million. As of September 30, approximately 2.96 million shares remain for repurchase under the existing share repurchase authorization. I might mention that since the end of the quarter through last night, we have repurchased an additional approximate 0.7 million shares at a total cost of about $24 million. Well, let me just provide some wrap up thoughts on our current outlook for the fourth quarter. As an asset sensitive bank, we do remain subject to factors expected to affect industry-wide net interest margins in the near term. We continue to believe that our GAAP net interest margin will decrease a few basis points during the fourth quarter due to lower purchase accounting accretion, lower PPP net fee accretion, and lower earning asset yields on new loans and securities. While we anticipate some continued reduction in deposit and borrowing costs as CDs reprice and borrowings are paid off, transaction costs are at relative floor levels, so there just is not as much room to lower overall liability costs. As previously announced, we did pay off $25 million of acquisition related subordinated debt in the third quarter and have recently announced our intention to pay off another $35 million in the fourth quarter, which was inherited from the Old Line Bank merger in 2019. Total savings from these two payoffs will approximate $2.8 million annualized. In general, we continue to anticipate similar trends in both core non-interest income and non-interest expense absent the settlement costs as we experienced during the third quarter of 2021. Based on the quarter-end pipeline, residential mortgage origination should also remain strong during the fourth quarter, and we continue to intend to place a relatively higher percentage of these loans into the residential loan portfolio as compared to earlier in the year. The provision for credit losses under CECL will mostly depend upon changes to the macroeconomic forecast and qualitative factors related to hotels and the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as various credit quality metrics, including potential charge-offs, criticized and classified loan levels, delinquencies, as well as other portfolio changes. In general, continued improvements in macroeconomic and other noted factors should result in a continued reduction in the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans over time, with lower levels of provision releases as compared to earlier this year. Share repurchase activity will depend upon pricing levels and volume restrictions under existing SEC guidance, as well as current remaining repurchase authorizations. Lastly, we currently anticipate our effective full year tax rate to be between 20% and 21%, subject to changes in tax legislation, deductions and credits, and taxable income levels. We are now ready to take your questions. Operator, would you please review the instructions? Yes, thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you'd like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please limit yourself to a couple of questions and you can reenter the queue to allow others to ask. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question comes from Brody Preston of Stephens Inc. Please go ahead. Morning, Brody. Hey, good morning, everyone. Can you hear me? Yeah. All right, great. Thanks, thanks for taking my questions. I'll try to be brief here. Just wanted to get some additional color on the C&I pay downs. Was there a common theme among them in terms of geography, industry, customer profile? No, I would say too, you know, we're pretty generous in terms of how we categorize C&I. You noticed we talked in our prepared remarks about $250 million worth of commercial real estate loans go into the secondary market. A lot of that's showing up in the C&I classification line item because of the way we categorize things. The C&I line usage actually was up a little bit during the third quarter. Net loan balances in the C&I was actually up a little bit in July and August, $2 million. It's those C&I loans that we categorize as more commercial real estate based upon percentage of ownership and things like that. It's really the commercial real estate loans going to the secondary market or properties just being sold outright because of the cap rates. That's what's driving that number as opposed to maybe some of our peers would categorize C&I primarily as, you know, lines of credit and equipment loans and owner-occupied and stuff like that. We're gonna look at that for future reporting periods. That's really the commercial real estate that's going to the secondary market showing up in that number. Okay, great. You know, the core loan yields are actually holding up fairly well, but when I look at the roll on roll-off delta that you guys provide on the commercial side, it's about 60 basis points. How do you see core loan yields kind of trending for the book yields going forward? You know, how are kind of new origination yields, you know, in the month of October coming on, just given the leg up and, you know, the ten-year and the belly of the curve? Sure, sure. Bob, I'll pass that to you. Yeah, sorry. I just wanted to get off mute there. At this point, that 60 basis points as you referenced, I think is going to be lower than that. We've already seen a pretty significant leg down in terms of repricing. While we do have a lot of loans, as I've indicated in the past, that have floor rates, there's some opportunity there for repricing as well as renegotiation of some of those rates. I do believe that 60 basis points delta will come down for two reasons. One, what's repricing in the portfolio is at a lower rate, number one. Number two, as you point out, Brody, new loans are going on here in the fourth quarter at slightly higher rates. That number that's in the PowerPoint is a combination of new loan pricing as well as loans repricing in the existing portfolio. If you have something repricing, you know, at 2.50 over LIBOR or the new SOFR spread, then you know, you are going to get something less than 3%. Relative to new loan pricing, our target remains between 3% and 3.25% for new loans. Got it. If I could just sneak one more in before I hop back into the queue. You referenced how well you've taken down the FHLB borrowings, Bob, you know, of the $200 or so that you have remaining. What does the maturity schedule look like? You know, would you look to kind of get rid of the rest of those moving? There really isn't that much for us to do an early redemption. I do note that we have the Old Line sub-debt coming off. I think between that and the old YCB sub-debt that we paid off in September, those are two critical payoffs of relatively expensive debt. They had repriced in the 4.60 area, 4.70. That certainly will be helpful going forward. In terms of the Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, there's another $25 million in the fourth quarter, and there's about $125 million in all of 2022. Then just some residual borrowings that reprice in 2023. Not much after 2022. Great. Thank you very much. Those are my questions. Thanks. The next question comes from Casey Whitman with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Hi, Casey. Hey, good morning. Maybe turning to expenses. So, you know, if we call core expenses $88 million or so this quarter, sounds like that might be a pretty good run rate for you going forward. Or do you think, you know, there's a possibility we can get back to the mid-$80s million just due to lower healthcare costs or savings from the core conversion? Or, you know, is this $88 million sort of the run rate? Yeah. I'll let Bob dive in and provide some more color. It does you know, we kind of hit the pandemic low point, I think, in the second quarter with regard to expenses, and there were a lot of one-time things that went in our favor, on that. I think what you're seeing with the healthcare costs, you know, being the $1.4 million in the third quarter, that's a big number. Not sure that's going to repeat itself. We got, you know, another $0.5 million or so worth the salary increases and stuff that we did that would start to flow through. I think we're back, you know, close to kind of what we were at kind of pre-pandemic, you know, in that you know $88 million range or something like that. We'll see how that plays out. That's you know, I don't think that's probably upper 80s is not a bad number to look at. Bob, do you have any more color to that? Well, I just would say that we did experience throughout the year higher equipment and digital software costs, digital banking costs, I should say, related, not necessarily to the core conversion, but prior to the core conversion, as people pivoted to using more mobile and internet banking solutions. That's true for the industry, not just for us. Of course, there were obviously hard costs related to that. Also, the PPP program itself generates a lot of costs upfront, which we defer. So that's part of net deferred fees. But there are also back-end costs on the forgiveness side. For every loan that's forgiven, we pay something like $125 through the fintech platform that we use. That's part of that as well. Just, you know, higher electronic banking usage, Visa debit card usage, all of that goes into that higher digital banking cost. We do have all of that priced into the FIS charge on a monthly basis going forward. We do anticipate that as compared to the way we paid that bill in the past, and we run a different core system still with FIS, we will see some savings just in terms of how much we're paying on a monthly basis for each account processed. Almost all of these digital and internet banking costs other than Visa are included in one monthly charge per account. I think there was a fair amount of that that came through expenses here in the second and third quarter, although we did reclass some of it into merger-related and restructuring, I should say. I think Todd's right. We would be guiding, particularly with the salary increase and the hourly wage increase, to that $87 million-$88 million number here in the short term. Mm-hmm. Would a reasonable expectation for growth off of that in 2022 be, you know, for, like, the low single digits? Or is that, you know, is that a reasonable outlook? Yeah. Just from my perspective, I have to look at it. You know, as you know, we don't give guidance out in future years and things. Mm-hmm. We kind of focus more on ratios and things like that. You know, we got two things. One thing working in our favor, one thing maybe working against a little bit. You know, Bob mentioned the kind of ability to scale at a lower cost because of the new FIS system that we're on, IBS and the per customer charge versus asset size charge. That'll help us over the longer term keep expenses down. We are investing, right, on the revenue side. You know, I want to make sure that we're really well positioned to resume the loan growth and get to that mid- to upper single-digit loan growth number. That's something we're extremely focused on. You know, the addition of you know, another 20 or so hires, things like that, you know, we're gonna invest in the franchise in order to get the growth that we wanna get at in the markets we're in. That'll add a little bit of expense. At the same time, I think the core operating system will bring some expenses down over time as well. Yep. Okay. The last question for me, but the $4.5 million restructuring charge, so is that mostly related to the core systems conversion? Are there any sort of other non-recurring charges we can expect, I guess, in the fourth quarter? Or are you pretty much done with those? No. Bob, you may jump in on that. That's really it. Those are a lot of the contract termination costs and things like that. Okay. Associated with switching the core. Okay. That should be in the third quarter. Yeah. Well, thank you. There were a few branch lease cost terminations, Casey, from the six branches that we closed in July. The bulk of that is related to the core conversion and is over. Okay. I'll let someone else jump on. Thank you. Thanks. The next question comes from Russell Gunther with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead. Hi, Russell. Hey, good morning, guys. Hey, Todd. Good morning, Bob. It sounds like you have some visibility into next quarter. The paydowns are gonna remain elevated here. I'm just curious if you guys can extend that at all in the next, you know, coming quarters. Any confidence that you'll return to that $85 million more normalized rate in the first half of next year? Yeah. I mean, that's what our anticipation is right now. It's hard, you know, to project out quarter to quarter. I mean, we did not see the high level of commercial real estate payoffs in the third quarter. We knew it was gonna be high, but we didn't know it was gonna be as high as it was. I think a lot of other banks have made the same comments in terms of things that went to the secondary market. You know, right now, looking at the fourth quarter, you know, we don't see huge numbers there, but we didn't see huge numbers there at the beginning of the last quarter either, right? I would expect that some of the aggressiveness I'm seeing, particularly with, you know, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, I mean, they're doing. It's amazing. I don't know if you heard this from others, but I mean, we've seen five-year interest only on loans that are 75% loan to value, 10 years interest only on loans that are less than 70% loan to value. We've seen projects taking not just before stabilization, we've seen them taken during construction. You know, we're kind of competing against the government here as an industry, and they're doing some things that we just don't think makes sense. I don't know how long that's gonna continue. There's a lot of liquidity there, but maybe not as much, what I would say kind of, you've heard a number of banks talk about protecting the integrity of the balance sheet, and I think that's the important thing to be doing right now. It's, you know, there's just some crazy things that are going on out there and fixed rates for long periods of time under 2.5%. We're trying to be prudent about what we're doing. With the high cap rates that are out there, you can't blame customers for just taking a property and just selling it outright, and liquefying, and then, you know, turning around and investing it somewhere else down the road. I don't blame the customers for doing what they're doing. I think it's smart. At the same time, I think that it's temporary, it's short-lived. Just don't know whether it's this quarter or next quarter or when it's gonna stop. At some point in time, you know, I think it will return to a more normalized level. I'm really looking hard at the, you know, the new construction loans that we're booking that'll be funding over the next 12-18 months. You know, we have $400 million-$500 million worth of construction loans on the books that have not completely funded yet. You know, we've got that dynamic working for us. We also have a very aggressive secondary market that seems to wanna get into the construction business. I think that's gonna be interesting to see how that interplay works out. Understood. That's very helpful, Todd. Thank you. You know, you reiterated the longer-term goal of a mid- to upper-single-digit loan growth number. I'm just curious, given the, you know, goalpost of adding 20 commercial lenders in existing and adjacent metro markets, do you think that type of production added is enough to kind of get you to the low end, given the other headwinds that we discussed? Yeah, I think so. You know, because we're doing a number of things, you know, operationally to speed up our process and become more efficient. You know, we went through the PPP loan program. You know, we used a company called Numerated that kind of helped us automate that whole thing. We're looking to use that on a broader basis throughout our company for non-commercial real estate related loans. You know, we should be able to turn loans around really quick. That's gonna be a huge lift in productivity for our existing lending staff. I would also mention too that you know over the last 18 months or so you know we did a core conversion. Probably our largest acquisition we ever made was you know over that within that last 18-24-month time period. Then we you know we did our own core upgrade from a core that we were on for 45 years. In doing all of that you know remote and everything I mean that's a heavy lift. That was a heavy lift for our employee base. Those are behind us now. Now we can kind of, you know, look forward in terms of I think increasing the productivity level of our existing people, not only because of the technology improvements that we've implemented, but now, you know, we're able to focus them externally as opposed to you got to get through seven training classes before Friday type of thing that they've been dealing with for the last year and a half because of the new core conversion. The 20 people, you know, that's if we can find more, we'll do more. I think that'll be a part of it. The big part of it's gonna be just the productivity lift that we would expect to see out of our existing staff. Okay. Thank you for your thoughts, guys. I will jump back in the queue. Sure. Thanks. The next question comes from Catherine Mealor with KBW. Please go ahead. Hi, Catherine. Hey. Hey, good morning. I wanted to just circle back on growth, and it looks like at least the residential mortgage portfolio inflected a little bit this quarter. We saw modest growth. Do you think we've hit a bottom in the residential mortgage portfolio and you'll start to see more growth there, which I think may help just kind of at least kind of support the loan portfolio, given that we still have some pay downs on the commercial real estate, at least next quarter? Yeah. We actually, third quarter was our second-best production quarter ever in residential mortgage lending, and pretty close to our first best, I think was a year earlier. You know, we feel like we're doing a really good job on the residential mortgage side with the production level. Bob mentioned, we're holding a little more on our balance sheet now. That's to provide a little more growth orientation as well, too. We've continued to invest. I mean, of the 30 or so, 35 or so people that we hired over the last year in revenue-producing roles, 16 or 17 of those were mortgage loan originators. The rest were commercial bankers. I think what I mentioned in my prepared comments in Northern Virginia, that team that we bought on that did about 5% of our overall mortgage production. We would expect to continue to invest in the business and to continue to grow it. Yeah, I feel good about the performance that the team has had. Great. I would assume with that you'll continue to have lower levels of residential mortgage fee income as you keep more on the balance sheet, you know, and sell less in the secondary market. As an offset to the lower mortgage and fees, maybe perhaps service charges, it feels like that had a really nice boost this quarter. What's the kind of normalized level that you think we can return to on service charges? Is it fair to look back? I mean, I guess we've got Durbin, but you know, is it fair to kind of look back at 2019 and kind of adjust to those levels? Or how should we think about normalized service charges and banking fees? Yeah. Bob and Dan might have some color on that, too. You know, the pandemic. Well, first of all, you're right on the residential mortgage side. The more we put on our books, you know, the less in secondary market fees that we would have. But the pandemic changed a lot of things. The acceleration of digital was very significant. Fortunately for us, Durbin was far enough in the rear view mirror. It was a couple of years ago, so you know, it's not in any of our run rates or comparisons in terms of comparing to pre-Durbin. But the acceleration in just the digital usage by the customer base has been really positive for us. I think the other thing to think about longer term and what we're really trying to invest in with our insurance product and having that be digital and fee income associated with that is. You know, banks in general, you know, we're gonna be facing this changes in overdraft fees going forward. You see some of the big players, not even big players, some of the larger regionals or mid-size regionals now that are coming out and kind of you know, attacking that with different programs and things. I think that's something we got to think about, maybe not over the next year or two, but definitely over the next five, six years. You know, what are the kind of the fee income sources that are gonna offset that? We think insurance is a big part of that. But digital adoption is something that we think is gonna continue. It's not gonna go back to the way it was pre-pandemic. I think you may see some more branch visits than you had during the pandemic, but so much has shifted online. We really think that's gonna be the channel. Bob, Dan, what would you add to that? I would just say that we were happy the service charges saw an increase this quarter because really we've been saying publicly that with all of the liquidity that is in people's accounts, really there hasn't been the propensity to use overdraft capability that our folks have to as great a degree. It was nice to see that. As compared to last year, we've really seen a nice growth rate, and particularly just since the first and second quarter of this year. Todd did talk about electronic banking fees. That's both due to an adjustment to a new settlement provider as well as just higher usage here in the quarter. I do think that both of those run rate going forward. Todd didn't mention this, but I did in my script. Wealth management really has seen some nice growth and continue to experience that here in the third quarter as well. Of course, some of that's market related, but really are seeing some good pull through in our main wealth management businesses now, securities, brokerage, trust, and private banking relative to customer additions. Maybe my last question is just a big picture profitability question. I'm sure that the efficiency ratio will suffer a little bit in the near term as you add on new lenders before they're fully ramped up and you kind of return to a better growth rate. What kind of band do you put on the efficiency ratio where you'll be comfortable bringing that up to, and kind of what limitations you'll put on yourself with expense growth until you can start to see some better revenue growth? Thanks. Yeah, that's a great question. You know, how much do you load, right? Do you load into the expense column to get the revenue generation out of it. Bob, Dan, and I now will be looking very closely at just positive operating leverage. We've always tried to drive that so that, you know, within the year that we're making the expense, we're getting a good positive operating leverage turn on that. You would expect to get that on lenders that you're hiring into the organization and whatnot, even if they've gotten on non-solicits for a year or so. They still ought to be productive and be able to grow. I also think that the productivity lift that we ought to get because of the new system and being past the pandemic and all the training and everything is gonna help us dramatically be able to keep the efficiency ratio down to a reasonable level. You know, I think I look at it and say we've always been in kind of the top third, a best third, so to speak, in efficiency ratio. I'd like to continue to stay there. I don't know what the yield curve is gonna do. I just don't have, you know, much of a clue for that. It's hard to peg a number. We've always said we wanted to, you know, stay in the mid-50s, and we've been able to do that as we went up and over $10 billion and all that stuff. As the, you know, the market continues to move forward, you know, what's gonna be the normalized, you know, good rate? Good rate used to be mid-50s. Is that still what it's gonna be? I think the yield curve is gonna drive an awful lot of that. It's hard to pick a number. I would say we're really focused on, obviously, is the quality of the balance sheet, which I think we've really done a good job with that. We've pruned the portfolio over a number of years, and that's impacted growth to some extent as we've, you know, kind of right-sized our indirect portfolio and multifamily and hotel and things like that. Those are behind us. So we don't have things that we're trying to, you know, shrink or anything like that going forward. Everything's kind of in the growth mode. With the markets we're in now because of the acquisitions in Kentucky and Maryland, you know, we're coming out of the pandemic in a much different situation than we were in six, seven years ago with regard to growth markets and people in growth markets. The low-cost deposit base that we've got, while it doesn't seem to add a lot of value right now because everybody's got rates this low, if rates start rising, we've got, you know, back three years ago in 2018, we really outperformed the market significantly because our deposit costs don't go up as rates start to go up, and that all falls to the bottom line for us. Those deposit numbers continue to go up. I think natural gas is gonna be the transition fuel for quite a while. I think we're all starting to see that. That bodes really, really well for this franchise, in terms of, you know, we don't lend into it, but the deposit benefits, the wealth management benefits of it. I look at all those things together, and I feel really bullish about where we are in the future, particularly with the new core and everything that we've got. Those things that we can control, I think we're gonna do a good job with, but I just don't know where the long-term rates are gonna be. You know, if we can get the rates up over 2% on the 10-year and the spread between the two-year and the five-year to grow, then yeah, I think it's really possible to stay in the fifties. If the yield curve doesn't cooperate, though, I'm not sure you're gonna see many banks that are going to be there. We're going to continue to invest in growth. This is a growth franchise that we've been saying that for a long time. That's why we made the acquisitions that we made. We know that's, you know, what we got to prove. We're not going to be penny wise and pound foolish. Long answer, but thought I'd just get that out there. That's great. Thank you very much. Sure. The next question comes from Steve Moss with B. Riley Securities. Please go ahead. Good morning, everybody. This is Steve's associate sitting in for him today. Just a quick question on credit here. MPAs came down, criticized loans came down as well this quarter, but the reserves seem to still be holding strong. Sort of curious, what is the timeline there to get things back to that day one reserve ratio? Sort of what's the pathway to get there? Yeah, I think with the timing on reserve releases, you know, everybody's kind of in different places on that. I think, you know, I think we released like $0.10 more in reserves in the second quarter than the market was thinking, and maybe even more in the first quarter and less this quarter. You know, everybody's got their own kind of contour to this based upon their own CECL calculations and assumptions. I kind of look at, you know, where you at from a loan loss reserve perspective, and we're like, you know, 1.37%. The peer group's like 1.25%-1.30%. We're right there with the peer group, even though how we got there and how they got there, it's all different. We all end up in about the same place right now. We would expect as credit continues to improve and continues to strengthen. I mean, we're seeing the RevPAR on hospitality now in line with where it was in 2019. So that's good. That bodes well for the future. You know, we would expect that you would continue to have this contour, the trend in downward reserves. You know, I'm hopeful that the next year we're also putting loan growth on and obviously you want to reserve for new loan growth as well too. How that all sorts out. I think we've said in the past, it's not just us, but the industry that, you know, maybe the end of next year, end of 2022 or end of 2023, you know, you might see kind of getting back to day one CECL. You also got to look at, you know, what's the office portfolio going to look like nationwide and stuff like that. There are things that'll happen over the next 12 - 18 months that, you know, maybe don't seem to be big issues, but things people are going to keep an eye on. I don't know, you know, when you get back down to that 1.0 or 1.1 number, but we tend to think a year and a half from now, it'd probably be back to where we don't have anything unusual that's being reserved for because of pandemic or unusual losses. Right. That's helpful. Yeah, most of my questions have already been asked, so I'll ask my last one here on capital. You've already noted the to-date amount of share repurchases. I think I missed that number. I was curious if I could get that again. I'm sort of curious if that run rate holds beyond this quarter into 2022 for repurchases as well. Bob? Yeah. What I said in the script is in addition here in the month of October through yesterday was just under 0.7, or 700,000 shares. Let's say that. I would say as to the pace, that's, you know, in October, that's really a similar pace to what we experienced in the second quarter as we ramp that up. Here, more recently as the price increased, under our 10b5-1 program, it automatically dialed back the amount of purchases on a daily basis. As we move from blackout and out of 10b5-1 into the regular repurchase program, we'll be judicious relative to pricing levels against tangible book value opportunities for the internal rate of return on the repurchase program. As I said in my script, you know, volume going forward would depend upon the pricing and the opportunity in the market to buy back shares under the SEC limits. That's as much as I would guide to at this point. Awesome. Thank you. That's it for me. The next question comes from Steven Duong with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hi, Steven. Hi, good morning, guys. Hi. Just back on the service charges, the improvement, is that largely from NSF fees? No, I believe that, Bob, jump in, provide more clarity if you want to. There are about $700,000 that was related to just timing associated with how things were collected in one core system versus the other as we switched over. It was more just a recognition of income versus anything changed there. It'll be at this run rate going forward. Yeah, it was, Todd. Steven, that was the electronic banking fee line item that Todd is referring to. Okay. As to service charges, there were really no significant rate increases as part of the conversion. There are some account movements back and forth, so there could be a little bit related to that. You know, I think the overdraft product was used to a greater degree in the third quarter. Remains to be seen with people's liquidity if that will hold true in the fourth quarter with holiday spending projected to be up quite dramatically over last year. We'll see how that works out. As I said in an earlier question, I think it was Catherine, we were encouraged by the increase and at least for the next quarter or two, believe that that should run rate. Okay. Appreciate that. I guess, did it surprise you at all that the overdraft option, you know, more of your depositors were taking that given the level of deposits that you guys have with them? I was personally surprised. Yes. Todd, you know, I think some of that is, again, a little bit the conversion to the new system and Mm-hmm. The applicability of artificial intelligence to the limits applied to each customer's account. Todd, I might have interrupted you. No, I think that's right. It's a more intelligent system, so to speak. You know, your limits are really based upon your experience with the bank, you know, versus, you know, here everybody gets the same type of number. I think it's Mm-hmm. It's really more of a advantage to the customers that need to use it that they get the amounts that they need versus, you know, amounts that might just be standard for everybody. Got it. The electronic banking fees, is that where you record your interchange fees? Yes. Okay. All right. Just on your margin, I guess, you know, Bob, if we were to exclude the PPP impact, the purchase accounting, and also just this excess liquidity, what rate hike level do you think would get your margin to be basically neutral, you know, stabilized? Well, that's a $64,000 question as I know it. Sorry. Um. Well, I had to ask that to you before you know, go off in the sunset, so. I'm trying to get Dan Weiss on here so you can hear his voice. On the subject of the margin going forward, I think first of all we were down a few basis points from what we thought during the last earnings call, admittedly. That's really just due to the additional liquidity we've experienced on the balance sheet. All of that is either going into lower yielding securities, you know, that's down 75-85 basis points from what's rolling out of the securities portfolio to what's rolling in. On average, we were about 1.26 with new security purchases in the quarter. Stock coming off at 2.25, going into an average of 1.26, will have an impact on the margin. There was more of that, more amortization as well on existing securities from prior purchase premiums. Just the additional cash. You saw an additional $300 million in cash quarter-over-quarter. You know, that's at 5-10 basis points, basically. As I identified in the script, Steven, that represents about an 8 basis point between the additional securities and the additional cash, about an 8 basis point reduction in the margin. That's not much different than what others are reporting. In answer to your question, it really depends upon what liquidity does going forward. Mm-hmm. We are encouraging some larger institutional customers, if they have other opportunities to invest, to take those opportunities to kind of shrink back, you know, paying them 10 basis points versus us earning 10 basis points. No impact on no value to the margin. I'm not suggesting that's gonna have a large impact going forward. I do think in this low 2.80s area, again, depending upon customer liquidity, that is pretty much as low as I think the portfolio is going to go. We still do have some repricing in the loan portfolio from Old Line's portfolio particularly that had five- to seven-year fixed-rate loans. We have offsets, as I mentioned during my script in the CD area and in borrowings, whether they be the sub-debt being paid off or Federal Home Loan Bank, that should offset that for the most part. No, I appreciate that, Bob. I guess maybe just on the CDs, you know, the cost is 49 basis points this quarter. Just curious, what are you guys offering, you know, on average right now for your CD product? I mean, given the level of liquidity that you guys have, can you just, you know, get down to say, like 10 or 20 basis points and let the customer choose if they wanna move it over into, you know, a money market or a savings account? really have seen a lot of that over the last year. It's the only line item in deposits that's down. Really that's. We've been below market on our posted rate offerings for some time with CDs. Mm-hmm. Just as we continue to see this influx of cash, a lot of customers are going short in the money market or savings accounts and not reinvesting. You asked what those average rates are, and they're in the 20-25 basis points range on average should be lower than that for 6-month CDs, a little bit higher for, say, a two- or three-year CD. Really do think there's $500 million-$600 million of repricing securities. I'm sorry, CDs, still an opportunity to see that line item. You can see how much it's come down over the past year in the press release. Still some opportunity there in addition to what I mentioned on borrowings. Right. Appreciate that, Bob. I guess with the 2025 base, 2025 that you're offering, are people rolling into these the new CDs or they, you know, willing to go, you know, say, I don't wanna lock my money in for six months or a year and move it into, you know, your other products? We experience about 60%-65% CD renewal. I don't think that's much different from the industry. You know, again, let's say two-thirds of our customers are back into the same CD. They're not really changing maturities, and then the rest are either taking it to other places or they're putting it in their money market or savings or checking account. All right. I appreciate you guys taking my call, my questions. Thank you. Thanks, Steven, for the shout-out. Looking forward to Dan taking my place here. Thank you. The last questioner will be William Wallace with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Hi, William. Morning, guys. Most questions that I had have been asked, but I did want to just circle back on expenses. Last quarter, you were suggesting, I believe, mid-80s run rate. This quarter, you know, talking about an $87 million-$88 million run rate, seems like, I don't know, kind of a relatively large bump up in one quarter. I'm just wondering if you could kind of tell me from your own position, what changed? Is it just the salary increases, or was there something else in there that you weren't anticipating? Well, you backing out the settlement costs, right? The legal settlement costs? Yes. Yeah. Right. Well, about $1.4 million, you know, was related to the healthcare increase, which wasn't known at the beginning of the quarter. We think that, you know, that was a big number. It may not be repeated. Then the hourly salary increase as well too was another half million. There's a couple million dollars, you know, right there, that kinda bridged that gap that was not anticipated at that time period. I think $85 million, yeah, that's where we're at, kind of think going forward. You know, as Bob mentioned, probably $87 million-$88 million because of the investment in people that we're gonna make. You know, a lot of banks had to pivot during the third quarter with regard to people and just in order to retain them and be able to fill open positions and keeping everything functioning the way you want it to function. You know, you had to go out and raise salaries for people. That showed up in the third quarter, not just the hourly raise, but, you know, we did it for some other positions as well too. It's. I don't want to just chalk it up to inflation, but there's a good chunk of it that's in there that, you know, was recognized during the third quarter that was a little stronger than what we would have expected at the end of the second quarter. Bob, would you add anything to that? Well, we do anticipate a little bit higher marketing spend here in the fourth quarter as compared to the last couple quarters of run rate. We've been kind of guiding to that throughout the year, but hadn't really experienced it, but do anticipate a little bit more here in the fourth quarter. And then, you know, related to discretionary expenses, we just anticipate that post-pandemic, you know, there are more meetings with customers. There are more opportunities for business meals and entertainment as compared to the last couple of quarters. We are anticipating that you'll see a little bit more return to 2019 run rate spend in terms of travel and other general administrative costs. The FDIC insurance, remember we had a pretty significant credit that we experienced there in the second quarter. That was back to its normal level here in the third quarter at about $1.2 million. Miscellaneous taxes, which are down in other operating, experienced about a $900,000 dollar reduction in the second quarter. We had some of that in the third quarter as well, as we filed tax returns. Not anticipating that to continue here in the fourth quarter. Those are just two or three factors that I would add as additional detail to Todd's mention on the salary and benefits side. Yes. There's about $2 million, you know, that showed up that because of the healthcare expense and the salary increases that, I think had we known that at the end of the second quarter, we would have built that in, probably said something in the $87 million-$88 million range. I think, but, you know, we really tried to address that in some other areas. I mean, if we look at our pre-tax, pre-provision, kind of excluding, you know, the restructuring costs and the settlement costs and all that. The pre-tax, pre-provision Excluding restructuring and settlement, you know, $60.2 million and that was pretty much right on overall consensus. You know, we felt that from a profitability standpoint, you know, we met the overall consensus. You know, we even with the higher expense level, I think we found ways to cover that through the growth and some other fees like trust fees and stuff like that to offset it. You know, that $87 million-$88 million is probably a better number to use, you know, going forward, unless something really unusual were to happen, you know, one way or the other, which we don't anticipate right now. Okay. Maybe just to kind of re-ask a question that Casey had asked earlier. If some of the pressure that's driving this kind of higher guide is coming from the wage increases, is it possible that you maybe have gotten ahead of some of the annual COLA adjustments that you would have made earlier in the year and such that next year's growth rate could be maybe lower than your typical inflationary pressured growth? Yeah. I mean, we've typically used, you know, a 3% merit, you know, increase rate across the board and tried to find ways to manage to that or better than that, you know, historically. That's, you know, that's increases based upon performance being here, but also, you know, inflationary expectations in that. I think as you're looking now, you know, the whole question is it's what we're seeing as a transitory or is it permanent, right? You know, you give people a $1.50 Yeah $2 raise, you know you're not gonna take it back. You know, there is a certain element of this inflation that I think is permanent and it's becoming permanent. Yeah, it's something we'll have to look at as we get to the end of the year and first quarter of next year in terms of what are the inflation expectations, what is going on, and do we stay with, you know, the typical 3% that we've used for years? I think every bank I've been with for the last 30 years has used the same 3%. Or does that get adjusted? And I think a lot of it has to do with what are others gonna do, right? I mean, you're competing not just against other banks, but, you know, McDonald's and Arby's and gas stations and Walmart and everybody is out there, putting bonuses out and raising hourly wages, and we'll see if that continues through the fourth quarter and into the first quarter. I don't have a lot of visibility to that right now, but. Okay It'd be nice if we got ahead of the COLA adjustments a little bit, but I'm not so sure at this point. Okay. All right. Thanks. On the legal settlement, I don't recall seeing any legal matters disclosed in the financials. Correct me if I'm wrong, but yeah, I guess it's a you know, relatively large settlement if there hasn't been a disclosure of a suit prior. Can you give us any you know, I understand you probably can't say much about it, but any indications to the nature of the suit itself? Was it out of a relationship that was acquired or legacy? No, I would just say, you know, I wanna be respectful of the process, kind of where we're at with it. That's why we put it in as pending 'cause we've got it all ironed out. You know, we wanna get everything signed and officially done and all that. I would tell you that it's very typical of what you've seen with a lot of other institutions over the last year. I think, matter of fact, I think there may be several hundred institutions that are going through this, kind of the same process. So it's nothing out of the ordinary or unusual with regard to that. What I will tell you is that the settlement is global and it's across all of our markets, right? You know, that would be the end of it. You know, I don't wanna get into specifics, but it's very typical of what you're seeing a lot of other banks report. Okay, thanks. Bob, you say you're looking forward to Dan being on these calls, but I think you're gonna miss us as much as we're gonna miss you. I'll stop there. Thanks, guys. Thank you, Wally. I will just say I've really enjoyed working with all of you over the years, and I appreciate your kindness. I do miss seeing you in a live setting. Maybe there'll be opportunities for that down the road. I'm not sure. Send me notes on the beach, so to speak. Yeah, I do wanna thank Bob for his 20+ years of service. He's just done a great job for us, and he's done a really nice job getting Dan ready as well, too. Bob's still gonna be around, you know, in a consulting capacity. Got a lot of respect for him and what he's done and what he is gonna help us with in the future as well during the transition. I just wanted to make that comment. Hope we have the opportunity to see you all at an upcoming conference. Seems like more of these are being done in person, which I'm very pleased about. I know we're gonna be in Arizona next week at one, and we've got others planned down the road. I'm excited about getting a chance to see people face-to-face again. Thank you for your time today. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.