Good day, and welcome to the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Zebra Technologies Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mike Steele, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Good morning, and welcome to Zebra's fourth quarter earnings conference call. This presentation is being simulcast on our website at investors.zebra.com and will be archived there for at least one year. Our forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially, and we refer you to the factors discussed in our SEC filings. During this call, we will reference Non-GAAP financial measures as we describe our business performance. You can find reconciliations at the end of this slide presentation and in today's earnings press release. Throughout this presentation, unless otherwise indicated, our references to sales performance are year-on-year and on a constant currency basis. This presentation will include prepared remarks from Bill Burns, our Chief Executive Officer, and Nathan Winters, our Chief Financial Officer. Bill will begin with a discussion of our fourth quarter results. Nathan will then provide additional detail on the financials and discuss our 2025 outlook. Bill will conclude with progress on advancing our strategic priorities. Following the prepared remarks, Bill and Nathan will take your questions. Now let's turn to slide four as I hand it over to Bill. Thank you, Mike. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Our teams executed well in the fourth quarter, delivering results above our outlook. For the fourth quarter, we realized sales greater than $1.3 billion, a 32% increase compared to the prior year, and adjusted EBITDA margin of 22.1%, a nearly seven-point increase. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share are $4, which is more than double the prior year, and strong free cash flow. As we discussed on our last earnings call, in the third quarter, we saw demand recovery broaden, with data capture and printing returning to growth, following mobile computing's return to growth in Q2. Demand trends continued to improve in most end markets throughout the fourth quarter, with the manufacturing sector lagging. North America retail was a bright spot, with stronger customer year-end spending than we had anticipated. These factors, along with significant distributor destocking in the second half of last year, resulted in strong double-digit sales growth in Q4. From a profitability perspective, the operating leverage from our strong sales growth drove significant margin expansion, supporting our earnings and cash flow. As we enter 2025, our order backlog supports a solid Q1. However, we remain cautious in our outlook as our customers navigate an uncertain environment, including a dynamic global trade, geopolitical, and macroeconomic backdrop. I will now turn the call over to Nathan to review our Q4 financial results and discuss our 2025 outlook. Thank you, Bill. Let's start with the P&L on slide six. In Q4, total company sales grew approximately 32%, reflecting continued recovery in demand across our major product categories. Mobile computing strength in retail drove growth above our outlook. Our Enterprise Visibility and Mobility segment sales increased 33%, and Asset Intelligence and Tracking segment grew 29%. Our services and software recurring revenue businesses had solid growth in the quarter. We realized double-digit sales growth across our regions. In North America, sales grew 36%, with a significant improvement in large retail mobile computing orders. EMEA sales grew 24%, with strength in Northern Europe. Asia-Pacific sales increased 30%, led by Australia, New Zealand, and India, along with modest improvement in China, and sales grew 40% in Latin America, with particular strength in Brazil. Adjusted gross margin increased 410 basis points to 48.7%, primarily due to volume leverage, and adjusted operating expenses as a percent of sales improved by 290 basis points. This resulted in fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA margin of 22.1%, a 670 basis point increase versus the prior year, and a 70 basis point sequential improvement from Q3. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $4, a 134% year-over-year increase, and at the high end of our outlook. Turning now to the balance sheet and cash flow on slide seven. For the full year, we generated $954 million of free cash flow as EBITDA increased, and we drove significant improvements in working capital and inventory levels. We achieved 136% free cash flow conversion and ended the year at a 1.2 times net debt to adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio. As our cash flows recovered and debt levels have moderated, we have increased flexibility to deploy capital consistent with our allocation priorities. We repurchased $47 million of shares for the full year, with most of the activity in Q4. As part of our continued efforts to scale our expansion in adjacent markets, we recently agreed to purchase Photoneo, a leading 3D machine vision company based in Eastern Europe, for approximately €60 million, which is expected to close in the first quarter. Let's now turn to our outlook. We entered 2025 with a solid backlog supported by strong retail year-end project spending that carried into our first quarter. Our first quarter sales growth guidance range of 8%-11% reflects favorable comparisons and assumes a one-point unfavorable impact from FX due to a significantly stronger dollar over the past several months. Our first quarter adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be approximately 21%, and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of $3.50 to $3.70. This sales and profitability expectation is a sequential decline from Q4, reflective of normal seasonality. For the year, we expect sales growth between 3% and 7%, inclusive of a 130 basis points unfavorable impact from FX. Demand trends have been positive across most of our end markets, with manufacturing lagging. That said, we remain cautious in our outlook as our customers navigate an uncertain environment, and as a result, our visibility to customer spending beyond Q1 is lower than usual. Our full-year adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be between 21% and 22%, and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of $14.75 to $15.25. We will continue to remain agile to ensure we deliver solid, profitable growth. Free cash flow for the year is expected to be at least $750 million, which reflects free cash flow conversion of greater than 90%. We will continue to work on further optimizing our working capital levels balanced with our supply chain resiliency initiatives. We have made substantial progress diversifying our supply chain sourcing beyond China over the past several years. We continue to work closely with our manufacturing and trade partners to optimize our footprint, which puts us in an improved position to navigate the impacts of recently announced import tariffs. Based on the incremental 10% China tariffs that became effective in early February and the 25% Mexico tariffs that become effective in early March, we anticipate a net impact to gross profit of approximately $20 million in 2025, peaking in Q2. The impact is roughly split between China and Mexico. We expect to substantially mitigate these tariffs as we exit 2025 through supply chain initiatives and targeted price increases. Left unmitigated, the annualized impact would have been more than $60 million. Please reference additional modeling assumptions shown on slide eight. With that, I will turn the call back to Bill. Thank you, Nathan. Turning to slide 10, as we look at the long-term opportunities for our business, Zebra remains well-positioned to benefit from secular trends to digitize and automate workflows with our portfolio of innovative solutions, including purpose-built hardware, software, and services. We empower frontline workers to execute tasks more effectively by helping them navigate constant change in real time. Innovation remains central to our industry leadership, and we have consistently reinvested approximately 10% of our sales into research and development to advance our portfolio of solutions. Recent progress includes AI-based machine vision offerings, expansion into self-service kiosks, embedded RFID capabilities within our mobile computing portfolio, and eco-friendly printing supplies. We augment our organic efforts with strategic acquisitions that advance our vision. This includes our pending acquisition of Photoneo, which will expand our 3D machine vision solutions into automotive manufacturing, logistics, and other key markets. We look forward to welcoming the team once the acquisition closes. As you will see on slide 11, our customers leverage our solutions to optimize workflows across a broad range of end markets, which drives productivity and better service to their customers, shoppers, and patients. The performance bar continues to rise in an increasingly on-demand economy. Zebra works closely with our customers on their technology journey to address their biggest challenges. I would like to highlight some of the wins that transform customer workflows. A large North American retailer is beginning to deploy Zebra RFID fixed readers to optimize shelf availability for fresh food and apparel. This initial investment lays the groundwork for expansion into additional RFID solutions such as loss prevention. A leading auto manufacturer recently launched a mobile computing refresh and expansion project spanning multiple U.S. sites to provide real-time visibility and streamline final quality inspections. An online retailer in South America replaced a competitor's devices and expanded their relationship with us, selecting Zebra mobile computers, scanners, kiosks, printers, and RFID readers to optimize their inbound and outbound warehouse operations. Our reliable device performance and ability to improve operational efficiency are particularly important to this customer. Additionally, a leading retail pharmacy is deploying Zebra tablets, enabling their staff to provide improved patient care and scheduling, whether in store or off-site. This customer replaced a competitor's solution with our tablets due to the breadth of Zebra's capabilities, along with our comprehensive support and maintenance services. These projects demonstrate how customers rely on us to navigate their technology journey through our workflow expertise, commitment to innovation, and product lifecycle support. Slide 12 highlights Zebra's value proposition that we showcased at the National Retail Federation Trade Show in January. We highlighted Zebra's AI-powered Modern Store, demonstrating how our innovative solutions help retailers drive improved performance through optimized inventory, engaged associates, and an elevated customer experience. Zebra and our partners help to deliver these outcomes through improved omnichannel execution, loss prevention, worker collaboration, and more. We have partnered with Qualcomm, Google, and strategic independent software vendors to help our retail customers begin to leverage the power of AI across their frontline operations. At the show, a prominent retail customer demonstrated our Zebra Companion with AI agents that assist store associates with edge intelligence such as operating procedures, sales product information, merchandising guidance, and device operation. These agents act as digital assistants tailored to our customer's unique operating environment while leveraging generative AI to respond to queries and perform tasks without the need for extensive training. Additionally, as our customers and partners accelerate their use of AI within business-critical mobile applications, Zebra's AI suite enables quick and cost-effective development of new solutions that take advantage of the continual advancement of our mobile computing platform. While we don't expect our new AI solutions to have a material impact on near-term results, we believe they play an integral part of driving our connected frontline worker strategy. In closing, we maintain strong conviction in the opportunities ahead as we address our customers' evolving needs with our innovative portfolio of solutions. Our confidence in sustainable long-term growth is underpinned by several themes reflected on slide 13. These include labor and resource constraints, track and trace mandates, increased consumer expectations, and the need for real-time supply chain visibility. I will now hand it back to Mike. Thanks, Bill. We'll now open the call to Q&A. We ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up to give everyone the chance to participate. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question comes from Damian Karas with UBS. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. This is Srikar Vindjamuri on for Damian. Morning. Hey, good morning. So I have a couple of quick questions on what you're seeing in terms of larger project activity in Q4, if you saw any larger projects return, and how that's factoring into the Q1 guidance. Yeah, I would say that in Q4, the team delivered well at the high end of our outlook, really driven by stronger-than-expected year-end spending from our retail customers, so yes, we did see some larger projects take place in Q4. That was the broader backdrop, I would say, was double-digit growth across really all major categories, kind of all regions, all end markets, and order sizes of all types, meaning run rate, mid-tier, and large deals in the quarter, and that was certainly helped by easier compares from last year, which included distributor destocking. We see that flow-through of not just the retail activity, but a broader-based growth drove stronger sales growth in Q4 and then earnings above the high end of our outlook. Okay. Yeah, that makes sense. And as a follow-up, I just want to quickly touch on tariffs and just get a sense for what you're planning there, if you've already executed some pricing actions, what the timing around those pricing actions would be, and more broadly, what would be a trigger decision to move manufacturing to other regions? Yeah, so I think the question started about just our broader tariff response. Obviously, it's a dynamic environment. We have a dedicated team to establish and monitor the changes, what are the potential impact, design mitigation strategies. And if you look at our—and obviously now we just want to provide transparency around what has been announced to date. We do expect to announce price increases shortly to respond to the announced tariffs, which is part of the mitigation strategy that's embedded in the current guide. Perfect. Thanks for taking the questions. The next question comes from Tommy Moll with Stephens. Please go ahead. Good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. Good morning, Tommy. You mentioned that the visibility beyond the first quarter is lower than usual for this time of year. My question is, as you rolled up your full-year sales outlook, what kinds of assumptions were you making on large deals there? I know in the past, you look at the funnel and the pipeline and make some assumptions about conversion. What kind of assumptions are we making this year? Thank you. Yeah, I'd say, Tommy, maybe a broader view of that, and then I'll cover kind of large deals. I'd say that as we entered 2025, certainly with solid backlog driven by the stronger retail spending, so larger orders, as you talked about, that carried into first quarter from fourth quarter. And we're expecting solid, broad-based organic growth in 2025. But while we haven't seen customers really pull back spending to date, we clearly are seeing some impacts from the market uncertainty playing out with our customers. And in a couple of examples, budgets still being finalized, right? And that impacts our visibility kind of and tempers our expectations beyond Q1. We're seeing, specific to large orders, some customers stage deployments over longer periods of time. So that's something we are actually seeing some customers do. Clearly, we're seeing strong U.S. dollar is a headwind to us, right? The FX impact. And that's causing a little bit of concern from some of our international customers and their plans with the strong U.S. dollar, not as much large deal-oriented, but still some impact. And I think that our customers are really focused on, hey, what's the potential impact on their business of the overall global trade policy and thinking about how do they mitigate it? And it just adds to the uncertainty of their projects and visibility, small and large, moving forward and our visibility around it. So while we feel good about our business and that we're confident in our business, our guide really reflects solid organic growth despite all these uncertainties, but visibility is pretty tough, especially on large orders and deployments. Thank you, Bill. As you look at the inventory levels with some of your key channel partners, what context can you provide there? And if it feels like the bias is up or down or that you think the sell-through and the sell-in are roughly balanced at this point, any insight would be helpful. Thank you. Yeah, Tommy, this is Nathan. I'd say it's very balanced. It stayed fairly balanced throughout the year. So we're looking at days on hand in the channel. We're in a good place as we exited the year with our distribution partners around the globe. And obviously, that's a daily activity with our teams, making sure they have the right inventory at the SKU level. But again, I think we feel good about the overall inventory position here at the beginning of the year. And again, it was pretty balanced throughout the year in terms of what we saw from a sales-in, sales-out perspective if you exclude the dynamics from 2023. Thank you both. I'll turn it back. The next question comes from Joe Giordano with TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, guys. Morning. Hey, yeah, so on the full year, I guess we've touched on this a bit, but to me, given the 1Q, it feels a little conservative, but I understand why you're framing it the way you are, given the uncertainty. I'm just curious, if you were to compare the full-year framework and what you're baking in compared to where we were a year ago, how would you categorize that? It seemed like last year you were only putting in what's highly visible to you, and if there were project flows, it was all kind of upside. Is it a similar idea right now? I would say that the year is playing out a little bit like last year for very different reasons, right? I think last year we came off a year that was much different in 2023 with really our customers absorbing the capacity that they built out in the pandemic, and then we saw broader-based recovery throughout 2024. I would say the lack of visibility today and the commitment to the budgets and projects is really driven by visibility. It's the idea that they're still kind of absorbing what is the global trade policy and what's happened geopolitically can impact their business, and ultimately then it reflects back on our guide. So while we clearly see solid organic growth in the year and could it play out a bit differently where we see more confidence throughout the year, the visibility today is kind of where it's at, and that's reflected in our guide. So I think that we feel like all the uncertainty out there at the moment is causing us ultimately to be conservative and impacts the guide we're providing today. That's the visibility we have today. Yeah, that's fair enough. Just for a follow-up, the free cash flow in the quarter was excellent. I see the guide as at least 750. I mean, I guess there's infinite above that definitionally. What are the puts and takes on 25 versus 24 that we should consider? And why wouldn't it kind of build from the strength that you had here? Yeah, no, so as you mentioned, great year last year from a free cash flow perspective coming off of 2023. At a 136% cash conversion, I think just repeating that and committing to repeat that on an annual basis is a challenge. So if you look at the full-year guide of $750 million, I mean, the real difference between the two is we do expect continued working capital improvements, but just not to the degree we saw in 2024. It also does imply that as we look at our inventory position, you saw a little bit of this in Q4 as inventory ticked up a bit to support January demand, but also our teams are doing everything they can to pull volume in from a purchasing perspective and get that inventory into the U.S. as early as possible ahead of potential tariff impacts. So I think giving us some flexibility to help manage that as we go through the year and try to mitigate tariffs, use our balance sheet as much as we can to help mitigate the short-term impact from tariffs. So I'd say the big difference, again, working capital improvements, but this still implies over 90% free cash flow conversion for 2025, and we think that's just a good baseline to work from. Sounds good. Thanks, guys. The next question comes from Andrew Buscaglia with BNP Paribas. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Good morning. This is Ed on for Andrew. Thanks for taking my question. Following the developments with DeepSeek a few weeks ago, I wanted to ask about AI. You guys have long discussed the power of AI and the platform. Following the recent events, do you find that more efficient AI presents an opportunity from a product development standpoint or a net risk due to the probability or possibility of enhanced competition? Thanks. Yeah, we would see clearly AI as an opportunity for Zebra really empowering the frontline workers. So I think if we look at what Zebra's role is today in AI, first and foremost, we collect data at the frontline of business, which really gives assets and visibility in real time and gives assets and workers a digital voice, right? That really feeds AI models first and foremost. So it's kind of the heart of what we do around data collection at the frontline of business. The second opportunity for AI is that traditional AI is used today across many of our solutions across the portfolio. So whether it's machine vision inspection or optical character recognition, product recognition, package dimensioning, we use traditional AI throughout the portfolio. And at the National Retail Show in January, what we demonstrated was really generative AI capability. So an AI suite for our mobile computing portfolio that really allows ourselves and other software developers, independent software developers, to build AI applications on our devices. We've also launched Zebra Companion. So think of it as being a generative AI digital assistant that has multiple agents to it, one around knowledge within the specific customer base from their own standard operating procedures, let's say, sales information and merchandising information, device management. And there'll be multiple agents as we continue to develop these agents or our partners, software partners do. So think of these agents as a way to the frontline worker to really be empowered with additional information and capabilities, leveraging GenAI as the way to gather information from standard operating procedures, from the way customers operate, from making your newest employee as good as your best employee. We see this as really an opportunity for us to drive premium hardware sales, gain market share because we see ourselves as the innovator in this area on enterprise mobile devices, additional software as a service revenue, and recurring revenues associated with AI capabilities from our Workcloud software and our software offering. We see this as an opportunity for Zebra and leveraging AI in true real-world applications at the frontline that help our customers improve their efficiency each and every day of the frontline workers. Thanks for that. It was great to see that all in action at NRF. Pivoting over to M&A, you guys are entering 2025 with 1.2 times leverage, a fair amount of capacity to tap into. I guess if you can expand on the recent acquisition, maybe offer any other plans into capital allocation, how we could think about it in 2025, that'd be helpful. Thanks. Yeah, we're excited about the Photoneo acquisition and getting that closed ultimately. We feel good about that from a 3D vision perspective. So certainly, the 3D market is the fastest growing segment within machine vision. And we, again, have leveraged M&A to really continue to enter adjacent or synergistic opportunities beyond our organic investments in the business. And this is just another example of that. We were partnered with Photoneo already with an OEM partnership. So we know the business well and the leadership team, so we feel good about that. We certainly, as you said, have a strong balance sheet and that enables us to have flexibility. I think we'll use M&A to advance our vision and strategy. That's what we've done in closely adjacent markets. I'd say today, in the near term, given the macro uncertainty and the visibility we're kind of experiencing in the market, there's a bit of a higher bar and certainly with higher interest rates, but we continue to be inquisitive about M&A and continue to use it as a tool to advance our vision. Thanks, Ken, for taking the questions. The next question comes from Piyush Avasthi with Citi. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Morning. From a regional perspective, can you elaborate on the trends you are seeing in Europe and China based on your conversations with your customers? What's your overall outlook for these regions as we think of your one-year guidance and 2025 in general? We have heard some mixed signals from other companies, so we'd appreciate what you're seeing at your end. The two geographies of Europe and China, is that what you said? Yeah. Yep. Yeah, I'd say that. Okay, great. I'd maybe start in North America. Strong growth across all the product categories and then markets in North America. Return to year-end spend within retail. Strong growth in healthcare. Manufacturing lagging, I guess, in North America. EMEA, I'd say the highest growth rates really came from Northern Europe. Overall, we saw momentum in larger projects continue to build throughout 2024. We're continuing to see competitive wins and strength in retail in our mobile computing business in Europe, and manufacturing still remains challenging, particularly in Germany and Europe. I'd say China represents about 3% of our business overall, and we've seen modest sales growth in China as the business has stabilized. But I think in Asia, the real strength has come from more like Australia, New Zealand, India, some markets outside of China. But clearly, the opportunity exists. Continue to see modest growth in China. I think that's the story around manufacturing as well in China, right? We're seeing clearly a move to outside of China from a manufacturing perspective. And the opportunity for us is not just in China, but also to capture the manufacturing opportunities outside of China as people move supply chains to other geographies. Yeah, helpful. Quickly following up on what you just said, manufacturing lagging versus your other verticals, the current U.S. administration appears to be more pro-U.S. So based on your conversations with your customers, I know it's still early, but have you at least begun to see a step up in conversations where your customers are talking about reshaping their supply chain and maybe adopting more automation, robotics, and machine vision? Yeah, I mean, we're seeing clearly that around the world, manufacturing represents an opportunity for us. We see it as a short-term lagging the other markets, right? But we see longer-term, it's an opportunity as we're less penetrated in manufacturing than our other vertical markets. And we see the investment in automation around machine vision, the move from fixed screens to tablets with production workers and monitoring production, RFID opportunities throughout the entire supply chain, all are opportunities for us. Got it. I appreciate all the color. Good luck, guys. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Brian Drab with William Blair. Please go ahead. Good morning. Just a couple of quick questions. So on the difference between AIT and EVM in the 2025 outlook, in 2024, AIT was essentially, if I'm rounding a little bit, but flat first quarter, second quarter, third quarter, kind of around $400 million, and then you had the seasonal strength in the fourth quarter. EVM, of course, kind of improving sequentially building. Is that a similar dynamic to what you expect in 2025? Yeah, I'd say I would expect similar growth rates if we look out for the balance of the year. Obviously, there's, timing-wise, in terms of growth rates, could look a little distorted just based on obviously Q1 last year, we were down 16%, so from an easier comp, obviously that's playing into the higher growth rate in the first quarter across the portfolio, but I think on the balance of the year, again, as we talk about the visibility, we'd expect fairly consistent growth across the two segments, and we see that really across even back to the previous question. We're not seeing a huge bifurcation, whether it's geography or vertical market, or if we look at run rate, large deals, we're seeing kind of, again, consistent growth across each one of those dimensions here as we enter the year. Now, again, on a quarterly basis, you might see some variation just based on comps or timing of some deals. But I think on the year, you'll see fairly balanced growth. Okay. Thanks, Bill. And then just one other question. Could you elaborate on how you're thinking about moving production potentially? I think last time with the China tariffs and trade war, the playbook was a little bit more simple where you just move production out of China. But are you at this point considering even potentially moving some production back to the United States, I guess, which is one of the intentions of the administration? Yeah, I'd say, look, we continuously assess the manufacturing footprint and take in multiple factors from geopolitical stability to capability within the regions, which I think is a really important dynamic, as well as overall cost from a full production capability. And we have made significant progress to diversify our supply base, which gives us a lot more flexibility today to respond than we did several years ago. I mean, if you look back historically, 85% of our imports into North America were from China. And with the actions we have in place right now and that are executing, we'll end the year with about a third of our exposure from China. So again, a lot of great work over the past several years to diversify. And then if you look today, outside of China, it's primarily through Southeast Asia and kind of high single-digit exposure to Mexico. So I think we'll continue to evolve based on where things land from a trade perspective to have a diverse supply chain that gives us the most competitive position we can. So again, a lot of great activity, I think, to put us into place. I think one advantage we have is our partnership with global manufacturing partners that have footprints around the world really gives us that flexibility to leverage their footprint and where they're expanding as they react with their other customers, gives us a lot of scale and capability that we wouldn't have on our own. And we're taking full advantage of that. Perfect. Thank you. The next question comes from Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks. Just given that we're kind of hitting four or five years since COVID and kind of some of the demand surges that you saw, I know in the past you've talked about kind of considering large deal activity more indicative of refresh activity. But just is that still the same way to think about it and just kind of what you're seeing on that refresh pipeline maybe build? And then I don't think that I caught anything in terms of kind of RFID performance during the quarter and just kind of where that was versus kind of overall growth trends. Thanks. Yeah, great. I'll take both of those. I would say that from a refresh perspective, we continually have refresh activity, and I think that you look at, for instance, the fourth quarter retail spend was refresh plus additional opportunities in those retailers because remember, refresh comes with multiple years of continuing to add additional devices, add applications, and then when a refresh time comes, they typically even more broad applications. I would say, given the installed base of mobile computers and the expansion of that since pre-COVID, they certainly believe that creates an opportunity for us. We're not seeing any acceleration of refreshes like into 2025 or anything like that. But we think the time frames, every customer is on a different time frame, meaning how long they use their devices, depending on how hard they are on the devices, how many applications they use, do they need more processing power, or are they just damaging the devices because it's a hard environment. I'd say there's clearly an opportunity over the coming years here to refresh the devices we sold as you came out of COVID into 2021 and 2022. And that opportunity is still ahead of us and absolutely there. I'd say from an RFID perspective, we're pretty happy with RFID. We had a strong Q4 sales growth in RFID. We've got a pipeline of opportunities across supply chain, not just in retail, but T&L, manufacturing, even government. We've seen some opportunities most recently. Our adoptions beyond retail really have retail general merchandise, right, which has always been the primary use case into things like fresh food, right? We saw the first North American grocer really move ahead with a rollout associated with bakery and fresh foods. We've seen another large retailer in North America look at apparel as well as fresh foods. So we've seen the U.S. military move ahead with one of their branches with visibility across the supply chain. So we're continuing to see broader adoption of RFID. We've got probably the broadest portfolio of RFID of anybody from fixed to handheld readers to printers to services to specialty labels. So I think we feel good about the opportunity and the broadening of that across supply chain into grocery, into government applications. And we feel pretty good. Great. Thanks. The next question comes from Keith Housum with Northcoast Research. Please go ahead. Good morning, guys. We appreciate it. In terms of, and I hate to keep on beating the drum here with the full-year guide, but just trying to understand that a little bit better about perhaps how that changed just over the past several weeks in terms of has the lack of visibility increased because it seems like visibility was increasing over the past several quarters. And then second, can you perhaps touch on the visibility based on the end market here? Just trying to understand the dynamics there. Keith, I think part of it's visibility, but I think that is somewhat of an outcome of the uncertainty that I think everyone's experienced here over the last couple of months. So if you look at our full year guide of 3%-7%, it's over 6% on an organic basis. Obviously, the FX has become a significant headwind to sales growth since our last business update in terms of the strength of the U.S. dollar. And it's been fairly volatile even over the last coming weeks. So that FX headwind increases through the year as we roll over the hedges we've had in place, particularly here the first half of the year. And as Bill mentioned, while demand has stabilized, again, we have the wider range reflects that higher uncertainty. So again, we're not predicting a falloff from a trade war nor an acceleration, as Bill mentioned, from the refresh cycle. But we think outside of Q1, steady mid-single digit organic growth for the balance of the year is appropriate, again, given the visibility and the uncertainty around the macro economy today. Got it. Appreciate it. And then just trying to understand the trends in the overall industry. And we're seeing more and more of your devices, I guess, reach more toward the consumer end of the market. Can you talk about how your average sales price has evolved over the past several years? And where should we think about where it's going in the future? Yeah, I would say that, Keith, I'd say that there hasn't been a lot of change in ASP over the time frame. I would say that we've tiered the portfolio across mobile computing, scanning, printing to really protect the ASPs at the high end. So if you want to buy a value tier device at the lower end of the market, I have that for you. Because in the past, if I didn't have that device, I'd have to bring my mid-tier pricing to go compete at the low end of the market. So tiering of the portfolio of kind of premium, mid, and value tier has really helped us kind of protect ASPs. I think that we continue to look at opportunities for mobile computing that drive the device in the hands of more associates. That clearly is a theme we've talked about for the last several years, but we are seeing it more. We're seeing it in mobile computing, and we're seeing it in tablet. I mentioned it kind of before, and let's use manufacturing as an example. The move from fixed screens to control production to tablets is a real opportunity, right? The idea that AI and ultimately the idea of having an assistant, a digital assistant, the idea of communication collaboration, the idea of task management. More and more enterprises are realizing without having connectivity to the frontline worker, it's very difficult to communicate to them. Think of even a big box retailer. The only way for a manager to meet with everybody is to get them all in the break room and have a conversation if you have no communication collaboration vehicle throughout the store. So I think that we'll see in mobile computing ASPs are what they are. Tiering the portfolio helps. But I think there's an opportunity here to put the device in the hands of more associates. We've got new devices out to go do that. So some of our new devices are instead of scan engine-based or camera-based, but they have RFID technology on them. That's another opportunity for us. So I think we feel good about the price points we're selling mobile computing, but we're more excited about generating more demand with devices in the hands of more workers. Great. Thank you. The next question comes from Guy Hardwick with Freedom Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Morning, guys. Bill, I just want to follow up on that last point. Those of us who were at the NRF show in January saw the Zebra Companion demonstration. I know you mentioned earlier that you saw the opportunity as premium hardware sales and SaaS revenues. But could you talk maybe what you think the business model could look like for Zebra Companion three to four years out, a mixture of, say, hardware sales versus what percentage of that could be in terms of recurring revenues in either the Zebra Companion itself or, as you mentioned, some of the other software products? Yeah. I mean, I think it's still early in the launch to kind of predict where all the revenues come from. We've thought a lot about multiple areas to generate additional either volume of business or us to win more or others. So I'll give you a couple of examples maybe there, and then we can go further. But I think clearly monetizing the premium device hardware, right? We're working closely with Qualcomm and Google to make sure that we've got devices that will support AI for our customers, not only in the cloud, but on the device itself, which could drive ultimately premium hardware revenue and margin. Market share gains. We continue to lead in the innovation front, and we believe we'll do that here with AI as well, with our AI suite as well as our own companions, but also working with our partners. So anytime I can drive additional value to my end customer, either with our own software or third-party software, and make it easy for our customers to either write the software or third-party vendors or Zebra, that's an opportunity for me to gain share. Higher recurring revenues come really from things like our agents, right? The idea that Zebra is going to create AI agents on top of this AI suite that allows our customers to leverage our portfolio of software, including adding AI capabilities to our Work cloud suite that we talked about at NRF around the Modern Store. So there's opportunities for recurring revenue there as well. So I think both in our software business as well as with these agents. So I think overall, we're still working through what those projections look like. They're not near-term revenue, but they certainly are critical to our future. We believe we're on the forefront of this. We feel really good about where we're at. The business model represents lots of different opportunities to drive increased revenue and increased profit. Great. Thanks. Just as a quick follow-up, I'm just wondering whether you saw any pre-buy activity in Q4 or early Q1 and getting ahead of tariffs by customers? Yeah. No, not really. I mean, we've seen some customers. We've seen larger retail orders with year-end spending, but not really driven by tariffs. So I would say really no. Thank you. The next question comes from Brad Hewitt with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Good morning. So it appears that you're embedding about 30% organic incremental margins in 2025. I I know the long-term framework is 30% incrementals are better, but I would have thought the incrementals could have been a bit stronger in the early stages of volume recovery. So can you just walk through the puts and takes for 2025 on the margin side of things? Yeah, Brad, I think probably the first one I would point to is with the guide including $20 million of profit headwind from the incremental tariffs. And again, that's predominantly in the first half of the year. So peaking in Q2, then we'd see a pretty substantial sequential improvement from Q2 to Q3, and then fully mitigated into Q4. So obviously, if you remove that, you'd probably come to a different conclusion around the sequential improvement in margins. So I think that's one to consider. And again, where we've been focused, at least on what's been announced to date, ensuring we mitigate those as soon as possible so that we can, again, end the year kind of fully recouped and get those back as we head into 2026. I think that's probably the first and most important dynamic from a margin standpoint. I think if you look from the full year EBITDA guide of 21% to 22%, obviously, the higher end of the range would reflect removing those tariffs and get back to kind of where we would expect full profitability be on a standalone basis or a pre-tariff, or at least pre-incremental tariff basis. That's where you really see the volume leverage, along with about a half a point of FX headwind, as we mentioned earlier. I think those are some of the puts and takes. Okay. That's helpful. And then it looks like your gross margin on the services and software side of the business stepped down sequentially and has been in a bit of a downtrend since the start of 2024. So can you just talk about what's going on there and how you think about the services and software gross margin going into 2025? Yeah, so Q4 was down a bit. Some of that was just timing. We had pretty high demand from a repair volume. Part of that was internally driven just as we recouped some of the supply chain on some of those component parts and being able to get the repairs complete into Q4, and I'd still expect both that service and software line to be accretive and drive margin expansion, and as we've said before, just not to the same degree we've seen over the last five years. I mean, the team's done an incredible job on both of the portfolio service and software expanding margins over the last three to four years to get us to where we are today, and I'd still expect margin expansion, but just not to the same degree we've seen over the last four years. Great. Thanks, Nathan. The next question comes from Melissa Shravis with Barclays. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi. Good morning. Just a quick question. You guys noticed that there was strength in healthcare in Q4. Just thinking about moving into 2025, I know healthcare is the smallest vertical, but it was pretty strong all last year. How should we kind of think about that moving into 2025? Is this a vertical where we should see continued kind of outsized strength? Thank you. Yeah. I would say that in Q4, we saw broad-based demand across all the vertical markets. But as we commented, we feel good about where we're at in healthcare. We've got a portfolio of products specific to healthcare. Prior to the pandemic, healthcare was our fastest-growing vertical for some time, and it's reemerged to that in Q2, Q3, and Q4 in 2024, and we would see that continuing into 2025. I would say the improved productivity that healthcare workers get and providers get from the use of devices. I would say that the opportunities exist in clinical mobility. It's in home healthcare, patient engagement, virtual care, so I think all of that bodes well for our portfolio of solutions. We have the HIMSS show coming up, which is the largest trade show in healthcare that we're excited about. We talked about the retail show, but we're at that show in the next coming weeks, and we'll spend more time with our customers there. But I think the healthcare team, our sales team's done a great job, and I think that we've got a great portfolio of products and solutions in healthcare. So I'd see continued strength there, yes. Great. Thank you. The next question comes from Jim Ricchiuti with Needham & Company. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. This is Chris Grenga for Jim. Just a couple of quick ones. Do you anticipate the feature set for Companion being exclusive to the customer that was showcased in NRF for any period of time? And could you talk about potentially the opportunity for these types of features to be expanded beyond a retail setting into the manufacturing and perhaps transportation logistics verticals? Thank you. Yeah. So I think that no, it's not exclusive to any one customer. It's a solution, and it's in two ways. One is that our AI suite for mobile computing allows our independent software vendors and our partners to be able to leverage AI on our devices for their own applications. So that way, they can broaden it, whether it's our customers specifically in the case of the customer that presented with us at NRF, or it's independent software vendors building on top of the devices. And then we're going to build agents on our own as well from that perspective. So both. Nothing there. What was the second part of the question? Yeah. I'm being able to. I can jump in on the. Sorry. On the AI companion being used in other verticals. One good example is we're using it within our own distribution center from a knowledge management. Think of, again, language transfer, being able to translate documents and standard operating procedures into different languages to support the workforce. Again, same thing that they're trying to do in retail, which is how do you quickly train new frontline workers to get up to speed as quickly as possible? And we're using that functionality in our own distribution center. So yes, I'd say different parts of the functionality are absolutely applicable to other vertical markets. Yeah. The idea is what you train the model on, right? So ultimately, it would be standard operating procedures within, as Nate said, a warehouse or picking environment. It could be standard operating procedures inside manufacturing. So those are all opportunities to leverage the base software. And it's all about training the model for your specific application. So yes. Great. Thank you very much. Our last question comes from Rob Jamieson with TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just the first one. I know you've given a lot of color and appreciate it around the full year guidance, but just wanted to make sure I have this right. So basically, haven't seen really any indication of delays or push-outs, just more of a kind of hesitance from your customers. And maybe just taking it a little bit longer to understand the ramifications of tariffs and everything. I guess in a normal year, when would you expect to get a little bit more visibility? And then if some of this policy does come through and we get some clarity from the Trump administration, would you expect to see a little bit more of an understanding of how the rest of the year might play out? And when might that happen? Would that be later this quarter and the second quarter? Yeah. I would say that there's always customers' budgets and visibility. I would say typically by this time, we'd have more conviction by our customers that a project they're going to move ahead with. And I think it's just this visibility and uncertainty out there across the environment. There's no specific date. Customers are all different. The retail customers now are still wrapping up their year, right, as we're continuing to ship in Q1 here to finalize last year's budgets from their perspective. Other T&L customers have budgets year-end or sorry, mid-year. So it differs by customer. I think that the lack of visibility is really driven by this uncertainty, right? And as you said, if there becomes more clarity around trade and what's going to happen from a policy perspective. But even yesterday and today, there were discussions of reciprocal tariffs in other countries. So this uncertainty is not helping because our customers are focused as we are on things like, "Hey, what happens if? And how do I go mitigate tariffs and others?" as opposed to finalizing projects specifically with us. So you're right. We haven't seen anything be moved out or customers delaying things yet. We just don't have the visibility we'd normally have at this point in time. FX certainly is a headwind on the growth that's real today. The China tariffs are real today. But could the Mexico tariffs go away? That's why we try to characterize it. About 50% of what Nate talked about is Mexico, 50% is China. If it does go away, so more clarity certainly would help and give our customers more confidence in their year and then give us more clarity. The problem is, even as of yesterday and today, there's less clarity than more on tariffs. Now and thank you for that. And then just one last one. Just on the Photoneo acquisition, I know you said it's not included in your full year guidance. Is there anything you can give us in the way of potential expectations from revenue profitability for full year as that acquisition gets completed? Yeah. And obviously, based on the purchase price, it's relatively small relative to the total portfolio. But assuming closing later this quarter, it'd be around 30 basis points of incremental revenue for the year. So again, we'd include that in our guide as we move into second quarter once the deal is closed. Great. Thank you. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Burns for any closing remarks. Yeah. I'd like to thank our employees and partners for their support as we continue to work together to solve our customers' biggest challenges. Our relentless focus on innovation will continue to transform our customer workflows. We feel good about our business. Have a great day, everyone. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.