Good day, and welcome to the NextEra Energy and NextEra Energy Partners Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing star then zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on a touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jessica Geoffroy, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, Matt. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our Third Quarter 2022 combined Earnings Conference Call for NextEra Energy and NextEra Energy Partners. With me this morning are John Ketchum, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of NextEra Energy, Kirk Crews, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NextEra Energy, Rebecca Kujawa, President and Chief Executive Officer of NextEra Energy Resources, and Mark Hickson, Executive Vice President of NextEra Energy, all of whom are also officers of NextEra Energy Partners, as well as Eric Silagy, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Florida Power & Light Company. Kirk will provide an overview of our results, and our executive team will then be available to answer your questions. We will be making forward-looking statements during this call based on current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from our forward-looking statements if any of our key assumptions are incorrect or because of other factors discussed in today's earnings news release, in the comments made during this conference call, in the Risk Factors section of the accompanying presentation, or in our latest reports and filings with the SEC, each of which can be found on our websites, nexteraenergy.com and nexteraenergypartners.com. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. Today's presentation also includes references to non-GAAP financial measures. You should refer to the information contained in the slides accompanying today's presentation for definitional information and reconciliations of historical non-GAAP measures to the closest GAAP financial measure. As a reminder, Florida Power & Light completed the regulatory integration of Gulf Power under its 2021 base rate settlement agreement and began serving customers under unified rates on January 1, 2022. As a result, Gulf Power is no longer a separate reporting segment within Florida Power & Light and NextEra Energy. For 2022 and beyond, FPL has one reporting segment and therefore, 2021 financial results and other operational metrics have been restated for comparative purposes. With that, I will turn the call over to Kirk. Thank you, Jessica, and good morning, everyone. Before I begin today's discussion of our third quarter results, I would like to extend our deepest sympathies to all those who have been affected by the widespread destruction caused by Hurricane Fiona and Ian over the last month. Hurricane Ian was the fifth strongest hurricane to ever make landfall in the continental U.S. The powerful and destructive storm hit Southwest Florida as a high-end Category four hurricane with sustained winds of approximately 150 miles per hour, devastating storm surges and numerous tornadoes, tragically resulting in the loss of lives and causing more than 2.1 million FPL customers to lose power. In preparation for the hurricane, FPL assembled a restoration workforce of approximately 20,000 workers. This preparation and coordinated response, combined with FPL's valuable hardening and smart grid investments, enabled the company to restore service to roughly two-thirds of affected customers after the first full day of restoration following Hurricane Ian's landfall. This represents the fastest restoration rate in our history for a major hurricane. Our dedicated and resourceful workforce was able to restore essentially all FPL customers who were able to safely accept power within eight days. I would like to thank all of our employees who made personal sacrifices, leaving their own homes to serve our customers, our communities, and our state. It was because of their training, their preparation, their dedication, and their commitment that we were able to restore power to our customers so quickly. I would also like to thank other members of the restoration team, including the contractors, vendors, and first responders that supported our efforts for their dedicated assistance during this critical time. Finally, we are deeply grateful for the assistance provided by our industry partners who came from 30 different states to help support our customers. Mutual aid in times of disaster is one of the hallmarks of our industry, and this storm was no exception. For nearly two decades, FPL has invested significantly in building a stronger, smarter, and more storm-resilient grid. While no energy grid is hurricane-proof, the performance of our system demonstrates that FPL's hardening and undergrounding investments are providing significant benefits to our customers. Despite sustained winds of approximately 150 miles per hour, FPL did not lose a single transmission pole or tower during Hurricane Ian. Initial performance data show that FPL's undergrounding distribution power lines performed five times better in terms of outage rates than existing overhead distribution power lines in Southwest Florida. On a related note, we were pleased that the Florida Public Service Commission substantially approved our 2023 storm protection plan earlier this month, which we expect will lead to an even stronger and more resilient grid for the benefit of our customers. Finally, we are proud to report that our generation fleet, including our solar sites, sustained almost no structural damage. Despite 38 of FPL's 50 existing solar sites, or approximately 12 million panels being exposed to storm conditions, less than 0.3% of our solar panels were affected, and those impacted were mostly at our older fixed racking sites. Our battery storage sites, including one of the world's largest solar powered batteries at our Manatee Solar Energy Center, remained available throughout the storm. We believe these investments, together with our preparation and coordinated response, have improved FPL's overall reliability and resiliency, providing significant value to our customers. Although FPL has not completed the final accounting, our preliminary estimate of Hurricane Ian restoration costs that we plan to recover from customers through a surcharge is approximately $1.1 billion, of which approximately $220 million will be utilized to replenish the storm reserve, subject to a review and prudence determination of our final storm cost by the Florida Public Service Commission. Under its current settlement agreement, FPL is allowed to collect an equivalent of $4 million for every 1,000 kWh of usage on residential bills, but can request an increase to the $4 million equivalent surcharge given the cost exceeded $800 million. We anticipate discussing the surcharge amount and timing with the Florida Public Service Commission in the coming months. Let me briefly comment on the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA, and what it means for our customers, for our company, and for our industry. At our investor conference in June, we announced our vision to lead the decarbonization of the U.S. economy, and we announced our industry-leading goal to deliver Real Zero emissions by no later than 2045. We discussed our strategy to get there and how every part of our strategy is focused on saving customers money on their energy bills. We also said in June that achieving our goals would require constructive governmental policies and incentives. The IRA gives us those policies and incentives at the federal level. It also gives us visibility into what those policies and incentives will look like for what we believe will be more than two decades. We believe that the IRA will not only help reduce carbon emissions, strengthen energy independence and security, and create jobs in our industry and in our domestic supply chain, but also, and most importantly, will reduce the cost of energy for everyone. We can already see some of the positive impacts of the IRA on customer bills at FPL. Last month, we filed with the Florida Public Service Commission our estimate that the solar production tax credits in the IRA are expected to save customers nearly $400 million over the course of our current rate agreement. Those savings start with a one-time $25 million refund through the capacity cost recovery clause in January 2023 to reflect the solar PTCs on our completed 2022 rate-based solar projects, subject to a review by the Commission, which we expect later this year. Looking forward for our FPL customers, we believe that the IRA makes every solar project, every battery storage project, every renewable gas project, and every green hydrogen project more cost effective. These solar battery storage, renewable gas and green hydrogen projects are designed to reduce the impact that fuel volatility can have on customer bills. We believe the IRA will help make Florida an even better place to raise a family or build a business as we work toward our goal of delivering 100% carbon emissions-free energy affordably and reliably. We believe the IRA will also make clean energy cheaper for our customers at Energy Resources. We have never been more excited about our opportunity to partner with customers to decarbonize the power sector as well as broader parts of the U.S. economy. The IRA provides decades of visibility to low-cost renewables, and that visibility has already encouraged our power sector customers and customers outside the power sector to think big about how they can realize the value of renewables to reduce costs and emissions. As a world leader in renewables with deep energy market expertise, we are having conversations with customers about large-scale opportunities unlike anything we have seen in the past. While some will take time to develop, we cannot be more excited about the future. Turning now to our financial performance, NextEra Energy delivered strong third quarter results with Adjusted EPS increasing by approximately 13% YoY. FPL increased EPS by $0.07 YoY, growing regulatory capital employed by approximately 11% over the prior year period. We have highlighted in the past our smart capital investments in fuel efficiency, combined with our best-in-class O&M performance and productivity initiatives, provide significant benefits to customers and have allowed us to continue to deliver residential bills well below the national average and the lowest among all the Florida investor-owned utilities. At NextEra Energy Resources, Adjusted EPS increased by $0.06 YoY. We continue to capitalize on a terrific environment for renewables development, originating approximately 2,345 MW of new renewables and storage since the last call. With economics as a significant driver, Energy Resources continues to capitalize on strong renewables demand from both power and non-power sector customers, particularly in light of high power prices and high natural gas prices. Overall, we are well-positioned to achieve our long-term financial expectations, subject to our usual caveat. For the third quarter of 2022, FPL reported net income of nearly $1.1 billion or $0.54 per share, which is an increase of $147 million and $0.07 per share, respectively, YoY. Regulatory capital employed increased by approximately 11% over the same quarter last year and was the principal driver of FPL's EPS growth of approximately 15%. FPL's CapEx were approximately $2 billion in the third quarter, and we continue to expect our full year capital investments to total roughly $8.5 billion. FPL's reported ROE for regulatory purposes is expected to be approximately 11.8% for the 12 months ended September 2022. Largely as a result of warm weather, we have fully restored our surplus depreciation reserve, leaving FPL with a balance of approximately $1.5 billion to use over the term of the current settlement agreement. As a reminder, our 2021 settlement agreement provided a mechanism whereby a sustained increase in 30-year Treasury bond yields would trigger an increase in FPL's authorized ROE range. Accordingly, the Florida Public Service Commission approved an increase in FPL's authorized midpoint ROE from 10.6% - 10.8%, with an allowed range of 9.8%-11.8%, which became effective on September 1, 2022. Importantly, FPL will not increase base rates as a result of triggering the increased authorized ROE. For the full year 2022, FPL continues to target an 11.6 ROE, but is allowed to earn at the high end of the revised range, which may occur based on, among other things, warmer than expected weather. The Florida economy continues to be healthy. Florida's unemployment rate of approximately 2.7% remains below the national average and at its lowest level in more than 15 years. Florida's labor force participation rate remains strong. In spite of significant inflationary pressures across many parts of the U.S., customer sentiment in Florida ticked up slightly in the third quarter. However, the August reading of the three-month average of new building permits in Florida declined YoY, which is not a surprise given the significant growth we have observed since the pandemic and the recent increase in mortgage rates. We continue to believe that Florida offers a unique value proposition and will continue to show strong population growth over the coming decades. FPL's average number of customers increased by nearly 83,000 or 1.5% versus the comparable prior year quarter, driven by continued strong underlying population growth. FPL's third quarter retail sales increased 3.8% from the prior year comparable period. For the third quarter, we estimate that warmer weather had a positive YoY impact on usage per customer of approximately 2.9%, and that Hurricane Ian had a negative impact of approximately 0.4%. After taking these factors into account, third quarter retail sales increased 1.3% on a weather-normalized basis, with a strong continued customer growth contributing favorably. Energy Resources reported third quarter 2022 GAAP earnings of $655 million or $0.33 per share. Adjusted earnings for the third quarter were $729 million or $0.37 per share, which is an increase in Adjusted EPS of more than 19% YoY. Contributions from new investments increased $0.02 per share versus the prior year, primarily reflecting continued growth in our renewables portfolio. Our existing generation and storage assets decreased results by $0.02 per share, primarily due to unfavorable wind resource during the third quarter, which was the third lowest wind resource quarter on record over the past 30 years. Our customer supply and trading business contributed $0.06 YoY, primarily due to higher margins in our customer-facing businesses. All other net impacts were roughly flat YoY. Additional details of our third quarter results are shown on the accompanying slide. As I mentioned earlier, Energy Resources had another terrific quarter of origination, signing approximately 2,345 MW of new renewables and storage projects. Since our last earnings call. Specifically, we originated approximately 1,215 MW of wind, 965 MW of solar, and 165 MW of battery storage projects. Included in these solar additions is approximately 270 MW of post-2025 delivery. With these new additions, net of approximately 1.3 GW of projects placed in service and roughly 680 MW of projects removed from our backlog, our renewables and storage backlog now stands at roughly 20,000 MW and provides strong visibility into the significant growth that is expected at Energy Resources over the next few years. Our development expectations through 2025 are unchanged from what we disclosed at our investor conference in June and reflect a planned renewables and storage build that is, at the midpoint, more than 20% larger than the entire renewables operating portfolio at Energy Resources today. The accompanying slide provides additional details on where our development program at Energy Resources now stands. As previously discussed, we believe Energy Resources is better positioned than anyone in our sector to benefit from the provisions of the IRA, particularly after 2025, when incentives were previously expected to expire or step down. With what we believe is over two decades of visibility for wind, solar, and storage credits, the long-term growth opportunity set is expansive and exciting. Energy Resources is uniquely positioned to capitalize on battery storage co-location opportunities with wind and now has repowering opportunities across its existing renewables footprint. New markets and new investment opportunities are being created for renewables and renewable fuels that require wind and solar as their source. Transmission will be needed to support the significant renewables build-out, and all these opportunities support our vision of leading decarbonization of the U.S. economy. A key component of our vision is helping commercial and industrial customers meet their sustainability goals by providing them with comprehensive clean energy solutions, including providing renewable fuel alternatives such as hydrogen and renewable natural gas. To that end, today we are excited to announce we reached an agreement to acquire a large portfolio of operating landfill gas to electric facilities, which will become a core part of our renewable fuels and potentially hydrogen strategies. This transaction represents an attractive opportunity for Energy Resources to expand its portfolio of renewable natural gas assets and grow its in-house capabilities in this rapidly expanding market. Energy Resources intends to purchase the portfolio for a total consideration of approximately $1.1 billion, subject to closing adjustments, plus the assumption of approximately $37 million in existing project finance debt estimated at the time of closing. Subject to regulatory approvals, the acquisition is expected to close in early 2023. In the coming years, we expect to invest roughly $400 million net of the investment tax credit benefit of additional capital into the portfolio of projects, primarily to enable production of renewable natural gas. In our base case, we expect that the acquired portfolio deliver more than $220 million of Adjusted EBITDA at Energy Resources by 2025, which is included in our financial expectations. Moreover, the acquisition is expected to deliver double-digit returns. We are particularly excited about additional upside opportunities the portfolio may enable that are not included in our base case and look forward to potentially deploying additional capital in new ventures that may qualify for new federal incentives. Turning now to the consolidated results for NextEra Energy. For the third quarter of 2022, GAAP net income attributable to NextEra Energy was roughly $1.7 billion or $0.86 per share. NextEra Energy's 2022 third quarter Adjusted earnings and Adjusted EPS were approximately $1.683 billion and $0.85 per share, respectively. Adjusted results for the corporate and other segment decreased by $3 YoY. A hallmark of our business is our financial discipline and forward planning as we grow the business, including the consideration of a range of scenarios to manage interest rate risk. In recent years, we've proactively engaged in liability management initiatives, which we expect to yield significant interest cost savings through 2025. Additionally, we have $15 billion of interest rate swaps to manage interest rate exposure on future debt issuances. With the swaps in place, we are in good shape to manage 2023 and 2024 maturities and new debt issuances despite the current interest rate environment. Finally, the recent increase in interest rates is taken into account in our financial expectations. Our long-term financial expectations through 2025 remain unchanged. For 2022, NextEra Energy expects Adjusted EPS to be in a range of $2.80-$2.90. For 2023 and 2024, NextEra Energy expects Adjusted EPS to be in the ranges of $2.98-$3.13, and $3.23-$3.43, respectively. For 2025, we expect to grow 6%-8% off the 2024 Adjusted EPS range, which translates to a range of $3.45-$3.70. We will be disappointed if we are not able to deliver financial results at or near the top end of our Adjusted EPS expectation ranges for 2022 through 2025, while at the same time maintaining our strong balance sheet and credit ratings. Inclusive of the increases in our expectations in both January and June of this year, NextEra Energy's Adjusted EPS expectations reflect a roughly 10% compound annual growth rate from 2021 to the high end of our range for 2025. In addition, for 2021 - 2025, we continue to expect our average annual growth and operating cash flow will be at or above our Adjusted EPS compound annual growth rate range. We also continue to expect to grow our dividends per share at a roughly 10% rate per year through at least 2024 off a 2022 base. As always, our expectations assume normal weather and operating conditions. Now let's turn to NextEra Energy Partners, which delivered strong financial performance for the quarter. Third quarter Adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution were up approximately 13% - 17% respectively against their prior year comparable quarter. Last week, the NextEra Energy Partners board declared a quarterly distribution of $0.7875 per common unit or $3.15 per common unit on an annualized basis, up approximately 15% from a year earlier. Inclusive of this increase, NextEra Energy Partners has now grown its distribution per unit by approximately 320% since the IPO. NextEra Energy Partners continued to execute against its growth initiatives during the quarter. Since the last earnings call, NextEra Energy Partners completed its previously announced acquisition of an approximately 67% interest in a 230-MW four-hour battery storage facility in California from NextEra Energy Resources. This acquisition further diversifies NextEra Energy Partners' portfolio into battery storage. During the quarter, NextEra Energy Partners issued approximately $145 million in new equity through its at the market program and use these proceeds along with cash on hand to fund this acquisition. Consistent with our long-term growth prospects, today, we are also introducing year-end 2023 run rate expectations, which are built upon NextEra Energy Partners' strong existing portfolio and cash flow generation potential and continued ability to access low-cost capital to acquire accretive renewable energy projects. At the midpoint, NextEra Energy Partners' new year-end 2023 run rate expectation ranges reflect estimated growth in Adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution of roughly 23% and 12% respectively from the comparable year-end 2022 run rate expectation. Overall, we are pleased with the year-to-date execution at NextEra Energy Partners and believe we are well-positioned to continue delivering LP unitholder value going forward. Turning to the detailed results, NextEra Energy Partners' third quarter Adjusted EBITDA was $377 million and cash available for distribution was $185 million. New projects, which primarily reflect contributions from approximately 2,400 MW of new long-term contracted renewable projects acquired in 2021, contributed approximately $66 million of Adjusted EBITDA and $23 million of cash available for distribution. The third quarter Adjusted EBITDA contribution from existing projects declined by approximately $18 million YoY, driven primarily by unfavorable renewable resource. Wind resource for the third quarter of 2022 was approximately 95% of the long-term average versus 101% in the third quarter of 2021. Third quarter cash available for distribution benefited from higher YoY pay-go payments from both new and existing projects after a relatively strong wind resource period in the first half of this year. Additional details of our third quarter results are shown on the accompanying slide. From a base of our fourth quarter 2021 distribution per common unit at an annualized rate of $2.83, we continue to see 12%-15% growth per year in LP distributions per unit as being a reasonable range of expectations through at least 2025. We expect the annualized rate of the fourth quarter 2022 distribution that is payable in February 2023 to be in the range of $3.17-$3.25 per common unit. Additional details of our long-term distribution per unit expectations are shown on the accompanying slide. NextEra Energy Partners continues to expect year-end 2022 run rate Adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution in the ranges of $1.785 billion-$1.985 billion and $685 million-$775 million respectively, reflecting calendar year 2023 contributions from the forecasted portfolio at the end of 2022. At year-end 2023, we expect the run rate for Adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $2.22 billion-$2.42 billion and run rate for cash available for distribution to be in the range of $770 million-$860 million. These new expectations highlight our continued confidence in NextEra Energy Partners' ability to deliver on its long-term distribution for common unit growth expectations. As a reminder, all of our expectations are subject to our normal caveat and include the impact of anticipated IDR fees as we treat these as an operating expense. NextEra Energy Partners is well-positioned to manage financing costs in the current interest rate environment. Approximately 98% of NextEra Energy Partners' long-term debt, including current maturities, is not exposed to fluctuations in interest rate as it is either fixed rate debt or financially hedged. Moreover, NextEra Energy Partners has $6 billion of forward-starting interest rate swaps, which will help mitigate the impact of higher interest rates on future debt issuance, whether for growth or maturities. NextEra Energy Partners also has no significant debt maturities in 2023, and debt maturities over the next five years are manageable in, with the forward-starting swaps. Finally, I'd like to close with a few words about how we expect the IRA may benefit NextEra Energy Partners and its LP unitholders. In response to the extension and expansion of clean energy tax credits, we anticipate an acceleration of renewables and storage deployment in the U.S. over the next few decades. We expect that NextEra Energy Partners will continue to have ample opportunities to acquire assets from both energy resources and from third parties. Additionally, we believe that the long-term organic growth potential for NextEra Energy Partners has increased, with potential new opportunities to repower its roughly 8 GW existing wind and solar assets and to pair battery storage with its nearly 7 GW existing wind portfolio. Considering the potential impacts of the IRA, our expectation regarding the overall tax position for NextEra Energy Partners remains largely unchanged, including that it is not expected to pay any meaningful taxes for at least the next 15 years. Combined with its current yield and the expectation of 12%-15% annual distributions per unit growth through at least 2025, NextEra Energy Partners has the potential to deliver a total after-tax return of approximately 20% annually through this timeframe. With the ongoing strength of the renewables development environment and all of the market tailwinds provided by the IRA, we believe that NextEra Energy Partners remains well-positioned to continue delivering on its unitholder value proposition. In summary, we continue to believe that both NextEra Energy and NextEra Energy Partners have some of the best execution track records in the industry, and we are extremely excited about the long-term growth prospects for both businesses and the value we can continue to create for both customers and shareholders. That concludes our prepared remarks. With that, we will open the line for questions. We will now begin the Q&A session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question will come from Steve Fleishman with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi, good morning. Thanks. Just first on the last quarter, you had mentioned the 2 GW of potential backlog that could be at risk, you know, due to circumvention and the like. I don't see any updated footnotes on that, so I don't know if that's resolved or could you give us an update on those 2 GW? Good morning, Steve. It's Rebecca. I'd be happy to start with that answer. First, let me start with the most important part, which is everything that we're seeing at this point in terms of origination at Energy Resources is just terrific. We're seeing strong demand across all the technologies, strong demand across the different customer groups, and strong demand across the country. I feel terrific about meeting the long-term expectations that we've laid out, including reiterating today of the 27.7 GW-36.9 GW of new projects put into service between 2022 - 2025. I think the origination for this quarter of the, you know, over, you know, 2,300 MW is a great sign of that. The momentum remains very strong. As you know and appreciate, being involved in the development process, there's always some things that can go wrong as you move forward with developing a project where it could be unforeseen permitting or interconnection issues, or something else that gets in the way. Occasionally we do remove projects from backlog like we did today. We didn't include the reference to the 2 GW, mostly because it's gonna be harder and harder as time goes by to identify what's related to issues from circumvention and supply chain versus normal development issues. I think I'd lean more on the side of giving you context for what's going on against our expectations, what's the current momentum, and both of those are just terrific. Okay, that's good. I guess just specific to supply chain, any updated things that you're seeing related to UFLPA impacts? Yes, Steve. You know, it continues to be an opportunity for our team to work through challenges that we're experiencing along with the rest of the industry. We've continued to work with the various agencies, most importantly, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, with our suppliers to bring clarity to these implementing regulations. While we continue to see progress, it also continues to be slower than we would like. Everything that we've laid out today in terms of our expectations reflect our latest views on when panels will be delivered to us and we'll be able to bring projects into service for our customers. One of the biggest things that our team has been working on over the last year is how do we mitigate the risks related to these broader geopolitical issues, whether you focus specifically on a circumvention issue or whatever else it might entail. Our suppliers have made tremendous progress on de-risking that, and we've gotten a lot of increased confidence longer term that we'll be able to mitigate the issues even if we see some disruption in the short term. Okay, great. Thanks. One last question, just, I guess, on the internal investigation related to the Florida political noise. Is there any update on timing and/or outcome of that? Steve, this is John. I'll go ahead and take that. You know, let me just start from the beginning. As you know, media articles have been published that allege, among other things, campaign finance violations by FPL, and we have, of course, been conducting a very thorough review of those allegations with the national law firm, Paul, Weiss. Late yesterday afternoon, a complaint was filed by a nonprofit corporation with the Federal Election Commission that appears to center around some of the same allegations as those that have appeared in a lot of the media articles. All those allegations that have been made are within the scope of our review. We have, of course, been taking the matter very seriously, and we will continue to do so as we work towards completing our thorough review of these matters as quickly as possible. That's really the only update I have at this point. Okay. All right, thank you. Our next question will come from Julien Dumoulin-Smith with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, team. Thank you for the time. Appreciate it. Listen, I just wanna jump at the heart of the matter here. How do you think about IRA in terms of increasing your EPS through the 2025 forecast? Or is this about extending the duration of the existing growth and/or both, right? The pivot to the solar PTC from ITC for a host of products already in place should be immediately accretive, you would think, but clearly there could be some offsets as well. Related, the added opportunities and the repowering and storage co-location, as you guys quantified just now, in theory, should also afford an accelerated opportunity. I just wanna come back on how you guys wanna tackle that from an earnings recognition perspective. Yeah. Let me go ahead and take that, Julien. This is John. As you said, look, IRA provides a tremendous opportunity set for us across the board. Obviously, we've had some contracts that were already in place, you know, that assumed ITC on solar and obviously benefit from the production tax credit. There's benefits certainly in the existing portfolio. I think we're also going to see some improvement, you know, going forward, as I said, I think, you know, recently at a conference, in our 70/30, in the way things are treated on the unregulated business mix standpoint. 'Cause remember, those new PTCs that we get actually help to buy down the contribution from the unregulated side of the business. That's a big benefit for us as well going forward. We have transferability options now built into IRA that should help the cash flow from operations as well as we think about the future of the business. I mean, obviously it creates a lot of immediately in the money opportunities for us going forward, both on wind, on solar, and on battery storage. Nobody has the existing footprint that we have. Having not only 20 GW backlog, but you combine that with, you know, 25 GW of operating renewables, and you just think about the potential opportunity of 45 GW around repowerings and with regard to co-located storage, because as we all know, under the old regime, the only way you could really introduce storage into the puzzle was by combining it with solar. Nobody has the wind footprint that we do. Now we have the opportunity to collocate storage at all of our wind sites, not only that we own today, but that we might build going forward. The same goes with solar. Obviously there's an opportunity now to go ahead and build storage standalone. That is terrific, not only for energy resources, but obviously provides a great opportunity set, for NEP, going forward as well. In terms of timing, which I think was the other part of your question, I think we've been very open, you know, that we plan to, you know, provide a further update on the next call, in January on the Q4 call. Got it. Just to get ahead of that fourth quarter a little bit, you would have a more holistic update on just the extent of the repowering opportunities and co-located opportunities through, call it, the 2025 period? By fourth quarter. Again, I get that it takes some time to actually execute and decide what tenfold. I mean, Julien, we'll do the best we can. Remember too that, you know, there are some regulations we're working on with the Department of the Treasury as well. Some of that update around repower and co-located storage might be tied to finalization of those, but we'll certainly try to give a view. Got it. All right. Thank you. Hey, best of luck. We'll speak then. Yeah, thank you. Our next question will come from Shar Pourreza with Guggenheim Partners. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Good morning. Good morning, Shar. Just a real quick follow-up on Julien's question. Maybe just fine-tuning it a little bit as we're kind of looking at, you know, just the near-term earnings guidance that you guys have out there. How do we sort of think about the IRA impact as we're thinking about existing PPAs, right? Which predominantly don't have any reopeners. You couple that with sort of some of the counteracting items like higher interest rate environment. Do these two sort of items, are they, you know, are they offsetting? Are they accretive? I guess, how do we think about those two items in the context of what you guys have just reiterated this morning? Yeah, I think, Shar, you've got to balance all those things together. You know, first of all, it's really project by project. I mean, some projects benefit more than others and, you know, that really depends on which projects have been impacted by some of the supply chain issues that we have had. That's really the first piece. From an interest rate standpoint, though, I think for, you know, Kirk dealt with that. I mean, obviously the current interest rate move is taken into account in our expectations, and I think we've been very prudent and careful about managing that interest rate exposure. I mean, you know, we have $15 billion of interest rate swap protection in the book. I'd really think about it more as a, you know, an ITC to PTC versus supply chain trade-off. Some projects will benefit more than others. You kind of have to go down the list and look at it on a deal-by-deal basis. Got it. Okay. That's helpful. Just on FPL, obviously had a 10-year site plan Adjusted for inclusion of tax legislation. I think IRA came out even better than prior proposals. Does that prompt an update for a preferred solution at FPL? I mean, it may be going from 10 gigs - 20 gigs. What would be the cadence for an update or to pivot resource strategy there? We'll be filing, you know, updating our 10-year site plan as we do every year. We're in the process now of updating that. That gets filed on April the first. Obviously, as talked before, there's opportunities going forward. We're always looking at ways to make it even more economic to be able to deploy the assets, including the solar that we're currently doing. But we're currently five years ahead of plan on our 10,000 MW of solar to be installed, and that's on file with the commission, and then we'll update our 10-year site plan and file that on April the first. Got it. Terrific. Just one last quick one. Just curious on the move in the RNG side. Your 25 EBITDA guidance for the acquisition is based on existing operating assets, or does that include a backlog of RNG development that would require additional funding? Thanks. Thanks, Shar. I appreciate the question. We're really excited about the acquisition. It is about just over 30 projects that do landfill gas to electricity or renewable natural gas today. That number in 2025 reflects our base case. In our base case, we are converting a number of those facilities from landfill gas to electricity to renewable natural gas. It does include the investment that we referenced in the prepared remarks of about $400 million in order to convert them to produce renewable natural gas. One of the reasons why we're really excited about the transaction, though, is there's a lot of optionality in it, and some of which was afforded in the Inflation Reduction Act. One is, these projects now qualify for an investment tax credit, which obviously enhances the economics of the conversions. There's also the opportunity to support the further decarbonization or the improving of carbon intensity for blue hydrogen, which really opens up a whole new market for renewable natural gas that we think is gonna be very attractive to blue hydrogen producers to enable the full value of the PTC, where they otherwise wouldn't have been entitled to the full value of the PTC. In doing that, we think that creates a real long-term contracted market because a blue hydrogen producer would be very motivated to lock in the value that the renewable natural gas blending will bring to their economics. There's also the opportunity, if it isn't a blue hydrogen contribution, actually to keep some of these assets producing electricity, and utilizing what we expect are new regulations coming out of the EPA, to enable a pathway for the RINs, the predominant renewable fuel credit that renewable natural gas benefits from today, that there'll be a pathway enabled for electric vehicles. That might enable us to not invest that $400 million in some or all of those assets to convert them to renewable natural gas. I think the bottom line is we're very excited about it. We think this is a great platform from which to grow, our renewable fuel business, renewable energy solutions, in order to help our customers across a broad set of sectors, both in the power sector and beyond, to enable their full decarbonization. Terrific, guys. Thanks very much. See you in a couple weeks. Appreciate it. Thanks, Shar. Our next question will come from David Arcaro with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Oh, hi, good morning. Thanks so much for taking my question. Hi, David. Good morning. Morning. Maybe continuing on that, just wondering more broadly, your thoughts on the M&A landscape. Are there priorities or attractive opportunities out there in the market right now that you might be considering? I'll go ahead and take that. David, this is John. We have so many terrific organic opportunities, growth opportunities in front of us. M&A is not an area of focus. Got it. That's clear. Maybe on the renewable side of things, wondering if you could comment on the ICC and FEMA proposal to raise the structural risk rankings of solar and wind. What could that do for your projects, your pipeline, and costs for developing renewables? I'll go ahead and take that as well. FEMA did come forward with some recent proposals. Those have not been put to a final vote yet. I think the best example as to why none of those changes are required is what we just saw with Hurricane Ian. You know, Kirk had some of those remarks in the script, but I think it's worth noting, and obviously we put this information back in front of FEMA, that none of this is necessary. Because if you evaluate what happened in Hurricane Ian, which was the fifth worst, most catastrophic storm to ever hit the continental United States, it passed over 38-50 of our solar sites with maximum sustained winds of 150 miles per hour. We had essentially no impact to our solar generating facilities. About 0.3% of the panels were impacted. You got to remember, that slight number of impacts that even occurred were on the older sites that had the fixed tracker technology. Now, with the new tracker technology, we can move it east to west, we can pivot it to 35 degrees. The wind cuts right through it. We saw essentially no damage at those sites. The solar held up extremely well. And in some cases, I think probably better than even a gas plant would, which are really rated up to only 100 miles an hour. Really happy with the way it all performed. We think the FEMA changes are completely unnecessary. You know, we are working through that with them with terrific evidence from how our own fleet just performed a couple of weeks ago, as a no better case in point. This is Eric Silagy. Okay, great. I guess I'll just add a little bit. When John talks about the panels that were the 0.3% of panels that were affected, many of those panels weren't even damaged to the point we'd simply put them back on and reuse them. To put it in perspective, panels that actually had to be replaced out of 12 million panels is 0.03% or 3,000 panels out of 12 million. To John's point, you know, it is immaterial. We were up and running the next morning, with output at our plants. Great. I appreciate that color. Thanks so much. Our next question will come from Michael Lapides with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my question, and congrats on a good quarter. One for Eric. I'll talk about $8.5 billion of capital deployment this year at FPL. How should we think about what that level looks like, call it 2023 and 2024, and maybe what are the puts and takes that could move it in either direction for those years? Hey, Michael, it's Eric. Look, we have a robust capital plan that continues. We've talked about it before, from a standpoint of our storm hardening, that program, obviously you could see the impacts with Hurricane Ian, and how beautifully it really made a difference. We're gonna continue with our storm hardening program, our undergrounding program, our solar buildouts. We have great visibility into our capital deployed, right through the rate case settlement period and what we have filed through our 10-year site plan. Got it. I'm just trying to think about this just is capital spend above or below 2022 levels for the next couple of years? It's basically where it is at the 22 levels. It, you know, varies a little bit, but it is exactly what we put forward for the plan here for the last two years that we've had going forward. Michael, I would just add, there's no real deviation from what we shared at the Investor conference. It's in line with the plans that we laid out in terms of, you know, roughly, you know, 8, you know, 8.2 - 8.5, you know, billion a year over the the settlement term. Yeah. Yeah. The only reason I ask, and thank you for that, is given the fact you've got the full surplus amortization back on board right now, you could actually invest more to improve reliability and obviously green the system even more without necessarily having to, A, hurt earnings and, B, increase customer rates for the next couple of years. Yeah. Michael, again, we're right now sticking with our plan. We've got a good visibility. A lot of this, remember, it's a lot of execution. We've been managing the supply chain. We've been managing all the issues that have been a challenge for folks across the country. Being able to hit that CapEx plan is right now what we see as the best path forward to be able to maintain what the commission expects and financially what we expect. One for Rebecca, just curious, what are you seeing in terms of just given what's happening inflation-wise around the world, especially commodity and labor, what the cost to install new wind and solar has, you know, kinda how much that has changed before we you know, bake in the higher tax credit level? Yeah, Michael, I think, you know, we obviously had a number of comments around this at the investor conference. We certainly have seen increases in costs, both in the actual equipment prices as well as balance of system and the labor to build the projects. I don't know that it's materially changed from what we shared with you a couple of months ago. I think we were at the peak in a lot of commodity prices and even some of the key ones that ultimately affect the inherent costs of our building a project have come down since then. You know, as we think about it long term, we obviously have views on what it's gonna look like going forward, and we build those expectations into our power purchase agreement prices with our customers. I think one of the key things to keep in mind, particularly as you think about the overall demand, for renewables and other clean energy solutions long term, is that they have such a competitive advantage against the alternatives. Even where we've seen increases in costs, even in some areas maybe, you know, at parity with what we've seen in terms of the strict value that the IRA incentives may have brought in terms of a difference versus prior incentives, what we've seen is that the alternatives have increased even more. That goes for new build as well as the overall market prices. From our customer standpoint, which is who we're focused on the most, they are as compelling as they have ever been to incorporate into their solutions, whether that be a power customer to bring down electricity prices for their customers, which is clearly very top of mind for our customers today, but also our non-power sector customers who are finding ways to not only provide a lower carbon intensity product to their customers, but they wanna do it at lower cost, and we've got great solutions for them. Got it. Thank you, Rebecca. Thanks, Eric and team. Our next question will come from Jeremy Tonet with JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thanks for squeezing me in here. Just wanted to hit on RNG real quick and maybe round out the conversation a little bit more. Big acquisition here, but how do you think about the total addressable market here in. Is the focus really just on landfills in certain locations or other parts of RNG could be interesting as well. Lastly, I guess further expansion. Seems like you have quite a platform to work off here, but future RNG, would it be just organic or could there be more purchases as well? Hi, Jeremy, and thanks for the question. Listen, we're very excited about the potential for RNG in particular as part of the broad set of solutions we wanna offer our customers. I would say this is just a large step forward in something we've already been working on with smaller investments and some other co-investments with other folks. We're excited about not only adding these portfolio projects and the value that this creates for our shareholders, but also using it as a platform for future growth. As part of this acquisition, we are, you know, building a services company along with it. That's part of what the existing portfolio provides, and we're excited about incorporating those capabilities into our team. We're excited about both landfill gas and alternative forms of renewable natural gas, including dairy long term. We'll do it both through organic as well as through acquisition, and all of the above. You know, we're excited about the size of the acquisition in this space. You know, before I get too excited, we also need to keep in mind that out of the $85 billion-$95 billion of capital we wanna invest over the period we laid out at the investor conference, this is approximately, you know, $1 billion and change. A great addition to our portfolio, but still in context, a measured step in the overall portfolio. Got it. Very helpful. Just rounding out the conversation, hydrogen I think you touched on a bit, but any other updated thoughts you want to share with us, post IRA here? I'm thrilled with the prospects of hydrogen going forward, and not just literally hydrogen itself, but the renewable fuels that creates is potential solutions for our customers, whether that's synthetic natural gas as a potential solutions for customers who are looking for 7 by 24 fully decarbonized power, but also through synthetic jet fuel, synthetic ammonia products, other things that will help bring out of people's supply chain manufacturing processes, etc., their carbon intensive fuels that they use today. Some of those are not gonna be economic literally today, but there's a clear pathway to them being economic in a couple of years. Some of them, with the benefit of the IRA incentives, are economic today. At the heart of them, what the opportunity is for us is to deploy a substantial amount of renewable energy in the form of wind, solar, battery storage, the core things that we have been very successful doing for years now, if not decades, and we're continuing to invest heavily to maintain those competitive advantages going forward. Very helpful. I'll leave it there. Thank you. Thank you. This concludes our Q&A, which also concludes today's conference. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.